Predicting outgrowth of IgE-mediated cow's milk allergy: Diagnostic tests in children under two years of age

BackgroundLimited studies conducted on children <2 years old and/or involving a skin prick test (SPT) for fresh milk (FM) have examined the predictive value of allergometric tests for outgrowth of cow's milk allergy (CMA). We investigated the optimal decision points for outgrowth (ODP^fo) with SPT for commercial cow's milk extract (CE) and FM and specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) levels for milk proteins to predict outgrowing allergy in children <2 years old.MethodsSPTs for CE and FM, tests for sIgEs (cow's milk, casein, α-lactoalbumin, β-lactoglobulin) and oral food challenges (OFC) were performed in children referred for evaluation of suspected CMA, and 15 months after diagnosis.ResultsFifty-one children (median age, 7.5 months; range, 2–23 months) were enrolled. Five had a history of anaphylaxis and 26 of 48 children with a positive initial challenge underwent milk elimination. The last OFC was performed in 28 children of whom 13 reacted to milk. The initial SPT responses to CE and FM and milk sIgE levels of the patients with persistent CMA were higher at diagnosis, with ODP^fo of 7 mm, 9 mm, and 10.5 kU/L, respectively; these values remained higher with ODP^fo of 4 mm, 11 mm, and 10.5 kU/L at the last OFC.ConclusionHigher initial SPTs for FM and CE and higher initial sIgE levels for cow's milk proteins are associated with a reduced likelihood of outgrowth. Initial milk sIgE level <10.5 kU/L and initial SPT for fresh milk <9 mm are related to the acquisition of tolerance in the follow-up period.     

Yogurt is tolerated by the majority of children with IgE-mediated cow's milk allergy

BackgroundChildren with IgE-mediated cow's milk allergy (IgE-CMA) with gastrointestinal symptoms tolerate yogurt at 100%. Yogurt tolerance in children with IgE-CMA with urticaria and anaphylaxis was 7%.MethodsWe enrolled children with IgE-CMA with cutaneous, respiratory, gastrointestinal and anaphylactic symptoms. All performed prick by prick (PbP) and oral food challenge (OFC) with yogurt. Some children performed also an OFC with CM mixed with wheat flour and baked, baked liquid CM, parmesan.Results34 children were enrolled, 31/34 (91%) with systemic adverse reaction after ingestion of CM (systemic CMA), 3/34 (9%) with isolated contact urticaria (ICU CMA). PbP with yogurt was negative only in one patient. OFC with yogurt was passed (that is, the OFC was negative) by 20/31 (64%) of the children with systemic CMA. 10/11 (91%) of the patients who failed OFC (that is, the OFC was positive) with yogurt were positive to SPT with casein vs. 8/20 (40%) of the patients who passed it (p = 0.018). None of the 19 children who passed OFC with yogurt failed all OFC with processed CM forms other than yogurt that tested vs. 4/8 among those who failed OFC with yogurt (p = 0.006). The rub test with yogurt was negative in 1/3 (33%) of the patients with ICU CMA.ConclusionsThe results of our study are placed alongside others already present in the literature and concerning other methods of processing CM proteins and help to reduce the dietary restrictions of the majority of children with systemic IgE-CMA.     

Baked milk tolerant patient: Is there any special feature?

BackgroundDetermining whether patients with cow's milk allergy (CMA) can tolerate foods produced with baked milk could provide a better quality of life, a better prognosis, and an option for desensitization.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to identify which patients over four years of age with persistent CMA could tolerate baked milk, to compare the clinical and laboratory characteristics of reactive and non-reactive groups and to describe their clinical evolution.Materials and methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted (January/13 to November/14) that included all the patients followed at a food allergy center who met the inclusion criteria. The patients underwent an oral food challenge (OFC) with a muffin (2.8 g of cow's milk protein). To exclude cow's milk (CM) tolerance, the patients were subsequently challenged with unheated CM.ResultsThirty patients met all the inclusion criteria. Fourteen patients (46.7%) were considered non-reactive to baked milk and reactive to unheated CM. When the groups that were reactive and non-reactive to baked milk were compared, no statistically significant differences in clinical features were found. The prick test for α-lactalbumin (p = 0.01) and casein (p = 0.004) and the serum specific IgE for casein (p = 0.05) presented statistical differences. After one year, none of the patients who were reactive to baked milk were ingesting CM, while 28% of the tolerant patients were consuming fresh CM (p = 0.037).ConclusionsBaked milk can be tolerated by patients with CMA, especially those with lower levels of casein and α-lactalbumin. This option can improve quality of life and accelerate tolerance.     

Atopy patch test in children with cow's milk and hen's egg allergy: Do clinical symptoms matter?

Introduction and objectivesSince early 2000s, atopy patch test (APT) has been used to determine non-IgE and mixed-type food allergies. Previous studies have reported conflicting results about the diagnostic value of APT in food allergies, due to non-standardized methods.We aimed to determine the diagnostic efficacy of APT compared to open oral food challenge (OFC) in patients diagnosed with cow's milk allergy (CMA) and hen's egg allergy (HEA) manifesting as atopic dermatitis (AD) and gastrointestinal system symptoms.Materials and methodsIn patients with suspected AD and/or gastrointestinal manifestations due to CMA and HEA, the results of OFC, APT, skin prick test (SPT) and specific IgE (sIgE) were reviewed. Specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of sIgE, SPT, APT and SPT + APT were calculated.ResultsIn total 133 patients with suspected CMA (80) and HEA (53) were included in the study.In patients with CMA presenting with gastrointestinal symptoms, APT had sensitivity of 9.1%, specificity of 100%, PPV of 100% and NPV of 48.7%. In atopic dermatitis patients, sensitivity of APT was 71.4%, specificity 90.6%, PPV 62.5% and NPV 93.6%.In patients diagnosed with HEA, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV values of APT were 72.0%, 78.6%, 47.2% and 75.0%, respectively. In patients diagnosed with HEA presenting with AD, sensitivity of APT was 87.5%, specificity 70.6%, PPV 73.7% and NPV 85.7%. Atopy patch test had lower sensitivity (44.4%) and higher specificity (90.9%) in patients diagnosed with HEA presenting with gastrointestinal symptoms than those presenting with AD.ConclusionOur study showed that APT provided reliable diagnostic accuracy in atopic dermatitis patients. However, APT had low sensitivity in patients with gastrointestinal symptoms.     

Practical interest of both skin prick test and specific IgE in the evaluation of tolerance acquisition in IgE mediated cow's milk allergy (CMA). A clinical retrospective study in a cohort of 184 children

BackgroundCow's milk protein allergy (CMPA) represents one of the leading causes of food allergy in infants and young children. The immune reaction may be IgE mediated, non-IgE mediated, or mixed. IgE-mediated cow's milk protein allergy is revealed by immediate and acute symptoms which can be severe. The aim of this study is to report a one centre experience in the real life of testing children with IgE-mediated CMPA and try to identify predictive factor for follow-up challenges.MethodRetrospective and monocentric study between September 1997 and February 2008. 178 infants diagnosed with IgE-mediated CMPA during breastfeeding weaning were included. Initial factors such as age, sex, skin prick tests (SPTs), specific IgE (sIgE), atopic dermatitis and types of reaction were noted. Between 12 and 24 months all infants have undergone at least one evaluation including SPT.ResultsAt the food challenge, 138 (75.8%) infants were found tolerant. Results of the skin prick test (SPT) were statistically different according to the food challenge result (2.2 mm vs. 5.1 mm, p < 0.0001). It was the same result for sIgE for CM 2.0 ku/l vs. 11.5 ku/l – p < 0.0001 and for casein 1.0 ku/l vs. 16.0 ku/l – p = 0.0014.ConclusionThis study confirms the practical interest of both SPT and sIgE in the evaluation of tolerance induction in IgE-mediated CMPA, but with no corresponding results. Sensitivity, specificity and probability curves of success for cow's milk challenge can be determined and have clinical utility.     

Diagnostic values for egg white specific IgE levels with the skin prick test in Turkish children with egg white allergy

BackgroundThe diagnostic values for the skin prick test (SPT) diameters and egg white-specific IgE (EW-sIgE) levels that will allow us to predict the result of the oral food challenge test (OFC) in the diagnosis of egg white allergy vary by the community where the study is carried out.ObjectiveThis study aimed to determine the diagnostic values of SPT and EW-sIgE levels in the diagnosis of egg white allergy.Methods59 patients followed with the diagnosis of egg allergy September 2013 to September 2015 were included in our retrospective cross-sectional study. The patients were investigated in terms of egg and anaphylaxis history or the requirement of the OFC positivity. The demographic, clinical and laboratory findings of the cases were recorded, and they were compared with the patients with the suspected egg allergy but negative OFC (n = 47).ResultsIn the study, for all age groups, the value of 5 mm in SPT was found to be significant at 96.4% positive predictive value (PPV) and 97.8% specificity and the value of 5.27 kU/L for EW-sIgE was found to be significant at 76% PPV and 86.6% specificity for egg white. The diagnostic power of the SPT for egg white (AUC: 72.2%) was determined to be significantly higher compared to the diagnostic power of the EW-sIgE (AUC: 52.3%) (p < 0.05).ConclusionAlong with the determination of the diagnostic values of communities, the rapid and accurate diagnosis of the children with a food allergy will be ensured, and the patient follow-up will be made easier.     

Nutritional status and food intake of children with cow's milk allergy

Introduction and objectivesCow's milk allergy (CMA) is common, especially in children. The treatment is based on the exclusion of milk and dairy products and guidance regarding the exclusion diet. This study aimed to compare the anthropometric measurements and food intake of children with CMA with those of healthy controls, and to evaluate the serum concentrations of Vitamin A and 25(OH)D in children with CMA.MethodsThis is a cross-sectional study with 27 children in the CMA group and 30 in the control group. z-Scores of body mass index and height, skinfolds, food intake and serum concentrations of retinol, beta-carotene, lycopene, 25(OH)D, parathyroid hormone and high sensitivity C-reactive protein were evaluated.ResultsMean age was four years (±1.9). The CMA group evidenced a lower height compared to those from the control group (p = 0.0043). The CMA group showed a lower intake of calcium (p = 0.0033) and lipids (p = 0.0123). Low serum concentrations of retinol, beta-carotene, lycopene, 25(OH)D were found in 25.9%, 59.3%, 48.1% and 70.3% of the CMA group, respectively.ConclusionsChildren with CMA consume smaller amounts of calcium and lipids and have shorter height compared to healthy controls. Insufficient levels of vitamins A and D were frequent in the CMA group, emphasizing the need for nutritional guidance and monitoring.     

Successful oral desensitization in children with cow's milk anaphylaxis: Clinical and laboratory evaluation up to nine-years follow-up

IntroductionCow's milk protein allergy (CMPA) is the most common food allergy in children worldwide. Some children have severe and persistent CMPA, with near-fatal reactions after exposure to trace amounts of cow's milk-proteins (CMP). Strict avoidance diet is difficult, negatively affects quality of life and represents a conservative approach. Therefore, different therapeutic strategies are necessary.ObjectiveWe aimed to assess long-term efficacy and safety of oral immunotherapy (OIT) in children with severe and long-lasting IgE-mediated CMPA.Materials and methodsThe authors present four case reports of patients with CMPA who underwent CMP-OIT, that have been under long-term follow-up up to nine years. We provide information about the clinical and laboratory evaluation. Skin prick tests (SPT), specific IgE and IgG4 were performed before, during, and after OIT. Immune profile after OIT was assessed by flow cytometry (lymphocyte subsets, regulatory T and B cells).ResultsThe success rate was 100%, and all patients currently have a free diet with minimal diary ingestion of 200 mL CMP or equivalent. Specific IgE levels and SPT to CMP have progressively decreased, and specific IgG4 levels have increased. CD4⁺CD25⁺CD127^−/dim regulatory T cells were increased after OIT.ConclusionsOIT ensured a clinical tolerance state after up to nine years, confirmed by both clinical and immune profile, allowing a diet without restrictions, with high satisfaction from patients and caregivers. We emphasize that OIT should be performed only by allergy experts in the hospital setting, and that only motivated families should be enrolled, since it is essential to ensure CMP daily intake at home.     

Is oral food challenge test useful for avoiding complete elimination of cow's milk in Japanese patients with or suspected of having IgE-dependent cow's milk allergy?

BackgroundCow's milk, along with hen's egg, are common causes of food allergies in children worldwide. Accidental ingestion of milk is common and often induces severe allergic reactions. Oral food challenge test (OFC) is usually performed in patients with or suspected of having a food allergy. However, the evidence of whether cow's milk OFC is useful in IgE-dependent cow's milk allergy patients to avoid total elimination is not known.MethodsAfter setting the clinical question and outcomes, we performed a systematic review for relevant articles published from January 1, 2000 to August 31, 2019 using PubMed® and Ichushi-Web databases. Each article was then evaluated for the level of evidence. All positive results of the OFC were defined as adverse events.ResultsForty articles were selected in this study. Our review revealed that cow's milk OFC was able to avoid the complete elimination of cow's milk in 66% of the patients with cow's milk allergy. We also found that adverse events occurred frequently (50.5%).ConclusionsThis analysis supports the recommendation of conducting cow's milk OFC to avoid complete elimination of cow's milk, however the test should be conducted with careful consideration of the patient's safety. As the methods of OFC and subjects varied among the articles selected in this study, further studies are needed to obtain higher quality evidence.     

In vitro methods for specific IgE detection in cow's milk allergy

BackgroundA new method for determining serum specific IgE (IMMULITE^® 2000 3gAllergy) has recently become available.ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical performance of IMMULITE 2000 in the diagnosis of cow's milk allergy compared with that of UniCAP^®. Additionally, we verified the behavior of both methods at two diagnostic decision points proposed by other authors.MethodsThe study population consisted of 31 children with cow's milk allergy (group A) and a control group of 19 atopic children without food allergy (group B). A blood sample from each child was tested using both methods and the results were compared.ResultsIn group A, the values for cow's milk IgE ranged from 0.35 kU/L (the lowest common detection limit) to above 100 kU/L. In group B, the values were less than 1.1 kU/L for IMMULITE 2000 and less than 1.6 kU/L for UniCAP. An agreement of 90 % in IgE classes was obtained. Both methods demonstrated exactly the same diagnostic performance (sensitivity: 100 %; specificity: 78.9 %; negative predictive value: 100 %; positive predictive value: 84.6%; efficiency: 90.2 %). The evaluation of the two methods at the two different decision points proposed in the literature showed a better positive predictive value with UniCAP, but we obtained equivalent performance with IMMULITE 2000 by choosing higher cutoff values.ConclusionsWe conclude that IMMULITE 2000 is as effective as UniCAP in the diagnosis of cow's milk allergy. Both methods can be used to obtain site-specific decision points that are population, age and disease dependent.     

Double-blind,placebo-controlled food challenges in Brazilian children: Adaptation to clinical practice

BackgroundA double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) is considered the gold standard for diagnosing food allergy, but because of methodological difficulties it is rarely conducted in clinical practice, especially in paediatric patients. The purpose of the study was to propose a DBPCFC protocol that is adapted to our conditions for the diagnosis of an IgE-mediated cow's milk allergy (CMA) in a Brazilian reference centre for paediatric allergies.MethodsThis study includes the experimental phase (choice of materials, adjustments made to protocols described in the literature) and the test execution phase. DBPCFCs were performed in 58 patients aged 1–15 years who were separated into two groups: Group 1 (n = 39), sex 1.6 M:F, 5.3 years median age, suggestive history of IgE-mediated CMA; and Group 2 (n = 19), sex 1.4 M:F, 8.3 years median age with symptoms not associated with milk ingestion and laboratory data not compatible with IgE-mediated CMA.ResultsThe materials were standardised for testing: containers and disposable products, low-lactose cow's milk (CM) and vehicles, such as natural fruit juice, vegetable soup and soybean-based beverages. Each DBPCFC was performed in a single day with two blind, randomised phases with a 2-h interval between them. The milk doses were gradually increased and offered in regular intervals of 15–30 min. Following negative or inconclusive results, patients underwent an open oral challenge test with 200 mL of low-lactose CM.ConclusionsThe proposed adaptation for the DBPCFC allowed to implement this important test for the diagnosis of IgE-mediated CMA in a reference centre for paediatric allergies. It was considered feasible and safe if performed in an appropriate setting with physician supervision.     

Allergy to goat and sheep cheese with tolerance to cow's milk and its derivatives

ObjectiveWe present two adult and three paediatric patients who had allergic reactions after cheese ingestion and subsequently tolerated cow's milk derivatives. The objective of this study was to determine possible cross-reactivity between different types of cheese.MethodsSkin tests were performed to cow's milk fractions, and prick–prick tests for goat, sheep and cow cheese. Specific IgE to the fractions of cow's milk and cow, sheep and goat cheese was analysed. The protein profile of cow, sheep and goat cheese extracts was determined by SDS-PAGE and the allergenic profile by immunoblot. Cross-reactivity was investigated by immunoblot inhibition.ResultsSkin tests were positive for casein in the patients. The prick–prick tests were positive for the three cheeses in patients 1 and 4, for goat and sheep cheese in patients 2 and 3, and for sheep cheese in patient 5. The specific IgE test was positive in patients 1, 3 and 4 for goat and sheep cheese, and negative in patients 2 and 5. Serum 3 and 4 clearly recognised goat and sheep cheese extracts. Goat casein was almost completely inhibited with sheep casein and partially inhibited with goat and sheep serum proteins, while there was no inhibition with cow cheese. Sheep casein was totally inhibited with sheep serum proteins. Sheep casein was inhibited with goat and cow caseins, suggesting cross-reactivity among the three types of cheese.ConclusionsWe showed sensitisation to goat and sheep cheese in two patients, and only to sheep cheese in another two of the studied patients.     

Tolerance to baked and fermented cow's milk in children with IgE-mediated and non-IgE-mediated cow's milk allergy in patients under two years of age

BackgroundIgE-mediated cow's milk allergy (CMA) has been shown consistent in milder heated-milk tolerant and severe heated-milk reactant groups in patients older than two years. Little is known whether fermentation of milk gives rise to similar clinical phenotypes.We aimed to determine the influence of extensively heated and fermented cow's milk on the IgE-mediated and non-IgE-mediated CMA in children younger than two years.MethodsSubjects followed with the diagnosis of IgE-mediated and non-IgE-mediated CMA for at least six months underwent unheated milk challenge. IgE-mediated and non-IgE-mediated groups were categorised as unheated milk-reactive and tolerant, separately. Unheated milk-reactive groups were further challenged sequentially with fermented milk (yoghurt) and baked milk, 15 days apart. Allergy evaluation with skin tests, prick-to-prick tests and atopy patch tests were performed.ResultsFifty-seven children (median age: 14 months; range: 7–24 months) underwent unheated milk challenge. Eleven of 27 children with IgE-mediated CMA and 14 of 30 children with non-IgE-mediated CMA tolerated unheated milk. Among subjects who reacted to unheated milk; 15 of 16 subjects (93%) with IgE-mediated CMA also reacted to yoghurt, whereas 11 of 16 subjects (68%) with non-IgE-mediated CMA tolerated fermented milk. Thirteen subjects (81%) of the unheated milk-reactive IgE-mediated group tolerated to heated milk. None of 16 subjects of unheated milk-reactive non-IgE-mediated group reacted to baked milk.ConclusionThe majority of children under the age of two years with both IgE-mediated and non-IgE-mediated CMA tolerated baked-milk products. Yoghurt was tolerated in two thirds of unheated milk reactive patients suffering from non-IgE-mediated CMA.     

Effect of oral immunotherapy in children with milk allergy: The ORIMA study

BackgroundThis study was aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of oral immunotherapy (OIT) in children with severe cow's milk allergy.MethodsThe subjects comprised 28 children (aged 3–12 years) with allergic symptoms that were induced by ≤ 10 mL of cow's milk in an oral food challenge test (OFC). The subjects were randomly allocated to the treatment group (n = 14) and control group (n = 14); the former received rush immunotherapy for 2 weeks, followed by a gradual increase of cow's milk volume to 100 mL for 1 year, and the latter completely eliminated cow's milk for 1 year. Both groups underwent an OFC with 100 mL of cow's milk after 1 year.ResultsThe treatment group had significantly higher rates of a negative OFC [7/14 (50%) vs. 0/14 (0%), p < 0.01] compared with the control group. The cow's milk-specific IgE level significantly decreased in the treatment group (p < 0.01) but not in the control group (p = 0.63). During the study period, adrenaline was required in 6/14 patients (43%) of the treatment group and in 0/14 patients (0%) of the control group. Long follow-up data were available at the 2-year point after the study for 8 in the treatment group and 7 (87.5%) of these continued to ingest milk (>100 mL).ConclusionsThe effect of immunotherapy was 50%, but the incidence of adverse events was not low. Further studies focusing on safety is necessary to standardize OIT for cow's milk allergy.     

Goat's milk allergy

BackgroundGoat's milk (GM) allergy not associated with allergy to cow's milk (CM) is a rare disorder. Caseins have been implicated has the major allergens eliciting symptoms.MethodsWe report the case of a 27 years-old female patient that experienced two episodes of urticaria related to ingestion of goat's cheese (GC). She tolerated CM, dairy products and sheep cheese. Skin prick tests were performed with GM, CM, bovine casein and α-lactalbumin and fresh milk and GC. Serum specific IgE to GM, CM and its fractions, and GM and CM immunobloting assays with inhibition were also evaluated.ResultsSkin tests were positive to GM and GC and negative to CM. GM immunoblot showed an IgE-binding 14 kDa band that was totally inhibited after serum pre-incubation with GM.ConclusionsAllergens other than casein can be involved in allergy to GM. Even small quantities of protein can elicit symptoms.     

Association between skin prick test and serum specific immunoglobulin E to American cockroach allergens in allergic rhinitis patients

Introduction and objectivesAmerican cockroach is a common aeroallergen sensitization in allergic rhinitis (AR) patients. Association between skin prick test (SPT) and specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) to American cockroach allergen remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the association between SPT and sIgE to American cockroach allergen in patients with AR.Materials and methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted in Thai AR patients aged 6–25 years from September 2013 to October 2014. SPT and sIgE to American cockroach allergen were performed and the correlation was calculated using SPSS Statistics version 18.ResultsSixty-seven AR patients, with median age of 15 years were included in this study. SPT and sIgE to American cockroach allergen showed a positive result in 68.7% and 58.2% cases, respectively. Positive SPT or positive sIgE to American cockroach was found in 79.1%. Thirty-two patients (47.8%) tested positive for both SPT and sIgE to American cockroach allergen. Fourteen from a total of 67 cases (20.9%) with negative sIgE had positive SPT to American cockroach, while seven cases (10.4%) with negative SPT had positive sIgE to American cockroach. Moderate correlation was observed between mean wheal diameter (MWD) and sIgE level to American cockroach (r = 0.465, p = 0.001). No significant correlation was found between MWD of SPT or sIgE level to American cockroach and AR severity.ConclusionA moderate correlation was observed between MWD of SPT and sIgE level to American cockroach. If SPT is negative in allergic rhinitis patients highly suspected of having American cockroach allergy, serum sIgE should be considered and vice versa.     

Risk of adverse IgE-mediate reaction at the first egg ingestion in children with atopic dermatitis. Results of a case-control study

BackgroundStudies have reported that children with atopic dermatitis (AD) have a high risk of adverse reactions at first egg ingestion.MethodsWe enrolled 79 children with AD retrospectively and 45 children without AD (control group) prospectively, who had never eaten egg. All children underwent skin prick tests (SPT) with commercial extracts and prick by prick with natural food (raw and boiled egg). Oral food challenge (OFC) was performed in SPT positive patients.ResultsSixty-six percent (52/79) of AD group and 11% (5/45) of Control group had at least one positive SPT (p < 0.001), Relative Risk (RR) = 5.9 and Odds Ratio = 15.4. Of the 46/52 sensitised children in the AD group, 36 children ate egg for the first time in hospital during an OFC and 10 children ate egg at home because of their parents’ choice, with 19/46 (41%) resulting in allergic reactions to raw and/or boiled egg. Four/five sensitised children in the control group underwent OFC and three of them (75%) showed an allergic reaction to raw, but not boiled egg. Thirty percent (14/46) of AD group had a systemic reaction vs. 25% (1/4) of Control group.ConclusionA child with AD has a RR of sensitisation to egg six times higher than a child without AD, before the first known ingestion. We propose to test sensitisation to egg in every child with AD who has never eaten egg, and to perform OFC in those with positive SPT in hospital setting.     

Prophylactic probiotics reduce cow's milk protein intolerance in neonates after small intestine surgery and antibiotic treatment presenting symptoms that mimics postoperative infection

BackgroundTo examine occurrence of cow's milk protein intolerance (CMPI) in newborns that underwent small intestine surgery and the clinical profiles of those newborns with postoperative CMPI, and to evaluate the preventive effects of probiotics on CMPI.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed from 2000 to 2009, a total of 30 newborns required surgery on their small intestines. All of these patients had received antibiotics to prevent postoperative infection. Since 2005 we adopted a protocol of targeted probiotic therapy prophylaxis.ResultsEighteen patients received probiotic therapy, while twelve did not. One infant among those eighteen patients and eight patients among those twelve developed CMPI, a significantly lower rate for the group with probiotic therapy than that without it (p < 0.001). Patients with positive cultures for gram positive and gram negative organisms increased in number before and after surgery but then decreased after probiotics treatment. Poor weight gain, gastrointestinal symptoms, and rise in C reactive protein (CRP) levels were observed in all of those nine CMPI patients. Specific IgE antibodies were elevated in four of the nine subjects, and total IgE levels were elevated in seven of them. All CMPI patients had increased level of CRP without proven infections.ConclusionsCMPI was induced in newborns after surgery on their small intestines and antibiotics treatment with presentation of symptoms that mimic postoperative infection. Development of CMPI in this population possibly involves disruption of intestinal flora. Administration of probiotics can reduce the incidence of CMPI after small intestine surgery. The elevated CRP level may be useful in the diagnosis of CMPI.     

Minimal agreement between basophil activation test and immunoassay in diagnosis of penicillin allergy

IntroductionBasophil activation test (BAT) and immunoassays are the most widely used in vitro tests to diagnose IgE-mediated allergic reactions to penicillin. However, studies to determine if one test is interdependent from another are limited.ObjectiveThe present study aimed to measure the agreement between BAT and immunoassay in diagnosis of penicillin allergy.MethodBAT was performed using penicillin G (Pen G), penicillin V (Pen V), penicilloyl-polylysine (PPL), minor determinant mix (MDM), amoxicillin (Amx) and ampicillin (Amp) in 25 patients. Immunoassay of total IgE (tIgE) and specific IgE (sIgE) antibodies to Pen G, Pen V, Amx and Amp were quantified. Skin prick test (SPT) using PPL-MDM, Amx, Amp and Clavulanic acid were also performed.ResultsMinimal agreement was observed between BAT and immunoassay (k = 0.25). Of two BAT-positive patients, one patient is positive to Amx (59.27%, SI = 59) and Amp (82.32%, SI = 82) but sIgE-negative to all drug tested. This patient is also SPT-positive to both drugs. Another patient is BAT-positive to Pen G (10.18%, SI = 40), Pen V (25.07%, SI = 100) and Amp (19.52%, SI = 79). In sIgE immunoassay, four patients were sIgE-positive to at least one of the drugs tested. The sIgE level of three patients was between low and moderate and they were BAT-negative. One BAT-positive patient had a high level of sIgE antibodies (3.50–17.5 kU/L) along with relatively high specific to total IgE ratio ≥0.002 (0.004–0.007).ConclusionsThe agreement between BAT and immunoassay is minimal. Performing both tests provides little increase in the sensitivity of allergy diagnosis work-up for immediate reactions to penicillin.     

Low efficacy of atopy patch test in predicting tolerance development in non-IgE-mediated cow's milk allergy

Background

The food atopy patch (APT) test has been used in previous studies to help the diagnosis of non-IgE mediated food allergies (FA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of different cow's milk APT preparations to predict oral tolerance in children with previous non-IgE-mediated cow's milk allergy (CMA) diagnosis.