A Paradigm Shift in Health Care

No abstract available for this article.     

Resilience and Professional Chaplaincy: A Paradigm Shift in Focus

Research into the area of resilience provides a challenge and a great opportunity for professional chaplaincy. In this article, we will consider the challenge that the research primarily of George Bonanno of Columbia University offers to the traditional, clinical perspectives and assessments of professional chaplains serving in health care. Secondly, we will propose the practical implications for a wider paradigm and an expanded focus on intentionality and interventions of chaplains. Resilience is seen as a positive response possibility for those facing potentially traumatic events. It is understood to be a predominant response to traumatic events more often than the grief recovery model usually presumed to be active. Resilience has heuristic value and merits being factored in to professional chaplaincy as it relates to patient assessment, interventions, interdisciplinary care, staff and corporate support, and transcultural usefulness.     

Health Literacy: A Pathway to Better Oral Health

Objectives. We examined whether health literacy was associated with self-rated oral health status and whether the relationship was mediated by patient–dentist communication and dental care patterns.Methods. We tested a path model with data collected from 2 waves of telephone surveys (baseline, 2009–2010; follow-up, 2011) of individuals residing in 36 rural census tracts in northern Florida (final sample size n = 1799).Results. Higher levels of health literacy were associated with better self-rated oral health status (B = 0.091; P < .001). In addition, higher levels of health literacy were associated with better patient–dentist communication, which in turn corresponded with patterns of regular dental care and better self-rated oral health (B = 0.003; P = .01).Conclusions. Our study showed that, beyond the often-reported effects of gender, race, education, financial status, and access to dental care, it is also important to consider the influence of health literacy and quality of patient–dentist communication on oral health status. Improved patient–dentist communication is needed as an initial step in improving the population’s oral health.Oral health status is inexorably linked with general health,1 as evidenced by the association between poor oral health and chronic diseases, such as diabetes,2 cardiovascular disease,3 and respiratory disease.4 Among US adults, the burden of oral disease falls heaviest on vulnerable population groups,5–7 particularly those living in rural areas.8 Although improving oral health is named as one of the top 5 health priorities in Rural Healthy People 2010,9 little progress has been made in establishing public health programs to address this priority area. To achieve the goal of improved oral health, it is essential to study the risk factors associated with the oral health status of individuals residing in rural areas and to understand the relationships among these risk factors.The association between low dental care utilization and poor oral health outcomes has been proposed as a partial explanation for urban–rural disparities in oral health status.10–13 The rate of dental care utilization is lower among US rural than general populations, and dental visits tend to be problem—rather than prevention—oriented.14–17 Low levels of financial security and a lack of dental providers in rural areas are cited as major reasons for the low utilization rates in rural populations.12,18,19 However, evidence that individuals with dental insurance benefits choose to forgo regular preventive dental care suggests the presence of additional determinants in dental care utilization.20Previous research showed that communication between dentists and their patients plays an important role in the use of dental services.21–24 Effective patient–dentist communication increases utilization of dental services by lessening dental anxiety and, as a result, increasing patient perceptions of provider competence.25 Conversely, deficient communication skills, on either side of the patient–provider equation, are likely to increase dental anxiety and overall dissatisfaction with care.Health literacy deficits can interfere with effective patient–dentist communication. Individuals with low health literacy skills often have difficulty describing dental problems to their dentist and understanding dental conditions described by the dentist.26 Rozier et al. surveyed about 2000 dentists in the United States regarding the use of the 5 domains of communication techniques: interpersonal communication, teach-back method, patient-friendly materials and aids, assistance, and patient-friendly practice.27 Findings revealed low routine use by dentists of each communication technique, including those thought to be most effective with patients who demonstrate low health literacy.The association between low health literacy and poor health outcomes is well established.28–30 However, in the context of oral health, the literature offers few studies identifying the relationship between health literacy and oral health outcomes. It has been suggested that those with low health literacy are at highest risk for oral diseases and problems31 and that low health literacy may be associated with barriers to accessing care and with oral health behaviors such as seeking preventive care.32 Furthermore, rural residents have lower health literacy skills than urban residents.33 However, how health literacy is related to oral health status among rural populations remains an unanswered question.Frequently acknowledged risk factors for poor oral health include gender (male), race (Black), educational attainment (low), financial status (low), and access to dental care (none). We controlled for these factors in an examination of the effects of health literacy, patient–dentist communication, and dental care patterns on self-rated oral health status. In addition, we tested mediational pathways between health literacy and self-rated oral health. We hypothesized that greater health literacy would be associated with better patient–dentist communication, and in turn, that better patient–dentist communication would be associated with an increased likelihood of seeking regular dental care, ultimately leading to better self-rated oral health.     

Paradigm Shifts in Disability and Health: Toward More Ethical Public Health Research

Disability is often considered a health outcome disproportionately experienced by minority groups. It is also possible to view people with disabilities as a minority group that itself experiences health disparities.Calls to reduce these disparities necessitate the inclusion of people with developmental disabilities in research, although resulting ethical issues can thwart scientific progress. Using disability rights principles can help address ethical challenges and promote safe, respectful public health research. Examples include applying human rights frameworks, providing accommodations, attending to power, countering legacies of deficits-based models of disability, and transforming access to science more broadly.Collectively, these strategies can encourage broader engagement in safe, respectful, inclusive public health research aimed at promoting the health and well-being of people with developmental disabilities.Disability is Often Considered a health outcome that minority groups disproportionately experience; for example, African Americans and Native Americans are at greater risk for fetal alcohol syndrome, which can result in developmental disability.1–3 However, disability and health are not mutually exclusive. It is possible to view people with developmental disabilities as a minority group that itself experiences health disparities. Like other minorities, people with developmental disabilities experience marginalization and decreased expectations and opportunities. This results in inequalities in relationships, education, community access, health and health care, quality of life, and civic, economic, and political participation.4 These social conditions and their consequences as social determinants of health are similar to those that other marginalized groups experience.5Developmental disabilities involve lifelong impairment in physical, learning, language, or behavioral conditions that begin before the age of 22 years and that affect functioning (e.g., intellectual disability, cerebral palsy, autism spectrum disorder, spina bifida, hearing loss). Almost 14% of children and 5 to 6 million people of all ages in the United States have a developmental disability.6–8 Among children, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and learning disabilities may be especially prevalent; what is known about adults is largely restricted to those with intellectual disability.8,9Like other minorities, individuals with developmental disabilities experience substantial preventable health disparities. These disparities cast a wide net, covering preventable injuries, vulnerability in emergencies, health behaviors, health care experiences, health outcomes, and health service and health promotion program accessibility.5,10 For example, only about 50% of adults with developmental disabilities exercise compared with 75% of the general population11; people with developmental disabilities experience increased rates of obesity11,12; and autistic adults have about twice the odds of experiencing unmet health care needs and using the emergency department.13 As with reducing health disparities among other minorities, understanding the origins of these disparities and addressing them requires attention to the lived experience of developmental disability.     

Rural Health Research: Rural Hospitals and the Local Economy: A Needed Extension and Refinement of Existing Empirical Research

The relationship between the health care sector and the rural economy is of increasing importance. Much additional research is needed to fully understand this relationship and to address some of the limitations of the modest amount of research that already exists. In this study, data from Nebraska were used to create a four-part typology of rural hospitals. Input-output analysis was used to assess the economic effects of each type of hospital on the local economy and to simulate the effects of three different changes or scenarios: an increase or decrease in hospital utilization; the elimination of local purchases of nonlabor inputs; and a change in the mix or configuration of services provided. While the hospital is an important contributor to local economies, this contribution is not constant across hospital types. The total job-related effects ranged from 77 jobs for the smallest type of rural hospital to 1,332 for the largest type. Service and trade (retail plus wholesale) are the two sectors of the local economy most heavily influenced by the presence of a hospital. In today's changing and challenging environment, there is a great need for researchers to create and evaluate the economic effects of a variety of relevant and realistic scenarios (other than hospital closure).     

Advancing Health Literacy Measurement: A Pathway to Better Health and Health System Performance

The concept of health literacy initially emerged and continues to gain strength as an approach to improving health status and the performance of health systems. Numerous studies clearly link low levels of education, literacy, and health literacy with poor health, poor health care utilization, increased barriers to care, and early death. However, theoretical understandings and methods of measuring the complex social construct of health literacy have experienced a continual evolution that remains incomplete. As a result, the seemingly most-cited definition of health literacy proposed in the now-decade-old Institute of Medicine report on health literacy is long overdue for updating. Such an effort should engage a broad and diverse set of health literacy researchers, practitioners, and members of the public in creating a definition that can earn broad consensus through validation testing in a rigorous scientific approach. That effort also could produce the basis for a new universally applicable measure of health literacy. Funders, health systems, and policymakers should reconsider their timid approach to health literacy. Although the field and corresponding evidence base are not perfect, health literacy—especially when combined with a focus on prevention and integrative health—is one of the most promising approaches to advancing public health.     

A Paradigm Shift in Regulating and Running Nursing Homes in Singapore

Singapore faces a rapidly aging population. By 2030, 19% of her population will be aged 65 years and above. Other Asian countries face similar problems, with South Korea having the fastest aging population worldwide, followed by China and Thailand. With Singapore possessing an advanced aging population, its policy provides a useful case study of eldercare to cater to evolving population demographics. This article will focus specifically on nursing homes and analyze current policies toward them, synthesize recommendations to improve long-term care, and justify a paradigm shift toward more holistic, humanistic, and multidimensional care.     

健康素质与健康素养

依靠广泛的社会参与、多部门的合作和支持,从卫生、文化、社会各方面提高对健康促进的重视程度,最终达到提高国民健康素养,进而提高全民族健康素质的目标。1健康素质1·1健康素质的定义素质的定义迄今仍属于一个颇具争议的理论问题,研究者从语义学、哲学、社会学、心理学、教育     

Health Literacy Practices and Educational Competencies for Health Professionals: A Consensus Study

Health care professionals often lack adequate knowledge about health literacy and the skills needed to address low health literacy among patients and their caregivers. Many promising practices for mitigating the effects of low health literacy are not used consistently. Improving health literacy training for health care professionals has received increasing emphasis in recent years. The development and evaluation of curricula for health professionals has been limited by the lack of agreed-upon educational competencies in this area. This study aimed to identify a set of health literacy educational competencies and target behaviors, or practices, relevant to the training of all health care professionals. The authors conducted a thorough literature review to identify a comprehensive list of potential health literacy competencies and practices, which they categorized into 1 or more educational domains (i.e., knowledge, skills, attitudes) or a practice domain. The authors stated each item in operationalized language following Bloom's Taxonomy. The authors then used a modified Delphi method to identify consensus among a group of 23 health professions education experts representing 11 fields in the health professions. Participants rated their level of agreement as to whether a competency or practice was both appropriate and important for all health professions students. A predetermined threshold of 70% agreement was used to define consensus. After 4 rounds of ratings and modifications, consensus agreement was reached on 62 out of 64 potential educational competencies (24 knowledge items, 27 skill items, and 11 attitude items), and 32 out of 33 potential practices. This study is the first known attempt to develop consensus on a list of health literacy practices and to translate recommended health literacy practices into an agreed-upon set of measurable educational competencies for health professionals. Further work is needed to prioritize the competencies and practices in terms of relative importance.     

A Cardiovascular Health Intervention for Spanish Speakers: The Health Literacy and ESL Curriculum

Spanish speakers in the United States are in need of effective interventions that address both cardiovascular disease (CVD) and health literacy. However, the literature lacks interventions that have used and evaluated a strategies that focus on both, particularly at the community level. The aim of this study was to explore the effect of a health literacy curriculum on cardiovascular health behavior among Spanish speaking adults. It used a randomized controlled pre-posttest design. Participants included Hispanic adults with a low-to-intermediate level of English proficiency. The intervention group received the health literacy and English as a second language (ESL) Curriculum with CVD specific content, while the control group received a conventional ESL curriculum. Tools included the Spanish Cardiovascular Health Questionnaire (CSC), the test of functional health literacy in adults (TOFHLA), and the Combined English Language Skills Assessment. Analysis of change scores included independent sample t test and multiple linear regression. A total of 155 participants completed the study. There was a significant greater improvement for the intervention group in change of CSC score from pretest to posttest (P?=?0.049) compared to controls. The study also found significantly improved TOFHLA (P?=?0.011), however it did not find a relationship between changes in CVD behavior and health literacy or English proficiency. The Health Literacy and ESL Curriculum constitutes a valuable resource for addressing the cardiovascular health, literacy, and language needs of Spanish-speaking adults. Interventions that take a multilevel education and health approach may be more effective in addressing the needs of immigrants. Research should further explore the interactions between CVD behavior, health literacy, and English proficiency.