Screening Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer in Asymptomatic People: A Meta-Analysis

Objective The preferred method for screening asymptomatic people for colorectal cancer (CRC) is colonoscopy, according to the new American guidelines. The aim of our study was to perform a meta-analysis of the prospective cohorts using total colonoscopy for screening this population for CRC. We looked for the diagnostic yield of the procedure as well as for its safety in a screening setting. Methods We included papers with more than 500 participants and only those reporting diagnostic yield of adenoma (and/or advanced adenoma) and CRC. Nested analysis were performed for secondary endpoints of complications and CRC stages when this information was available. All analyses were performed with StatDirect Statistical software, version 2.6.1 (). Results Our search yielded ten studies of screening colonoscopy conducted in asymptomatic people that met our inclusion criteria, with a total of 68,324 participants. Colonoscopy was complete and reached the cecum in 97% of the procedures. Colorectal cancer was found in 0.78% of the participants (95% confidence interval 0.13–2.97%). Stage I or II were found in 77% of the patients with CRC. Advanced adenoma was found in 5% of the cases (95% confidence interval 4–6%). Complications were rare and described in five cohorts. Perforation developed in 0.01% of the cases (95% confidence interval 0.006–0.02%) and bleeding in 0.05% (95% confidence interval 0.02–0.09%). Conclusions Our findings support the notion that colonoscopy is feasible and a suitable method for screening for CRC in asymptomatic people.     

Appropriateness of indication and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy： First report based on the 2000 guidelines of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

AIM: To assess the appropriateness of referrals and to determine the diagnostic yield of colonoscopy according to the 2000 guidelines of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE). METHODS: A total of 736 consecutive patients (415 males, 321 females; mean age 43.6±16.6 years) undergoing colonoscopy during October 2001-March 2002 were prospectively enrolled in the study. The 2000 ASGE guidelines were used to assess the appropriateness of the indications for the procedure. Diagnostic yield was defined as the ratio between significant findings detected on colonoscopy and the total number of procedures performed for that indication. RESULTS: The large majority (64%) of patients had colonoscopy for an indication that was considered "generally indicated", it was "generally not indicated" for 20%, and it was "not listed" for 16% in the guidelines. The diagnostic yield of colonoscopy was highest for the "generally indicated" (38%) followed by "not listed" (13%) and "generally not indicated" (5%) categories. In the multivariable analysis, the diagnostic yield was independently associated with the appropriateness of indication that was "generally indicated" (odds ratio=12.3) and referrals by gastroenterologist (odds ratio =1.9). CONCLUSION: There is a high likelihood of inappropriate referrals for colonoscopy in an open-access endoscopy system. The diagnostic yield of the procedure is dependent on the appropriateness of indication and referring physician's specialty. Certain indications "not listed" in the guidelines have an intermediate diagnostic yield and further studies are required to evaluate whether they should be included in future revisions of the ASGE guidelines.     

Appropriateness of outpatient gastrointestinal endoscopy in a non-academic hospital

AIM:To assess the appropriate use and the diagnostic yield of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and colonoscopy in this subgroup of patients.METHODS:In total,789 consecutive outpatients referred for gastrointestinal(GI) endoscopy [381 for esophagogastroduodenoscopy(EGD) and 408 for colonoscopy] were prospectively enrolled in the study.The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy(ASGE) guidelines were used to assess the relationship between appropriateness and the presence of relevant endoscopic f indings.RESULTS:The overall inappropriate rate was 13.3%.The indications for EGD and colonoscopy were,respectively,appropriate in 82.7% and 82.6% of the exams,uncertain in 5.8% and 2.4% and inappropriate in 11.5% and 15%.The diagnostic yield was signif icant higher forEGDs and colonoscopies judged appropriate and uncertain when compared with those considered inappropriate(EGD:36.6% vs 36.4% vs 11.4%,P = 0.004;Colonoscopy:24.3% vs 20.0% vs 3.3%,P = 0.001).Of the 25 malignant lesions detected,all but one was detected in exams judged appropriate or uncertain.CONCLUSION:This study shows a good adherence to ASGE guidelines by the referring physicians and a significant increase of the diagnostic yield in appropriate examinations,namely in detecting neoplastic lesions.It underscores the importance that the appropriateness of the indication assumes in assuring high-quality GI endoscopic procedures.     

Screening for Colorectal Cancer in Average-Risk Chinese Population Using a Mixed Strategy with Sigmoidoscopy and Colonoscopy

Purpose The Chinese population has been shown to have more distal colonic neoplasm and a higher sensitivity of sigmoidoscopic screening strategy for detecting advanced neoplasm compared with Western populations. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of the mixed screening strategy with sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy in the average-risk Chinese population. Methods Consecutive average-risk adults aged ≥50 years who underwent colonoscopy as part of a health checkup were enrolled. Data were analyzed in a hypothetical graded screening strategy using colonoscopy on patients older than a certain cutoff age or those with distal sentinel polyps. The sensitivity in detecting advanced colonic neoplasm and advanced proximal neoplasm as well as the number of colonoscopies reduced were assessed. Results Of the 2,106 persons eligible for analysis, 1,193 (56.6 percent) were males and 913 (43.4 percent) were females. If the cutoff ages were 55, 60, and 65 years, and adenoma detected in the distal colon was the indication for subsequent colonoscopy, the detection rate for 1) advanced colonic neoplasm in the entire colon would be 94, 93.1, and 83.6 percent, respectively, and 2) advanced proximal neoplasm would be 84.8, 82.6, and 58.7 percent, respectively. The number of colonoscopic procedures could be reduced by 28, 48, and 65 percent if the cutoff ages were 55, 60, and 65 years, respectively. Conclusions The mixed screening strategy using a cutoff age at 60 years and distal adenoma as the sentinel lesion is an effective screening program in the average-risk Chinese population.     

Adherence to Surveillance Guidelines after the Removal of Colorectal Polyps: A Multinational,Multicenter, Prospective Survey

Background/AimsAs the number of colonoscopies and polypectomies performed continues to increase in many Asian countries, there is a great demand for surveillance colonoscopy. The aim of this study was to investigate the adherence to postpolypectomy surveillance guidelines among physicians in Asia.MethodsA survey study was performed in seven Asian countries. An email invitation with a link to the survey was sent to participants who were asked to complete the questionnaire consisting of eight clinical scenarios.ResultsOf the 137 doctors invited, 123 (89.8%) provided valid responses. Approximately 50% of the participants adhered to the guidelines regardless of the risk of adenoma, except in the case of tubulovillous adenoma ≥10 mm combined with high-grade dysplasia, in which 35% of the participants adhered to the guidelines. The participants were stratified according to the number of colonoscopies performed ≥20 colonoscopies per month (high volume group) and <20 colonoscopies per month (low volume group). Higher adherence to the postpolypectomy surveillance guidelines was evident in the high volume group (60%) than in the low volume group (25%). The reasons for nonadherence included concern of missed polyps (59%), the low cost of colonoscopy (26%), concern of incomplete resection (25%), and concern of medical liability (15%).ConclusionsA discrepancy between clinical practice and surveillance guidelines among physicians in Asia was found. Physicians in the low volume group frequently did not adhere to the guidelines, suggesting a need for continuing education and appropriate control. Concerns regarding the quality of colonoscopy and complete polypectomy were the main reasons for nonadherence.     

Remifentanil Compared with Midazolam and Pethidine Sedation During Colonoscopy: A Prospective, Randomized Study

Purpose The objective of our study was to compare the safety and efficacy of remifentanil during colonoscopy with those of the standard combination of midazolam and pethidine. Methods One-hundred and sixteen consecutive patients scheduled for colonoscopy were randomly assigned to groups A or B. Patients in group A (n = 56) received intravenous (IV) midazolam and pethidine. Patients in group B (n = 60) received IV remifentanil. Results Recovery was faster in group B (0 min) than in group A (56 ± 11.3 min) (P < 0.001). There was a marked difference between groups B and A with regard to the time of hospital discharge—28.7 ± 4.3 and 148.9 ± 34 min, respectively (P < 0.001). Patients in group A rated the procedure as comfortable, as also did those in group B. A combination of midazolam and pethidine had a greater affect on patients’ cardiorespiratory characteristics. Conclusion Remifentanil during colonoscopy provides sufficient pain relief with better hemodynamic stability, less respiratory depression, and significantly faster recovery and hospital discharge than moderate sedation with midazolam and pethidine.     

Use of colonoscopy in the management of patients with Crohn's disease: Appropriateness and diagnostic yield

IntroductionColonoscopy is a necessary tool in the management of Crohn's disease, but the benefit achieved by the procedure is a matter of debate. In the present study we evaluate the clinical impact of performing colonoscopy in Crohn's disease patients.MethodsConsecutive patients with Crohn's disease undergoing colonoscopy were considered. The following issues were considered: appropriateness of indications; relevant findings able to change the management of the patients; the endoscopist's management decisions based on patient's clinical picture, i.e. increased, maintained or decreased treatment, compared with those selected after performing endoscopy.Results204 patients (116 male/88 female, mean age 41 years) were included. Colonoscopy was judged indicated in 52.9% cases, according to current guidelines. In 54% of patients, endoscopy revealed a significant lesion, and this rate was significantly lower for non-indicated procedures (25.9%, p < 0.0001). The endoscopic findings were in disagreement with symptoms in about 25% of cases, but the impact of the endoscopic findings on the endoscopist's decision was likely to be very small without any differences between appropriate and inappropriate procedures.ConclusionsEndoscopy is a potent tool in the management of Crohn's disease, if correctly used, but in the majority of cases a correct therapeutic decision may be established simply on the basis of clinical picture and non-invasive markers, whilst relevant endoscopic findings have a relatively low impact on the medical treatment.     

Comparison of Colonoscopy,Fecal Immunochemical Test,and Risk-Adapted Approach in a Colorectal Cancer Screening Trial (TARGET-C)

1. Download : Download high-res image (409KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Surveillance Colonoscopy in Individuals at Risk for Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer: An Evidence-Based Review

Purpose Surveillance colonoscopy plays an important role in the management of asymptomatic patients known to carry and suspected of carrying hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer gene mutations. Although the shortest interval between surveillance examinations may seem to offer the most benefit to patients, excessive use of this procedure may have unwanted consequences. This study was designed to evaluate the evidence and make recommendations regarding the optimal frequency of surveillance colonoscopy and the age at which to initiate surveillance based on the best available evidence. Methods MEDLINE was searched for all articles assessing surveillance colonoscopy from 1966 to 2004 by using the MESH terms “hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer” and “screening.” The evidence was systematically reviewed and a critical appraisal of the evidence was performed. Results There are no randomized, controlled, clinical trials examining the frequency of surveillance colonoscopy in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Three cohort studies were identified for review. There is one cohort study of good quality that provides evidence that surveillance colonoscopy every three years in patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer reduces the risk of developing colorectal cancer and the risk of death. The two remaining cohort studies provide poor evidence on which to make a recommendation. Conclusions The best available evidence supports surveillance with complete colonoscopy to the cecum every three years in patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (B recommendation). There is no evidence to support or refute more frequent screening. Further research is required to examine the potential harms and benefits of more frequent screening. However, given the potential for rapid progression from adenoma to carcinoma and missing lesions at colonoscopy, there is consensus that screening more frequently than every three years is required.     

Endoscopic Therapy of Early Colorectal Cancer (pT1) - A Prospective Study

INTRODUCTION: In a prospective study initiated in 1982, we have been investigating the question as to whether - and if so, which - pT1 carcinomas of the colorectum can be treated exclusively via the endoscope. METHOD: In the period between February 1, 1982 and April 30, 2001, a total of 5,470 polyps were removed endoscopically at the Medical Department I of the Klinikum Ludwigsburg. Among these lesions, a total of 144 (2.6 %) pT1 carcinomas were found in 141 patients. We were able to follow 120 patients with 123 pT1 carcinomas over a mean follow-up period of 46 months (range: 1-60). In low-risk situations (definitive removal in healthy tissue, G1-G2, no lymphatic involvement), endoscopic treatment alone usually represented sufficient treatment. In high-risk cases (removal in healthy tissue uncertain or negative, and/or lymphatic vessel involvement, and/or G3/G4), subsequent surgical resection was carried out. RESULTS: 64 cases were classified as high-risk, 59 as low-risk. Nevertheless, 9 patients with 10 low-risk carcinomas were submitted to surgery (young age, patient's own request). In none of these 10 cases was residual tumour or lymph node metastasis detected in the surgical specimen. 47 patients with 49 low-risk carcinomas were treated solely by endoscopic polypectomy using the diathermy snare, and 45 patients with 47 carcinomas remained recurrence-free during the follow-up period. In a single case, a local recurrence was detected 2 months after polypectomy and underwent curative resection. In another case, peritoneal carcinosis with tumour infiltrating into the colon developed 8 months after initial treatment; this, however, was most probably a recurrence of a previously operated carcinoma of the uterus. Among the high-risk cases, 10 were not submitted to surgery on account of advanced age and/or rejection of an operation by the patient; all remained recurrence-free. Among the surgically treated high-risk carcinomas, 3 surgical specimens contained residual tumour, while 2 revealed a lymph node metastasis. In our group of patients, no tumour-related mortality was seen among endoscopically treated patients. DISCUSSION: In the light of the fact that the reported mortality rate associated with open surgery for colorectal carcinoma is 3 % as compared with about 1 % risk of lymph node metastasis and 0,1 % mortality rate for the endoscopic modality, endoscopic removal of a pT1 tumour in a low-risk situation followed by appropriate surveillance can be considered as adequate treatment.     

Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance in the Elderly: Updates and Controversies

Colorectal cancer is common worldwide, and the elderly are disproportionately affected. Increasing age is a risk factor for the development of precancerous adenomas and colorectal cancer, thus raising the issue of screening and surveillance in older patients. Elderly patients are a diverse and heterogeneous group, and special considerations such as comorbid medical conditions, functional status and cognitive ability play a role in deciding on the utility of screening and surveillance. Colorectal cancer screening can be beneficial to patients, but at certain ages and under some circumstances the harm of screening outweighs the benefits. Increasing adverse events, poorer bowel preparation and more incomplete examinations are observed in older patients undergoing colonoscopy for diagnostic, screening and surveillance purposes. Decisions regarding screening, surveillance and treatment for colorectal cancer require a multidisciplinary approach that accounts not only for the patient’s age but also for their overall health, preferences and functional status. This review provides an update and examines the challenges surrounding colorectal cancer diagnosis, screening, and treatment in the elderly.     

Germline Cancer Susceptibility Gene Testing in Unselected Patients With Colorectal Adenocarcinoma: A Multicenter Prospective Study

1. Download : Download high-res image (283KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Risk Factors of Unplanned Readmission After Colorectal Surgery: A Prospective,Multicenter Study

Purpose Unplanned readmission after colorectal surgery is a relatively frequent event, knowledge of which often is inaccurate. This study was designed to examine the incidence and causes of readmissions and to determine the criteria that could predict them. Methods From June to September 2002, 1,421 patients were enrolled in a prospective, multicenter study performed by the Association Francaise de Chirurgie. The goal of the study was to determine mortality and morbidity after colorectal surgery for elective or emergency surgical management of diverticular disease or cancer. In the study, readmissions within three months after discharge were assessed. Results Of 1,421 patients, 342 patients (27 percent) were readmitted once after a mean period of 53 days. Among the readmissions, 248 (19.5 percent) were planned and 94 (7.5 percent) were unplanned (mainly for septic complications). With the multivariate logistic regression analysis, five independent factors were significantly associated with a higher risk of unplanned readmission (in order of importance): surgical field contamination, long duration of operation, need for an associated surgical procedure, hemoglobin level <12 g/dl, and absence of air testing after colorectal anastomosis. Conclusions The study permitted to individualize several factors significantly associated with a higher risk of unplanned readmission after colorectal surgery. Reprints are not available.     

Prospective Study Comparing Multislice CT Colonography With Colonoscopy in the Detection of Colorectal Cancer and Polyps

PURPOSE: Multislice CT colonography is an alternative to colonoscopy. The purpose of this study was to compare multislice CT colonography with colonoscopy in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancers. METHODS: Between June 2000 and December 2001, 45 males and 35 females (median age, 68 (29–83) years) with symptoms of colorectal disease were studied prospectively. All patients underwent multislice CT colonography and colonoscopy, and the findings were compared. RESULTS: Colonoscopy was incomplete in 18 (22 percent) patients because of obstructing lesions or technical difficulty, and multislice CT colonography was unsuccessful in 4 (5 percent) because of fecal residue. Colonoscopy was normal in 26 patients and detected 29 colorectal cancers and 33 polyps in 35 patients, diverticulosis in 16 patients, and colitis in 3 patients. Multislice CT colonography identified 28 of 29 colorectal cancers with one false negative and one false positive (sensitivity, 97 percent; specificity, 98 percent; positive predictive value, 96 percent; negative predictive value, 98 percent). Multislice CT colonography identified all 12 polyps measuring 10 mm in diameter (sensitivity, 100 percent), 5 of 6 measuring 6 to 9 mm in diameter (sensitivity, 83 percent), 8 of 15 polyps 5 mm (sensitivity, 53 percent), and false-positive for 8 polyps. The overall sensitivity was 74 percent and specificity 96 percent. The positive predictive value for polyps was 88 percent, and the negative predictive value was 90 percent. Multislice CT colonography also detected 5 of 16 patients with diverticulosis (sensitivity, 31 percent; specificity, 98 percent) and colitis in 2 of 3 patients (sensitivity, 67 percent; specificity, 100 percent). In ten (13 percent) patients, extracolonic findings on multislice CT colonography altered management and included five patients with colorectal liver metastases. In 15 (19 percent) patients, there were incidental findings that did not demand further investigation. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this study indicate that the efficacy of multislice CT colonography in the detection of colorectal cancers and polyps 6 mm is similar to colonoscopy. Multislice CT colonography allows clinical staging of colorectal cancers, outlines the whole length of the colon in obstructing carcinoma when colonoscopy fails, and can identify extracolonic causes of abdominal symptoms.