Donors With Immune Thrombocytopenia: Do They Pose a Risk to Transplant Recipients?

Transplant‐mediated alloimmune thrombocytopenia (TMAT) from donors with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) can result in significant bleeding complications in the recipient. The risk to a recipient of TMAT if they receive an organ from a donor with ITP is unknown. The outcomes of recipients of organs from deceased donors with ITP recorded in the UK Transplant Registry between 2000 and 2015 were reviewed. Twenty‐one deceased organ donors had a predonation diagnosis of ITP. These donors were significantly more likely to have died from intracranial hemorrhage than were all other deceased organ donors (85% vs. 57%, p < 0.001). Organs from donors with ITP resulted in 49 organ transplants (31 kidney, 14 liver, four heart), with only one case of TMAT, which occurred in a liver transplant recipient and resulted in death from bleeding complications 18 days posttransplantation. The recipient of a kidney from the same organ donor was not affected. Unadjusted 5‐year patient and graft survival was significantly worse for liver transplant recipients from donors with ITP compared with liver transplant recipients from donors without ITP (64% vs. 85%, p = 0.012). Organs from donors with ITP may be considered for transplantation, but livers should be used with caution.     

Human monocytic ehrlichiosis: an emerging pathogen in transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The spectrum of disease caused by Ehrlichia spp. ranges from asymptomatic to fatal. Awareness and early diagnosis of the infection is paramount because appropriate therapy leads to rapid defervescence and cure. If left untreated, particularly in immunosuppressed patients, ehrlichioses may result in multi-system organ failure and death. METHODS: We report the second case of human monocytic ehrlichiosis (HME) in a liver transplant recipient, and review the literature. RESULTS: The patient presented with fever and headache, had negative cultures, and despite broad-spectrum antimicrobial coverage appeared progressively septic. After eliciting a history of tick exposure we treated the patient empirically with doxycycline. The diagnosis of HME was confirmed by 1) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for Ehrlichia chaffeensis, 2) acute and convalescent serum titers, and 3) in vitro cultivation of E chaffeensis from peripheral blood. CONCLUSION: Although human ehrlichioses are relatively uncommon, they are emerging as clinically significant arthropod-borne infections. Although epidemiological exposure is responsible for infection, immunosuppression makes patients more likely to succumb to disease. A high index of suspicion and early treatment results in a favorable outcome.     

Aspergillus infections after lung transplantation: clinical differences in type of transplant and implications for management.

BACKGROUND: Invasive aspergillosis is a serious opportunistic infection in lung transplant recipients. It has not been fully discerned whether there are differences in the characteristics, risk factors and outcome of Aspergillus infection in single as compared with bilateral lung transplant recipients. METHODS: English-language articles identified by a MEDLINE search through December 2000 and bibliographies were used as data sources to identify cases of Aspergillus infections in lung transplant recipients. The studies selected had to have provided a definition of invasive aspergillosis to distinguish colonization from infection. RESULTS: The median incidence of Aspergillus infections in lung transplant recipients was 6.2%. In total, 58% (45 of 78) of the Aspergillus infections were tracheobronchitis or bronchial anastomotic infections, 32% (25 of 78) were invasive pulmonary, and 22% (25 of 78) were disseminated infections. Single lung transplant recipients with Aspergillus infections were significantly older (p = 0.006), more likely to have had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as an underlying illness (p = 0.05), more likely to have developed Aspergillus infections later after transplantation (p = 0.019), and tended to have a higher incidence of invasive aspergillosis (p = 0.11) than all other lung transplant recipients. Overall mortality in lung transplant recipients with Aspergillus infections was 52%. Single lung transplant recipients (p = 0.03), and patients with late-onset infections (occurring at least 3 months after transplantation ([p = 0.045]) infections had significantly higher mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Single lung transplant recipients with Aspergillus infections had an overall greater morbidity and poorer outcome than other types of lung transplant recipients. Recognition of the unique characteristics of Aspergillus infections in single lung (vs bilateral or heart-lung) transplant recipients has implications relevant for the management of lung transplant recipients with aspergillosis.     

Babesiosis in a renal transplant recipient acquired through blood transfusion

BACKGROUND: The success of organ-replacement therapies has resulted in a population of chronically immunosuppressed but active people who experience increased vulnerability to tick-borne zoonoses. Several of these infections may be life threatening. Human babesiosis is an emerging zoonosis that is transmitted by the same tick that transmits Lyme disease and human granulocytic ehrlichiosis. METHODS: We briefly review these zoonoses and present a case of a renal transplant recipient who survived infection by Babesia microti contracted through blood transfusion. RESULTS: A recipient of a living-related renal transplant developed acute postoperative hemolytic anemia. The etiology of this anemia was diagnosed by peripheral red blood cell smear as Babesia microti. The patient was managed by a reduction in transplant immunosuppressive therapy and administration of clindamycin and quinine antimicrobials. CONCLUSIONS: Transplant patients may contract babesiosis after tick exposure and/or via blood transfusion. The diagnosis of babesiosis may be confused with malaria and should be included in the differential diagnosis of posttransplant hemolytic-uremic syndrome in organ transplant patients.     

Effect of body mass index on the survival benefit of liver transplantation.

Obese patients are at higher risk for morbidity and mortality after liver transplantation (LT) than nonobese recipients. However, there are no reports assessing the survival benefit of LT according to recipient body mass index (BMI). A retrospective cohort of liver transplant candidates who were initially wait-listed between September 2001 and December 2004 was identified in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database. Adjusted Cox regression models were fitted to assess the association between BMI and liver transplant survival benefit (posttransplantation vs. waiting list mortality). During the study period, 25,647 patients were placed on the waiting list. Of these, 4,488 (17%) underwent LT by December 31, 2004. At wait-listing and transplantation, similar proportions were morbidly obese (BMI>or=40; 3.8% vs. 3.4%, respectively) and underweight (BMI<20; 4.5% vs. 4.0%, respectively). Underweight patients experienced a significantly higher covariate-adjusted risk of death on the waiting list (hazard ratio [HR]=1.61; P<0.0001) compared to normal weight candidates (BMI 20 to <25), but underweight recipients had a similar risk of posttransplantation death (HR=1.28; P=0.15) compared to recipients of normal weight. In conclusion, compared to patients on the waiting list with a similar BMI, all subgroups of liver transplant recipients demonstrated a significant (P<0.0001) survival benefit, including morbidly obese and underweight recipients. Our results suggest that high or low recipient BMI should not be a contraindication for LT.     

Influence of hyperglycemia and hyperuricemia on long-term transplant survival in kidney transplant recipients

Long-term prognosis in kidney transplant recipients depends on multiple factors. The purpose of this study was to quantify the influence of hyperuricemia and hyperglycemia (elements of the so-called 'syndrome X', i.e., a combination of metabolic disorders like hyperuricemia, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension) on organ function in 350 kidney transplant recipients who had received 375 kidney transplants up to 1990 and in whom sex, age of recipient and donor, nephrologic disease, duration of dialysis, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) classification, and duration of transplant ischemia had been well matched. We found the influence of hyperuricemia on graft survival to be statistically significant (p < or = 0.05), while a statistically significant correlation between hyperglycemia and graft survival could not be detected in the present study. The transplant survival rates 2, 4, and 5 yr post-kidney-transplantation were 96.7, 80.7, and 78.7 in normogylcemic patients vs. 96.9, 85, and 82.7% in hyperglycemic ( > 100 mg,dL) kidney transplant recipients (p > 0.05). Transplant survival in hyperuricemic patients (male, > 8 mg dL; female, > 6.2 mg/dL) 2, 4, and 5 yr post-transplantation was significantly reduced (92.2, 70.6, and 68.8% vs. 98.1, 85.6, and 83.3%), as compared to normouricemic recipients. A combined presence of both hyperuricemia and hyperglycemia probably influencing the prognosis post-kidney-transplantation failed to reach the level of statistical significance. We found a significant correlation between age of recipients and plasma glucose (p < or = 0.01) and between serum uric acid concentrations and diuretic therapy (p < or = 0.05) and gender (p < or = 0.(5). In conclusion, hyperuricemia after kidney transplantation seems to reduce graft survival, whereas an influence of the carbohydrate metabolism has to be denied.     

Identifying a targeted population at high risk for infections after liver transplantation in the MELD era

Sun H‐Y, Cacciarelli TV, Singh N. Identifying a targeted population at high risk for infections after liver transplantation in the MELD era.
Clin Transplant 2011: 25: 420–425. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Impact of model for end‐stage liver disease (MELD) scoring system on post‐transplant infections and associated risk factors are unknown. Infections <90 d post‐transplant were assessed in 277 consecutive liver transplant recipients from 1999 to 2008. “High‐risk” factors for infections were pre‐defined as MELD score >30, ICU stay >48 h prior to transplant, intraoperative transfusion ≥15 units, retransplantation, post‐transplant dialysis, or reoperation. Of the 240 recipients in the MELD era (2002–2008), 48.5% had any high‐risk factor. The OR for infection was 1.69, 2.00, 18.00, and 4.50 in recipients with any 1, 2, 3, and ≥4 high‐risk factors, respectively (χ² for trend, p < 0.001). In logistic regression model, recipient age (OR 1.12, p < 0.05) and any high‐risk factor (OR 2.42, p < 0.05) were associated with infections. Compared with 37 pre‐MELD recipients, the overall infections and mortality at 12 months did not differ in the two eras. In Cox regression model, recipient age (OR 1.09, p < 0.05) and any high‐risk factor (OR 2.42, p < 0.05) remained associated with infections. The overall frequency of infections did not increase in the MELD era. Pre‐defined risk factors accurately predicted the risk of infections in these patients.     

Successful bilateral lung transplant outcomes in recipients 61 years of age and older

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists regarding the optimal use of bilateral lung transplant (BLT) in older recipients in diseases where either single or bilateral transplant is appropriate. International Society for Heart and Lung Transplant (ISHLT) guidelines suggest an upper age limit of 60 for BLT, despite limited data regarding outcomes with BLT in patients over 60. We hypothesize that BLT offers comparable, if not superior, clinical outcomes to SLT in all patients independent of recipient age. METHODS: In order to test our hypothesis, we conducted a case-control study to compare the effect of transplant operation on survival and the onset of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) in consecutive lung transplant recipients 61 years of age or older using Kaplan- Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: We identified 107 consecutive lung transplant recipients 61 or older at the time of transplant. Patients received SLT (n=46) or BLT (n=61) based on donor organ availability. Comparable survival was achieved with BLT in older patients vs. SLT P=0.19). One-, two-, and five-year survival estimates in BLT were 82%, 75% and 68%, respectively, vs. in SLT 78%, 70% and 44%, respectively. A comparable onset of BOS was also observed in the patients who received BLT vs. SLT (P=0.23). CONCLUSION: Successful short- and medium-term outcomes are achieved with BLT in older recipients and are comparable to those achieved with SLT. Our results suggest that age over 60 should not exclude patients from consideration of BLT.     

Recipient Outcomes for Expanded Criteria Living Kidney Donors: The Disconnect Between Current Evidence and Practice

Older individuals or those with medical complexities are undergoing living donor nephrectomy more than ever before. Transplant outcomes for recipients of kidneys from these living expanded criteria donors are largely uncertain. We systematically reviewed studies from 1980 to June 2008 that described transplant outcomes for recipients of kidneys from expanded criteria living donors. Results were organized by the following criteria: older age, obesity, hypertension, reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR), proteinuria and hematuria. Pairs of reviewers independently evaluated each citation and abstracted data on study and donor characteristics, recipient survival, graft survival, serum creatinine and GFR. Transplant outcomes for recipients of kidneys from older donors (≥60 years) were described in 31 studies. Recipients of kidneys from older donors had poorer 5-year patient and graft survival than recipients of kidneys from younger donors [meta-analysis of 12 studies, 72% vs. 80%, unadjusted relative risk (RR) of survival 0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83–0.95]. In meta-regression, this association diminished over time (1980s RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65–0.96 vs. 1990s RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.85–0.99). Few transplant outcomes were described for other expanded criteria. This disconnect between donor selection and a lack of knowledge of recipient outcomes should give transplant decision-makers pause and sets an agenda for future research.     

Chronic Hepatitis E in Heart Transplant Recipients

Chronic courses of hepatitis E virus (HEV) infections have been described in immunosuppressed patients. We aimed to study the role of HEV infections in heart transplant recipients (HTR). 274 HTR were prospectively screened for HEV infection using an anti‐HEV‐IgG ELISA and HEV‐PCR. In addition, 137 patients undergoing cardiac surgery (non‐HTR) and 537 healthy subjects were studied cross‐sectionally. The anti‐HEV‐IgG seroprevalence was 11% in HTR, 7% in non‐HTR and 2% in healthy controls (HTR vs. healthy controls p<0.0001; non‐HTR vs. healthy controls p<0.01). Anti‐HEV tested positive in 4.0% in control cohorts of other immunocompromised patients (n = 474). Four HTR (1.5%) were chronically infected with HEV as shown by HEV‐PCR and all four patients had liver transaminases of >200 IU/L and histological or clinical evidence of advanced liver disease. In three patients ribavirin treatment was successful with a sustained biochemical and virological response while treatment failed in one cirrhotic patient after ribavirin dose reduction. Heart transplant recipients and patients undergoing cardiac surgery have an increased risk for HEV infections. Chronic hepatitis E may explain elevated liver enzymes in heart transplant recipients. Treatment of HEV infection with ribavirin is effective but the optimal dose and duration of ribavirin therapy remains to be determined.     

Variation in Biliary Complication Rates Following Liver Transplantation: Implications for Cost and Outcome

Although biliary complications (BCs) have a significant impact on the outcome of liver transplantation (LT), variation in BC rates among transplant centers has not been previously analyzed. BC rate, LT outcome and spending were assessed using linked Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and Medicare claims (n = 16 286 LTs). Transplant centers were assigned to BC quartiles based upon risk‐adjusted observed to expected (O:E) ratio of BC separately for donation after brain death (DBD) and donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors. The median incidence of BC was 300% greater in the highest versus lowest DBD quartiles (19.0% vs. 5.9%) and varied 250% between DCD quartiles (20.3%–8.4%). Donor and recipient characteristics suggest that high BC centers actually used lower donor risk index organs, fewer split livers and fewer imports (p < 0.001 for all). Transplant at a center in the highest O:E quartile was associated with increased posttransplant mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.53, p = 0.007) in DCD transplant and increased graft loss (aHR 1.21, p = 0.02) in DBD transplant. Medicare spending was $22 895 (p < 0.0001) higher at centers in highest versus lowest BC quartile. In summary, BC rates vary widely among transplant centers and higher rates are a marker for an increased risk of death, graft failure and health‐care spending.     

Human papillomavirus in the oral cavity of patients with and without renal transplantation

This study investigates human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in the oral cavities of 88 Australian renal transplant recipients and 88 immunocompetent controls. Oral cavities were examined for lesions and brushings collected for HPV analysis by consensus PCR. No warts were identified; HPV DNA was detected in 18% of transplant versus 1% control samples (P<0.001). Cutaneous HPVs predominated. One patient had HPV16 in samples taken four years apart without evidence of associated lesions or malignancy. Transplant recipients were more likely than controls to have current cutaneous warts (P<0.001), fewer sexual partners (P=0.001), and to have never consumed alcohol (P=0.01). Among the transplant group, the risk of an HPV-positive sample was higher among older patients (P=0.05), and those with past cutaneous warts (P=0.04). This study extends previous surveys by encompassing overt and asymptomatic infection, a broad spectrum of cutaneous and genital HPVs, and by providing new data on risk factors for oral HPV infection.     

Rabbit antithymocyte induction and dosing in deceased donor renal transplant recipients over 60 yr of age

Patel SJ, Knight RJ, Suki WN, Abdellatif A, Duhart BT, Krauss AG, Mannan S, Nezakatgoo N, Gaber AO. Rabbit antithymocyte induction and dosing in deceased donor renal transplant recipients over 60 yr of age.
Clin Transplant 2011: 25: E250–E256. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Background: Antithymocyte globulin (rATG) is a commonly used induction agent in renal transplantation; however, data in older kidney recipients are limited. Methods: We reviewed charts of 301 deceased donor renal transplants who received a protocol consisting of 3–7 doses of rATG and triple maintenance therapy. Outcomes of patients >60 yr of age (n = 45) were compared to those aged 18–59 yr (n = 256). Results: Older recipients had more diabetics, were more likely to receive expanded criteria donor kidneys (p < 0.01), and over 30% were sensitized. Recipients >60 received less cumulative rATG (4.6 vs. 5.1 mg/kg; p < 0.01). Three‐yr acute rejection was lower in the >60 group (2% vs. 16%, p < 0.01) although glomerular filtration rates were similar between groups. Actuarial graft survival was similar; however, patient survival in the >60 group at three yr was lower (80% vs. 95%; p = 0.02). Specifically, patients >60 with delayed graft function and rATG cumulative dosing >6 mg/kg had a survival of <50% by two yr. Conclusion: Recipients over 60 yr receiving rATG induction have acceptable renal function and a low risk of rejection; however, reduced survival was noted among those receiving >6 mg/kg. These data suggest that when used, lower cumulative dosages of rATG are preferable in the older recipient.     

Mortality Assessment for Pancreas Transplants

We determined and compared the mortality of pancreas transplant recipients and of patients on the pancreas waiting lists by using United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and International Pancreas Transplant Registry (IPTR) data. From January 1, 1995, through May 31, 2003, a total of 12,478 patients were listed for a simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplant; 2942 for a pancreas after (previous) kidney transplant (PAK); and 1207 for a pancreas transplant alone (PTA). In this retrospective observational cohort study, patients with multiple listings at different transplant centers and patients who changed transplant centers were counted only once. The Social Security Death Master File (SSDMF) and the UNOS kidney transplant database were used to update mortality information. By univariate analyses, 4-year patient survival rates on the waiting lists (vs. post-transplant), in the SPK category, were 58.7% (vs. 90.3%); in the PAK category, 81.7% (vs. 88.3%); and in the PTA category, 87.3% (vs. 90.5%). Up to one-third of recipient deaths after post-transplant day 90 were not related to the transplant procedure itself. Multivariate analyses showed that the overall mortality in all three categories was not increased after transplantation (for SPK recipients only, it was significantly decreased). In summary, the mortality for solitary pancreas transplant recipients is not higher than for wait-listed patients.     

Incidence and clinical predictors of primary opportunistic deep cutaneous mycoses in solid organ transplant recipients: a multicenter cohort study

Tessari G, Naldi L, Piaserico S, Boschiero L, Nacchia F, Forni A, Rugiu C, Faggian G, Dall’Olio E, Fortina AB, Alaibac M, Sassi F, Gotti E, Fiocchi R, Fagioli S, Girolomoni G. Incidence and clinical predictors of primary opportunistic deep cutaneous mycoses in solid organ transplant recipients: a multicenter cohort study.
Clin Transplant 2010: 24: 328–333. © 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Background: Primary opportunistic deep cutaneous fungal
infections may cause significant morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplant recipients (OTR), but no data exist about their incidence, timing, and clinical predictors in a long‐term follow‐up. Patients and methods: A series of 3293 consecutive OTR including 1991 kidney, 929 heart, and 373 liver transplant recipients were enrolled. Patients were regularly followed up since time at transplantation (mean 5.5 yr ±5.9 SD) and primary opportunistic fungal infections registered. Persons‐year at risk (PYs), incidence rates (IR), incidence rate ratios (IRR), and 95% confidence intervals were computed. Results: Twenty‐two cases of deep cutaneous mycoses were detected, (IR 1.2 cases per 1000 PYs) after a mean follow‐up time since transplantation of 2.5 yr ± 2.0 SD (median 1.8 yr). Six patients had subsequent systemic involvement and three patients died of systemic dissemination. A higher risk for mycoses was observed in the first two yr after transplantation, (IRR 35.9, p < 0.0001), in renal transplant recipients (IRR 5.1 p = 0.030), and in patients transplanted after the age of 50 (IRR 11.5 p = 0.020). Conclusions: Primary deep cutaneous opportunistic mycoses in OTR occur mainly in the first two yr after transplantation, in renal transplant recipients, and in older patients.     

Long-Term Prospective Study of Steroid Withdrawal in Kidney and Heart Transplant Recipients

A large prospective study of steroid withdrawal was performed within the framework of the Collaborative Transplant Study to analyze long-term graft and patient outcome in renal and heart transplant recipients. Steroids were withdrawn no earlier than 6 months posttransplantation. A comparison of 7-year outcomes in renal transplant recipients (94% receiving cyclosporine; 97% Caucasian) showed a benefit of steroid withdrawal versus steroid continuation in retrospectively matched controls, for graft survival (81.9%± 1.8% vs. 75.3%± 1.2%, p = 0.0001), patient survival (88.8%± 1.5% vs. 84.3 ± 1.0%; p = 0.0016) and death-censored graft survival (91.8%± 1.3% vs. 87.9%± 1.0%: p = 0.0091). Steroid withdrawal was associated with improved graft survival in heart recipients also (76.2%± 2.4% vs. 66.9%± 1.7%, p = 0.0008). A total of 58.6% of renal recipients and 44.3% of heart recipients never required steroids during follow up. Rates of acute rejection and renal dysfunction did not differ between steroid-free and steroid-continuation groups. Steroid withdrawal was associated with significantly improved cardiovascular risk factors compared with steroid continuation. Rates of the development of osteoporosis and cataracts did not differ in the entire patient cohort, but were strikingly lower in patients taken off steroids during the first posttransplant year.     

Community acquired respiratory viral infections after lung transplantation: clinical features and long-term consequences

Community acquired respiratory viruses (CARVs) are increasingly recognized as serious threats to lung transplant recipients. While CARVs such as respiratory syncytial virus, parainfluenza, influenza, and adenovirus usually cause self-limited illnesses in immunocompetent subjects, infections in the transplant recipient can be dramatic. As transplant recipients live longer and diagnostic methods improve, the burden of CARVs will undoubtedly increase. Because of limited therapeutic options, some patients may succumb to CARV infections, while many survivors develop chronic allograft dysfunction. Recognition of this latter phenomenon has implicated CARVs in the pathogenesis of bronchiolitis obliterans.     

Retroactive application of the new kidney allocation system to renal transplants performed in the ECD/SCD era

The kidney allocation system (KAS) aims to improve deceased donor kidney transplant outcomes by matching of donor allografts and kidney recipients using the kidney donor risk index (KDRI) and recipient estimated post‐transplant survival (EPTS) indices. In this single‐center study, KAS was retroactively applied to 573 adult deceased donor kidney transplants (2004–2012) performed in the extended criteria/standard criteria donor (ECD/SCD) era. Donor KDRI and recipient EPTS were calculated, and transplants were analyzed to identify KAS fits. These were defined as allocation of top 20% allografts to top 20% recipients and bottom 80% allografts to bottom 80% recipients. On retroactive calculation, 70.2% of all transplants fit the KAS. Transplants that fit the KAS had inferior 1‐ and 5‐yr patient survival (95.5% vs. 98.8%, p = 0.048, and 83.4% vs. 91.7%, p = 0.018) and similar 1‐ and 5‐yr graft survival compared to transplants that did not fit the KAS (91.3% vs. 94.1%, p = 0.276, and 72.7% vs. 73.9%, p = 0.561). While EPTS correlated with recipient survival (HR = 2.96, p < 0.001), KDRI correlated with both recipient (HR = 3.56, p < 0.001) and graft survival (HR = 3.23, p < 0.001). Overall, retroactive application of the KAS to transplants performed in the ECD/SCD era did not identify superior patient survival for kidneys allocated in accordance with the KAS.     

Increased arterial stiffness in cyclosporine-treated lung transplant recipients early after transplantation

BACKGROUND: The majority of patients undergoing solid organ transplantation develop hypertension, to which cyclosporine (CsA)-induced peripheral vasoconstriction may contribute. We hypothesized that CsA-treated transplant recipients have an increased basal vascular tone and an altered response to nitric oxide. To test this hypothesis arterial resistance, non-endothelial dependent relaxation and arterial stiffness were investigated in CsA-treated lung transplant recipients within 18 months after transplantation. METHODS: In study 1, forearm blood flow (FBF) was measured by venous occlusion plethysmography at baseline and during glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) and N(G)-monomethyl-l-arginine acetate (l-NMMA) infusion in seven lung transplant recipients and nine healthy subjects. In study 2, arterial stiffness in carotid (CCA) and radial artery (RA) was measured by ultrasound (echo-tracking) in 10 lung transplant recipients, 12 healthy subjects and six patients waiting for lung transplantation. RESULTS: Basal FBF (3.1 +/- 0.2 vs. 3.0 +/- 0.3 mL/min, p = 0.79) and forearm arterial resistance (36 +/- 3 vs. 33 +/- 3 mmHg/mL/min, p = 0.60) did not differ between transplant recipients and controls. GTN infusion increased and l-NMMA decreased blood flow equally in both groups. Transplant recipients had increased arterial stiffness compared to both pre-transplant patients and healthy subjects (CCA stiffness index 11.7 +/- 1.1 vs. 8.5 +/- 0.2 and 8.6 +/- 0.6, p < 0.05 both; RA stiffness index 14.7 +/- 1.5 vs. 8.9 +/- 1.3 and 10.6 +/- 0.7, p < 0.05 both). CONCLUSIONS: Forearm blood flow and arterial resistance did not differ between healthy subjects and cyclosporine-treated lung transplant recipients early after transplantation. Increased arterial stiffness was demonstrated in transplant recipients, which may have implications for future development of transplant hypertension.     

Outcomes of renal transplantation for recipients with lupus nephritis: analysis of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database

Prior analyses of transplant outcomes in lupus transplant recipients have not consisted of multivariate analyses in the modern immunosuppressive era. Here, we compared patient and graft outcomes in lupus and non-lupus recipients transplanted between 1996 to 2000 using the United Network of Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement Transplant Network database. We evaluated the impact of recipient and donor demographic factors, time on dialysis and the initial immunosuppression regimen on rejection rates and transplant outcomes. Univariate analysis showed similar graft but better patient survival rates for primary lupus and non-lupus transplant recipients (5-year patient survival rates for lupus cohort 85.2% for deceased donor transplants and 92.1% for living donor transplants as opposed to 82.1% and 89.8% respectively for the non-lupus cohort; P=0.05 and 0.03) but similar patient survival rates for deceased donor retransplant patients. After controlling for confounding factors, no differences in patient or graft survival were seen between the two groups. No difference in acute rejection rates were observed in deceased donor transplants, but there was a small but significant increase in the risk of acute rejection in living donor lupus transplant recipients (hazard ratio=1.19, P=0.05). Risk of graft failure was lower for deceased donor recipients receiving MMF (five-year graft loss rate=29.6% for MMF vs. 40.2% for those not receiving MMF, P<0.0001), but no differences were seen among living donor recipients. Outcomes were similar regardless of type of calcineurin inhibitor, induction therapy, and time on dialysis. We conclude that lupus transplant recipients have outcomes generally equivalent to non-lupus transplant recipients.