The Care of Adult Patients in Pediatric Emergency Departments

ObjectiveAdult patients are increasingly receiving care in pediatric emergency departments (PEDs), but little is known about the epidemiology of these visits. The goals of this study were to examine the characteristics of adult patients (≥21 years) treated in PEDs and to describe the variation in resource utilization across centers.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study examining visits to 30 PEDs (2012–2016) using the Pediatric Health Information System. Visits were categorized using All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Groups and compared between age cohorts. We used multivariable logistic models to examine variation in demographics, utilization, testing, treatment, and disposition.ResultsThere were 12,958,626 visits to the 30 PEDs over 5 years; 70,636 (0.6%) were by adults. Compared with children, adult patients had more laboratory testing (49% vs 34%), diagnostic imaging (32% vs 29%), and procedures (48% vs 31%), and they were more often admitted (17% vs 11%) or transferred (21% vs 0.7%) (P < .001 for all). In multivariable analysis, older age, black race, Hispanic ethnicity, and private insurance were associated with decreased odds of admission in adults seen in PEDs. Across PEDs, the admission rates (7%–25%) and transfer rates (6%–46%) for adults varied.ConclusionsAdult patients cared for at PEDs have higher rates of testing, diagnostic imaging, procedures, and admission or transfer. There is wide variation in the care of adults in PEDs, highlighting the importance of further work to identify the optimal approach to adults who present for care in pediatric centers.     

Differences in Frequency of Visits to Pediatric Primary Care Practices and Emergency Departments by Body Mass Index

ObjectivesTo examine differences in utilization across health care settings among children by body mass index (BMI) categories to help identify opportunities for interventions.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted using 1 year of electronic health records following an index primary care visit for children 3 to 17 years old in 2016. Index visits occurred at >40 pediatric practices affiliated with a Northeastern health system. Using normal BMI as a reference group, we examined the extent to which children's BMI percentile categories were associated with primary care visits, emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, and ED visit acuity. Age, sex, race/ethnicity, and insurance status were used as covariates.ResultsOf those with biologically plausible values for height and weight (n = 30,352), the prevalences of overweight, obesity, and severe obesity were 16.3%, 12.4%, and 5.7%, respectively. Children outside of the normal BMI range made more primary care visits; however, relative patterns of ED utilization were not consistent. Children with obesity versus normal BMI were less likely to have ED visits of high acuity. Risk of hospitalization was higher among children with overweight or severe obesity.ConclusionsChildren's BMI categories were associated with health care utilization, specifically primary care visits, ED visits, and hospitalizations. Further investigation is needed to explore the drivers of these differences in utilization, such as the impact of stigma and perceived weight bias on care-seeking patterns, and to examine the role of settings outside of primary care in pediatric weight management.     

Provider-Level and Hospital-Level Factors and Process Measures of Quality Care Delivered in Pediatric Emergency Departments

ObjectiveDifferences in the quality of emergency department (ED) care are often attributed to nonclinical factors such as variations in the structure, systems, and processes of care. Few studies have examined these associations among children. We aimed to determine whether process measures of quality of care delivered to patients receiving care in children's hospital EDs were associated with physician-level or hospital-level factors.MethodsWe included children (<18 years old) who presented to any of the 12 EDs participating in the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) between January 2011 and December 2011. We measured quality of care from medical record reviews using a previously validated implicit review instrument with a summary score ranging from 5 to 35, and examined associations between process measures of quality and physician- and hospital-level factors using a mixed-effects linear regression model adjusted for patient case-mix, with hospital site as a random effect.ResultsAmong the 620 ED encounters reviewed, we did not find process measures of quality to be associated with any physician-level factors such as physician sex, years since medical school graduation, or physician training. We found, however, that process measures of quality were positively associated with delivery at freestanding children's hospitals (1.96 points higher in quality compared to nonfreestanding status, 95% confidence interval: 0.49, 3.43) and negatively associated with higher annual ED patient volume (−0.03 points per thousand patients, 95% confidence interval: −0.05, −0.01).ConclusionProcess measures of quality of care delivered to children were higher among patients treated at freestanding children's hospitals but lower among patients treated at higher volume EDs.     

Pediatric Agitation in the Emergency Department: A Survey of Pediatric Emergency Care Coordinators

ObjectiveAcute agitation episodes in the emergency department (ED) can be distressing for patients, families, and staff and may lead to injuries. We aim to understand availability of ED resources to care for children with acute agitation, perceived staff confidence with agitation management, barriers to use of de-escalation techniques, and desired resources to enhance care.MethodsWe conducted a survey of pediatric emergency care coordinators (PECCs) in EDs in Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Los Angeles County, California.ResultsPECCs from 63 of 102 (61.8%) EDs responded. PECCs reported that ED staff feel least confident managing agitation due to developmental delay (DD) or autism spectrum disorder (ASD) (52.4%). Few EDs had a separate space to care for children with mental health conditions (22.5%), a standardized agitation scale (9.6%), an agitation management guideline (12.9%), or agitation management training (24.2%). Modification of the environment was not perceived possible for 42% of EDs. Participants reported that a barrier to the use of the de-escalation techniques distraction and verbal de-escalation was perceived lack of effectiveness (22.6% and 22.6%, respectively). Desired resources to manage agitation included guidelines for medications (82.5%) and sample care pathways (57.1%).ConclusionsED PECCs report low confidence in managing agitation due to DD or ASD and limited pediatric resources to address acute agitation. Additional pediatric-specific resources and training, especially for children with DD or ASD, are needed to increase clinician confidence in agitation management and to promote high-quality, patient-centered care. Training programs can focus on the early identification of agitation and the effective use of non-invasive de-escalation strategies.     

Social Emergency Medicine: Capitalizing on the Pediatric Emergency Department Visit to Screen and Connect Patients and Families to Community Resources

ObjectiveTo describe the social needs of families screened by the Community Health Advocates Team (CHAT) Desk, situated within a pediatric emergency department (PED); and to evaluate the effectiveness of this help desk in connecting families to community resources.MethodsTrained undergraduates, onsite in the PED 30 hours/week during daytime and evening hours, weekdays and weekends, screened a convenience sample of families of patients in the PED for social needs, and provided information on available community resources. Families were offered a follow-up phone call several weeks after their PED visit to assess program satisfaction and success, and identify remaining social needs.ResultsBetween January 2019 and March 2020, CHAT Desk screened and assisted 682 families. CHAT routinely provided resources about free outdoor recreational activities for families, but after that, the most commonly provided informational resources pertained to: health care (n = 200), housing (n = 143), and food (n = 137). Of families who completed the follow-up phone call (n = 294), almost half (n = 134, 46%) reported being able to contact at least one of the resources; 100 reported that the resource was able to assist them, and 99 families planned to continue using the resource. When asked about satisfaction, 93% (n = 274) reported being very satisfied or somewhat satisfied with CHAT; 94% (n = 276) said they would recommend it to others.ConclusionsThe PED of a busy tertiary care children's hospital is an opportune location to screen families for social needs, and provide them with information on requested community resources.     

Telehealth as a Tool for Quality Improvement in the Care of Pediatric Patients in Community Emergency Departments

Nearly 90% of pediatric emergency care is provided in a general emergency department (ED) that serve both adults and children. Many children in the United States do not live near an ED with a high level of pediatric readiness and many children are transferred to dedicated pediatric centers. Telemedicine provides an opportunity to impact care delivery systems to allow for children to be treated closer to home while maintaining high quality care. In this article, we will explore opportunities to use telemedicine in the emergency department and discuss incorporating quality improvement methodology to increase utilization of telehealth services.     

National Pediatric Readiness Project: Making a Difference Through Collaboration,Simulation, and Measurement of the Quality of Pediatric Emergency Care

The National Pediatric Readiness Project is a national quality initiative sponsored by the American College of Emergency Physicians, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the Emergency Nurses Association. Multiple efforts across numerous states are in process to optimize pediatric readiness of emergency departments. This article describes past, current, and future efforts to ensure pediatric readiness of our nations' emergency departments and to understand the relationship between pediatric readiness and quality of pediatric emergency care.