Postdepletion Lymphocyte Reconstitution During Belatacept and Rapamycin Treatment in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Belatacept is used to prevent allograft rejection but fails to do so in a sizable minority of patients due to inadequate control of costimulation‐resistant T cells. In this study, we report control of costimulation‐resistant rejection when belatacept was combined with perioperative alemtuzumab‐mediated lymphocyte depletion and rapamycin. To assess the means by which the alemtuzumab, belatacept and rapamycin (ABR) regimen controls belatacept‐resistant rejection, we studied 20 ABR‐treated patients and characterized peripheral lymphocyte phenotype and functional responses to donor, third‐party and viral antigens using flow cytometry, intracellular cytokine staining and carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester–based lymphocyte proliferation. Compared with conventional immunosuppression in 10 patients, lymphocyte depletion evoked substantial homeostatic lymphocyte activation balanced by regulatory T and B cell phenotypes. The reconstituted T cell repertoire was enriched for CD28⁺ naïve cells, notably diminished in belatacept‐resistant CD28^? memory subsets and depleted of polyfunctional donor‐specific T cells but able to respond to third‐party and latent herpes viruses. B cell responses were similarly favorable, without alloantibody development and a reduction in memory subsets—changes not seen in conventionally treated patients. The ABR regimen uniquely altered the immune profile, producing a repertoire enriched for CD28⁺ T cells, hyporesponsive to donor alloantigen and competent in its protective immune capabilities. The resulting repertoire was permissive for control of rejection with belatacept monotherapy.

     

De Novo Belatacept in a Human Immunodeficiency Virus–Positive Kidney Transplant Recipient

Benefits of belatacept‐based immunosuppressive regimens in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–positive renal transplant recipients include avoidance of drug interactions between calcineurin inhibitors and highly active antiretroviral agents and decreased likelihood or severity of nonimmune toxicities such as new‐onset diabetes after transplant, hyperlipidemia and hypertension. We report a successful case of de novo belatacept at >18 mo from transplant in an HIV‐positive black man aged 50 years who received his first transplant from a living related kidney donor. To our knowledge, this case is the first reported of belatacept use in an HIV‐positive renal transplant recipient.     

Belatacept Conversion in an HIV‐Positive Kidney Transplant Recipient With Prolonged Delayed Graft Function

We report an HIV‐positive renal transplant recipient with delayed graft function who was converted from tacrolimus to belatacept in an attempt to improve renal function. The patient had kidney biopsies at 4 and 8 weeks posttransplant that revealed acute tubular necrosis and mild fibrosis. After 14 weeks of delayed function, belatacept was initiated and tacrolimus was weaned off. Shortly after discontinuing tacrolimus, renal function began to improve. The patient was able to discontinue dialysis 21 weeks posttransplant. HIV viral load was undetectable at last follow‐up. To our knowledge, this is the first report of belatacept use in a patient with HIV.     

Lessons Learned: Early Termination of a Randomized Trial of Calcineurin Inhibitor and Corticosteroid Avoidance Using Belatacept

The intent of this National Institutes of Health–sponsored study was to compare a belatacept‐based immunosuppressive regimen with a maintenance regimen of tacrolimus and mycophenolate. Nineteen primary, Epstein–Barr virus–immune renal transplant recipients with a negative cross‐match were randomized to one of three groups. All patient groups received perioperative steroids and maintenance mycophenolate mofetil. Patients in groups 1 and 2 were induced with alemtuzumab and maintained on tacrolimus or belatacept, respectively. Patients in group 3 were induced with basiliximab, received 3 mo of tacrolimus, and maintained on belatacept. There was one death with a functioning allograft due to endocarditis (group 1). There were three graft losses due to vascular thrombosis (all group 2) and one graft loss due to glomerular disease (group 1). Biopsy‐proven acute cellular rejection was more frequent in the belatacept‐treated groups, with 10 treated episodes in seven participants compared with one episode in group 1; however, estimated GFR was similar between groups at week 52. There were no episodes of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder or opportunistic infections in any group. Protocol enrollment was halted prematurely because of a high rate of serious adverse events. Such negative outcomes pose challenges to clinical investigators, who ultimately must weigh the risks and benefits in randomized trials.     

Belatacept Combined With Transient Calcineurin Inhibitor Therapy Prevents Rejection and Promotes Improved Long‐Term Renal Allograft Function

Belatacept, a T cell costimulation blocker, demonstrated superior renal function, lower cardiovascular risk, and improved graft and patient survival in renal transplant recipients. Despite the potential benefits, adoption of belatacept has been limited in part due to concerns regarding higher rates and grades of acute rejection in clinical trials. Since July 2011, we have utilized belatacept‐based immunosuppression regimens in clinical practice. In this retrospective analysis of 745 patients undergoing renal transplantation at our center, we compared patients treated with belatacept (n = 535) with a historical cohort receiving a tacrolimus‐based protocol (n = 205). Patient and graft survival were equivalent for all groups. An increased rate of acute rejection was observed in an initial cohort treated with a protocol similar to the low‐intensity regimen from the BENEFIT trial versus the historical tacrolimus group (50.5% vs. 20.5%). The addition of a transient course of tacrolimus reduced rejection rates to acceptable levels (16%). Treatment with belatacept was associated with superior estimated GFR (belatacept 63.8 mL/min vs. tacrolimus 46.2 mL/min at 4 years, p < 0.0001). There were no differences in serious infections including rates of cytomegalovirus or BK viremia. We describe the development of a costimulatory blockade‐based strategy that ultimately allows renal transplant recipients to achieve calcineurin inhibitor–free immunosuppression.     

The impact of belatacept on third‐party HLA alloantibodies in highly sensitized kidney transplant recipients

Recent evidence suggests that belatacept reduces the durability of preexisting antibodies to class I and class II human leukocyte antigens (HLAs). In this case series of 163 highly sensitized kidney transplant candidates whose calculated panel‐reactive antibody (cPRA) activity was ≥98% to 100%, the impact of belatacept on preexisting HLA antibodies was assessed. Of the 163 candidates, 72 underwent transplantation between December 4, 2014 and April 15, 2017; 60 of these transplanted patients remained on belatacept consecutively for at least 6 months. We observed a decrease in the breadth and/or strength of HLA class I antibodies as assessed by FlowPRA in belatacept‐treated patients compared to controls who did not receive belatacept. Specifically, significant HLA antibody reduction was evident for class I (P < .0009). Posttransplant belatacept‐treated patients also had a clinically significant reduction in their cPRA compared to controls (P < .01). Collectively, these findings suggest belatacept can reduce HLA class I antibodies in a significant proportion of highly sensitized recipients and could be an option to improve pretransplant compatibility with organ donors.     

Belatacept during pregnancy in renal transplant recipients: Two case reports

Impaired fertility is common among patients with chronic organ failure, including end‐stage renal disease (ESRD). Women of childbearing age undergoing transplantation may experience rapid return of fertility. Pregnancy posttransplant presents numerous risks for the patient, fetus, and allograft. Maternal risks include hypertension and preeclampsia. Allograft risks include acute rejection and failure of the organ, and fetal risks include miscarriage, birth defects from immunosuppressants, premature delivery, and low birth weight. Belatacept, a selective T cell costimulation blocker, was approved for use in kidney transplant recipients in the United States in 2011. Little is known about the safety of belatacept during pregnancy in humans. We describe 2 cases of successful pregnancy and delivery with the use of belatacept‐based immunosuppression. The Transplant Pregnancy Registry International (TPR) is a voluntary registry for transplant recipients who have had pregnancies or fathered a pregnancy posttransplant. To date, these 2 cases are the only known exposures to belatacept that have been reported to the TPR. 1     

Increased Pretransplant Frequency of CD28+ CD4+ TEM Predicts Belatacept‐Resistant Rejection in Human Renal Transplant Recipients

While most human T cells express the CD28 costimulatory molecule constitutively, it is well known that age, inflammation, and viral infection can drive the generation of CD28^null T cells. In vitro studies have demonstrated that CD28^null cell effector function is not impacted by the presence of the CD28 costimulation blocker belatacept. As such, a prevailing hypothesis suggests that CD28^null cells may precipitate costimulation blockade‐resistant rejection. However, CD28⁺ cells possess more proliferative and multifunctional capacity, factors that may increase their ability to successfully mediate rejection. Here, we performed a retrospective immunophenotypic analysis of adult renal transplant recipients who experienced acute rejection on belatacept treatment as compared to those who did not. Intriguingly, our findings suggest that patients possessing higher frequency of CD28⁺ CD4⁺ T_EM prior to transplant were more likely to experience acute rejection following treatment with a belatacept‐based immunosuppressive regimen. Mechanistically, CD28⁺ CD4⁺ T_EM contained significantly more IL‐2 producers. In contrast, CD28^null CD4⁺ T_EM isolated from stable belatacept‐treated patients exhibited higher expression of the 2B4 coinhibitory molecule as compared to those isolated from patients who rejected. These data raise the possibility that pretransplant frequencies of CD28⁺ CD4⁺ T_EM could be used as a biomarker to predict risk of rejection following treatment with belatacept.     

De novo belatacept in clinical vascularized composite allotransplantation

Most immunosuppressive regimens used in clinical vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) have been calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)‐based. As such, most recipients have experienced CNI‐related side effects. Costimulation blockade, specifically CD28/B7 inhibition with belatacept, has emerged as a clinical replacement for CNI‐based immunosuppression in kidney transplantation. We have previously shown that belatacept can be used as a centerpiece immunosuppressant for VCA in nonhuman primates, and subsequently reported successful conversion from a CNI‐based regimen to a belatacept‐based regimen after clinical hand transplantation. We now report on the case of a hand transplant recipient, whom we have successfully treated with a de novo belatacept‐based regimen, transitioned to a CNI–free regimen. This case demonstrates that belatacept can provide sufficient prophylaxis from rejection without chronic CNI‐associated side effects, a particularly important goal in nonlifesaving solid organ transplants such as VCA.     

ASP2409, A Next‐Generation CTLA4‐Ig,Versus Belatacept in Renal Allograft Survival in Cynomolgus Monkeys

Belatacept is the first costimulatory blockade agent approved for maintenance immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients. Clinical results have indicated that belatacept is associated with superior renal function and improved metabolic profile; however, higher incidence of acute rejection and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder are the shortcomings of this agent. In this study, ASP2409, a new cytotoxic T‐lymphocyte associated protein 4‐immunoglobulin possessing 14‐fold higher in vitro CD86 binding affinity than belatacept, was tested for renal allograft survival in cynomolgus monkeys. ASP2409 monotherapy dose‐dependently prolonged renal allograft survival. Low‐dose ASP2409 in combination with a subtherapeutic dose of tacrolimus showed much longer median survival time than monotherapy. Similar allograft survival results were observed in regimens based on high‐dose ASP2409, belatacept, and therapeutic‐dose tacrolimus. The results of renal allograft histopathology with high‐dose ASP2409‐based regimens were not inferior to the belatacept‐based regimen. Moreover, higher frequencies of FoxP3‐positive regulatory T cells in renal allografts were observed in ASP2409‐ and belatacept‐based regimens compared with tacrolimus‐based regimens. No serious side effects related to ASP2409 administration were found during the study. These data suggest that ASP2409 is a promising candidate for calcineurin inhibitor‐sparing or ‐avoidance regimens.     

Belatacept in renal transplant recipient with mild immunologic risk factor: A pilot prospective study (BELACOR)

The benefit of belatacept on antibody‐mediated rejection (ABMR) incidence after kidney transplant with preformed donor‐specific antibodies (DSAs) has never been assessed. Between 2014 and 2016, we conducted a multicenter prospective clinical trial with 49 patients to determine kidney allograft outcome in recipients with preformed DSAs (maximal mean fluorescence intensity 500 to 3000) treated with belatacept (BELACOR trial). Immunosuppressive strategy included antithymocyte globulin, belatacept, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. An ancillary control group was designed retrospectively, including patients fulfilling the same inclusion criteria treated with calcineurin inhibitors. In BELACOR group, no patient exhibited acute ABMR, patient and allograft survival at 1 year was 100% and 95.4%, respectively, and the estimated glomerular filtration rate was 53.2 mL/min/1.73 m². However, the 12‐month incidence of acute T cell–mediated rejection was 25.4% (14.5% to 42.4%). Comparison with the control group showed significantly higher T cell–mediated rejection incidence only in the BELACOR group (P = .003). Considering the DSAs, the outcome was similar in the 2 groups except a significantly higher number of patients displayed a complete disappearance of class II DSAs in the BELACOR group (P = .001). Belatacept was not associated with an acute ABMR increased risk and may be considered as immunosuppressive strategy in transplant recipients with preformed DSAs (maximal mean fluorescence intensity 500 to 3000). Prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm these results.     

Belatacept‐based immunosuppression: A calcineurin inhibitor‐sparing regimen in heart transplant recipients

Belatacept (BTC) is indicated for prophylaxis of graft rejection in adults receiving a renal transplant (Tx). This retrospective observational study (three centers) included all heart transplant recipients receiving BTC between January 2014 and October 2018. Forty EBV+ patients mean GFR 35 ± 20 mL/min/m² were identified, among whom belatacept was initiated during the first 3 months after transplantation in 12 patients, and later in 28 patients. Several patients were multiorgan transplant recipients. Study outcomes were GFR, safety, and changes in immunosuppressive therapy. The main reason for switching to BTC was to preserve renal function, resulting in discontinuation of CNI and changes in immunosuppressive therapy in 76% of cases. At study closeout, 24/40 patients were still on BTC therapy. GFR was improved (+59%, P = .0002*) within 1 month, particularly in the early group. More episodes of rejection were observed among “late” patients (1 death). Sixteen treatment discontinuations were recorded: GFR recovery (n = 4), DSA no longer detectable (n = 1), compliance issues (n = 3), poor venous access (n = 2), multiple infections (n = 1), 1 death (fungal lung infection), and treatment failure (n = 4). Median follow‐up was 24 months. Four patients developed de novo DSA (MFI<1500). BTC is an effective alternative immunosuppressive for postoperative transient kidney failure, stabilizing delayed renal function, with acceptable safety profile under careful monitoring.     

Comparison of Utilization and Clinical Outcomes for Belatacept‐ and Tacrolimus‐Based Immunosuppression in Renal Transplant Recipients

The performance of belatacept in a real clinical setting has not been reported. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using registry data comparing 1‐year clinical outcomes between belatacept‐ and tacrolimus‐treated adult kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) from January 6, 2011, through January 12, 2014. Of 50 244 total patients, 417 received belatacept plus tacrolimus, 458 received belatacept alone, and 49 369 received tacrolimus alone at discharge. In the overall study cohort, belatacept alone was associated with a higher risk of 1‐year acute rejection, with the highest rates associated with non–lymphocyte‐depleting induction (adjusted hazard ratio 2.65, 95% confidence interval 1.90–3.70, p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in rejection rates between belatacept plus tacrolimus and tacrolimus alone. In KTRs who met inclusion criteria for the Belatacept Evaluation of Nephroprotection and Efficacy as First‐line Immunosuppression Trial–Extended Criteria Donors (BENEFIT‐EXT), 1‐year kidney function was higher with belatacept plus tacrolimus and belatacept alone versus tacrolimus alone (mean estimated GFR 65.6, 60.4 and 54.3 mL/min per 1.73 m², respectively; p < 0.001). The incidence of new‐onset diabetes after transplantation was significantly lower with belatacept plus tacrolimus and belatacept alone versus tacrolimus alone (1.7%, 2.2%, and 3.8%, respectively; p = 0.01). Despite improved graft function and metabolic complications with belatacept alone, it may be advisable to add short‐term tacrolimus in the first year after transplant and to consider lymphocyte‐depleting induction in patients with high rejection risk, as the risk–benefit ratio allows.     

Posttransplant reduction in preexisting donor‐specific antibody levels after belatacept‐ versus cyclosporine‐based immunosuppression: Post hoc analyses of BENEFIT and BENEFIT‐EXT

BENEFIT and BENEFIT‐EXT were phase III studies of cytotoxic T‐cell crossmatch–negative kidney transplant recipients randomized to belatacept more intense (MI)‐based, belatacept less intense (LI)‐based, or cyclosporine‐based immunosuppression. Following study completion, presence/absence of HLA‐specific antibodies was determined centrally via solid‐phase flow cytometry screening. Stored sera from anti‐HLA–positive patients were further tested with a single‐antigen bead assay to determine antibody specificities, presence/absence of donor‐specific antibodies (DSAs), and mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) of any DSAs present. The effect of belatacept‐based and cyclosporine‐based immunosuppression on MFI was explored post hoc in patients with preexisting DSAs enrolled to BENEFIT and BENEFIT‐EXT. In BENEFIT, preexisting DSAs were detected in 4.6%, 4.9%, and 6.3% of belatacept MI‐treated, belatacept LI‐treated, and cyclosporine‐treated patients, respectively. The corresponding values in BENEFIT‐EXT were 6.0%, 5.7%, and 9.2%. In both studies, most preexisting DSAs were of class I specificity. Over the first 24 months posttransplant, a greater proportion of preexisting DSAs in belatacept‐treated versus cyclosporine‐treated patients exhibited decreases or no change in MFI. MFI decline was more apparent with belatacept MI‐based versus belatacept LI‐based immunosuppression in both studies and more pronounced in BENEFIT‐EXT versus BENEFIT. Although derived post hoc, these data suggest that belatacept‐based immunosuppression decreases preexisting DSAs more effectively than cyclosporine‐based immunosuppression.     

Safe Conversion From Tacrolimus to Belatacept in High Immunologic Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients With Allograft Dysfunction

There is no literature on the use of belatacept for sensitized patients or regrafts in kidney transplantation. We present our initial experience in high immunologic risk kidney transplant recipients who were converted from tacrolimus to belatacept for presumed acute calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) toxicity and/or interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy. Six (mean age = 40 years) patients were switched from tacrolimus to belatacept at a median of 4 months posttransplant. Renal function improved significantly from a peak mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 23.8 ± 12.9 mL/min/1.73 m² prior to the switch to an eGFR of 42 ± 12.5 mL/min/1.73 m² (p = 0.03) at a mean follow‐up of 16.5 months postconversion. No new rejection episodes were diagnosed despite a prior history of rejection in 2/6 (33%) patients. Surveillance biopsies performed in 5/6 patients did not show subclinical rejection. No development of donor‐specific antibodies (DSA) was noted. In this preliminary investigation, we report improved kidney function without a concurrent increase in risk of rejection and DSA in six sensitized patients converted from tacrolimus to belatacept. Improvement in renal function was noted even in patients with chronic allograft fibrosis without evidence of acute CNI toxicity. Further studies with protocol biopsies are needed to ensure safety and wider applicability of this approach.     

Tailored use of belatacept in adolescent kidney transplantation

Adolescent transplant recipients are at risk for nonadherence, development of de novo donor‐specific antibody (dnDSA), and allograft loss. Belatacept, a selective T cell costimulatory blocker, is associated with reduced dnDSA, improved renal function, and prolonged allograft survival when compared to calcineurin inhibitor‐based regimens in adults; however, its use in children is scant. Three adolescents were initiated on belatacept between August 2017 and September 2018 at the time of kidney transplantation. Selection criteria included age ≥ 14 and EBV IgG + serostatus. Intraoperative alemtuzumab and methylprednisolone were given as induction therapy. Tailored maintenance therapy included steroid‐free belatacept and sirolimus for two patients. One patient was initially maintained steroid‐free on belatacept and belimumab, an inhibitor of B cell activating factor to treat concurrent systemic lupus erythematous; steroids were added subsequently. Renal function, biopsy‐proven rejection, dnDSA, allograft survival, infection, nonadherence, and proteinuria were monitored. Renal function was 86, 73, 52 mL/min/1.73 m² at 20, 20, and 8 months, respectively. There was 100% adherence to therapy and no development of dnDSA. All patients had treatable infections. One developed steroid‐responsive acute cellular rejection. Belatacept‐based regimens can be tailored for adolescent recipients with good short‐term clinical outcomes.