Topoisomerase I inhibitors for the treatment of brain tumors

Patients with primary malignant brain tumors have a poor prognosis. Standard treatment includes surgical resection, radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Topoisomerase I inhibitors such as topotecan and irinotecan (CPT-11) represent one class of chemotherapy drugs that have been used in this disease. Recent clinical trials have shown major antitumor activity in recurrent glioblastoma when adding the antiangiogenesis drug bevacizumab with CPT-11. The combination of targeted agents to topoisomerase I inhibitors represent a novel and promising approach. This review will summarize clinical trials with topoisomerase I inhibitors and discuss new treatment strategies for primary malignant brain tumors.     

Topoisomerase I inhibitors for the treatment of brain tumors

Patients with primary malignant brain tumors have a poor prognosis. Standard treatment includes surgical resection, radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Topoisomerase I inhibitors such as topotecan and irinotecan (CPT-11) represent one class of chemotherapy drugs that have been used in this disease. Recent clinical trials have shown major antitumor activity in recurrent glioblastoma when adding the antiangiogenesis drug bevacizumab with CPT-11. The combination of targeted agents to topoisomerase I inhibitors represent a novel and promising approach. This review will summarize clinical trials with topoisomerase I inhibitors and discuss new treatment strategies for primary malignant brain tumors.     

Schedule-dependent activity of topotecan in OVCAR-3 ovarian carcinoma xenograft: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation.

Topotecan is a topoisomerase (Topo) I inhibitor used in ovarian carcinoma chemotherapy. Topo I inhibitors are thought to be more cytotoxic using protracted schedules of administration. We tested this hypothesis on a preclinical model: human ovarian carcinoma OVCAR-3 implanted i.p. Nude mice were treated i.p. with a total dose of topotecan of 12.5 mg/kg delivered in 1, 5, 10, 20, 40, or 80 daily injections. The toxicity was maximal when the total dose was delivered within 5 and 10 days of treatment. However, the efficacy was the greatest (all of the mice cured) in the 20-day schedule using 0.625 mg/kg/day, hence, making this latter schedule the most efficient without any major toxicity. A pharmacokinetic study was conducted to identify parameters related to the efficacy and toxicity of topotecan in our model. The use of a population pharmacokinetic approach allowed us to define a therapeutic window: maintaining plasma concentrations above 0.2 microM for >10 h was necessary for an optimal antitumor effect and avoiding plasma concentrations >0.7 microM allowed a manageable toxicity. Finally, Topo I activity was monitored in ascites from animals treated with different topotecan administration schedules. The optimal schedule defined above allowed for sustained inhibition of Topo I activity associated with a greater antitumor activity. These in vivo data constitute a rationale for clinical studies testing this type of administration.     

Recent advances with topotecan in the treatment of lung cancer

Topotecan is a semisynthetic derivative of camptothecin that specifically targets topoisomerase I. It has well-established antineoplastic properties and has been successfully combined with other antineoplastic agents with activity dependent on DNA disruption, such as cisplatin and etoposide. Topotecan is indicated for the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) sensitive disease after failure of first-line chemotherapy and metastatic ovarian carcinoma after failure of initial or subsequent chemotherapy. Since the approval of topotecan for the second-line treatment of SCLC, studies have been conducted in the first-line setting. Recent studies demonstrate the utility of i.v. topotecan in combination with cisplatin for untreated SCLC. Further, an oral formulation of topotecan is currently under investigation and may provide added convenience for patients. Oral topotecan has been studied in the first- and second-line settings for both SCLC and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Three recent phase III trials have demonstrated the activity of oral topotecan. In the first study of chemotherapy-na?ve patients with extensive-disease SCLC, oral topotecan plus cisplatin provided efficacy and safety similar to those of etoposide plus cisplatin. In a second study of patients with relapsed SCLC, treatment with oral topotecan showed a statistically significant and clinically meaningful longer overall survival time and improvement in dyspnea and quality of life compared with best supportive care alone in all prognostic groups. Finally, in previously treated patients with NSCLC, single-agent oral topotecan was shown to be noninferior in 1-year survival rate relative to the current standard of i.v. docetaxel. In future studies, oral topotecan will represent a good candidate for combination therapy with other i.v. or oral chemotherapy agents, monoclonal antibodies, and small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors.     

Older and new purine nucleoside analogs for patients with acute leukemias

Purine nucleoside analogs (PNAs) compose a class of cytotoxic drugs that have played an important role in the treatment of hematological neoplasms, especially lymphoid and myeloid malignancies. All PNA drugs have a chemical structure similar to adenosine or guanosine, and they have similar mechanisms of action. They have many intracellular targets: they act as antimetabolites, competing with natural nucleosides during DNA or RNA synthesis, and as inhibitors of key cell enzymes. In contrast to other antineoplastic drugs, PNAs act cytotoxically, both in the mitotic and quiescent cell cycle phases. In the last few years, three PNAs have been approved for the treatment of lymphoid malignancies and other hematological disorders: 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine (2-CdA), fludarabine and pentostatin. 2-CdA and fludarabine are also active in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). These drugs, in combination with cytarabine and other agents, are commonly used as salvage regimens in relapsed or refractory AML. Moreover, the addition of 2-CdA to the standard induction regimen is associated with an increased rate of complete remission and improved survival of adult patients with AML. More recently three novel PNAs have been synthesized and introduced into clinical trials: clofarabine, nelarabine and forodesine. Clofarabine is the most promising PNA in current clinical trials in pediatric and adult patients with acute leukemias. Nelarabine is more cytotoxic in T-lineage than in B-lineage leukemias. Clofarabine and nelarabine have been approved for the treatment of refractory patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and lymphoblastic lymphoma. Clofarabine is also an active drug in AML treatment when administered either alone or in combination regimens as front-line treatment and in relapsed or refractory patients. Unlike other PNA, forodesine is not incorporated into DNA but displays a highly selective purine nucleoside phosphorylase inhibitory action. Forodesine is undergoing clinical trials for the treatment of T-cell malignancies, including T-cell ALL. This article summarizes recent achievements in the mechanism of action, pharmacological properties and clinical activity and toxicity of PNAs, as well as their emerging role in lymphoid and myeloid acute leukemias.     

Gallium compounds as antineoplastic agents

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to provide an outline of the basic and clinical information on gallium nitrate as an antineoplastic agent. Although early clinical trials indicated that gallium nitrate had activity against lymphoma and bladder cancer, its subsequent development centered primarily on its effect on bone metabolism and not on its antineoplastic activity. As a result, the drug was approved for the treatment of hypercalcemia of malignancy. However, pharmaceutical production of gallium nitrate ceased during the late 1990s, bringing several gallium-based clinical trials to a halt. Gallium nitrate has recently become commercially available, thus reopening the door for clinical trials evaluating it as an antineoplastic agent. RECENT FINDINGS: Multicenter clinical trials have recently been conducted to reevaluate gallium nitrate for the treatment of lymphoma. An oral formulation of gallium is also in development. Gallium's mechanisms of action include its binding to transferrin, targeting to transferrin receptors on lymphoma cells, and inhibiting ribonucleotide reductase. Recent investigations show that gallium activates caspases and induces apoptosis through the mitochondrial pathway, whereas complementary DNA microarray studies suggest that changes in intracellular trafficking pathways may be important in gallium resistance. SUMMARY: Gallium nitrate has demonstrated activity against lymphoma and bladder cancer, which is likely the result of selective targeting of these malignancies. An important property of gallium nitrate is that it is not myelosuppressive and it lacks cross-resistance to other drugs. Further investigations are needed to understand better its molecular targets and to determine its clinical efficacy in combination with other drugs.     

Proteasome inhibitors in the treatment of B-cell malignancies

The proteasome, which plays a pivotal role in the control of many cell cycle-regulatory processes, has become the focus of new approaches to the treatment of cancer, including B-cell malignancies, and the first proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib (VELCADE; formerly PS-341), has entered clinical trials. The proteasome controls the stability of numerous proteins that regulate progression through the cell cycle and apoptosis, such as cyclins, cyclin-dependent kinases, tumor suppressors, and the nuclear factor-kB. By altering the stability or activity of these proteins, proteasome inhibitors sensitize malignant cells to apoptosis. Bortezomib is a dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitor that effectively and specifically inhibits proteasome activity. In preclinical studies, bortezomib and other proteasome inhibitors have shown activity against a variety of B-cell malignancies, including multiple myeloma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, and Hodgkin's lymphoma. These agents can induce apoptosis and sensitize tumor cells to radiation or chemotherapy. Based on these findings, phase I clinical trials were conducted with bortezomib in various solid and hematologic malignancies. In these studies, bortezomib was generally well tolerated with manageable toxicities. Phase II trials have been initiated for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma, refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Preliminary data from the multiple myeloma phase II study indicate that a significant number of patients responded to therapy or exhibited stable disease and that the drug had manageable toxicities. These findings, along with extensive preclinical data, suggest that bortezomib and other proteasome inhibitors may have far-reaching potential in the treatment of various cancers, including B-cell malignancies.     

New advances in lung cancer chemotherapy: topotecan and the role of topoisomerase I inhibitors

Objective tumor responses and survival rates with standard chemotherapy options for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been disappointing. However, several promising new classes of agents have emerged in recent years, including the taxanes, mitotic spindle inhibitors, antimetabolites, and topoisomerase I and II inhibitors. The molecular target of several of these new agents is topoisomerase I, an enzyme that is essential for DNA replication and is up-regulated in tumor cells. Inhibition of this enzyme by drugs such as topotecan and irinotecan leads to cell death and is the basis for their anticancer activity. The process of DNA replication is halted by the covalent binding of the drug in a topoisomerase I drug/DNA ternary reaction intermediate. The pharmacokinetics of the approved regimen--a 30-min infusion daily for 5 days at 21-day intervals--are well defined, with proportional increases in the area under the plasma concentration-time curve, peak plasma concentration, and steady state concentration following application of higher doses. The antitumor activities of both the intravenous and oral formulations of topotecan have been tested in clinical trials. Topotecan is well tolerated and has demonstrated good efficacy in patients with relapsed SCLC when administered as monotherapy or in combination regimens as first-line or second-line therapy. Preliminary trials also indicate that topotecan is well tolerated and has activity in the first-line treatment of NSCLC. In this article an overview of new agents in lung cancer chemotherapy is provided, with particular attention paid to the topoisomerase I inhibitors. A review of topotecan--the first topoisomerase I inhibitor to be approved for second-line therapy in SCLC--is presented as an illustration of the promise these new agents hold for the treatment of SCLC and NSCLC.     

Amonafide, a topoisomerase II inhibitor, is unaffected by P-glycoprotein-mediated efflux

Over-expression of P-glycoprotein (Pgp+) has been related to resistance to classical Topo II inhibitors used in the treatment of AML and is common in patients with poor-prognosis, such as those with secondary AML (sAML). Since clinical trials with amonafide, a unique ATP-independent Topo II inhibitor, in combination with cytarabine, have shown significant efficacy for remission induction in patients with sAML, we compared the cytotoxic effect of amonafide (amonafide l-malate, Xanafide) to the classical Topo II inhibitors (daunorubicin, doxorubicin, idarubicin, etoposide, and mitoxantrone) in K562 leukemia cells and in the MDR subline, K562/DOX. Pgp expression was found to be approximately 6.5-fold greater in K562/DOX and causes the rapid efflux of these drugs from the leukemia cell. As a consequence, the LC(50) values for the classical Topo II inhibitor drugs tested were each increased up to 3 log units. A similar result was also observed in murine P388 and P388/ADR leukemia cells. Addition of cyclosporin A reversed K562/DOX resistance for the classical Topo II inhibitors, decreasing their LC(50) values to the levels observed with wild type cells but had no effect on amonafide potency in Pgp+ or wild type cells. Further examination of amonafide in bidirectional Caco-2 and MDR1-MDCK models confirmed that amonafide is neither a substrate nor inhibitor of Pgp. These observations suggest that amonafide is a promising therapeutic candidate directed toward bypassing this common mechanism of drug resistance encountered in the treatment of patients with AML, and possibly in other resistant hematological malignancies as well.     

Troxacitabine

Nucleoside analogues are commonly used in the treatment of hematological malignancies and solid tumors. As antimetabolites, these drugs act by disrupting DNA synthesis and inducing apoptosis following their incorporation into DNA. Troxacitabine (Troxatyl) is the first nucleoside analogue with anticancer activity that has an unnatural stereochemical configuration. Its broad preclinical antineoplastic spectrum led to its clinical development. Summaries of the preclinical data and of the initial phase I and II clinical trials are presented.     

Treatment of high-grade glioma in children and adolescents

Pediatric high-grade gliomas (HGGs)--including glioblastoma multiforme, anaplastic astrocytoma, and diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma--are difficult to treat and are associated with an extremely poor prognosis. There are no effective chemotherapeutic regimens for the treatment of pediatric HGG, but many new treatment options are in active investigation. There are crucial molecular differences between adult and pediatric HGG such that results from adult clinical trials cannot simply be extrapolated to children. Molecular markers overexpressed in pediatric HGG include PDGFRα and P53. Amplification of EGFR is observed, but to a lesser degree than in adult HGG. Potential molecular targets and new therapies in development for pediatric HGG are described in this review. Research into bevacizumab in pediatric HGG indicates that its activity is less than that observed in adult HGG. Similarly, tipifarnib was found to have minimal activity in pediatric HGG, whereas gefitinib has shown greater effects. After promising phase I findings in children with primary CNS tumors, the integrin inhibitor cilengitide is being investigated in a phase II trial in pediatric HGG. Studies are also ongoing in pediatric HGG with 2 EGFR inhibitors: cetuximab and nimotuzumab. Other novel treatment modalities under investigation include dendritic cell-based vaccinations, boron neutron capture therapy, and telomerase inhibition. While the results of these trials are keenly awaited, the current belief is that multimodal therapy holds the greatest promise. Research efforts should be directed toward building multitherapeutic regimens that are well tolerated and that offer the greatest antitumor activity in the setting of pediatric HGG.     

Topoisomerase I inhibitors in the combined modality therapy of lung cancer

Locally advanced non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents 30%-40% of all pulmonary malignancies. Despite the fact that the disease is confined to the chest, most patients will eventually succumb to their dis-ease. Therefore, the management of NSCLC is undergoing rapid evolution with hope of improving overall survival. The arrival of a new generation of chemotherapeutic agents, including the taxanes, gemcitabine, and topoisomerase inhibitors such as irinotecan and topotecan, offers the hope of real advances against this malignancy. Irinotecan and topotecan are camptothecin derivatives that are felt to exert their cytotoxic effects by targeting topoisomerase I. It is believed that topoisomerase I inhibitors stabilize a DNA-topoisomerase I cleavable complex, and interactions between this complex and the replication machinery may lead to cell death. There is a significant volume of in vitro and in vivo data demonstrating that these topoisomerase I inhibitors also act as radiosensitizers. Early clinical data with topotecan suggests that it is a more active agent in small-cell lung cancer than it is in NSCLC despite a common mechanism of action with irinotecan. With the increasing data that exist on the improved outcome with concurrent chemoradiation treatment for malignancies including lung cancer and head and neck cancers, there is an impetus to pursue the addition of other drugs that can radiosensitize tumors and further improve local control. Irinotecan is undergoing early clinical trials in the combined modality setting in several different disease sites. This paper will review the in vitro and in vivo data on the ability of irinotecan and topotecan to render tumors more susceptible to ionizing radiation. It will then focus on the experience with both drugs and thoracic radiation in the treatment of NSCLC, in which irinotecan has yielded acceptable toxicity results and response rates in excess of 60% in early trials. It is hoped that newer treatment strategies, such as the combination of radiation and topoisomerase I inhibitors in lung cancer, will have a significant impact on cure rates in the future.     

Emerging strategies in the treatment of advanced esophageal, gastroesophageal junction, and gastric cancer: the introduction of targeted therapies

Upper gastrointestinal malignancies are major causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Despite the results of recent clinical trials with new chemotherapy strategies showing encouraging activity and efficacy, the prognosis of patients with advanced gastric, gastroesophageal junction and esophageal cancer remains poor. The demonstration in other tumor types of the effectiveness of anticancer drugs with a targeted mechanism of action, interfering with pathways involved in tumor growth and spread, has opened a new era in drug development. In patients with advanced colorectal cancer, the introduction of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors and antiangiogenic agents has resulted in a significant increase in antitumor activity and survival. These targeted agents are currently being also evaluated in other tumor types including these upper gastrointestinal malignancies. These targeted agents include, among others, EGFR inhibitors, antiangiogenic agents, cell-cycle inhibitors, apoptosis promoters, and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) inhibitors. The emerging data from the clinical development of these compounds provide novel opportunities in the treatment of these common malignancies that will probably translate into clinical benefit for patients with these diseases. This review describes the preclinical rationale and the current status of the clinical development of these compounds in patients with gastroesophageal neoplasms.     

Clinical trials with the topoisomerase I inhibitors.

Topoisomerase I represents a unique new target that can be exploited for development of new antineoplastic agents. There are now two new topoisomerase I inhibitors that are in early clinical trials that have generated a tremendous amount of interest. Topotecan (SKF 104864-A) is a topoisomerase I inhibitor that has been explored in phase I trials using a variety of dosages and schedules. The dose-limiting toxicity of the agent is neutropenia. Other toxicities include alopecia, very mild nausea and vomiting, anemia, and occasional fever. Responses have already been noted in patients with advanced, refractory ovarian cancer and non--small-cell lung cancer. The drug is currently undergoing intense phase II testing. Irinotecan (CPT-11) is also a topoisomerase I inhibitor, which has already undergone extensive phase I and early phase II clinical testing in both Japan and the United States. Dose-limiting toxicities of the agent have included neutropenia and diarrhea. Responses have been noted in patients with refractory colorectal cancer, non--small-cell lung cancer, lymphoma, ovarian cancer, head and neck cancer, pancreatic cancer, and breast cancer. There is no doubt both of these agents will be important additions to our chemotherapy armamentarium.     

Chemoradiation paradigm for the treatment of lung cancer

For the treatment of locoregional advanced stage III non-small-cell lung cancer, when chemotherapy is added sequentially to radiotherapy it acts systemically and is aimed at reducing distant metastases. Concurrent chemotherapy and radiation, however, is intended to enhance the locoregional efficacy of this modality. Combined effects of these modalities are based on their different toxicity profiles, leading to a reduced toxicity : efficacy ratio of the combination. Controlled trials investigating this additive approach indicate that concurrent application of chemotherapy and radiotherapy results in a small but significant benefit for locoregional control, which translates into a small but measurable survival benefit. This benefit is most evident when looking at 3-year or 5-year overall survival rates, when it is of clinical significance. The use of single-agent cisplatin has already demonstrated major radiosensitizing effects whereas the radiosensitizing properties of concurrent application of the single-agent carboplatin have not been observed in controlled trials. Newer drugs such as vinorelbine, the taxanes and gemcitabine might enhance this effect, although no improvement has been observed in randomized controlled trials comparing such regimens with single-agent cisplatin. New 'targeted' agents might synergize with ionizing irradiation and provide an interesting rationale concerning combined modality therapy, but this hypothesis awaits prospective clinical evidence from randomized controlled trials.     

Efficacy of topoisomerase I inhibitors,topotecan and irinotecan,administered at low dose levels in protracted schedules to mice bearing xenografts of human tumors

The efficacy of protracted schedules of therapy of the topoisomerase I inhibitors 9-dimethylaminomethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (topotecan) and 7-ethyl-10-[4-(1-piperidino)-1-piperidino]-carbonyloxycamptothecin (irinotecan; CPT-11) were evaluated against a panel of 21 human tumor xenografts derived from adult and pediatric malignancies. Tumors included eight colon adenocarcinomas, representing an intrinsically chemorefractory malignancy, six lines derived from childhood rhabdomyosarcoma (three embryonal, three alveolar) representing a chemoresponsive histiotype, sublines of rhabdomyosarcomas selected in vivo for resistance to vincristine and melphalan, and three pediatric brain tmors. All tumors were grown at the subcutaneous site. Topotecan was administered by oral gavage 5 days per week for 12 consecutive weeks. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 1.5 mg/kg per dose. Irinotecan was given by i.v. administration daily for 5 days each week for 2 weeks [(d×5)2] (one cycle of therapy), repeated every 21 days. The MTD for three cycles was 10 mg/kg per dose. Treatment was started against advanced tumors. Topotecan caused a high frequency of objective regressions in one of eight colon tumor lines, whereas irinotecan caused complete regressions (CR) of all tumors in three colon lines and a high frequency of CRs in three additional lines. Both drugs demonstrated similar activity against rhabdomyosarcoma xenografts. Topotecan caused CR of all tumors in four of six lines, and irinotecan in five of six lines evaluated. Both agents retained full activity against tumors selected for primary resistance to vincristine, but only irinotecan retained activity against a tumor selected for primary resistance to melphalan. Both agents demonstrated good activity against brain tumor xenografts with irinotecan causing CR in two of three lines and topotecan inducing CR in one of three lines. Results indicate that low-dose protracted schedules of daily administration of these topoisomerase I inhibitors is either equi-effective or more efficacious than more intense shorter schedules of administration reported previously.Supported in part by PHS awards CA32613, CA23099, CA60178, NS30245, Cancer Center Support CORE Grant CA21765, American Cancer Society grant DHR 67E, and by American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities (ALSAC).     

Recent advances in the use of radiosensitizing nucleosides

Chemotherapeutic drugs that perturb nucleotide metabolism have the potential to produce substantial sensitization of tumor cells to radiation treatment. The clinical effectiveness of fluoropyrimidines as radiosensitizers has been proven in multiple randomized trials. The development of oral fluoropyrimidine formulations may allow protracted exposure without the need for indwelling intravenous lines and infusion pumps. These agents may also provide more selective radiosensitization and are likely to be widely incorporated into chemoradiotherapy regimens for patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. Gemcitabine has been well studied in the laboratory, with respect to mechanisms of radiosensitization and strategies that may increase the therapeutic index. Clinical trials based on these studies are now defining the role of this radiosensitizing nucleoside. Issues regarding the use oral fluoropyrimidines and gemcitabine need to be viewed in the context of both local and distant disease control, given the potential systemic activity of these agents.     

New agents for intrathecal administration

Intrathecal administration of chemotherapy, with or without radiation therapy, is the primary treatment modality for the prevention and treatment of central nervous system (CNS) metastases in patients with leukemia or lymphoma. Although this treatment strategy has been very effective for patients with hematological malignancies, currently available intrathecal agents are relatively ineffective for patients with neoplastic meningitis resulting from an underlying solid or CNS tumor effective. This article provides an overview of some of the practical considerations and limitations associated with intrathecal chemotherapy, and is followed by a comprehensive review of some of the preclinical and early phase clinical trials of novel anticancer agents and treatment strategies using the intrathecal route.     

Development of IGF-IR inhibitors in pediatric sarcomas

For approximately two decades, the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) has been implicated in the pathogenesis of numerous pediatric malignancies, including osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, and rhabdomyosarcoma. In the past, major toxicities have limited the clinical development of IGF-targeted therapies. However, recent interest has been heightened by the availability of increasingly specific small molecules and antibodies directed at IGF-I receptor. Preclinical data using these inhibitors against xenograft models of pediatric sarcomas, coupled with responses in adults with Ewing sarcoma, have generated significant excitement about the clinical potential of this class of drugs and have driven the rapid development of numerous clinical trials now under way. This article reviews the preclinical data and the ongoing clinical trials, as well as issues regarding the further development of these drugs specifically for pediatric malignancies.