Effect of two injections of non-adjuvanted influenza A H1N1pdm2009 vaccine in renal transplant recipients: INSERM C09-32 TRANSFLUVAC trial

Background

Enhancing vaccine immunogenicity in kidney transplant recipients, particularly against influenza, is required since the immunosuppression used to prevent graft rejection limits vaccine immunogenicity. We therefore investigated the immunogenicity and safety of a double dose non-adjuvanted vaccination regimen against influenza H1N1pdm2009 in kidney transplant adult recipients.

Methods

A prospective single-arm study was conducted including 121 renal transplant recipients under triple immunosuppressive regimen. Patients received 2 injections (day 0, day 21) of an inactivated, non-adjuvanted H1N1pdm2009 vaccine. Immunogenicity (hemagglutination-inhibition [HI] antibodies and anti-hemagglutin [HA] specific T cells) was evaluated after one and two injections (day 21, day 42) and at 6 months (day 182).

Results

The seroprotection rate (HI antibody titer ≥ 1/40) was 19% at day 0 (n = 119), 53% at day 21 (n = 118), 60% at day 42 (n = 116) (p = 0.013; day 42 vs. day 21) and 56% at day 182 (n = 113). The seroconversion rate was 24% and 32%, the geometric mean fold rise was 3.7 and 4.6 after the first and second injections, respectively. T-cell immunity to the H1N1pdm2009 vaccine showed a two-fold increase from baseline, though not statistically significant, in H1N1pdm2009-HA-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in 34% and 48% of cases, respectively. No rejection episodes related to vaccination were observed while the donor-specific antibodies and creatinine clearance remained unchanged throughout the study.

Conclusion

Administration of two doses of the non-adjuvanted influenza H1N1pdm2009 vaccine in renal transplant patients is safe and induces a significant seroprotection, not strong enough yet to meet European or US requirements for adults below 60 years, but comparable to seroprotection levels usually observed in the non immunosuppressed elderly population or conferred by a single dose of adjuvanted vaccine in solid organ transplant recipients. These results provide useful indications for future strategies required to improve immunogenicity of vaccines against influenza in transplanted patients.     

Pandemic influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 improves vaccination routine in subsequent years: A cohort study from 2009 to 2011

Background

In 2009 the pandemic influenza virus A(H1N1)pdm09 emerged with guidance that people at risk should be vaccinated. It is unclear how this event affected the underlying seasonal vaccination rate in subsequent years.

Purpose

To investigate the association of pandemic influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and seasonal flu vaccination status in 2009 with vaccination rates in 2010 and 2011.

Methods

Data were collected in 40 Dutch family practices on patients at risk for influenza during 2009–2011; data analysis was conducted in 2012.

Results

A multilevel logistic regression model (n = 41,843 patients) adjusted for practice and patient characteristics (age and gender, as well as those patient groups at risk), showed that people who were vaccinated against A(H1N1)pdm09 in 2009 were more likely to have been vaccinated in 2010 (OR 6.02; 95%CI 5.62–6.45, p < .0001). This likelihood was even more for people who were vaccinated against seasonal flu in 2009 (OR 13.83; 95%CI 12.93–14.78, p < .0001). A second analysis on the uptake rate in 2011 (n = 39,468 patients) showed that the influence of the vaccination state in 2009 declined after two years, but the diminishing effect was smaller for people vaccinated against A(H1N1)pdm09 than for seasonal flu (OR 5.50; 95%CI 5.13–5.90, p < .0001; OR 10.98; 95%CI 10.26–11.75, p < .0001, respectively).

Conclusion

Being vaccinated against A(H1N1)pdm09 and seasonal influenza in the pandemic year 2009 enhanced the probability of vaccination in the next year and this was still effective in 2011. This suggests that peoples’ vaccination routines were not changed by the rumor around the outbreak of A(H1N1)pdm09, but rather confirmed underlying behavior.     

Live attenuated seasonal and pandemic influenza vaccine in school-age children: A randomized controlled trial

Background

The novel influenza A(H1N1pdm09) virus emerged in North America in early 2009 and rapidly spread worldwide. In this study we report the efficacy of the live attenuated monovalent H1N1pdm09 vaccine and 2009–10 seasonal influenza vaccine in a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

Methods

We enrolled 703 children aged 7–11. Each child was randomly allocated in the ratio 3:2 to receive one dose of live attenuated monovalent H1N1pdm09 vaccine or saline placebo between November 2009 and January 2010, followed after 3–10 weeks by independent random allocation to one dose of live attenuated trivalent 2009–10 seasonal influenza vaccine or saline placebo in the same ratio. Children were followed up through September 2010 with biweekly telephone calls and symptom diaries. Seasonal and pandemic influenza infections were confirmed by virologic testing of nose and throat swabs collected during acute respiratory illnesses.

Results

Overall, 30 children had confirmed influenza including 3 (0.43%) H1N1pdm09, 10 (1.4%) seasonal A(H3N2), and 17 (2.4%) influenza B. There were no significant differences in incidence rates of H1N1pdm09 or A(H3N2) between the four study arms, but receipt of the seasonal influenza vaccine was associated with a significant reduction in risk of influenza B (p < 0.01). Vaccine efficacy against confirmed H1N1pdm09 infection associated with receipt of the monovalent H1N1pdm09 vaccine was 65% (95% confidence interval, CI: −281%, 97%). Vaccine efficacies against confirmed seasonal influenza A(H3N2) and B infection associated with receipt of the seasonal influenza vaccine were 31% (95% CI: −138%, 80%) and 96% (95% CI: 67%, 99%) respectively.

Conclusions

Vaccine efficacy was consistent with other studies of the monovalent H1N1pdm09 vaccine and seasonal influenza vaccines. Our study was underpowered to provide precise estimates of vaccine efficacy due to low incidence of influenza A viruses during the study period.     

Host immune response to A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccination and infection: a one-year prospective study on six cohorts of subjects

Background

The long-term immunogenicity after novel vaccine against A(H1N1)pdm09 administration or natural infection has not been well investigated.

Methods

Six cohorts of subjects were followed up for over one year: one-dose A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccine recipient, A(H1N1)pdm09-seasonal trivalent vaccine recipients in different orders, confirmed A(H1N1)pdm09 patients without vaccination, with previous A(H1N1)pdm09 or seasonal influenza vaccination. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells and sera samples were collected at baseline and month 1, 2, 3, 7 and 14 after vaccination (infection). The immunogenicity was determined by hemagglutination-inhibition (HI) and B cell enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assays.

Results

Single dose of A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccine elicited antibody titer of greater than 1:40 in 40% adults for 1 year and mean live of this adequate antibody was determined as 8.35 months. In contrast, responses after natural infections had lower peaking level and a relatively longer antibody duration, with estimated mean lives of 11.8 months. Pre-vaccination with the seasonal flu vaccine led to a significant reduction in HI titer to A(H1N1)pdm09 one month after vaccination, while pre-vaccination with A(H1N1)pdm09 had no effect on seasonal influenza vaccination. Seasonal flu vaccination followed by A(H1N1)pdm09 infection elicited boosting effect on antibody response against A(H1N1)pdm09. A similar memory B cell response was elicited from both vaccination and infection by ELISPOT assay.

Conclusions

The long-term decay of immunity for A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccine and natural infection indicates the need of revaccination after the host lose protection acquired from either vaccination or infection. Prior infection, rather than the pre-vaccination with seasonal influenza could act on the host immunity to elicit boosting effect on the A(H1N1)pdm09.     

Influenza vaccine effectiveness against medically-attended influenza illness during the 2012–2013 season in Beijing,China

Background

Influenza vaccine coverage remains low in China, and there is limited information on the preventive value of local vaccination programs.

Methods

As part of influenza virological surveillance in Beijing, China during the 2012–2013 influenza season, we assessed the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of one or more doses of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV3) in preventing medically-attended influenza-like-illness (ILI) associated with laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infection using a test-negative case–control design. Influenza vaccination was determined based on self-report by adult patients or the parents of child patients.

Results

Of 1998 patients with ILI, 695 (35%) tested positive for influenza viruses, including 292 (42%) A(H3N2), 398 (57%) A(H1N1)pdm09, and 5 (1%) not (sub)typed influenza viruses. The rate of influenza vaccination among all patients was 4% (71/1998). Among influenza positive patients, 2% (57/1303) were vaccinated compared to 4% (14/695) among influenza negative patients, resulting in VE for one or more doses of vaccine (adjusted for age, sex, week, and days since illness onset) against all circulating influenza viruses of 52% (95% CI = 12–74%). A significant adjusted VE for one or more doses of vaccine for all ages against A(H1N1)pdm09 of 59% (95% CI, 8–82%) was observed; however, the VE against A(H3N2) was 43% (95% CI, −30% to 75%). The point estimate of VE was 59% (95% CI, 19–79%) for those aged <60 years, but a negative VE point estimate without statistical significance was observed among those aged ≥60 years.

Conclusions

IIV3 conferred moderate protection against medically-attended influenza in Beijing, China during the 2012–2013 season, especially against the A(H1N1)pdm09 strain and among those aged <60 years old.     

The effectiveness of influenza vaccination in preventing hospitalizations in children in Hong Kong, 2009–2013

Background

Influenza vaccination is widely recommended every year to protect individuals against influenza virus infection and illness. There are few published estimates of influenza vaccine effectiveness against hospitalization in children or from subtropical regions.

Methods

We conducted a test-negative year-round study between October 2009 and September 2013, recruiting children 6 months to 17 years of age admitted to two hospitals in Hong Kong with a febrile acute respiratory infection. Cases were tested for influenza A and B and conditional logistic regression was used to estimate vaccine effectiveness comparing influenza vaccination history of the trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) among patients testing positive versus negative for influenza, adjusting for age and sex and matching by calendar week of recruitment.

Results

Overall vaccine effectiveness against hospitalization with laboratory-confirmed influenza A and B was estimated to be 61.7% (95% CI: 43.0%, 74.2%). The estimated vaccine effectiveness against A(H3N2) was 36.6% (95% CI: −25.5%, 67.9%) compared to 71.5% (95% CI: 39.4%, 86.6%) for A(H1N1)pdm09 and 68.8% (95% CI: 41.6%, 83.3%) for B.

Conclusions

Vaccine effectiveness against hospitalization in children varied from year to year, but was moderate to high overall even in an area with influenza activity throughout the year.     

The impact of pandemic A(H1N1)pdm09 influenza and vaccine-associated adverse events on parental attitudes and influenza vaccine uptake in young children

Introduction

Parental attitudes towards vaccination significantly influence vaccine uptake. The A(H1N1)pdm09 influenza pandemic was followed in 2010 by an unprecedented increase in febrile reactions in children receiving trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine manufactured by bioCSL. Uptake of TIV in children <5 years in Western Australia (WA) decreased in 2010 and has remained low. The impact of pandemic A(H1N1)pdm09 and adverse-events on parental attitudes towards vaccination is uncertain.

Materials and Methods

A parental attitudes survey towards influenza illness and vaccination was conducted as part of the West Australian Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness study. Vaccination status was assessed by parental interview and confirmed by the national register and/or vaccine providers. Parental attitudes from vaccinated and unvaccinated children and attitudes in 2008–2009 and 2010–2012 were compared. Principal Component Analysis was conducted to determine core attitudes that influenced vaccine uptake.

Results

Vaccination history and parental attitude surveys were available from 2576 children. Parents of fully vaccinated children less frequently stated that influenza was a mild disease, more frequently stated that influenza vaccine was safe and were less frequently worried about vaccine side effects.Uptake of influenza vaccine decreased significantly from 2010 onwards. From 2010, parents were less concerned about severe influenza, but more concerned about vaccine side effects and safety. Despite this significant shift in attitudes towards influenza vaccine, parental acceptance of vaccines on the national immunisation program did not change. Principal Component Analysis revealed that attitudes around vaccine safety and efficacy were the most important attitudes impacting on vaccine uptake.

Conclusions

Parental attitudes to influenza vaccine changed from 2010. Confidence in the WA preschool influenza vaccination program remains low yet appeared unchanged for other vaccines. Restoring public confidence in childhood influenza vaccination is needed before uptake can be improved.     

Increased risk of anaphylaxis following administration of 2009 AS03-adjuvanted monovalent pandemic A/H1N1 (H1N1pdm09) vaccine

Background

Anaphylaxis after trivalent influenza vaccination is typically reported at a rate of <1 per million doses. In Quebec, Canada, anaphylaxis following administration of the monovalent AS03-adjuvanted H1N1pdm09 vaccine was reported through passive surveillance at a rate of 8 per million doses administered. This was 20 times higher than the reporting rate for non-adjuvanted trivalent vaccines administered during the six previous seasons. However, adequate estimation of the incidence of anaphylaxis is hindered by wide variations in definitions and diagnosis.

Methods

Using the Brighton collaboration case definition of anaphylaxis, all cases with allergic symptoms (AS) reported to public health were reviewed to estimate the incidence of anaphylaxis following AS03-adjuvanted H1N1pdm09 vaccine.

Results

Among 752 reports of allergic symptoms, 33 were initially reported as anaphylaxis of which 20/33 (60%) met the Brighton definition (19/20 with certainty levels 1 or 2). A total of 38 additional cases with onset within 1 h of vaccination also met the Brighton definition of anaphylaxis (27 (71%) with certainty levels 1 or 2). The 58 cases meeting Brighton Level 1 or 2 criteria for anaphylaxis represent a 75% increase over the 33 passively reported and an incidence of 13 per million doses administered.

Conclusion

A substantial number of patients with early-onset allergic symptoms met the most specific levels of the Brighton case definition but were not reported as anaphylaxis. Based on this specific case definition, the incidence of anaphylaxis after AS03-adjuvanted H1N1pdm09 vaccine substantially exceeded that reported with seasonal influenza vaccines, a signal that warrants better understanding.     

Serum IgG titres,but not avidity,correlates with neutralizing antibody response after H5N1 vaccination

Background

Influenza H5N1 virus constitutes a pandemic threat and development of effective H5N1 vaccines is a global priority. Anti-influenza antibodies directed towards the haemagglutinin (HA) define a correlate of protection. Both antibody concentration and avidity may be important for virus neutralization and resolving influenza disease.

Methods

We conducted a phase I clinical trial of a virosomal H5N1 vaccine adjuvanted with the immunostimulating complex Matrix M™. Sixty adults were intramuscularly immunized with two vaccine doses (21 days apart) of 30 μg HA alone or 1.5, 7.5 or 30 μg HA adjuvanted with Matrix M™. Serum H5 HA1-specific antibodies and virus neutralization were determined at days 0, 21, 42, 180 and 360 and long-term memory B cells at day 360 post-vaccination. The binding of the HA specific antibodies was measured by avidity NaSCN-elution ELISA and surface plasmon resonance (SPR).

Results

The H5 HA1-specific IgG response peaked after the second dose (day 42), was dominated by IgG1 and IgG3 and was highest in the adjuvanted vaccine groups. IgG titres correlated significantly with virus neutralization at all time points (Spearman r ≥ 0.66, p < 0.0001). By elution ELISA, serum antibody avidity was highest at days 180 and 360 post vaccination and did not correlate with virus neutralization. Long-lasting H5 HA1-specific memory B cells produced high IgG antibody avidity similar to serum IgG.

Conclusions

Maturation of serum antibody avidity continued up to day 360 after influenza H5N1 vaccination. Virus neutralization correlated with serum H5 HA1-specific IgG antibody concentrations and not antibody avidity.     

What a pandemic teaches us about vaccination attitudes of parents of children with asthma

Background

During the recent pandemic, Influenza A/H1N1 vaccine uptake remained far below the targeted rates. Associated factors regarding vaccine refusal in the general population have been reported in many studies, however the reasons behind refusals for asthmatic children have not yet been identified. We aimed to investigate Influenza A/H1N1 virus vaccine acceptance for children with asthma, to determine the attitudes and beliefs of parents concerning Influenza A/H1N1 disease and vaccine and to identify the association of asthma control parameters with vaccination.

Methods

The parents of asthmatic children aged 6–18 years participated in a cross-sectional survey study in three pediatric allergy outpatient clinics. The survey measured demographic factors, asthma control parameters, vaccination rates, and beliefs and attitudes regarding Influenza A/H1N1 vaccine.

Results

Of the 625 asthmatic children, 16.8% (n = 105) were immunized with Influenza A/H1N1 and 45.7% (n = 286) with seasonal influenza vaccine. Educational background of parents (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, for father's and mother's educational level, respectively), previous vaccination with seasonal influenza (p < 0.001), and having a family member vaccinated against Influenza A/H1N1 (p < 0.001) had a significant influence on vaccine acceptance, while fear of side effects (88.6%) was the major parental reason for refusing the vaccine. Asthma control parameters had no influence on uptake of the vaccine. Physician recommendation (84.8%) was important in the decision-making process for immunization. The statement “Children with asthma should receive swine flu vaccine” increased the likelihood of being vaccinated [OR: 2.160, (95%CI 1.135–4.111), p = 0.019].

Conclusion

Although asthmatic children are considered to be a high-priority group for Influenza A/H1N1 vaccination, we found low uptake of vaccine among our patients. Beliefs and attitudes rather than asthma control parameters influenced parental decisions for immunization. Understanding the underlying determinants for refusing the vaccine will help to improve vaccine campaigns in advance of a future outbreak.     

DNA vaccination protects against an influenza challenge in a double-blind randomised placebo-controlled phase 1b clinical trial

Background

We have developed a Trivalent DNA vaccine for influenza consisting of three plasmids expressing haemagglutinin from different seasonal influenza virus strains delivered using PMED™ (particle mediated epidermal delivery). We set out to determine whether this vaccine (with and without a molecular adjuvant DNA Encoded Immunostimulator-Labile Toxin (DEI-LT)) could protect subjects from a controlled influenza virus challenge.

Methods

Healthy adult subjects were screened for susceptibility to infection with influenza A/H3 Panama/2007/99 then vaccinated with 4 μg Trivalent influenza DNA vaccine, 2 μg Trivalent influenza DNA vaccine plus DEI-LT or placebo. Safety and serological responses to vaccination were assessed and on Day 56 subjects were challenged with A/H3 Panama/2007/99 virus.

Results

Vaccination with 4 μg Trivalent or 2 μg Trivalent/DEI-LT was well tolerated and induced antibody responses to two of the three influenza virus vaccine strains. Post challenge, subjects in the 4 μg Trivalent group (N = 27) showed reductions in disease symptoms and viral shedding compared to placebo (N = 27), with an overall vaccine efficacy of 41% (95% confidence interval (CI) = −1.5, 67.7) for ‘Any illness with or without fever’ and 53% for ‘Upper respiratory tract infection’ (95% CI = 8.0, 77.7).

Conclusion

It was concluded that PMED vaccination with 4 μg Trivalent influenza DNA vaccine was safe and elicited immunological responses that protected human subjects from influenza; this is the first report of protection of human subjects from disease by DNA vaccination.     

Immune response after one or two doses of pandemic influenza A (H1N1) monovalent,AS03-adjuvanted vaccine in HIV infected adults

Introduction

Continued research is needed to evaluate and improve the immunogenicity of influenza vaccines in HIV infected patients. We aimed to determine the antibody responses after one or two doses of the AS03-adjuvanted pandemic influenza A (H1N1) vaccine in HIV infected patients.

Method

Following the influenza season 2009/2010, 219 HIV infected patients were included and divided into three groups depending on whether they received none (n = 60), one (n = 31) or two (n = 128) doses of pandemic influenza A (H1N1) vaccine. At inclusion, antibody titers for all patients were analyzed and compared to pre-pandemic antibody titers analyzed from serum samples in a local storage facility.

Results

4–9 months after a single immunization, we found a seroprotection rate of 77.4% and seroconversion rate of 67.7%. After two immunizations the rates increased significantly to seroprotection rate of 97.7% and seroconversion rate of 86.7%.

Conclusion

A single dose of AS03-adjuvanted pandemic influenza A (H1N1) vaccine created an adequate immune response in HIV infected patients lasting as long as 4–9 months. Two doses improved the immunogenicity further.     

Safety and immunogenicity of adjuvanted inactivated split-virion and whole-virion influenza A (H5N1) vaccines in children: A phase I–II randomized trial

Objective

Highly pathogenic avian influenza A virus H5N1 has the potential to cause a pandemic. Many prototype pandemic influenza A (H5N1) vaccines had been developed and well evaluated in adults in recent years. However, data in children are limited. Herein we evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of adjuvanted split-virion and whole-virion H5N1 vaccines in children.

Methods

An open-labelled phase I trial was conducted in children aged 3–11 years to receive aluminum-adjuvated, split-virion H5N1 vaccine (5–30 μg) and in children aged 12–17 years to receive aluminum-adjuvated, whole-virion H5N1 vaccine (5–15 μg). Safety of the two formulations was assessed. Then a randomized phase II trial was conducted, in which 141 children aged 3–11 years received the split-virion vaccine (10 or 15 μg) and 280 children aged 12–17 years received the split-virion vaccine (10–30 μg) or the whole-virion vaccine (5 μg). Serum samples were collected for hemagglutination-inhibition (HI) assays.

Findings

5–15 μg adjuvated split-virion vaccines were well tolerated in children aged 3–11 years and 5–30 μg adjuvated split-virion vaccines and 5 μg adjuvated whole-virion vaccine were well tolerated in children aged 12–17 years. Most local and systemic reactions were mild or moderate. Before vaccination, all participants were immunologically naïve to H5N1 virus. Immune responses were induced after the first dose and significantly boosted after the second dose. In 3–11 years children, the 10 and 15 μg split-virion vaccine induced similar responses with 55% seroconversion and seroprotection (HI titer ≥1:40) rates. In 12–17 years children, the 30 μg split-virion vaccine induced the highest immune response with 71% seroconversion and seroprotection rates. The 5 μg whole-virion vaccine induced higher response than the 10 μg split-virion vaccine did.

Interpretation

The aluminum-adjuvanted, split-virion prototype pandemic influenza A (H5N1) vaccine showed good safety and immunogenicity in children and 30 μg dose induced immune response complying with European Union licensure criteria. [ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT00900588 and NCT00900991].     

Responses to live attenuated influenza vaccine in children vaccinated previously with Pandemrix (ASO3B adjuvanted pandemic A/H1N1pdm09)

BackgroundWe report a phase III/IV open-label study on the immunogenicity of a single dose of a Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine (LAIV) (Fluenz™) in children naïve to, or in previous receipt of, AS03_B adjuvanted A/H1N1pdm09 influenza vaccine (Pandemrix™), to investigate whether early exposure to an adjuvanted subunit influenza vaccine impacts on subsequent response to quadrivalent LAIV (qLAIV).Method and findingsEligible children were enrolled to receive qLAIV and stratified according to previous Pandemrix™ vaccination. Functional antibody for the vaccine strains were analysed using Haemagglutination Inhibition (HAI); in addition antibodies to the A/H1N1pdm09 strain were measured by Neuraminidase Antibody Inhibition (NAI) and neutralisation assays. Fourfold titre increases by HAI were observed for 39% (95% confidence interval 33–46%) and 43% (37–51%) of subjects for the two influenza B vaccine strains and 8% (5–13%) for the A/H3N2 strain with no significant differences between the Pandemrix™ naïve or previously vaccinated groups in antibody tites pre- or post-vaccination or seroconversion rates. In both groups, the response to the qLAIV A/H1N1pdm09 component was barely detectable, overall HAI seroconversion rate 1.8% (0.5–4.7%). Previous receipt of Pandemrix™ was associated with significantly higher levels of A/H1N1pdm09 neutralising antibody, but decreased NAI titres pre-vaccination, with the differences maintained post-vaccination.ConclusionPrevious receipt of Pandemrix™ has had a significant impact on the influenza immune status of children several years later. Higher levels of neutralising antibody to A/H1N1pdm09 pre- and post-vaccination, but significantly lower levels of antibody to NA, were observed compared with Pandemrix™-naïve children, while responses to influenza B and A/H3N2 and antibody levels prior to vaccination were similar in both groups. This suggests that early vaccination with a powerful adjuvant maintains functional immunity for several years, which prevents natural infection. Alternatively, the AS03_B adjuvant may have re-directed the immune response, with focus towards viral HA and away from viral NA.     

The incidence of narcolepsy in Europe: Before,during, and after the influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 pandemic and vaccination campaigns

Background

In August 2010 reports of a possible association between exposure to AS03 adjuvanted pandemic A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccine and occurrence of narcolepsy in children and adolescents emerged in Sweden and Finland. In response to this signal, the background rates of narcolepsy in Europe were assessed to rapidly provide information for signal verification.

Methods

We used a dynamic retrospective cohort study to assess the narcolepsy diagnosis rates during the period 2000–2010 using large linked automated health care databases in six countries: Denmark, Finland, Italy, the Netherlands, Sweden and the United Kingdom.

Results

Overall, 2608 narcolepsy cases were identified in almost 280 million person years (PY) of follow up. The pooled incidence rate was 0.93 (95% CI: 0. 90–0.97) per 100,000 PY. There were peaks between 15 and 30 year of age (women > men) and around 60 years of age. In the age group 5–19 years olds rates were increased after the start of pandemic vaccination compared to the period before the start of campaigns, with rate ratios (RR) of 1.9 (95% CI: 1.1–3.1) in Denmark, 6.4 (95% CI: 4.2–9.7) in Finland and 7.5 (95% CI: 5.2–10.7) in Sweden. Cases verification in the Netherlands had a significant effect on the pattern of incidence over time.

Conclusions

The results of this incidence study provided useful information for signal verification on a population level. The safety signal of increased narcolepsy diagnoses following the start of the pandemic vaccination campaign as observed in Sweden and Finland could be observed with this approach. An increase in narcolepsy diagnoses was not observed in other countries, where vaccination coverage was low in the affected age group, or did not follow influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccination. Patient level analyses in these countries are being conducted to verify the signal in more detail.     

Safety and immunogenicity of a virus-like particle pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 vaccine: Results from a double-blinded,randomized Phase I clinical trial in healthy Asian volunteers

Methods

A novel, fully bacterially produced recombinant virus-like particle (VLP) based influenza vaccine (gH1-Qbeta) against A/California/07/2009(H1N1) was tested in a double-blind, randomized phase I clinical trial at two clinical sites in Singapore. The trial evaluated the immunogenicity and safety of gH1-Qbeta in the presence or absence of alhydrogel adjuvant. Healthy adult volunteers with no or low pre-existing immunity against A/California/07/2009 (H1N1) were randomized to receive two intramuscular injections 21 days apart, with 100 μg vaccine, containing 42 μg hemagglutinin antigen. Antibody responses were measured before and 21 days after each immunization by hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) assays. The primary endpoint was seroconversion on Day 42, defined as percentage of subjects which reach a HAI titer ≥40 or achieve an at least 4-fold rise in HAI titer (with pre-existing immunity). The co-secondary endpoints were safety and seroconversion on Day 21.

Results

A total of 84 Asian volunteers were enrolled in this study and randomized to receive the adjuvanted (n = 43) or the non-adjuvanted (n = 41) vaccine. Of those, 43 and 37 respectively (95%) completed the study. There were no deaths or serious adverse events reported during this trial. A total of 535 adverse events occurred during treatment with 49.5% local solicited symptoms, of mostly (76.4%) mild severity. The most common treatment-related systemic symptom was fatigue. The non-adjuvanted vaccine met all primary and secondary endpoints and showed seroconversion in 62.2% and 70.3% of participants respectively on Day 21 and Day 42. While the adjuvanted vaccine showed an increased seroconversion from 25.5% (Day 21) to 51.2% (Day 42), it did not meet the immunogenicity endpoint.

Conclusion

In summary, non-adjuvanted gH1-Qbeta showed similar antibody mediated immunogenicity and a comparable safety profile in healthy humans to commercially available vaccines. These results warrant the consideration of this VLP vaccine platform for the vaccination against influenza infection (HSA CTC1300092).     

No association between influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccination and narcolepsy in South Korea: An ecological study

Background

There is concern about a possible association between influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccination and narcolepsy. In this study, we assessed the incidence and incidence rate of narcolepsy in the South Korean population before and after the implementation of an A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccination campaign to see if vaccination led to a change in the occurrence of narcolepsy.

Methods

We conducted an ecological study, comparing incident cases and incidence rates for newly diagnosed narcolepsy case-patients in South Korea, between July 2006 and June 2011. We used data from the Health Insurance Review Agency and Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which have limited information on case ascertainment. During vaccination campaign period, South Korea used non-adjuvanted and MF59-adjuvanted A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccines.

Results

Generally, incidence rate was highest in prepandemic period. No trend toward increase in the incidence of narcolepsy after pandemic period was found. Observation of incidence by season did not suggest any time pattern for occurrence of narcolepsy.

Conclusion

No increase in cases or incidence rate for narcolepsy during the A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccination campaign was found in South Korea. Our data do not support the use of MF59-adjuvanted or non-adjuvanted A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccine as a trigger for narcolepsy on a population level.