Detection of methicillin/oxacillin resistance and typing in aminoglycoside-susceptible methicillin-resistant and kanamycin-tobramycin-resistant methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus

Eighty-five atypical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus divided into 73 aminoglycoside-susceptible methicillinresistant (AS-MRSA) and 12 kanamycin-tobramycin-resistant methicillin-susceptible (KTR-MSSA) were phenotypically and genotypically examined for methicillin resistance. Among these tests, the diffusion method using the oxacillin and cefoxitin disks on Mueller-Hinton agar with and without NaCl, the incubation at 35 degrees C or 30 degrees C for 24 or 48 hr, respectively, and the determination of oxacillin MICs by E-test were performed. We also examined the presence of the mecA gene by PCR and its product PBP 2a by the Slidex MRSA Detection test after induction by cefoxitin disk. All of the AS-MRSA strains (100%) were detected by the cefoxitin disk in all conditions and by the oxacillin disk on Mueller-Hinton agar with 2% of NaCl at 35 degrees C. Without NaCl, the sensitivity fell to 97.2% by oxacillin disk. The oxacillin MICs for these isolates ranged from 2 to 128 mg/L. The mecA gene determinant and its product PBP 2a were detected in all AS-MRSA strains. All KTR-MSSA strains were phenotypically methicillin-susceptible and oxacillin MICs were below or borderline of breakpoint (< or =2 mg/L). The mecA gene determinant and its product were detected in one strain. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was applied and revealed the presence of two major patterns A (36.9%) and B (46.2%) in AS-MRSA isolates and seven patterns in the KTR-MSSA strains.     

Disk with High Oxacillin Content Discriminates between Methicillin-Resistant and Borderline Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Strains in Disk Diffusion Assays Using a Low Salt Concentration

A separation between mecA+ strains of Staphylococcus aureus and strains lacking mecA was achieved by the disk diffusion assay and the agar dilution method, utilizing disks containing 5 microg of oxacillin and inocula of approximately 5 x 10(5) CFU/spot, respectively, provided that agar with 0 to 0.5% NaCl and incubation at 30 degrees C were employed. The 5-microg oxacillin disks clearly discriminated between borderline methicillin-susceptible and mecA+ strains. The oxacillin MICs were more affected by the inoculum density and salt concentration than were the methicillin MICs, and oxacillin MICs of 4 to 16 microg/ml were obtained for strains lacking mecA. Significantly higher levels of beta-lactamase production and reduced oxacillin susceptibilities were recorded for strains lacking mecA, in particular strains of phage group V, when agar with >/=2% NaCl was used than when agar with 0 to 0.5% NaCl was employed. The results indicate that the borderline methicillin-susceptible phenotype is a salt-dependent in vitro phenomenon of questionable clinical relevance.     

Evaluation of three rapid methods for detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus

The probe-based Velogene Rapid MRSA Identification Assay (ID Biomedical Corp., Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada) and the latex agglutination MRSA-Screen (Denka Seiken Co., Tokyo, Japan) were evaluated for their ability to identify methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and to distinguish strains of MRSA from borderline oxacillin-resistant S. aureus (BORSA; mecA-negative, oxacillin MICs of 2 to 8 microgram/ml). The Velogene is a 90-min assay using a chimeric probe to detect the mecA gene. MRSA-Screen is a 15-min latex agglutination test with penicillin-binding protein 2a antibody-sensitized latex particles. We compared these assays with the BBL Crystal MRSA ID System (Becton Dickinson, Cockeysville, Md.) and with PCR for mecA gene detection. A total of 397 clinical isolates of S. aureus were tested, consisting of 164 methicillin-susceptible strains, 197 MRSA strains, and 37 BORSA strains. All assays performed well for the identification of MRSA with sensitivities and specificities for Velogene, MRSA-Screen, and BBL Crystal MRSA ID of 98.5 and 100%, 98.5 and 100%, and 98.5 and 98%, respectively. Three MRSA strains were not correctly identified by each of the Velogene and MRSA-Screen assays, but repeat testing with a larger inoculum resolved the discrepancies. The BBL Crystal MRSA ID test misclassified four BORSA strains as MRSA. Both the Velogene and the MRSA-Screen assays are easy to perform, can accurately differentiate BORSA isolates from MRSA isolates, and provide a rapid alternative for the detection of methicillin resistance in S. aureus in clinical laboratories, especially when mecA PCR gene detection is unavailable.     

Rapid Slide Latex Agglutination Test for Detection of Methicillin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus

The MRSA screen test (Denka Seiken Co., Ltd.), a commercially available, rapid (20-min) slide latex agglutination test for the determination of methicillin resistance by detection of PBP 2a in Staphylococcus aureus, was compared with the oxacillin agar screen test and PCR detection of the mecA gene. A total of 563 S. aureus isolates were tested. Two hundred ninety-six of the isolates were methicillin-susceptible isolates from cultures of blood from consecutive patients. Also, 267 methicillin-resistant isolates that comprised 248 different phage types were tested. Methicillin resistance was defined as the presence of the mecA gene. Of the 267 mecA gene-positive isolates, 263 were positive by the MRSA screen test (sensitivity, 98.5%), and all the mecA-gene negative strains were negative by the MRSA screen test (specificity, 100%). The oxacillin agar screen test detected methicillin resistance in 250 of the mecA gene-positive isolates (sensitivity, 93.6%). The sensitivity of the MRSA screen test was statistically significantly higher than the sensitivity of the oxacillin agar screen test (P < 0. 05). The MRSA screen test is a highly sensitive and specific test for the detection of methicillin resistance. Also, it offers results within half an hour and is easy to perform, which makes this test a valuable tool in the ongoing battle against methicillin-resistant S. aureus.     

Validation of multiplex PCR strategy for simultaneous detection and identification of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) strategy is described for rapid identification of clinically relevant methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) that targets mecA and coagulase genes. In this study, 150 staphylococcal clinical isolates were used that included 40 isolates of MRSA, 55 isolates of methicillin susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), 44 isolates of methicillin susceptible coagulase negative Staphylococcus spp. (MS-CoNS) and 11 isolates of methicillin resistant coagulase negative Staphylococcus spp. (MR-CoNS). Out of 55 S. aureus strains, three strains demonstrated mecA gene, which appeared to be oxacillin sensitive by disc diffusion. When (MS-CoNS) were evaluated, 10 isolates classified as oxacillin sensitive phenotypically, yielded positive results in PCR method. The results for mecA detection by PCR were more consistent with disk susceptibility tests in case of MRSA (100%) and MSSA (95%) isolates. In contrast to above results with MRSA and MSSA, mecA detection by PCR in MS-CoNS showed less correlation with disk susceptibility tests (77%). The results for coag detection by PCR were consistent with phenotypic tests in all isolates.     

Comparison of phenotypic methods with PCR to screening methicillin resistance in coagulase negative staphylococci

THE AIM OF STUDY: Appreciation of the frequency, the level and the genetic support of methicillin resistance. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy-three strains of coagulase negative staphylococci isolated from various specimens, from January to June 2004, were studied. The phenotypic detection was carried out by disk diffusion test using oxacillin and cefoxitin disks, by the determination of oxacillin Minimal Inhibitor Concentration (E-test), by the oxacillin screening test at a concentration of 4 mug/ml and by the search of the penicillin binding protein PBP2a using the slide latex agglutination test. The results of these methods were compared to PCR of mecA gene. RESULTS: Forty-eight strains carried mecA gene whose 30 were detected by the oxacillin disk, the cefoxitin disk, the oxacillin screening test, the slide latex agglutination test and had a MIC from 24 to 256 mug/ml. Seventeen strains were not detected by oxacillin disk but by cefoxitin disk and the slide latex agglutination test. Among these strains, 13 (76%) had oxacillin MIC from 0.5 to 1,5 mug/ml and not grew on oxacillin agar screening, while 4 (24%) had oxacillin MIC from 6 to 16 mug/ml and grew on this agar. One strain had oxacillin MIC of 0,19 mug/ml and was not detected with any phenotypic method. CONCLUSION: The determination of oxacillin MIC, the search of the PBP2a or more simply the cefoxitin disk had permitted to detect the strains mecA gene (+) with resistant and pre-resistant phenotype but not the strain with sensible phenotype (2.1%).     

Evaluation of new Vitek 2 card and disk diffusion method for determining susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus to oxacillin

Detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus is a challenge, especially low-level resistance, which is often misdiagnosed. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracies of the automated Vitek 2 system and disk diffusion tests, using cefoxitin and moxalactam, for the detection of methicillin resistance in S. aureus strains. Four sets of genotypically diverse isolates were selected from a national reference collection, including mecA-negative S. aureus isolates (n = 56), hospital-acquired (n = 88) and community-acquired (n = 40) S. aureus isolates, and heterogeneous methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates (n = 29). Oxacillin susceptibility was tested by the Vitek 2 system with the AST P549 card and by disk diffusion methods using 10, 30, and 60 microg cefoxitin and 30 microg moxalactam. Oxacillin resistance was confirmed by PCR for the mecA gene. The overall sensitivities for oxacillin resistance detection were 97.5% for the Vitek 2 automated system, 98.7% for 60-microg cefoxitin and moxalactam disk diffusion, and 99.6% for 10- and 30-microg cefoxitin disks, respectively. Methicillin-susceptible S. aureus isolates were correctly reported as susceptible by all methods. The median times for methicillin testing were 7 h for the Vitek 2 system versus 24 h for disk diffusion methods. In conclusion, the cefoxitin and moxalactam disk diffusion methods and the Vitek 2 automated system are highly accurate methods for methicillin resistance detection, including a range of representative Belgian methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains and unusual strains exhibiting cryptic or low-level oxacillin resistance.     

Detection of low-level oxacillin resistance in mecA-positive Staphylococcus aureus

Detection of low-level oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is a problem that needs special attention, particularly in relation to methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains in the community that belong to clonal lineage ST80. This study compared different phenotypic methods for the detection of 74 low-level oxacillin-resistant S. aureus strains (oxacillin MIC or=2 mg/L) and 117 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus strains. Determination of microbroth dilution MICs for oxacillin was wholly unsatisfactory, and gave a limited specificity for cefoxitin. The sensitivity of disk-diffusion performed according to CLSI recommendations was 92% with an oxacillin 1-microg disk, and 96% with a cefoxitin 30-microg disk; use of a 10-microg cefoxitin disk and a semi-confluent inoculum (breakpoint for resistance <18 mm zone diameter) gave a sensitivity of 97%. When disk-diffusion was performed on IsoSensitest agar with a zone diameter breakpoint for resistance of <22 mm (as recommended by the Swedish Reference Group for Antibiotics), the sensitivity was 95%.     

Evaluation of three techniques for detection of low-level methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): a disk diffusion method with cefoxitin and moxalactam,the Vitek 2 system,and the MRSA-screen latex agglutination test

Very-low-level methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), or class 1 MRSA, is often misdiagnosed as methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA). We evaluated the performances of three methods for detection of low-level methicillin resistance: the disk diffusion method using the cephamycin antibiotics cefoxitin and moxalactam, the Vitek 2 system (bioMérieux), and the MRSA-screen test (Denka). Detection of the mecA gene by PCR was considered to be the "gold standard." We also determined the sensitivity of the oxacillin disk diffusion method with 5- and 1-microg disks and that of the Oxascreen agar assay with 6 mg of oxacillin liter(-1) for detection of MRSA. We compared the distributions of MICs of oxacillin and cefoxitin by the E-test (AB Biodisk), and those of moxalactam by dilutions in agar, for MRSA and MSSA isolates. The 152 clinical isolates of S. aureus studied were divided into 69 MSSA (mecA-negative) and 83 MRSA (mecA-positive) isolates, including 63 heterogeneous isolates and 26 class 1 isolates (low-level resistance). The cefoxitin and moxalactam disk diffusion tests detected 100% of all the MRSA classes: cefoxitin inhibition zone diameters were <27 mm, and moxalactam inhibition zone diameters were <24 mm. The Vitek 2 system and the MRSA-screen test detected 94 and 97.6% of all MRSA isolates, respectively. The sensitivities of the 5- and 1-microg oxacillin disks were 95.2 and 96.4%, respectively, whereas that of the Oxascreen agar screen assay was 94%. All of the tests except the 1-microg oxacillin disk test were 100% specific. For the class 1 MRSA isolates, the sensitivity of the Vitek 2 test was 92.3%, whereas those of the MRSA-screen test and the disk diffusion method with cefoxitin and moxalactam were 100%. Therefore, the cefoxitin and moxalactam disk diffusion methods were the best-performing tests for routine detection of all classes of MRSA.     

Evaluation of MRSA-Screen, a simple anti-PBP 2a slide latex agglutination kit, for rapid detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus

The MRSA-Screen test (Denka Seiken Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), consisting of a slide latex agglutination kit that detects PBP 2a with a monoclonal antibody, was blindly compared to the oxacillin disk diffusion test, the oxacillin-salt agar screen, and PCR of the mecA gene for the detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. A total of 120 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and 80 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolates, defined by the absence or presence of the mecA gene, respectively, were tested. The MRSA-Screen test, the oxacillin disk diffusion test, and the oxacillin-salt agar screening test showed sensitivities of 100, 61.3, and 82.5% and specificities of 99.2, 96.7, and 98.3%, respectively. We conclude that the MRSA-Screen is a very accurate, reliable, and fast test (15 min) for differentiation of MRSA from MSSA colonies on agar plates.     

Evaluation of different disk diffusion/media combinations for detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci

In order to find a disk diffusion method with both high sensitivity and specificity for determination of methicillin resistance primarily for S. aureus but also for coagulase-negative staphylococci we screened several methodological variants using a material of 66 S. aureus comprising of 11 methicillin-susceptible, 18 borderline-resistant, and 37 methicillin-resistant strains. Only four of the combinations studied performed with both high sensitivity and specificity. Two of these, the Columbia agar +4.5% NaCl and Mueller Hinton agar +2% NaCl combined with a 5 microg oxacillin disk, confluent inoculum and 24 h incubation at 35 degrees C were further evaluated using 105 MRSA and 91 mecA-negative S. aureus and 193 clinical isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci. The Columbia agar +4.5% NaCl performed excellently for both S. aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci. For Columbia agar +4.5% NaCl using a 5 microg oxacillin disk we suggest an interpretive zone diameter of R < or =15 mm and S > or =16 mm for S. aureus and R < or =24 mm and S >or =26 mm for coagulase-negative staphylococci. The Mueller Hinton agar +2% NaCl performed well for coagulase-negative staphylococci but for S. aureus at least three (3%) very major errors were found, making this method less attractive.     

Validation of rapid screening tests for the identification of methicillin resistance in staphylococci

The Velogene Rapid MRSA Identification Assay (Alexon-Trend Inc., Ramsey, MN), a commercially available 90-min genotypic test using a chimeric probe for the cycling-mediated recognition of the mecA gene in staphylococci, was compared with the MRSA-Screen latex agglutination test, a 15-min phenotypic test (Denka Seiken Co., Tokyo, Japan) for the identification of the mecA gene product PBP 2a. The results of both techniques were compared with mecA gene PCR. A total of 210 stock-culture strains were tested, consisting of 108 methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) strains and 92 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains. The performance of the assays was good, displaying sensitivities and specificities for Velogene and MRSA Screen of 96.7% and 100% and 96.7% and 100%, respectively. Both Velogene and MRSA Screen could not correctly identify three of the MRSA strains each. Repeat testing with a larger inoculum or exposure of the three distinct strains to methicillin, respectively, resolved these problems. All MSSA strains as well as the other genera were correctly addressed by both techniques. The 10 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis strains were detected by both techniques. Both the Velogene and the MRSA Screen assays accurately identified mecA-positive staphylococcal strains and can be successfully used for routine application in clinical microbiology laboratories.     

Comparison of different techniques for the detection of heterogeneous resistance to methicillin in Staphylococcus aureus]

The methods for detection of methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA) can fail to detect resistance because phenotypic expression is often heterogeneous (40% of strains). Seventy four strains of S. aureus [4 methicillin susceptible strains, 10 homogeneous MRSA (Ro) and 60 heterogeneous MRSA (Rh)] were isolated from different french hospitals in Paris. These strains were tested by different methods: oxacillin screen plate with 6 micrograms/ml oxacillin and 4% NaCl, agar diffusion method with 5 micrograms oxacillin disk tested either at 30 degrees C on Mueller-Hinton medium or at 37 degrees C on Mueller-Hinton plus 5% NaCl, BBL Crystal MRSA ID system tested with two inocula (0.5 and 1 McFarland equivalent bacterial suspension) at 37 degrees C for 4 h and 5 h. Dot-blot hybridization was performed under stringent condition with the mecA probe. The accuracy of the different methods for the detection of methicillin resistance is equivalent, except for the BBL crystal system with a 0.5 McFarland inoculum wich detects the resistance with an accuracy of 86% for Ro strains and 69% for Rh strains. In other respects, there was a close correlation with the detection of the phenotypic resistance and the presence of mecA gene. So this study demonstrates that these various methods can be used for the detection of methicillin resistant S. aureus. For a rapid detection (below 5 h) the BBL crystal system with a 1 McFarland inoculum can be used; the agar diffusion method remains a good method provided some conditions (inoculum, incubation temperature, addition of salt, incubation period); the oxicillin screnn plate is a very attractive method for it is easy and reliable.     

In vitro activity of dicloxacillin against methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus-aureus

A total of 54 strains of Staphylococcus aureus, 37 methicillin-susceptible (MSSA) and 17 methicillin-resistant (MRSA), were investigated for their susceptibility to dicloxacillin as compared to methicillin and oxacillin by agar plate dilution at two different temperatures of incubation (30 degrees C and 37 degrees C). Against MSSA strains we found a slight but significant increase (0-2 dilution steps) in minimal inhibitor concentrations (MICs) for all three antibiotics with decrease in incubation temperature. Against MRSA strains methicillin and oxacillin showed a 3-6 fold increase in median MIC with decrease incubation temperature. For dicloxacillin, in contrast, there were no significant differences in median MICs (i.e. 0.4 mg/l) against MSSA strains at 30 degrees C or MRSA strains at either incubation temperature. Population-analysis of the MRSA strains revealed, however, that a highly dicloxacillin-resistant subpopulation appeared with a frequency of 10(-6) to 10(-7). Such heterogenous resistance of MRSA strains to dicloxacillin probably prohibits the use of dicloxacillin against serious infections caused by these pathogens.     

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Comparison of Susceptibility Testing Methods and Analysis of mecA-Positive Susceptible Strains

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is responsible for an increasing number of serious nosocomial and community-acquired infections. Phenotypic heterogeneous drug resistance (heteroresistance) to antistaphylococcal beta-lactams affects the results of susceptibility testing. The present study compared the MRSA-Screen latex agglutination test (Denka Seiken Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) for detection of PBP 2a with agar dilution, the VITEK-1 and VITEK-2 systems (bioMérieux, St. Louis, Mo.), and the oxacillin agar screen test for detection of MRSA, with PCR for the mecA gene used as the "gold standard" assay. Analysis of 107 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) isolates and 203 MRSA isolates revealed that the MRSA-Screen latex agglutination test is superior to any single phenotype-based susceptibility testing method, with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 99.1%. Only one isolate that lacked mecA was weakly positive by the MRSA-Screen latex agglutination test. This isolate was phenotypically susceptible to oxacillin and did not contain the mecA gene by Southern blot hybridization. The oxacillin agar screen test, the VITEK-1 system, the VITEK-2 system, and agar dilution showed sensitivities of 99.0, 99.0, 99.5, and 99%, respectively, and specificities of 98.1, 100, 97.2, and 100%, respectively. The differences in sensitivity or specificity were not statistically significant. Oxacillin bactericidal assays showed that mecA- and PBP 2a-positive S. aureus isolates that are susceptible to antistaphylococcal beta-lactams by conventional methods are functionally resistant to oxacillin. We conclude that the accuracy of the MRSA-Screen latex agglutination method for detection of PBP 2a approaches the accuracy of PCR and is more accurate than any susceptibility testing method used alone for the detection of MRSA.     

COMPARISON OF CEFOXITIN DISC DIFFUSION TEST,OXACILLIN SCREEN AGAR,AND PCR FOR mecA GENE FOR DETECTION OF MRSA

Cefoxitin is a potent inducer of the mecA regulatory system. It is being recommended for detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) when using disk diffusion testing. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of cefoxitin disc diffusion test to characterize MRSA and compare it with oxacillin agar screening and detection of mecA gene by PCR. Materials and Methods: Fifty strains of S. aureus isolated from clinical samples were used in the study. Routine antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed including oxacillin disk. Oxacillin screen agar plates with 4% NaCl and 6 µg/ml of oxacillin were inoculated and interpreted as per standard guidelines. Cefoxitin disc diffusion test was performed using 30 µg disc and zone sizes were measured. PCR for amplification of the mecA gene was performed. Results: Out of the 50 isolates, 28 were found to be methicillin resistant by oxacillin disc diffusion test, 30 were resistant by oxacillin screen agar method, and 32 were resistant with cefoxitin disc diffusion. For these 32 isolates mecA gene was positive. Conclusion: Results of cefoxitin disc diffusion test is in concordance with the PCR for mecA gene. Thus, the test can be an alternative to PCR for detection of MRSA in resource constraint settings.     

mecA gene is widely disseminated in Staphylococcus aureus population

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is one of the most important causes of hospital infections worldwide. High-level resistance to methicillin is caused by the mecA gene, which encodes an alternative penicillin-binding protein, PBP 2a. To determine the clonal relationships between methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and MRSA, we typed 1,069 S. aureus isolates (493 MSSA isolates and 576 MRSA isolates), collected mainly in North American and European hospitals between the 1960s and the year 2000, using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and ribotyping. Of 10 widespread S. aureus lineages recognized, 8 had corresponding mecA-positive strains. Multiresistant MRSA strains are found in hospitals worldwide, while unrelated and more susceptible strains represent less than 1% of the MRSA population. This supports the hypothesis that horizontal transfer plays an important role in the dissemination of the mecA gene in the S. aureus population.     

Rapid Detection of Methicillin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus Isolates by the MRSA-Screen Latex Agglutination Test

The slide agglutination test MRSA-Screen (Denka Seiken Co., Niigata, Japan) was compared with the mecA PCR ("gold standard") for the detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. The MRSA-Screen test detected the penicillin-binding protein 2a (PBP2a) antigen in 87 of 90 genetically diverse methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) stock culture strains, leading to a sensitivity of 97%. The three discrepant MRSA strains displayed positive results only after induction of the mecA gene by exposure to methicillin. Both mecA PCR and MRSA-Screen displayed negative results among the methicillin-susceptible S. aureus strains (n = 106), as well as for Micrococcus spp. (n = 10), members of the family Enterobacteriaceae (n = 10), Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 10), and Enterococcus spp. (n = 10) (specificity = 100%). Producing the same PBP2a antigen, all 10 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis strains score positived in both the latex test and the mecA PCR. Consequently, the MRSA-Screen test should be applied only after identification of the MRSA strain to the species level to rule out coagulase-negative staphylococci. In conclusion, due to excellent specificity and sensitivity the MRSA-Screen latex test has the potential to be successfully used for routine applications in the microbiology laboratory.     

Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by polymerase chain reaction]

The low-affinity penicillin-binding protein (PBP 2') is associated with methicillin-resistance of Staphylococcus aureus and its structural gene (mecA) not present in methicillin-susceptible S. aureus could be detected by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method, in which a 533 bp region of mecA was amplified and detected by agarose gel electrophoresis. Survey for the mecA gene in 210 clinical isolates of S. aureus revealed that, while there was a gross correlation between the presence of the mecA gene and the resistance level to beta-lactams, three strains of mecA (+) tested showed beta-lactam susceptibility similar to those of mecA (-) strains. These three strains did not produce a detectable amount of PBP 2' constitutively nor inducibly, which was the cause of their high susceptibility to beta-lactams. One of them yielded a typical methicillin-resistant variant at a low frequency with a concomitant recovery of PBP 2' production when the bacterial cells of high density were spread onto an agar plate containing 10 micrograms/ml of oxacillin. These findings suggested that typical methicillin resistant S. aureus occurred during chemotherapy with beta-lactam antibiotics even when resistant strains could not be detected by the susceptibility test and thus all mecA (+) strains including those with high susceptibility should be precisely detected.     

Identification of methicillin-resistant strains of staphylococci by polymerase chain reaction.

A simple and reliable method using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was devised to identify methicillin-resistant staphylococci. By using lysates of the strain to be tested as templates and 22-mer oligonucleotides as primers, a 533-bp region of mecA, the structural gene of a low-affinity penicillin-binding protein (PBP 2'), was amplified by PCR and detected by agarose gel electrophoresis. Results obtained by this method were compared with those obtained by broth microdilution MIC determination for 210 and 100 clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci, respectively. Of 99 mecA-negative S. aureus isolates, 100% of the strains were methicillin susceptible and 98% of the strains were oxacillin susceptible. Three strains (3%) of 111 mecA-positive S. aureus isolates exhibited almost the same susceptibility to beta-lactams as the mecA-negative ones and did not produce detectable amounts of PBP 2' despite the presence of the mecA gene. One of them yielded typically methicillin-resistant variants at a low frequency with concomitant recovery of PBP 2' production. The mecA gene was also found in coagulase-negative Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus haemolyticus, Staphylococcus sciuri, Staphylococcus saprophyticus, and Staphylococcus caprae and conferred resistance on most of the bacteria.