Alternative treatments for patients with chronic C hepatitis who did not respond previous treatments

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C (HCV) has improved during the last decade with peg Interferon ribavirin (peg IFN-riba) increasing sustained viral response from 6 to 60%. Even though, there is an increasing number of non responding patients that constitutes up to 50% of HCV in referral centers nowdays. This is an heterogenous group for diverse reasons (failure of response to monotherapies, premature drop outs) some of them biologic (genotype I, high viral load, advanced fibrosis, insulin resistance, genetic predisposicition, pharmacologic metabolism) requiring an individualized approach. Unfortunately no new drugs are expected for clinical use before the year 2010. Greater dosages or further prolonged treatments with peg IFN-riba induce remission in up to 60% of these patients. Others require pre-treatment support (antidepresives, eritropoyetin, granulocyte stimulating factor). It is important to establish the goals of treatment: viral eradication or diminish viral load for prevention of complications. Hence it is important to select the group of these patients with greater chances to respond to a second treatment, such as patients with genotypes 2-3, low viral load, failures to monotherapies, recurrences to any treatment, partial responders or those whom had incomplete treatments. Different approach require those that had no response to peg IFN-riba where treatment should be reserved for those with greater risk factors. These need induction regimens with higher dosages during the first 20 weeks and then longer treatment (18-24 months). All of these measures not always eradicate HCV, but do slow fibrosis and its complications: liver failure, portal hypertension and hepatocarcinoma.     

Maintenance therapy with ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C who fail to respond to combination therapy with interferon alfa and ribavirin

To assess the efficacy and safety of maintenance therapy with ribavirin alone in chronic hepatitis C, 108 patients were treated with the combination of interferon alfa and ribavirin for 24 weeks; those who failed to have a virologic response were offered enrollment in a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of ribavirin (1,000-1,200 mg daily) versus placebo for the subsequent 48 weeks. Patients were monitored at regular intervals with symptom questionnaires, serum aminotransferase levels, hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA levels, and complete blood counts and underwent liver biopsy at the completion of therapy. Among 108 patients, 50 were still HCV RNA positive after 24 weeks of treatment, of whom 34 agreed to be randomized to continue either ribavirin monotherapy or placebo. Among 17 patients who received placebo, there was no overall improvement in symptoms, serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, HCV RNA levels, or hepatic histology. Among the 17 patients who received ribavirin, serum ALT levels and necroinflammatory features of liver histology were improved, whereas symptoms, HCV RNA levels, and hepatic fibrosis scores were not changed significantly from baseline. Responses to ribavirin seemed to be categorical, such that 8 patients (47%) had definite improvement in liver histology. Patients with improved histology had improvements in serum ALT levels both on combination therapy and after switching to ribavirin monotherapy. In conclusion, continuation of ribavirin monotherapy may maintain serum biochemical improvements that occur during interferon-ribavirin combination therapy in some patients and that these improvements are often associated with decreases in necroinflammatory changes in the liver. Whether these improvements will ultimately result in prevention of progression of hepatitis C requires further study.     

Interferon and ribavirin in HIV-negative haemophiliacs with chronic hepatitis C who were nonresponders to a previous interferon treatment

Between January 1999 and December 2001, 33 HIV-negative haemophiliacs with interferon-nonresponsive chronic hepatitis C were treated with interferon (IFN) alpha2b (5 MU three times weekly) and ribavirin (1-1.2 g daily) for 12 months. Four patients (12.1%) dropped out of the study due to adverse effects. At the end of therapy, normalization of ALT occurred in 14/33 treated patients (42.4%) and HCV-RNA was cleared in 12 (36.4%). Eleven patients (33.3%) became sustained responders. Genotype 1 was the only factor associated with a poor response to therapy (P < 0.001). Our study shows that IFN and ribavirin combination therapy is effective in HIV-negative chronically HCV-infected haemophiliacs who do not respond to a previous IFN treatment.     

Retreatment for 24 vs 48 weeks with interferon-alpha2b plus ribavirin of chronic hepatitis C patients who relapsed or did not respond to interferon alone

We assessed the efficacy of interferon (IFN) plus ribavirin over 24 or 48 weeks for the retreatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C who had relapsed or did not respond to a previous course of IFN. One-hundred and twenty patients (69 non-responders and 51 relapsers) were randomly assigned to receive IFN-alpha2b (3 million units thrice weekly) plus ribavirin (1,000-1,200 mg per day) for 24 weeks (group A: 58 patients) or 48 weeks (group B: 62 patients). Treatment was discontinued at week 12 if the alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level remained elevated. The rate of sustained response was 15.5% in group A and 37.1% in group B (P = 0.013). Relapsers treated for 48 weeks had a sustained response rate of 66.6% compared with a sustained response rate of only 25% in those treated for 24 weeks (P = 0.004). Moreover, a sustained response was seen in 14.3% of non-responders treated for 48 weeks and in 8.8% of those treated for 24 weeks (P = 0.71). Fifty-three per cent of patients with a normal ALT level and undetectable hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA at week 12 had a sustained response compared with 14% of those who were HCV RNA positive at week 12 (P < 0.001). Independent predictive factors of sustained response were: therapy for 48 weeks (P = 0.0026), relapse after IFN treatment (P = 0.0006), loss of HCV RNA at week 12 (P = 0.0008) and HCV genotype non-1 (P = 0.024). Hence, in patients with chronic hepatitis C who failed to respond to a previous course of IFN monotherapy, combination therapy with IFN plus ribavirin for 48 weeks seems to be more effective than IFN plus ribavirin for 24 weeks.     

Consensus interferon and ribavirin for patients with chronic hepatitis C and failure of previous interferon-alpha therapy.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of consensus interferon (CIFN), a synthetic IFN with optimised in vitro activity, was assessed in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients who had failed the pretreatment with interferon-alpha (IFNalpha) and ribavirin. METHODS: One hundred and three patients after non-response (n=69) or relapse (n=34) to IFNalpha+/-ribavirin were randomly assigned to high-dose induction (CIFN 27-->9 microg daily for 24 weeks, 9 microg t.i.w. for 24 weeks) or low-dose treatment (CIFN 18 microg t.i.w. for 12 weeks, 9 microg t.i.w. for 36 weeks); each with ribavirin 800 mg/day. Follow-up was 24 weeks. RESULTS: Non-responder patients treated with high-dose induction had higher early virological response rates (63% vs. 39%, P<0.05). This initial positive effect was lost during the last 24 weeks of treatment yielding sustained virological response (SVR) rates of 26% in both groups. Relapse patients revealed SVR in 70% and 38% in groups A and B (NS). Treatment was well tolerated with side effect-related preterm discontinuations in 8% and 5%. CONCLUSIONS: CIFN and ribavirin treatment induced considerable SVR rates in patients with non-response or relapse to IFNalpha+/-ribavirin. Viral elimination rates might be further increased by continuous daily administration of CIFN and weight-adjusted ribavirin dosing.     

Interferon alpha-2B and ribavirin in combination for patients with chronic hepatitis C who failed to respond to, or relapsed after, interferon alpha therapy: a randomized trial.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin in combination in the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C who had either failed to respond to therapy with interferon alpha (nonresponders), or who had relapsed after interferon therapy (relapsers). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Four hundred patients with chronic hepatitis C (200 nonresponders and 200 relapsers) were randomly assigned in equal numbers to receive either subcutaneous administration of recombinant interferon alpha-2b (3 million units three times per week) and ribavirin (1,000 to 1,200 mg/daily orally) or interferon alpha-2b alone (6 million units three times per week). Both ribavirin and interferon alpha-2b were given for 24 weeks. The patients were then followed for an additional 24 weeks. RESULTS: At the end of the treatment period, normalization of serum alanine aminotransferase levels and absence of hepatitis C virus RNA were seen in 21% of nonresponders and in 39% of relapsers who were treated with interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin, compared with 5% of nonresponders (P = 0.001) and 9% of relapsers treated with interferon alpha-2b alone (P <0.001). At the end of follow-up, 14% of nonresponders and 30% of relapsers treated with the combination therapy had a sustained response, compared with 1% of nonresponders (P = 0.001) and 5% of relapsers treated with interferon alpha alone (P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A 24-week course of treatment with interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin offers a chance of sustained response, whereas retreatment with interferon alpha-2b alone does not give satisfactory results. The role of long-term therapy in inducing prolonged remission remains to be explored.     

Sustained response to combination therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C who failed to respond to interferon

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The best treatment for chronic hepatitis C patients who do not respond to interferon is still unknown. Reported rates of response to treatment vary as the result of heterogeneous definitions of non-responders and small study size. METHODS: One hundred nineteen hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA-positive non-responders to high-dose interferon monotherapy received alpha-interferon, 5 MU tiw plus oral ribavirin, 1000-1200 mg/day for 48 weeks (Group A, n=74) or alpha-interferon, 5 MU daily for 4 weeks, followed by 5 MU tiw plus oral ribavirin, 1000-1200 mg/day for 44 weeks (Group B, n=45) according to the Institution where they were followed. Persistently normal alanine aminotransferase and negative HCV RNA up to 72 weeks from treatment onset defined a sustained response. RESULTS: Eighteen patients discontinued treatment (13 developed anemia, two mucositis, one granulocytopenia; two were dropouts), none for serious adverse events. There were 24 (20%) sustained responders, with similar final response rates in Groups A and B. Sustained response was more frequent in patients aged 相似文献   

Peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD) plus ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C patients who failed previous interferon therapy

BACKGROUND: The management of patients with chronic hepatitis C who have relapsed or failed to respond to interferon based therapies is an important issue facing hepatologists. AIMS: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD) plus ribavirin in this population by conducting a multicentre open label study. PATIENTS: Data from adults with detectable serum hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA who had not responded or had relapsed after previous conventional interferon or conventional interferon/ribavirin combination therapy were analysed. METHODS: Patients were retreated with peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD) 180 microg/week plus ribavirin 800 mg/day for 24 or 48 weeks at the investigators' discretion. The study was conceived before the optimal dose of ribavirin (1000/1200 mg/day) for patients with genotype 1 was known. The primary endpoint was sustained virological response (SVR), defined as undetectable HCV RNA (<50 IU/ml) after 24 weeks of follow up. The analysis was conducted by intention to treat. RESULTS: A total of 312 patients (212 non-responders, 100 relapsers) were included. Of these, 28 patients were treated for 24 weeks and 284 for 48 weeks. Baseline characteristics between non-responders and relapsers were similar although more non-responders had genotype 1 infection (87% v 69%). Overall SVR rates were 23% (48/212) for non-responders and 41% (41/100) for relapsers. When data were analysed by genotype, SVR rates were 24% (61/253) in genotype 1 and 47% (28/59) in genotype 2/3. CONCLUSIONS: These results in a large patient cohort demonstrate that it is possible to cure a proportion of previous non-responders and relapsers by retreating with peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD) plus ribavirin.     

Iron depletion is not effective in inducing a virologic response in patients with chronic hepatitis C who failed to respond to interferon therapy

OBJECTIVE: Some studies have suggested that increased iron stores may impact negatively on the response to interferon in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection. We performed this prospective trial to determine the effects of iron depletion on ALT and HCV-RNA levels in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection and to assess whether the response to interferon in patients who had previously failed to respond to interferon was enhanced by iron depletion. METHODS: Patients with chronic hepatitis C resistant to interferon therapy and no evidence of iron overload underwent weekly phlebotomies until the serum ferritin level was below lower limits of normal for the subject's age and sex. Patients were then started on interferon-alpha2b, 3 million units subcutaneously three times per week for a period of 24 weeks. Iron studies, ALT, and HCV-RNA levels were monitored at baseline, after phlebotomy and at 12 and 24 weeks of interferon therapy. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were enrolled, 28 completed the study. A mean of 7.2 units of blood were removed to achieve iron depletion. ALT levels decreased significantly with phlebotomy (142 IU/L before phlebotomy vs 82 IU/L after phlebotomy; p < 0.001), but log HCV-RNA levels remained unchanged (6.49 before phlebotomy vs 6.51 after phlebotomy). Interferon therapy did not improve ALT levels further. HCV-RNA levels were minimally reduced during interferon therapy (log HCV-RNA 6.49 before interferon vs 6.00 after 24 weeks of interferon therapy). Two patients achieved a virologic end of treatment response, both relapsed within 3 months after discontinuation of interferon. No patient achieved a sustained virologic response. CONCLUSIONS: In patients who previously failed treatment with interferon, iron depletion induced by phlebotomy improves ALT levels but is ineffective in achieving viral eradication in patients retreated with interferon 3 million units three times per week.     

Interferon and ribavirin versus interferon and amantadine in interferon nonresponders with chronic hepatitis C

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the potential efficacy and safety of a combination of interferon and ribavirin with that of interferon and amantadine in patients who had previously failed to respond to interferon monotherapy. METHODS: A total of 29 patients were randomized to 3 million units of alpha-interferon three times weekly with 1000 mg of ribavirin daily (group A, n = 14) or an identical dose of alpha-interferon and amantadine hydrochloride given in a dose of 200 mg daily (group B, n = 15). Patients were treated for 24 wk and observed for 24 wk posttreatment. RESULTS: The treatment groups were evenly matched with respect to gender, frequency of genotype 1, presence of fibrosis, as well as baseline alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and HCV RNA levels. At the end of therapy, five of 14 or 36% of patients in group A versus 0 of 15 in group B had both normal serum ALT and nondetectable HCV RNA by polymerase chain reaction (p = 0.017). A complete response was sustained, however, in only two of 13 patients (15%) in group A who completed 24 wk of observation posttreatment. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of interferon nonresponders have an end-of-treatment biochemical and virological response to a combination of interferon and ribavirin, and sustained responses are possible. The addition of amantadine to interferon, in contrast, does not seem to enhance the antiviral effectiveness of interferon in patients who have previously failed to respond.     

Triple therapy of interferon and ribavirin with zinc supplementation for patients with chronic hepatitis C： A randomized controlled clinical trial

AIM: To study the therapeutic effect of interferon (IFN) and ribavirin with zinc supplement on patients with chronic hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection. METHODS: A total of 102 patients confirmed histologically to have chronic HCV infection with genotype 1b and more than 100 KIU/mL of HCV were randomly assigned to each arm of the study and each received 10 million units of pegylated interferon (IFN-alpha-2b) daily for 4 wk followed by the same dose every other day for 20 wk plus ribavirin (600 or 800 mg/d depending on body weight), with or without polaprezinc (150 mg/d) orally for 24 wk. The primary endpoint was sustained virological response (SVR) defined as negative HCV-RNA in the serum 6 mo after treatment. RESULTS: There were no differences in the clinical background between the two groups except for more females in the dual therapy group than in the other group (P<0.05). SVR was observed in 33.3% of the triple therapy group and 33.3% of the dual therapy group. The side effects were almost the same in both groups except for gastrointestinal symptoms, which were less in the triple therapy group (P=0.019). CONCLUSION: Considered together, triple therapy of zinc plus IFN and ribavirin for HCV infection patients with genotype 1b and high viral load is not better than dual therapy except for lower incidence of gastrointestinal side effects.     

Long-term re-treatment with interferon and ribavirin combination therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C who are non-responders to interferon alone: a preliminary study.

We evaluated the efficacy and tolerance of ribavirin and IFN-alpha combination therapy over 12 months in 28 patients who were non-responders to IFN-alpha alone. Of 24 patients who have finished the therapy, 6 (25%) obtained a complete response (normal ALT and negative HCV RNA) at the end of treatment and maintained a sustained response 27% (5/18).     

Interferon versus ribavirin plus interferon in chronic hepatitis C previously resistant to interferon: a randomized trial

Abstract: Background: More than 70% of patients with chronic hepatitis C are resistant to interferon therapy. Ribavirin, in association with interferon, has been demonstrated as effective, at a dose of 800–1200 mg/day, but the efficacy of a lower dose has not been established. Methods: We assessed the effectiveness of the combination of 600mg/day of ribavirin plus 3 MU of interferon over a period of 6 months, in a group of patients previously resistant to interferon. Sixty-two patients with chronic hepatitis C with serum and hepatic HCV RNA relapsers or non-responders to interferon, were randomly divided into two groups: group A received 3 MU of interferon alpha-2b, three times a week for 6 months; group B was given the same dose plus 600 mg per day of ribavirin for 6 months. Two patients from each group dropped from therapy. One patient from group A and two from group B withdrew from treatment because of adverse effects. Results: Mean alanine aminotransferase levels were similar in both groups throughout the study. A sustained response was observed in 7% and 7.4% of groups A and B with short-term response in 39% and 59%, and no response in 54% and 34% from both groups respectively (nonsignificant). At 12 months, 4 and 7 patients from groups A and B respectively, cleared serum HCV RNA however, only one sustained responder from each group cleared HCV RNA from peripheral blood mononuclear cells. At 18 months, 3 patients remained serum HCV RNA negative. Adverse effects were similar. Only haemoglobin values were lower in group B in the first month of therapy (p<0.05). Conclusion: In conclusion, the combination of 3 MU of interferon plus 600 mg of ribavirin is not effective in chronic hepatitis C resistant to interferon.     

Predictive factors for interferon and ribavirin combination therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C

AIM： To confirm the predictive factors for interferon （IFN）-α and ribavirin combination therapy for chronic hepatitis patients with hepatitis C virus （HCV） genotype lb. METHODS： HCV RNA from 50 patients infected with HCV genotype lb was studied by cloning and sequencing of interferon sensitivity determining region （ISDR）, PKR- eIF2α phosphorylation homology domain （PePHD）. Patients were treated with IFN-α and ribavirin for 6 mo and grouped by effectiveness of the therapy. A variety of factors were analyzed. RESULTS： Our data showed that age, HCV RNA titer, and ISDR type could be used as the predictive factors for combined IFN-α and ribavirin efficacy. Characteristically, mutations in PePHD appeared only when the combination therapy was effective. Other factors, such as sex and alanine aminotransferase （ALT） level, were not related to its efficacy. Adjusting for age and HCV RNA titer indicated that the ISDR type was the most potent predictive factor. CONCLUSION： HCV RNA ISDR type is an important factor for predicting efficacy of IFN-α and ribavirin combination therapy in Korean patients.     

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C in patients who have failed to respond to IFN or IFN and ribavirin combination therapy

Approximately 45% of patients with chronic hepatitis C infection fail to achieve a sustained virologic response when treated with pegylated interferon (IFN) and ribavirin combination therapy. The lack of early virologic response after 12 to 24 weeks of therapy can be a reliable indicator of those who will not benefit from continuing the treatment for 48 weeks. The presence of genotype 1, high viral load, and advanced fibrosis are among the factors that can predict those patients who have higher rates of nonresponse. Nonresponders to IFN monotherapy and IFN plus ribavirin combination therapy can benefit from retreatment with pegylated IFN and ribavirin combination therapy. Treatment options for nonresponders to pegylated IFN and ribavirin are being investigated in several trials. The role of maintenance pegylated IFN is also under investigation, although preliminary evidence suggests that some patients may derive benefit.     

Management of chronic hepatitis C patients who have relapsed or not responded to pegylated interferon alfa plus ribavirin

Summary.  Development of therapeutic strategies for patients with chronic hepatitis C who experience virological breakthrough, relapse or nonresponse lag behind those for treatment-naïve patients. The probability of a previously treated patient responding to re-treatment depends on the nature of the previous regimen, the magnitude of the response to previous treatment and the patient's characteristics. Relapsers have higher sustained virological response rates than nonresponders when re-treated with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin. Re-treatment of nonresponders to pegylated interferon plus ribavirin with the standard 48-week regimen resulted in an approximate 6% sustained response rate in the EPIC-3 program. In the REPEAT trial, the sustained response rate was significantly higher in nonresponders to pegylated interferon alfa-2b (12 kD) plus ribavirin randomized to 72 weeks of peginterferon alfa-2a (40 kD) plus ribavirin, compared with a 48-week regimen (16% vs 8%, P  = 0.0006). Based on available data, extended treatment is the best option for these individuals. Undetectable viral RNA at week 12 is an important criterion for re-treatment in the REPEAT and EPIC studies. Maintenance therapy with pegylated interferon is generally ineffective in nonresponders and cannot be recommended. Directly acting antivirals may increase response rates and the burden of adverse events when combined with the standard of care, but will not be available for some years. In conclusion, after careful evaluation of an individual's benefit–risk ratio, a 72-week regimen is the preferred strategy for optimizing sustained response rates in patients who have not responded to the standard of care, provided that viral RNA is undetectable at week 12 of re-treatment.     

HCV RNA levels during therapy with amantadine in addition to interferon and ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C patients with previous nonresponse or response/relapse to interferon and ribavirin

Interferon (IFN) alpha in combination with ribavirin (RIB) is standard therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. However, many patients do not respond with sustained HCV clearance to this therapy. At present, no accepted treatment strategy exists for these patients. Recent preliminary data have suggested that amantadine (AMA) is effective against HCV infection. In a pilot study, we treated 13 nonresponders and 10 response/ relapsers to previous IFN/RIB therapy with AMA 200 mg per day in combination with IFN 3 MU thrice weekly, and RIB 1000 mg per day for 24 weeks, with a 24-week follow-up period after end-of-treatment. At the end-of-treatment, 1 previous nonresponder and 5 previous response/relapsers were HCV RNA negative. At the end of follow-up, only 1 previous response/relapser remained HCV RNA negative and had a sustained response. During therapy, serum HCV RNA became undetectable in 4 previous nonresponders, of whom 3 had a breakthrough at week 24. Twenty-one patients continued therapy without dose reductions. One patient discontinued therapy prematurely due to sleeping disturbances, and another patient was withdrawn from therapy due to heavy alcohol intake. We conclude that the addition of AMA to IFN and RIB was well tolerated but had little, if any, impact on HCV RNA eradication in nonresponders or response/relapsers to previous IFN/RIB combination therapy.     

Interferon versus ribavirin plus interferon in chronic hepatitis C previously resistant to interferon: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: More than 70% of patients with chronic hepatitis C are resistant to interferon therapy. Ribavirin, in association with interferon, has been demonstrated as effective, at a dose of 800-1200 mg/day, but the efficacy of a lower dose has not been established. METHODS: We assessed the effectiveness of the combination of 600 mg/day of ribavirin plus 3 MU of interferon over a period of 6 months, in a group of patients previously resistant to interferon. Sixty-two patients with chronic hepatitis C with serum and hepatic HCV RNA relapsers or non-responders to interferon, were randomly divided into two groups: group A received 3 MU of interferon alpha-2b, three times a week for 6 months; group B was given the same dose plus 600 mg per day of ribavirin for 6 months. Two patients from each group dropped from therapy. One patient from group A and two from group B withdrew from treatment because of adverse effects. RESULTS: Mean alanine aminotransferase levels were similar in both groups throughout the study. A sustained response was observed in 7% and 7.4% of groups A and B with short-term response in 39% and 59%, and no response in 54% and 34% from both groups respectively (non-significant). At 12 months, 4 and 7 patients from groups A and B respectively, cleared serum HCV RNA however, only one sustained responder from each group cleared HCV RNA from peripheral blood mononuclear cells. At 18 months, 3 patients remained serum HCV RNA negative. Adverse effects were similar. Only haemoglobin values were lower in group B in the first month of therapy (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the combination of 3 MU of interferon plus 600 mg of ribavirin is not effective in chronic hepatitis C resistant to interferon.