Wound complications following modified radical mastectomy: an analysis of perioperative factors

To assess the effect of perioperative factors on the incidence of postoperative wound complications, the authors retrospectively analyzed 101 patients who had undergone modified radical mastectomy. These factors included age, body weight, operative techniques, estimated blood loss, wound-catheter drainage, extent of axillary dissection, nodal involvement, and length of hospital stay. Complications included seroma (10.9%), wound infection (8.9%), wound necrosis (5%), hematoma (3%), lymphedema (2%), and pneumothorax (1%). The logistic regression method was used to analyze the data. When electrocautery was used to create the skin flaps, the probability of a wound complication was .462, a 44% increase over that calculated for the cold-knife technique (P = .05). A prolonged hospitalization accompanied the occurrence of a wound complication. No other factors reached statistical significance.     

Wound healing following mastectomy

Local complications following mastectomy are of considerable importance if peri-operative chemotherapy is to be used. A retrospective survey of 100 patients following Patey mastectomy was therefore undertaken to investigate problems associated with wound healing in the absence of such therapy. The survey showed that 18% of patients developed postoperative wound infection, this being severe in 50% of cases. Varying degrees of total wound breakdown occurred in 9% of patients while delayed healing occurred in a further 5%. The incidence of seroma was 25%, and the majority of these patients required further drainage. There was a significant association between seroma formation and wound infection (P less than 0.05). The mean length of hospital stay in patients without wound infection was 11.7 days, but was increased to 27.3 days when infection occurred (P less than 0.001).     

Reconstruction of the breast following radical mastectomy.

A method of reconstruction of the breast following radical mastectomy is presented. The technique involves the use of an individually made Silastic prosthesis inserted three to six months after the mastectomy. A new simple method of nipple reconstruction is described, and the total restoration can be achieved in one operation. It is suggested that reconstruction of the breast be considered more frequently in patients subjected to mastectomy.     

One-day hospitalization following modified radical mastectomy.

Postoperative management of patients following modified radical mastectomy has changed dramatically in recent years. Historically, patients usually remained in the hospital with closed suction drainage until the amount of drainage had decreased sufficiently for them to be removed. The feasibility of early discharge on the day following surgery was studied in a prospective manner in 29 consecutive breast cancer patients; 27 underwent unilateral modified radical mastectomy and 2 bilateral mastectomies by a single surgeon. All patients were instructed before surgery about planned early discharge and drain care. Twenty-seven of 29 patients (93.3%) were discharged the day following surgery. However, 2 patients refused discharge and were discharged on postoperative Day Two, and one patient was readmitted for confusion. Drains were removed in the office an average of 5.07 days after surgery. Forty-five per cent of patients developed a seroma that required aspiration at least once. No significant long-term sequela were experienced as a result of early discharge. The average hospital cost was reduced by $2,474.00 or 36 per cent (P less than 0.001) as compared to other surgeons in the same medical center who held to traditional postoperative care. The authors conclude that discharge on the day following surgery for patients undergoing a modified radical mastectomy is safe and cost effective.     

Wound infection following appendicectomy: the effect of extraperitoneal wound drainage and systemic antibiotic prophylaxis.

The value of extraperitoneal wound drainage and a 3-day course of prophylactic systemic cephaloridine used both separately and together have been assessed in a prospective controlled randomized trial involving 246 patients undergoing appendicectomy at the Leicester Royal Infirmary. Extraperitoneal wound drainage was shown to reduce significantly the incidence of postoperative wound infection in patients with a gangrenous or perforated appendix (P less than 0-025). Prophylactic cephaloridine significantly reduced the overall incidence of wound infection (P less than 0-02) and was also effective when the appendix was gangrenous or perforated (P less than 0-01). A highly significant reduction in wound infection was achieved when the appendix was gangrenous or perforated by the addition of wound drainage to the antibiotic regimen (P less than 0-001).     

Postirradiation fibrosarcoma following radical mastectomy

A case of fibrosarcoma arising in the scar of the radical mastectomy with postoperative irradiation of breast carcinoma is reported. The tumors arose five times in spite of the extirpations including surrounding tissue since 11 years after radical mastectomy and postoperative irradiation. All of arisen tumors were diagnosed fibrosarcoma histologically and with every recurrence the aggrevation of malignancy of tumors was shown. In this case, the primary tumor of the breast was infiltrating carcinoma and no sign of fibrosarcoma was noted histologically. The mastectomy scar was indicated the irradiation therapy postoperatively and fibrosarcoma developed 11 years after postoperative irradiation. Namely, this case agreed to the strict criteria of the postirradiation sarcoma proposed by Cahan et al. In this paper, a case of postirradiation fibrosarcoma arising in the scar of radical mastectomy for carcinoma is presented.     

Comparison of postoperative complications following radical and modified radical mastectomy

A retrospective study was carried out by reviewing the files of 100 patients who had undergone radical mastectomy and 100 patients who had undergone modified radical mastectomy from 1966 to 1975 for the purpose of comparing early and late complications. In each group, 80 patients were involved in long-term follow-up. Immediate postoperative complications—notably seromas, wound infection, and flap necrosis—were found to be considerably fewer following modified radical mastectomy. There was also a significantly lower incidence of late complications, such as limb edema and recurrent infection, after modified radical mastectomy. Since the cure rates achieved by the two radical mastectomy procedures appear to be similar, it is concluded that modified radical mastectomy is the procedure of choice in stages I and II cancer of the breast.

---

Résumé Nous avons relevé les dossiers de 100 patientes traitées par mammectomie radicale conventionelle et de 100 patientes traitées par mammectomie radicale modifiée et avons comparé les complications post-opératoires observées dans les 2 groupes. Toutes les patientes furent opérées entre 1966 et 1975. Dans chaque groupe, nous avions un recul suffisant chez 80 patientes pour évaluer les résultats à long terme. Les complications post-opératoires, immédiates (sérÔmes, infections de plaie, nécrose de greffe cutanée) ou tardives (lymphoedème du bras, infections à répétition), furent beaucoup plus rares après mammectomie radicale modifiée. Etant donné que les taux de guérison obtenus avec ces 2 opérations semblent Être les mÊmes, nous en concluons que la mammectomie radicale modifiée est l'opération de choix pour traiter les cancers du sein au stade I et II.

     

乳腺癌术后引流方式的比较

目的 比较几种常见引流方式的优劣。方法 对2002年1月-2004年12月的161例乳腺癌手术患者各种引流方式进行横向比较研究。结果 159例乳腺癌根治术患者中44例积液，积液的总发生率为27．67％；腋下＋胸内侧双管引流组3例积液，发生率为13．04％；腋下引流＋胸壁栽葱组29例积液，发生率为30．85％；腋下引流组12例积液，发生率为27．90％。结论腋下＋胸内侧双管负压引流组积液的发生率明显低于其他两组，但缺乏显著差异。     

Modified radical mastectomy.

The recent history of operations for breast cancer indicates a growing trend toward conservatism. The modified radical mastectomy achieves the goal of removing all evidence of cancer in the breast involved and removes the regional lymph nodes for accurate staging of the disease. In addition, it provides a cosmetic result superior to that of the standard radical mastectomy. Breast reconstruction may be undertaken at a later time with excellent result. The 5 and 10 year survival rates of comparable groups of patients after modified radical mastectomy and standard radical mastectomy appear to be almost identical.     

乳腺癌术后乳房再造的选择

自1894年Halsted创造了乳腺癌根治手术以来，破坏性广泛的根治术和改良根治术成了治疗乳腺癌的定型手术。至今，仍被国内许多医院作为一种基本的治疗术式在开展。外科医师重视了对生命的拯救，而忽视了对乳房的重视。自上世纪70年代以来，由于对乳腺癌生物特性的进一步认识，保乳手术已成为治疗乳腺癌的重要术式。保乳手术之所以受到关注，是因为其有着与区域性广泛切除同样好的     

乳腺癌改良根治术后乳房再造术的临床研究

目的:介绍乳房再造术应用于早期乳腺癌患者既可保留乳房美观外形,又安全可行。方法:对早期乳腺癌患者行改良根治术后并假体植入、背阔肌肌皮瓣移植、横行腹直肌肌皮瓣移植、腹壁下动脉穿支肌皮瓣移植等不同方法进行Ⅰ期或Ⅱ期乳房再造。结果:2003～2008年共治疗21例,术后随访3年、4年、5年以上分别为18例、12例、4例,均无肿瘤复发及转移,术后外观效果满意。结论:乳房再造术对早期乳腺癌患者安全可行,效果好,并可根据患者不同情况及需求采用不同方法。     

Venous drainage of free flaps following radical neck dissection.

Large tissue defects may occur following head and neck surgery. When combined with ipsilateral radical neck dissection the venous drainage of a free flap used to cover the defect may be compromised. Twelve patients having radical neck dissections underwent on-table venography to study the pattern of venous drainage of these flaps. The predominant drainage pattern is initially in a cephalic direction, then across the midline and finally in a caudal direction on the contralateral side of the neck. Venous drainage to the contralateral side of the neck may be a determinant of flap survival. In order to facilitate venous drainage following free flap procedures, patients should be positioned so that the contralateral internal jugular vein is not compressed. Drains should be placed caudal to the microvascular anastomoses in order to minimize interference with the cephalic direction of venous drainage. Any patient having a radical neck dissection requiring a central venous catheter should have it placed ipsilateral to the neck dissection. Thrombosis around a contralaterally placed cannula may significantly increase head and neck venous pressure.