Protruding atheromas in the thoracic aorta: a newly recognized source of cerebral and systemic embolization

Up to 40% of stroke patients do not have an obvious etiology for their illness. Because transthoracic echocardiography is often negative in these patients, there has been increasing enthusiasm for transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) as a newer tool for evaluating patients with embolic disease. In a study of patients referred because of unexplained stroke or transient ischemic attacks, the most common finding was protruding atheroma in the aortic arch. In a case control study, protruding aortic atheromas were found in 33 of the 122 patients with emboli (27%). Mobile components to the atheromas were found in 11 case patients, and there were no mobile components found in any control patients. It is also possible that protruding aortic atheromas may play a role in patients with other sources of emboli (e.g., carotid disease). Atheromas may also cause emboli during catheterization, balloon pump placement, and cardiopulmonary bypass. The pathological composition of the lesions seen on TEE has been atheroma with superimposed thrombus. The correct treatment for patients with embolization due to protruding aortic atheromas has not yet been determined, although anticoagulation may play a role, since the mobile components to these lesions appear to be thrombus. We have recommended surgery for several patients. However, the operation is a major one with major potential complications, including aortic dissection. TEE should be done in patients with unexplained emboli, and it may also play a role in patients with other sources of embolization. TEE should be considered in elderly patients or those with extensive vascular disease before cardiac catheterization or heart surgery. In addition, cannulation techniques during bypass can be modified to avoid atheromas. The ideal medical and/or surgical approaches to patients with protruding atheromas remain to be clarified.     

Transesophageal echocardiography for the evaluation and management of patients with cerebral ischemia.

To prevent recurrent strokes and transient ischemic attacks, considerable attention is devoted to investigating the etiology of acute cerebral ischemia in the large subpopulation of patients without an easily identifiable cause. In general, transthoracic echocardiography is an insensitive tool for the evaluation of patients with cerebral ischemia, unless clinical signs and/or symptoms of cardiac disease are present. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), because of its increased sensitivity for aortic arch atheromata, atrial septal pathology, left atrial thrombi, and valvular abnormalities, is the preferred cardiac imaging modality, especially in young patients, older patients with hypertension or systemic atherosclerosis, and patients with prosthetic heart valves. This paper reviews the prognostic and therapeutic impact of TEE in patients with cerebral ischemia, specifically focusing on the ability of information obtained by this technique to alter patient management and improve risk stratification.     

Superiority of transesophageal echocardiography in detecting cardiac source of embolism in patients with cerebral ischemia of uncertain etiology

The diagnostic yield of transesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography for identifying a cardiac source of embolism was compared in 79 patients presenting with unexplained stroke or transient ischemic attack. There were 35 men and 44 women with a mean age of 59 years (range 17 to 84); 52% had clinical cardiac disease. Both transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiograms were performed using Doppler color flow and contrast imaging. Transesophageal echocardiography identified a potential cardiac source of embolism in 57% of the overall study group compared with only 15% by transthoracic echocardiography (p less than 0.0005). Compared with transthoracic echocardiography, transesophageal echocardiography more frequently identified atrial septal aneurysm associated with a patent foramen ovale (9 versus 1 of 79 patients, p less than 0.005), left atrial thrombus or tumor (6 versus 0 of 79 patients, p less than 0.05) and left atrial spontaneous contrast (13 versus 0 of 79 patients, p less than 0.0005). All cases of left atrial thrombus or spontaneous contrast were identified in patients with clinically identified cardiac disease. In the 38 patients with no cardiac disease, transesophageal echocardiography identified isolated atrial septal aneurysm and atrial septal aneurysm with a patent foramen ovale more frequently than transthoracic echocardiography (8 versus 2 of 38 patients, p less than 0.05). The two techniques had a similar rate of identifying apical thrombus and mitral valve prolapse. Overall, transesophageal echocardiography identified abnormalities in 39% of patients with no cardiac disease versus 19% for transthoracic echocardiography (p less than 0.005). Thus, transesophageal echocardiography identifies potential cardiac sources of embolism in the majority of patients presenting with unexplained stroke.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Comparison of transthoracic and transesophageal assessment of prosthetic valve dysfunction

Transesophageal echocardiography has added another dimension to the assessment of prosthetic valve dysfunction with high-resolution images that allow for more detailed structural evaluation of tissue and mechanical valves. This study is a retrospective analysis of 140 prosthetic valves (90 tissue, 50 mechanical) in the mitral (89), aortic (45), and tricuspid (6) position in 116 patients studied by transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography techniques. Transesophageal echocardiography was consistently better than the transthoracic technique in the evaluation of structural abnormalities of tissue valves in the mitral and aortic positions with respect to leaflet thickening, prolapse, flail, and vegetations. With transesophageal echocardiography, five tissue mitral valves had flail leaflets that were not identified by the transthoracic technique. Transesophageal echocardiography was better than transthoracic in the detection, quantification, and localization of prosthetic mitral regurgitation. Physiological mitral regurgitation was detected in 31 valves by transesophageal echocardiography compared to seven by transthoracic technique. By transesophageal echocardiography, mitral regurgitation was paravalvular in 24% compared with 4% by transthoracic technique. Left atrial spontaneous contrast was seen in 42% of the patients with a mitral prosthesis detected only by transesophageal echocardiography. Six patients had left atrial or left atrial appendage thrombus and in five patients they were detected only by transesophageal echocardiography. We conclude that transesophageal echocardiography should be a complimentary test to transthoracic studies in patients with suspected prosthetic valve dysfunction or for the follow-up of older tissue valves.     

Protruding atheromas in the thoracic aorta and systemic embolization

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether protruding atheromas in the thoracic aorta are a risk factor for systemic embolization. DESIGN: Case-control study. SETTING: A referral hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 122 patients with a history of stroke, transient ischemic attack, or peripheral emboli and an equal number of age- and sex-matched control patients. MEASUREMENTS: Evaluation using transesophageal echocardiography was done in case patients to detect protruding atheromas in the thoracic aorta and in control patients for cardiac indications other than emboli. MAIN RESULTS: Matched logistic regression showed that the presence of protruding atheromas was strongly related to the occurrence of embolic symptoms (odds ratio, 3.2; 95% Cl, 1.6 to 6.5; P less than 0.001). Furthermore, atheromas with mobile components were present only in case patients. When known risk factors for stroke (hypertension and diabetes) were added to the model, the presence of protruding atheromas remained an independent risk factor for embolic symptoms (odds ratio, 3.8). Hypertension was also independently associated with embolic symptoms (odds ratio, 2.7), but diabetes was not (odds ratio, 1.0). CONCLUSION: Protruding atheromas in the thoracic aorta can be detected by transesophageal echocardiography and should be considered as a cause of strokes, transient ischemic attacks, and peripheral emboli.     

Protruding aortic atheromas predict stroke in elderly patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass: experience with intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography.

Protruding atheromas of the aortic arch identified by transesophageal echocardiography have been implicated as a cause of stroke in elderly patients. One hundred thirty patients greater than or equal to 65 years of age were studied with intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography to detect aortic arch protruding atheromas and determine if these patients were at higher risk for perioperative stroke. Protruding atheromas were identified in 23 (18%) of 130 patients. In 19 (83%) of these 23 patients, palpation of the aortic arch at operation did not identify significant abnormalities. Five patients (4%) had perioperative stroke. Logistic regression identified aortic arch atheroma as the only historical or procedural variable that was predictive of stroke (odds ratio 5.8, 95% confidence interval 1.2 to 27.9, p less than 0.03). A history of peripheral or cerebrovascular disease, presence of aortic calcification, cardiac risk factors, age and duration of cardiopulmonary bypass did not predict stroke. In contrast, patients with protruding atheromas with mobile components were at highest risk. There were 3 (25%) of 12 patients with a mobile atheroma who had a stroke versus 2 (2%) of 118 patients without a mobile atheroma (chi-square = 10.3, p = 0.001). Displacement and detachment of the frail, protruding atherosclerotic material by aortic arch cannulation or by the high pressure jet emanating from the cannula tip may play an important role in the creation of embolization and stroke.     

Transthoracic echocardiographic diagnosis of mobile aortic arch atherothrombosis associated with stroke

Aortic arch atherosclerosis is associated with an increased risk of stroke or TIA. Up to now, transesophageal echocardiography has been the standard method for diagnosing protruding and/or mobile aortic arch atherosclerosis. We report a case where a mobile aortic arch atheroma was diagnosed using transthoracic echo in a patient with a recent stroke.     

Transesophageal echocardiography is superior to transthoracic echocardiography in the diagnosis of sinus venosus atrial septal defect

The purpose of this study was to compare transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography in the diagnosis of various types of atrial septal defects. Forty-one adult patients with the clinical diagnosis of atrial septal defect were studied by transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography (30 women, 11 men; 18 to 81 years of age). Transthoracic echocardiography demonstrated the atrial septal defect in 33 patients (secundum type in 28, primum type in 3 and sinus venosus type in 2). Transesophageal echocardiography demonstrated the defect in all 41 patients. Thus, in 8 (20%) of 41 patients the atrial septal defect was demonstrated by transesophageal and not by transthoracic echocardiography. Six of the eight had a sinus venosus type atrial septal defect; the other two patients had a secundum atrial septal defect (one of these two had a technically poor transthoracic echocardiogram and the other had a small atrial septal defect). Transthoracic echocardiography, therefore, failed to demonstrate the sinus venosus defect in six (75%) of eight patients. An anomalous venous connection associated with the sinus venosus defect was visualized by transesophageal echocardiography in seven of the eight patients but was not seen on transthoracic echocardiography in any patient. Sinus venosus type atrial septal defects are frequently not visualized in adults by conventional transthoracic echocardiography. Transesophageal echocardiography is recommended when an atrial septal defect is clinically suspected but cannot be visualized by transthoracic echocardiography.     

Atheromas of the thoracic aorta: clinical and therapeutic update

Atherosclerotic lesions of the thoracic aorta have recently been recognized as an important cause of stroke and peripheral embolization, which may result in severe neurologic damage as well as multiorgan failure and death. Their prevalence is approximately 27% in patients with previous embolic events. Transesophageal echocardiography is the modality of choice for the diagnosis of these atheromas, although computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and intraoperative epiaortic ultrasound are complementary. Two clinical syndromes account for the embolic phenomena, atheroemboli and, more commonly, thromboemboli. In addition to such superimposed thrombi, plaque thickness (especially > or =4 mm) also correlates with embolic risk. This risk is high, with 12% of patients having a recurrent stroke within approximately one year, and up to 33% of patients having a stroke or peripheral embolus. In addition, aortic atheromas (as seen with intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography and intraoperative epiaortic ultrasound) are an important cause of stroke during heart surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass. Such strokes occur during approximately 12% of cardiac operations employing cardiopulmonary bypass when aortic arch atheromas are seen with transesophageal echocardiography (six times the general intraoperative stroke rate). Although anticoagulant strategies have been reported with encouraging results in nonrandomized studies, prospective, randomized data must be developed before an effective and safe treatment strategy can be determined. This review details the current state of knowledge in this area, including the clinical and pathologic evidence that thoracic aortic atherosclerosis is an important embolic source, data which guide current therapy and future directions for clinical investigation.     

Use of echocardiography in detecting cardiac sources of embolus

Up to 20% of all ischemic strokes are felt to be the result of emboli from the heart. High resolution transthoracic (TTE) and transesophageal (TEE) echocardiography have been the principal diagnostic tools for detecting associated cardiac abnormalities and for guiding medical and surgical approaches to these patients. In addition to identifying the precise location and morphological characteristics of intracardiac masses, echocardiography has improved our ability to predict embolic potential of these masses. Specific cardiac lesions that are predisposed to stroke and are readily identifiable by echocardiography include: cardiac thrombi, valvular vegetations, cardiac tumors, aortic atheroma, atrial septal aneurysm, and regional left ventricular wall abnormalities. Careful interrogation of patients with cerebrovascular accidents has identified a potential cardiac source of embolus in approximately 30%. This is largely due to the advent of TEE, which has provided much better assessment of posterior cardiac chambers including left atrium and left atrial appendage. Use of TEE in identifying a cardiac source of embolus is indicated in patients with stroke who are young, have no apparent cerebrovascular disease, or have recurrent embolic events. Echocardiography is an essential diagnostic tool in evaluating patients with a suspected cardiac source of embolus. TTE and TEE provide invaluable information regarding the majority of cardiac sources of embolus.     

Simultaneous transesophageal cardioversion and echocardiography: Feasibility and safety

BACKGROUND: Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is routinely used to exclude atrial thrombus prior to cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF). Because the TEE probe lies adjacent to the atria, cardioversion using an electrode attached to the TEE probe should allow for immediate low-energy transesophageal cardioversion. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate a cardioversion electrode sheath that can be affixed to conventional TEE probes for simultaneous thrombus exclusion and cardioversion of AF. METHODS: A thin electrode was integrated into a latex or polyurethane sheath covering a conventional TEE probe. TEE thrombus exclusion and biphasic transesophageal cardioversion using a step-up protocol were performed during deep sedation. Esophagoscopy was performed immediately after cardioversion and after 1 week. RESULTS: TEE was performed in 27 patients. One patient showed left atrial thrombi. Transesophageal cardioversion was successful in 25 of the remaining 26 patients. Mean atrial cardioversion threshold was 63 +/- 48 J. Transesophageal cardioversion restored sinus rhythm in two patients with unsuccessful transthoracic cardioversion. Transesophageal cardioversion in deep sedation was well tolerated. Esophagoscopy revealed slight mucosal damage in three patients at the site of shock application; two of these patients showed signs of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Mucosal damage unrelated to the site of shock delivery was noted in three patients. CONCLUSION: Atrial thrombus exclusion and transesophageal cardioversion of AF via a disposable cardioversion sheath offers the opportunity to perform transesophageal cardioversion and TEE thrombus exclusion during one sedation. It may not be suitable for use in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Transesophageal cardioversion may establish sinus rhythm in selected patients refractory to transthoracic cardioversion.     

Echocardiographic risk stratification for ischemic stroke in non‐rheumatic atrial fibrillation: Importance of aortic plaques detected by transesophageal echocardiography*

Background: The aim of the present paper was to assess the prevalence of atherosclerotic aortic plaques in non‐rheumatic atrial fibrillation and their relation to ischemic stroke. Although aortic plaques are frequently seen in the elderly, their significance remains unclear in relation to ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Methods: Transesophageal echocardiography was performed on 56 patients (age 61 ± 10 years) with atrial fibrillation. The aorta was divided into two segments (i.e. the proximal aorta that includes the ascending aorta and the aortic arch proximal to the ostium of the left subclavian artery, and the distal aorta that is the descending aorta distal to the left subclavian artery). Thickened intima = 3 mm in thickness was defined as aortic plaques. Results: Ischemic stroke was found in 14 of the 56 patients. Aortic plaques were detected in 25 of the 56 patients. All of these 25 patients had aortic plaques in the proximal aorta, and 17 of them also had aortic plaques in the distal aorta. Ischemic stroke was found in 11 of the 25 patients (44%) with aortic plaques, and three of the 31 patients (10%) without aortic plaques (P < 0.01). Conversely, aortic plaques were detected in 11 of the 14 patients (79%) with ischemic stroke, and in 14 of the 42 patients (33%) without (P < 0.01). The patients with ischemic stroke had a larger left atrium (47 ± 5 vs 43 ± 6 mm; P < 0.05) than those without. Aortic plaques were a correlate only of previous ischemic stroke (P < 0.05) by multiple logistic regression analysis. Conclusions: Atherosclerotic aortic plaques detected by transesophageal echocardio‐graphy are a correlate of previous ischemic stroke in patients with non‐rheumatic atrial fibrillation.     

Transthoracic echocardiography versus transesophageal echocardiography in detecting cardiac sources of embolism

Although the yield of potential cardiac sources of embolism by echocardiography in patients with stroke and arterial embolism has been low, with the advent of transesophageal echocardiography, a renewed enthusiasm for echocardiography in these patients has developed. This article reviews the six major studies comparing transthoracic to transesophageal echocardiography in the search for potential cardiac sources of embolism. The overall yield of transesophageal echocardiography in these studies for potential cardiac sources of embolism is 43% compared to 14% by transthoracic echocardiography in a total of 367 patients. In patients without clinical cardiac disease, the yield is lower but still substantially higher by transesophageal echocardiography (24% compared to 7% by transthoracic echocardiography). For left atrial thrombus, left atrial spontaneous contrast, patent foreman ovale, and atrial septal aneurysm (ASA), transesophageal echocardiography is clearly superior than transthoracic echocardiography. Data on the detection of mitral valve prolapse and left ventricular thrombus are conflicting and neither method is clearly superior. In addition, transesophageal echocardiography identifies certain abnormalities including debris in the aorta and prosthetic strands that transthoracic echocardiography is incapable of identifying. Although transthoracic echocardiography should continue to be the initial screening modality for stroke patients, transesophageal echocardiography should be performed when surface findings are negative or equivocal in patients with likely cardioembolic stroke.     

Transesophageal echocardiography in critically ill patients

The feasibility, safety and clinical impact of transesophageal echocardiography were evaluated in 51 critically ill intensive care unit patients (28 men and 23 women; mean age 63 years) in whom transthoracic echocardiography was inadequate. At the time of transesophageal echocardiography, 30 patients (59%) were being mechanically ventilated. Transesophageal echocardiography was performed without significant complications in 49 patients (96%), and 2 patients with heart failure had worsening of hemodynamic and respiratory difficulties after insertion of the transesophageal probe. The most frequent indication, in 25 patients (49%), was unexplained hemodynamic instability. Other indications included evaluation of mitral regurgitation severity, prosthetic valvular dysfunction, endocarditis, aortic dissection and potential donor heart. In 30 patients (59%), transesophageal echocardiography identified cardiovascular problems that could not be clearly diagnosed by transthoracic echocardiography. In the remaining patients, transesophageal echocardiography permitted confident exclusion of suspected abnormalities because of its superior imaging qualities. Cardiac surgery was prompted by transesophageal echocardiographic findings in 12 patients (24%) and these findings were confirmed at operation in all. Therefore, transesophageal echocardiography can be safely performed and has a definite role in the diagnosis and expeditious management of critically ill cardiovascular patients.     

Racial differences in aortic atheroma in patients undergoing transesophageal echocardiography for unexplained stroke or transient ischemic attack

Racial differences in the prevalence of complex thoracic aortic atheroma were evaluated in 318 patients referred for transesophageal echocardiography after unexplained stroke or transient ischemic attack. African-Americans were found to have fewer complex thoracic aortic atheroma and fewer combined cardiac sources of embolus than Caucasian patients. This finding persists after adjusting for racial differences in atherosclerotic risk factors.     

Impact of transesophageal color flow Doppler echocardiography in current cardiology practice

Of 3,480 patients who were referred for cardiac ultrasound evaluation, 230 patients (6.6%) underwent transesophageal echocardiography because the transthoracic study was not feasible, technically inadequate, or provided insufficient diagnostic information for optimal patient management. There were 149 inpatients and 81 outpatients. The majority (182 patients, 79%) had aortic or mitral disorders. In 166 patients (72%), transesophageal echocardiography played a significant role in patient management. Transesophageal echocardiography was most useful in evaluating diseases of the aorta (dissection, root abscess, or aneurysm), mitral prosthesis, complications of endocarditis, left atrial appendage thrombi, and in determining the cause of mitral insufficiency. Transesophageal echocardiography was useful in the evaluation of critically ill patients and those with severe lung disease.     

Protruding atherosclerotic plaque in the aortic arch of patients with systemic embolization: a new finding seen by transesophageal echocardiography

Patients with unexplained stroke or other embolic phenomena are often referred for echocardiography. The aortic arch is not usually visualized in detail during routine echocardiography; however, with the introduction of transesophageal echocardiography, this area may be seen with great resolution. We recently studied three patients who had embolic events, and transesophageal echocardiography showed a new and unexpected finding; large, protrusive plaques in the aortic arch and descending aorta, which have mobile projections that move freely with the blood flow. These lesions could be responsible for embolic syndromes, especially after catheter manipulation in the aorta.     

Comparison of transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography in evaluation of 47 Starr-Edwards prosthetic valves.

OBJECTIVES. Our objectives were to characterize by transesophageal echocardiography the normal appearance of the Starr-Edwards prosthetic heart valve and to compare the utility of transesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography in detection of valve abnormality. BACKGROUND. The Starr-Edwards prosthetic heart valve, the first mechanical valve to be used, has demonstrated excellent durability. METHODS. Fifty transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiographic studies on 37 patients with 47 Starr-Edwards prosthetic valves were analyzed retrospectively. Six cases of surgically confirmed infective endocarditis were studied. RESULTS. Vegetation or abscess formation, or both, was identified by transesophageal echocardiography in all six cases of infective endocarditis but was found in only one of these cases by transthoracic echocardiography. Thrombus was detected by transesophageal echocardiography in 9 of 11 patients with transient ischemic attacks or stroke and in 2 patients by transthoracic echocardiography with 3 confirmed at surgery. In 26 of the 30 patients with a mitral Starr-Edwards valve, the valve demonstrated a trivial or mild "closing volume" early systolic or holosystolic leak on transesophageal echocardiography alone. Transthoracic evaluation identified significant mitral regurgitation in six of the eight patients who had this finding on transesophageal echocardiography. Serial studies were performed to assess response to treatment or need for surgical intervention in eight patients. Seventeen valves have been implanted for 12 years; six of these had significant leakage without apparent cause, a finding not observed more recently implanted valves. CONCLUSIONS. These observations demonstrated the unique utility of transesophageal echocardiography in patients with Starr-Edwards prosthetic valve dysfunction, endocarditis or thrombus formation, and of the clear superiority of transesophageal echocardiography over transthoracic echocardiography in these situations.     

Enhanced detection of ischemic myocardium by transesophageal dobutamine stress echocardiography: comparison with simultaneous transthoracic echocardiography

The diagnostic accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography is limited in patients with poor transthoracic acoustic windows. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) overcomes these limitations and thus may increase the clinical usefulness of dobutamine stress echocardiography. The present study was designed to compare the diagnostic accuracies of transesophageal and transthoracic dobutamine stress echocardiography for the identification of coronary artery disease (CAD) in a cohort of patients with a higher incidence of poor acoustic windows. Forty-two male patients (mean age, 66 +/- 9 years) underwent dobutamine stress echocardiography with simultaneous transesophageal and transthoracic imaging. Coronary arteriography was performed in 28 patients (67%). Transesophageal imaging adequately visualized 99.6% of left ventricular segments compared with 76.2% visualized by transthoracic imaging (P < 0.0001). There was substantial agreement between the two techniques for segmental wall motion analysis at baseline (kappa 0.76; 95% CI, 0.70-0.82); however, at peak dobutamine dose, agreement was significantly reduced (kappa 0.62; 95% CI, 0.55-0.69). The sensitivity (88% vs 75%), specificity (100% vs 75%), and positive predictive value (100% vs 80%) for the identification of CAD were all superior for transesophageal imaging. Transesophageal imaging correctly identified 11 of the 12 patients (92%) with multivessel disease compared with 5 patients (42%) identified by transthoracic imaging (P < 0.03). There were no major complications. Transesophageal dobutamine stress echocardiography is a safe, feasible, and accurate technique for the identification and risk stratification of patients with CAD. Transesophageal imaging appears to be superior to transthoracic imaging for identifying both the presence and extent of CAD, specifically in patients with poor acoustic windows.     

Single-plane transesophageal echocardiography for assessing function of mechanical or bioprosthetic valves in the aortic valve position.

To assess the value and limitations of single-plane transesophageal echocardiography in the evaluation of prosthetic aortic valve function, 89 patients (69 mechanical and 20 bioprosthetic aortic valves) were studied by combined transthoracic and transesophageal 2-dimensional and color flow Doppler echocardiography. In the assessment of aortic regurgitation, the transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiographic findings were concordant in 71 of 89 patients (80%). In 8 patients, the degree of aortic regurgitation was underestimated by the transthoracic approach; in each case the quality of the transthoracic echocardiogram was poor. In 10 patients, transesophageal echocardiography failed to detect trivial aortic regurgitation due to acoustic shadowing of the left ventricular outflow tract from a mechanical valve in the mitral valve position. Transesophageal echocardiography was superior to transthoracic echocardiography in diagnosing perivalvular abscess, subaortic perforation, valvular dehiscence, torn or thickened bioprosthetic aortic valve cusps, and in clearly distinguishing perivalvular from valvular aortic regurgitation. Transesophageal echocardiography correctly diagnosed bioprosthetic valve obstruction in 1 patient, but failed to diagnose mechanical valve obstruction in another. In conclusion, transesophageal echocardiography offers no advantage over the transthoracic approach in the detection and quantification of prosthetic aortic regurgitation unless the transthoracic image quality is poor. Transesophageal echocardiography is limited in detecting mechanical valve obstruction and in detecting aortic regurgitation in the presence of a mechanical prosthesis in the mitral valve position. However, it is superior to transthoracic echocardiography in identifying perivalvular pathology, differentiating perivalvular from valvular regurgitation and in defining the anatomic abnormality responsible for the prosthetic valve dysfunction. Combined transthoracic and transesophageal examination provides complete anatomic and hemodynamic assessment of prosthetic aortic valve function.