Nickel allergy as risk factor for hand eczema: a population-based study

Summary Background In population‐based studies using self‐reported nickel allergy, a hand eczema prevalence of 30–43% has been reported in individuals with nickel allergy. In a previous Swedish study, 958 schoolgirls were patch tested for nickel. In a questionnaire follow up 20 years later no association was found between nickel allergy and hand eczema. Objectives To investigate further the relation between nickel allergy and hand eczema. Methods Three hundred and sixty‐nine women, still living in the same geographical area, now aged 30–40 years, were patch tested and clinically investigated regarding hand eczema. Results Patch testing showed 30·1% nickel‐positive individuals. The adjusted prevalence proportion ratio (PPR) for hand eczema after age 15 years in relation to nickel patch test results was 1·03 (95% confidence interval, CI 0·71–1·50). A history of childhood eczema was reported by 35·9%, and the PPR for hand eczema in relation to childhood eczema was 3·68 (95% CI 2·45–5·54). When analysing the relation separately in women with and without a history of childhood eczema a statistical interaction was found. The hand eczema risk was doubled in nickel‐positive women without a history of childhood eczema, with a PPR of 2·23 (95% CI 1·10–4·49) for hand eczema after age 15 years. Conclusions A doubled risk for hand eczema was found in nickel‐positive women without a history of childhood eczema. When analysing all participants, there was no statistically significant difference between nickel‐positive and nickel‐negative women regarding occurrence of hand eczema. The most important risk factor for hand eczema was childhood eczema. The risk for hand eczema in nickel‐positive women may previously have been overestimated.     

Self-diagnosed dermatitis in adults. Results from a population survey in Stockholm

In a population-based survey of public health issues in Stockholm, Sweden, self-reported hand eczema, history of childhood eczema, nickel allergy, occurrence of skin symptoms on the face and intolerance to cosmetics and hygiene products, were investigated. A postal questionnaire was sent to 15,000 inhabitants aged 19-80 years. The response rate was 73%. The 1-year prevalence of hand eczema was 8% (females 10%, males 6%). History of childhood eczema was reported by 15% and, of these, 42% also stated positively that they had had hand eczema at some time. Hypersensitivity to nickel was owned to 15% of the females and 3% of the males. Of the nickel-sensitive, 30% reported ever having had hand eczema. The combination of nickel allergy and history of childhood eczema resulted in a cumulative prevalence of hand eczema of 56%. Females reported more hand-washings per day than did males, and a relation between number of hand-washings and hand eczema was found. Self-reported 1-year prevalence of skin symptoms on the face was 14% and, of these, 33% also owned to hypersensitivity to cosmetics. Dermatitis appears to be a common health problem. This fact should be made clear to those who give priority and allocate resources to health problems, e.g., by participation of dermatologists in performing population-based surveys.     

Nickel allergy and hand eczema--a 20-year follow up

The aim of this study was to investigate the occurrence of hand eczema after 20 years in women patch tested to nickel during childhood. In 1982-1983, 960 schoolgirls were patch tested for nickel allergy; its prevalence was found to be 9%. 20 years later, the same individuals received a questionnaire regarding hand eczema and factors of importance for the development of hand eczema. 735 of 908 women (80.9%) answered the questionnaire. In total, 17.6% of respondents reported hand eczema after the age of 15 years, and the 1-year prevalence was 12.8%. There was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence of hand eczema between the groups who had previously tested positive and negative for nickel allergy. 38.3% of the respondents considered themselves to be nickel sensitive at the time they answered the questionnaire; in this group, the reported prevalence of hand eczema after age 15 was 22.5%. 31.4% of those with a history of atopic dermatitis reported hand eczema after age 15, compared with 10.6% of those without (P < 0.001). In conclusion, contact allergy to nickel in childhood did not seem to increase the prevalence of hand eczema later in life.     

Self-reported skin exposure -- a population-based study

The aim was to study self-reported skin exposure in individuals from the general population with or without hand eczema. In a population-based study in 1996 using postal questionnaires to 3000 individuals, 215 of 2218 (9.7%) reported hand eczema during the past 12 months. 182 (85%) of those with hand eczema and 182 without hand eczema, matched for age and sex, participated in telephone interviews in 1997 regarding exposure to skin irritants at work and in leisure time. No differences were shown in occupational exposure to water, hand washing or chemicals in individuals with or without hand eczema. Women reported more wet exposure than men at work and in leisure time. A correlation was found between occupational wet exposure and wet work at home. Persons in high-risk occupations reported more frequent exposure to skin irritants. However, 53% in high-risk occupations reported exposure to water and detergents for less than half-hour a day and 11% in low-risk occupations for more than half-hour a day. In conclusion, individuals with or without hand eczema seem to have similar exposure to skin irritants. Using job titles as a proxy for exposure gives misclassification, which may result in underestimation of the hand eczema risk.     

Hand eczema in car mechanics

To estimate the prevalence of hand eczema, a questionnaire was distributed to 901 male car mechanics. Of the 801 persons who responded, 15% reported hand eczema on some occasion in the previous 12 months, and 57% admitted dry skin on the hands. In a 2nd part of the study, those who reported hand eczema were examined and patch tested with a standard series and a special "car mechanics' series". The most common diagnosis was irritant contact dermatitis, 55%, and 2nd was allergic contact dermatitis, 19%. 35/105 (33%) had a total of 51 positive patch test reactions, all to substances in the standard series, except for 2 persons who reacted to oxidized d -limonene. The most frequent reactions were to thimerosal (9%), nickel (8%) and colophony (5%). One plausible explanation for the high prevalence of nickel allergy was the common use of nickel-plated tools. 5 individuals had a history of contact urticaria, but scratch tests were negative. It was concluded that car mechanics are at high risk for contact dermatitis on the hands, irritant as well as allergic.     

Factors influencing the occurrence of hand eczema in adults with a history of atopic dermatitis in childhood

A series of 955 persons aged 24-44 years, with atopic dermatitis in childhood, were interviewed in order to identify factors which increase the risk of developing hand eczema in adult life, or aggravate already existing hand eczema. Endogenous (constitutional) factors were in general of greater importance than exogenous factors, viz. chemicals, water, soil and wear (friction). Eczematous involvement of the hands in childhood was of predominant importance. In individuals without such involvement, severe (widespread) dermatitis in childhood was a dominant factor. Other factors, each of them significantly more important than the exogenous ones, were persistent eczema on other parts of the body and dry/itchy skin. The factors female sex, family history of atopic dermatitis and simultaneous bronchial asthma/allergic rhinitis were associated with increased risk of developing hand eczema in adult life, but were of limited importance compared with the other endogenous and the exogenous factors.     

Medical consultations in relation to severity of hand eczema in the general population

BACKGROUND: Hand eczema is a common disease with a wide severity spectrum. Little information exists concerning the association between the severity of hand eczema and medical consultations. OBJECTIVES: To describe the self-rated severity of hand eczema in a general population and the relationship to seeking medical attention. METHODS: A questionnaire on self-reported hypersensitivity including two questions on hand eczema was sent to a random sample of 6000 individuals, aged 18-69 years, living in Copenhagen, Denmark. A total of 4242 individuals (71%) answered the questionnaire. All individuals who reported hand eczema (n = 752) within the previous 12 months received a more detailed questionnaire focused on hand eczema and a previously validated photographic guide with four groups of severity ranging from almost clear to very severe. RESULTS: Five hundred and sixty-four individuals (75%) returned the second questionnaire. The 1-year period prevalence of hand eczema was estimated to be 14% in the population. Twenty-three per cent rated their hand eczema as moderate to very severe. In total, 67% had consulted their general practitioner and 44% had consulted a dermatologist because of hand eczema. Multivariate analysis showed a positive association (P < 0.05) between severity of hand eczema and medical consultations. Of those individuals (n = 102) who had not consulted a dermatologist 26% had experienced moderate to very severe hand eczema within the previous 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: A considerable proportion of individuals with moderate to very severe hand eczema in the general population miss out on the potential benefit of a dermatological examination, patch testing and a thorough-going exploration of environmental factors.     

Work-related hand eczema in atopics

549 individuals with severe (group 1), 406 with moderate (group 2) atopic dermatitis in childhood, 222 with respiratory allergy but no atopic dermatitis in childhood (group 3), and 199 without personal or family atopy (group 4) were studied as to occupational health symptoms due to hand eczema. In groups 1, 2 and 4, there was a slightly significant difference (P less than 0.05) between the frequency of hand eczema in individuals with and without occupational exposure to chemicals, water, soil or wear (friction). Despite no such work, 55% in group 1 and 44% in group 2 had developed hand eczema. About 1/4 of the atopics in extreme risk occupations, such as ladies' hairdressers and nursing assistants, had not developed hand eczema. Altogether, 9% in groups 1 and 2 and 3% in group 4 had changed their jobs due to hand eczema, the majority from work with to work without exposure to chemicals, water, soil or wear. Social factors had usually contributed to the change. The healing rate after taking up a new occupation was 15% in group 1, 36% in group 2 and 67% (4 out of 6) in group 4. The majority of the patients whose eczema had not healed had improved in their new occupations. It is claimed that medical reasons for change of occupation should be carefully weighed against social reasons.     

FS08.4Prognosis of hand eczema – a 15‐year follow‐up

Aims: To study long‐term prognosis of hand eczema and to identify factors of importance for the prognosis.
Methods: A cohort of 1238 individuals with verified hand eczema diagnosis was established by a population‐based prevalence study in Gothenburg, Sweden, in 1982–83. In 1998 a questionnaire was mailed to all individuals with available addresses (n = 1115). The response ratio was 78%(868/1115).
Results: 66% reported periods of hand eczema since 1983, and 44% during the past year. 12% stated continuous symptoms. No significant difference was found between the sexes. 74% of those who reported symptoms after 1983 considered that their hand eczema had improved. Significant differences in the persistence of hand eczema were related to the age at onset of hand eczema, skin atopy, and the extension of eczema at examination. Contact allergy related significantly to occurrence of hand eczema during the year before follow‐up. 32% had visited a doctor, 7% reported sick leave periods, 2% sick pension and 3% change of occupation due to hand eczema.
Conclusions: In this population‐based study, a majority of individuals with hand eczema reported periods of eczema during a 15‐year follow‐up, implying that hand eczema is a longstanding disease. Young age at onset, history of childhood eczema and extension of the hand eczema were prognostic factors. Hand eczema did entail consequences like change of occupation, sick leave or pension in more than 10% during a 15‐year period.     

Clinical characteristics and consequences of hand eczema - an 8-year follow-up study of a population-based twin cohort

Background:  Few population-based clinical follow-up studies on hand eczema are reported.
Objectives:  The aim of this study was to characterize clinical symptoms and to examine occupational and medical consequences as well as persistence of hand eczema in a population-based twin cohort.
Patients/Methods:  A total of 274 individuals with and without hand eczema were examined, patch tested, and interviewed in 1997–1998 and 2005–2006. Data on 188 individuals with hand eczema in 2005–2006 were analysed.
Results:  Erythema and scaling were the most frequent symptoms, and fingers and palms were most often affected. Mean hand eczema severity index score in individuals with clinical symptoms was 12.0. Sick leave was reported by 12.4%; job change by 8.5%. Being in the lowest socio-economic group and atopic dermatitis were risk factors for sick leave [odds ratio (OR) = 5.6; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.5–22.9 and OR = 2.9; 95% CI 1.0–8.1]. The majority (63.4%) had seen a doctor at least once, and atopic dermatitis was a risk factor for more than 1 visit (OR = 3.0; 95% CI 1.4–6.4). Duration of >10 years was a risk factor for persistence of symptoms, which was reported by 67.7%.
Conclusions:  The clinical picture and consequences of hand eczema vary; however, the majority experience chronic symptoms.     

Is the question ‘Have you had childhood eczema?’ useful for assessing childhood atopic eczema in adult population surveys?

Atopic eczema (AE) is a major risk factor for hand eczema. In Scandinavian population‐based studies, the occurrence of AE in childhood has often been assessed by the question ‘Have you had childhood eczema?’ In the present study, this question was validated. A questionnaire was sent to 600 cases with AE and 600 controls without eczema or allergic disease, identified in school medical records from the 1960s. The response rate was 70.5%, and the mean age of the respondents was 36.7 years. The specificity of the question was 70.7% and the sensitivity 89.9%. The sensitivity was higher and the specificity lower in a subgroup with current hand eczema compared with a group without hand eczema. The results showed that the question overestimated the prevalence of AE in childhood by a factor of 1.6. When used for risk assessment, the question provided a better estimate of the risk of current hand eczema as compared with the lifetime risk of hand eczema. In conclusion, the validated question overestimated prevalence of childhood AE and may overestimate AE as a risk factor for hand eczema in adult population surveys.     

Occupational hand eczema in an industrial city

Hand eczema in relation to occupation was studied in an industrial city. Questionnaires were sent to 20,000 individuals aged 20-65 years, randomly selected from the population register of the city. Those subjects (1385) considering themselves to have had hand eczema within the previous 12 months were invited to a dermatological examination including patch testing. It was found that the reported 1-year period prevalence of hand eczema in the total sample was 11.8%. The only occupational group reporting a statistically significant higher 1-year period prevalence was service work, 15.4%. Among all occupations, cleaners turned out to have the highest period prevalence, 21.3%. Hand eczema was more common among people reporting some kind of occupational exposure. The most harmful exposure turned out to be to unspecified chemicals, water and detergents and dust and dry dirt. The use of protective gloves is reported and analysed. The most common contact allergy was nickel, followed by cobalt, fragrance-mix, balsam of Peru and colophony. A statistically significant increase in contact allergy to colophony for women in administrative work was found. It is concluded that the type of hand eczema that is mostly dependent on occupation is irritant contact dermatitis.     

The epidemiology of hand eczema in the general population – prevalence and main findings*

Numerous studies have investigated the prevalence and risk factors of hand eczema in the general population. These studies are of high value as they tend to be less biased than studies using clinical populations and as they are important for healthcare decision makers when they allocate resources. This study aimed to review the epidemiology of hand eczema in the general population. Literature was examined using Pubmed‐Medline, Biosis, Science Citation Index, and dermatology text books. On the basis of studies performed between 1964 and 2007, the point prevalence of hand eczema was around 4%, the 1‐year prevalence nearly 10%, whereas the lifetime prevalence reached 15%. Based on seven studies, the median incidence rate of hand eczema was 5.5 cases/1000 person‐years (women = 9.6 and men = 4.0). A high incidence rate was associated with female sex, contact allergy, atopic dermatitis, and wet work. Atopic dermatitis was the single most important risk factor for hand eczema. Hand eczema resulted in medical consultations in 70%, sick leave (> 7 days) in about 20%, and job change in about 10%. Mean sick time was longer among those with allergic hand eczema than those with atopic and irritant hand eczema. Moderate to severe extension of hand eczema was the strongest risk factor for persistence of hand eczema. Other risk factors included early onset of hand eczema and childhood eczema. The aetiology of hand eczema is multifactorial and includes environmental as well as genetic factors. Future studies should focus on unresolved areas of hand eczema, for example, genetic predisposition.     

Type I and Type IV allergy to unfractionated heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin with no reaction to recombinant hirudin

Aim:  To investigate the risk of adult hand eczema and possible influence on later working life in persons with childhood atopic dermatitis.
Method:  After reviewing medical records from the school healthcare in Stockholm regarding individuals born 1960–69, 600 individuals where signs of atopic dermatitis were noted ("cases") and 600 matched controls without eczema or allergic disease ("controls") were identified. 405 cases and 378 controls answered a questionnaire regarding past and present skin disease, choice of job, exposure at work and possible change of job due to eczema.
Results: Hand eczema was more than 3 times more common among cases, 42%, compared to controls, 13%(p < 0.001). Hand eczema during the past 12 months was reported by 24% of the cases and 9% of the controls (p < 0.001). The proportion of individuals working in jobs with high‐risk for hand eczema was equal between the groups, as well as exposure to water, detergents, chemicals and hand washing. Among the cases 9% reported change of job due to eczema compared to 2% of controls (p < 0.001) and sick leave 10% compared to 2%(p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Childhood atopic dermatitis is a risk factor for hand eczema. As the proportion of individuals in jobs with high‐risk for hand eczema and the exposure was the same in cases and controls measures preventive measures are important to reduce consequences like sick leave and change of job.     

Atopic dermatitis, nickel sensitivity and xerosis as risk factors for hand eczema in women

Knowledge of the relationship between a history of atopic dermatitis and nickel sensitivity as risk factors for hand eczema is limited. Our objective was to study the relative importance of atopic manifestations and nickel sensitivity as risk factors for hand eczema in women. From women referred for patch testing with a dental series. 100 consecutive nickel-positive and 95 nickel-negative patients were studied. A history of atopic manifestations and a history of 5 symptoms of hand eczema, i.e., dry erythemas, maculopapules, vesicles, erosions and hyperkeratoses were recorded. A history of atopic dermatitis was found lo increase the risk of the 5 symptoms of hand eczema and sick leave due to hand eczema highly significantly. Nickel sensitivity increased only the risk of vesicles and erosions, Xerosis increased the risk of dry erythemas and vesicles. We concluded that a history of atopic dermatitis was more important than nickel sensitivity as a risk factor for hand eczema in women.     

Hand eczema in patients with history of atopic manifestations in childhood

A follow-up study of two groups of individuals aged 24-44 years, with a history of severe and moderate atopic dermatitis in childhood (n = 549 and 406 respectively), showed that the most common site of atopic dermatitis was the hands. The prevalence of hand eczema in the two groups was 41% and 25% respectively. The corresponding figure for a group of 222 individuals with respiratory allergy, but not atopic dermatitis in childhood, was 5%, and for a control group (n = 199), without family or personal atopy, 4%. In all four groups the majority of the patients had mild to moderate hand eczema. The fingers were the most common site in all groups. In 69%, 55%, 36% and 12% respectively, hand eczema was found simultaneously with other eczematous manifestations. Irritants were considered by 71-96% in the four groups to aggravate the hand eczema. Contact with various food substances, particularly proteins, was regarded by 38%, 43%, 30% and 9% as an eliciting/aggravating factor. Dust was looked upon as an eliciting/aggravating factor by 25% and 20% of the individuals in the two groups with atopic dermatitis in childhood, but by no one in the control group.     

Presenteeism in a Dutch hand eczema population—a cross‐sectional survey

Background

Presenteeism (attending work despite complaints and ill health, which should prompt rest and absence) has been overlooked in the field of hand eczema.

Objectives

To examine the 1‐year prevalence of presenteeism related to hand eczema in a population of hand eczema patients who visited a tertiary referral centre. Secondary objectives: to identify intrinsic/extrinsic reasons for presenteeism and to evaluate associated factors.

Methods

This was a cross‐sectional questionnaire study. Presenteeism was defined as “going to work despite feeling you should have taken sick leave because of hand eczema”. Respondents answered questions about socio‐demographic factors, clinical features, occupational characteristics, and hand eczema related to occupational exposure.

Results

Forty‐one per cent (141/346) of patients who had both worked and had hand eczema during the past 12 months reported presenteeism. The most often reported reasons were: “Because I do not want to give in to my impairment/weakness” (46%) and “Because I enjoy my work” (40%). Presenteeism was associated with: mean hand eczema severity; absenteeism because of hand eczema; improvement of hand eczema when away from work; and high‐risk occupations.

Conclusions

In this study, presenteeism was common and predominantly observed in patients with more severe hand eczema and occupational exposure. The most frequently reported reasons for presenteeism were of an intrinsic nature.     

Incidence of hand eczema in a population-based twin cohort: genetic and environmental risk factors

BACKGROUND: Population-based studies on the incidence of hand eczema are sparse. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this prospective follow-up study was to determine the incidence rate of hand eczema in a population-based twin cohort. Secondly, the role of genetic factors and other potential risk factors for hand eczema was investigated. METHODS: A questionnaire on self-reported hand eczema was answered by 5610 and 4128 twin individuals in 1996 and 2005, respectively. Data were analysed in a Poisson regression analysis. RESULTS: The crude incidence rate was 8.8 cases per 1000 person-years (95% confidence interval, [CI] 7.7-9.9). Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) dependent on the co-twin's hand eczema status revealed a significant, doubled risk for monozygotic twin individuals with a co-twin affected by hand eczema, compared with dizygotic twin individuals with a co-twin affected by hand eczema (IRR 2.4, 95% CI 1.4-4.1). Also, significantly increased IRRs were found for positive patch test, atopic dermatitis, and wet work. CONCLUSIONS: Hand eczema is still a frequent disease and genetic factors are confirmed important risk factors. Positive patch test, atopic dermatitis and wet work were associated with an increased risk, whereas no association with age, sex, smoking or alcohol was found.     

Hand dermatosis in upper secondary school pupils: 2-year comparison and follow-up

The purpose of this comparative study was to record the prevalence and to estimate the incidence of self-reported hand dermatosis in a cohort of upper secondary school pupils on two different occasions, in 1995 and 1997. A previously validated questionnaire was used. Of the 1273 pupils invited to participate, 1136 (89.2%) responded to the questionnaire. The 1-year prevalence increased, although not significantly, from 9.6% in 1995 to 10.5% in 1997. For girls, the 1-year prevalence increased significantly, from 12.4% to 15.7%, while for boys the 1-year prevalence decreased, but not significantly, from 6.7% to 5.1%. The cumulative incidence was significantly higher (P < 0.001) among the girls (10.5%) than among the boys (2.8%). Multiple logistic regressions showed that the highest risk factors for 1-year prevalence in 1995 were having self-reported childhood eczema, and a family history of atopic eczema or asthma. In 1997, the highest risk factors were self-reported childhood eczema, female gender and a family history of atopic eczema. This study has identified the point at which the genders diverge with regard to hand dermatosis, with boys tending to recover, while girls show a steady or even increasing prevalence.     

Role of the atopy score and of single atopic features as risk factors for the development of hand eczema in trainee metal workers

This study was performed as part of PROMETES (Swiss Prospective Metal Worker Eczema Study) to examine the role of atopy as a possible risk factor for the development of hand eczema in trainee metal workers. In a cohort of 201 young men without any skin problems at the start of their apprenticeship, 9.5% developed signs of dermatitis on their hands within a period of 6 months. The 2. 5-year incidence was 23%. We did not find a significantly increased risk for hand eczema in those participants with an atopic skin diathesis according to the atopy score of Diepgen et al. (Dermatosen 1991; 39: 79-83) Analysis of individual atopic signs and symptoms showed reported metal reactivity to have a significant influence on the onset of early skin damage within 6 months, whereas a history of flexural eczema appeared to be significantly related to the overall incidence over 2.5 years.