The Impact of IL28B Genetic Variants on Recurrent Hepatitis C in Liver Transplantation: Significant Lessons from a Dual Graft Case

IL28B genetic polymorphism is related to interferon‐sensitivity in chronic hepatitis C, but the significance of grafts carrying different genotypes from recipients is still unclear in liver transplantation. A 51‐year‐old Japanese male carrying a minor genotype underwent dual liver transplantation for liver cirrhosis due to hepatitis C virus (HCV). The left lobe graft carried a major genotype, and the right a minor genotype. He achieved virological response during the course of pegylated‐interferon and ribavirin therapy against recurrent hepatitis C for 2 years, but HCV relapsed immediately at the end of the therapy. Two years after antiviral therapy, liver biopsy was performed from each graft. The specimens showed A1F0 in the left lobe graft and A2F2 in the right. Moreover, quantitative polymerase chain reaction was performed using RNA extracted from each specimen to see there was no HCV RNA in the left lobe whereas there was in the right. This case provides clear evidence that IL28B genetic variants determine interferon sensitivity in recurrent hepatitis C following liver transplantation, which could result in new strategies for donor selection or for posttransplant antiviral therapy to HCV positive recipients.     

Living Donor Liver Transplantation Using Dual Grafts from Two Donors: A Feasible Option to Overcome Small‐for‐Size Graft Problems?

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) between adults inevitably implies two potential risks associated with a small-for-size graft for the recipient and small remnant liver for the donor. To overcome these problems, LDLT using dual grafts from two independent donors can be a solution, in which sufficient graft volume can be obtained while preserving donor safety. We present a case of LDLT that was managed successfully by using right and left lobe dual grafts from two donors. The recipient was a large-size male with hepatitis C cirrhosis complicated by multiple hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). The first donor donated a right lobe graft and the second donor donated a left lobe plus caudate lobe graft with the middle hepatic vein. Graft function was excellent throughout the course without evidence of small-for-size syndrome. In conclusion, LDLT using dual grafts can be justified in a selected case to avoid small-for-size graft problems without increasing independent donor risks.     

New prediction factors of small‐for‐size syndrome in living donor adult liver transplantation for chronic liver disease

Small‐for‐size syndrome (SFSS), which is characterized by synthetic dysfunction and prolonged cholestasis, is a major cause of worse short‐term prognoses after living donor adult liver transplantation (LDALT). However, the risks of SFSS remain unclear. The aim of this study was to clarify the risks of SFSS, which were analysed in 172 patients who underwent LDALT for chronic liver disease. Graft types included left lobe with caudate lobe graft (n = 110) and right lobe graft (n = 62). Thirty‐four cases (24 with left lobe grafts and 10 with right lobe grafts) were determined as SFSS. SFSS developed even if the actual graft‐to‐recipient standard liver volume ratio was >40%. Logistic regression analysis revealed three independent factors associated with SFSS development in left and right lobe grafts: donor age, actual graft‐to‐recipient native liver volume ratio, and Child’s score. Donor age and actual graft‐to‐recipient native liver volume ratio may become predictive factors for SFSS development in left and right lobe grafts in patients undergoing LDALT.     

Low prevalence of HBV DNA in the liver allograft from anti‐HBc‐positive donors: a single‐center experience

Pan J‐J, Oh S‐H, Soldevila‐Pico C, Nelson DR, Liu C. Low prevalence of HBV DNA in the liver allograft from anti‐HBc‐positive donors: a single‐center experience.
Clin Transplant 2011: 25: 164–170. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Allografts from donors positive for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti‐HBc⁺) can transmit hepatitis B virus (HBV) to the recipients. We aimed to study the prevalence of HBV DNA in liver allografts from anti‐HBc⁺ donors. Between January 2003 and December 2008, this retrospective study identified 18 patients who received a liver from an anti‐HBc⁺ donor. Pre‐ and post‐transplantation HBV serology and serum HBV DNA level of the study subjects were reviewed. DNA extracted from liver biopsy tissue was used for PCR assay. Immunohistochemistry was also performed to determine viral protein expression. We observed a low prevalence of HBV DNA in allografts from anti‐HBc⁺ donors even among patients who did not receive prophylaxis. Only one of 18 patients had detectable HBV DNA in the liver allograft. This recipient was seronegative for HBV before transplantation and did not receive prophylaxis after transplantation, and developed de novo hepatitis B. Of the five patients who were positive for both antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen and anti‐HBc before transplantation and did not receive prophylaxis after transplantation, none developed HBV infection. Prophylaxis for HBV is important for seronegative recipients receiving a liver from an anti‐HBc⁺ donor. Such prophylaxis may not be necessary for recipients who do not have detectable HBV DNA in the liver allograft.     

Liver transplantation for hepatitis B-related cirrhosis: recent advances

In the absence of preventative therapy, deceased-donor liver transplantation indicated for hepatitis B virus (HBV) cirrhosis results in dismal graft and patient survival due to HBV infection of the liver graft. Major advances in the management of HBV-infected recipients during the past 15 years have reduced the rate of graft infection, resulting in improved outcomes, comparable to those for patients transplanted for non-HBV indications. Long-term use of hepatitis B immunoglobulin for passive immunotherapy is effective in preventing re-infection. Combination therapy with hepatitis B immunoglobulin and lamivudine after liver transplantation reduces HBV recurrence. Adefovir dipoxil is a safe and effective alternative oral antiviral treatment for lamivudine-resistant mutant HBV. The high cost of hepatitis B immunoglobulin remains a problem that must be overcome by the development of HBV vaccines and potent adjuvants.     

Dual hepatitis virus infections in liver transplant: case report and a review of the literature

Abstract: Background: Liver transplantation (LT) using grafts from anti‐HBVcore antibody‐positive (anti‐HBVcAB+) donors carry risk for development of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. The long‐term course of hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients receiving anti‐HBVcAB+ grafts is poorly understood. Patients and methods: A patient with chronic hepatitis C received an anti‐HBVc+ graft and developed de novo hepatitis B after four months. We describe the 14 HCV patients who received antiHBVc+ grafts and the condition of disease. Results: Hepatitis B was treated successfully with lamivudine. One year later, breakthrough infection developed with a lamivudine‐resistant mutant. Addition of adefovir led to HBV surface antigen to surface antibody seroconversion after two yr, which was maintained long term. Antiviral therapy was discontinued. Liver biopsy revealed minimal histologic changes up to eight yr post‐LT. Survival of 14 recipients of antiHBVc+ allografts and 180 recipients of antiHBVc‐negative grafts was equal (minimum follow up of five yr). Liver biopsies at four yr showed grade 0/1 and stage 0/1 in >70%; only two patients showed bridging fibrosis. A literature review of dual hepatitis virus infection revealed an overall milder course of hepatitis post‐LT. Conclusion: The outcome of HCV patients receiving anti‐HBc+ grafts is good and may be associated with a milder course of recurrent HCV.     

Liver transplantation for primary biliary cirrhosis in a hepatitis endemic region: a single‐center Asian experience

Sun C‐K, Chen C‐L, Concejero AM, Wang C‐C, Wang S‐H, Liu Y‐W, Yang C‐H, Yong C‐C. Liver transplantation for primary biliary cirrhosis in a hepatitis endemic region: a single‐center Asian experience.
Clin Transplant 2011: 25: 47–53. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: From March 1984 to November 2008, we performed 539 primary liver transplantations (LTs). Nineteen (19, 3.5%) were transplanted for end‐stage liver disease secondary to primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). There were 17 (89%) female and 2 (11%) male recipients. The overall mean age was 50.3 ± 6.3 yr. The mean model for end‐stage liver disease, and Child–Turcotte–Pugh scores were 20.7 ± 2.1, and 11.0 ± 0.5, respectively. There were 2 (11%) United Network for Organ Sharing status 3, 16 (84%) 2B, and 1 (5%) 2A patients. Fourteen patients (14, 73.7%) underwent living donor LT, and five patients (26.3%) received deceased donor LT. The primary immunosuppression consisted of cyclosporine (n = 5) and tacrolimus (n = 14). Liver function returned to normal one month after transplantation. The overall mean follow‐up was 5.8 ± 0.8 yr (range, four months to 15.7 yr). The overall one‐, three‐, and five‐yr survival rates were 94.7%, 89.2%, and 89.2%, respectively. Without hepatitis B virus (HBV) prophylaxis, one patient acquired de novo HBV infection after receiving a graft from an anti‐HBc(+) donor. Another patient developed recurrent hepatitis C infection and expired 25 months after transplantation. Our results showed that HBV prophylaxis was effective not only against de novo infection, but it also worked on pre‐transplant HBV carrier with PBC and helped in virus clearance.     

Transplantation of a severely lacerated liver – a case report with review of the literature

Abstract:  Using lacerated livers for liver transplantation (LTx) can add an option to the extended donor criteria. We present an LTx case using a severely lacerated liver and review of the literature for reported cases. We used a high-grade lacerated liver from a 19-yr-old brain-dead patient caused by traffic accident. The liver had grade IV and II lacerations in the right and left lobe, respectively. Lacerations were managed by sealants, stitching and perihepatic packing. The liver was transplanted to a 49-yr-old man suffering from hepatocellular carcinoma on hepatitis C-induced liver cirrhosis. The two-yr follow-up was uneventful. All published LTx cases using traumatized livers (n = 18) were analyzed. The liver injury ranged from subcapsular hematoma to deep ruptures. Most reported lacerations were in the right lobe, which were managed by digital compression, suturing, electrocautery, and perihepatic packing. The reported complications were primary non- (18%), or poor function, liver abscess, bilioma, and subhepatic hematoma each in one case (5.5%). Six-month graft and patient survival were 71% and 88%, respectively. With meticulous management lacerated livers can be transplanted successfully. Because of complexity of the management, procurement and transplantation should be done by experienced liver surgeons. These organs are marginal grafts and should be offered to selected patients.     

First‐Degree Living‐Related Donor Liver Transplantation in Autoimmune Liver Diseases

Liver transplantation (LT) is the treatment of choice for end‐stage autoimmune liver diseases. However, the underlying disease may recur in the graft in some 20% of cases. The aim of this study is to determine whether LT using living donor grafts from first‐degree relatives results in higher rates of recurrence than grafts from more distant/unrelated donors. Two hundred sixty‐three patients, who underwent a first LT in the Toronto liver transplant program between January 2000 and March 2015 for autoimmune liver diseases, and had at least 6 months of post‐LT follow‐up, were included in this study. Of these, 72 (27%) received a graft from a first‐degree living‐related donor, 56 (21%) from a distant/unrelated living donor, and 135 (51%) from a deceased donor for primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) (n = 138, 52%), primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) (n = 69, 26%), autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) (n = 44, 17%), and overlap syndromes (n = 12, 5%). Recurrence occurred in 52 (20%) patients. Recurrence rates for each autoimmune liver disease were not significantly different after first‐degree living‐related, living‐unrelated, or deceased‐donor LT. Similarly, time to recurrence, recurrence‐related graft failure, graft survival, and patient survival were not significantly different between groups. In conclusion, first‐degree living‐related donor LT for PSC, PBC, or AIH is not associated with an increased risk of disease recurrence.     

Donor BMI >30 Is Not a Contraindication for Live Liver Donation

The increased prevalence of obesity worldwide threatens the pool of living liver donors. Although the negative effects of graft steatosis on liver donation and transplantation are well known, the impact of obesity in the absence of hepatic steatosis on outcome of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is unknown. Consequently, we compared the outcome of LDLT using donors with BMI <30 versus donors with BMI ≥30. Between April 2000 and May 2014, 105 patients received a right‐lobe liver graft from donors with BMI ≥30, whereas 364 recipients were transplanted with grafts from donors with BMI <30. Liver steatosis >10% was excluded in all donors with BMI >30 by imaging and liver biopsies. None of the donors had any other comorbidity. Donors with BMI <30 versus ≥30 had similar postoperative complication rates (Dindo‐Clavien ≥3b: 2% vs. 3%; p = 0.71) and lengths of hospital stay (6 vs. 6 days; p = 0.13). Recipient graft function, assessed by posttransplant peak serum bilirubin and international normalized ratio was identical. Furthermore, no difference was observed in recipient complication rates (Dindo‐Clavien ≥3b: 25% vs. 20%; p = 0.3) or lengths of hospital stay between groups. We concluded that donors with BMI ≥30, in the absence of graft steatosis, are not contraindicated for LDLT.     

大鼠边缘性体积供肝肝移植模型的实验研究

目的通过建立不同体积供肝的大鼠肝移植模型,探索边缘性体积供肝大小的适宜范围,为研究小肝综合征的发病机理及防治措施提供一种易于复制的小动物模型。方法将192只大鼠随机分为全肝移植组、半肝移植组、小体积供肝移植组及超小体积供肝移植组,每组48只,分别建立全肝、半肝、小体积供肝和超小体积供肝的大鼠肝移植模型。移植术后,4组各抽取24只大鼠用于观察存活率;抽取12只大鼠于移植术前,移植术后5、15、30、45及60min测定门静脉压力;另12只大鼠于术后24h测定谷丙转氨酶（ALT）水平。结果全肝移植组的7d累积生存率为100％（24／24）,半肝移植组为87．5％（21／24）,小体积供肝移植组为37．5％（9／24）,超小体积供肝移植组均于术后48h内死亡。全肝移植组术中开放门静脉后,60min内其门静脉压力稳定;半肝移植组大鼠在开放门静脉后,其门脉压力虽有小幅升高,但仍保持相对稳定;而小体积供肝移植组和超小体积供肝移植组开放门静脉后,其门静脉压力均显著升高,15min时均达到高峰,之后该2组的门静脉压力开始回落,至45～60min时逐渐稳定。供肝的体积大小与开放门静脉后5（r=-0．942）、15（r=-0．947）、30（r=-0．900）、45（r=-0．825）和60min（r=-0．705）时的门静脉压力均呈负相关关系（P〈0．001）。肝移植术后24h,全肝移植组和半肝移植组ALT水平均低于小体积供肝移植组及超小体积供肝移植组（P〈0．05）,且小体积供肝移植组ALT水平低于超小体积供肝移植组（P〈0．05）。供肝体积的大小与大鼠移植术后的ALT水平呈负相关关系（r=-0．685,P〈0．001）。结论大鼠部分肝移植模型中,供肝与受体标准肝脏体积比（Gv／sLV）的安全界限为50％,GV／SLV为30％～35％的供肝可视为边缘性体积供肝,小于30％的供肝可视为超小体积供肝。     

Beneficial Effects of Short-Term Lamivudine Treatment for de novo Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation After Liver Transplantation

Clearance of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) by lamivudine is achieved in only a small proportion of patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. We investigated the effect of lamivudine on de novo HBV reactivation after living-donor liver transplantation when the number of HBV was expected to be very small. Thirty-eight HBV-naive recipients who received liver grafts from antibodies to core antigen-positive donors receiving hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) were studied. HBsAg appeared in nine cases (23.7 %) despite receiving HBIG for 12-71 months (mean: 35.1 months) after transplantation. Lamivudine treatment was started in six recipients during the acute phase of HBV reactivation. Five of the six recipients achieved complete clearance of HBsAg in sera at a median of 4.6 months (ranging from 21 to 330 days) after lamivudine administration. Although lamivudine was stopped in four cases, all remained negative for HBsAg. Our findings suggested that short-term lamivudine treatment during acute phase of HBV reactivation could achieve complete clearance of HBsAg in a significant number of liver transplant recipients.     

Transplantation of Declined Liver Allografts Following Normothermic Ex‐Situ Evaluation

The demand for liver transplantation (LT) exceeds supply, with rising waiting list mortality. Utilization of high‐risk organs is low and a substantial number of procured livers are discarded. We report the first series of five transplants with rejected livers following viability assessment by normothermic machine perfusion of the liver (NMP‐L). The evaluation protocol consisted of perfusate lactate, bile production, vascular flows, and liver appearance. All livers were exposed to a variable period of static cold storage prior to commencing NMP‐L. Four organs were recovered from donors after circulatory death and rejected due to prolonged donor warm ischemic times; one liver from a brain‐death donor was declined for high liver function tests (LFTs). The median (range) total graft preservation time was 798 (range 724–951) min. The transplant procedure was uneventful in every recipient, with immediate function in all grafts. The median in‐hospital stay was 10 (range 6–14) days. At present, all recipients are well, with normalized LFTs at median follow‐up of 7 (range 6–19) months. Viability assessment of high‐risk grafts using NMP‐L provides specific information on liver function and can permit their transplantation while minimizing the recipient risk of primary graft nonfunction. This novel approach may increase organ availability for LT.     

Split Liver Transplantation for Two Adult Recipients: An Initial Experience

The shortage of cadaver donor livers has been most severe for adult patients. Split liver transplantation is one method to expand the donor pool, but to have a significant impact on the waiting list, it needs to be applied for 2 adult recipients. We split livers from 6 cadaver donors, and transplanted 12 adult recipients. All splits were performed in situ with transection through the midplane of the liver, resulting in a right lobe and a left lobe graft. Mean donor age was 19.7 years; mean donor weight was 79.1 kg. Mean recipient age was 41.5 years. Mean weight of right lobe recipients was 89 kg; left lobe recipients, 60 kg. All donors were hemodynamically stable and had normal liver function tests. Mean operative time for the procurement was 7.4 h. Average blood loss during the transection of the liver was 490 mL. Mean GW/ RW ratio for all recipients was 0.87%; right lobe recipients, 0.86%; and left lobe recipients, 0.88%. With mean follow-up of 9.3 months, patient and graft survival rates were both 83.3%. There were 2 deaths: 1 after hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) and subsequent multiorgan failure; the other after HAT, a liver retransplant, and subsequent gram-negative sepsis. The remaining 10 recipients are doing well. We observed no cases of primary nonfunction. Other complications included bile leak and/or stenosis (n = 3), bleeding from the Roux loop (n = 1), bleeding after percutaneous biopsy (n = 1), and incisional hernia (n = 1). In conclusion, split liver transplantation, using 1 cadaver liver for 2 adult recipients, can be performed successfully. Crucial to success is proper donor and recipient selection.     

Toward 300 liver transplants a year

The technical success of cadaveric whole-size liver transplantation and better immunosuppressive drugs has extended the application of this life-saving procedure to include patients with irreversible acute and chronic liver diseases. However, because of the scarcity of cadaveric liver grafts, living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has emerged as an alternative to cadaveric-donor liver transplantation (CDLT), especially in Asia. In Korea, 8% of the population are hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers, and the resultant HBV cirrhosis, with or without hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), is common in the 40- to 60-year-old generation. Accordingly, many patients require orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). In 1992, we started performing CDLTs in the Asan Medical Center. In 1994, the first successful pediatric LDLT was performed in Korea, on a 9-monthold infant with biliary atresia. In 1997, the first successful adult LDLT was performed in our department, using a left lobe, on a 37-year-old patient with HBV cirrhosis associated with HCC. Even after the first successful right-lobe LDLT, we faced the obstacle of anterior segment congestion of a right-lobe graft, and initiated reconstruction of the middle hepatic venous tributaries of a right-lobe graft in 1998. In 1999, we performed more than 100 OLTs a year. Insufficient graft size has hindered the expansion of adult LDLT, when the remaining left-lobe of potential donors is too small to assure donor safety. Dual two-left-lobe graft LDLT (transplanting from two donors into one recipient) was developed in 2000 to solve graft-size insufficiency and minimize donor risk. More than 200 OLTs a year have been performed since 2004, while broadening the indications for adult LDLT to near complete obstruction of the portal vein, with the application of intraoperative portography (IOP) and portal vein stenting. In 2007, 320 LTs were performed, including 276 adult LDLTs, 10 pediatric LDLTs, and 34 CDLTs (including 7 adult and 1 pediatric split-liver transplant). There has been no donor mortality in LDLT. With technical refinement and advanced perioperative care, the in-hospital mortality of recipients has dropped to 4%: attributed to the dedication of our liver transplantation team members.     

Antiviral treatment for hepatitis B virus recurrence following liver transplantation

The purpose of this study was to identify the factors associated with the recurrence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) following liver transplantation (LT) for HBV‐related disease and to recognize the outcome of treatment for HBV recurrence with oral nucleos(t)ide analogues. Six hundred and sixty‐seven LTs were performed for HBsAg‐positive adult patients in our institute from 1996 to 2010. HBV prophylaxis was performed by hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) monotherapy or HBIG and entecavir combination therapy. There were 63 cases (11.4%) of HBV recurrences during a median follow‐up of 51 months. The median time to HBV recurrence was 22 months. A preoperative HBV DNA load of more than 10⁵ IU/mL, HBIG monotherapy, and hepatocellular carcinoma in the explant liver were independent risk factors for HBV recurrence following LT in multivariate analysis. Patient survival at 10 yr was 54.2% for HBV‐recurrent patients. Among patients with HBV recurrence, HBsAg seroclearance was achieved in 13 patients (20.6%), but HBsAg seroclearance did not affect survival in these patients after the recurrence of HBV (p = 0.28). The recurrence of HBV led to graft failure in six cases. HBV recurrence should be prevented by strict management of pre‐transplant HBV viremia and an effective post‐transplant HBV prophylaxis.     

Application of pediatric donors in split liver transplantation: Is there an age limit?

The experience of using pediatric donors in split liver transplant is exceedingly rare. We aim to investigate the outcomes of recipients receiving split pediatric grafts. Sixteen pediatric recipients receiving split liver grafts from 8 pediatric donors < 7 years were enrolled. The donor and recipient characteristics, perioperative course, postoperative complications, and graft and recipient survival rates were evaluated. The mean follow‐up time was 8.0 ± 2.3 months. The graft and recipient survival rates were 100%. The liver function remained in the normal range at the end of the follow‐up time in all recipients. No life‐threatening complications were seen in these recipients, and the only surgery‐related complication was portal vein stenosis in 1 recipient. Cytomegalovirus infection was the most common complication (62.5%). The transaminase level was significant higher in extended right lobe recipients in the early postoperative days, but the difference vanished at the end of first week; postoperative complications and graft and recipient survival rates did not differ between left and right graft recipients. Notably, the youngest split donor graft (2.7 years old) was associated with ideal recipient outcomes. Split liver transplant using well‐selected pediatric donors is a promising strategy to expand pediatric donor source in well‐matched recipients.     

拉米呋定与乙肝疫苗预防HBcAb阳性供肝儿童肝移植术后新发乙肝病毒感染效果的对照研究

目的 比较拉米呋定与乙肝疫苗方案预防乙型肝炎核心抗体(hepatitis B core antibody,HBcAb)阳性供肝儿童肝移植术后新发乙型肝炎病毒(hepatitis B virus,HBV)感染效果.方法 对天津市第一中心医院自2013年5月—2019年6月251例接受HBcAb阳性供肝儿童肝移植的资料进行...     

Phenotypic Expression of Recurrent Disease After Liver Transplantation

Recurrence of the primary disease has become a major focus for transplant hepatologists both when investigating graft dysfunction and when tailoring immunosuppression to maximize graft survival. However, disease recurrence varies in penetrance, can be predictable or random, and does not always conform to the expected pattern of disease. The cholestatic hepatitis syndromes associated with hepatitis B and C are the most dramatic examples of phenotypic change. Being on immunosuppressive drugs may intensify the progression of infectious and malignant diseases, but this effect is not predictable. A significant minority of patients with each of the autoimmune diseases, counter‐intuitively, get recurrent disease despite immunosuppression of a potency that is adequate to prevent rejection of the liver graft. Disease patterns emerge after liver transplantation for cryptogenic cirrhosis that shed light on the cause of the native liver disease, for example, nonalcohol‐related fatty liver disease and autoimmune hepatitis. The phenotypic expression of disease recurrence can be modified by specific drugs used for immunosuppression and by HLA‐antigen matching profiles. Understanding and modifying the phenotypic expression of recurrent disease after liver transplantation is a fertile area for research and continued refinement of clinical care.     

Risk of de novo hepatitis in liver recipients from hepatitis-B core antibody-positive grafts - a systematic analysis

Skagen CL, Jou JH, Said A. Risk of de novo hepatitis in liver recipients from hepatitis‐B core antibody‐positive grafts – a systematic analysis.
Clin Transplant 2011: 25: E243–E249. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Many transplant programs utilize liver grafts from hepatitis‐B core antibody (HBcAb)‐positive and hepatitis‐B surface antigen (HBsAg)‐negative donors. However, there is risk for de novo hepatitis B (DNH) in recipients of these grafts. We reviewed 26 studies reporting the rates of DNH in recipients receiving HBcAb‐positive liver grafts. Four hundred and sixty‐two donor–recipient pairs were included to evaluate the risk of DNH stratified by the recipient’s immune status to hepatitis B and type of prophylactic therapy given, if any. The rate of DNH was highest (58%) in the stratum of hepatitis‐B (HBV) naïve recipients who did not receive prophylaxis. In HBV naïve recipients, prophylactic therapy (lamivudine and/or hepatitis‐B immunoglobulin – HBIG) reduced DNH to 11% (odds ratio [OR] = 11.1, 95% CI 4.98–25, p < 0.0001 for DNH without prophylaxis). Recipients with hepatitis‐B surface antibody (HBsAb) positivity had DNH rates of 18% without prophylaxis and 0% with prophylaxis (OR = 9.2, 95% CI 1.1–83.3, p = 0.039). Recipients with both HBsAb and HBcAb positivity had DNH rates of 4% without prophylaxis and 3% with prophylaxis (p = 1.00), while recipients with HBcAb positivity alone had DNH rates of 14% without prophylaxis and 3% with prophylaxis (p = 0.21). There was no significant difference between the types of HBV prophylaxis received whether lamivudine, HBIG or both. However, in the subgroup who received HBIG alone, rates of DNH were higher after cessation of HBIG prophylaxis compared to DNH rates with indefinite HBIG (p = 0.0002). In summary, the risk of DNH is highest for HBV naïve liver recipients from HBcAb‐positive donors. Recipients who are HBV naïve as well as those recipients with isolated HBsAb positivity derive significant benefit from HBV prophylaxis after transplantation with a HBcAb‐positive graft. The ideal prophylactic regimen for prevention of DNH is unclear, but based on our analysis of the literature, antivirals alone may suffice. More data are needed with the newer antivirals for hepatitis B.