Vascular Access in Hemodialysis Patients with Central Venous Obstruction or Stenosis: One Center’s Experience

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of complex hemodialysis access procedures among patients with central venous obstruction who were running out of access sites. Between September 2002 and December 2003 we performed a total of 640 new hemodialysis access procedures in 3 renal units. Ten of these patients presented central vein stenosis or obstruction and were not suitable for peritoneal dialysis. Each of the 10 patients had 3 or 4 previous failed access procedures and numerous infected central lines and their dialysis catheters were not functioning adequately. Nine patients presented with a severely stenosed or occluded superior vena cava and 1 had both subclavian veins occluded. Three patients were diabetics, 2 were obese and 6 had hypertension. We performed 12 procedures on these 10 patients. Saphenous veins were used 6 times, twice as a loop to the femoral artery and 4 times as a transposition to the popliteal artery above the knee. Femoral vein transposition to the popliteal artery was carried out in 2 cases. We performed 3 axillary artery to popliteal vein polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) bypasses, 1 on an obese woman who had no saphenous vein and was not suitable for a femoral vein transposition, 1 on a diabetic woman whose saphenous vein loop clotted after 5 months and 1 on a female patient with severe peripheral vascular disease. The patient with bilateral subclavian vein occlusion had a brachial artery to internal jugular vein PTFE graft. The PTFE graft to the jugular vein has been patent and regularly needled with a follow-up of 4 months. Four saphenous vein fistulae were regularly used for dialysis; 2 were never used. Five saphenous fistulae clotted after an average life span of 4 months (range 3 weeks-9 months) and 1 is still patent and in use (5 months). Both femoral vein transpositions have been patent and have been needled 3 times a week with a follow-up of 10 and 4 months; one had to be revised surgically after 9 months. Of the 3 axillary artery to popliteal vein grafts, 1 had to be tied off after a week because of severe steal syndrome and 2 have been patent (20 months follow-up) and have been needled regularly ever since. Seventy percent of these patients have been dialyzed line-free through their fistula despite severe central vein stenosis or obstruction for periods of 9-18 months when this review was undertaken. Although the follow-up needs to be longer, we discuss the surgical, radiologic, and dialysis features of these patients and propose a management pathway for central vein stenosis or occlusion.     

Inadequate Margins of Excision When Undergoing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer: Which Patients are at Risk?

Background

We analyzed the margin status and risk factors for inadequate margins among patients who underwent skin-sparing mastectomies (SSM) and traditional total mastectomies (TM).

Materials and Methods

Patients undergoing mastectomies from 2003 to 2009 were included. Margins of excision were considered positive if carcinoma was at an inked margin and were considered close if such disease was within 2 mm of an inked margin.

Results

A total of 426 patients were identified. The mean age was 60 years and 90% were white. Mean tumor size was 2.6 cm and 44% had multiple ipsilateral carcinomas. Of 426 patients, 177 (42%) underwent SSM with reconstruction and 249 (58%) TM. The rate of positive or close margins on the initial specimen was 29% for SSM vs. 12% for TM (P < 0.01), and the rate of reoperation for margins was 7% for SSM vs. 2% for TM (P < 0.01). Logistic regression analysis revealed that independent risk factors for initial close or positive margins included SSM (odds ratio 2.36, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.05–5.30), multiple ipsilateral tumors (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.05–4.24), and upper-inner quadrant location (OR 2.58, 95% CI 1.07–6.19). Mean follow-up time was 28 months, and the local recurrence rate was 0.9%. Local recurrence rates were not different for those undergoing SSM (1.1%) vs. TM (0.8%, P = NS).

Conclusions

Mastectomy patients undergoing SSM, with multiple ipsilateral tumors, and/or upper-inner quadrant disease are at significantly higher risk for inadequate margins of excision. These patients warrant more vigilant intraoperative attention to margin status to ensure adequate margins at the end of the first operation.     

Mortality in Older Patients with Breast Cancer Undergoing Breast Surgery: How Low is “Low Risk”?

Background

Breast surgery carries a low risk of postoperative mortality. For older patients with multiple comorbidities, even low-risk procedures can confer some increased perioperative risk. We sought to identify factors associated with postoperative mortality in breast cancer patients ≥70 years to create a nomogram for predicting risk of death within 90 days.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic invasive breast cancer (2010–2016) were selected from the National Cancer Database. Unadjusted OS was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate the association of age and surgery with 90-day mortality and to build a predictive nomogram.

Results

Among surgical patients ≥70 years, unadjusted 90-day mortality increased with increasing age (70–74 = 0.4% vs. ≥85 = 1.6%), comorbidity score (0 = 0.5% vs. ≥3 = 2.7%), and disease stage (I = 0.4% vs. III = 2.7%; all p < 0.001). After adjustment, death within 90 days of surgery was associated with higher age (≥85 vs. 70–74: odds ratio [OR] 3.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.74–3.65), comorbidity score (≥3 vs. 0: OR 4.79, 95% CI 3.89–5.89), and disease stage (III vs. I: OR 4.30, 95% CI 3.69–5.00). Based on these findings, seven variables (age, gender, comorbidity score, facility type, facility location, clinical stage, and surgery type) were selected to build a nomogram; estimates of risk of death within 90 days ranged from <1 to >30%.

Conclusions

Breast operations remain relatively low-risk procedures for older patients with breast cancer, but select factors can be used to estimate the risk of postoperative mortality to guide surgical decision-making among older women.

     

Which Is a Better Position for Insertion of a High Thoracic Epidural Catheter: Sitting or Lateral Decubitus?

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and success rates associated with the placement of a high thoracic epidural catheter in the sitting vs. the lateral decubitus position. DESIGN: Prospective randomized study. SETTING: University hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-one patients scheduled for off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery (OPCAB) by means of high thoracic epidural anesthesia at Th 1/2. INTERVENTIONS: The epidural catheter was placed into the patients in the sitting or lateral decubitus position. The success rates, the time for catheter insertion, the incidence of adverse events, and the accuracy of the catheterization in both groups were compared. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The success rates in both groups were comparable, whereas 20% of patients showed a vagal reflex during epidural catheterization in the sitting group (p < 0.05). The insertion time in the sitting group was significantly shorter than in the lateral decubitus group (p < 0.05). Accuracy at the first attempt to the Th1/2 epidural space was 93% in the sitting group and 73% in the lateral decubitus group, but there was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.186). CONCLUSIONS: It is recommended to use the lateral decubitus position for high thoracic epidural catheterization in patients scheduled for OPCAB to avoid vagal reflexes.     

Which Bone-Modifying Agent is Associated with Better Outcomes in Patients with Skeletal Metastases from Lung Cancer? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

BackgroundLung cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers and is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Metastatic bone disease occurs in 20% to 40% of patients with lung cancer, and these patients often present with pain or skeletal-related events (SREs) that are associated with decreased survival. Bone-modifying agents such as denosumab or bisphosphonates are routinely used; however, to our knowledge, there has been no quantitative synthesis of randomized controlled trial data to determine the most effective pharmacologic treatment of metastatic bone disease because of lung cancer.Questions/purposesWe aimed to perform a network meta-analysis of randomized trials to identify the bone-modifying agent that is associated with the (1) highest overall survival, (2) longest time to SRE, (3) lowest SRE incidence, and (4) greatest likelihood of pain resolution.MethodsWe conducted our study according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol and pre-registered the analysis on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42019124364). We performed a librarian-assisted search of MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Chinese databases including China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang Data. We included randomized controlled trials reporting outcomes specifically for patients with lung cancer treated with a bisphosphonate or denosumab. SREs included pathologic fractures, spinal cord compression, hypercalcemia of malignancy, or pain resulting in surgical intervention or radiation therapy. We excluded trials exclusively reporting surrogate outcomes such as changes in bone turnover markers. Screening, data extraction, risk of bias evaluation, and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation evaluations were performed in duplicate. We included 131 randomized controlled trials that evaluated 11,105 patients with skeletal metastases from lung cancer. The network meta-analysis was performed using a frequentist model and the R statistical software. Results are reported as relative risks or mean differences, and the I² value is reported for heterogeneity. The P-score, a measure of ranking certainty that accounts for standard error, is reported for each outcome. Heterogeneity in the network was considered moderate for overall survival and time to SRE, mild for the incidence of SRE, and low for pain resolution.ResultsFor overall survival, denosumab was ranked above zoledronic acid and estimated to confer a mean of 3.3 months (95% CI 0.3-6.3) of increased overall survival compared with untreated patients (P-score = 89%). For the time to SRE, denosumab was ranked first with a mean of 9.1 additional SRE-free months (95% CI 6.7-11.5) compared with untreated patients (P-score = 99%), while zoledronic acid conferred an additional 4.8 SRE-free months (95% CI 3.6-6.1). Reduction in the incidence of SREs was not different between patients treated with denosumab (relative risk 0.54; 95% CI 0.33-0.87) and those treated with zoledronic acid (relative risk 0.56; 95% CI 0.46-0.67). Patients treated with the combination of ibandronate and systemic therapy were more likely to experience successful pain resolution than untreated patients (relative risk 2.4; 95% CI 1.8-3.2).ConclusionIn this comprehensive synthesis of all available randomized controlled trial evidence guiding the pharmacologic treatment of bone metastases from lung cancer, denosumab was ranked above zoledronic acid for overall survival and time to SRE and was not different for reducing the incidence of SRE. Both were superior to no treatment for each of these outcomes. Given this, we encourage physicians to consider the use of denosumab or zoledronic acid in treating this patient population. The combination of ibandronate and systemic therapy was the most effective at reducing pain because of metastases. No cost-effectiveness analysis has yet been performed for denosumab and zoledronic acid on patients with metastatic lung cancer, and this represents an avenue for future research.Level of EvidenceLevel I, therapeutic study.     

Sentinel Lymph Node Detection for Breast Cancer: Which Patients Are Best Suited for the Patent Blue Dye Only Method of Identification?

Background: The objectives of this study were, first, to define the preoperative criteria for using solely the blue dye method and, second, to decrease its operator dependence in predicting axillary lymph node status.Methods: Two hundred fifty-three women consecutively identified with operable breast cancer underwent sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection by the patent blue dye method followed by completion axillary lymph node dissection. A standard pathological examination was performed for all SLN. Then, a pathological color quality assessment (PCQA), which checked for the presence of the blue dye, was performed on the paraffin blocks of the nonmetastatic SLN. Six preoperative identifiable variables likely to influence the detection rate were examined.Results: The surgical detection (sd) rate was 84% (213 of 253) and the PCQA rate was 73% (185 of 253). Only breast size (sd, P = .0005; PCQA, P = .0007) and body mass index 30 (sd, P = .005; PCQA, P = .0007) were significant for SLN identification. Multivariate analysis revealed two independent factors influencing SLN identification: breast size (sd, P = .0001; PCQA, P = .002) and the timing of injection—injection prior to lumpectomy (sd, P =.04).Conclusions: The optimal patient features for identifying the SLN by the patent blue dye method are small or medium-sized breasts, low body fat, and that the procedure is carried out prior to tumor excision. The PCQA offers a useful second assessment of the surgically removed SLN, introducing an independent element of quality control.     

Which is the Optimal Response Criteria for Evaluating Preoperative Treatment in Esophageal Cancer: RECIST or Histology?

Background

Preoperative treatment is a promising strategy for improving long-term outcomes in advanced esophageal cancer. Two tumor response evaluation criteria for preoperative treatment are available: response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) and histological criteria. This prospective study aimed to identify which was a better surrogate end point for survival in the preoperative setting.

Methods

We analyzed all eligible patients (n = 164) from the preoperative treatment group in a phase III trial comparing preoperative versus postoperative 5-fluorouracil plus cisplatin for clinical stage II or III esophageal cancer. Intercriteria reliability was evaluated with the proportion of agreement and the kappa coefficient. For validity analyses, hazard ratios (HR) of response to nonresponse and differences in response rates between short- and long-term survivors were evaluated.

Results

The clinical and histological response rates were 37.8 % (62 of 164) and 20.1 % (33 of 164), respectively. The proportion of agreement for response to nonresponse between the 2 criteria was 70.3 %, and the kappa coefficient was 0.34. The HR for death in patients with histological response (0.22, 95 % confidence interval 0.09–0.55, P < 0.001) was lower than for those with RECIST response (0.55, 95 % confidence interval 0.33–0.91, P = 0.018). The difference in response rates between short- and long-term survivors according to histological criteria (27 vs. 7 %, P < 0.001) was larger than with RECIST (42 vs. 30 %, P = 0.13).

Conclusions

Intercriteria agreement was relatively low, and histological criteria yielded more valid assessments of response than RECIST. Histological response rate seemed to be the better surrogate end point of survival in the preoperative setting.     

Radiological Staging for Distant Metastases in Breast Cancer Patients with Confirmed Local and/or Locoregional Recurrence: How Useful are Current Guideline Recommendations?

Annals of Surgical Oncology - Breast cancer patients with local and/or locoregional recurrence (LR) are at higher risk of developing distant metastases (DM) at a later time. Once LR has been...     

Should Ductal Carcinoma-in-situ (DCIS) Be Removed from the ASTRO Consensus Panel Cautionary Group for Off-protocol Use of Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI)? A Pooled Analysis of Outcomes for 300 Patients with DCIS Treated with APBI

Purpose

To analyze outcomes in patients with ductal carcinoma-in-situ (DCIS) treated with accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) within a pooled set of patients.

Methods

A total of 300 women with DCIS underwent APBI between April 1993 and November 2010 as part of American Society of Breast Surgeons MammoSite Registry Trial (n = 192) or at William Beaumont Hospital (n = 108). Patients with pure DCIS <3 cm (n = 125) were assigned to the cautionary risk group per American Society of Radiation Oncology consensus panel guidelines for off-protocol use of APBI and analyzed compared to a pooled invasive suitable (n = 653) risk group and pooled invasive suitable/cautionary (n = 1,298) risk group.

Results

The rate of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) for all 300 DCIS patients was 2.6 % at 5 years with no regional recurrences, while cause-specific survival was 99.5 % and overall survival (OS) was 96.4 %. When comparing the cautionary DCIS group to the invasive suitable/cautionary group, no difference in IBTR was noted (2.6 vs. 3.1 %, P = 0.90) with significant improvements in distant metastases (0 vs. 2.5 %, P = 0.05), disease-free survival (98.5 vs. 94.4 %, P = 0.05), and OS (95.7 vs. 90.8 %, P = 0.03) noted for DCIS patients. When comparing cautionary DCIS patients to invasive suitable patients, no difference in IBTR were noted (2.6 vs. 2.4 %, P = 0.76), while improved OS for DCIS patients was noted (95.7 vs. 90.9 %, P = 0.02).

Conclusions

This analysis of the largest cohort of patients with DCIS treated with APBI supports previously reported excellent outcomes; as a result of small numbers of events, further data are necessary to confirm these findings.     

Lethal area 50 percent (LA50) or standardized mortality ratio (SMR): Which one is more conclusive?

Background

Burn injuries impose a considerable burden on healthcare systems. It is among the top ten causes of mortality and a major cause of disability. This study aimed to calculate and compare the lethal area fifty percent (LA50) and standardized mortality ratio (SMR) in patients with burns.

More is More? Total Pancreatectomy for Periampullary Cancer as an Alternative in Patients with High-Risk Pancreatic Anastomosis: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Annals of Surgical Oncology -