A noninferiority design for a delayed calcineurin inhibitor substitution trial in kidney transplantation

Improving long-term kidney transplant outcomes requires novel treatment strategies, including delayed calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) substitution, tested using informative trial designs. An alternative approach to the usual superiority-based trial is a noninferiority trial design that tests whether an investigational agent is not unacceptably worse than standard of care. An informative noninferiority design, with biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) as the endpoint, requires determination of a prespecified, evidence-based noninferiority margin for BPAR. No such information is available for delayed CNI substitution in kidney transplantation. Herein we analyzed data from recent kidney transplant trials of CNI withdrawal and “real world” CNI- based standard of care, containing subjects with well-documented evidence of immune quiescence at 6 months posttransplant—ideal candidates for delayed CNI substitution. Our analysis indicates an evidence-based noninferiority margin of 13.8% for the United States Food and Drug Administration's composite definition of BPAR between 6 and 24 months posttransplant. Sample size estimation determined that ~225 randomized subjects would be required to evaluate noninferiority for this primary clinical efficacy endpoint, and superiority for a renal function safety endpoint. Our findings provide the basis for future delayed CNI substitution noninferiority trials, thereby increasing the likelihood they will provide clinically implementable results and achieve regulatory approval.     

Comparing everolimus‐based immunosuppression with reduction or withdrawal of calcineurin inhibitor reduction from 6 months after heart transplantation: The randomized MANDELA study

In the 12‐month, open‐label MANDELA study, patients were randomized at month 6 after heart transplantation to (1) convert to calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)‐free immunosuppression with everolimus (EVR), mycophenolic acid and steroids (CNI‐free, n = 71), or to (2) continue reduced‐exposure CNI, with EVR and steroids (EVR/redCNI, n = 74). Tacrolimus was administered in 48.8% of EVR/redCNI patients and 52.6% of CNI‐free patients at randomization. Both strategies improved and stabilized renal function based on the primary endpoint (estimated GFR at month 18 posttransplant postrandomization) with superiority of the CNI‐free group vs EVR/redCNI: mean 64.1 mL/min/1.73 m² vs 52.9 mL/min/1.73 m²; difference + 11.3 mL/min/1.73 m² (P < .001). By month 18, estimated GFR had increased by ≥ 10 mL/min/1.73 m² in 31.8% and 55.2% of EVR/redCNI and CNI‐free patients, respectively, and by ≥ 25 mL/min/1.73 m² in 4.5% and 20.9%. Rates of biopsy‐proven acute rejection (BPAR) were 6.8% and 21.1%; all cases were without hemodynamic compromise. BPAR was less frequent with EVR/redCNI vs the CNI‐free regimen (P = .015); 6 of 15 episodes in CNI‐free patients occurred with EVR concentration < 5 ng/mL. Rates of adverse events and associated discontinuations were comparable. EVR/redCNI from month 6 achieved stable renal function with infrequent BPAR. One‐year renal function can be improved by early conversion to EVR‐based CNI‐free therapy but requires close EVR monitoring. Clinical trials registry: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00862979.     

Graft dysfunction in simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation (SPK): Results of concurrent kidney and pancreas allograft biopsies

Simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplants offer significant therapeutic advantages but present a diagnostic approach dilemma in the diagnosis of rejection. Because both organs are from the same donor, the kidney has been treated traditionally as the “sentinel” organ to biopsy, presumably representing the status of both allografts. Truly concurrent biopsy studies, however, are needed to confirm this hypothesis. We examined 101 concurrent biopsies from 70 patients with dysfunction in either or both organs. Results showed concurrent rejection in 23 of 57 (40%) of cases with rejection; 19 of 57 (33.5%) and 15 of 57 (26.5%) showed kidney or pancreas only rejection, respectively. The degree and type of rejection differed in the majority (13 of 23, 56.5%) of cases with concurrent rejection, with the pancreas more often showing higher rejection grade. Taking into account pancreas dysfunction, a positive kidney biopsy should correctly predict pancreas rejection in 86% of the instances. However, the lack of complete concordance between the 2 organs, the discrepancies in grade and type of rejection, and the tendency for higher rejection grades in concurrent or pancreas only rejections, all support the rationale for pancreas biopsies. The latter provide additional data on the overall status of the organ, as well as information on nonrejection‐related pathologies.     

Early conversion of pediatric kidney transplant patients to everolimus with reduced tacrolimus and steroid elimination: Results of a randomized trial

In a 12‐month, multicenter, open‐label study, 106 children were randomized at 4 to 6 weeks after kidney transplantation to switch to everolimus with reduced TAC (EVR/rTAC) and steroid elimination from month 5 posttransplant or to continue standard tacrolimus with mycophenolate mofetil (sTAC/MMF) and steroids. The cumulative incidence of a co‐primary efficacy end point (biopsy‐proven acute rejection [BPAR], graft loss, or death from randomization to month 12) was 10.3% with EVR/rTAC and 5.8% with sTAC/MMF (difference 4.4%; P = .417). BPAR occurred in 9.6% and 5.6% of patients, respectively. Patient and renal allograft survival were 100%. The co‐primary end point of mean estimated glomerular filtration rate at month 12 was 76.2 mL/min/1.73 m² with EVR/rTAC and 72.5 mL/min/1.73 m² for sTAC/MMF (difference 3.8 mL/min/1.73m²; P = .49). One EVR/rTAC patient developed posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease. Longitudinal growth and sexual maturation were equivalent between groups. The randomized drug regimen was discontinued in 34.6% and 13% of patients in the EVR/rTAC and sTAC/MMF groups, respectively (P = .024), and discontinued due to adverse events/infections in 25.0% and 11.1% of patients (P = .062). In conclusion, early conversion of pediatric kidney transplant patients from TAC, MMF, and steroids to EVR/rTAC and steroid withdrawal maintains immunosuppressive efficacy and preserves renal function.     

Sirolimus vs mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in primary combined pancreas and kidney transplantation. Results of a long‐term prospective randomized study

The study was intended to compare pancreas graft survival rates in two groups of pancreas and kidney transplant recipients prospectively randomized to treatment either with sirolimus or MMF. From 2002 to 2013, 238 type 1 diabetic recipients with end‐stage kidney disease were randomized 1:1 to sirolimus or MMF treatment. Noncensored pancreas survival at 5 years was 76.4 and 71.6% for sirolimus and MMF groups, respectively (P > .05). Death‐censored pancreas survival was better in the sirolimus group (P = .037). After removal of early graft losses pancreas survival did not differ between groups (MMF 83.1% vs sirolimus 91.6%, P = .11). Nonsignificantly more grafts were lost due to rejection in the MMF group (10 vs 5; P = .19). Cumulative patient 5‐year survival was 96% in the MMF group and 91% in the sirolimus group (P > .05). Five‐year cumulative noncensored kidney graft survival rates did not statistically differ (85.6% in the sirolimus group and 88.8% in MMF group). Recipients treated with MMF had significantly more episodes of gastrointestinal bleeding (7 vs 0, P = .007). More recipients in the sirolimus group required corrective surgery due to incisional hernias (21 vs 12, P = .019). ClinicalTrials No.: NCT 03582878.     

Efficacy and safety of bleselumab in kidney transplant recipients: A phase 2, randomized,open‐label,noninferiority study

This study assessed the efficacy and safety of the anti‐CD40 monoclonal antibody bleselumab (ASKP1240) in de novo kidney transplant recipients over 36 months posttransplant. Transplant recipients were randomized (1:1:1) to standard of care (SoC: 0.1 mg/kg per day immediate‐release tacrolimus [IR‐TAC]; target minimum blood concentration [C_trough] 4‐11 ng/mL plus 1 g mycophenolate mofetil [MMF] twice daily) or bleselumab (200 mg on days 0/7/14/28/42/56/70/90, and monthly thereafter) plus either MMF or IR‐TAC (0.1 mg/kg per day; target C_trough 4‐11 ng/mL days 0‐30, then 2‐5 ng/mL). All received basiliximab induction (20 mg pretransplant and on days 3‐5 posttransplant) and corticosteroids. One hundred thirty‐eight transplant recipients received ≥1 dose of study drug (SoC [n = 48]; bleselumab + MMF [n = 46]; bleselumab + IR‐TAC [n = 44]). For the primary endpoint (incidence of biopsy‐proven acute rejection [BPAR] at 6 months), bleselumab + IR‐TAC was noninferior to SoC (difference 2.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI] ?8.1% to 13.8%), and bleselumab + MMF did not demonstrate noninferiority to SoC (difference 30.7%; 95% CI 15.2%‐46.2%). BPAR incidence slightly increased through month 36 in all groups, with bleselumab + IR‐TAC continuing to demonstrate noninferiority to SoC. Bleselumab had a favorable benefit–risk ratio. Most treatment‐emergent adverse events were as expected for kidney transplant recipients (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01780844).     

Tacrolimus‐ versus sirolimus‐based immunosuppression after simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation: 5‐year results of a randomized trial

Tacrolimus, the cornerstone immunosuppression after simultaneous pancreas and ‐kidney (SPK) transplantation, may exert nephrotoxic and diabetogenic effects. We therefore prospectively compared in an open‐label, randomized, monocentric, 5‐year follow‐up study, a tacrolimus‐ and a sirolimus‐based immunosuppressive regimen. Randomization using the block method allowing a blind allocation was done at the time of surgery. All patients received anti‐thymocyte globulin and maintenance therapy with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. At month 3, tacrolimus was continued or replaced by sirolimus. The primary endpoint was kidney and pancreas graft survival at 1 and 5 years. Fifty patients were included in the final analysis in each group. At 1 year, differences for kidney and pancreas graft survival between sirolimus and tacrolimus were 0% (90% confidence interval ?4.61% to 4.61%) and 6% (90% confidence interval ?6.32% to 18.32%), respectively. There was no difference in renal and pancreas graft survival at 5 years. Thirty‐four patients (68%) in the sirolimus group vs three (6%) in the tacrolimus group needed definitive withdrawal of the study drug. Despite noninferiority of sirolimus compared to tacrolimus for kidney and pancreas graft survival, the high rate of sirolimus discontinuation does not favor its use as cornerstone therapy after SPK transplantation (NCT00693446).     

Abatacept as rescue immunosuppression after calcineurin inhibitor treatment failure in renal transplantation

A majority of kidney transplant recipients receive calcineurin inhibitor‐based immunosuppression. However, some do not tolerate calcineurin inhibitors and require other immunosuppressive strategies. Until recently, alternative approaches have been associated with inferior outcomes, but recent methods have effectively utilized belatacept in calcineurin inhibitor‐intolerant patients. Though promising, belatacept uptake has been limited by higher acute rejection rates, unavailability due to production shortages, and logistical challenges as a result of intravenous infusion requirements. Interestingly, its predecessor abatacept is clinically available in subcutaneous formulation to treat autoimmune disorders but has not been used in clinical transplantation. Here we report on a series of 9 calcineurin inhibitor‐intolerant transplant recipients converted to abatacept early after transplant as rescue immunosuppression during periods of belatacept unavailability. Retrospective review revealed successful allograft salvage and 100% patient and graft survival (median 115 months) after conversion to abatacept. Patients received abatacept for a median duration of 82 months with stable, long‐term renal allograft function, a single cellular rejection episode, and no clinically apparent protective immunity concerns. Hence our findings suggest that future clinical studies utilizing abatacept either de novo or as conversion therapy in transplant recipients should be considered.     

Belatacept‐based immunosuppression with simultaneous calcineurin inhibitor avoidance and early corticosteroid withdrawal: A prospective,randomized multicenter trial

Simultaneous calcineurin inhibitor avoidance (CNIA) and early corticosteroid withdrawal (ESW) have not been achieved primarily due to excessive acute rejection. This trial compared 2 belatacept‐based CNIA/ESW regimens with a tacrolimus‐based ESW regimen. Kidney transplant recipients were randomized to receive alemtuzumab/belatacept, rabbit anti‐thymocyte globulin (rATG)/belatacept, or rATG/tacrolimus. The combinatorial primary endpoint consisted of patient death, renal allograft loss, or a Modification of Diet in Renal Disease–calculated eGFR of <45 mL/min/1.73 m² at 12 months. Results are reported by treatment group (alemtuzumab/belatacept, rATG/belatacept, and rATG/tacrolimus). Superiority was not observed at 1 year for the primary endpoint (9/107 [8.4%], 15/104 [14.4%], and 14/105 [13.3%], respectively; P = NS) for either belatacept‐based regimen. Differences were not observed for secondary endpoints (death, death‐censored graft loss, or estimated glomerular filtration rates < 45 mL/min/1.73 m²). Differences were observed in biopsy‐proved acute cellular rejection (10.3%, 18.3%, and 1.9%, respectively) (P < .001), but not in antibody‐mediated rejection, mixed acute rejection, or de novo donor‐specific anti‐HLA antibodies. Neurologic and electrolyte abnormality adverse events were less frequent under belatacept. Belatacept‐based CNIA/ESW regimens did not prove to be superior for the primary or secondary endpoints. Belatacept‐treated patients demonstrated an increase in biopsy‐proved acute cellular rejection and reduced neurologic and metabolic adverse events. These results demonstrate that simultaneous CNIA/ESW is feasible without excessive acute rejection.     

Prospective randomized study of conversion from tacrolimus to cyclosporine A to improve glucose metabolism in patients with posttransplant diabetes mellitus after renal transplantation

Tacrolimus (TAC) increases the risk of posttransplant diabetes (PTDM) compared with cyclosporine A (CYC). The present 12‐month, multicenter, investigator‐driven, prospective, randomized study was designed to assess whether conversion from tacrolimus to CYC can reverse PTDM after renal transplantation. Predominantly white patients with PTDM according to the 2005 American Diabetes Association criteria were randomized to either replacement of TAC with CYC or continuation of their TAC‐based regimen after stratification for type of glucose‐lowering therapy, steroid therapy, and hepatitis C status. At 12 months, 14 of 41 patients with complete data in the CYC arm (34%; 95%CI 19%‐49%) were free of diabetes, whereas this was the case in only 4 of 39 patients (10%; 95%CI 3%‐20%) in the TAC arm (P = .01). At 12 months, 39% of patients in the CYC arm were off glucose‐lowering medication vs 13% of patients in the TAC arm (P = .01). The CYC group decreased glycated hemoglobin level during the 12‐month follow‐up, resulting in significantly lower levels compared with the TAC group (6.0 ± 0.9% vs 7.1 ± 1.7% at 12 months; P = .002). In conclusion, replacement of TAC with CYC significantly improves glucose metabolism and has the potential to reverse diabetes during the first year after conversion. (EU Clinical Trials Register No. 2006‐001765‐42)     

Preformed T cell alloimmunity and HLA eplet mismatch to guide immunosuppression minimization with tacrolimus monotherapy in kidney transplantation: Results of the CELLIMIN trial

Personalizing immunosuppression is a major objective in transplantation. Transplant recipients are heterogeneous regarding their immunological memory and primary alloimmune susceptibility. This biomarker-guided trial investigated whether in low immunological-risk kidney transplants without pretransplant DSA and donor-specific T cells assessed by a standardized IFN-γ ELISPOT, low immunosuppression (LI) with tacrolimus monotherapy would be non-inferior regarding 6-month BPAR than tacrolimus-based standard of care (SOC). Due to low recruitment rates, the trial was terminated when 167 patients were enrolled. ELISPOT negatives (E−) were randomized to LI (n = 48) or SOC (n = 53), E+ received the same SOC. Six- and 12-month BPAR rates were higher among LI than SOC/E− (4/35 [13%] vs. 1/43 [2%], p = .15 and 12/48 [25%] vs. 6/53 [11.3%], p = .073, respectively). E+ patients showed similarly high BPAR rates than LI at 6 and 12 months (12/55 [22%] and 13/66 [20%], respectively). These differences were stronger in per-protocol analyses. Post-hoc analysis revealed that poor class-II eplet matching, especially DQ, discriminated E− patients, notably E−/LI, developing BPAR (4/28 [14%] low risk vs. 8/20 [40%] high risk, p = .043). Eplet mismatch also predicted anti-class-I (p = .05) and anti-DQ (p < .001) de novo DSA. Adverse events were similar, but E−/LI developed fewer viral infections, particularly polyoma-virus-associated nephropathy (p = .021). Preformed T cell alloreactivity and HLA eplet mismatch assessment may refine current baseline immune-risk stratification and guide immunosuppression decision-making in kidney transplantation.     

Lower tacrolimus exposure and time in therapeutic range increase the risk of de novo donor‐specific antibodies in the first year of kidney transplantation

De novo donor‐specific antibodies (dnDSAs) have been associated with reduced graft survival. Tacrolimus (TAC)–based regimens are the most common among immunosuppressive approaches used in in clinical practice today, yet an optimal therapeutic dose to prevent dnDSAs has not been established. We evaluated mean TAC C₀ (tacrolimus trough concentration) and TAC time in therapeutic range for the risk of dnDSAs in a cohort of 538 patients in the first year after kidney transplantation. A mean TAC C₀ < 8 ng/mL was associated with dnDSAs by 6 months (odds ratio [OR] 2.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.32–4.79, P = .005) and by 12 months (OR 2.32, 95% CI 1.30–4.15, P = .004), and there was a graded increase in risk with lower mean TAC C₀. TAC time in the therapeutic range of <60% was associated with dnDSAs (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.28‐3.30, P = .003) and acute rejection (hazard ratio [HR] 4.18, 95% CI 2.31–7.58, P < .001) by 12 months and death‐censored graft loss by 5 years (HR 3.12, 95% CI 1.53–6.37, P = .002). TAC minimization may come at a cost of higher rates of dnDSAs, and TAC time in therapeutic range may be a valuable strategy to stratify patients at increased risk of adverse outcomes.     

Absolute quantification of donor‐derived cell‐free DNA as a marker of rejection and graft injury in kidney transplantation: Results from a prospective observational study

Donor‐derived cell‐free DNA (dd‐cfDNA) is a noninvasive biomarker for comprehensive monitoring of allograft injury and rejection in kidney transplantation (KTx). dd‐cfDNA quantification of copies/mL plasma (dd‐cfDNA[cp/mL]) was compared to dd‐cfDNA fraction (dd‐cfDNA[%]) at prespecified visits in 189 patients over 1 year post KTx. In patients (N = 15, n = 22 samples) with biopsy‐proven rejection (BPR), median dd‐cfDNA(cp/mL) was 3.3‐fold and median dd‐cfDNA(%) 2.0‐fold higher (82 cp/mL; 0.57%, respectively) than medians in Stable Phase patients (N = 83, n = 408) without rejection (25 cp/mL; 0.29%). Results for acute tubular necrosis (ATN) were not significantly different from those with biopsy‐proven rejection (BPR). dd‐cfDNA identified unnecessary biopsies triggered by a rise in plasma creatinine. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed superior performance (P = .02) of measuring dd‐cfDNA(cp/mL) (AUC = 0.83) compared to dd‐cfDNA(%) (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.73). Diagnostic odds ratios were 7.31 for dd‐cfDNA(cp/mL), and 6.02 for dd‐cfDNA(%) at thresholds of 52 cp/mL and 0.43%, respectively. Plasma creatinine showed a low correlation (r = 0.37) with dd‐cfDNA(cp/mL). In a patient subset (N = 24) there was a significantly higher rate of patients with elevated dd‐cfDNA(cp/mL) with lower tacrolimus levels (<8 μg/L) compared to the group with higher tacrolimus concentrations (P = .0036) suggesting that dd‐cfDNA may detect inadequate immunosuppression resulting in subclinical graft damage. Absolute dd‐cfDNA(cp/mL) allowed for better discrimination than dd‐cfDNA(%) of KTx patients with BPR and is useful to avoid unnecessary biopsies.     

Late pancreatic panniculitis in a simultaneous pancreas kidney transplant patient with failed allografts

We present a rare case of pancreatic panniculitis in a 59‐year‐old male simultaneous pancreas–kidney (SPK) recipient with failed allografts. The patient presented with fever and painful erythematous nodules on his leg 1 month after stopping all immunosuppression. A thorough infectious and rheumatological workup was negative. He had pancreas rejection 4 years after SKP transplant and was restarted on dialysis after 14 years when his renal allograft failed due to chronic allograft nephropathy. His chronic immunosuppression (tacrolimus, azathioprine) was stopped and prednisone was weaned over 3 months at that time. A skin biopsy revealed saponification of the subcutaneous fat with inflammation pathognomonic of pancreatic panniculitis. Concurrent allograft pancreatitis confirmed with elevated lipase and a computed tomography scan finding of peripancreatic graft stranding and atrophic native pancreas. He was started on pulse steroid therapy for 3 days followed by oral taper. This resulted in dramatic resolution of all skin lesions and normalization of lipase levels within 1 week, followed by resumption of low‐dose tacrolimus and azathioprine. This is an extremely rare occurrence of panniculitis in pancreas allograft after 10 years of pancreatic failure associated with stopping immunosuppression.     

Adequate tacrolimus exposure modulates the impact of HLA class II molecular mismatch: a validation study in an American cohort

Clinicians have few tools to predict the risk of alloimmune injury that would guide immunosuppression management in renal transplant patients. We evaluated human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR/DQ molecular mismatch to predict de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) during the first year of transplant and explored how differences in tacrolimus exposure may modulate this risk. HLA-DR and -DQ eplet mismatches were determined between 444 donor-recipient pairs in Denver, Colorado between 2007 and 2013. Previously defined mismatch thresholds stratified recipients into low- (N = 119), intermediate- (N = 153), and high- (N = 172) risk categories. The area under the curve for DSA at 1 year was 0.84 and 0.82 for HLA-DR and HLA-DQ eplet mismatches, respectively. Compared to low-risk patients, there was a graded increase in risk of DR/DQ DSA in intermediate (HR 15.39, 95% CI 2.01-118.09, p = .009) and high-risk (HR 23.81, 95% CI 3.17-178.66, p = 0.002) categories. Intermediate- and high-risk patients with a mean tacrolimus <6 ng/ml versus >8 ng/ml had increased risk of DR/DQ DSA at 1 year (HR 2.34, 95% CI 1.05-5.22, p = .04). HLA molecular mismatch represents a reproducible, objective, and clinically relevant tool to stratify patients by alloimmune risk and may help guide personalized immunosuppression management.     

Campath,calcineurin inhibitor reduction,and chronic allograft nephropathy (the 3C Study) – results of a randomized controlled clinical trial

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs, eg, tacrolimus) reduce short‐term kidney transplant failure, but chronic nephrotoxicity may contribute to late transplant loss. Elective conversion to inhibitors of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR, eg, sirolimus) pathway might avoid long‐term CNI renal damage and improve outcomes. The 3C Study was a pragmatic randomized controlled trial of sequential randomizations between alemtuzumab and basiliximab induction therapy (at the time of surgery) and between tacrolimus and sirolimus maintenance therapy at 6 months posttransplantation. The primary outcome of this analysis was estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 18 months after maintenance therapy randomization; 197 patients were assigned sirolimus‐based and 197 to tacrolimus‐based therapy. Allocation to sirolimus had no significant effect on eGFR at 18 months: baseline‐adjusted mean (SEM) eGFR was 53.7 (0.9) mL/min/1.73 m² in the sirolimus group versus 54.6 (0.9) mL/min/1.73 m² in the tacrolimus group (P = .50). Biopsy‐proven acute rejection (29 [14.7%]) vs 6 [3.0%]; P < .001) and serious infections (defined as opportunistic infections or those requiring hospitalization; 95 [48.2%] vs 70 [35.5%]; P = .008) were more common among participants allocated sirolimus. Compared with tacrolimus‐based therapy, sirolimus‐based maintenance therapy did not improve transplant function at 18 months after conversion and was associated with significant hazards of rejection and infection. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01120028 and ISRCTN88894088.     

Autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cell therapy with early tacrolimus withdrawal: The randomized prospective,single-center,open-label TRITON study

After renal transplantation, there is a need for immunosuppressive regimens which effectively prevent allograft rejection, while preserving renal function and minimizing side effects. From this perspective, mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) therapy is of interest. In this randomized prospective, single-center, open-label trial, we compared MSCs infused 6 and 7 weeks after renal transplantation and early tacrolimus withdrawal with a control tacrolimus group. Primary end point was quantitative evaluation of interstitial fibrosis in protocol biopsies at 4 and 24 weeks posttransplant. Secondary end points included acute rejection, graft loss, death, renal function, adverse events, and immunological responses. Seventy patients were randomly assigned of which 57 patients were included in the final analysis (29 MSC; 28 controls). Quantitative progression of fibrosis failed to show benefit in the MSC group and GFR remained stable in both groups. One acute rejection was documented (MSC group), while subclinical rejection in week 24 protocol biopsies occurred in seven patients (four MSC; three controls). In the MSC group, regulatory T cell numbers were significantly higher compared to controls (p = .014, week 24). In conclusion, early tacrolimus withdrawal with MSC therapy was safe and feasible without increased rejection and with preserved renal function. MSC therapy is a potentially useful approach after renal transplantation.     

Improving medication adherence and outcomes in adult kidney transplant patients using a personal systems approach: SystemCHANGE™ results of the MAGIC randomized clinical trial

This study determined if a SystemCHANGE? intervention was more efficacious than attention control in increasing immunosuppressive medication adherence and improving outcomes in adult kidney transplant recipients during a 6‐month intervention phase and subsequent 6‐month (no intervention) maintenance phase. The SystemCHANGE? intervention taught patients to use person‐level quality improvement strategies to link adherence to established daily routines, environmental cues, and supportive people. Eighty‐nine patients (average age 51.8 years, 58% male, 61% African American) completed the 6‐month intervention phase. Using an intent‐to‐treat analysis, at 6 months, medication adherence for SystemCHANGE? (median 0.91, IQR 0.76‐0.96) and attention control (median 0.67, IQR 0.52‐0.72) patients differed markedly (difference in medians 0.24, 95% CI 0.13‐0.30, P < .001). At the conclusion of the subsequent 6‐month maintenance phase, the gap between medication adherence for SystemCHANGE? (median 0.77, IQR 0.56‐0.94) and attention control (median 0.60, IQR 0.44‐0.73) patients remained large (difference in medians 0.17, 95% CI 0.06‐0.33, P = .004). SystemCHANGE? patients evidenced lower mean creatinine and BUN at 12 months and more infections at 6 and 12 months. This first fully powered RCT testing SystemCHANGE? to improve and maintain medication adherence in kidney transplant recipients demonstrated large, clinically meaningful improvements in medication adherence. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02416479.