Periodontal treatment needs, by CPITN, among employees of a Jerusalem hospital.

A survey, employing the Community Periodontal Index of Treatment Needs (CPITN), was conducted among 344 employees of a Jerusalem hospital. Of the population surveyed, 2.2 per cent demonstrated totally healthy mouths, 1.5 per cent had, at the worst, bleeding symptoms, 13.3 per cent had calculus, 53.4 per cent had 4-5 mm ('shallow' according to WHO) pockets and 29.6 per cent had deep pockets (6 mm or more) as their worst CPITN scores. Results revealed an average of 0.55 edentulous sextants, 0.68 healthy sextants, 0.87 sextants with bleeding symptoms, 1.36 with calculus, 1.95 with 4-5 mm pockets and 0.61 sextants with deep pockets. In general, females were healthier than males, had a significantly greater number of healthy sextants, less sextants with calculus and less sextants with deep pockets. A deterioration in periodontal health with age was evident, according to mean number of sextants per person by CPITN scores. Associations were also analysed between CPITN and demographic variables. Few significant associations were revealed. Based on FDI and WHO estimates, the calculated periodontal treatment needs for the hospital employees was found to be about 2 hours per person. Compared with data for other countries, as reported by the WHO, this status demands serious efforts to be made towards periodontal health promotion.     

Periodontal treatment needs in a native island community in Colombia determined with CPITN

AIMS: To identify the prevalence and different degrees of periodontal disease in an isolated community (Isla Grande, Colombia) with no dental services and low educational level with the use of CPITN, and to establish periodontal treatment needs in different age groups. RESULTS: Of 116 people examined, 0.9% were in periodontal health (CPITN value 0), 18.1% had gingival bleeding (CPITN value 1), 51.7% had supra or subgingival calculus (CPITN value 2), 18.1% presented pockets 3.5-5.0 mm deep (CPITN value 3), and 11.2% had pathological pockets of 5.5mm or deeper (CPITN value 4). No clear differences were observed between sexes. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that 81% of the sample has some type of periodontal treatment need, with 69.8% of them requiring periodontal treatment that may be supplied by a hygienist and 11.2% requiring specialised treatment. Implementation of oral health education and oral prevention programmes was recommended to the authorities for this community.     

Periodontal condition and treatment needs (CPITN) in the Bulgarian population aged over 60 years

AIM: To investigate the periodontal condition and treatment needs of elderly people in Bulgaria. SUBJECTS: 653 subjects over 60 years of age (263 males and 390 females). METHOD: The study was carried out in 1999 using WHO recommended survey techniques. The analysis included only the results of the subjects eligible for assessment using CPITN, 497 subjects (206 males and 291 females). RESULTS: More than 88% of the subjects were affected by periodontal disease of various severity. The percentage of subjects with pathological pockets (CPITN 3, 4) increased with age. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison to the large needs of periodontal therapy in general, the complex treatment needs (TN 3) were relatively small. The major volume of needs related to periodontal care lie within the competence of the general dental practitioner to treat.     

Periodontal conditions in 35-44 and 65-74-year-old adults in Denmark

OBJECTIVES: To assess the periodontal health status in the Danish adult population and to analyze how the level of periodontal health is associated with age, gender, urbanization, socio-economic factors, and dental visiting habits; furthermore, to compare the periodontal health status of Danish adults with that of adults in other industrialized countries. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study of a random sample of 1,115 Danish adults aged 35-44 years and 65-74 years. Data were collected by means of personal interviews and by clinical examinations in accordance with the World Health Organization Basic Methods Criteria. RESULTS: The clinical examination revealed a low prevalence of healthy periodontal conditions in both age groups: at age 35-44 years 7.7% and at age 65-74 years 2.4% had healthy periodontal conditions. A high proportion of the elderly had scores of severe periodontal health; more than 82% of older participants had pockets of 4-5 mm or deeper against 42% in younger adults. In both age groups, the mean number of teeth with periodontal pockets deeper than 4-5 mm was high in individuals with low education. Only a weak association between periodontal health and income was found. High Community Periodontal Index scores were seen for irregular dental visitors, but in the 35-44-year-olds deep periodontal pockets were more often seen among young regular dental visitors. The multivariate analysis showed that participants with low or medium levels of education had significantly more teeth with shallow and deep pockets than those with high education. Persons with regular dental visiting habits had fewer teeth with gingival bleeding, shallow and deep pockets than individuals with irregular dental visiting habits. CONCLUSION: Reorientation of the Danish dental health-care services is needed with further emphasis on preventive care, and public health programs should focus on risk factors shared by chronic diseases in order to improve the periodontal health of Danish adults.     

Dental health status and treatment needs of elderly residents of Edmonton, Alberta

The oral health of 140 independent elderly volunteers, selected from different sections of Edmonton, Alberta, was assessed in conjunction with their nutritional and medical status, in an attempt to evaluate the dental needs of this population. Dental caries was assessed using WHO standards and the CPITN was used in assessing periodontal and gingival health needs. The mean age of the participants was 70.9 +/- 2.6 years. The average time since they had last seen a dentist was 3.0 +/- 6.2 years. Twenty-six percent of the group were edentulous and wore full dentures. An evaluation of denture hygiene and retention showed that 53 per cent of all maxillary and 57 per cent of all mandibular appliances exhibited poor hygiene; 33 per cent and 54 per cent, respectively, had problems with retention and/or occlusion. Only 12 per cent of the group exhibited any sort of mucosal pathology, all of which was related to ill fitting dentures. The total population had a mean of 15.0 +/- 11.1 teeth, only 0.5 of these were decayed, while 8.9 were restored. CPITN scores taken from a total of 511 sextants with standing teeth showed that 16 per cent of the group exhibited bleeding upon probing, 29 per cent had calculus, 13 per cent exhibited pocketing, while 3.6 per cent had deep pockets. Sixty-seven per cent of the population required dental treatment, none of whom needed emergency intervention. Over 49 per cent of the dentate population could benefit from prophylaxis; 16 per cent required more definitive periodontal treatment. Forty-five per cent of the denture population required treatment.     

Use of CPITN cross-tabulations--a research perspective

In earlier years, studies on the epidemiology of periodontal disease were often reported in the form of mean scores for the population studied. Use of the WHO recommended Community Periodontal Index of Treatment Needs (CPITN) has given important additional information, particularly about the distribution of indicators of current periodontal disease within various age groups of the population. In the analysis of survey data, the use of CPITN cross-tabulations has been found particularly promising for the assessment of both preventive and therapeutic needs. For example, in Finnish schoolchildren the proportion of subjects with two or more sextants scoring Code 2 for calculus increased from 0 per cent at age 7 to 5 per cent at age 12 and 9 per cent at age 17 years. In the same population, 0 per cent at 7, 1 per cent at 12, and 4 per cent at 17 years of age had one or more pockets measuring more than 3 mm. In another population, comprising dentate adults from rural Finland, the prevalence of Code 4 for 6 mm or deeper pockets increased from 1 per cent at age 25 to 6 per cent at age 35, 18 per cent at age 50, and 27 per cent at 65 years of age. An important additional observation was that a total of 58 per cent of those who had one or more Code 4's, had their advanced periodontal disease confined to only one sextant. The latter finding may prove useful when deciding between partial and full mouth examinations in future epidemiological studies.     

Periodontal treatment needs of patients with renal disease receiving haemodialysis

AIM/OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to perform periodontal assessment, using the CPITN index, on patients undergoing renal dialysis. METHODS: The periodontal conditions of 342 subjects undergoing renal dialysis from eight renal dialysis centres were examined using CPITN. Subjects were distributed into four age groups, 16-19, 20-34, 35-44 and > or =45 years. The study was conducted during a 6-month period. All clinical examinations were performed by one examiner. RESULTS: There was a significant positive relationship between the CPITN scores and age (r=0.164, p=0.002) and dialysis duration (r = 0.240, p=0.000). There was no statistically significant difference between male and female patients (p>0.05). None of the age groups had healthy sextants. The 35-44 year-age group had a higher number of sextants with deep pockets (0.19) than the other age groups and edentulous sextants were the highest among the oldest age group (1.89). CONCLUSION: A very small portion of the renal dialysis population is affected by severe forms of periodontitis requiring complex periodontal treatment. However, all such patients should be given oral hygiene education as a priority.     

Assessment of periodontal disease in an adult population survey in Taipei city using CPITN and GPM/T indices

The community periodontal index of treatment needs (CPITN) has been recommended for epidemiological surveys of periodontal status and treatment needs. The prevalence of gingivitis, periodontitis and missing teeth in a study population has been determined using the CPITN and GPM/T (gingivitis: periodontitis: missing teeth) indices. In this study, a survey of periodontal disease was performed among the adult population of Taipei City using the CPITN index. A total of 673 dentated persons (male 339, 50.4%; female 334, 49.6%) were examined and surveyed. Data were then divided into five age groups, 15-19, 20-29, 30-44, 45-64 and 64+. The prevalence of periodontal disease was analyzed using the percentage or sextant from all teeth. Treatment needs were determined by the worst periodontal score per sextant. It was found that about 91% of subjects suffered from various degrees of periodontal disease in at least one tooth. Gingivitis and periodontitis were 86.9% and 33%, respectively. Among them 48.9% had missing teeth. The prevalence of periodontitis and missing teeth increased with age. Most of them involved oral hygiene instruction and scaling. About 11.0% of the subjects needed periodontal surgery. Higher proportions of attachment loss with gingival recession caused by destructive periodontal disease were found in older persons who did not require periodontal surgery. It was concluded that endemic gingivitis and calculus, a moderate prevalence of shallow pockets and a low prevalence of deep pockets were observed among adults in this group in Taipei City and that the CPITN is a practical epidemiological and public health method for screening the periodontal status and treatment needs of a population.     

Community periodontal index of treatment needs and prevalence of periodontal conditions

BACKGROUND/AIMS: In 1977, the World Health Organization (WHO) proposed a new index, the community periodontal index of treatment needs (CPITN) to evaluate the periodontal treatment needs of populations. The aim of this study is to compare different approaches of recording and presenting the CPITN. METHODS: A sample of 2110 subjects aged 35-44 years were examined between September 1994 and July 1995, throughout the province of Quebec, Canada. For each tooth (3rd molars excluded), the presence of bleeding and calculus, the level of epithelial attachment, and the depth of periodontal pockets were measured. Periodontal pocket depths were measured from the edge of the free gingiva, at 2 sites (mesiovestibular and vestibular), as well as all around the tooth. RESULTS: Only 8.5% of adults had at least one tooth with a 6 mm or deeper periodontal pocket when probing on 2 sites, whereas if probing is done all around the tooth, this percentage is 2.5x higher (21.4%). The partial recording of pocket depths (10 index teeth recommended by WHO, or 2 quadrants chosen at random) resulted in an underestimation of the prevalence of subjects with at least one tooth with a periodontal pocket (CPITN score 3 and 4). Among subjects with at least one tooth with a 6 mm or deeper periodontal pocket, 12% were not detected with the 10 index teeth recording, and 25% go undetected with the measure on 2 quadrants. Finally, using the % of subjects with periodontal pockets overestimates the prevalence of deep pockets compared with using sextants. Indeed, close to 30.0% of sextants have no treatment needs, whereas only 5.2% of subjects are in this category. Similarly, 7.7% of sextants have at least one tooth with a 6 mm or deeper periodontal pocket, yet there are 3x more subjects in this category (21.4%).     

Periodontal status of a subject sample of Yemen

Abstract From August to October 1991, the periodontal status of 1001 Yemenis representing the age groups 12-14, 15-19, 20-24 and 35-44 years was recorded and evaluated with preference to the CPITN, the calculus index and clinical attachment levels. The impact of chewing khat, the leaves of a cultivated, alkaloid shrub, and of using the traditional miswak chewing stick for oral hygiene purposes were investigated. The results show that 6.9% of the juvenile probands (15-19 years) had healthy periodontal tissue (CPITN 0). whereas bleeding on probing and calculus (CPITN 1+2) were registered in 86.2%. In the 35-44 year age group. 1.7% were periodontally healthy, whereas 84.5% displayed plaque retention or shallow pocketing (CPITN 2-3) and 12.5% deep pocketing (CPITN 4). The treatment needs in all age groups are confined primarily to calculus removal and instruction in oral hygiene. The clinical attachment level and the calculus index revealed age-related attachment loss and calculus formation, primarily among male probands. The higher khat consumption among the male population is reflected in its detrimental effect on the periodontal tissue, especially among younger probands. Oral hygiene aids have also an influence on periodontal status, with a toothbrush proving more efficient than the miswak. WHO efforts directed towards prophylactic programs need to be intensified but can be staffed by dental hygienists.     

CPITN assessment of periodontal disease in diabetic patients

The aim of this study was to investigate, using the CPITN system, the periodontal treatment needs in diabetic patients, and to shed additional light on the possible effects of the duration and control of diabetes on the periodontal status in these patients. A comparison was made between 222 diabetic patients (mean age, 46.9 years) and 189 control subjects (mean age, 43.9 years). Edentulous patients were not included in the study. The results indicated that diabetic patients demonstrated significantly more missing teeth (P less than 0.001). The mean number of missing sextants was also significantly higher in diabetics. Pathologic pockets of 6 mm or more were found in 1.3 and 0.3 sextants in the diabetic and control group subjects, respectively (P less than 0.001). Up to the age of 34, no differences were observed between the diabetic and control group subjects regarding pathologic pockets of 6 mm or more. Above this age, diabetics demonstrated significantly more sextants with deep pockets (P less than 0.001). Concerning the type of diabetes, no differences related to CPITN score were found between insulin dependent and non-insulin dependent diabetics. Neither were any differences found in the periodontal condition related to the duration and control of diabetes, whereas diabetics with advanced retinopathy demonstrated more sextants with deep pockets. Oral hygiene instructions and scaling were required in all patients from both study groups. On an average, 1.3 sextants in 50.9% of diabetics and 0.3 sextants in 17.9% of control subjects required complex treatment.     

The community periodontal index of treatment needs (CPITN) procedure for population groups and individuals

The FDI-WHO Joint Working Group 1 on periodontal diseases supports the use of the CPITN as an epidemiological screening procedure for periodontal treatment needs in populations and also, in a modified form for screening and monitoring of individuals by dental practitioners. The advantages of the CPITN procedure have become more evident following 7 years of development and field experience. This report reviews the CPITN procedure and describes in detail the use of the method for both purposes. Methods, clinical criteria and evaluation of the CPITN data are discussed. The CPITN is primarily a screening procedure which requires clinical assessment for the presence or absence of periodontal pockets, calculus and gingival bleeding. Use of a special CPITN periodontal probe (or its equivalent) is recommended. For epidemiological purposes in adult populations, 10 specified index teeth are examined; for persons under 20 years of age only six index teeth are specified. In dental practice all teeth are examined and the highest score for each sextant noted. Only 6 scores are recorded. Measures of gingival recession, tooth mobility, intensity of inflammation, precise identification of pocket depths or differentiation between supra- and subgingival calculus are not included in the CPITN. Individuals are assigned to one of four treatment need categories determined from their CPITN scores. Detailed explanations are given for the evaluation of epidemiological data. Four tabulations provide an insight into the overall pattern of prevalence, severity and categories of treatment need. For health services planning, the data provide a basis for estimating overall population needs in terms of treatment categories and the clinical personnel required for periodontal care. In the clinical care situation the procedure offers a simple screening method for determining the level of intervention required and also a tool for the longitudinal monitoring of disease changes. Used with commonsense and an understanding of periodontal disease, the CPITN procedure provides the epidemiologist and the practitioner with a practical means of assessing periodontal treatment needs.     

Periodontal treatment needs in a population of Ljubljana, Yugoslavia

1692 citizens of Ljubljana in the age range from 15 to 65 yr participated in a survey to assess their periodontal treatment needs. Eighty-three of the participants (4.9%) were edentulous and excluded from the study. Of the 1609 dentate subjects only 2.4% were free of any signs of periodontal disease. According to the Community Periodontal Index of Treatment Needs, (CPITN), reversible gingivitis was present in 19.9% of the population, calculus and shallow pockets (4-5 mm) in 57.4%, and deep pockets (greater than or equal to 6 mm) in 20.3% of the examined participants. Bleeding on probing was the most common finding in a group of 15-yr-old subjects, calculus was most frequently found in 25- and 35-yr-old groups, and shallow and deep pockets in 45-, 55- and 65-yr-old adults. Complex treatment needs increased with age, reaching 42.9% in the 65-yr-old population. However, deep pocketing was in 60% limited to one sextant of the participants with complex treatment needs.     

Influence of CPITN partial recordings on estimates of prevalence and severity of various periodontal conditions in adults

Abstract – This study compares the results of a lull mouth examination with the results of examining only the CPITN selection of 10 index teeth 17/16, 11, 26/27, 47/46, 31 and 36/37 for estimates of prevalence and severity of the conditions assessed with the CPITN, i.e. gingival bleeding, dental calculus, pockets 4–5 mm deep and pockets 6+ mm deep. The mean number of sextants recorded with bleeding or with calculus was generally overestimated when examinations were based on the CPITN selection of index teeth, whereas the mean number of sextants with pockets, whether moderate or deep, were generally underestimated. Similarly, the prevalence of pockets, whether moderate or deep, was underestimated in virtually all age groups while the prevalence of calculus was overestimated in all age groups and the prevalence of bleeding was overestimated among persons below 30 yr of age. We conclude that the partial recording approach of the CPITN methodology is reasonably well suited for identifying persons who are relatively healthy according to the hierarchy of the CPITN parameters. There is, however, a considerable risk that persons presenting with the more severe conditions, i.e. pockets, will be overlooked if only partial recordings are performed.     

The use of the CPITN to monitor the outcome of periodontal treatment in a dental hospital setting.

The Community Periodontal Index of Treatment Need (CPITN) is recommended for monitoring the outcome of periodontal treatment, yet to date there is only one published prospective study that has used the index for that purpose. The aim of the present study was to monitor the outcome of periodontal treatment of 42 patients referred to a consultant periodontist in a dental hospital. The CPITN was recorded at baseline by a single trained examiner. Subsequently, the patients were examined independently by the consultant and a treatment plan formulated. The prescribed treatment was carried out, and a record was maintained of the type of treatment provided and the number of visits involved. The CPITN was recorded again approximately 6 months after baseline by the same trained examiner. Full data were obtained for 36 subjects; most (22 patients) had deep pockets (CPITN, code 4) at baseline, while nine had shallow pockets (CPITN, code 3). Patients with deep pockets at baseline required more complex treatment and more visits (mean 6.2 visits) than patients with shallow pockets, calculus or gingival bleeding (mean 3.5 visits). Nineteen of the 22 subjects with deep pockets at baseline showed a reduction in the number of sextants with deep pockets after 6 months; however, in only 11 of these subjects were the number of sextants with deep pockets reduced to zero. In the light of these findings a modified format for summarising such CPITN data is recommended.     

Periodontal health and care needs in a sample of the Belgian population

An epidemiological survey was carried out of among staff members of the Catholic University of Louvain. A total of 402 subjects, age 35 to 65, were examined. Periodontal lesions were estimated using the CPITN index (WHO). Only one subject presented no signs of gingival bleeding in any part of the mouth. 41.4% of the subjects presented a deep periodontal pocket in at least one sextant. Many subjects, although not presenting deep or moderately deep periodontal pockets (28.5%) needed scaling and rootplanning or other treatments to eliminate plaque retentive factors. In this sample, representing a socio-economically favoured segment of the population, we revealed a significant prevalence of periodontal disease from mild chronic gingivitis to deep pockets. Requirements in terms of care are considerable, ranging from oral hygiene instruction to control plaque to specialised care.     

Periodontal treatment needs in 12 and 15 to 19-year-old school children in the Caribbean island of Antigua, 1990

A national survey was undertaken in 1990 to investigate the periodontal treatment needs in 12 and 15 to 19-year-olds residing in urban and rural areas of Antigua. Using the CPITN procedure, examination of 246 12 year-old children and 456 adolescents (15–19 years) revealed that the CPITN scores of healthy, gingival bleeding, calculus, 4 or 5 mm and ≥6 mm periodontal pockets were distributed similarly in urban and rural areas. Calculus was the most commonly recorded score, with a prevalence of 46% in 12-year-olds and 56% in 15–19 year-olds. 4 or 5 mm pockets were found in 14% of adolescents, affecting on average less than one sextant per subject, but deep pockets were uncommon, 26% of 12-year-olds and 14% of adolescents had periodontally healthy mouths. Scaling and oral hygiene instruction were the predominant treatment needs in both age groups, but the requirement for complex periodontal care in adolescents was low – 3% only.     

Periodontal status of orthodontic patients and the relationship between dental aesthetic index and community periodontal index of treatment need

This prospective clinic-based study evaluated the pretreatment periodontal status of the orthodontic patients seen at the University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria, and assessed the relationship between dental aesthetic index (DAI) scores and periodontal status according to community periodontal index of treatment needs (CPITN) scores. One hundred forty five patients-70 (48.3%) males and 75 (51.7%) females from 6 to 45 years (mean 15.8 +/- 7.5)-were seen. World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines were followed in the examination and reporting of the periodontal status, and DAI scores were assessed based on WHO guidelines. The chi-square test was used to determine the association between the DAI and the CPITN scores. Most patients were in the 6-15 (55.9%) or 16-25 (35.9%) age groups. Based on the WHO preferred cumulative calculations of treatment need (TN), 35.2% of the patients had TN 0, 64.9% had TN 1, 24.9% had TN 2, and only 0.7% had TN 3. The relationship between DAI scores and periodontal treatment needs was not statistically significant (P >.05). Although many patients were yet to attain the WHO goal of no more than 1 sextant affected by bleeding or calculus at the age of 15, over one third had satisfactory periodontal health.     

Periodontal conditions in elderly people of Shanghai, People's Republic of China, in 1986

In a stratified multi-stage random sample, 1600 persons of 60 years and older in Shanghai, People's Republic of China, were investigated for periodontal conditions using the CPITN method. Periodontal conditions seemed to deteriorate steadily but rather slowly with increasing age. In the older age groups, there was a trend for an increased proportion of both subjects and sextants scoring CPITN code 4 (deep pockets). The increase in tooth loss with increasing age was more clearly visible: increasing percentages of edentulousness and decreasing mean numbers of teeth remaining in dentate subjects.     

Periodontal treatment needs of diabetic adults

AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate diabetes-related factors in relation to periodontal treatment needs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 299 dentate diabetics attending a diabetic clinic in Tehran, Iran. A self-administered questionnaire was administered during a dental appointment in order to gather information about year of birth, year of onset of diabetes, education and organ complications related to diabetes. Number of teeth, the Community Periodontal Index of Treatment Needs and visible plaque were recorded. RESULTS: None of the subjects had a healthy periodontium. Shallow periodontal pockets were the most prevalent finding. Periodontal pockets exceeding 5 mm and a higher number of missing teeth were associated with a low level of education. The sum of plaque scores [odds ratio (OR)=1.3; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-1.5] was related to the presence of deepened pockets when controlling for other factors. Among diabetes-related factors, the only significant association with CPITN > or =3 was by HbA1c (OR=0.7; 95% CI 0.6-0.9); for CPITN=4, no associations with the diabetes-related factors appeared. CONCLUSIONS: The poor periodontal status of our diabetic patients indicates a need to establish a comprehensive oral health promotion programme for diabetics based on collaboration between dental and general health care professionals involved in diabetic care.