Mechanical valve replacement in children and teenagers

A previous study from this unit showed that only 19% of children with mitral bioprostheses were free from complications after 7 years and prompted us to review the performance of new-generation mechanical prostheses implanted in the same population group. In a 5-year period (1980-1985), 352 patients 20 years old and younger (mean age 15.3 +/- 4 years) with rheumatic valvular disease had 177 mitral, 62 aortic and 113 double (mitral + aortic) valve replacements with Medtronic-Hall or St. Jude prostheses. The overall early mortality was 6.3%. All survivors, followed up for a total of 1171 patient-years, received oral anticoagulation. The late mortality for mitral, aortic and double valve replacement was 4.1% per patient-year, 4.3% per patient-year and 8.0% per patient-year, respectively (P less than 0.05), and was valve-related in 46% of the cases. Twenty-nine patients, all but 2 in the mitral and double valve replacement groups, were reoperated upon (2.5% per patient-year), mainly for infective endocarditis (34%), for prosthetic thrombosis (33%) and for bland periprosthetic leak (31%). The incidence of thrombotic obstruction was 1.1% per patient-year: mitral valve replacement, 1.0% per patient-year; aortic valve replacement 0.5% per patient-year; and double valve replacement, 1.7% per patient-year; P less than 0.05) and was fatal in 33% of the cases. Major systemic thromboembolism occurred at the rate of 1.4% per patient-year, similar in the three groups. The incidence of prosthetic endocarditis was 0.9% per patient-year.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Twenty-year comparison of tissue and mechanical valve replacement

OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare outcomes with tissue and St Jude Medical mechanical valves over a 20-year period. METHODS: Valve-related events and overall survival were analyzed in 2533 patients 18 years of age or older undergoing initial aortic, mitral, or combined aortic and mitral (double) valve replacement with a tissue valve (Hancock, Carpentier-Edwards porcine, or Carpentier-Edwards pericardial) or a St Jude Medical mechanical valve. Total follow-up was 13,390 patient-years. There were 666 St Jude Medical aortic valve replacements, 723 tissue aortic valve replacements, 513 St Jude Medical mitral valve replacements, 402 tissue mitral valve replacements, 161 St Jude Medical double valve replacements, and 68 tissue double valve replacements. The mean age was 68 +/- 13.3 years (St Jude Medical valve, 64.5 +/- 12.9; tissue valve, 72.0 +/- 12.6). RESULTS: There were no overall differences in survival between tissue and mechanical valves. Multivariable analysis indicated that the type of valve did not affect survival. Analysis by age less than 65 years or 65 years or older and presence or absence of coronary disease revealed similar long-term survival in all subgroups. The risk of hemorrhage was lower in patients receiving tissue aortic valve replacements but was not significantly different in patients receiving mitral valve or double valve replacements. Thromboembolism rates were similar for tissue and mechanical valve recipients. However, reoperation rates were significantly higher in patients receiving both aortic and mitral tissue valves. The reoperation hazard increased progressively with time both in patients receiving aortic and in those receiving mitral tissue valves. Overall valve complications were initially higher with mechanical aortic valves but not with mechanical mitral valves. However, valve complication rates later crossed over, with higher rates in tissue valve recipients after 7 years in patients undergoing mitral valve replacement and 10 years in those undergoing aortic valve replacement. CONCLUSIONS: Tissue and mechanical valve recipients have similar survival over 20 years of follow-up. The primary tradeoff is an increased risk of hemorrhage in patients receiving mechanical aortic valve replacements and an increased risk of late reoperation in all patients receiving tissue valve replacements. The risk of tissue valve reoperation increases progressively with time.     

Ten-year follow-up after valve replacement with the St. Jude Medical prosthesis in children

Since 1979, 50 children, 4 months to 15 years of age, have successfully undergone cardiac valve replacement with the St. Jude Medical prosthesis (St. Jude Medical, Inc., St. Paul, Minn.). There were 24 boys and 26 girls. The valve replaced was mitral in 28 children, aortic in 15, mitral and aortic in 1, and mitral and tricuspid in 1. A left-sided tricuspid valve was replaced in 3 children. Anticoagulant therapy was maintained in all children; 40 children were treated with warfarin, whereas 10 children who underwent aortic or mitral valve replacement were on a regimen of aspirin combined with dipyridamole. The follow-up period, comprising 224 patient-years, ranged from 1 to 10 years. There were four valve-related complications: one from thromboembolism, two from valve thrombosis, and the other one from prosthetic valve endocarditis. Actuarial rate free from all valve-related complications at 10 years was 84.7%. There were four late deaths: one from valve thrombosis and the others from non-valve-related complications. Actuarial survival rate at 10 years was 90.8%. All surviving children are in functional class I, and no child so far has needed replacement of a prosthesis because of somatic growth. These results indicate that the St. Jude Medical prosthesis is a cardiac valve substitute of choice for valve replacement in children.     

Valve replacement in the elderly. Is the mechanical valve a good alternative?

The controversy surrounding the choice of a prosthesis for valve replacement in the elderly patient prompted me to review the performance of mechanical (Medtronic Hall [Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, Minn.] and St. Jude Medical [St. Jude Medical, Inc., St. Paul, Minn.]) valves implanted in 213 patients 65 years and older (mean 70.4 years) from 1980 to 1985. There were 63 mitral, 131 aortic, and 19 double (aortic and mitral) valve replacements. Most patients undergoing aortic valve replacement had stenotic lesions, but half of the patients in the mitral valve replacement group had regurgitation with or without stenosis. Early mortality rates for mitral, aortic, and double valve replacement were 4.8%, 6.1%, and 21.1%, respectively (p less than 0.01). The mortality rate for patients 65 to 74 years old was 6.5% and that for those older than 75 years was 9.1%. The cumulative follow-up for the survivors was 850 patient-years. The late mortality rate was 8.1% per patient-year but was valve-related in only 1.3% per patient-year. Noncardiac causes accounted for 43.5% of the late deaths. The late mortality rate was significantly higher in patients who had regurgitant lesions than in those who had stenotic or mixed disease. It was also higher in the older patients (10.3% per patient-year) than in the younger group (7.6% per patient-year; p less than 0.05). Reoperation was required in only six patients (0.7% per patient-year). Thrombotic obstruction of the prosthesis and systemic thromboembolism occurred at linearized rates of 0.6% per patient-year and 2.5% per patient year, respectively, and significant anticoagulant-related hemorrhage at a rate of 0.6% per patient-year. With the exception of late mortality, the incidence of all late complications was similar to that of patients younger than 65 years operated on during the same period. Actuarially, global survival (58% +/- 4%) and freedom from reoperation (95% +/- 2%), from thrombotic obstruction (96% +/- 1%), from thromboembolism (92% +/- 2%), from all valve-related mortality and morbidity (82% +/- 3%), and from valve failure (93% +/- 2%) were also similar to those of the younger patients. Mechanical prostheses perform well in elderly patients. I could not confirm an increase in thromboembolic or hemorrhagic episodes, and the respective mortality and morbidity indexes were similar to those observed in younger patients.     

In vivo hemodynamics of prosthetic St. Jude Medical and Ionescu-Shiley heart valves analyzed by computer

Using a method of our own design, we evaluated intraoperatively the function of prosthetic heart valves. The changing hemodynamics induced by a stress test were assessed by simultaneously measuring the mean transvalvular pressure gradient and the stroke volume. The effective orifice area (EOA) of the valves was determined for each stroke by computer analysis, and this value was compared with the actual orifice area. Data were collected from 19 patients undergoing aortic or mitral valve replacement or both with 17 St. Jude Medical and 12 Ionescu-Shiley valves. The mean pressure gradient increased with tachycardia and an increase in mean left atrial pressure in the mitral position, but decreased with a decrease in cardiac output and peak left ventricular pressure in the aortic position. The St. Jude Medical valve had a smaller mean pressure gradient than the Ionescu-Shiley bioprosthesis. For both valves, the EOA increased with valve size. The St. Jude Medical valve had a greater EOA than the Ionescu-Shiley bioprosthesis, regardless of the valve size (p less than 0.005). However, the performance of prosthetic leaflets was better with the Ionescu-Shiley bioprosthesis than with the St. Jude Medical mechanical valve (p less than 0.001). This method involving computer analysis of each cardiac cycle proved to be useful for evaluating prosthetic heart valve function in the presence of changing hemodynamics.     

St. Jude Medical prosthetic aortic valve malfunction due to pannus formation.

According to the literature, the incidence of pannus formation with the St. Jude Medical prosthetic aortic valve has been reported at 0.03% and 0.14% (per patient-year), with no case report of St. Jude Medical prosthetic aortic valve malfunction due to pannus formation. Between 1980 and 1999, 1,186 patients underwent aortic valve replacement at our institute. We encountered 2 aortic valve malfunctions due to pannus formation, including the case of a 53-year-old woman who suffered a St. Jude medical aortic valve malfunction 13 years after the initial operation. A second aortic valve replacement was successful and the postoperative course was uneventful. The possibility of pannus formation on St. Jude Medical aortic valves must thus be considered and its mechanism clarified.     

St. Jude Medical valve replacement: clinical experience with 1,039 patients

St. Jude Medical valve replacement was performed in 1,039 patients; 320 had aortic (AVR), 543 mitral (MVR), and 176 had double valve replacement (DVR). There were 44(4.2%) early deaths. Follow-up extended in 995 patients from 10 to 130 months, with a cumulative period of 2,730 patients-years. The overall survival rates of AVR, MVR, and DVR patients at 10 years were 60.5%, 89.6%, 90.3% respectively. The linearized incidences of valve thrombosis, thromboembolism, anticoagulation-related hemorrhage, prosthetic valve endocarditis, and significant hemolysis were as follows: 0.11%/pt-yr, 1.33%/pt-yr, 0.04%/pt-yr, 0.18%/pt-yr, and 0.11%/pt-yr, respectively. There were no structural failure after 10 years follow-up. Reoperation (explant and re-replacement or suture repair) was required in 10 patients. Seven of them had periprosthetic leakage, 2 had valve thrombosis, and one underwent reoperation because of a technical error. Actuarially over 98% of patients were free of valve-related mortality at 10 years. St. Jude Medical valve is an excellent alternative for use in the surgical treatment of valvular heart disease.     

Mitral and mitro-aortic valve replacement with Sorin Bicarbon valves compared with St. Jude Medical valves

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the clinical results of two bileaflet mechanical valves: the St. Jude Medical (SJM) and the Sorin Bicarbon (Sorin Bicarbon) used either in single mitral valve replacement (MVR) or in double, aortic and mitral, valve replacement (DVR). METHODS: Between September 1990 and November 1995, 217 patients received either a St. Jude Medical (n=134) or a Sorin Bicarbon (n=86): 136 mitral valve replacement with 83 St. Jude Medical and 53 Sorin Bicarbon and 84 double valve replacement with 51 St. Jude Medical and 33 Sorin Bicarbon. There was no difference between both St. Jude Medical and Sorin Bicarbon cohorts in respect of mitral valve physiopathology, etiology of valve disease, associated lesions, echocardiographic and hemodynamic data. The only significant preoperative difference was the age of patients within the double valve replacement group and the size of implanted valves within the mitral valve replacement group. Follow-up was 100% complete with a mean of 39+/-18 months, ranging between 6 and 68 months. The total follow-up was 657 patient-years (pt-y): 396 pt-y in the mitral valve replacement group and 274 pt-y in the double valve replacement group. RESULTS: Hospital mortality (St. Jude Medical: 2.2%; Sorin Bicarbon: 6.9%) and late mortality (St. Jude Medical: 8.4%; Sorin Bicarbon: 6.3%) were not significantly different. Ten deaths were considered valve-related (St. Jude Medical 6, Sorin Bicarbon 4). The estimated 4-yr overall survival, including hospital mortality, was for St. Jude Medical--mitral valve replacement: 89+/-4% and St. Jude Medical--double valve replacement: 93+/-4%, and for Sorin Bicarbon--mitral valve replacement: 87+/-5% and Sorin Bicarbon--double valve replacement: 91+/-5%. The linearized incidence (% per pt-y) of valve-related complications was 6.39 in the St. Jude Medical cohort and 9.2 in the Sorin Bicarbon cohort. The linearized incidence (% pt-y) of the prevalent complication, valve thromboembolism and bleeding, was for St. Jude Medical-mitral valve replacement: 3.41, St. Jude Medical--double valve replacement: 3.16 and for Sorin Bicarbon--mitral valve replacement: 2.17 and Sorin Bicarbon--double valve replacement: 3.67. The differences between each group of an estimated 4-yr freedom from combined thromboembolism and bleeding were not significant (St. Jude Medical--mitral valve replacement: 90+/-4%, St. Jude Medical--double valve replacement: 84+/-6%, and for Sorin Bicarbon--mitral valve replacement: 94+/-3% and Sorin Bicarbon--double valve replacement: 75+/-17%). CONCLUSIONS: In this clinical non-randomized study, there was no evidence of any significant difference between St. Jude Medical and Sorin Bicarbon valves over a 4-yr follow-up.     

Five-year clinical evalution of the St. Jude medical valve prosthesis in 136 patients

One hundred and thirty-six patients (June 1979, through May 1984) underwent mitral, aortic or double valve replacement and apico-aortic bypass with the St. Jude Medical (SJM) prosthesis, at Ryukyu University Hospital, Okinawa. Operative mortality for the entire group was 4.4 per cent. Late mortality from 1979–1984 was 6.1 per cent. There were no deaths related to mechanical failure. Warfarin anticoagulation was recommended for all patients. The incidence of thromboembolism was 0.76/100 patient years. Post operative catheterization studies in 21 patients one year after operation showed a satisfactory recovery of cardiac function. The SJM valve seems to be the satisfactory artificial valve in present use.     

The choice of anticoagulation in pediatric patients with the St. Jude Medical valve prostheses

Between February 1982 and January 1984 27 St. Jude Medical cardiac valve prostheses were implanted in 24 children ranging in age from 5 to 20 years (mean 12.38 years). There were 10 isolated aortic valve replacements, 14 isolated mitral valve replacements and one triple valve replacement (aortic, mitral and tricuspid). There was one operative and four late deaths. All patients were maintained on Aspirin and Dipyridamole from the early postoperative period. There were six documented thromboembolic events occurring in five patients. There were 0.68 thromboembolic events per patient year in the aortic valve group and 0.19 events in the mitral valve group. Because of the significant incidence of thromboembolic events in our patients, we now recommend universal anticoagulation with Coumadin in all pediatric age patients in whom the St. Jude Medical prosthesis is implanted.     

Twenty-year experience with the St Jude Medical mechanical valve prosthesis

BACKGROUND: We have prospectively followed all adult St Jude Medical mechanical valve recipients at the Medical University of South Carolina since the initial implant in January 1979 and now present our 20-year experience. METHODS: We prospectively followed 837 valve recipients (aortic valve replacement; n = 478; mitral valve replacement; n = 359) from January 1979 to December 2000 at 12-month intervals. RESULTS: Ages ranged from 19 to 84 years. Follow-up averaged (mean +/- standard deviation) 7 +/- 5 years (98% complete). Patients were in New York Heart Association class III or IV in 77% (aortic valve replacement) and 89% (mitral valve replacement) preoperatively. A 19-mm valve was implanted in 15.5% of aortic valve replacement patients. Coronary bypass was required in 31% of aortic valve replacements and 20% of mitral valve replacements. Operative mortality was 17/478 (3.6%) in aortic valve replacement and 19/359 (5.3%) in mitral valve replacement, and multivariable predictors were 19-mm valve size, 3 or more coronary bypass grafts, and New York Heart Association class IV for aortic valve replacement and New York Heart Association class IV and age for mitral valve replacement. Actuarial survivorship at 10 and 20 years was 57% +/- 3% and 26% +/- 5% for aortic valve replacement and 61% +/- 3% and 39% +/- 4% for mitral valve replacement. Multivariable predictors of late death were African-American ethnicity, New York Heart Association class III or IV, coronary bypass, and age for aortic valve replacement and New York Heart Association class III or IV, coronary bypass, and age for mitral valve replacement. For aortic valve replacement, effective orifice area was univariately (P =.002) but not multivariately (P =.378) predictive of late death. Structural valve deterioration was not observed. For aortic valve replacement, actuarial freedom (at 10 and 20 years) from reoperation was 93% +/- 1% and 90% +/- 2%; thromboembolism, 82% +/- 3% and 68% +/- 8%; bleeding events, 77% +/- 3% and 66% +/- 6%; prosthetic valve endocarditis, 94% +/- 1% and 94% +/- 1%; valve-related mortality, 94% +/- 2% and 86% +/- 4%; and valve-related mortality or morbidity, 58% +/- 3% and 32% +/- 8%. For mitral valve replacement, actuarial freedom (at 10 and 20 years) from reoperation was 96% +/- 1% and 90% +/- 3%; thromboembolism, 77% +/- 3% and 59% +/- 7%; bleeding events, 86% +/- 2% and 65% +/- 8%; prosthetic valve endocarditis, 98% +/- 1% and 96% +/- 2%; valve-related mortality, 89% +/- 0.2% and 74% +/- 8%; and valve-related mortality or morbidity, 63% +/- 3% and 29% +/- 7%. CONCLUSIONS: After 2 decades of observation with close follow-up, the St Jude Medical mechanical valve continues to be a reliable prosthesis.     

Thromboembolism in patients with pericardial valves in the absence of chronic anticoagulation: 12 years' experience.

Between January 1977 and January 1989, 465 pericardial bioprostheses were implanted in 424 patients. The mean age of patients was 59.1 years (range 16-81 y.) At the time of surgery, 68% of the patients suffered from chronic atrial fibrillation. Mitral valve replacement was performed in 167 patients, aortic valve replacement in 216, multiple replacement in 40 (36 mitral and aortic, 3 mitral and tricuspid, and 1 mitral, aortic and tricuspid), and 1 pulmonary valve replacement. The different types of pericardial valve used were: Ionescu-Shiley 408, Mitral Medical 23, Bioflo 30, and Hancock 4. Hospital mortality was 10.1% with an attrition rate of 1.8 episodes per 100 patients/year. The 12-year actuarial survival rate was 65.1%. No patient underwent long-term anticoagulant treatment. The first 144 patients undergoing mitral and multiple valve replacements received temporary anticoagulation for the first 8 weeks after surgery. There was no valve thrombosis observed. Altogether 19 thromboembolic events (6 early and 13 late) were clinically documented. One patient died after an embolic event. The linearized rates of thromboembolism were 1.64 episodes per 100 patients/year for mitral and multiple valve replacements and 0.33 episodes per 100 patients/year for aortic valve replacement, with an overall rate of 1.0 episodes per 100 patients/year. Excluding early thromboembolism, the linearized rate was 1.02 episodes per 100 patients/year overall. The actuarial freedom from embolism was 92.4% overall, 88.2% for the mitral and multiple valve replacement group, and 97.6% for the aortic valve replacement group at a maximum follow-up of 12 years.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Clinical performance of St. Jude and Medtronic-Hall prostheses: a randomized comparative study

Newer and improved models of mechanical prostheses are regularly added to surgeons' armamentarium. This study was designed to compare the clinical performance of two of the most used current models of mechanical prostheses. From August 1983 through July 1985, 182 white patients were prospectively randomized to implantation of the St. Jude Medical (95 patients) or Medtronic-Hall (87 patients) prostheses. There were 84 mitral, 85 aortic, and 13 double (mitral and aortic) valve replacements. There were no differences between the two groups with regard to sex distribution, age, functional class, emergency operation, and site of implantation. Early mortality was 3.2% for patients with the St. Jude valve and 5.7% for those with the Medtronic-Hall (p = NS). The survivors were followed for 3 to 5 years (mean, 4.2 +/- 0.6 years; cumulative follow-up, 559 patient-years). Late mortality was 7.1%/patient-year for the St. Jude group and 3.2%/patient-year for the Medtronic-Hall group (p less than 0.05). However, the valve-related mortality was equal (1.4%/patient-year) for both groups. Noncardiac causes accounted for most of the difference between the St. Jude and Medtronic-Hall groups (2.5%/patient-year and 0.4%/patient-year, respectively). There were no cases of thrombotic obstruction, whereas serious systemic thromboembolism occurred at the rate of 1.8%/patient-year (5 episodes) for the St. Jude group and 2.5%/patient-year (7 episodes) for the Medtronic-Hall group (p = not significant); there were another nine episodes of systemic embolism that left no sequelae. Three patients (St. Jude, 2; Medtronic-Hall, 1), all of whom had aortic valve replacement, required reoperation (0.5%/patient-year) because of prosthetic endocarditis, with two deaths.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Long-term follow-up of St. Jude Medical valve

St. Jude Medical bileaflet valve replacement was performed on 182 patients--aortic in 90, mitral in 70, both sites in 20 and tricuspid in two. The 30-day mortality was 4.3%, and was related to poor preoperative condition (NYHA class III or IV). The late mortality during observation up to 8 years was 9.3%, with actuarial survival 87.4% at 5 years and 86.3% at 8 years. For aortic, mitral and double valve replacement the respective 8-year figures were 88, 87.3 and 76.2%. Late death was associated with high preoperative pulmonary vascular resistance in five cases, dysrhythmia in four, myocardial infarction in two, thromboembolism, paravalvular leakage, prosthetic endocarditis or bleeding, each in one case, and was accidental in two cases. Calculated per 100 patient years the incidence of late thromboembolic events was 1.0, of bleeding complications 0.9 and of prosthetic valve endocarditis and paravalvular leak 0.26 (8, 7, 2 and 2 cases). The NYHA class in the 144 cases available for follow-up was I in 63%, II in 27% and III in 10%. The St. Jude Medical prosthesis thus was reliable, with good long-term performance.     

Replacement of the aortic valve in patients under 50 years of age: long-term follow-up of the St. Jude Medical prosthesis

BACKGROUND: Aortic valve replacement in the young adult (aged 18 to 50 years) is a choice between a mechanical prosthesis with attendant lifelong anticoagulation or biological prostheses of varying types that may have limited life expectancy in this age group. METHODS: The Cardiac Surgical Research Foundation database was accessed to determine long-term outcomes in patients having aortic valve replacement with the St. Jude Medical Valve. This database has been privately maintained since the world's first St. Jude Medical (SJM) valve implant in 1977. Patients were contacted by questionnaire or by telephone if the survey was not returned. Follow-up was 93% complete. RESULTS: From October 1977 through October 1997, 271 patients less than 50 years of age had isolated aortic valve replacement. Follow-up was 1957 patient years. Thirty-day operative mortality was 1.1% with 18 late deaths, 4 of which were valve related. Ninety percent of survivor INR responses indicated a frequency of monthly INR checks or less. Valve-related events including percent per patient year and mortality related to these events included thromboembolism, 6 episodes (0.3% per patient year, no deaths); anticoagulant-related bleeding, 6 events (0.3% per patient year, 2 deaths); paravalvular leak, 6 events (0.3% per patient year, 2 deaths); valve thrombosis, 2 events (0.1% per patient year, no deaths); and endocarditis, 3 events (0.15% per patient year, no deaths). There was no incidence of structural valve failure. CONCLUSIONS: The SJM valve has a long record of excellent performance with durability lasting more than 20 years. The incidence of untoward events is low and death over time due to valve-related complications is low (4 of 271). The SJM valve has become our valve of choice for younger patients.     

Acute mechanical valve thrombosis of the St. Jude medical prosthesis

From 1986 to 1996, 2585 patients underwent valve replacement with the St. Jude medical prosthesis. Sixty experienced mechanical valve thrombosis. Seventeen of 60 patients (28.3%) had isolated aortic valve replacements, 33 had isolated mitral valve replacements (55%), and 10 had double valve replacements (16.7%) (aortic and mitral valve replacement). All patients who underwent reoperation for mechanical valve thrombosis were functional Class III or IV. Against medical advice, systemic anticoagulation with warfarin sodium had been discontinued or used only intermittently. Thus, anticoagulant activity was not adequate. The diagnosis of thrombosis was made by clinical examination, laboratory findings, and echocardiography and cineradiography. Of the 60 patients, 9 patients died early after surgery or before discharge. Most of the deaths were attributed to low cardiac output. The overall hospital mortality was 15%. The overall 10-year actuarial survival rate was 82.8+/-1.6%. In our study, reoperation for thrombosed mechanical prosthesis was not an independent parameter determining mortality. Age was the only statistically important hospital mortality predictor. Of this group, 90% suffered mechanical valve obstruction within the first 5 years after operation. These results suggest that valve re-replacement appears to be a suitable surgical treatment for thrombosis of mechanical prosthetic valves, especially in the young. In these patients subsequent anticoagulation management is necessary.     

A prospective controlled trial of St. Jude versus Starr Edwards aortic and mitral valve prostheses

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of controlled trials comparing the merits of different heart valve prostheses. In this prospective randomized trial we compared Starr Edwards and St. Jude prostheses in the aortic and mitral positions. METHODS: Two hundred sixty-seven patients and 122 patients undergoing aortic and mitral valve replacement, respectively, were allocated by minimization to receive either St. Jude or Starr Edwards prostheses. Patients (2 patients were lost to follow-up) were followed up in a special clinic. Event definition, recording, and reporting were in accordance with published guidelines. RESULTS: There were no demographic differences between patients receiving the two different valve models. With the exception of infective endocarditis, we found no differences in the rates of death or complication between patients receiving a Starr Edwards prosthesis or a St. Jude prosthesis in either position. Neither were there any differences between the two valve models in either position, in terms of symptomatic relief 5 years after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: We found no differences in rates of complication or of symptomatic improvement between the Starr Edwards and St. Jude valve prostheses in either aortic or mitral position. Left ventricular function had such a marked effect on long-term survival that it overwhelmed any differences that might exist between different prosthetic designs. This confirms that historical comparisons are of limited value in deciding the respective merits of heart valve prostheses. The most reliable method of assessing surgical procedures is through prospective controlled trials.     

Surgical treatment of the prosthetic valves in reoperation

Surgical treatment and problems in patients required reoperation for malfunctioning prosthetic valves are reviewed in our institute. The cinefluoroscopy and pulse doppler echocardiography were helpful for diagnosis of artificial valve dysfunction. In recent two decades valve replacement were performed in 382 cases and number of re-implanted valve were 469. Among them the cases of reoperation were 21 and reimplanted valves were 25 (5.6%); 4.7% in aortic, 5.0% in mitral, 6.7% in tricuspid position. Three cases of those patients had three operations. Main causes of reoperation were primary tissue failure in Carpentier-Edwards porcine xenograft (6 cases, 23%) and cloth wear in Starr-Edwards ball valve (9 cases, 38%) and thrombosis in St. Jude Medical bi-leaflet valve (3 cases, 15%). In most cases St. Jude Medical valve were chosen for the alternative prosthetic valve in reoperation. We applied IABP support to seven patients for severe low cardiac output syndrome after the operation and overall mortality was 24% in reoperation. It concluded that St. Jude Medical valve may be most reliable because of low incidence of postoperative complication in our institute.     

Five-year clinical evaluation of the St. Jude Medical valve prosthesis in 136 patients

One hundred and thirty-six patients (June 1979, through May 1984) underwent mitral, aortic or double valve replacement and apico-aortic bypass with the St. Jude Medical (SJM) prosthesis, at Ryukyu University Hospital, Okinawa. Operative mortality for the entire group was 4.4 per cent. Late mortality from 1979-1984 was 6.1 per cent. There were no deaths related to mechanical failure. Warfarin anticoagulation was recommended for all patients. The incidence of thromboembolism was 0.76/100 patient years. Post operative catheterization studies in 21 patients one year after operation showed a satisfactory recovery of cardiac function. The SJM valve seems to be the satisfactory artificial valve in present use.     

Bivalvular mechanical mitral-aortic valve replacement in 254 patients: long-term results--a 22-year follow-up

BACKGROUND: We have retrospectively studied 254 patients who underwent a bivalvular mechanical mitral-aortic replacement in the cardiovascular and thoracic surgery unit of Nantes from 1979 to 1989. The follow-up was 22 years (1979 to 2001). The last patient was operated on 12 years before the end of the follow-up. METHODS: All mitral prostheses were St. Jude Medical (SJM) bileaflet valves, and the aortic prostheses were 124 monodisc Bj?rk-Shiley valves, 3 Sorin prostheses, and 127 St. Jude Medical bileaflet prostheses. The mean age was 56.8 +/- 8.5 years with a sex ratio equal to 1. Rheumatism as the etiology predominated with 79.5%. Ninety-seven percent of the patients were followed for a total of 2,779 patient-years and a mean of 11.7 years. RESULTS: Operative mortality was 7.08%. Freedom from overall mortality and valve-related mortality at 22 years were 45.7% +/- 3.6% and 73.1% +/- 3%, respectively. The linearized rates of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events were 1.07% and 0.9% per patient-year, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed age (p < 0.002), sex (p < 0.01), and degenerative etiology (p = 0.04) as independent factors of late mortality, and age, sex, degenerative disease, and tricuspid pathology were related to valve-related mortality. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows good results after mechanical mitral-aortic replacement in terms of survival rate and quality of life in surviving patients, and outlines the factors influencing long-term results as compared with isolated mitral valve replacement.