Cytomegalovirus infections following renal transplantation – effects of antiviral prophylaxis: a report of the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study

Post-transplant cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections are a source of significant morbidity. However, the extent of the problem and the benefits of various antiviral prophylactic therapies remain incompletely understood. The North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study registry was screened to identify patients hospitalized for CMV infections during the 1st post-renal transplant year between 1987 and 1993. Using a control group of transplant recipients, we performed a retrospective analysis of risk factors for CMV disease among these hospitalized patients and studied the effects of various viral prophylactic strategies on CMV risk, clinical manifestations, and outcome. We identified 142 patients hospitalized with CMV infections, the majority of which included major organ involvement. A CMV-positive kidney donor was the most significant risk factor for hospitalization [odds ratio (OR) = 5.2, P<0.0001] irrespective of recipient age or CMV immune status. As opposed to antiviral agents (acyclovir, ganciclovir) or pooled IgG, prophylaxis with enriched anti-CMV IgG significantly reduced the risk of CMV hospitalization (OR = 0.31, P = 0.03). The prophylactic use of antiviral agents was associated with a decreased risk of major organ involvement during the CMV infection (OR = 0.34, P<0.005). Among the patients with CMV, the 3-year graft survival was significantly better for those who received any form of prophylaxis compared with those who received none (88% vs. 52%, P<0.001). Our findings suggest a role for combined CMV-enriched IgG and antiviral agent prophylaxis for post-transplant CMV disease. Such an approach could diminish the incidence and severity of CMV infection and appears to have an independent favorable effect on graft outcome. Received November 14, 1996; received in revised form March 21, 1997; accepted April 11, 1997     

High-dose acyclovir and intravenous immune globulin reduce the incidence of CMV disease after liver transplantation

We attempted to prevent cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in liver transplant (LTx) recipients by means of a combined prophylaxis regimen consisting of high-dose acyclovir (HDA) and immune globulin (IVIG). In 259 consecutive patients, HDA was given for 3 months post-LTx; recipients seronegative for CMV also received IVIG. The previous 94 patients comprised our control group; in this group, low dose acyclovir was given to prevent herpes, and prophylaxis of CMV consisted of IVIG given only to seronegative recipients of seropositive donors. The overall incidence of CMV disease was lower in the HDA group (10.8%) than in the control group (27.6%); (P<0.001). The CMV disease rate associated with primary exposure was 26.3% in the HDA group and 83.3% in the control group (P<0.001). The incidence of CMV disease occurring after acute rejection was 9.5% in HDA patients and 24.6% in controls (P<0.005) The HDA protocol was associated with a trend toward a lower incidence of CMV in patients requiring OKT3 therapy (16.7% vs 29%). High-dose acyclovir/IVIG thus reduces the incidence of CMV disease in seronegative recipients after LTx and lowers the risk of CMV disease associated with therapy for rejection.     

Outcomes of patients with detectable CMV DNA at randomization in the phase III trial of letermovir for the prevention of CMV infection in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

Letermovir, a cytomegalovirus (CMV) terminase‐complex inhibitor, is indicated for prophylaxis of CMV infection and disease in adult CMV‐seropositive recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). In a phase III, double‐blind, randomized trial, letermovir significantly reduced the risk of clinically significant CMV infection (CS‐CMVi) vs placebo through Week 24 post‐HCT. This analysis investigated outcomes in participants with detectable CMV DNA at randomization, who were excluded from the primary efficacy analysis. In total, 70 of 565 randomized participants had detectable CMV DNA at randomization (letermovir 48; placebo 22). Study treatment completion rates were greater in letermovir‐treated participants compared with placebo (52.1% vs 9.1%). The incidence of CS‐CMVi or imputed primary endpoint events through Week 24 were 64.6% and 90.9% in the letermovir and placebo groups, respectively (treatment difference ?26.1%; P = .010). Kaplan‐Meier event rates for CS‐CMVi onset through Week 14 (end‐of‐treatment period) were 33.1% for letermovir and 86.6% for placebo (P < .001). Median viral loads at the CS‐CMVi events was similar in both treatment arms. All‐cause mortality through Week 24 posttransplant was 15.0% for letermovir and 18.2% for placebo; through Week 48, mortality rates were 26.5% and 40.9%, respectively (P = .268). Overall, clinical outcomes were similar to those reported for participants with undetectable CMV DNA at randomization.     

Hyperimmunoglobulin prophylaxis,monitoring and preemptive ganciclovir treatment eliminate the risk of CMV infection to improve patient and renal allograft survival

Abstract This study was designed to investigate whether the introduction of ganciclovir to clinical use for anti‐CMV treatment changes the risk of CMV infection in renal transplant patients. A total of 1545 cases who had received cadaveric renal transplants were divided into two groups: group 1 (n = 721) was made up of patients who received their transplants within 6 years before the introduction (1991) of ganciclovir and group 2 (n = 824), of individuals transplanted thereafter. Patient and graft survival of CMV D+/R‐ patients was uni‐ and multivariately compared with non‐CMV D+/R‐ patients. In CMV D+/R‐ patients in group 1, survival was significantly lower, and their relative risk for graft loss was 1.32‐fold (P = 0.0483) that of non‐CMV D+/R‐ patients. In group 2 patient and graft survival was identical regardless of whether the patients were at risk for CMV infection or not. The risk of CMV infection can be eliminated by hyperimmunoglobulin prophylaxis, CMV monitoring and preemptive ganciclovir treatment in renal transplant patients.     

Cytomegalovirus infection in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation

INTRODUCTION: In this open-label multicenter study, 205 simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplant recipients between 1998 and 2000 were randomly assigned to tacrolimus or cyclosporine-microemulsion (ME). All patients received concomitant rATG induction therapy, mycophenolate mofetil and short-term corticosteroids. We report the 3-year data related to the occurrence, severity and effect of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections. The type of CMV prophylaxis and treatment was at the discretion of the investigator. RESULTS: The overall incidence of CMV infection was 34% with no difference in incidence between the tacrolimus and cyclosporine-ME treatment arms. Statistically significant fewer CMV infections occurred among patients who received ganciclovir (22%) than those who did not receive prophylaxis (42%; P = .0075) or were treated with acyclovir (43%; P = .0066). The CMV infection rate according to donor recipient CMV serological status was: D-/R- group 11%, which was lower than the D-/R+ group at 40% (P = .0035), the D+/R+ group at 37% (P = .0024), or the D+/R- group at 52% (P = .00001). Among the last three groups, the infection rate was lower in patients on ganciclovir than those with no prophylaxis or on acyclovir (22% vs 64%; P = .00001). The incidence of acute rejection episodes was higher among patients without ganciclovir prophylaxis. No difference was observed in actuarial patient, kidney, or pancreas survival rates between patients with versus without infection. CONCLUSIONS: Ganciclovir prophylaxis effectively prevented CMV infection in SPK transplant recipients, especially in higher risk groups. An effect of CMV prophylaxis on the incidence of rejection is possible.     

Effect of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors on cytomegalovirus infection in kidney transplant recipients receiving polyclonal antilymphocyte globulins: a propensity score‐matching analysis

Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi) prevents cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in kidney transplant (KT) patients. From May 2010 to December 2013, all KT recipients were retrospectively analysed. Maintenance immunosuppression regimen was divided into mTORi or calcineurin inhibitors (CNI)‐based regimen. Since June 2011, CMV‐seropositive recipients (R+) treated with high‐intensity immunosuppression and mTORi did not receive anti‐CMV prophylaxis. We analysed 350 consecutive patients, of which 95 (27%) received mTORi and 255 (73%) CNI‐based immunosuppression. A Cox‐regression multivariate analysis showed that the use of mTORi‐based immunosuppression during all follow‐up reduced the risk of CMV infection (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.15–0.89, P = 0.028) and confirmed in a propensity score‐matched cohort (HR 0.4, 95% CI 0.1–0.9, P = 0.047). Early discontinuation of mTORi increased the risk of CMV infection (HR 3.2; 95% CI 1.7–6.0) in univariate analysis. The incidence of CMV infection was not higher among CMV R+ patients on mTORi and requiring high‐intensity immunosuppression when CMV prophylaxis was not given. The use of mTORi protected for CMV infection in KT patients, allowing to avoid antiviral prophylaxis for R+ patients receiving high‐intensity immunosuppression. The increased risk of CMV infection after early discontinuation of mTORi warrants further research.     

Prospective cytomegalovirus surveillance in paediatric renal transplant patients

Fifty-eight consecutive paediatric recipients of 65 renal transplants were prospectively studied for up to 72 months for evidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Blood, urine and saliva were screened for CMV pre transplant and then weekly for the first 6 weeks, and monthly thereafter, by conventional cell culture and by detection of early antigen flourescent foci. Donor CMV serostatus was available in 51 cases. All patients received triple therapy as immunosuppression and none had CMV prophylaxis. Twenty-six episodes of CMV infection (40% of transplants) and 10 of CMV disease (15%) were identified. Donor CMV seropositivity, regardless of recipient CMV serostatus, was significantly associated with CMV infection (P=0.04). First CMV excretion was significantly earlier in patients who subsequently became symptomatic than in those who did not (P=0.04), and a positive blood culture was significantly associated with CMV disease (P=0.04). We found no association between extra anti-rejection treatment or recipient's age and CMV infection or disease. CMV disease had no influence on renal function as assessed by glomerular filtration rate at 6, 12 and 24 months post transplant, nor on graft loss. CMV disease was fatal in 1 patient. We conclude that trials of CMV prohpylactic agents are indicated, particularly in recipients of CMV seropositive grafts. A positive blood culture should lead to consideration of anti-CMV therapy.     

Intravenous ganciclovir prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus in heart, heart-lung, and lung transplant recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease has had a significant clinical impact on the heart, heart-lung and lung transplant recipients in our centre. CMV disease has been so severe with CMV antibody-negative heart-lung transplant patients receiving organs from CMV antibody-positive donors (CMV-mismatched patients) that in 1986 we adopted the policy of not transplanting CMV-positive organs into CMV-negative heart-lung or lung recipients. In December 1992, we instituted a policy of providing intravenous ganciclovir (5 mg/kg twice a day for 28 days) during the immediate postoperative period for CMV-mismatched heart recipients and CMV antibody-positive heart-lung and lung patients, who have been the patients at greatest risk of severe CMV disease in our centre. A placebo group was not employed because of ethical considerations, ganciclovir having been shown to be effective for the treatment of CMV infections among transplant patients. Compared with a historical control group of patients receiving no prophylaxis, prophylactic ganciclovir reduced the incidence of CMV infection (39 % vs 91 %, P = 0.0006) and CMV disease (17 % vs 74 %, P = 0.0004) among CMV antibody-positive heart-lung recipients. Prophylactic ganciclovir did not significantly reduce the incidence of CMV infection or disease among heart or isolated lung recipients. Ganciclovir was well tolerated, with few adverse reactions. In the case of heart-lung transplant patients, one month of intravenous prophylactic ganciclovir significantly reduced the incidence of both CMV infection and disease when compared with patients who received no prophylaxis. With the lung transplant and heart transplant patients, there were no significant differences between the prophylaxis and nonprophylaxis groups, although there was a consistent trend towards less infection and disease in the prophylaxis groups. Received: 14 April 1998 Received after revision: 24 September 1998 Accepted: 18 December 1998     

Cytomegalovirus Incidence Between Everolimus Versus Mycophenolate in De Novo Renal Transplants: Pooled Analysis of Three Clinical Trials

Everolimus (EVR) in heart and renal transplant (RTx) recipients may be associated with a decreased incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV). A detailed analysis of the association between EVR versus mycophenolic acid (MPA) and CMV events has not been reported. CMV data from 2004 de novo RTx recipients from three‐randomized, prospective, EVR studies A2309 (N = 833), B201 (N = 588) and B251 (N = 583) were retrospectively analyzed to identify differences between two EVR dosing groups and MPA. EVR groups received 1.5 mg/day, or 3 mg/day with either standard (SD‐CsA) or reduced dose cyclosporine (RD‐CsA). Controls received MPA with SD‐CsA. CMV prophylaxis was as per center practice. CMV incidence (infection/syndrome, disease, viremia) was captured per local center evaluations. Kaplan–Meier analyses demonstrated that freedom from CMV viremia and infection/syndrome was significantly greater for EVR versus MPA for recipients without CMV prophylaxis. Among recipients who received prophylaxis, freedom from viremia was greater for EVR 3.0 mg; freedom from infection/syndrome was greater for EVR 3.0 and 1.5 mg. Although freedom from organ involvement was numerically greater for EVR, it was not statistically significant. This analysis documents significant reductions in the incidence of CMV infection/syndrome and viremia in EVR‐treated de novo RTx recipients, especially those who did not receive CMV prophylaxis versus MPA.     

Low-dose valaciclovir prophylaxis against cytomegalovirus disease in renal transplant recipients

High-dose valaciclovir at up to 8 g/day has been shown to be effective in prophylaxis against cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in renal transplant recipients. We report our experience with low-dose valaciclovir prophylaxis of up to 3 g/day, adjusted to creatinine clearance. A group of patients at high risk of developing CMV disease who received prophylaxis were selected as the study group. This included all CMV-positive patients who received antilymphocyte therapy (R+, n=20) and all CMV-negative recipients of CMV-positive organs (D+R–, n=15). D+R– patients receiving antilymphocyte therapy were excluded, as most of the patients in the control group had received ganciclovir prophylaxis. A historical control group was used, which consisted of patients who did not receive prophylaxis. Low-dose valaciclovir prophylaxis resulted in a statistically significant decrease (8.5 vs 37%, P=0.004) in CMV disease in the study group at 6 months. On subgroup analysis the decrease was statistically significant only in the R+ group (5 vs 45%, P=0.003), not in the D+R– group (13.3 vs 26.6%, P=0.651). Low-dose valaciclovir prophylaxis seems to be adequate for R+ patients receiving antilymphocyte therapy. The role of low-dose valaciclovir prophylaxis needs to be assessed further in a prospective trial.     

Ganciclovir prophylaxis delays but does not prevent cytomegalovirus infection in renal transplant recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is associated with reduced graft and patient survival among renal transplant recipients. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of routine prophylaxis with 12 weeks of oral ganciclovir on the incidence of CMV infection in a center that predominantly uses antibody induction together with tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil-based maintenance immunosuppressive therapy. The control group consisted of a historical patient cohort transplanted immediately prior to the use of oral ganciclovir prophylaxis. The use of tacrolimus (88% vs 77%, P=.02) and cytolytic therapy (81% vs 46%, P <.0001) was likewise greater among patients who received ganciclovir prophylaxis. CMV infection occurred in 20 (9%) patients in the ganciclovir era and 4 (3%) patients in the preganciclovir era (P=.003). The mean time to CMV infection was longer in patients who received ganciclovir prophylaxis than in patients in the preganciclovir era (23.4 +/- 10.9 weeks vs 9.8 +/- 5.6 weeks, P=.03). We conclude that 12 weeks of ganciclovir prophylaxis delays but does not prevent CMV infection from occurring in renal transplant recipients. These results suggest that with the use of 12 weeks of ganciclovir prophylaxis, vigilance for CMV infection is needed well beyond 24 weeks posttransplant.     

Cytomegalovirus infection in kidney transplant recipients: Evolution of approach through three eras

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis is recommended for high-risk patients, while preemptive therapy is considered acceptable for patients at moderate/low risk. After reviewing kidney transplant patients from 1992-1995 and 1996-1999, we decided to replace prophylaxis by preemptive therapy. Herein we have presented our data. From 1996-1999 we treated 129 patients with ganciclovir prophylaxis for 3 months if D+/R- or if they received depleting antibodies. The incidence of CMV was 13.2% versus 3.7% in the 1992-1995 cohort. The increase was associated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) use (P = .002). Forty-two percent of the D+/R- developed an infection with 89% of bouts occurring in the first month after cessation of prophylaxis. From 2002-2004, we never gave prophylaxis to 129 patients except when they received thymoglobulin. High-risk D+/R- patients were monitored by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) CMV for 3 months. The incidence of CMV was 17.1% with 54% of the D+/R- developing CMV. CMV infection occurred mostly during the first trimester posttransplantation. Creatinine at 1 year posttransplantation was worse in the presence of CMV infection (154.3 mumol/L-1.75 mg % versus 130.2 mumol/L-1.47 mg %, P = .03). Time to cure CMV infection was longer when MMF was discontinued: 36.7 days versus 69.9 days (P = .026). Our results indicated that CMV incidence is increasing: 3.7% (1992-1995) --> 13.2% (1996-1999) -->17.1% (2002-2004) and that it impairs 1 year graft function. Recovery was faster among patients still receiving MMF compared with those discontinuing MMF. Although MMF inhibits synthesis of anti-CMV IgM, it increases the anti-herpes virus effect of ganciclovir and may protect against chronic allograft nephropathy. Based on our experience, we plan to reintroduce prophylaxis in high-risk patients and to continue MMF when treating CMV infection.     

Risk factors for cytomegalovirus infection and disease in renal transplant recipients: HLA-DR7 and triple therapy

In a prospective study, an analysis of risk factors for the development of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease was performed on 77 renal allograft recipients. Twenty-five out of the 77 recipients (32%) had a CMV infection. Twenty-two of the recipients received triple immunosuppressive therapy (cyclosporin A, prednisolone, and azathioprine) while the remaining 55 received standard therapy (cyclosporin A and prednisolone). In 23 recipients (30%) acute rejection was diagnosed and the first positive parameter of infection occurred 22 days after rejection therapy. Infection occurred in 10 out of 18 HLA-DR7-positive recipients (56%) and in 15 out of 59 HLA-DR7-negative recipients (25%; P< 0.02). In multiple regression analysis, HLA-DR7 was found to be a significant predictor of CMV infection (P< 0.005). CMV disease was diagnosed in only 9 out of 25 recipients with an acute infection. Six recipients (67%) with CMV disease received triple therapy for maintenance immuuosuppression; this was significantly correlated to CMV disease (P< 0.05) as compared to three recipients (33%) with CMV disease maintained with standard therapy. Our data suggest that HLA-DR7-positive recipients are more susceptible to CMV infection and that CMV disease is associated with triple immunosuppressive therapy.     

The economic impact of cytomegalovirus infection after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: We studied the economic impact of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease and its effective reduction with antiviral prophylaxis in liver transplant recipients. METHOD: Analysis of institutional charge data accumulated during a prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing oral acyclovir 800 mg four times daily for 120 days (ACV) and intravenous ganciclovir 5 mg/kg every 12 h for 14 days followed by ACV for 106 days (GCV) was performed. RESULTS: Liver transplant recipients who developed CMV disease had significantly higher charges (median: $148,300) than those who developed asymptomatic CMV infection ($119,600) or experienced no CMV infection ($114,100) (P<0.01). A multiple linear regression analysis indicated that CMV disease is associated with a 49% increase in charges, independent of other factors influencing increased hospitalization charges. In CMV-seronegative patients who received a CMV-seropositive donor organ, GCV prophylaxis was associated with a significant reduction in charges, as compared to ACV prophylaxis ($113,900 vs. $153,300, respectively; P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: CMV disease is an independent risk factor for increased resource utilization associated with liver transplantation. The use of an effective prophylactic antiviral regimen provides savings in health care resources, particularly in patients at high risk for developing CMV disease.     

Historical comparison of prophylactic ganciclovir for gastrointestinal cytomegalovirus infection in kidney transplant recipients

Background

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) can cause morbidity in kidney transplant recipients. The gastrointestinal (GI) tract is a major target for CMV disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefit of ganciclovir prophylaxis on GI CMV infection in intermediate-risk CMV seropositive transplant recipients.

Methods

Since January 2009, intravenous ganciclovir (5 mg/kg, twice daily) was administered for 14 days after kidney transplantation in 41 patients. The historical control group consisted of 45 patients who received kidney transplantations between January 2007 and December 2008. To evaluate the effects of prophylaxis on GI CMV infection, we performed routine endoscopic examinations with mucosal biopsies at the time of transplantation as well as 1, 3, and 6 months thereafter.

Results

The average age of the 86 studied patients was 43.7 ± 10.6 years (range = 14-63) and the male-to-female ratio 1:1.3. Forty-three (50%) patients underwent deceased donor transplantations and 84 (97.7%) patients were CMV seropositive at that time. The incidence of GI CMV infection was significantly lower among the prophylaxis than the historical control group (24.4% vs 48.9%, P = .026). Patient age, numbers of deceased donors, and tacrolimus trough levels at 1 and 3 months posttransplant were significantly lower in the prophylaxis than the historical control group. Logistic regression analysis revealed ganciclovir prophylaxis to be the only significant risk factor for GI CMV infection.

Conclusion

Prophylactic treatment with ganciclovir decreased the incidence GI CMV infection among seropositive kidney transplant recipients.     

Viral load,CMV‐specific T‐cell immune response and cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients at higher risk for cytomegalovirus infection during preemptive therapy

Despite advances in prevention, cytomegalovirus (CMV) recurrence is an important challenge in high‐risk organ recipients. The present study prospectively evaluates the impact of CMV‐specific T‐cell immune response and secondary prophylaxis on the risk of recurrence in a cohort of CMV high‐risk organ recipients and whether it is possible to determine a safe standardized viral load value below which CMV disease is unlikely. Thirty‐nine recipients were included. Thirty‐six had primary infections, and 88.9% recurred. Rate and duration of recurrent CMV infection was similar in patients with and without secondary prophylaxis: 57.9% vs. 53.6%, P = 0.770 and 16 vs. 15 days, P = 0.786, respectively. The only factor independently associated with no episodes of CMV recurrence was the acquisition of CMV‐specific T‐cell immune response (OR: 0.151, 95% CI: 0.028–0.815; P = 0.028). Cytomegalovirus diseases (N = 5) occurred in patients with CMV viral load above 1500 IU/ml who did not follow the planned monitorization schedule. Our observations suggest that episodes of recurrent CMV infection are common after preemptive therapy despite secondary prophylaxis and that CMV‐specific T‐cell immune response is associated with a decreased risk of recurrent infections. Preemptive therapy may be safe in patients at high risk for CMV infection with strict close monitoring of the CMV viral load.     

A prospective longitudinal analysis of cytomegalovirus (CMV)‐specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in kidney allograft recipients at risk of CMV infection

Cytomegalovirus (CMV)‐specific cellular immunity is essential in controlling CMV infection after transplantation. We investigated whether CMV‐specific T cell levels predict CMV DNAemia after kidney transplantation. Using cytokine‐flow cytometry, we enumerated interferon‐γ producing CMV‐specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells at serial time points among CMV‐mismatched (D+/R?) and seropositive (R+) kidney recipients who received 3 months of valganciclovir prophylaxis. Among 44 patients, eight (18%) developed CMV DNAemia at a mean (±SD) time of 151 (±33) days after transplantation, including two (5%) with CMV syndrome and three (7%) with tissue‐invasive CMV disease. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that CMV mismatch (D+/R?) status (HR: 13, 95% CI: 1.6–106.4; P = 0.02) and diabetes mellitus (HR: 5.6; 95%CI: 1.1–27.9; P = 0.03) were significantly associated with CMV DNAemia. In contrast, the percentage or change‐over‐time in CMV‐specific CD4+ [pp65 (P = 0.45), or CMV lysate (P = 0.22)] and CD8+ [pp65 (P = 0.43), or IE‐1 (P = 0.37)] T cells were not significantly associated with CMV DNAemia. CMV‐specific T cell assays have limited clinical utility among CMV R+ kidney recipients who received valganciclovir prophylaxis. On the other hand, the clinical utility of CMV‐specific T cell assays will need to be assessed in a larger cohort of CMV D+/R? kidney recipients who remain at high‐risk of delayed‐onset CMV disease.     

Cytomegalovirus prevention strategies and the risk of BK polyomavirus viremia and nephropathy

Polyomavirus BK (BKV) is the cause of polyomavirus‐associated nephropathy resulting in premature graft loss. There are limited data regarding the role of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and its prevention in developing BKV viremia and PVAN. In a prospective study, we analyzed 207 consecutive renal transplant recipients previously enrolled in 2 randomized trials evaluating different CMV prevention regimens with routine screening for BKV and CMV. Of these, 59 received valganciclovir and 100 valacyclovir prophylaxis; 48 patients were managed by preemptive therapy. At 3 years, the incidence of BKV viremia and PVAN was 28% and 5%, respectively. CMV DNAemia developed in 55% and CMV disease in 6%. Both BKV viremia (42% vs 23% vs 21%, P = .006) and PVAN (12% vs 2% vs 2%, P = .011) were increased in patients treated with valganciclovir prophylaxis compared to valacyclovir and preemptive therapy. Using multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression, valganciclovir prophylaxis was independent predictor of BKV viremia (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.38, P = .002) and PVAN (HR = 4.73, P = .026). In contrast, the risk of subsequent BKV viremia was lower in patients with antecedent CMV DNAemia (HR = 0.50, P = .018). These data suggest valganciclovir prophylaxis may be associated with increased risk of BKV viremia and PVAN. CMV DNAemia did not represent a risk for BKV.     

Circulatory follicular helper T lymphocytes associate with lower incidence of CMV infection in kidney transplant recipients

Primary infection and/or reactivation of cytomegalovirus (CMV) in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) favor rejection and mortality. T follicular helper cells (TFH) could contribute to protection against CMV. Circulatory TFH (cTFH) were studied pretransplant and early posttransplant in 90 CMV seropositive KTR not receiving antithymocyte globulin or antiviral prophylaxis, followed-up for 1 year. Patients who presented CMV infection had significantly lower cTFH and activated cTFH pretransplant and early posttransplant. Pretransplant activated cTFH were also lower within patients who developed CMV disease. Pre- and 14 days posttransplant activated cTFH were an independent protective factor for CMV infection (HR 0.41, p = .01; and 0.52, p = .02, respectively). KTR with low cTFH 7 days posttransplant (<11.9%) had lower CMV infection-free survival than patients with high cTFH (28.2% vs. 67.6%, p = .002). cTFH were associated with CMV-specific neutralizing antibodies (Nabs). In addition, IL-21 increased interferon-γ secretion by CMV-specific CD8⁺ T cells in healthy controls. Thus, we show an association between cTFH and lower incidence of CMV infection, probably through their cooperation in CMV-specific Nab production and IL-21-mediated enhancement of CD8⁺ T cell activity. Moreover, monitoring cTFH pre- and early posttransplant could improve CMV risk stratification and help select KTR catalogued at low/intermediate risk who could benefit from prophylaxis.     

Utility of Oral Valganciclovir for Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis: Does It Improve Treatment Compliance?

Introduction

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among heart transplant (HT) patients. Various prophylactic and preemptive treatment regimens have been used for its prevention. We sought to assess the impact of oral valganciclovir on CMV prophylaxis in HT patients.

Patients and Methods

A retrospective analysis of 536 consecutive HT patients at our institution allowed selection of subjects eligible for prophylaxis based on CMV serology (donor positive/recipient negative). Treatment compliance, rates of preemptive therapy and treatment for CMV disease were assessed according to prophylactic drug use. If the indication was present, treatment was considered to have been performed.

Results

Among 536 patients, 9.8% (n = 53) were eligible for prophylaxis. Seventeen patients (33%) received valganciclovir, with a compliance rate of 94.1%. The remaining 68% received prophylaxis mainly with IV. ganciclovir (5 mg/kg) during their hospital stay followed by oral ganciclovir, with a compliance rate of 57.1% (P = .01). No differences were observed when we analyzed the need for preemptive therapy (0 vs 7%; P = .28) or for treatment of systemic or organ-specific infection (6.3 vs 0%; 6.3 vs 14%, respectively; P = .8).

Conclusion

Oral valganciclovir facilitated treatment compliance in prophylaxis for CMV without being inferior to other prophylactic therapies.