Biocompatibility of poly2methoxyethylacrylate coating for cardiopulmonary bypass.

The systemic inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) may contribute to the development of postoperative complications. Heparin-coated circuits and poly2methoxyethylacrylate (PMEA)-coated circuits have been developed to reduce the risk of such complications. We compared the biocompatibility of these circuits. Twelve patients scheduled to undergo elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with CPB were assigned to CPB with a PMEA-coated circuit (PMEA-coated group, n=6) or a heparin-coated circuit (heparin-coated group, n=6). The plasma concentrations of the following inflammatory markers were measured before CPB and just after, 4 hours after, and 24 hours after the termination of CPB: cytokines (interleukin [IL]-6, IL-8, IL-10), complement factor (C3a), polymorphonuclear elastase (PMNE), and coagulofibrinolytic factors (thrombin-antithrombin III complex [TAT], D-dimer). Postoperative clinical response was evaluated on the basis of respiratory index, blood loss, and the postoperative and preoperative body-weight percent ratio. There were no significant differences between the groups in the plasma concentrations of IL-6, IL-10, C3a, PMNE, TAT, or D-dimer. Plasma IL-8 concentrations were below the assay detection limits at all time points in both groups. Clinical variables did not differ significantly between the groups. In conclusion, PMEA-coated CPB circuits are as biocompatible as heparin-coated CPB circuits and prevent postoperative organ dysfunction in patients undergoing elective CABG with CPB.     

Inflammatory response after coronary revascularization: off-pump versus on-pump (heparin-coated circuits and poly2methoxyethylacrylate-coated circuits).

OBJECTIVE: Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) may reduce the inflammatory response associated with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and contribute to minimizing postoperative complications. Heparin-coated circuits and poly2methoxyethylacrylate (PMEA)-coated circuits were developed to reduce such complications. We compared the postoperative inflammatory response with or without CPB. METHODS: Eighteen consecutive patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) were divided into three groups: OPCAB group (n=6), heparin-coated circuits group (n=6), PMEA-coated circuits group (n=6). The plasma concentrations of the following inflammatory markers were measured: cytokines [interleukin (IL-10)], polymorphonuclear elastase (PMNE), coagulofibrinolytic factor [thrombin-antithrombin III complex (TAT)], complement factor (C3a). RESULTS: At the end of CPB, IL-10 and TAT concentrations were significantly different among the three groups (OPCAB group < PMEA-coated group < heparin-coated group). The PMNE concentration was significantly lower in the OPCAB group and the heparin-coated group as compared to the PMEA-coated group both at the end of CPB and 4 hours after CPB. C3a concentration was significantly lower in the OPCAB group than in the CPB groups at the end of CPB. Clinical variables did not differ significantly among the three groups. CONCLUSION: Off-pump CABG is associated with a reduction in the inflammatory response when compared with on-pump CABG, using either PMEA-coated or heparin-coated circuits.     

Cytokine release and neutrophil activation are not prevented by heparin-coated circuits and aprotinin administration

BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) initiates a whole-body inflammatory response where complement and neutrophil activation and cytokine release play an important role. This prospective trial examined the effects of both heparin-coated circuits and aprotinin on the inflammatory processes during CPB, with respect to cytokine release and neutrophil activation. METHODS: Two hundred patients undergoing cardiac surgery were randomized in four groups of 50 patients each: heparin-coated circuit with aprotinin (HCO-A) or without aprotinin (HCO) administration, and uncoated circuit with aprotinin (C-A) or without aprotinin administration (C). In groups receiving aprotinin, a high-dose regimen was given. In all groups, high initial doses of heparin were used (3 mg/kg intravenously). Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and IL-8, and myeloperoxidase and elastase levels were measured in plasma samples taken before, during, and after CPB. RESULTS: In all groups, the TNF-alpha, IL-6, and IL-8 levels reached a maximum after protamine administration. After 24 hours, they remained significantly elevated (IL-6 and IL-8) or returned to baseline values (TNF-alpha). A similar pattern was observed with myeloperoxidase and elastase levels. No significant intergroup differences were observed. CONCLUSIONS: CPB is associated with cytokine release and neutrophil activation, which are not attenuated by the use of heparin-coated circuits or by the administration of aprotinin. Aprotinin and heparin-coated circuits do not show additive effects.     

Influence of two different perfusion systems on inflammatory response in pediatric heart surgery

BACKGROUND: This study tests the hypothesis that a cardiopulmonary bypass system that combines complete heparin-coating, a centrifugal pump, and a closed circuit in comparison with a conventional system (uncoated system, roller pump, and hard shell venous reservoir) attenuates the inflammatory response in pediatric heart surgery. METHODS: In a prospective randomized controlled clinical study 40 consecutive children weighing 10 kg or less were included and divided into two groups. Concentrations of complement proteins (C3a, sC5b-9, C4d, and Bb), granulocyte degranulation products (polymorphonuclear [PMN] elastase), and proinflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor [TNF]-alpha, interleukin [IL]-6, and IL-8) were measured. RESULTS: C3a and sC5b-9 concentrations were lower (C3a, p < 0.001; sC5b-9, p = 0.01) in the combined (heparin-coated/centrifugal pump/closed reservoir) group, the peak values being 58% and 37% of conventional group values. The Bb- and C4d-fragment values indicated activation of the complement system through the alternative pathway in both groups. PMN elastase concentrations were lower (p = 0.02) in the combined group, the peak values being 43% of conventional group values. There were no significant intergroup differences regarding TNF-alpha, IL-6, or IL-8 concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a fully heparin-coated system, a centrifugal pump, and a closed circuit during CPB in children (10 kg or less) leads to a lower degree of complement activation and PMN elastase release compared with a conventional system.     

A new poly-2-methoxyethylacrylate-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuit possesses superior platelet preservation and inflammatory suppression efficacy

BACKGROUND: Poly-2-methoxyethylacrylate (PMEA) is a new coating material, and several studies have revealed that PMEA-coated cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuits have good biocompatibility. This study sought to compare this biocompatibility with those of heparin-coated and noncoated circuits. METHODS: Forty-five patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting were randomly assigned to PMEA-coated (group P, n = 15), heparin-coated (group H, n = 15), or noncoated (group N, n = 15) circuit groups. Clinical data and the following markers were analyzed: (1) platelet preservation by number of platelets; (2) complement (C) activation by C3a and C4a levels; (3) inflammatory response by interleukin-6 (IL-6) and interleukin-8 (IL-8) levels. RESULTS: Platelet numbers were significantly preserved in group P compared with groups N and H. Postoperative blood loss did not differ among the groups. During CPB, C3a values were significantly lower in group H (536 +/- 145 ng/mL) than in group P (1,458 +/- 433 ng/mL, p < 0.01) and group N (1,815 +/- 845 ng/mL, p < 0.01). The C4a values did not differ 60 minutes after CPB initiation among the groups. The IL-6 and IL-8 levels were significantly lower in group P and group H than in group N. CONCLUSIONS: The PMEA coating was superior to heparin coating and noncoating in preserving platelets, and was equivalent to heparin coating in terms of the perioperative clinical course and inhibition of inflammatory cytokines, but slightly inferior in reducing complement activation.     

Biocompatibility of heparin-coated extracorporeal bypass circuits: new heparin bonded bioline system

Biocompatibility of a new type of heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass equipment, the Bioline, was evaluated in coronary artery bypass surgery cases. The heparin-coated (H) group (n = 15; Quadrox Bioline oxygenator/reservior and Carmeda BioMedicus BP-80 centrifugal pump) was compared with the nonheparin-coated (N) group (n = 12; uncoated, otherwise similar oxygenator, centrifugal pump, tubing, and filter set). Both groups used full systemic heparinization. The peak values of neutrophil elastase, C3a, IL-6, and IL-8 at 2 h after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), and C3a levels at the end of CPB and at 2 h after CPB were significantly reduced in the H group compared with those of the N group. However, no statistically significant intergroup differences were observed in thrombin-antithrombin complex, D-dimer, beta-thromboglobulin, or platelet factor-4. No significant differences were observed in hemostasis time, postoperative 12 h blood loss, required amount of blood transfusion, or intubation time. In conclusion, the Bioline demonstrated partially improved biocompatibility, in terms of leukocyte and complement activation, and proinflammatory cytokine production. However, it did not improve platelet activation, coagulation, or fibrinolysis cascade under full systemic heparinization. As a result, the clinical beneficial impact seemed to be the minimum.     

Heparin-coated Cardiopulmonary Bypass Circuits in Coronary Bypass Surgery

Abstract: Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is a nonphysiologic environment for an organism. The damage of blood components may also lead to organ dysfunction, sometimes recognized as postperfusion syndrome. One possible way to diminish the risk of these complications would be to reduce the thorombogenicity and to improve the biocompatibility of the artificial surfaces by using a heparin-coated CPB circuit. In this study, we compared a heparin-coated CPB circuit with a noncoated CPB circuit in terms of biocompatibility in 20 patients undergoing elective coronary bypass surgery. We employed a Dura-flo II (n = 10) as a heparin-coated CPB circuit and a Univox IC (n = 10) as control subjects. Ten patients (Group C) were operated on using the heparin-coated CPB circuit. A total of 10 patients were given heparin in a reduced dose (2.0 mg/kg), and additional heparin was given if the activated clotting time (ACT) was below 400 s. The control group also included 10 patients (Group NC), who were operated on with noncoated devices. They received 2.5 mg/kg of heparin, and additional heparin was given if the ACT was below 450 s. All patients had normal coagulation parameters and did not receive blood transfusion. We measured complement activation levels (C3a, C4a), platelet count, thrombin-antithrombin III complex levels, D-dimer levels, and ACT during CPB and respiratory index postoperatively. The concentration of C3a in group NC was significantly higher than that in group C. Platelet reduction in group NC was significantly greater than that in group C. There were no significant differences in the remaining parameters between the 2 groups. We concluded that heparin-coated CPB circuits improved biocompatibility by reducing complement activation and platelet consumption and enabled us to reduce the dose of heparin required for systemic heparinization.     

Thrombin Generation During Cardiopulmonary Bypass Using Heparin-Coated or Standard Circuits

For quantitative comparison of thrombin generation during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with heparin-coated vs conventional CPB circuits, thrombin-antithrombin III complex (TAT) and prothrombin fragment 1+2 (F₁₊₂) were analyzed in 20 patients undergoing combined heart valve surgery and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), in ten cases with heparin-coated circuits (COMB-HC) and in ten with standard circuits (COMB-C). Extensive thrombin generation was found in both groups, with maximal TAT and F₁₊₂ levels at the end of CPB. Of 15 operations with only CABG, seven were performed with heparin-coated circuits and heparin dose 40% of normal (CABG-HC), and eight with standard circuits and normal heparin doses (CABG-C). TAT was maximal at the end of CPB and F₁₊₂ peaked 3 hours after protamine injection. At the end of CPB both levels were significantly higher in the CABG-HC than in the CABG-C group, though thrombin generation was less than in the COMB groups. The abundant thrombin generation during CPB thus was much more pronounced during complex operations. Use of heparin-coated circuits did not reduce thrombin generation, which was increased by 60% reduction of the systemic heparin dose. The clinical implications are still unknown, as no complications were observed.     

Effects of Heparin Coating of Cardiopulmonary Bypass Circuits on In Vitro Oxygen Free Radical Production During Coronary Bypass Surgery

Abstract During cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) oxygen free radicals (OFR) are formed, which can mediate reactions damaging tissue components. Blood contact with artificial surfaces during CPB leads to an activation of leukocytes, which are one of the sources of the OFR. Heparin coating of the CPB circuit reduces granulocyte activation. In the present study, the heparin-coated circuits with noncoated cardiotomy reservoirs (Group HC) were compared with noncoated, otherwise similar CPB sets (Group C). In each group, 8 patients were operated on for coronary revascularization. The release of granulocyte granule proteins myeloperoxidase (MPO) and lac-toferrin (LF) was evaluated. Production of OFR in the whole blood and in the granulocyte suspension were measured by chemiluminescence (CL). In both groups the whole blood CL declined during CPB. The whole blood CL induced by serum-opsonized zymosan, when enhanced by luminol, was significantly lower in Group HC at 45 min after CPB start (68 ± 6% of initial values in Group HC vs. 87 ± 6% in Group C, mean ± SEM) and 30 min after protaminization (54 ± 6% of initial values in Group HC vs. 72 ± 6% in Group C, mean ± SEM), and CL was significantly higher in Group HC at CPB end (83 ± 5% of initial values in Group HC vs. 67 ± 5% in Group C, mean ± SEM) when enhanced by lucigenin. CL of isolated granulocytes showed no significant differences between the groups. Release of MPO at CPB end and of LF 45 min after start of CPB and at CPB end were significantly lower in the heparin-coated CPB circuits.     

Heparin-Coated Cardiopulmonary Bypass Circuit: Clinical Effects in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery

OBJECTIVES: Heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuits have been reported to reduce complement activation and the inflammatory response associated with CPB. We retrospectively compared patients utilizing heparin-coated perfusion circuits with those using noncoated circuits to determine the clinical effects of the different circuits in pediatric cardiac surgery. METHODS: Between July 1995 and July 1997, 203 patients weighing < 10 kg underwent cardiac surgery, 153 patients using heparin-coated bypass circuits and 50 patients using noncoated circuits. The 50 patients operated on with the noncoated circuit (Group N) were matched to 100 patients operated on with coated circuits (Group H) in age, weight, and type of procedure. Urine output during bypass, blood products used after bypass, postoperative ventilation days, hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality were compared between these groups. RESULTS: Body weight, perfusion time, and procedure time were not different between the two groups. Urine output during bypass was notably greater in Group H than in Group N (11.3 +/- 10.5 mL/kg per hour vs 4.8 +/- 3.1 mL/kg per hour, respectively, p < 0.0001). Postoperative mechanical ventilation markedly decreased in Group H (Group H vs N = 2.8 +/- 2.7 days vs 5.1 +/- 7.5 days, respectively, p < 0.05). Red blood cell usage, hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality were not statistically different, although there was a tendency toward decreased transfusion of red cell and platelets in Group H (Group H vs N = 61.2 +/- 121.1 mL/kg vs 102.0 +/- 176.7 mL/kg, respectively, in red cell, p = 0.15; and Group H vs N = 7.9 +/- 13.7 mL/kg vs 13.2 +/- 24.5 mL/kg, respectively, in platelets, p = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: Patients operated on with the use of heparin-coated circuits had increased urine output during bypass and required less time postoperatively on the ventilator. These results suggest a reduction in the acute inflammatory response, capillary leakage, and overall systemic edema. We now routinely use coated circuits on all pediatric pump cases.     

Heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits reduce circulating complement factors and interleukin-6 in paediatric heart surgery

Children are sensitive to the inflammatory side effects of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Our intention was to investigate if the biocompatibility benefits of heparin-coated CPB circuits apply to children. In 20 operations, 19 children were randomized to heparin-coated (group HC, n = 10) or standard (group C, n = 10) bypass circuits. Plasma levels of acute phase reactants, interleukins, granulocytic proteins and complement factors were measured. All were significantly elevated after CPB. Levels of complement factor C3a (851 (791-959)ng/ml [median with quartiles] in group C, 497 (476-573)ng/ml in group HC, p < 0.001), Terminal Complement Complex (114 (71-130) AU/ml in group C, 35.5 (28.9-51.4) AU/ml in group HC, p < 0.001), and interleukin-6 (570 (203-743) pg/ml in group C, 168 (111-206)pg/ml in group HC, p = 0.005), were significantly reduced in group HC. Heparin-coated CPB circuits improve the biocompatibility of CPB during heart surgery in the paediatric patient population, as reflected by significantly reduced levels of circulating complement factors and interleukin-6.     

Circulating Cytokines and Granulocyte-Derived Enzymes During Complex Heart Surgery: A Clinical Study with Special Reference to Heparin-Coating of Cardiopulmonary Bypass Circuits

Blood contact with artificial surfaces during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) triggers a systemic inflammatory response in which complement, granulocytes and cytokines play a major role. Heparin-coated CPB circuits were recently shown to reduce complement and granulocyte activation in such circumstances. The present study comprised 20 complex heart operations, 10 with heparin-coated circuits (group HC) and 10 controls (group C), with evaluation of changes in terminal complement complex, the granulocyte enzymes myeloperoxidase and lactoferrin, and the cytokines interleukin-6 (IL-6) and interleukin-8 (IL-8). Standard heparin dose and uncoated cardiotomy reservoir were used in all cases. In both groups the levels of enzymes and terminal complement complex rose significantly, beginning at conclusion of CPB, above base values, without significant intergroup differences. IL-6 and IL-8 also increased significantly, but tended to be lower in the HC group, starting at CPB end and continuing until 20 hours postoperatively: for IL-6 the difference was significant at CPB end (83 ± 18 vs 197 ± 39 μg/1, p = 0.21). Significantly increased inflammatory response was thus found during complex heart operations even with use of heparin-coated CPB sets. The heparin-coating of circuits seems to diminish cytokine production.     

Biocompatibility of Heparin-Coated Membrane Oxygenator During Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Abstract: The biocompatibility of the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuit, in which an oxygenator is solely heparinized, was assessed by systemic inflammatory reactions as an indicator during CPB. Fourteen patients, 11 males and 3 females, underwent coronary artery bypass surgery and were randomly divided into 2 groups of 7 patients each. For the heparin–coated oxygenator group (Group H), a heparin–coated membrane oxygenator was used in the CPB circuit, and in the control (Group C) an uncoated membrane oxygenator was employed. Systemic inflammatory reactions, such as platelet activation, prostaglandin production, complement activation, and activated granulocyte released substance, were measured prior to, during, and 6 h after CPB. The number of platelets decreased after protamine administration in both groups (14. 5 ±4. 7 times 10⁴/μl in Group H and 13. 8 ± 8. 7 times 10⁴/μd in Group C) and returned to baseline levels in Group H while it remained decreased in Group C at 6 h after CPB. The platelet factor 4 level was significantly lower in Group H (181 ± 40 ng/ml) than in Group C (297 ±131 ng/ml) after protamine administration. Thromboxane–B₂ (TXB₂) rose during CPB in both groups; however, there were significantly different levels of TXB₂ between the 2 groups at 60 min after CPB (293±258 pg/ml in Group H versus 408 ± 120 pg/ml in Group C) and after protamine administration (259 ± 122 pg/ml in Group H versus 709 ± 418 pg/ml in Group C). Plasma concentrations of granulocyte elastase were significantly lower in Group H at 30, 60 and 90 min, immediately after, and post–CPB than those of Group C. Although the oxygenator was solely heparinized in the CPB circuit, it was sufficiently effective to reduce inflammatory reactions during coronary artery bypass operation, and the heparin–coated surface seems to be more endothelium–like.     

Biocompatibility of heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits in coronary patients with left ventricular dysfunction is superior to PMEA-coated circuits

BACKGROUND: Several coating techniques for extracorporeal circulation have been developed to diminish the systemic inflammatory response during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and biocompatibility of heparin-coated and poly-2-methoxyethylacrylate (PMEA)-coated CPB circuits on coronary patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. METHODS: Thirty-six patients who underwent elective coronary artery bypass grafting were divided into two equal groups: group H (n = 18), heparin-coated; group P (n = 18), PMEA coated. Clinical outcomes, hematologic variables, cardiac enzymes, malondialdehyde (MDA), and acute phase inflammatory response (including myeloperoxidase (MPO), catalase, hsCRP, and IL-8) were analyzed perioperatively. RESULTS: Demographic, CPB, and clinical outcome data were similar for both groups. Plasma fibrinogen, total protein, albumin, and platelet count decreased, neutrophil count, MDA, IL-8, MPO, and catalase levels increased during CPB. During CPB, MPO and catalase values were significantly higher in group P (p = 0.02 and p = 0.01) and postoperative MDA concentration was lower in group H (p = 0.03). Platelet counts were better preserved in group H during and after CPB but neutrophil count and IL-8 level did not differ between the groups. Postoperative total protein, albumin, and fibrinogen levels were higher in group H (p < 0.05). The postoperative first day levels of troponin-I, CK-MB, and CRP increased in both groups without any significant differences between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Heparin-coated circuit provided better suppression of perioperative inflammatory markers and exhibited more favorable effects on hematologic variables than PMEA-coated circuit.     

Heparin-coated Cardiopulmonary Bypass Circuits Reduce Circulating Complement Factors and Interleukin-6 in Paediatric Heart Surgery

Children are sensitive to the inflammatory side effects of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Our intention was to investigate if the biocompatibility benefits of heparin-coated CPB circuits apply to children. In 20 operations, 19 children were randomized to heparin-coated (group HC, n = 10) or standard (group C, n = 10) bypass circuits. Plasma levels of acute phase reactants, interleukins, granulocytic proteins and complement factors were measured. All were significantly elevated after CPB. Levels of complement factor C3a (851 (791-959) ng/ml [median with quartiles] in group C, 497 (476-573) ng/ml in group HC, p &lt; 0.001), Terminal Complement Complex (114 (71-130) AU/ml in group C, 35.5 (28.9-51.4) AU/ml in group HC, p &lt; 0.001), and interleukin-6 (570 (203-743) pg/ml in group C, 168 (111-206) pg/ml in group HC, p = 0.005), were significantly reduced in group HC. Heparin-coated CPB circuits improve the biocompatibility of CPB during heart surgery in the paediatric patient population, as reflected by significantly reduced levels of circulating complement factors and interleukin-6.     

Changes in Platelet, Granulocyte, and Complement Activation During Cardiopulmonary Bypass Using Heparin-coated Equipment

Abstract: The effects of heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) systems on platelet, granulocyte, and complement activation were investigated during cardiopulmonary bypass. Thirty patients underwent coronary artery bypass surgery with a heparin-coated (Carmeda Bio-Active Surface, CBAS, Medtronic, U.S.A.) CPB system (HC group, n = 10), a heparin-coated oxygenator and uncoated CPB circuit (HO group, n = 10), or an uncoated system (UC group, n = 10). In the HO group, plasma C3a (1667 ± 632 ng/ml) and C4a (1088 ± 319 ng/ml) concentrations were significantly (p < 0.05) lower than in the UC group (2846 ± 1045 ng/ml and 1494 ± 480 ng/ml, respectively) 10 min after the administration of protamine, but there were no significant differences in the platelet or granulocyte counts. In the HC group, granulocyte elastase concentrations 120 min after the onset of CPB (365 ± 177 μg/L) and 10 min after the administration of protamine (676 ± 314 μg/L) were significantly (p < 0.05) lower than in the other 2 groups (820 ± 341 and 893 ± 303 μg/L and 1365 ± 595 and 1,258 ± 622 μg/L). In addition, the increase in the plasma C3a concentration in the HC group 60 (p < 0.05) and 120 min after the onset of CPB (p < 0.05) was significantly less than in the other 2 groups. The C3a and C4a concentrations 10 min after the administration of protamine were significantly (p < 0.005 and p < 0.05) less in the HC group than in the UC group. Platelet counts 10 min after the administration of protamine were significantly higher (p < 0.05) and plasma β-throm-boglobulin concentrations during CPB were significantly lower in the HC group than in the other 2 groups 5 (p < 0.05), 60, and 120 min (p < 0.005) after the onset of CPB. Postoperative blood loss during the first 12 h in the HC group was significantly (p < 0.05) less than that in the UC group. The heparin-coated oxygenator and uncoated CPB circuit reduced complement activation but demonstrated no significant effects on the platelet and granulocyte systems. However, the heparin-coated CPB circuit (with all components making blood contact) reduced platelet, granulocyte, and complement activation and significantly reduced postoperative blood loss. Therefore, heparin coating of CPB systems improves biocompatibility.     

Heparin-level-based anticoagulation management during cardiopulmonary bypass: a pilot investigation on the effects of a half-dose aprotinin protocol on postoperative blood loss and hemostatic activation and inflammatory response

Cardiac surgery involving cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) leads to activation of the hemostatic/inflammatory system. We compared the influence of a half-dose aprotinin regimen on postoperative blood loss and the activation of the hemostatic/inflammatory system during CPB, when used during a heparin-level-based heparin management for cardiac surgery. Two-hundred patients (n = 100 in each group) were enrolled in this randomized prospective study. In Group I only heparin was given according to the results of the Hepcon HMS Plus. In Group II aprotinin was added with a bolus of 1 x 10(6) kallikrein inhibiting units (KIU) for the patient immediately before initiation of CPB, 1 x 10(6) KIU in the priming solution of the CPB, and a continuous infusion of 250,000 KIU/h during CPB. Postoperative blood loss was determined after 12 h. Heparin and antithrombin activity were evaluated by an anti-Xa assay and measurement of antithrombin III activity. Hemostatic activation was evaluated by adenosine diphosphate-stimulated platelet aggregometry and by measurements of the generation/release of beta-thromboglobulin (beta-TG), soluble P-selectin (sPS), thrombin (TAT), prothrombin 1 and 2 fragments (PTF1+2), factor XIIa (FXIIa), plasmin (PAP), and D-dimers. Inflammatory response was evaluated by measuring complement factors 5b-9 (C5b-9), interleukin (IL)-6, and neutrophil elastase (NE). There were no differences in the pre-CPB values or duration of CPB between the two groups. There were no differences in the post-CPB values for platelet count, platelet aggregation, beta-TG, sPS, TAT, PTF1+2, C5b-9, NE, or IL-6. The additional use of aprotinin resulted in a significant decrease of PAP, D-dimers, and 12 h postoperative blood loss, whereas generation of the contact factor XIIa was increased. The administration of aprotinin significantly reduced postoperative blood loss after cardiac surgery and CPB. This most likely has to be attributed to the antifibrinolytic effects of aprotinin. No effects on thrombin generation, platelet activation, inflammatory response, or clinical outcome were noted. IMPLICATIONS: The use of half-dose aprotinin and heparin-level-based anticoagulation management during cardiopulmonary bypass leads to a significant reduction of postoperative blood loss after cardiac surgery. This effect can most likely be attributed to the antifibrinolytic effects of aprotinin, as we did not observe effects on other variables of activation of the hemostatic/inflammatory system.     

Reducing hemostatic activation during cardiopulmonary bypass: a combined approach

Interventions such as heparin-coated circuits, epsilon-aminocaproic acid, and reduced shed blood reinfusion have shown mixed results when applied individually for limiting hemostatic activation during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). We compared coagulation and fibrinolytic activation during conventional CPB (control) (CTRL) using noncoated circuits, no antifibrinolytics, and open cardiotomy with a combined strategy (HAC) that used heparin-coated circuits, epsilon-aminocaproic acid, and closed cardiotomy. Blood samples were drawn before, during, and after CPB for primary coronary bypass grafting surgery from 9 CTRL patients and 10 HAC patients. Thrombin-antithrombin complex and fibrinopeptide A levels (markers of thrombin and fibrin generation) were reduced in the HAC versus CTRL group after 30 min of CPB (P < 0.05). Average tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) levels were significantly lower in the HAC group by 30 min on CPB (P < 0.05), resulting in preservation of plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI)-1 during CPB (P < 0.05). D-Dimer, a measure of intravascular fibrin formation and removal, was reduced in the HAC group during and after CPB (P < 0.005). Overall, the combined strategy was associated with a reduction in CPB-induced increases in markers of thrombin generation, fibrin formation, tPA release, and fibrin degradation and better preservation of PAI-1. IMPLICATIONS: A combined approach during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) that uses heparin-coated circuits, epsilon-aminocaproic acid, and limited reinfusion of shed pericardial blood is associated with reduced activation of the coagulation and fibrinolytic systems that typically occurs during conventional CPB.     

The impact of heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits on pulmonary function and the release of inflammatory mediators

Reduction of the inflammatory reaction with the use of heparin coating has been found during and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The question remains whether this reduced reaction also decreases the magnitude of CPB-induced pulmonary dysfunction. We therefore evaluated the effects of a heparin-coated circuit versus a similar uncoated circuit on pulmonary indices as well as on inflammatory markers of complement activation (C3b/c), elastase-alpha(1)-antitrypsin complex, and secretory phospholipase A(2) (sPLA(2)) during and after CPB. Fifty-one patients were randomly assigned into two groups undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with either a heparin-coated (Group 1) or an uncoated (Group 2) circuit. During CPB, a continuous positive airway pressure of 5 cm H(2)O and a fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO(2)) of 0.21 were maintained. Differences in favor of the coated circuit were found in pulmonary shunt fraction (P < 0.05), pulmonary vascular resistance index (P < 0.05), and PaO(2)/FIO(2) ratio (P < 0.05) after CPB and in the intensive care unit. During and after CPB, the coated group demonstrated lower levels of sPLA(2). After CPB, C3b/c and the elastase-alpha(1)-antitrypsin complex were significantly less in the coated group (P < 0.001). The coated circuit was associated with a reduced inflammatory response, decreased pulmonary vascular resistance index and pulmonary shunt fraction, and increased PaO(2)/FIO(2) ratio, suggesting that the coated circuit may have beneficial effects on pulmonary function. The correlation with sPLA(2), leukocyte activation, and postoperative leukocyte count suggests reduced activation of pulmonary capillary endothelial cells. IMPLICATIONS: Heparin coating of the extracorporeal circuit reduces the inflammatory response during cardiopulmonary bypass. Analysis of indices of pulmonary function indicates that use of heparin coating may result in less impaired gas exchange.     

Coagulation and fibrinolysis system in pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass

Coagulation and fibrinolysis system was evaluated during and after pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB. Twenty-two atrial septal defect (ASD) patients were surgically repaired under CPB and aortic cross-clamp through right thoracotomy. Drainage was established by gravity, CPB flow was kept 2.4 l/min/m2 and ACT was controlled over 400 seconds. HCT, PLT, fibrinogen, AT-III, D-dimer, thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT), alpha2 plasmin inhibitor-plasmin complex (PIC), and plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1) were measured at 6 points [after induction of anesthesia, 10 minutes after initiating CPB, end of CPB, on the entrance of intensive care unit (ICU), postoperative day (POD) 1, and at outpatient division]. Both fibrinogen and AT-III showed low values during CPB (121.9 +/- 22.0 mg/dl, 57.6 +/- 10.6%). D-dimer increased at 1 week postoperatively in all patients (5.57 +/- 3.45 microg/ml). There were significantly positive correlations between CPB duration and TAT value at the end of CPB (r = 0.88, p < 0.01), on the entrance of ICU (r = 0.71, p < 0.01). There was also a positive correlation between CPB duration and PIC value on the entrance of ICU (r = 0.53, p < 0.01). Five patients showed high PAI-1 value on the entrance of ICU, which remained high in 2 of them on POD 1. The outcomes from the current study suggest that there is a potential of coagulation-dominant disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) during pediatric CPB even in ASD patients who do not need long CPB. Longer CPB and severe hemodilution might become risk factors.