Patient satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures 6 months after delivery

Purpose

This study examined patient satisfaction with conventional complete dentures and mandibular implant overdentures opposing conventional maxillary dentures 6 months after delivery.

Materials and Methods

Sixty edentulous subjects (aged 65 to 75 years) were randomly assigned to either a mandibular conventional denture or an overdenture supported by two implants with ball-shaped retentive anchors. Patients rated their general satisfaction and other features of their prostheses, together with their ability to eat certain food items, on 100-mm visual analogue scales before assignment, and after 2 and 6 months.

Results

Both treatment groups reported greater satisfaction with their new prostheses at 6 months. General satisfaction ratings were higher in the implant group than in the conventional denture group by approximately 36% (mean difference 22.3 mm). The implant group also rated comfort (mean difference 22.4 mm), stability (mean difference 28.5 mm), and ability to chew (mean difference 17.3 mm) significantly higher. Significantly higher scores were also given by the implant group for their ability to chew certain hard foods. A trend for an increase in the differences between the groups, in favor of the implant group, was observed between the 2- and 6-month recalls, although the increase was only significant for ease of cleaning. The primary influence on general satisfaction 6 months after the delivery of the prostheses was the provision of the two-implant overdenture.

Conclusion

Edentulous seniors who received mandibular implant overdentures opposing a conventional denture rated their general satisfaction approximately 36% higher than did a comparable group provided with new conventional dentures.     

A cost comparison of mandibular two-implant overdenture and conventional denture treatment

Purpose

This article compares the cost of mandibular two-implant overdenture treatment to that of conventional denture treatment in an academic teaching hospital.

Materials and Methods

Sixty edentulous patients (aged 65 to 75 years) participated in a randomized clinical trial. All patients received a new maxillary complete denture and either a mandibular conventional denture (n=30) or an implant overdenture on two unsplinted implants (n=30). Resource-based microcosting of direct and indirect costs (eg, expenses and time cost to patients) of all scheduled and unscheduled visits was conducted through 1 year following delivery of the prostheses.

Results

Mean direct costs (1999 CD dollars) for scheduled visits in the implant and conventional groups were 2,332 dollars and 814 dollars, respectively, and mean indirect costs were 1,150 dollars and 810 dollars, respectively. Differences between the two groups were significant. Twenty-six patients in each group had unscheduled visits during the study at a median direct cost for the overdentures of 85 dollars and 64 dollars for the conventional dentures. Median indirect costs for unscheduled visits were 163 dollars and 202 dollars, respectively. These differences were not significant. Mean total costs of the overdentures were 4,245 dollars and 2,316 dollars for the conventional dentures, and the between-group difference was significant.

Conclusion

The direct cost of mandibular two-implant overdenture treatment was 2.4 times higher than that of conventional denture treatment. When indirect costs were added, the implant-to-conventional total cost ratio estimate was 1.8. These cost data can now be combined with estimates of the efficacy of the two types of prosthesis so practitioners and patients can make informed decisions about these prosthodontic treatment concepts.     

Randomized controlled clinical trial on satisfaction with resilient denture liners among edentulous patients

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to measure patients' satisfaction and their preference between mandibular dentures with permanent silicone-based resilient denture liner (SR) and conventional heat-activated acrylic resin (AR), both opposed by acrylic resin-based maxillary complete dentures.

Materials and Methods

Twenty-eight edentulous patients who had fulfilled selection criteria and provided informed consent were enrolled in this trial. Subjects were allocated randomly to either arm of cross-over groups (AR-SR/SR-AR), stratified by gender, using a random permuted block within the strata method. The AR-SR group received AR denture treatment followed by SR denture treatment. The SR-AR group received treatment in the reverse sequence. The primary outcome was patient satisfaction measured on 100-mm VAS, analyzed by two-way ANOVA and the Bonferroni multiple comparison as a post hoc test. The secondary outcome was patients' preference, evaluated by chi-square goodness-of-fit test. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed.

Results

Twenty-five subjects were enrolled in the analysis. There were no significant differences between AR and SR dentures 1, 2, and 3 months after the completion of control. Eighteen of 25 patients preferred SR dentures.

Conclusion

Although there were no significant differences in patient satisfaction ratings between the two types of dentures, a significant majority of patients preferred those with a resilient denture liner.—Reprinted with permission of Quintessence Publishing.     

Effect of mandibular ridge height on masticatory performance with mandibular conventional and implant-assisted overdentures

Purpose

This study assessed the impact of mandibular bone height on masticatory performance following treatment with a mandibular conventional denture (CD) or implant-retained overdenture (IOD).

Materials and Methods

Evaluation of masticatory performance in 63 participants was made with original CDs and 6 months after treatment completion with new dentures; 25 patients received a mandibular CD and 38 received a mandibular IOD. Anterior ridge height at the mandibular symphysis was determined on lateral cephalograms to provide subgroups of low (< or = 21 mm), moderate (> 21 mm, < 28 mm), and high (< or = 28 mm) ridge height for both CDs and IODs. Masticatory performance tests on the preferred chewing side (PS) and swallowing threshold tests were made with peanuts and carrots.

Results

Analysis of variance was used for comparisons of mean change in performance after treatment with study dentures for the 3 bone height groups; this indicated significant differences between the CD and IOD for PS masticatory performance with peanuts (P=.05) and carrots (P=.03). Post hoc tests found significant mean differences between the CDs and IODs with peanuts (P=.008) and carrots (P=.01) only in the low bone height group. Although no significant differences were found in swallowing threshold performance, the mean change scores for subjects with low bone height were greater with the IODs than those with CD for swallowing threshold performance, strokes, and time.

Discussion

It is suggested that only in patients with advanced ridge resorption is the mandibular IOD more likely than a CD to result in improvements in masticatory performance.

Conclusion

The study indicated that treatment with a mandibular IOD may improve masticatory performance only in persons with a less than adequate mandibular ridge.     

A prospective randomized clinical study comparing implant-supported fixed prostheses and overdentures in the edentulous mandible: prosthodontic production time and costs

Purpose

This work compared implant-supported fixed prostheses and overdentures in the edentulous mandible in a randomized prospective study of treatment results, clinical working hours, laboratory working hours, and laboratory costs including materials.

Materials and Methods

Seventeen subjects agreed to participate. Three standard Brånemark implants were placed between the mental foramina in each patient. After the connection of standard abutments, subjects were randomly assigned to the fixed prosthesis group (n=11) or overdenture group (n=6). Subjects in the fixed group were provided with prostheses according to the All-in-One concept. Subjects in the overdenture group received a conventional denture retained by a Dolder bar system.

Results

One implant was lost in the fixed prosthesis group after 1 year. A new implant was placed, and the prosthesis was refitted. Mean clinical working hours were 3.1 in the fixed prosthesis group and 4.1 in the overdenture group. Mean laboratory working hours were 12.5 in the fixed prosthesis group and 7.7 in the overdenture group. Total laboratory costs, including materials, were on average about 1,700 US dollars for the fixed prosthesis and 1,350 US dollars for the overdenture.

Conclusion

A fixed implant-supported prosthesis in the edentulous mandible could be provided at about the same cost as an overdenture using the method described. Provided that the early survival results prove to be long lasting, the choice between a fixed and a removable prosthesis need not be a matter of economy.—Reprinted with permission of Quintessence Publishing.     

Maintenance requirements of implant-supported fixed prostheses opposed by implant-supported fixed prostheses, natural teeth, or complete dentures: A 5-year retrospective study.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare the maintenance requirements of implant-supported fixed prostheses with cantilever arms in edentulous jaws when opposed by fixed prostheses of similar design, by natural teeth, or by complete dentures.

Materials and Methods

The maintenance requirements for the 5-year follow-up period were obtained by examining the dental records of 37 people. Six were provided with fixed prostheses in both arches, 22 with a fixed prosthesis in the mandible opposed by a complete denture, and 9 with a fixed prosthesis opposed by natural teeth. Everyone was treated with Nobel Biocare implants using standard implant and prosthetic protocols.

Results

The denture teeth and acrylic resin were repaired on 44 occasions in the group with implants in both jaws, on 14 occasions in the group with implants opposed by natural teeth, and twice in the group in which the implants were opposed by a complete denture. The group with implants in both jaws was more likely to fracture the gold-alloy framework, which occurred on six occasions. The group with implants in both jaws was significantly different from the other two groups in relation to higher incidence of fracture of the teeth and gold-alloy framework.

Conclusion

The maintenance requirements of implant-supported fixed prostheses with cantilever arms opposed by fixed prostheses of similar design were much greater than when opposed by natural teeth or complete dentures.     

Three-year clinical outcome of single implant-retained mandibular overdentures--results of preliminary prospective study

Objectives

The aim of this preliminary prospective study was to evaluate the clinical outcome, the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL), and the subjective chewing ability of patients with mandibular complete dentures retained by a single implant placed in the mandible midline.

Methods

Patients wearing complete dentures were treated with a single implant in the mandible, followed by relining of the dentures and incorporation of ball attachments for implant retention. Implant outcome, prosthodontic maintenance, subjective chewing ability, and the oral health impact profile of the patients were assessed at baseline and at four weeks after connecting the denture and implant.

Results

Eleven patients were enrolled in this investigation, and the mean observation period was 43.4 months (minimum period: 35, maximum period: 52 months). No implants were lost during observation period, but four dentures needed repair because of the fracture of the denture base in the midline area. A significant improvement was observed in the OHRQoL of the patients after the attachment of the mandibular dentures with a single midline implant. Furthermore, the subjective chewing ability of the patients was significantly improved after implant connection.

Conclusions

Within the limitations of this preliminary prospective clinical study, single implant-supported mandibular overdentures were a successful treatment option for older edentulous patients who showed improvements in their OHRQoL and chewing ability.     

Measuring patient-based outcomes: Is treatment satisfaction associated with oral health-related quality of life?

Objectives

To evaluate the level of association between patients’ denture satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in edentate patients, and to identify the determinants of satisfaction that best predict OHRQoL. The effects of time and treatment type were also assessed.

Methods

Data from 255 edentate elders who participated in a randomised clinical trial were used. OHRQoL ratings were gathered using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-20) questionnaire. The McGill Denture Satisfaction Instrument was used to assess satisfaction with treatment (mandibular conventional denture or implant overdenture). Outcomes were measured prior to treatment, then 6 and 12 months after delivery of the new prostheses. Simple linear and multiple linear regression analyses were performed to statistically analyse the relationship.

Results

When the combined effect of all factors was assessed, only two variables of denture satisfaction ratings were significantly associated with OHRQoL: chewing ability (P = .005) and oral condition (P = .002). These two variables explained 46.4% of the variance in the OHIP change scores. This association varied with time, but the variables of importance remained the same. Type of treatment, gender, age and other socio-demographic variables were not significantly associated with improvement in OHRQoL once their effects were combined with denture satisfaction ratings.

Conclusions

Within the limitations of this study, a highly positive association exists between oral health-related quality of life and denture satisfaction. Chewing ability and oral condition are the determinants of denture satisfaction best associated with OHRQoL, predicting 46.4% of its improvement following a treatment.     

A survey of the use of mandibular implant overdentures in 10 countries

Purpose

This preliminary international survey compared provision of implant-retained overdentures to fixed implant-supported prostheses for edentulous mandibles.

Materials and Methods

Questionnaires based on a 2001 Swedish study were sent to prosthodontists and specialist clinics in nine additional countries.

Results

Response rate varied from 53% to 100% in 10 national surveys and should allow careful comparison of results. The relationship between implant overdentures and fixed implant-supported prostheses in treatment of edentulous mandibles varied much; in Sweden, the proportion of overdentures was 12%, whereas it was 93% in the Netherlands. In all countries, the most common reason for choice of the overdenture was reduced cost. In all but two countries, the majority of respondents thought that patients with implant overdentures were equally or more satisfied with overdentures as those with fixed implant-supported prostheses.

Conclusion

There were great differences among the 10 countries in choice of implant treatment of the edentulous mandible. The relative proportion of mandibular overdentures to fixed prostheses was low in Sweden and Greece and varied from one to two thirds in the other countries, except the Netherlands.     

Prognostic indicators for conventional complete denture therapy: A review of the literature

Objectives

To review the current literature on prognostic indicators for conventional complete denture therapy.

Data

Original articles studying outcome measures and patient satisfaction with conventional complete dentures.

Sources

Ovid databases from 1988 to present and subsequent review of related articles from the 1960s onwards. Searches were limited to English language only and used a variety of keywords.

Conclusions

There remains a paucity of research in this area. From the best available data, construction of technically correct dentures, a well-formed mandibular ridge and accuracy of jaw relations are positive indicators for success. Patient neuroticism and a poorly formed mandibular ridge are negative indicators for success. Other prognostic indicators have not been shown to be of significant value. There exists a minority of patients who will never adapt to any conventional complete denture. This problem is more acute in the mandible than the maxilla. There is need for further research in this area.     

Implant and root supported overdentures - a literature review and some data on bone loss in edentulous jaws

PURPOSE

To present a literature review on implant overdentures after a brief survey of bone loss after extraction of all teeth.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Papers on alveolar bone loss and implant overdentures have been studied for a narrative review.

RESULTS

Bone loss of the alveolar process after tooth extraction occurs with great individual variation, impossible to predict at the time of extraction. The simplest way to prevent bone loss is to avoid extraction of all teeth. To keep a few teeth and use them or their roots for a tooth or root-supported overdenture substantially reduces bone loss. Jaws with implant-supported prostheses show less bone loss than jaws with conventional dentures. Mandibular 2-implant overdentures provide patients with better outcomes than do conventional dentures, regarding satisfaction, chewing ability and oral-health-related quality of life. There is no strong evidence for the superiority of one overdenture retention-system over the others regarding patient satisfaction, survival, peri-implant bone loss and relevant clinical factors. Mandibular single midline implant overdentures have shown promising results but long-term results are not yet available. For a maxillary overdenture 4 to 6 implants splinted with a bar provide high survival both for implants and overdenture.

CONCLUSION

In edentulous mandibles, 2-implant overdentures provide excellent long-term success and survival, including patient satisfaction and improved oral functions. To further reduce the costs a single midline implant overdenture can be a promising option. In the maxilla, overdentures supported on 4 to 6 implants splinted with a bar have demonstrated good functional results.     

Can general dentists produce successful implant overdentures with minimal training?

Objectives

This study was carried out to determine whether inexperienced dentists can provide two-implant overdentures that are as satisfactory and of the same cost as those provided by experienced prosthodontists.

Methods

Edentulous elders were enrolled in a randomized controlled clinical trial to compare the effects of mandibular conventional and two-implant overdentures on nutrition. They were randomly assigned to groups that were treated by either an experienced prosthodontist or by a newly-graduated dentist with minimal training in implant treatment. Data for this study were obtained during the treatment of the first 140 subjects enrolled. The change in patient ratings of satisfaction after treatment, laboratory costs and the number of unscheduled visits up to 6 months following prosthesis delivery were compared.

Results

Satisfaction was significantly higher with implant overdentures than with conventional dentures, but there were no differences in scores for either prosthesis between the groups treated by experienced specialists or new dentists. Furthermore, six of the seven inexperienced dentists reported that they found the mandibular two-implant overdenture easier to provide than the conventional denture.

Conclusions

The results of this study suggest that general dentists can provide successful mandibular two-implant overdentures with minimal training.     

Sensitivity of Candida albicans biofilm cells grown on denture acrylic to antifungal proteins and chlorhexidine

Objectives

Candida albicans cells form biofilms on polymeric surfaces of dentures and other prostheses introduced into the oral cavity. Many biofilm microorganisms exhibit resistance to antimicrobial agents; C. albicans cells may also develop resistance to naturally occurring antifungal peptides in human saliva including histatins (Hsts) and defensins (hBDs). Therefore, we evaluated Hst 5 activity on C. albicans biofilm cells compared to planktonic cells and measured whether surface treatment of denture acrylic with Hst 5, hBD-3, or chlorhexidine gluconate could inhibit in vitro biofilm development.

Methods

Acrylic disks were preconditioned with 500 μl saliva for 30 min, and inoculated with C. albicans cells (10⁶ cells/ml) for 1 h, at 37 °C. Non-adherent cells were removed by washing and disks and were incubated in YPD growth medium for 24, 48, and 72 h at 37 °C. Candidacidal assays were performed on 48-h-biofilms and on planktonically grown cells using Hst 5 (15.5, 31.25, and 62 μM). Cell adhesion was compared on disks pre-coated with 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate, 50 μM Hst 5, or 0.6 μM hBD-3 after 24, 48, and 72 h growth.

Results

No significant difference was observed in sensitivity to Hst 5 of biofilm cells compared to planktonic cells (p > 0.05). Pre-coating disks with hBD-3 did not inhibit biofilm development; however, Hst 5 significantly inhibited biofilm development at 72 h, while 0.12% chlorhexidine significantly inhibited biofilm development at all time intervals (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

C. albicans biofilm cells grown on denture acrylic are sensitive to killing by Hst 5. Surface coating acrylic with chlorhexidine or Hst 5 effectively inhibits biofilm growth and has potential therapeutic application.     

Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment

PURPOSE: The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to compare the relative efficacy of mandibular overdentures retained by only two implants and a bar attachment with conventional dentures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Edentulous adults, aged 35 to 65 years, were randomly assigned to two groups that received either a mandibular conventional denture (n = 48) or an overdenture supported by two endosseous implants with a connecting bar (n = 54). All subjects rated their general satisfaction and other features of their original dentures and their new prostheses (comfort, stability, ability to chew, speech, esthetics, and cleaning ability) on 100-mm visual analogue scales prior to treatment and 2 months postdelivery. Oral health-related quality of life was also evaluated pre- and posttreatment. RESULTS: Multiple regression analysis revealed that the mean general satisfaction was significantly higher in the overdenture group than in the conventional denture group (P = .0001). Age, gender, marital status, and income were not significantly associated with ratings of general satisfaction. Furthermore, the implant group gave significantly higher ratings on three additional measures of the prostheses (comfort, stability, and ease of chewing; P < .05). CONCLUSION: A mandibular two-implant overdenture opposed by a maxillary conventional denture is a more satisfactory treatment than conventional dentures for edentulous middle-aged adults.     

Mandibular first molar with six separate canals

Introduction

Many anatomical variations can occur within the mandibular first molar. Commonly, 3-4 canals are located, but as many as 6-7 canals have been reported.

Methods

This report describes a case of a mandibular first molar with 6 separate canals (3 mesial and 3 distal) that was instrumented with conventional hand and rotary files and obturated by using a hybrid warm vertical compaction technique.

Results

Recall examination as far as 3 years post-treatment found no sensitivity to percussion or palpation and recall radiographs after treatment show resolution of the previous apical periodontitis.

Conclusions

The existence of such teeth as these underlies the importance of looking for additional canals.     

From porcelain-fused-to-metal to zirconia: Clinical and experimental considerations

Objective

The interest of dental research in metal-free restorations has been rising in the last 20 years following the introduction of innovative all-ceramic materials in the daily practice. In particular, high strength ceramics and related CAD/CAM techniques have widely increased the clinical indications of metal-free prostheses, showing more favourable mechanical characteristics compared to the early ceramic materials.The purpose of the present paper is providing a brief review on the all-ceramic dental materials, evaluating pros and cons in the light of the most recent scientific results and of the authors’ clinical experience.

Materials

A structured review of the literature was given on the basis of medical and engineering papers published in the last decades on the use of dental ceramics and zirconia in particular. The experimental and clinical findings of the most relevant researches were reported.

Results

Zirconia is one of the most promising restorative materials, because it yields very favourable mechanical properties and reasonable esthetic. Several in vitro and in vivo investigations reported suitable strength and mechanical performances of zirconia, compatible with clinical serviceability as a framework material for both single crowns and short-span fixed partial dentures. However, clinical results are not comparable, at the moment, with conventional metal-ceramic restorations, neither is there sufficient long-term data for validating the clinical potential of zirconia in the long run.

Significance

The use of zirconia frameworks for long-span fixed partial dentures or for implant-supported restorations is currently under evaluation and further in vivo, long-term clinical studies will be needed to provide scientific evidence for drawing solid guidelines.     

Does mandibular edentulous bone height affect prosthetic treatment success?

Objectives

The aim of this study is to determine whether mandibular bone height affects patients’ ratings of satisfaction and function with mandibular 2-implant overdentures (IODs) and conventional dentures (CDs).

Methods

214 edentulous elders were randomly allocated into 2 groups and treated with maxillary CDs and either mandibular CDs or IODs. Classifications of mandibular bone height were carried out on panoramic radiographs using 4 published methods. At baseline and 6 months after delivery, all participants rated their satisfaction with their prostheses using the McGill Denture Satisfaction Instrument. Independent t-tests and a linear multivariable regression model were used for statistical analyses.

Results

Mandibular bone height has no effect on patients’ ratings of general satisfaction, nor on ratings of ability to chew, stability, comfort, aesthetics and ability to speak at 6 months (p > 0.05, linear regression). There were significant between treatment differences in ratings of general satisfaction, comfort, stability and ability to chew from all mandibular bone height categories, with higher ratings assigned to IODs (p < 0.01, t-tests). Linear regression analyses confirmed that, for general satisfaction, as well as ability to chew, stability, comfort, aesthetics and ability to speak, treatment with IODs contributes to higher satisfaction ratings (p < 0.001), while mandibular bone height does not.

Conclusions

The evidence demonstrates that mandibular bone height has no effect on patients’ satisfaction with the function, chewing ability and comfort of their prostheses. Furthermore, no matter how much mandibular bone, these results suggest that edentulous elders will benefit more from mandibular IODs than from CDs.     

Effectiveness of a combination denture-cleaning method versus a mechanical method: comparison of denture cleanliness,patient satisfaction,and oral health-related quality of life

Purpose

Effective denture plaque control is necessary in elderly individuals to prevent oral and systemic diseases. However, comparative studies of denture cleaning methods are limited, especially those investigating patient satisfaction. The present study aimed to evaluate effectiveness of a mechanical denture cleaning method versus a combination of mechanical and chemical methods in terms of denture cleanliness, patient satisfaction, and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL).

Influence of implant number on the biomechanical behaviour of mandibular implant-retained/supported overdentures: A three-dimensional finite element analysis

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate strain distribution in peri-implant bone, stress in the abutments and denture stability of mandibular overdentures anchored by different numbers of implants under different loading conditions, through three-dimensional finite element analysis (3D FEA).

Methods

Four 3D finite element models of mandibular overdentures were established, using between one and four Straumann implants with Locator attachments. Three types of load were applied to the overdenture in each model: 100 N vertical and inclined loads on the left first molar and a 100 N vertical load on the lower incisors. The biomechanical behaviours of peri-implant bone, implants, abutments and overdentures were recorded.

Results

Under vertical load on the lower incisors, the single-implant overdenture rotated over the implant from side to side, and no obvious increase of strain was found in peri-implant bone. Under the same loading conditions, the two-implant-retained overdenture showed more apparent rotation around the fulcrum line passing through the two implants, and the maximum equivalent stress in the abutments was higher than in the other models. In the three-implant-supported overdenture, no strain concentration was found in cortical bone around the middle implant under three loading conditions.

Conclusions and clinical significance

Single-implant-retained mandibular overdentures do not show damaging strain concentration in the bone around the only implant and may be a cost-effective treatment option for edentulous patients. A third implant can be placed between the original two when patients rehabilitated by two-implant overdentures report constant and obvious denture rotation around the fulcrum line.