Triple Therapy for the Management of COPD: A Review

Triple therapy for COPD consists of a long-acting anti-cholinergic bronchodilator, a long-acting beta-agonist bronchodilator, and an inhaled corticosteroid. Guidelines from the Canadian Thoracic Society advocate triple therapy for some patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. The objective of this review was to evaluate the evidence based clinical efficacy of triple therapy compared to dual bronchodilator therapy (long-acting anti-cholinergic bronchodilator + beta-agonist bronchodilator) or long-acting anti-cholinergic bronchodilator monotherapy for managing COPD. A systematic literature search was conducted to identify relevant clinical evaluations of triple therapy in the management of moderate to severe COPD. Databases searched included: Medline; EMBASE; CINAHL and PubMed (non-Medline records only). Of 2,314 publications, 4 articles evaluated triple therapy for the management of COPD. Hospitalization rates for COPD exacerbations, reported in 2 trials, were significantly reduced with triple therapy compared to long-acting anti-cholinergic bronchodilator monotherapy, with reported relative risks of 0.53 (95% CI: 0.33, 0.86, p = 0.01) and 0.35 (95% CI: 0.16–0.78, p = 0.011). Exacerbation data is inconsistent between the two trials reporting this outcome. Lung function, dyspnea and quality of life data show statistical significant changes with triple therapy compared to long-acting anti-cholinergic bronchodilator monotherapy but the changes do not reach clinical importance. Triple therapy does decrease the number of hospitalizations for severe/acute COPD exacerbations compared with long-acting anti-cholinergic bronchodilator monotherapy. There is insufficient evidence to determine if triple therapy is superior to dual bronchodilator therapy.     

The Airway Pathophysiology of COPD: Implications for Treatment

The pathophysiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is complex and can be attributed to multiple components: mucociliary dysfunction, airway inflammation and structural changes, all contributing to the development of airflow limitation, as well as an important systemic component. Current pharmacotherapies vary in their ability to address the underlying multi-component nature of COPD. Long-acting anticholinergics and long-acting β₂-agonists (LABAs) can both provide effective and convenient bronchodilation in moderate COPD (Stage II–GOLD) and are recommended as regular therapy in global treatment guidelines. However, there is evidence to suggest that LABAs can mediate additional benefits independent of their bronchodilatory effects and may help address the multi-component nature of COPD. Effects on mucociliary dysfunction and reduced bacterial-induced damage have been experimentally proven with LABAs, and anti-inflammatory activity and structural effects have also been suggested. The use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) is now recommended for the treatment of COPD patients with frequent exacerbations. In addition, ICSs provide a range of anti-inflammatory effects in COPD and thus have effects that are complementary to those of LABAs. Recent data indicate that LABA/ICS combinations produce wide-ranging clinical benefits that are greater than with either agent alone. Other new strategies include selective phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitors, which in addition to anti-inflammatory activity, have been shown to provide bronchodilation in COPD. In summary, the potential to address the multicomponent nature of COPD with strategies such as LABA/ICS combination therapy, and the development of new treatments directed at novel targets means that the future for sufferers of COPD can be more optimistic.     

噻托溴铵替代ICS/LABA治疗极重度频繁发作COPD疗效的回顾性分析

目的探讨噻托溴铵策略性替代ICS/LABA治疗极重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD表型为C型或D型)的临床疗效。方法根据入组标准和排除标准选取2010年1月至2014年1月在我院进行治疗的COPD患者88例,38例患者选择停用ICS/LABA,换用噻托溴铵治疗(噻托溴铵组);50例患者选择继续使用ICS/LABA治疗(ICS/LABA组),观察并比较两组患者治疗前后1年的COPD年急性加重次数、年住院次数、肺功能下降速率(FEV_1的下降速率)。结果两组患者入组时在性别、年龄、COPD患病时间(年)、吸烟时间(年)、是否戒烟、肺功能(FEV_1、FEV_1/预计值%、FVC、FEV_1/FVC%)、过去1年急性加重次数及住院次数方面差异无统计学意义(P0.05),具有可比性。与1年前相比,噻托溴铵组年急性加重次数及年住院次数明显减少(P0.05),肺功能下降速率明显下降(P0.05)。1年后噻托溴铵组患者年急性加重次数、年住院次数及肺功能下降速率均明显低于ICS/LABA组,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论对于极重度COPD(慢性阻塞性肺疾病表型为C型或D型)患者,噻托溴铵的疗效优于ICS/LABA,可以降低肺功能下降速率、减少急性加重及住院次数。     

Triple versus LAMA/LABA combination therapy for Japanese patients with COPD: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundIn symptomatic COPD patients with a history of exacerbations, additional treatment with inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) to long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) and long-acting beta-agonist (LABA) combination therapy is recommended based on the evidence of low incidence of exacerbations but with a caution for pneumonia. However, ethnic differences may affect the response to drugs. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this treatment in the Japanese population (PROSPERO: CRD42020191978).MethodsWe searched relevant randomized control trials and analyzed the exacerbations, quality of life, lung function, and adverse events including pneumonia and mortality as the outcomes of interest.ResultsWe identified a total of three RCTs (N = 632). Treatment with ICS/LAMA/LABA triple therapy significantly decreased the exacerbations (rate ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.85) and improved the trough FEV₁ (mean difference, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.07) compared to LAMA/LABA therapy. However, triple therapy showed a significantly higher incidence of pneumonia compared to LAMA/LABA (odds ratio, 3.38; 95% CI, 1.58 to 7.22). Concerning other adverse events including mortality, there were no significant difference between these therapies.ConclusionsIn the current meta-analysis of the Japanese population, we confirmed that triple therapy causes a higher incidence of pneumonia than LAMA/LABA treatment but is a more preferable treatment since it showed a lower incidence of exacerbations and higher trough FEV₁ in patients with symptomatic moderate to severe COPD. However, since the sample sizes were not statistically large enough, further trials involving Japanese patients are needed.     

Effect of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (250/50 microg) or salmeterol (50 microg) on COPD exacerbations

OBJECTIVES: COPD exacerbations are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. This randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter study evaluated the effect of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250/50 and salmeterol 50 microg twice daily on moderate to severe exacerbations. METHODS: Patients received standardized treatment with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250/50 during a 1-month run-in, followed by randomization to fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250/50 or salmeterol for 12 months. Moderate to severe exacerbations were defined as worsening symptoms of COPD requiring treatment with oral corticosteroids, antibiotics, or hospitalization. RESULTS: In 782 patients with COPD (mean FEV(1)=0.94+/-0.36 L, 33% predicted normal), treatment with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250/50 significantly reduced (1) the annual rate of moderate to severe exacerbations by 30.5% compared with salmeterol (1.06 and 1.53 per subject per year, respectively, p<0.001), (2) the risk of time to first exacerbation by 25% (hazard ratio=0.750, p=0.003) and (3) the annual rate of exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroids by 40% (p<0.001). Clinical improvements observed during run-in treatment with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250/50 were better maintained over 12 months with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250/50 than salmeterol. Adverse events were reported for a similar percentage of subjects across groups. A higher reporting of pneumonia was observed with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250/50 than salmeterol (7% vs. 4%). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250/50 is more effective than salmeterol at reducing the rate of moderate to severe exacerbations over 1 year. The benefits of this reduction relative to the risk of a higher incidence of reported pneumonia should be considered. This study supports the use of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250/50 for the reduction of COPD exacerbations in patients with COPD.     

Treatment Pathways Before and After Triple Therapy in COPD: A Population-based Study in Primary Care in Spain

BackgroundRecent data from real world clinical practices on the use of Triple Therapy (TT) in patients with COPD are scarce.MethodsObservational population-based study with longitudinal follow-up in patients with COPD identified in a primary care electronic medical records database in Catalonia, covering 80% of the general population. The aims were to characterize COPD patients who initiated TT and to describe treatment pathways before and after TT initiation. Time to and probability of step down or complete discontinuation of TT was described using restricted mean survival time and Kaplan–Meier analysis.ResultsA total of 34,018 COPD patients initiated TT during the study period. Of them, 23,867 (70.1%) were GOLD A/B. 18,453 (54.2%) were non-exacerbators, 9931 (29.2%) infrequent exacerbators, 5634 (16.5%) frequent exacerbators and 1923 (5.6%) had asthma-COPD overlap. Drugs most frequently used prior to initiation of TT were long-acting antimuscarinics (22.5%) and combination of long-acting beta2 agonists/inhaled corticosteroids (15.2%). A total of 11,666 (34.3%) stepped down and 1091 (3.2%) discontinued TT during follow-up. Step down following TT was more likely in patients with severe COPD, especially during the first year; however, discontinuation was more common among patients with mild COPD.ConclusionMost patients initiating treatment with TT were non exacerbators and continued on the same treatment over time regardless severity of disease. Stepping down was more frequent in severe patients, while discontinuation was more common among mild patients. Overall, it appears that TT is extensively used in primary care for treatment of patients with COPD.     

Outcomes of Pulmonary Rehabilitation for COPD in Older Patients: A Comparative Study

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is established as an effective intervention in optimising function and quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, there are very limited data on the effectiveness of PR in older patients with COPD. We reviewed all patients attending an 8-week outpatient programme. Patients were divided into two groups; Group A (n = 202), below 70 years, and Group B (n = 122), above 70 years of age. Outcomes in both patient subgroups were compared using FEV¹, Incremental Shuttle Walk Test (ISWT), Endurance Shuttle Walk Test (ESWT), Grip Strength, St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score (HADS), and COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score. Statistical analysis was conducted using Mann-Whitney non-parametric testing and chi-square testing for comparison of clinically relevant improvements between groups. There was no significant difference in PR outcomes between Group A and Group B using absolute values. Mean changes in ISWT for Groups A and B 39.7 m vs. 32.8 m (p = 0.63), respectively, SGRQ ?2.5 vs. ?2.8 (p = 0.95), HADS anxiety score ?0.83 vs. ?0.57 (p = 0.43) and HADS depression score ?0.69 vs. ?0.39 (p = 0.48), respectively. There was no difference in the proportion of patients who achieved the minimal clinically significant improvement in Group A versus Group B for parameters ISWT (38.6% vs 42.7%), SGRQ (27.8% vs 21.3%), and HADS total score (20.5% vs 28.1%). These data suggest that benefits of PR in COPD are not age dependent. Age should not be a barrier to enrolling patients with COPD in PR programmes.     

High Flow Nasal Therapy Use in Patients with Acute Exacerbation of COPD and Bronchiectasis: A Feasibility Study

Abstract

The efficacy and feasibility of high flow nasal therapy (HFNT) use in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) and bronchiectasis is unknown. We performed a single-center, single-arm prospective observational study in patients with AECOPD, documented bronchiectasis, pH ≥ 7.35, respiratory rate (RR) ≥ 26 breaths/minute despite receiving maximal medical treatment and oxygen via face mask up to 10?L/m. Patients received HFNT (Airvo 2, Fisher & Paykel) at a gas flow of 50?L/min and FIO₂ adjusted to maintain SpO₂ ≥92%. Dyspnea, rated by Borg scale, RR, arterial blood gases and mucus production (ranging from 1 to 3) were collected before and 1?h after starting HFNT and then every 24?h for 3?days. Tolerance was measured using a visual analogic scale (VAS). Fifteen patients were enrolled. After 24?h, patients showed a significant improvement in dyspnea score [Borg scale from 6.7?±?1.4 to 4.1?±?1.3 (p<.001)]; RR decreased from 29.6?±?2.7?breaths/min to 23.2?±?2.9?breaths/min (p<.001); pCO2 significantly decreased after 24?h [58.4?±?13 vs. 51.7?±?8.2 (p=.003)] while quantity of mucus production increased [(1.1?±?0,6 vs. 2.4?±?0.7, p<.001)]. No patient received invasive or noninvasive mechanical ventilation. Overall VAS score for HFNT tolerance was 6.5. HFNT was effective in improving dyspnea score, decreasing RR, improving gas exchange, and increasing mucus production in patients with AECOPD and coexisting bronchiectasis. Moreover, no safety concerns on its use were detected. Nevertheless, due to the single-arm design, the effect of HFNT could not be isolated from standard pharmacological treatment due to the study design.     

Efficacy of Alfacalcidol on PEG-IFN/ Ribavirin Combination Therapy for Elderly Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C: A Pilot Study

Background

Serum vitamin D concentration is reported to show a decrease in older age. Patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) in Japan are older on average than those in Western countries. Moreover, the outcome of pegylated-interferon (PEG-IFN)/ ribavirin therapy combined with vitamin D in elderly patients is unclear.

Objectives

This pilot study explored the efficacy and safety of alfacalcidol as vitamin D source in PEG-IFN/ ribavirin combination therapy for elderly CHC patients infected with hepatitis C virus genotype 1b.

Patients and Methods

Consecutive twenty CHC patients aged ≥ 65 years were enrolled in this pilot study. Fifteen patients met the inclusion criteria and received PEG-IFN/ ribavirin therapy combined with alfacalcidol. Four-week lead-in of oral alfacalcidol was conducted, and it was subsequently and concurrently administered in PEG-IFN/ ribavirin combination therapy (vitamin D group). Age, gender, and IL28B genotype-matched patients, who received PEG-IFN/ ribavirin alone, were saved as control group (n = 15) to compare the treatment outcome with the vitamin D group.

Results

Subjects consisted of 14 males and 16 females, with a median age of 70 years (65-78). The serum 25 (OH) D3 concentration in females (20 ng/ml, 11-37) was significantly lower than males (27 ng/mL, 13-49) (P = 0.004). Sustained virological response (SVR) rates were 33.3% (5/15) in the control group and 80.0% (12/15) in the vitamin D group, respectively (P = 0.025). While no significant difference was shown in the (SVR) rate between the two groups among males (P = 0.592), in females the SVR rate was significantly higher in the vitamin D group (87.5%, 7/8) than the control group (25.0%, 2/8) (P = 0.041). The relapse rates in the groups with and without alfacalcidol were 7.7% (1/13) and 61.5% (8/13), respectively (P = 0.011). Interestingly, in females, the relapse in the control group was shown in 5 of 7 (71.4%), whereas in the vitamin D group the relapse rate was decreased (1/8, 12.5%) (P = 0.041). No specific adverse events were observed in the vitamin D group.

Conclusions

PEG-IFN/ ribavirin combined with alfacalcidol may be effective and safe in elderly CHC patients. In particular, concomitant administration of alfacalcidol may lead to a reduced relapse rate, and consequently improving the SVR rate in elderly females.     

Response to Indacaterol/Glycopyrronium (IND/GLY) by Sex in Patients with COPD: A Pooled Analysis from the IGNITE Program

In this pooled analysis, we compared the effect of indacaterol/glycopyrronium (IND/GLY) by sex versus other commonly used chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treatments and placebo. Male and female patients with moderate-to-very-severe COPD who had participated in six randomized controlled trials were included in the analysis. Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were analyzed by sex, and any differences noted. The effects of IND/GLY versus salmeterol/fluticasone (SFC), glycopyrronium, tiotropium and placebo, on lung function and the patient-reported outcomes (health status, dyspnea, rescue medication use and symptoms) were assessed by sex after 26 weeks treatment. The analysis population comprised 4719 men and 1389 women. Most baseline parameters differed significantly between men and women. Nonetheless, despite these differences in baseline characteristics, IND/GLY significantly improved lung function versus placebo (p < 0.0001) and all active comparators (p < 0.01) in men and women. Overall, IND/GLY showed better improvement in dyspnea and health status compared with all other treatments in both sex. Greater reduction of rescue medication use was observed with IND/GLY versus placebo and other treatments (all p < 0.01 expect IND/GLY versus SFC). Although some variability was observed, improvements in health status, dyspnea, rescue medication use and symptoms were generally larger in women than in men. Irrespective of sex, IND/GLY provided superior efficacy to monotherapy or SFC in both men and women. Small differences in efficacy response by sex were observed, which should be evaluated further in prospective clinical studies. Nevertheless, the benefits observed with IND/GLY confirm dual bronchodilator as the preferred therapy in patients with moderate-to-very-severe COPD regardless of sex.     

Predictors of Mortality in Patients with COPD and Chronic Respiratory Failure: The Quality-of-Life Evaluation and Survival Study (QuESS): A Three-Year Study

Previous studies sought to identify survival or outcome predictors in patients with COPD and chronic respiratory failure, but their findings are inconsistent. We identified mortality-associated factors in a prospective study in 21 centers in 7 countries. Follow-up data were available in 221 patients on home mechanical ventilation and/or long-term oxygen therapy. Measurements: diagnosis, co-morbidities, medication, oxygen therapy, mechanical ventilation, pulmonary function, arterial blood gases, exercise performance were recorded. Health status was assessed using the COPD-specific SGRQ and the respiratory-failure-specific MRF26 questionnaires. Date and cause of death were recorded in those who died.

Overall mortality was 19.5%. The commonest causes of death were related to the underlying respiratory diseases. At baseline, patients who subsequently died were older than survivors (p = 0.03), had a lower forced vital capacity (p = 0.03), a higher use of oxygen at rest (p = 0.003) and a worse health status (SGRQ and MRF26, both p = 0.02). Longitudinal analyses over a follow-up period of 3 years showed higher median survival times in patients with use of oxygen at rest less than 1.75 l/min and with a better health status. In contrast, an increase from baseline levels of 1 liter in O₂ flow at rest, 1 unit in SGRQ or MRF26, or 1 year increase in age resulted in an increase of mortality of 68%, 2.4%, 1.3%, and 6%, respectively. In conclusion, the need for oxygen at rest, and health status assessment seems to be the strongest predictors of mortality in COPD patients with chronic respiratory failure.     

Efficacy and Safety of an Aclidinium Bromide Treatment for 12 Weeks or Longer in Patients with Moderate-To-Severe COPD: A Meta-Analysis

Background: Bronchodilators are commonly used to manage patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This meta-analysis assessed the efficacy of aclidinium bromide with respect to clinical events, health-related quality of life and symptom scales, pulmonary function, and safety among patients with stable COPD. Methods: A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library databases was undertaken to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared aclidinium with placebo, treatment over at least 12 weeks. Trials were measured using either odds ratios (OR) or mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Seven studies, containing 7001 patients, were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with placebo, aclidinium bromide reduced the incidence of exacerbation-related hospitalizations (OR 0.64; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.89) and improved quality of life as measured by a lower total George's Respiratory Questionnaire [SGRQ] score (MD ?2.34; 95% CI ?3.18 to ?1.51) and attenuated dyspnea symptom as assessed by changes in the Transitional Dyspnea Index [TDI] (MD 0.76; 95% CI 0.43 to 1.10). Similar changes were observed with regard to trough FEV₁ and FVC and peak FEV₁ and FVC. No significant differences were observed with regard to all-cause mortality, COPD exacerbations, non-fatal serious adverse events or cardiac adverse events. Conclusions: Aclidinium reduced the incidence of exacerbation-related hospitalizations and improved quality of life, COPD symptoms and pulmonary function. In addition, aclidinium did not increase the incidence of non-fatal serious adverse events, cardiac adverse events, or COPD exacerbations and was not associated with increased mortality.