Claudin-7 is highly expressed in chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and renal oncocytoma

Claudin-7 has recently been suggested to be a distal nephron marker. We tested the possibility that expression of claudin-7 could be used as a marker of renal tumors originating from the distal nephron. We examined the immunohistochemical expression of claudin-7 and parvalbumin in 239 renal tumors, including 179 clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC)s, 29 papillary RCCs, 20 chromophobe RCCs, and 11 renal oncocytomas. In addition, the methylation specific-PCR (MSP) of claudin-7 was performed. Claudin-7 and parvalbumin immunostains were positive in 3.4%, 7.8% of clear cell RCCs, 34.5%, 31.0% of papillary RCCs, 95.0%, 80.0% of chromophobe RCCs, and 72.7%, 81.8% of renal oncocytomas, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of claudin-7 in diagnosing chromophobe RCC among subtypes of RCC were 95.0% and 92.3%. Those of parvalbumin were 80.0% and 88.9%. The expression pattern of claudin-7 was mostly diffuse in chromophobe RCC and was either focal or diffuse in oncocytoma. All of the cases examined in the MSP revealed the presence of unmethylated promoter of claudin-7 without regard to claudin-7 immunoreactivity. Hypermethylation of the promoter might not be the underlying mechanism for loss of its expression in RCC. Claudin-7 can be used as a useful diagnostic marker in diagnosing chromophobe RCC and oncocytoma.     

Expression of claudin-7 in benign kidney and kidney tumors

Claudins, a family of tight junction-related transmembrane proteins, have been implicated in the pathogenesis of various human neoplasms. Expression of claudin-7 was increased in chromophobe renal cell carcinoma in a recent oligonucleotide microarray study. We studied the expression of claudin-7 in benign and neoplastic kidneys by immunohistochemical staining. Distal nephron (distal convoluted tubule and thick ascending limb of Henle's loop) epithelium showed strong membranous staining in 100% (174/174) of the cases. Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma was positive for claudin-7 expression in 100% (36/36) of cases, while papillary renal cell carcinoma, oncocytoma and clear cell renal cell carcinoma were positive in 90% (71/80), 45% (21/47) and 7% (7/98) of the cases, respectively. Differential expression of Claudin-7 in different types of renal cell neoplasms can be useful in their differential diagnosis, particularly when used in a panel of markers. In addition, results from this study support previous reports of distal nephron origin for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and oncocytoma. The data also suggest that, as far as claudin-7 expression is concerned, papillary renal cell carcinoma may be more closely related to the distal nephron, rather than the proximal nephron.     

Parvalbumin is constantly expressed in chromophobe renal carcinoma.

Chromophobe renal carcinoma is composed of neoplastic cell showing several features similar to those found in the intercalated cells of the collecting ducts. Because the distal nephron expresses calcium-binding proteins playing a role in calcium homeostasis, we reasoned that these proteins could be expressed by chromophobe carcinoma and therefore represent a diagnostic marker. We studied the immunohistochemical expression of different calcium-binding proteins (parvalbumin, calbindin-D28K, and calretinin) in 140 renal tumors, including 75 conventional (clear cell) carcinomas, 32 chromophobe carcinomas, 17 papillary renal cell carcinomas, and 16 oncocytomas. Parvalbumin was strongly positive in all primary chromophobe carcinomas and in one pancreatic metastasis; it was positive in 11 of 16 oncocytomas and absent in conventional (clear cell) and papillary renal cell carcinomas, either primary or metastatic. Calbindin-D28K and calretinin were negative in all tumors, with the exception of two chromophobe carcinomas, four oncocytomas, and two papillary renal cell carcinomas showing inconspicuous calretinin expression. Our data demonstrate that parvalbumin may be a suitable marker for distinguishing primary and metastatic chromophobe carcinoma from conventional (clear cell) and papillary renal cell carcinoma. Moreover, they suggest a relationship between chromophobe renal carcinoma and renal oncocytoma and indicate that chromophobe carcinoma exhibits differentiation toward the collecting-duct phenotype.     

Overexpression of KIT (CD117) in chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and renal oncocytoma

KIT expression has not been studied substantially in renal tumors. We analyzed the immunohistochemical expression for KIT in 256 conventional renal cell carcinomas (RCCs), 29 chromophobe RCCs, 25 papillary RCCs, 6 collecting duct RCCs, 6 unclassified RCCs, 7 renal oncocytomas, 20 urothelial carcinomas, 7 nephroblastomas, and 23 angiomyolipomas. We found that 24 chromophobe RCCs (83%) and 5 renal oncocytomas (71%) revealed membranous immunoreactivity for KIT while none of the RCCs of other types expressed KIT immunohistochemically. Sporadic cases of urothelial carcinoma and nephroblastoma were focally positive for KIT. All angiomyolipomas were negative. Genomic DNA extracted from the chromophobe RCCs and renal oncocytomas was submitted for polymerase chain reaction and direct sequencing of the juxtamembrane (exons 9 and 11) and tyrosine kinase (exons 13 and 17) domains. No mutation was found. Our results demonstrate that KIT could be a useful immunophenotypic marker for chromophobe RCC and renal oncocytoma; therefore, it has value for the precise classification of renal cortical epithelial tumors. However, the therapeutic relevance of KIT overexpression in these tumors is uncertain owing to the lack of mutations that would lead to constitutive activation of the protein.     

Expression of kidney-specific cadherin distinguishes chromophobe renal cell carcinoma from renal oncocytoma

Distinguishing renal oncocytoma from chromophobe and other renal carcinomas is essential, considering their differing biological potentials. Although renal oncocytoma is considered a benign tumor, chromophobe renal cell carcinoma has potentially malignant biological behavior. The numerous reported studies on distinguishing these 2 entities have been based on morphological, histochemical, immunohistochemical, ultrastructural, and cytogenetic features. But none of these features has proven to be reliably specific, especially in tumors with overlapping phenotypes. We report a novel immunohistochemical approach based on the expression of a recently described kidney-specific cadherin (Ksp-cadherin) for the differential diagnosis of these 2 tumors. We compared Ksp-cadherin expression in 212 renal tumors, including 102 clear cell renal carcinomas, 46 papillary renal cell carcinomas, 30 chromophobe carcinomas, 3 collecting duct carcinomas, and 31 oncocytomas. In addition, we examined the expression of epithelial membrane antigen, vimentin, CK7, and Hale's colloidal iron staining. We found that chromophobe renal cell carcinomas consistently (96.7% of cases) demonstrated a distinctive membrane pattern of Ksp-cadherin expression, whereas renal oncocytomas (3.2%), clear cell renal cell carcinomas (0%), papillary renal cell carcinomas (2.2%), and collecting duct carcinomas (0%) usually did not express Ksp-cadherin. CK7 expression was found in 90.0%, 6.5%, 7.8%, 76.1%, and 33.3% of these tumor cases, respectively. Whereas CK7 was detected in different types of renal cell carcinomas, Ksp-cadherin was expressed almost exclusively in chromophobe renal cell carcinomas. Immunohistochemical analysis of Ksp-cadherin offers a fast, reliable approach for the distinguishing between renal oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma that is applicable for routine pathology laboratory studies without the need for time-consuming and costly ancillary studies.     

Eosinophilic and classic chromophobe renal cell carcinomas have similar frequent losses of multiple chromosomes from among chromosomes 1, 2, 6, 10, and 17, and this pattern of genetic abnormality is not present in renal oncocytoma.

That chromophobe renal cell carcinoma has an uncommon eosinophilic variant has been recognized for more than a decade. In sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin, the eosinophilic variant of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and renal oncocytoma are similar in appearance. While it is well established that chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and renal oncocytoma have different patterns of genetic anomalies, little is known of the genetics of the eosinophilic variant of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. This study was undertaken to elucidate the genetic lesions of eosinophilic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and to compare them with those found in classic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and in renal oncocytoma. A total of 29 renal neoplasms--nine eosinophilic chromophobe renal cell carcinomas, 10 classic chromophobe renal cell carcinomas, and 10 oncocytomas--were investigated by fluorescence in situ hybridization on 5 microm paraffin-embedded tissue sections with centromeric probes for chromosomes 1, 2, 6, 10, and 17. Signals were counted in 100-200 neoplastic nuclei from each tumor. Chromophobe renal cell carcinomas frequently showed loss of chromosomes 1 (70% of classic, 67% of eosinophilic), 2 (90% classic, 56% eosinophilic), 6 (80% classic, 56% eosinophilic), 10 (60% classic, 44% eosinophilic), and 17 (90% classic, 78% eosinophilic); Among the classic chromophobe renal cell carcinomas, only one had no loss of any of the chromosomes, while 50% had loss of all five chromosomes. Among the eosinophilic chromophobe renal cell carcinomas, one of nine had no loss and 44% had loss of all five chromosomes. One oncocytoma had loss of chromosome 1. No other chromosomal loss was detected in the oncocytomas. In conclusion, losses of chromosomes 1, 2, 6, 10, and 17 are frequent in both eosinophilic and classic chromophobe renal cell carcinomas. Loss of chromosome 1 occurs occasionally in oncocytoma but losses of chromosomes 2, 6, 10, and 17 are not found in oncocytomas. When the differential diagnostic problem is oncocytoma vs eosinophilic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, detection of losses of chromosomes 2, 6, 10, or 17 effectively excludes the diagnosis of oncocytoma and supports the diagnosis of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.     

Cytokeratins 7 and 20 immunoreactivity in chromophobe renal cell carcinomas and renal oncocytomas.

Chromophobe renal cell carcinomas and renal oncocytomas share morphologic similarities and may present a diagnostic challenge on routine hematoxylin-eosin staining. Currently recommended additional studies of Hale's colloidal iron staining and electron microscopy are often difficult to interpret and technically challenging and may not be readily available. Previous studies have reported conflicting results with regard to the cytokeratin 7 staining pattern in chromophobe renal cell carcinomas and renal oncocytomas. Cytokeratin 20 expression in chromophobe renal cell carcinomas has not previously been studied. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue of 11 chromophobe renal cell carcinomas and 21 renal oncocytomas were retrieved from the archived files (1984-2000) of four teaching hospitals. Of the 11 chromophobe renal cell carcinomas, eight stained positive (73%) for cytokeratin 7, one stained focally positive (9%), and two cases (18%) were completely negative. Cytokeratin 7 staining of the 21 oncocytomas revealed 4 positive (19%), 7 focally positive (33%), and 10 negative cases (48%). Cytokeratin 20 was uniformly negative on all 11 cases of chromophobe renal cell carcinomas and all 21 cases of oncocytomas. Cytokeratin 7 does not appear to show the consistent immunoreactivity in chromophobe renal cell carcinomas and renal oncocytomas, as has been previously suggested. Cytokeratin 20 immunostaining in chromophobe renal cell carcinomas and renal oncocytomas is uniformly negative. Despite the technical and interpretive challenges of Hale's colloidal iron, it is still the most useful stain in differentiating chromophobe renal cell carcinomas from renal oncocytomas.     

Diagnostic utility of S100A1 expression in renal cell neoplasms: an immunohistochemical and quantitative RT-PCR study.

S100A1 is a calcium-binding protein, which has been recently found in renal cell neoplasms. We evaluated the diagnostic utility of immunohistochemical detection of S100A1 in 164 renal cell neoplasms. Forty-one clear cell, 32 papillary, and 51 chromophobe renal cell carcinomas, and 40 oncocytomas, 164 samples of normal renal parenchyma adjacent to the tumors and 13 fetal kidneys were analyzed. The levels of S100A1 mRNA detected by quantitative RT-PCR analysis of frozen tissues from seven clear cell, five papillary, and six chromophobe renal cell carcinomas, four oncocytomas, and nine samples of normal renal tissues adjacent to neoplasms were compared with the immunohistochemical detection of protein expression. Clear cell and papillary renal cell carcinomas showed positive reactions for S100A1 in 30 out of 41 tumors (73%) and in 30 out of 32 (94%) tumors, respectively. Thirty-seven renal oncocytomas out of 40 (93%) were positive for S100A1, whereas 48 of 51 (94%) chromophobe renal cell carcinomas were negative. S100A1 protein was detected in all samples of unaffected and fetal kidneys. S100A1 mRNA was detected by RT-PCR in all normal kidneys and renal cell neoplasms, although at very different levels. Statistical analyses comparing the different expression of S100A1 in clear cell and chromophobe renal cell carcinomas observed by immunohistochemical and RT-PCR methods showed significant values (P<0.001), such as when comparing by both techniques the different levels of S100A1 expression in chromophobe renal cell carcinomas and oncocytomas (P<0.001). Our study shows that S100A1 protein is expressed in oncocytomas, clear cell and papillary renal cell carcinomas but not in chromophobe renal cell carcinomas. Its immunodetection is potentially useful for the differential diagnosis between chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and oncocytoma. Further, S100A1 protein expression is constantly detected in the normal parenchyma of the adult and fetal kidney.     

Expression of kidney-specific cadherin in chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and renal oncocytoma

Kidney-specific cadherin (Ksp-cad) recently was proposed to differentiate chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from oncocytoma based on a finding of Ksp-cad expression in 97% of chromophobe RCCs but only 3% of oncocytomas. However, another study showed no difference in Ksp-cad immunoreactivity between these 2 tumors. We attempted to evaluate Ksp-cad expression in renal tumors using expression microarrays and immunohistochemical analysis. Ksp-cad messenger RNA (mRNA) levels were examined in 158 renal tumors, including 15 chromophobe RCCs and 15 oncocytomas. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed on tissue microarrays containing 125 renal tumors, including 36 chromophobe RCCs and 41 oncocytomas. Ksp-cad mRNA compared with normal kidney tissue was 89% in chromophobe RCC and 64% in oncocytoma. Furthermore, 31 of 36 chromophobe RCCs and 31 of 41 oncocytomas showed Ksp-cad immunoreactivity. Ksp-cad was present in chromophobe RCCs and oncocytomas at mRNA and protein levels, providing strong evidence that Ksp-cad immunohistochemical analysis cannot be used in differentiating these tumors.     

ARPP protein is selectively expressed in renal oncocytoma, but rarely in renal cell carcinomas.

We have recently isolated a gene, Ankyrin-repeated protein with a proline-rich region (ARPP), that is highly expressed in the skeletal and cardiac muscle. Our previous immunohistochemical analysis revealed that ARPP expression was augmented in rhabdomyosarcoma but scarcely detectable in leiomyosarcoma, showing that ARPP is a useful marker for rhabdomyosarcoma. In the present study, we generated the anti-ARPP monoclonal antibody, YAS11, immunoreactive with the N-terminal region (amino-acids residues 1-145) of the ARPP protein. Further, we immunohistochemically analyzed 100 renal tumors including 14 oncocytomas, and 86 renal cell carcinomas (RCCs). We found that ARPP was highly expressed in 12 of the 14 (85.7%) oncocytomas, but was detectable in only four of the 86 (4.7%) RCCs. Interestingly, ARPP was not detected in any of 11 chromophobe RCCs, suggesting that ARPP may be useful for differential diagnosis between oncocytoma and chromophobe RCC. Furthermore, we found that ARPP was selectively expressed in part of the distal renal tubule in normal kidney. Immunoelectron microscopy with anti-ARPP antibody revealed that ARPP was localized in mitochondria and nuclei in both the normal distal renal tubule and oncocytoma, suggesting that oncocytoma may be derived from the distal nephron, and probably from part of the distal renal tubule.     

C-kit expression in renal oncocytomas and chromophobe renal cell carcinomas

C- kit encodes the membrane-bound tyrosine kinase KIT, whose expression has been identified in several types of human neoplasms. Recently, KIT has been reported to be a marker for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and renal angiomyolipoma. However, expression of this molecule has not been adequately studied in other renal tumors, particularly oncocytoma, which may morphologically resemble chromophobe RCC. In this study, we analyzed c- kit messenger RNA (mRNA) levels in 17 chromophobe RCCs and 20 renal oncocytomas obtained from complementary DNA (cDNA) microarrays. Furthermore, comprehensive immunohistochemical analysis of KIT protein using a monoclonal antibody was performed in 226 renal tumors including chromophobe RCC (n=40), oncocytoma (n=41), clear-cell RCC (n=40), renal angiomyolipoma (n=29), and papillary RCC (n=21) on tissue microarrays (TMAs) and was compared with immunostaining results from 25 chromophobe RCCs and 30 oncocytomas using standard sections. The staining intensity was semiquantitatively graded on a 3-tier scoring system. All chromophobe RCCs and oncocytomas showed significant overexpression of c- kit mRNA. The average increase of mRNA compared with normal kidney tissue was 7.4-fold for chromophobe RCCs and 7.4-fold for oncocytomas. Immunohistochemical expression of KIT was found in most chromophobe RCCs (95% in TMAs and 96% in conventional sections) and oncocytomas (88% in TMAs and 100% in conventional sections) but was infrequently observed in renal angiomyolipomas (17%), papillary RCCs (5%), and clear-cell RCCs (3%). Furthermore, the average KIT immunoreactivity in TMAs was stronger in chromophobe RCC (1.93) and oncocytoma (2.07) than in other subtypes of renal tumors tested, including angiomyolipomas (0.17), papillary RCCs (0.05), and clear-cell RCCs (0.03). In conclusion, we found a significant elevation of c- kit mRNA by cDNA expression microarrays and overexpression of KIT protein by immunohistochemistry not only in chromophobe RCCs but also in oncocytomas. In contrast, immunohistochemical expression of KIT was not detected in most other types of renal cell tumors evaluated. The differential expression of c- kit in these renal tumors may have diagnostic and therapeutic implications.     

Renal oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. A comparison of colloidal iron staining and electron microscopy.

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is characterized by diffuse cytoplasmic staining with Hale colloidal iron (HCI) and the presence of numerous microvesicles. The eosinophilic variant morphologically may resemble renal oncocytoma. The latter commonly shows focal cytoplasmic HCI reactivity, but microvesicles have not been previously reported. We examined 19 chromophobe RCCs and 28 oncocytomas for their HCI staining patterns. Electron microscopy was performed on 13 chromophobe RCCs and 10 oncocytomas. In all cases of chromophobe RCC, more than 75% of cells showed a diffuse cytoplasmic HCI positivity, whereas a variable proportion of cells in 20 oncocytomas showed focal cytoplasmic staining, in a perimembranous, apical, or perinuclear pattern. Ultrastructurally, chromophobe RCCs contained abundant microvesicles with varying numbers of mitochondria, whereas all oncocytomas contained abundant mitochondria with focal collections of microvesicles. The microvesicles, in perimembranous, apical, or perinuclear clusters or singly scattered throughout the cytoplasm, were morphologically indistinguishable from those in chromophobe RCCs. In most cases, the microvesicle location and HCI staining pattern correlated. Chromophobe RCC and oncocytoma have distinctive morphologic features that usually allow their recognition. In difficult cases, HCI staining and electron microscopy may help, but the presence of HCI positivity or microvesicles in an eosinophilic renal tumor does not rule out oncocytoma.     

Kidney-specific cadherin, a specific marker for the distal portion of the nephron and related renal neoplasms.

Renal cell neoplasms are presumably derived from different cell types of the nephron. Clear cell and papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are thought to be of proximal tubular origin, whereas oncocytoma and chromophobe RCC are derived from intercalated cells of distal nephron. A few molecules, such as RCC marker and CD10, have been shown to be markers for clear cell RCC and papillary RCC. Such markers are not yet available for renal tumors presumably of the distal nephron. The expression of kidney-specific (Ksp) cadherin, a recently cloned gene thought to be transcribed exclusively in the kidney, was studied in normal human kidney, as well as in 105 primary renal neoplasms, including 42 clear cell RCC, 30 papillary RCC, 13 chromophobe RCC, and 20 oncocytomas. The expression patterns were compared with those of RCC marker. The Ksp-cadherin expression was noted preferentially in distal convoluted tubules with a basolateral membrane stain in normal kidney. All 13 chromophobe RCC and 19 of 20 oncocytomas showed diffuse and strong immunoreactivity for Ksp-cadherin, while only 14% clear cell RCC and 13% papillary RCC showed focal positivity. The RCC marker expression was detected in 85%, 98%, 15% and 0% of clear cell RCC, papillary RCC, chromophobe RCC, and oncocytoma, respectively. A few clear cell RCC and papillary RCC showed dual expression of both RCC marker and Ksp-cadherin, which appear to have distinct histologic features. These results demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity of Ksp-cadherin for distal convoluted tubules, which can be used as adjunct for diagnosis of chromophobe RCC.     

Cytokeratin 7: a useful adjunct in the diagnosis of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma

AIMS: The histopathological diagnosis of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma can present a diagnostic challenge, as these tumours can resemble either conventional renal cell carcinoma or oncocytoma. The aim of this study was to determine whether cytokeratin 7 expression is of practical use in the distinction of these three entities. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 40 cases previously diagnosed as either chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, conventional renal cell carcinoma or oncocytoma were identified. A representative section of each was stained with H&E and cytokeratin 7. Following independent review of the cases by three pathologists, a consensus diagnosis for each case was reached and the pattern of cytokeratin 7 staining was assessed. There were 12 cases of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma in the study, all of which showed a characteristic peripheral membrane pattern of staining for cytokeratin 7. Seventeen of the 18 cases of conventional renal cell carcinoma studied were negative for cytokeratin 7, while one case showed weak focal staining of <5% of the cells. The 10 cases of oncocytoma showed patchy weak to moderate cytoplasmic expression of cytokeratin 7, without the characteristic peripheral membrane accentuation seen in the chromophobe carcinomas. CONCLUSIONS: Immunohistochemical staining for cytokeratin 7 appears to be a useful adjunct in the diagnosis of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, and in distinguishing this tumour from both oncocytoma and conventional renal cell carcinoma.     

Useful markers for differential diagnosis of oncocytoma, chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and conventional renal cell carcinoma

Renal oncocytoma, conventional RCC (granular cell type) and chromophobe RCC have different prognosis. Sometimes differentiation between them is difficult in HandE slides. In a 5-year study of 128 renal tumors, we selected 76 cases [30 conventional RCC (CRCC), 16 papillary RCC, 21 chromophobe RCC (ChRCC), 8 oncocytoma, 1 collecting duct carcinoma (cdc)] and staining with Hale's colloidal iron, CK7, CK8, CK18, CK19, CK20, Vimentin, EMA, CD10 and RCC marker were done. No significant difference was seen between renal tumor subtypes with CK8, CK18, CK19, CK20 and EMA. The most useful markers were Vimentin, CK7, CD10, RCC marker and Hale's colloidal iron. Hale's colloidal iron staining with diffuse reticular fine cytoplasmic pattern was present in ChRCCs, but was absent in other subtypes and oncocytomas. Vimentin, CK7, CD10, RCC marker and Hale's colloidal iron can be used for the differential diagnosis of problematic epithelial tumors of kidney (CRCC, ChRCC and oncocytoma) - i.e. ChRCC: Vimentin, CD10 and RCC marker - negative, CK7 - positive and positive diffuse fine reticular cytoplasmic pattern of Hale's colloidal iron; oncocytoma: Vimentin, CK7, RCC marker and CD10 - negative and Hale's colloidal iron - negative; CRCC: CK7 - negative, Vimentin, CD10 and RCC marker - positive and Hale's colloidal iron - negative.     

Nucleophosmin expression in renal cell carcinoma and oncocytoma

The objective of this study was to investigate nucleophosmin/B23 (NPM) expression in renal cell carcinomas (RCC) and renal oncocytomas. The expression of NPM was studied by immunohistochemical methods on 59 RCCs, 9 oncocytomas, and 19 tumour-negative renal tissues. The expression was assessed relative to various clinicopathological variables and histological subtypes, to determine its potential role as a prognostic and diagnostic marker. All tumours showed nuclear staining, and a minority also exhibited cytoplasmic immunoreactivity. Two patterns of nuclear staining were observed: nuclear staining with a prominent nucleolus (nucleolar staining) and nuclear staining without a prominent nucleolus. There were significant differences, in both nuclear staining and cytoplasmic NPM expression, between oncocytomas and chromophobe RCCs (p < 0.001) and clear cell RCCs (p < 0.001). Cytoplasmic NPM expression was markedly lower in RCCs than in oncocytomas. A statistically significant correlation was discovered between nucleolar staining and nuclear grade (p < 0.001, r = 0.5). No relationship was found between cytoplasmic expression of NPM and any of the clinicopathological parameters or survival. NPM might be a useful immunohistochemical marker for differential diagnosis between oncocytoma and chromophobe RCC. In addition, increased nucleolar NPM expression in RCCs appears to be associated with tumour progression.     

Role of carbonic anhydrase IX, α-methylacyl coenzyme a racemase,cytokeratin 7, and galectin-3 in the evaluation of renal neoplasms: a tissue microarray immunohistochemical study

Kidney tumors of various types may behave differently and have different prognosis. Because of some overlapping morphological features and immunohistochemical staining pattern, they may pose diagnostic challenge. Therefore, it is necessary to explore additional immunohistochemical stains to help classifying these epithelial neoplasms. Tissue microarrays of 20 cases each of renal cell carcinomas of clear cell, chromophobe, and papillary variants and oncocytoma were constructed and used to test a panel of immunohistochemical markers including carbonic anhydrase IX, galectin-3, cytokeratin 7 (CK7), and α-methylacyl coenzyme a racemase. Carbonic anhydrase IX was highly sensitive for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (90% positivity) and was negative in all other renal epithelial tumors except for 1 chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC). Expression of galectin-3 was found mostly in renal tumors with oncocytic features, including oncocytomas (100%) and chRCCs (89%). α-Methylacyl coenzyme a racemase was positive in papillary renal cell carcinoma (100%). CK7 was positive in papillary renal cell carcinoma (90%), chRCC (89%), and oncocytoma (90%). Although both chRCC and oncocytoma were positive for CK7, but with a different patterns, CK7 staining in chRCC was diffuse, whereas it was sporadic in oncocytoma. Panel of carbonic anhydrase IX, galectin-3, CK7, and α-methylacyl coenzyme a racemase is sensitive and specific for the differential diagnosis of the renal epithelial tumors.