Long‐term outcomes in patients with restrictive filling following ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction

This study evaluated the effect of restrictive filling pattern (RFP) on 5‐year outcomes in patients following ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). A hundred STEMI patients treated either by rescue or primary percutaneous coronary intervention with an echocardiogram performed within 6 weeks of STEMI comprised the study group. Creatinine kinase (CK) and left ventricular ejection fraction were independent determinants of RFP, and RFP was an independent predictor of cardiac and all‐cause mortality at median follow up of 5 years.     

墓碑形ST段抬高对心肌梗死范围及近期预后的影响

目的　探讨心电图墓碑形 ST段抬高对心肌梗死范围及预后的影响。方法　根据心电图 ST段抬高形式 ,将170例急性 ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者分为墓碑形组 5 2例 ,非墓碑形组 118例 ,比较两组心电图 ST段抬高振幅、QRS记分、血清肌酸激酶 (CK )及其同工酶 (CK - MB)峰值 ,并对其 4周内心脏事件进行分析。结果　墓碑形组 ST段抬高的振幅、QRS记分、CK和 CK- MB峰值均显著高于非墓碑形组 (P<0 .0 1)。墓碑形组心源性休克、心力衰竭、心室颤动和病死率分别为 11.5 4 %、4 2 .31%、2 6 .92 %和 19.2 3%,均高于非墓碑形组 2 .5 4 %、2 4 .5 8%、12 .71%和6 .78%(P<0 .0 5 )。 L ogistic回归分析结果显示 ,墓碑形 ST段抬高与心源性休克、心力衰竭、心室颤动和死亡危险独立相关 (OR分别为 1.880、1.5 73、2 .2 75和 3.0 6 4 ;均 P<0 .0 5 )。结论　墓碑形 ST段抬高提示心肌梗死范围大 ,是预后不良的独立预测指标。     

The impact of successful revascularization of coronary chronic total occlusions on long‐term clinical outcomes in patients with non‐ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to assess the long‐term clinical impact of revascularization of coronary concomitant coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) in patients with Non‐ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).

Background

CTO is associated with poorer prognosis in patients with NSTEMI. The evidence of revascularization of CTO in patients with NSTEMI is still conflicting.

Methods

Consecutive patients with NSTEMI and CTO who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within 72 h of admission from 2006 to 2015 were retrospectively recruited and analyzed. A total of 967 patients underwent PCI for NSTEMI. Among them, 106 (11%) patients had concomitant CTO and were recruited for analysis. CTO lesions were revascularized successfully in 67 (63.2%) patients (successful CTO PCI group), while the CTO in the remaining 39 patients were either not attempted or failed (No/failed CTO PCI group).

Results

The 30‐day cardiac death and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were significantly lower in the successful CTO PCI group (both cardiac death and MACE were 3% vs 30%, P < 0.001, respectively). A landmark analysis set at 30th day for 30‐day survivals was performed. After a mean of 2.5‐year follow‐up, the long‐term cardiac death was still significantly lower (16.9% vs 42.3%, P < 0.001), whereas the MACE showed a trend toward lower incidence (26.2% vs 40.7%, P = 0.051) in the successful CTO PCI group. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, successful revascularization of CTO is an independent protective predictor for long‐term cardiac death (HR 0.310, 95% CI, 0.109‐0.881, P = 0.028) in all population and in propensity‐score matched cohort (P = 0.007).

Conclusions

Successful revascularization of CTO was associated with reduced risk of long‐term cardiac death in patients with NSTEMI and concomitant CTO.

     

Clinical impact of complete atrioventricular block in patients with ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction

Complete atrioventricular block (CAVB) is a common complication of ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Although STEMI patients complicated with CAVB had a higher mortality in the thrombolytic era, little is known about the impact of CAVB on STEMI patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The study aimed at evaluating the clinical impact of CAVB on STEMI patients in the primary PCI era. We consecutively enrolled 1295 STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI within 24 hours from onset. Patients were divided into two groups according to the infarct location: anterior STEMI (n = 640) and nonanterior STEMI (n = 655). The outcomes were all‐cause death and major adverse cardiocerebrovascular events (MACCE) with a median follow‐up period of 3.8 (1.7–6.6) years. Eighty‐one patients (6.3%) developed CAVB. The incidence of CAVB was lower in anterior STEMI patients than in nonanterior STEMI (1.7% vs 10.7%, p < .05). Anterior STEMI patients with CAVB had a higher incidence of all‐cause deaths (82% vs 20%, p < .05) and MACCE (82% vs 25%, p < .05) than those without CAVB. Although higher incidence of all‐cause deaths was found more in nonanterior STEMI patients with CAVB compared with those without CAVB (30% vs 18%, p < .05), there was no significant difference in the incidence of MACCE (24% vs 19%). Multivariate analysis showed that CAVB was an independent predictor for all‐cause mortality and MACCE in anterior STEMI patients, but not in nonanterior STEMI. CAVB is rare in anterior STEMI patients, but remains a poor prognostic complication even in the primary PCI era.     

Safety and feasibility of low‐dose ticagrelor in patients with ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction

BackgroundPrevious studies have confirmed the safety and feasibility of half‐dose ticagrelor in Chinese patients with acute coronary syndrome, but currently there is no plan for the use of ticagrelor for Chinese ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients.HypothesisIt is safe and feasible of low‐dose ticagrelor in patients with STEMI.MethodsThe STEMI patients who were undergoing emergency intervention and taking ticagrelor were enrolled. Patients whose level of platelet aggregation rate (PAR) less than 30% after 7‐day treatment with standard‐dose ticagrelor were randomly divided into low‐dose group (LD group, 45 mg twice daily) and standard‐dose group (SD group, 90 mg twice daily). The changes of levels of platelet parameters were compared between the two groups. The incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), bleeding events were compared between the two groups within 6 months of follow‐up.ResultsThe levels of PAR in the SD group decreased compared with baseline, and was lower than those of LD group at the same time point. The levels of platelet distribution width in both groups decreased from the baseline values (all p < .05) at 1, 3, and 6 months after grouping treatment, but there was no significant difference between the two groups. The incidence of MACE was similar between the two groups of patients. There were decreasing trends in the incidences of minimal bleeding event, minor bleeding event, dyspnea, and gout in the LD group.ConclusionIt is safe and feasible of low‐dose ticagrelor for patients with STEMI based on the monitoring of PAR.     

Feasibility and applicability of computer‐assisted myocardial blush quantification after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction

Objectives : The aim of the study was to evaluate whether the “Quantitative Blush Evaluator” (QuBE) score is associated with measures of myocardial reperfusion in patients with ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated in two hospitals with 24/7 coronary intervention facilities. Background : QuBE is an open source computer program to quantify myocardial perfusion. Although QuBE has shown to be practical and feasible in the patients enrolled in the Thrombus Aspiration during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Myocardial Infarction Study (TAPAS), QuBE has not yet been verified on reperfusion outcomes of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) patients treated in other catheterization laboratories. Methods : Core lab adjudicated angiographic outcomes and QuBE values were assessed on angiograms of patients who were enrolled in the PRoximal Embolic Protection in Acute myocardial infarction and Resolution of ST‐Elevation (PREPARE) trial. ST‐segment resolution immediately after PCI measured by continuous ST Holter monitoring was calculated by a blinded core lab. Results : The QuBE score could be assessed on 229 of the 284 angiograms (81%) and was significantly associated with visually assessed myocardial blush grade (P < 0.0001). Patients with improved postprocedural Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction‐graded flow, myocardial blush grade, ST‐segment resolution immediately after PCI, or a small infarct size measured by peak CK‐MB had a significant better QuBE score. Conclusions : QuBE is feasible and applicable at angiograms of patients with STEMI recorded at other catheterization laboratories and is associated with measures of myocardial reperfusion. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Invasive and antiplatelet treatment of patients with non‐ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction: Understanding and addressing the global risk‐treatment paradox

Clinical guidelines for the treatment of patients with non‐ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) recommend an invasive strategy with cardiac catheterization, revascularization when clinically appropriate, and initiation of dual antiplatelet therapy regardless of whether the patient receives revascularization. However, although patients with NSTEMI have a higher long‐term mortality risk than patients with ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), they are often treated less aggressively; with those who have the highest ischemic risk often receiving the least aggressive treatment (the “treatment‐risk paradox”). Here, using evidence gathered from across the world, we examine some reasons behind the suboptimal treatment of patients with NSTEMI, and recommend approaches to address this issue in order to improve the standard of healthcare for this group of patients. The challenges for the treatment of patients with NSTEMI can be categorized into four “P” factors that contribute to poor clinical outcomes: patient characteristics being heterogeneous; physicians underestimating the high ischemic risk compared with bleeding risk; procedure availability; and policy within the healthcare system. To address these challenges, potential approaches include: developing guidelines and protocols that incorporate rigorous definitions of NSTEMI; risk assessment and integrated quality assessment measures; providing education to physicians on the management of long‐term cardiovascular risk in patients with NSTEMI; and making stents and antiplatelet therapies more accessible to patients.     

A randomized study of prourokinase during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction

Objectives

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intracoronary administration of prourokinase via balloon catheter during primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in patients with acute ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

Methods

Acute STEMI patients underwent primary PCI were randomly divided into two groups: intracoronary prourokinase (IP) group (n = 118) and control group (n = 112). During primary PCI, prourokinase or saline were injected to the distal end of the culprit lesion via balloon catheter after balloon catheter dilatation. Demographic and clinical characteristics, infarct size, myocardial reperfusion, and cardiac functions were evaluated and compared between two groups. Hemorrhagic complications and MACE occurred in the 6‐months follow up were recorded.

Results

No significant differences were observed between two groups with respect to baseline demographic, clinical, and angiographic characteristics (P > 0.05). In IP group, more patients had complete ST segment resolution (>70%) compared with control group (P < 0.05). Patients in IP group showed lower levels of serum CK, CK‐MB and TnI, and a much higher myocardial blood flow (MBF) than those in control group (P < 0.05). No significant differences of TIMI major or minor bleeding complications were observed between the two groups (P > 0.05). At 6‐months follow‐up, there was a trend that patients in the IP group had a less chance to have MACE, though it was not statistically different (8.5% vs 12.5%, P > 0.05).

Conclusions

Intracoronary administration of prourokinase via balloon catheter during primary PCI effectively improved myocardial perfusion in STEMI patients.