常规与非体外循环下冠状动脉3支病变旁路移植血管通畅性对比分析

目的　评价非体外循环下冠状动脉旁路移植术 (OPCAB)与体外循环下冠状动脉旁路移植术 (CCABG)治疗冠状动脉三支病变术中旁路早期通畅性。方法　 6 0例 3支血管病变的病人分为OPCAB组和CCABG组 ,每组各 30例。行冠状动脉旁路移植术 ,OPCAB组胸骨正中切口 ,在非体外循环心脏不停跳下完成手术 ;CCABG组建立常规体外循环 ,心脏停跳下完成手术。术中应用即时血流测量技术对旁路血管进行流量测量。对比分析两组术前、术后的各项指标及各血管旁路流量、搏动指数和血流波形。结果　两组病人术前一般情况差异无统计学意义。OPCAB组与CCABG组移植旁路血管分别为 (3 6±0 6 )支与 (4 3± 0 9)支 (P <0 0 1) ;两组前降支及右冠状动脉旁路血流量、搏动指数差异无显著性。CCABG组回旋支序贯旁路和远端吻合口多 ,血流量较OPCAB组高。两组弥漫病变血管旁路血流量小。结论　OPCAB与CCABG治疗 3支病变 ,两组血管旁路早期通畅性差异无显著性。     

常规与非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗冠状动脉多支病变的对比分析

目的　评价非体外循环下冠状动脉旁路移植术 (OPCAB)与常规体外循环下冠状动脉旁路移植术(CCABG)相比是否具有优越性。　方法　将 170例 2支以上血管病变行冠状动脉旁路移植术 (不包括瓣膜手术或室壁瘤切除等合并手术的病例 )患者分为 OPCAB组和 CCABG组 ,OPCAB组通过胸骨正中切口 ,在非体外循环心脏不停跳下完成冠状动脉旁路移植术 ;CCABG组建立常规体外循环 ,心脏停搏下完成冠状动脉旁路移植术。对两组病例的术前和术后各项指标进行对比分析。　结果　两组患者术前的一般情况无差异 ,OPCAB组与 CCABG组间曾行溶栓或经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术治疗和 3支病变的比例分别为 31.8%比 18.3%和 5 9%比 78% ,移植旁路血管分别为3.6± 0 .8支比 4.3± 1.0支 (P<0 .0 1) ,但所用的血管材料两组间无差异。OPCAB组术后呼吸机辅助时间和外科住院时间较短 ,住院费用较低 (P<0 .0 5 )。但术后并发症如二次开胸止血、伤口感染、心律失常、围术期心肌梗死、肺部并发症等的发生率 OPCAB组为 9.8% ,CCABG组为 14.6 % ;OPCAB组无手术死亡 ,CCABG组死亡 1例 (P>0 .0 5 )。　结论　 OPCAB治疗冠心病多支病变的初期结果显示可以减少患者术后辅助呼吸时间和外科住院时间 ,降低住院费用。但目前尚不能替代 CCABG,其近、远期效果仍     

糖尿病病人行OPCAB与CCABG的早期结果对比

目的 比较糖尿病病人非体外循环和经典体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植(OPCAB和CCABG)的术后早期临床结果.方法 1999年4月至2008年1月,318例糖尿病病人行冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG).OPCAB 210例,CCABG 108例.两组术前总体情况差异无统计学意义.OPCAB在非体外循环、心脏跳动下完成,CCABG在体外循环、心脏停跳下完成.正中开胸,胸膜外游离带蒂左乳内动脉(LIMA),与左前降支(LAD)吻合,大隐静脉(GSV)与其他靶血管吻合,吻合口超过2个采用序贯吻合.术前口服降糖药或皮下注射胰岛素将血糖控制在6 mmol/L以下,术后早期在ICU时持续泵入胰岛素,将血糖控制在6～8mmol/L.结果 两组共5例(1.57%)死亡,7例(2.20%)发生并发症.两组均达到完全再血管化,平均移植旁路血管OPCAB组(2.6±1.1)支,低于CCABG组的(3.1±1.3)支,P＜0.05.OWCAB组死亡1例(0.48%),明显低于CCABG组4例(3.70%),P＜0.05.OPCAB组发生并发症5例(2.30%),CCABG组2例(1.85%),组间差异无统计学意义,P＞0.05.结论 糖尿病者冠状动脉旁路移植手术围术期严格控制血糖至接近正常水平,住院病死率和并发症率低.OWAB术后早期病死率明显低于CCABG.     

70岁以上病人非体外循环与常规冠状动脉旁路移植术比较

目的　探讨 70岁以上老年病人非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术 (OPCAB)的疗效。方法　比较 78例 70岁以上OPCAB和 32例 70岁以上常规体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术 (CCABG)的临床资料。结果　两组术后桥通畅率均为 10 0 % ,OPCAB和CCABG两组平均住院时间 (9 2 5± 4 0 3)d对(13 18± 7 5 4)d ,平均ICU时间 (2 4 0± 8 5 )h对 (38 5± 2 5 5 )h ,房颤发生率为 8%对 15 %。结论　老年病人有选择的施行OPCAB是一种合理和安全的术式 ,如果可能的话应尽量考虑采用此术式。     

非体外循环与常规冠状动脉旁路移植术后心肌酶的动态变化

目的通过观察非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(OPCAB)与常规冠状动脉旁路移植术(CCABG)患者术后心肌肌钙蛋白I(cTnI)和肌酸激酶同工酶(CK-MB)的动态变化,比较两种手术方式对心肌的损伤情况.方法102例不稳定型心绞痛患者,按不同的手术方式分为OPCAB组和CCABG组.OPCAB组:71例,行OPCAB;CCABG组:31例,行CCABG.两组分别于术前、术后4、12小时、1、3、5天测定cTnI和CK-MB.结果CCABG组行旁路血管移植2～5支(2.97±0.84支),OPCAB组1～5支(2.69±0.92支);两组均无围术期心肌梗死.两组术后早期cTnI和CK-MB均有升高,分别于术后5天和术后3天基本恢复至术前水平.术后4、12小时、术后1天OPCAB组cTnI值与CCABG组比较差别有显著性意义(P<0.01).结论有选择的施行OPCAB是一种安全和合理的手术方式,OPCAB的心肌损伤程度明显轻于CCABG.     

心脏不停跳非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的进展

近年来，随着手术器械的发展，心脏不停跳非体外循环下冠状动脉旁路移植术(OPCAB)逐渐被广泛接受和应用。与常规冠状动脉旁路移植术(CCABG)比较，OPCAB的主要优势为血液中多种炎性介质浓度明显降低，避免了体外循环(CPB)带来的全身系统性炎性损害，减少了并发症，降低了手术死亡率。特别对那些不能采用CPB或采用CPB有风险的高危患者优势更明显。CCABG的手术适应证同样适用于OPCAB，但OPCAB具有相对的禁忌证。OPCAB多采用胸骨正中切口，左前外侧切口适用于左前降支单支病变。OPCAB术后早期结果类似CCABG，但中远期结果有待进一步观察。OPCAB大多数旁路移植血管数低于CCABG，有不能完全再血管化的可能，对OPCAB是否会影响吻合的精确性和旁路血管的长期通畅率有不同意见。OPCAB的优势明确，但仍不能完全替代CCABG，手术的同时应作好CPB准备，必要时改行CCABG。     

1198例非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的早期临床分析

目的　总结分析非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术 (OPCAB)的早期临床结果和经验体会。方法　 1996年 10月至 2 0 0 2年 5月在国内 15个冠心病微创外科中心完成非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术 1198例 ,占同期冠心病手术的 79 5 % ,OPCAB实施率 (即OPCAB占单纯冠状动脉旁路移植术的百分比 )为 85 2 %。年龄平均 (6 1 6± 9 0 )岁 ,男性占 77 3%。 18 7%为左主干病变 ,76 9%为 3支病变。左心室射血分数平均 0 5 6± 0 17。其中二次手术者占 1 5 % ,急诊手术占 9 9%。结果　 2 2例为小切口单支病变旁路移植手术 ,其余均为正中切口、多支病变的OPCAB手术。远端吻合口为 (3 1± 0 9)个 ,乳内动脉桥占 6 5 6 % ,桡动脉桥占 18 0 % ;5 2 %病人使用主动脉内球囊反搏。住院死亡 14例 ,病死率 1 2 %。其中术后心跳骤停或室颤 7例 ,大出血 2例 ,昏迷伴肾功能衰竭 2例 ,大面积脑梗塞 2例 ,呼吸衰竭 1例。并发症中 ,围术期心肌梗死占 0 4% ,急性左心功能衰竭占 0 3% ,严重心律失常占 1 2 % ,呼吸系统并发症占 2 0 % ,器质性神经系统并发症占 1 2 % ,新发或加重的肾功能不全占 0 7% ,出血二次开胸占1 0 % ,胸骨愈合不良占 0 6 %。结论　OPCAB手术安全可行 ,早期效果满意 ,远期效果有待进一步观察。OPCAB具备一     

非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术40例

目的探讨报告非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(OPCAB)的临床应用价值。方法40例患者均在全麻、常温下经胸骨正中切口行OPCAB术,其中单支病变1例,2支病变5例,3支病变16例,4支病变18例。结果全组无手术死亡,平均搭桥3.1支,术后平均呼吸机辅助时间为(8.0±2.5)h。结论对冠状动脉疾病,OPCAB是一种安全,有效的治疗方法。     

体外循环和非体外循环冠状动脉旁路术围手术期心肌损伤程度的对比研究

目的　对比研究常规体外循环下冠状动脉旁路术 (CCABG)和非体外循环心脏跳动下冠状动脉旁路术 (OPCAB)围手术期心肌肌钙蛋白I(cTnI)动态变化规律 ,以明确心肌损伤的程度。方法　 5 9例不稳定心绞痛患者 ,射血分数 (EF) 0 35～ 0 5 6 ,其中 34例行OPCAB ,患者平均年龄 (5 9 1± 1 7)岁 ,平均搭桥数 1 0～ 5 0支 ,平均 (2 90± 0 8)支 ;2 5例行CCABG ,患者平均年龄 (5 6 5± 1 8)岁。搭桥数 2 0～ 5 0支 ,平均 (3 2± 0 7)支。分别在术前 ,术后第 8、2 4、48、72、96、12 0h时 ,采集患者静脉血标本 ,离心后取血浆测定cTnI值。cTnI的测定采用自动双抗体夹心酶联免疫荧光测定法 ,仪器检测灵敏度cTnI 0 35 μg/L。　 结果　术前 2组患者cTnI差异无显著性意义 (P >0 0 5 )。OPCAB手术组cTnI值在术后观察期内均低于CCABG组 ,差异有显著性意义 (t=1 9432 ,P =0 0 0 7)。全组患者无死亡 ,均痊愈出院。　结论　cTnI是诊断心肌损伤的良好指标。OPCAB手术心肌损伤程度显著低于CCABG手术。     

体外和非体外循环对冠状动脉搭桥术疗效的影响

目的 :对比分析 63例非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术 (OPCAB)和 87例常规体外循环下冠状动脉搭桥术 (CCABG)的疗效。方法 :对 15 0例冠状动脉搭桥术的疗效进行回顾性分析。结果 :两组均无手术死亡 ;OPCAB组在ICU时间、呼吸机辅助呼吸时间方面优于CCABG组 ;但两组术后均无心绞痛复发。结论 :OPCAB和CCABG均安全可行 ,疗效确实 ;OP CAB与CCABG相比 ,虽有一定优势 ,但不能取代CCABG。     

Mortality and morbidity among patients who undergo combined valve and coronary artery bypass surgery: Early and late results

Aim: To describe mortality and morbidity early and late after combined valve surgery and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) as compared with CABG alone. Patients and methods: All patients from western Sweden in whom CABG in combination with valve surgery or CABG alone was carried out in 1988–1991. Results: Among 2116 patients who underwent CABG, 35 (2%) had this combined with mitral valve surgery and 134 (6%) had this combined with aortic valve surgery, whereas the remaining 92% underwent CABG alone. Patients who underwent combined valve surgery and CABG were older, included more women and had a higher prevalence of previous congestive heart failure and renal dysfunction but on the other hand a less severe coronary artery disease. Among patients who underwent mitral valve surgery in combination with CABG the mortality over the subsequent 5 years was 45%. The corresponding figure for patients who underwent aortic valve surgery in combination with CABG was 24%. Both were higher than for CABG alone (14%; P<0.0001 and P=0.003, respectively). In a stepwise multiple regression model mitral valve surgery in combination with CABG was found to be an independent significant predictor for death but aortic valve surgery in combination with CABG was not. Among patients who underwent mitral valve surgery in combination with CABG and were discharged alive from hospital 77% were rehospitalized during the 2 years following the operation as compared with 48% among patients who underwent aortic valve surgery in combination with CABG and 43% among patients with CABG alone. Multiple regression identified mitral valve surgery in combination with CABG as a significant independent predictor for rehospitalization but not aortic valve plus CABG. Conclusion: Among patients who either underwent CABG in combination with mitral valve surgery or aortic valve surgery or CABG alone, mitral valve surgery in combination with CABG was independently associated with death and rehospitalization, but the combination of aortic valve surgery and CABG was not.     

连续170例冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗冠心病

目的 回顾应用冠状动脉旁路移植术（ＣＡＢＧ）治疗冠心病的早期效果和经验。方法 １７０例（男１５２例,女１８例;年龄３５－８０岁,平均６６．７岁）冠心病病人中９７％为多支冠状动脉病变。８１例左室射血分数≤４５％,其中２１例〈３０％。８４％病人心绞痛ＣＣＳⅢ－Ⅳ级。除１例在左前外侧小切口非体外循环下手术,余均为正中开胸低温体外循环下ＣＡＢＧ。     

肾功能不全患者行冠状动脉旁路移植术的长期随访结果

目的 分析估测肾小球滤过率(eGFR)<60 ml/(min·1.73 m~2)的患者冠状动脉旁路移植术后的长期随访结果.方法 回顾性分析1999年1月至2003年9月3371例冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的临床资料,用 Cockcroft-Gault公式计算eGFR,根据eGFR将患者分为肾功能不全组[eGFR<60 ml/(min·1.73 m~2),n=649]肾功能正常组[eGFR>=60 ml/(min·1.73 m~2),n=2722],比较两组患者的近远期随访结果.结果 肾功能不全组的住院病死率和随访4年病死率分别为2.77%和6.81%,明显高于肾功能正常组.肾功能不全组的其他围手术期并发症及远期不良事件发生率也明 显高于肾功能正常组.多因素 COX 回归分析结果显示,eGFR<60 ml/(rain·1.73 m~2)是冠状动脉旁 路移植术后远期死亡的独立危险因素(HR=1.948,95% CI:1.357-2.797,P<0.01).结论 eGFR <60 ml/(min·1.73 m~2)是冠状动脉旁路移植术的独立危险因素.     

Initial experience with beating heart surgery: comparison with fast-track methods.

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) may increase postoperative complications in high-risk patients. The goal of this study is to retrospectively review a series of consecutive patients undergoing conventional CABG using a fast-track recovery method and to compare this series with the initial series of patients undergoing beating heart surgery using either the single-vessel minimally invasive approach or the off-pump multivessel bypass technique with a median sternotomy. One hundred fifty-eight consecutive patients underwent CABG. One hundred four patients underwent conventional CABG using CPB with a short-pump fast-track recovery method (Group A). Twenty-nine patients underwent a single-vessel bypass via a left anterior thoracotomy off pump [Group B, minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB)]. Twenty-five patients underwent multivessel CABG with a median sternotomy off pump (Group C). Short-pump fast-track (Group A) patients exhibited minimal complications and expedient recovery and received extensive revascularization. Off-pump multivessel patients (Group C) received fewer bypass grafts, had more preoperative comorbidity, and recovered as quickly as lower-risk fast-track short-pump patients (Group A). Single-vessel off-pump patients (Group B, MIDCAB) were younger elective patients and demonstrated no recovery advantage. The overall mortality was 1.8 per cent. The conversion rates from beating heart surgery to CPB for groups B and C were 10.3 and 16 per cent, respectively. The postoperative hospital length of stay for groups A, B, and C were 4.8+/-2.4, 3.9+/-1.8, and 5.2+/-2.3 days, respectively. Eliminating CPB is not as important as reducing exposure for minimizing operative risk. Beating heart surgery is an adjunct to conventional CABG with CPB. The off-pump multivessel bypass technique is best suited for high-risk patients requiring three grafts or fewer, whereas MIDCAB is best suited for single-vessel bypass that cannot be managed using interventional percutaneous techniques; however, the recovery advantage with MIDCAB is not apparent. Patients requiring more than three bypass grafts should undergo conventional CABG with CPB.     

Off-pump multivessel coronary artery surgery in high-risk patients

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery bypass surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, which may be more marked in high-risk patients. We evaluated our results of off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) in high-risk patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and compared them with results in similar patients who underwent operation on cardiopulmonary bypass. METHODS: A total of 1,075 patients who underwent OPCAB between October 1996 and June 2001 and who had one or more of the following risk factors were included in the study: poor left ventricular function (EF < or = 30%), advanced age (> 70 years), left main stenosis, acute myocardial infarction, and redo coronary artery surgery. These patients were compared with 2,312 similar patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting on cardiopulmonary bypass during the same period. Preoperative risk factors, intraoperative variables, and postoperative results were analyzed and compared between two groups. RESULTS: The average number of grafts was 3.0 +/- 0.4 and 3.2 +/- 0.3 in the off-pump (OPCAB) and on-pump (CCAB) groups, respectively. Hospital mortality was 3.2% and 4.5% in OPCAB and CCAB groups respectively (p = 0.109). Perioperative myocardial infarction, requirement of inotropic agents, stroke, and renal dysfunction were comparable in two groups. Intubation time (19 +/- 5 vs 24 +/- 6 hours, p < 0.001), mean blood loss (362 +/- 53 vs 580 +/- 66 mL, p < 0.001), atrial fibrillation (14.3 vs 19.7%, p < 0.001), and prolonged ventilation (4.6 vs 7.6%, p = 0.002) were less in OPCAB group. Intensive care unit stay (20 +/- 8 hours) and hospital stay (6 +/- 3 days) were significantly less in the OPCAB group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Off-pump coronary artery surgery can be safely performed in high-risk patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. Operative mortality is comparable to that associated with on-pump surgery, and avoidance of cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with reduced postoperative morbidity in these patients.     

Combining off pump coronary artery bypass with mitral valve replacement

Background Conventional approach to combined coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and mitral valve replacement (MVR) is associated with longer cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and aortic cross clamp (ACC) time leading to high operative risk. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of nine consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting/mitral valve replacement combining the off pump technique with cardioplegic arrest. Elective intra aortic balloon pump (IABP) support was instituted in all cases. CABG was first done in all cases without cardiopulmonary bypass support. Mitral valve replacement was then done using conventional cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest using the superior septal approach. Results Nine consecutive patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting with mitral valve replacement including three patients with acute myocardial infarction. Preoperative echocardiogram revealed a mean ejection fraction (EF) of 38.4 ± 6.0%. Intra aortic balloon pump was inserted in all patients preoperatively. The average number of grafts were 3.0 ± 0.7. Eight patients received bioprosthetic valve while one patient received mechanical prosthesis. The average length of stay in intensive care unit was 3.3 ± 0.5 days. There was no mortality. One patient had superficial wound infection. Conclusion The data suggest that the combined technique (off pump coronary artery bypass grafting and conventional mitral valve replacement) is a safe method to perform coronary artery bypass grafting/mitral valve replacement with minimal morbidity and mortality.     

Closed endarterectomy for diffuse right coronary artery disease: early results with angiographic controls

BACKGROUND: Due to reported high morbidity and mortality, surgeons tend not to endarterectomize the diffusely diseased right coronary artery. Most prefer not to bypass this artery in such situation. We compared the endarterectomized right coronary patients with patients having total occlusion of right coronary artery not needing endarterectomy who received right coronary artery (RCA) bypass. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between August 1998 and May 2000, 1226 patients had coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) at Alkan Hospital, of whom 59 had right coronary artery endarterectomy (REC) along with RCA bypass with saphenous vein graft. We compared the results of 59 RCE patients with 50 patients who underwent RCA bypass without RCE. RESULTS: Compared with the control group, the RCE group had a higher incidence of diabetes. There were no statistically significant differences between groups for mortality and morbidity. Among postoperative variables only the cross-clamp time was longer for the RCE group (33.5 +/- 10 min vs. 27.3 +/- 8 min, p < 0.05). Surviving patients were followed for a mean period of 7 +/- 5 months. No recurrence of angina occurred during the follow-up. Control angiography at the sixth month was performed on 42 RCE patients accepting the procedure, and all grafts were found patent. CONCLUSION: Endarterectomy for diffusely atherosclerotic right coronary artery for selected patients did not bring additional mortality and morbidity to the CABG procedure, and short term clinical and angiographic results were excellent.     

Combined carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with asymptomatic high-grade stenoses: an analysis of 758 procedures

PURPOSE: Surgical treatment of hemodynamically significant carotid artery stenoses has been well documented, especially in the asymptomatic patient. However, in those patients presenting with hemodynamically significant asymptomatic carotid artery disease who are to undergo cardiac surgery, optimal treatment remains controversial. In this study, we analyze our experience with patients who underwent synchronous carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and coronary artery bypass graft procedures (CABG) for hemodynamically significant (>70%) asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis and coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: Demographics and outcomes of all patients undergoing synchronous CEA/CABG for asymptomatic carotid stenosis between April 1980 and January 2005 were reviewed from our vascular registry and patient charts. We included patients who underwent standard patching of their carotid artery and those undergoing eversion CEA. All neurologic events within the first 30 days that persisted >24 hours were considered a stroke. For purposes of comparison, we also reviewed outcomes for patients undergoing synchronous CEA/CABG for symptomatic carotid stenosis. RESULTS: Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (>70%) was the indication in 702 patients (276 women and 426 men) undergoing 758 CEAs. In the asymptomatic group, 22 patients, of which 21 succumbed to cardiac dysfunction, and one died from a hemorrhagic stroke. The overall mortality rate was 3.1%. Seven permanent nonfatal neurologic deficits occurred in this series (1 woman, 6 men). The combined stroke mortality was 4.3%. This compares to a 30-day stroke mortality of 6.1% in 132 symptomatic combined CEA/CABG patients. The difference in stroke mortality in women compared with men was not significant. CONCLUSION: In this experience, patients presenting with hemodynamically significant (>70%) asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis can undergo synchronous CEA/CABG with low morbidity and mortality.