The Role of Antiviral Prophylaxis for the Prevention of Epstein–Barr Virus–Associated Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disease in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review

The role of antiviral prophylaxis for the prevention of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) remains controversial for solid organ transplantation (SOT) recipients who are seronegative for Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) but who received organs from seropositive donors. We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis to address this issue. Two independent assessors extracted data from studies after determining patient eligibility and completing quality assessments. Overall, 31 studies were identified and included in the quantitative synthesis. Nine studies were included in the direct comparisons (total 2366 participants), and 22 were included in the indirect analysis. There was no significant difference in the rate of EBV‐associated PTLD in SOT recipients among those who received prophylaxis (acyclovir, valacyclovir, ganciclovir, valganciclovir) compared with those who did not receive prophylaxis (nine studies; risk ratio 0.95, 95% confidence interval 0.58–1.54). No significant differences were noted across all types of organ transplants, age groups, or antiviral use as prophylaxis or preemptive therapy. There was no significant heterogeneity in the effect of antiviral prophylaxis on the incidence of PTLD. In conclusion, the use of antiviral prophylaxis in high‐risk EBV‐naive patients has no effect on the incidence of PTLD in SOT recipients.     

BK Virus Nephropathy: Histological Evolution by Sequential Pathology

Reactivation of BK virus in renal allografts causes a destructive chronic infection. This single‐center retrospective cohort study describes the evolution of BK virus allograft nephropathy (BKVAN) from 63 kidneys (from 61 patients) using sequential histopathology (454 biopsies, averaging 7.8 ± 2.6 per kidney) followed for 60.1 mo. Uninfected protocol biopsies formulated time‐matched control Banff scores (n = 975). Interstitial inflammation occurred in 73% at diagnosis, correlating with viral histopathology (r = 0.413, p = 0.008) and amplifying early injury with accelerated interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IF/TA, p = 0.017) by 3 mo. Prodromal simian virus 40 large T antigen (SV40T)–negative inflammation with viremia preceded the histological diagnosis in 23.8%. Persistent subacute injury from viral cytopathic effect was associated with acute tubular necrosis and ongoing interstitial inflammation, culminating in IF/TA in 86.9%. Overall, cellular interstitial infiltration mitigated the intensity of subsequent tubular injury, SV40T, and tissue viral load, assessed by sequential paired histology (p < 0.001). Graft loss was predicted by high‐level viremia (hazard ratio [HR] 4.996, 95% CI 2.19–11.396, p < 0.001), deceased donor (HR 3.201, 95% CI 1.149–8.915, p = 0.026), and late acute rejection (HR 3.124, 95% CI 1.037–9.413, p = 0.043). Transplant failure occurred in 38.1%, with uncontrolled infection (58.3%) and SV40T‐negative chronic rejection (41.7%) causing losses. BKVAN is characterized by subacute virus‐induced tubular injury, inflammation, and progressive nephron destruction. Effective antiviral therapy remains an unmet clinical need.     

Impact of Antiviral Preventive Strategies on the Incidence and Outcomes of Cytomegalovirus Disease in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

We assessed the impact of antiviral prophylaxis and preemptive therapy on the incidence and outcomes of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in a nationwide prospective cohort of solid organ transplant recipients. Risk factors associated with CMV disease and graft failure‐free survival were analyzed using Cox regression models. One thousand two hundred thirty‐nine patients transplanted from May 2008 until March 2011 were included; 466 (38%) patients received CMV prophylaxis and 522 (42%) patients were managed preemptively. Overall incidence of CMV disease was 6.05% and was linked to CMV serostatus (D+/R? vs. R+, hazard ratio [HR] 5.36 [95% CI 3.14–9.14], p < 0.001). No difference in the incidence of CMV disease was observed in patients receiving antiviral prophylaxis as compared to the preemptive approach (HR 1.16 [95% CI 0.63–2.17], p = 0.63). CMV disease was not associated with a lower graft failure‐free survival (HR 1.27 [95% CI 0.64–2.53], p = 0.50). Nevertheless, patients followed by the preemptive approach had an inferior graft failure‐free survival after a median of 1.05 years of follow‐up (HR 1.63 [95% CI 1.01–2.64], p = 0.044). The incidence of CMV disease in this cohort was low and not influenced by the preventive strategy used. However, patients on CMV prophylaxis were more likely to be free from graft failure.

     

Cytomegalovirus prevention strategies and the risk of BK polyomavirus viremia and nephropathy

Polyomavirus BK (BKV) is the cause of polyomavirus‐associated nephropathy resulting in premature graft loss. There are limited data regarding the role of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and its prevention in developing BKV viremia and PVAN. In a prospective study, we analyzed 207 consecutive renal transplant recipients previously enrolled in 2 randomized trials evaluating different CMV prevention regimens with routine screening for BKV and CMV. Of these, 59 received valganciclovir and 100 valacyclovir prophylaxis; 48 patients were managed by preemptive therapy. At 3 years, the incidence of BKV viremia and PVAN was 28% and 5%, respectively. CMV DNAemia developed in 55% and CMV disease in 6%. Both BKV viremia (42% vs 23% vs 21%, P = .006) and PVAN (12% vs 2% vs 2%, P = .011) were increased in patients treated with valganciclovir prophylaxis compared to valacyclovir and preemptive therapy. Using multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression, valganciclovir prophylaxis was independent predictor of BKV viremia (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.38, P = .002) and PVAN (HR = 4.73, P = .026). In contrast, the risk of subsequent BKV viremia was lower in patients with antecedent CMV DNAemia (HR = 0.50, P = .018). These data suggest valganciclovir prophylaxis may be associated with increased risk of BKV viremia and PVAN. CMV DNAemia did not represent a risk for BKV.     

Identification of Optimal Donor–Recipient Combinations Among Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)–Positive Kidney Transplant Recipients

For some patient subgroups, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection has been associated with worse outcomes after kidney transplantation (KT); potentially modifiable factors may be responsible. The study goal was to identify factors that predict a higher risk of graft loss among HIV‐positive KT recipients compared with a similar transplant among HIV‐negative recipients. In this study, 82 762 deceased donor KT recipients (HIV positive: 526; HIV negative: 82 236) reported to the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) (2001–2013) were studied by interaction term analysis. Compared to HIV‐negative recipients, the hepatitis C virus (HCV) amplified risk 2.72‐fold among HIV‐positive KT recipients (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 2.72, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.75–4.22, p < 0.001). Forty‐three percent of the excess risk was attributable to the interaction between HIV and HCV (attributable proportion of risk due to the interaction [AP]: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.23–0.63, p = 0.02). Among HIV‐positive recipients with more than three HLA mismatches (MMs), risk was amplified 1.80‐fold compared to HIV‐negative (aHR: 1.80, 95% CI: 1.31–2.47, p < 0.001); 42% of the excess risk was attributable to the interaction between HIV and more than three HLA MMs (AP: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.24–0.60, p = 0.01). High‐HIV‐risk (HIV‐positive/HCV‐positive HLAwith more than three MMs) recipients had a 3.86‐fold increased risk compared to low‐HIV‐risk (HIV‐positive/HCV‐negative HLA with three or fewer MMs)) recipients (aHR: 3.86, 95% CI: 2.37–6.30, p < 0.001). Avoidance of more than three HLA MMs in HIV‐positive KT recipients, particularly among coinfected patients, may mitigate the increased risk of graft loss associated with HIV infection.     

Epidemiology and Immediate Indirect Effects of Respiratory Viruses in Lung Transplant Recipients: A 5‐Year Prospective Study

The epidemiology of respiratory viruses (RVs) in lung transplant recipients (LTRs) and the relationship of RVs to lung function, acute rejection (AR) and opportunistic infections in these patients are not well known. We performed a prospective cohort study (2009–2014) by collecting nasopharyngeal swabs (NPSs) from asymptomatic LTRs during seasonal changes and from LTRs with upper respiratory tract infectious disease (URTID), lower respiratory tract infectious disease (LRTID) and AR. NPSs were analyzed by multiplex polymerase chain reaction. Overall, 1094 NPSs were collected from 98 patients with a 23.6% positivity rate and mean follow‐up of 3.4 years (interquartile range 2.5–4.0 years). Approximately half of URTIDs (47 of 97, 48.5%) and tracheobronchitis cases (22 of 56, 39.3%) were caused by picornavirus, whereas pneumonia was caused mainly by paramyxovirus (four of nine, 44.4%) and influenza (two of nine, 22.2%). In LTRs with LRTID, lung function changed significantly at 1 mo (p = 0.03) and 3 mo (p = 0.04). In a nested case–control analysis, AR was associated with RVs (hazard ratio [HR] 6.54), Pseudomonas aeruginosa was associated with LRTID (HR 8.54), and cytomegalovirus (CMV) replication or disease was associated with URTID (HR 2.53) in the previous 3 mo. There was no association between RVs and Aspergillus spp. colonization or infection (HR 0.71). In conclusion, we documented a high incidence of RV infections in LTRs. LRTID produced significant lung function abnormalities. Associations were observed between AR and RVs, between P. aeruginosa colonization or infection and LRTID, and between CMV replication or disease and URTID.     

Association of antiviral prophylaxis and rituximab use with posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs): A nationwide cohort study

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a serious complication of solid organ transplantation (SOT). Most PTLD cases are associated with Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) infection. The role of antiviral prophylaxis or rituximab therapy for prevention of PTLD in SOT recipients is controversial. In a nationwide cohort, we assessed the incidence, presentation, and outcome of histologically proven PTLD. We included 4765 patients with a follow-up duration of 23 807 person-years (py). Fifty-seven PTLD cases were identified; 39 (68%) were EBV positive (EBV+ PTLD). Incidence rates for EBV+ PTLD at 1, 2, and 3 years posttransplant were 3.51, 2.24, and 1.75/1000 py and 0.44, 0.25, and 0.29/1000 py for EBV− PTLD. We did not find an effect of antiviral prophylaxis on early and late EBV+ PTLD occurrence (early EBV+ PTLD: SHR 0.535 [95% CI 0.199–1.436], p = .264; late EBV+ PTLD: SHR 2.213, [95% CI 0.751–6.521], p = .150). However, none of the patients (0/191) who received a rituximab-containing induction treatment experienced PTLD, but 57 of 4574 patients without rituximab induction developed PTLD. In an adjusted restricted mean survival time model, PTLD-free survival was significantly longer (0.104 years [95% CI 0.077–0.131]) in patients receiving rituximab as induction treatment. This study provides novel data on the association of rituximab induction and reduced risk for PTLD.     

Easier Control of Late‐Onset Cytomegalovirus Disease Following Universal Prophylaxis Through an Early Antiviral Immune Response in Donor‐Positive,Recipient‐Negative Kidney Transplants

Universal prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prevention is viable but, compared with a preemptive strategy, leads to higher incidence of late‐onset disease (LOD) associated with poor patient and graft survival. The purpose of this study was to compare LOD with early onset disease (EOD), with a focus on the highest risk kidney transplant recipients (KTRs): CMV seronegative recipients transplanted from seropositive donors (D+R?). Since CMV control depends on both antiviral treatment and specific immune response, we also compared Vδ2‐negative (Vδ2^neg) γδ T cell expansion involved in CMV infection resolution. EOD was defined as occurring <3 mo and LOD as occurring >3 mo after transplantation. Depending on the period, universal prophylaxis or preemptive treatment was used. Overall, 168 D+R? KTRs were included between 2003 and 2011. LOD was associated with a lower peak DNAemia (p = 0.04), fewer recurrences (odds ratio 0.16; 95% confidence interval 0.05–0.55; p = 0.01) and shorter anti‐CMV curative treatment (40 vs. 60 days, p < 0.0001). As a corollary, we found that Vδ2^neg γδ T cell expansion was faster in LOD than in EOD (31 vs. 168 days after the beginning of CMV disease, p < 0.0001). In D+R? KTRs, universal prophylaxis is associated with more LOD, which had better infection management and a faster immune response. These results support the use of universal prophylaxis over a preemptive strategy and reappraise outcomes of LOD.     

Risk Factors Associated With Early Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Results From a Multinational Matched Case–Control Study

Risk factors for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) after kidney transplantation have been poorly explored. We performed a multinational case–control study that included 51 kidney transplant (KT) recipients diagnosed with early (first 180 posttransplant days) IPA at 19 institutions between 2000 and 2013. Control recipients were matched (1:1 ratio) by center and date of transplantation. Overall mortality among cases was 60.8%, and 25.0% of living recipients experienced graft loss. Pretransplant diagnosis of chronic pulmonary obstructive disease (COPD; odds ratio [OR]: 9.96; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09–90.58; p = 0.041) and delayed graft function (OR: 3.40; 95% CI: 1.08–10.73; p = 0.037) were identified as independent risk factors for IPA among those variables already available in the immediate peritransplant period. The development of bloodstream infection (OR: 18.76; 95% CI: 1.04–339.37; p = 0.047) and acute graft rejection (OR: 40.73, 95% CI: 3.63–456.98; p = 0.003) within the 3 mo prior to the diagnosis of IPA acted as risk factors during the subsequent period. In conclusion, pretransplant COPD, impaired graft function and the occurrence of serious posttransplant infections may be useful to identify KT recipients at the highest risk of early IPA. Future studies should explore the potential benefit of antimold prophylaxis in this group.     

Clinical and virologic outcomes in high‐risk adult Epstein‐Barr virus mismatched organ transplant recipients

Epstein‐Barr virus (EBV) D+/R? organ transplant recipients are a high‐risk group for developing post‐transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD). Little data are available for prevention in the adult EBV mismatched population. We conducted a retrospective study of EBV D+/R? organ transplants performed during 2002‐2014. Of the 153 patients identified, 82.4% patients received antiviral prophylaxis with valganciclovir for a median of 4.5 months (range: 0.8‐22 months) and 36.6% underwent viral load monitoring in the first post‐transplant year. EBV viremia developed in 67.2% monitored patients. In viremic patients, immunosuppression was reduced in 20/37(54.1%) in response to viremia and 17/37 (45.9%) received therapeutic dose valganciclovir. In patients with EBV viremia who received valganciclovir and/or had a reduction in immunosuppression and had sufficient viral load time points (n=31), 28 (90.3%) had a significant decline in viral load at day 14 (median log decline 0.49 (0.24‐0.64), P<.001) and at day 30 (0.87 (0.52‐1.21), P<.001). PTLD developed in 27 (15%) patients (biopsy proven=25, possible=2) at median 8 months (range: 2.4‐130) post‐transplant with the majority (81.5%) within the first year. In multivariate analysis, viral load monitoring and use of mycophenolate were associated with a lower incidence of PTLD. Antiviral prophylaxis was not associated with a lower risk of PTLD, but viral load monitoring and use of mycophenolate mofetil were protective.     

Outcomes of short-duration antiviral prophylaxis for hepatitis C positive donor kidney transplants

Trials describing 4- to 12-week courses of direct-acting antiviral drugs (DAAs) to treat hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission from infected donors to uninfected kidney transplant recipients (D+/R− transplants) may be limited in “real-world” application by costs and delayed access to DAAs. We previously reported HCV transmission of 13% among D+/R− transplants with 2- to 4-day pangenotypic sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) perioperative prophylaxis, where one patient with HCV transmission was a nonresponder to first-line full-course DAA. Here, we report new data with a 7-day prophylaxis protocol (N = 50), as well as cumulative treatment and outcome data on all HCV D+/R− transplants (N = 102). Overall, nine patients (9/102; 9%; 95% CI: 5%–16%) developed HCV transmission, with a significant decline noted in the 7-day group (2/50; 4%; 95% CI: 0%–13%) compared with 2- to 4-day prophylaxis (7/52; 13%; 95% CI: 5%–25%). All patients with HCV transmission achieved sustained virologic response post full-course therapy (including one nonresponder from initial trial). A 1:1 matched analysis (N = 102) with contemporary HCV D−/R− transplants (controls) showed that although the pretransplant wait time was significantly shorter for D+/R− compared with D−/R− (mean: 1.8 vs. 4.4 years; p < .001), there were no differences in infections, rejection, development of de novo donor-specific antibody, or transplant outcomes up to 6 months of transplant.     

Prophylactic CMV therapy does not improve three‐yr patient and graft survival compared to preemptive therapy

Despite increasing evidence in favor of prophylactic valganciclovir treatment in kidney transplant recipients for the prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, the impact of preemptive vs. prophylactic treatment on long‐term clinical outcomes is unclear. In this retrospective study, 187 kidney transplant recipients with serologic intermediate‐risk constellation (recipient CMV IgG positive) received either preemptive or prophylactic treatment with valganciclovir. Patient survival (primary endpoint), graft survival, viremia rates, and other CMV‐related outcomes were analyzed. Prophylactic therapy reduced the rates for CMV viremia during the first year (hazard ratio: 0.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.30–0.75; p < 0.001). There was a trend for higher three‐yr patient mortality in the prophylactic group (hazard ratio: 5.08, 95% CI 0.62–41.3; p = 0.091), and the rate of graft loss was not reduced (hazard ratio: 0.93, 95% CI 0.32–2.68; p = 0.894). Estimated glomerular filtration rate over three yr was on average 6.8 mL/min/1.73 m² lower in the prophylactic group (95% CI −11.68 to −1.81; p = 0.007) using a multivariate random effects model but showed more improvement over time. Prophylactic valganciclovir treatment reduced the rate of CMV infections during the first year post‐transplant but no effects of prophylactic treatment on patient and graft survival or kidney function over three yr were observed.     

Monitoring of CMV‐specific cell‐mediated immunity with a commercial ELISA‐based interferon‐γ release assay in kidney transplant recipients treated with antithymocyte globulin

Monitoring for cytomegalovirus (CMV)‐specific cell‐mediated immunity (CMV‐CMI) may be useful for individualizing valganciclovir (VGCV) prophylaxis after kidney transplantation (KT). We performed a commercial ELISA‐based interferon (IFN)‐γ release assay (QTF‐CMV) from posttransplant months 2‐5 (362 points) in 120 CMV‐seropositive KT recipients that received antithymocyte globulin as induction therapy and VGCV prophylaxis (median of 92 days). Forty‐seven patients (39.3%) had CMV infection after discontinuation of prophylaxis. The QTF‐CMV assay was reactive, nonreactive, and indeterminate in 264 (72.9%), 90 (24.9%), and 8 points (2.2%). The QTF‐CMV assay at prophylaxis discontinuation exhibited suboptimal accuracy for predicting protective CMV‐CMI (sensitivity: 77.4%; specificity: 34.3%; positive predictive value [PPV]: 64.1%; negative predictive value [NPV]: 50.0%), with no differences in 1‐year CMV infection rates between patients with negative (nonreactive or indeterminate) or reactive results (45.8% vs 36.1%; P = .244). Specificity and PPV to predict protective CMV‐CMI improved by elevating the IFN‐γ cutoff value to 1.13 IU/mL (65.7% and 71.4%) and 7.0 IU/mL (85.7% and 76.2%), although NPVs decreased. The QTF‐CMV assay as per manufacturer's interpretative criteria performed poorly to predict protection from CMV infection following discontinuation of VGCV prophylaxis among ATG‐treated CMV‐seropositive KT recipients. This performance is slightly improved by modifying the IFN‐γ positivity threshold.     

CCL8 and the Immune Control of Cytomegalovirus in Organ Transplant Recipients

Monitoring of cytomegalovirus cell‐mediated immunity is a promising tool for the refinement of preventative and therapeutic strategies posttransplantation. Typically, the interferon‐γ response to T cell stimulation is measured. We evaluated a broad range of cytokine and chemokines to better characterize the ex vivo host‐response to CMV peptide stimulation. In a cohort of CMV viremic organ transplant recipients, chemokine expression—specifically CCL8 (AUC 0.849 95% CI 0.721–0.978; p = 0.003) and CXCL10 (AUC 0.841, 95% CI 0.707–0.974; p = 0.004)—was associated with control of viral replication. In a second cohort of transplant recipients at high‐risk for CMV, the presence of a polymorphism in the CCL8 promoter conferred an increased risk of viral replication after discontinuation of antiviral prophylaxis (logrank hazard ratio 3.6; 95% CI 2.077–51.88). Using cell‐sorting experiments, we determined that the primary cell type producing CCL8 in response to CMV peptide stimulation was the monocyte fraction. Finally, in vitro experiments using standard immunosuppressive agents demonstrated a dose‐dependent reduction in CCL8 production. Chemokines appear to be important elements of the cell‐mediated response to CMV infection posttransplant, as here suggested for CCL8, and translation of this knowledge may allow for the tailoring and improvement of preventative strategies.     

Burden,epidemiology, and outcomes of microbiologically confirmed respiratory viral infections in solid organ transplant recipients: a nationwide,multi-season prospective cohort study

Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are exposed to respiratory viral infection (RVI) during seasonal epidemics; however, the associated burden of disease has not been fully characterized. We describe the epidemiology and outcomes of RVI in a cohort enrolling 3294 consecutive patients undergoing SOT from May 2008 to December 2015 in Switzerland. Patient and allograft outcomes, and RVI diagnosed during routine clinical practice were prospectively collected. Median follow-up was 3.4 years (interquartile range 1.61–5.56). Six hundred ninety-six RVIs were diagnosed in 151/334 (45%) lung and 265/2960 (9%) non-lung transplant recipients. Cumulative incidence was 60% (95% confidence interval [CI] 53%-69%) in lung and 12% (95% CI 11%-14%) in non-lung transplant recipients. RVI led to 17.9 (95% CI 15.7–20.5) hospital admissions per 1000 patient-years. Intensive care unit admission was required in 4% (27/691) of cases. Thirty-day all-cause case fatality rate was 0.9% (6/696). Using proportional hazard models we found that RVI (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.45; 95% CI 1.62–3.73), lower respiratory tract RVI (aHR 3.45; 95% CI 2.15–5.52), and influenza (aHR 3.57; 95% CI 1.75–7.26) were associated with graft failure or death. In this cohort of SOT recipients, RVI caused important morbidity and may affect long-term outcomes, underlying the need for improved preventive strategies.     

Increased Mortality and Graft Loss With Kidney Retransplantation Among Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)–Infected Recipients

Excellent outcomes have been demonstrated in primary human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–positive (HIV+) kidney transplant recipients, but a subset will lose their graft and seek retransplantation (re‐KT). To date, no study has examined outcomes among HIV+ re‐KT recipients. We studied risk for death and graft loss among 4149 (22 HIV+ vs. 4127 HIV‐negative [HIV?]) adult re‐KT recipients reported to the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) (2004–2013). Compared to HIV? re‐KT recipients, HIV+ re‐KT recipients were more commonly African American (63.6% vs. 26.7%, p < 0.001), infected with hepatitis C (31.8% vs. 5.0%, p < 0.001) and had longer median time on dialysis (4.8 years vs. 2.1 years, p = 0.02). There were no significant differences in length of time between the primary and re‐KT events by HIV status (1.5 years vs. 1.4 years, p = 0.52). HIV+ re‐KT recipients experienced a 3.11‐fold increased risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 3.11, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.82–5.34, p < 0.001) and a 1.96‐fold increased risk of graft loss (aHR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.14–3.36, p = 0.01) compared to HIV? re‐KT recipients. Re‐KT among HIV+ recipients was associated with increased risk for mortality and graft loss. Future research is needed to determine if a survival benefit is achieved with re‐KT in this vulnerable population.     

Cytomegalovirus transmission in mismatched solid organ transplant recipients: Are factors other than anti-viral prophylaxis at play?

Although antiviral prophylaxis has reduced cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNAemia and disease in seronegative solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients (R-) receiving seropositive donor organs (D+), its impact on CMV transmission is uncertain. Transmission, defined as CMV antigenemia/CMV DNAemia and/or seroconversion by year 2, and associated demographic risk factors were studied retrospectively in 428 D+/R- and 429 D-/R- patients receiving a SOT at our center. The cumulative transmission incidence was higher for lung (90.5%) and liver recipients (85.1%) than heart (72.7%), kidney (63.9%), and pancreas (56.2%) recipients (p < .001) and was significantly lower in living (50.1%) versus deceased donor (77.4%, p < .001) kidney recipients despite identical antiviral prophylaxis. In multivariate analysis, only allograft type predicted transmission risk (HR [CI] lung 1.609 [1.159, 2.234] and liver 1.644 [1.209, 2.234] vs kidney). For 53 D+ donating to >1 R- with adequate follow-up, 43 transmitted to all, three transmitted to none, and seven transmitted inconsistently with lungs and livers always transmitting but donor-matched heart, kidney or kidney-pancreas allografts sometimes not. Kidney pairs transmitted concordantly. CMV transmission risk is allograft-specific and unchanged despite antiviral prophylaxis. Tracking transmission and defining donor factors associated with transmission escape may provide novel opportunities for more targeted CMV prevention and improve outcome analysis in antiviral and vaccine trials.     

Pretransplant CD4 Count Influences Immune Reconstitution and Risk of Infectious Complications in Human Immunodeficiency Virus–Infected Kidney Allograft Recipients

In current practice, human immunodeficiency virus–infected (HIV⁺) candidates with CD4 >200 cells/mm³ are eligible for kidney transplantation; however, the optimal pretransplant CD4 count above this threshold remains to be defined. We evaluated clinical outcomes in patients with baseline CD4 >350 and <350 cells/mm³ among 38 anti–thymocyte globulin (ATG)–treated HIV‐negative to HIV⁺ kidney transplants performed at our center between 2006 and 2013. Median follow‐up was 2.6 years. Rates of acute rejection and patient and graft survival were not different between groups. Occurrence of severe CD4 lymphopenia (<200 cells/mm³), however, was more common among patients with a baseline CD4 count 200–349 cells/mm³ compared with those transplanted at higher counts (75% vs. 30% at 4 weeks [p = 0.04] and 71% vs. 5% at 52 weeks [p = 0.001], respectively, after transplant). After adjusting for age, baseline CD4 count of 200–349 cells/mm³ was an independent predictor of severe CD4 lymphopenia at 4 weeks (relative risk [RR] 2.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3–5.1) and 52 weeks (RR 14.3; 95% CI 2–100.4) after transplant. Patients with CD4 <200 cells/mm³ at 4 weeks had higher probability of serious infections during first 6 months after transplant (19% vs. 50%; log‐rank p = 0.05). These findings suggest that ATG must be used with caution in HIV⁺ kidney allograft recipients with a pretransplant CD4 count <350 cells/mm³.     

Hepatitis B and C virus infections transmitted through organ transplantation investigated by CDC,United States, 2014‐2017

We evaluated clinical outcomes among organ recipients with donor‐derived hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections investigated by CDC from 2014 to 2017 in the United States. We characterized new HBV infections in organ recipients if donors tested negative for total anti‐HBc, HBsAg and HBV DNA, and new recipient HCV infections if donors tested negative for anti‐HCV and HCV RNA. Donor risk behaviors were abstracted from next‐of‐kin interviews and medical records. During 2014‐2017, seven new recipient HBV infections associated with seven donors were identified; six (86%) recipients survived. At last follow‐up, all survivors had functioning grafts and five (83%) had started antiviral therapy. Twenty new recipient HCV infections associated with nine donors were identified; 19 (95%) recipients survived. At last follow‐up, 18 (95%) survivors had functioning grafts and 14 (74%) had started antiviral treatment. Combining donor next‐of kin interviews and medical records, 11/16 (69%) donors had evidence of injection drug use and all met Public Health Service increased risk donor (IRD) criteria. IRD designation led to early diagnosis of recipient infection, and prompt implementation of therapy, likely reducing the risk of graft failure, liver disease, and death.     

Mannose‐Binding Lectin–Deficient Donors Increase the Risk of Bacterial Infection and Bacterial Infection–Related Mortality After Liver Transplantation

Mannose‐binding lectin (MBL) is synthesized by the liver and binds to microbes. MBL2 gene polymorphisms produce intermediate/low/null or normal MBL serum levels (MBL‐deficient or MBL‐sufficient phenotypes, respectively). We aimed to evaluate the incidence and severity of infection, rejection, and survival within 1 year after liver transplantation (LT) according to donor and recipient MBL2 gene polymorphisms. A repeated‐event analysis for infection episodes (negative binomial regression, Andersen–Gill model) was performed in 240 LTs. Four hundred twenty‐eight infectious episodes (310 bacterial, 15 fungal, 65 cytomegalovirus [CMV]‐related, and 38 viral non–CMV‐related episodes) and 48 rejection episodes were recorded. The main bacterial infections were urinary (n = 82, 26%) and pneumonia (n = 69, 22%). LT recipients of MBL‐deficient livers had a higher risk of bacterial infection (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.48 [95% confidence interval 1.04–2.09], p = 0.028), pneumonia (IRR 2.4 [95% confidence interval 1.33–4.33], p = 0.013), and septic shock (IRR 5.62 [95% confidence interval 1.92–16.4], p = 0.002) compared with recipients of MBL‐deficient livers. The 1‐year bacterial infection–related mortality was higher in recipients of MBL‐deficient versus MBL‐sufficient livers (65.8% vs. 56.1%, respectively; p = 0.0097). The incidence of rejection, viral, or fungal infection was similar in both groups. Recipient MBL2 genotype did not significantly increase the risk of bacterial infection. LT recipients of MBL‐deficient livers have a higher risk of bacterial infection, pneumonia, septic shock, and 1‐year bacterial infection–related mortality after LT.