Histamine H(3)-receptor antagonism improves memory retention and reverses the cognitive deficit induced by scopolamine in a two-trial place recognition task.

Several reports have indicated that, under different experimental conditions, the administration of histamine H(3)-receptor antagonists exerts procognitive effects by activating central histaminergic transmission. In the present study the action of thioperamide, a H(3)-receptor blocker, is investigated on consolidation and recall mechanisms of the rat place recognition memory. The animals have been tested on a two-trial delayed comparison paradigm in a Y-maze. Thioperamide enhances the memory retention when administered intraperitoneally (i.p.) post-acquisition (0.7 and 5.0 mg/kg are ineffective, whereas the dose of 2.0 mg/kg improves memory) but does not affect the rat performance when injected 45 min prior to the testing trial. The post-acquisition effect of thioperamide is time-dependent since the administration of the drug 30 min after the end of the training trial has no effect on memory. In addition, thioperamide reverses the amnesia induced by the post-acquisition treatment with 0.02 mg/kg i.p. of scopolamine (SCOP). The procognitive effect of thioperamide is not modified by the contemporary administration of pyrilamine, an histamine H(1)-receptor antagonist. On the contrary, the blockade of H(2)-receptors by zolantidine 10 mg/kg reverses both the effect of thioperamide alone and the drug action on the scopolamine-induced memory deficit. The results indicate that the neuronal histamine released in consequence of the post-acquisition thioperamide treatment improves place recognition memory through the activation of postsynaptic H(2)-receptors.     

The H3 antagonist thioperamide reveals conditioned preference for a context associated with an inactive small dose of cocaine in C57BL/6J mice

The histaminergic system has been speculated to be involved in the inhibitory control of drug reward, H1 and H2 antagonists having been found to potentiate conditioned place preference induced by morphine or cocaine. In contrast, the role of H3 receptors in cocaine-induced place preference is still unknown. The present study tested the effects of thioperamide (0, 10 and 20 mg/kg, i.p.), an H3 autoreceptor antagonist, on the development of a conditioned place preference induced by cocaine (0, 2 and 8 mg/kg, i.p.) in C57BL/6J mice. Thioperamide was injected 10 min before each cocaine-pairing session. The activity scores recorded on the first cocaine-pairing session were also used to test the effects of thioperamide on cocaine-induced locomotor activity. Thioperamide alone had no reinforcing effects and did not affect the conditioned place preference induced by 8 mg/kg cocaine. However, thioperamide dose-dependently revealed a conditioned place preference induced by 2 mg/kg cocaine, a dose that was inactive per se. Finally, thioperamide dose-dependently potentiated the stimulant effects of cocaine, in spite of its slight hypolocomotor effect when given alone. Our results strongly suggest that H3 antagonists potentiate the stimulant and reinforcing effects of cocaine in mice.     

Facilitatory effect of the dopamine D4 receptor agonist PD168,077 on memory consolidation of an inhibitory avoidance learned response in C57BL/6J mice

The still unknown contribution of the D4 receptors to memory consolidation was studied examining the memory effects of the dopamine D4 agonist PD168,077, the putative dopamine D4 antagonist L745,870, their mutual combination, and the combination of the D4 agonist with representative compounds acting as agonist or antagonist on the D1, D2 and the D3 receptors. Memory consolidation was assessed in C57BL/6J mice using the one-trial step-through inhibitory avoidance task, the compounds being injected immediately after training (foot-shock) and performance measured 24h later. PD168,077 (0.5-10mg/kg) dose-dependently improved memory performance and L745,870 (0.05-5mg/kg) at doses lower than 1mg/kg increased and at doses higher than 1mg/kg impaired memory performance. PD168,077 did not affect the paradoxical promnesic effect of low doses (0.1-0.5mg/kg) of L745,870, but antagonised the memory-impairing effect induced by 5mg/kg L745,870. The D1 antagonist SCH23390 (0.025-0.05 mg/kg) and the D2 antagonist eticlopride (0.01-0.05 mg/kg) antagonised the promnesic effects of PD168,077, which attenuated the decreasing effect on memory consolidation of both D1 and D2 antagonists. Accordingly, the D1 agonist SKF38393 (5-20mg/kg) and the D2 agonist quinelorane (0.1-1 mg/kg) both synergistically magnified the memory-improving effects of the D4 agonist. The dopamine D3 antagonist U99194A (2.5-10mg/kg) did not affect the promnesic effects induced by the D4 agonist, which nevertheless abolished the U99194A-induced promnesic effects. Additionally, the amnesic effects produced by the D3 agonist 7-OH-DPAT (0.01-1 microg/kg) was attenuated by PD168,077. These results suggest a potential role of dopamine D4 receptors in memory consolidation, which would be similar to that of the D1 and D2 receptors and probably opposite to that of the D3 receptors.     

Oxiracetam prevents the MK-801 induced amnesia for the elevated plus-maze in mice

We investigated the effect of the nootropic substance oxiracetam on the impairment of memory induced in mice by the non-competitive NMDA antagonist MK-801. Memory capacities of animals having different experience were evaluated using the elevated plus-maze test. Oxiracetam was injected immediately after the acquisition session(s), MK-801 was given 30 min before the retention session which followed 24 h after the acquisition session(s). In slightly experienced animals (Section 3.1), oxiracetam (3 and 30 mg/kg, s.c.) prevented MK-801 (0.15 mg/kg, i.p.) induced memory deficits characterized by a prolongation of the transfer latency. In well-trained animals (Section 3.2), oxiracetam (30 mg/kg, s.c.) attenuated MK-801 (0.15,0. 25 and 0.4 mg/kg, i.p.) induced amnesia for a spatial orientation in the elevated plus-maze. These results show that oxiracetam interacted with the glutamatergic NMDA receptor system and forestalled the impairment of retrieval of long-term memory. The results also justify the usage of the elevated plus-maze method in the evaluation of potential anti-amnesic or nootropic drugs.     

Role of NMDA receptor subtypes in the induction of catalepsy and increase in Fos protein expression after administration of haloperidol

The increase of Fos expression in the striatum induced by haloperidol, an antagonist of the dopamine D2 receptor, might be related to the activation of glutamatergic neurotransmission, especially that of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors. In this study, using behavioral and immunohistochemical techniques, we examined the effects of a noncompetitive NMDA antagonist, (+)-MK-801, and an NMDA receptor NR2B subunit antagonist, ifenprodil, on catalepsy, an extrapyramidal symptom; in this context, we also considered the expression of Fos protein in the forebrain after the administration of haloperidol. Catalepsy in mice, induced by the administration of haloperidol (1 mg/kg), was inhibited by pretreatment with (+)-MK-801 (0.2 mg/kg) or ifenprodil (10 mg/kg). Furthermore, pretreatment with (+)-MK-801 (0.2 mg/kg) significantly attenuated the induction of Fos-immunoreactive (IR) cells in the dorsomedial, dorsolateral, and ventrolateral striatum, but not in the shell region of the nucleus accumbens after the administration of haloperidol, whereas pretreatment with ifenprodil (10 mg/kg) significantly attenuated the induction of Fos-IR cells in all of these areas. It is known that ifenprodil binds sigma receptors and alpha-1 adrenergic receptors with high affinity. Pretreatment with the sigma receptor antagonist BD-1407 (3 mg/kg) or the alpha-1 adrenergic receptor antagonist prazosin (3 mg/kg) affected neither catalepsy nor the expression of Fos-IR cells after the administration of haloperidol. However, pretreatment with CP-101,606 (1 mg/kg), a selective antagonist for the NR2B subunit of the NMDA receptor, significantly attenuated catalepsy and the expression of Fos-IR cells in the forebrain after the administration of haloperidol. These results suggest that the NMDA receptor antagonists attenuated the induction of catalepsy and Fos-IR cells in forebrain after the administration of haloperidol. It was also suggested that haloperidol-induced expression of Fos-IR cells in the shell region of the nucleus accumbens might be differentially regulated by NMDA receptor subunits. Therefore, it appears that selective antagonists for the NR2B subunit of the NMDA receptor (e.g., CP-101,606) might be useful drugs for the treatment of extrapyramidal side effects (EPS) associated with the chronic use of typical antipsychotics such as haloperidol.     

Effects of histamine H3 receptor agonists and antagonists on cognitive performance and scopolamine-induced amnesia

In previous research we found that pre-training administration of histamine H3 receptor agonists such as (R)-alpha-methylhistamine and imetit impaired rat performance in object recognition and a passive avoidance response at the same doses at which they inhibited the release of cortical acetylcholine in vivo. Conversely, in the present study we report that the post-training administration of (R)-alpha-methylhistamine and imetit failed to affect rat performance in object recognition and a passive avoidance response, suggesting that H3 receptor influences the acquisition and not the recall processes. We also investigated the effects of two H3 receptor antagonists, thioperamide and clobenpropit, in the same behavioral tasks. Pre-training administration of thioperamide and clobenpropit failed to exhibit any procognitive effects in normal animals but prevented scopolamine-induced amnesia. However, also post-training administration of thioperamide prevented scopolamine-induced amnesia. Hence, the ameliorating effects of scopolamine-induced amnesia by H3 receptor antagonism are not only mediated by relieving the inhibitory action of cortical H3 receptors, but other mechanisms are also involved. Nevertheless, H3 receptor antagonists may have implications for the treatment of degenerative disorders associated with impaired cholinergic function.     

Adenosine A2A receptor blockade prevents memory dysfunction caused by beta-amyloid peptides but not by scopolamine or MK-801

Adenosine A2A receptor antagonists alleviate memory deficits caused by aging or by administration of beta-amyloid peptides in rodents, which is in accordance with the beneficial effects of caffeine consumption (an adenosine receptor antagonist) on memory performance in aged individuals and in preventing Alzheimer's disease. We now tested if A2A receptor blockade affords a general beneficial effect in different experimental paradigms disturbing memory performance in rodents. The beta-amyloid fragment present in patients with Alzheimer's disease (Abeta1-42, 2 nmol, icv) decreased spontaneous alternation in the Y-maze after 15 days (29%) to an extent similar to the decrease of memory performance caused by scopolamine (2 mg/kg, ip) or MK-801 (0.25 mg/kg, ip) after 30 min (28% and 39%, respectively). The selective A2A receptor antagonist SCH58261 (0.05 mg/kg, ip every 24 h, starting 30 min before the noxious stimuli) prevented Abeta1-42-induced amnesia, but failed to modify scopolamine- or MK-801-induced amnesia. Similar conclusions were reached when testing another A2A receptor antagonist (KW6002, 3 mg/kg, ip). These results indicate that A2A receptors do not affect general processes of memory impairment but instead play a crucial role restricted to neurodegenerative conditions involving an insidious synaptic deterioration leading to memory dysfunction.     

Lack of neuroprotective effect of some sigma ligands in a model of focal cerebral ischemia in the mouse.

The potential neuroprotective effect of seven sigma ligands has been evaluated in a mouse model of focal cerebral ischemia (induced by coagulation of the left middle cerebral artery) and compared to that of known N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists. When given after the induction of cerebral ischemia, the NMDA receptor antagonists dizocilpine and CGS 19755 and the mixed NMDA antagonist/sigma ligand eliprodil (SL 82.0715) afforded very substantial protection against cortical infarction (92, 44 and 72%, at the doses of 1, 10 and 10 mg/kg, i.p., for dizocilpine, CGS 19755 and eliprodil, respectively). In contrast, none of the sigma ligands investigated--DTG, DMTG, GBR 12909, (+)- and (-)-3-PPP (up to 10 mg/kg), BMY 14802 (up to 30 mg/kg), except haloperidol at a high dose (3 mg/kg)--had neuroprotective effects.     

The selective 5-HT(6) receptor antagonist Ro 04-6790 attenuates psychotomimetic effects of the NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801

There are experimental evidences indicating that the non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 impairs cognition and produces a series of schizophrenia-like symptoms in rodents (hypermotility, stereotypies and ataxia). The present study was designed to investigate the efficacy of the selective 5-HT(6) receptor antagonist Ro 04-6790 in counteracting these MK-801-induced behavioural effects in the rat. The effects of Ro 04-6790 in antagonizing MK-801-induced memory deficits were assessed using the object recognition task. The ability of this 5-HT(6) receptor antagonist in counteracting hypermotility, stereotypies and ataxia produced by MK-801 were evaluated in a motor activity cage. Post-training administration of Ro 04-6790 (10 and to some extent also 3mg/kg) antagonized MK-801-induced performance deficits in a recognition memory test. In a subsequent study, Ro 04-6790 (3 and 10 mg/kg) reversed hypermotility and ataxia produced by MK-801. This 5-HT(6) receptor antagonist also alleviated MK-801-induced certain stereotypies. Our findings indicate that Ro 04-6790 attenuates behavioural effects related to the hypofunction of the NMDA receptor suggesting that this compound might be involved in the psychotomimetic effects of non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonists.     

Effects of agonists of NMDA and serotonin receptors at different stages of amnesia caused by impairment of long-term memory reconsolidation

Previously we showed that in snails that were conditioned for food aversion impairment of memory reconsolidation MK-801, an antagonist of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, induced amnesia, at the early stage of which (<10 days) memory was restored after repeated conditioning. In contrast, at the late stages (≥10 days) repeated training did not lead to memory restoration. In the present study, we induced amnesia by MK-801/reminding in snails 24 h after taste aversion conditioning, and then tested the effects of an agonist of NMDA receptors and a serotonin precursor 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) at the early (day 3) and late (day 12) stages of amnesia. We found that NMDA injection and reminding by conditioned food stimulus 3 days after amnesia induction did not lead to memory restoration. However, repeated conditioning 15 days after the amnesia induction led to the restoration of memory. NMDA injection alone, not followed by reexposure, did not influence amnesia development. NMDA injection combined with reminding 12 days after the amnesia induction, as well as 5-HTP injection combined with a reminding 3 days after amnesia induction were ineffective, and a second conditioning did not result in the restoration of the memory. Thus, we have demonstrated that NMDA receptor agonists have an antiamnestic effect only during the early phase of amnesia development, which is caused by memory reconsolidation disruption, whereas the late phase of amnesia is insensitive to the agonists.     

Synergistic improvement effect of nicotine-ghrelin co-injection into the anterior ventral tegmental area on morphine-induced amnesia

In the present study the effect of ghrelin or ghrelin/nicotine injection into the anterior ventral tegmental area (aVTA) on morphine-induced amnesia in passive avoidance learning have been evaluated. Also, the role of the aVTA nicotinic receptors in possible ghrelin-induced effects has been investigated. All animals were bilaterally implanted with chronic cannulas in the aVTA. A step-through type passive avoidance task was used for measurement of memory. We found that post-training subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of morphine (0.5–7.5 mg/kg) dose-dependently reduced the step-through latency, indicating morphine-induced amnesia. Post-training bilateral infusion of ghrelin (0.3, 1.5 and 3 nmol/μl) in a dose-dependent manner reversed amnesia induced by morphine (7.5 mg/kg, s.c.). Furthermore, reversal effect of ghrelin (3 nmol/μl) was blocked by pre-treatment of intra-aVTA administration of mecamylamine (1–3 μg/rat), a nicotinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist. Intra-aVTA administration of the higher dose of mecamylamine (3 μg/rat) into the aVTA by itself decreased the step-through latency and induced amnesia. In addition, post-training intra-aVTA administration of nicotine (0.25, 0.5, 1 μg/rat) which alone cannot affect memory consolidation, decreased significantly the amnesia induced by morphine (7.5 mg/kg, s.c.). Co-treatment of an ineffective dose of ghrelin (0.3 nmol/μl) with an ineffective dose of nicotine (0.25 μg/rat) significantly increased step-through latency of morphine (7.5 mg/kg, s.c.) treated animals, indicating the synergistic effect of the drugs. Taken together, our results suggest that intra-aVTA administration of ghrelin reversed morphine-induced amnesia and that ghrelin interacts synergistically with nicotine to mitigate morphine-induced amnesia.     

Nitric oxide donor molsidomine attenuates psychotomimetic effects of the NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801

There is experimental evidence indicating that the non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 impairs cognition and produces a series of schizophrenia-like symptoms in rodents (hypermotility, stereotypies, and ataxia). The present study was designed to investigate the efficacy of the nitric oxide (NO) donor molsidomine in counteracting these MK-801-induced behavioral effects in the rat. In a first study, post-training administration of molsidomine (at 4 but not 2 mg/kg) successfully antagonized MK-801-induced performance deficits in a recognition memory test. In a subsequent study, molsidomine (2 and 4 mg/kg) was shown to be unable to reverse MK-801-induced hypermotility but attenuated stereotypies (continuous movement whole cage, body sway, and head weaving) produced by MK-801. Moreover, at 4 mg/kg this NO donor counteracted MK-801-induced ataxia. Our findings indicate that molsidomine attenuates behavioral effects related to the hypofunction of the NMDA receptor suggesting that NO might be involved in the psychotomimetic effects of non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonists.     

Could the 5-HT1B receptor inverse agonism affect learning consolidation?

Diverse evidence indicates that, the 5-HT system might play a role in learning and memory, since it occurs in brain areas mediating such processes and 5-HT drugs modulate them. Hence in this work, in order to explore further 5-HT involvement on learning and memory 5-HT1B receptors' role is investigated. Evidence indicates that SB-224289 (a 5-HT1B receptor inverse agonist) post-training injection facilitated learning consolidation in an associative autoshaping learning task, this effect was partially reversed by GR 127935 (a 5-HT1B/1D receptor antagonist), but unaffected by MDL 100907 (a 5-HT2A receptor antagonist) or ketanserin (a 5-HT1D/2A/7 receptor antagonist) at low doses. Moreover, SB-224289 antagonized the learning deficit produced by TFMPP (a 5-HT1A/1B/1D/2A/2C receptor agonist), GR 46611 (a 5-HT1A/1B/1D receptor agonist), mCPP (a 5-HT2A/2C/3/7 receptor agonist/antagonist) or GR 127935 (at low dose). SB-224289 did not alter the 8-OH-DPAT (a 5-HT1A/7 receptor agonist) learning facilitatory effect. SB-224289 eliminated the deficit learning produced by the anticholinergic muscarinic scopolamine or the glutamatergic antagonist dizocilpine. Administration of both, GR 127935 (5mg/kg) plus ketanserin (0.01 mg/kg) did not modify learning consolidation; nevertheless, when ketanserin dose was increased (0.1-1.0mg/kg) and SB-224289 dose was maintained constant, a learning facilitation effect was observed. Notably, SB-224289 at 1.0mg/kg potentiated a subeffective dose of the 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonist/antagonist mixed GR 127935, which facilitated learning consolidation and this effect was abolished by ketanserin at a higher dose. Collectively, the data confirm and extend the earlier findings with GR 127935 and the effects of non-selective 5-HT(1B) receptor agonists. Clearly 5-HT1B agonists induced a learning deficit which can be reversed with SB-224289. Perhaps more importantly, SB-224289 enhances learning consolidation when given alone and can reverse the deficits induced by both cholinergic and glutamatergic antagonist. Hence, 5-HT1B receptor inverse agonists or antagonists could represent drugs for the treatment of learning and memory dysfunctions.     

The role of NMDA and AMPA/Kainate receptors in the consolidation of catalepsy sensitization

Daily injection of the dopamine D(2) receptor antagonist haloperidol is associated with the development of catalepsy sensitization in rats, which leads to a day to day increase of rigor and akinesia. The process of catalepsy sensitization incorporates different learning stages. Here we investigated the mechanisms underlying the consolidation of catalepsy sensitization. In particular, we asked whether NMDA- and non-NMDA (AMPA- and Kainate) receptors play a role in the consolidation of catalepsy sensitization. Accordingly, rats received post-training injections of the NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 (single injection of either 0.1mg/kg or 0.25mg/kg; or a double injection of 0.1mg/kg immediately and 30 min after test cessation) or of the AMPA/Kainate receptor antagonist GYKI 52466 (single injection of 5mg/kg). Our results showed that the consolidation of catalepsy sensitization was decelerated by both glutamatergic AMPA/Kainate- and NMDA-receptor antagonists. With the higher MK-801 dosage, the deceleration was stronger, suggesting a dose dependent mechanism. We hence affirmed a role for the ionotropic glutamate receptors in the consolidation process of catalepsy sensitization.     

Involvement of mGlu5 and NMDA receptors in the antidepressant-like effect of acamprosate in the tail suspension test

Accumulating evidence supports the hypothesis that modulation of glutamatergic system via NMDA receptors and mGlu5 receptors might be an effective antidepressant therapy. However, clinical application of NMDA and mGlu5 antagonists in the therapy of depression is still an open question. In the present study we investigated potential antidepressant-like effect of a functional NMDA and mGlu5 receptor antagonist, acamprosate, which has been used in the therapy of human alcoholics as an anti-craving drug for more than 20 years and is considered as a safe substance. We have found potential antidepressant-like effect of acamprosate at doses of 100-400 mg/kg in the TST in C57BL/6J mice. Furthermore we have shown that the antidepressant-like effect of acamprosate used at a dose of 200 mg/kg was dependent on NMDA and mGlu5 receptor blockade, since NMDA (25 mg/kg) and mGlu5 receptor positive allosteric modulator, CDPPB (3 mg/kg), antagonized its activity in the TST. These data suggest that acamprosate may induce antidepressant-like effect and that NMDA and mGlu5 receptors are crucial targets of acamprosate in this action.     

NMDA receptor regulation of memory and behavior in humans.

N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor hypofunction is associated with a range of effects on cognition and behavior in whole animal and human studies. NMDA receptor hypofunction within the brain, which can be induced experimentally in vivo using NMDA receptor antagonist drugs, produces adverse effects on memory function. The results suggest that NMDA receptor hypofunction can preferentially affect neural mechanisms regulating the efficiency of encoding and consolidation into longer-term storage. More pronounced NMDA receptor hypofunction can produce a clinical syndrome that includes core features of psychosis, as well as dissociation. Finally, sustained and severe underexcitation of NMDA receptors in the adult brain is associated with a neurotoxic process with well-characterized neuropathological features. Progressive increases in severity of NMDA receptor hypofunction within the brain can produce a range of effects on brain function, involving local and distributed circuitry, which may underlie the observed changes in behavior. As the brain ages, the NMDA receptor system becomes progressively hypofunctional, potentially contributing to further age-related decreases in memory and learning performance. Pharmacological and genomic methods for preventing NMDA receptor hypofunction, or for preventing the upstream or downstream consequences modeled by treatment with NMDA antagonists, may be applicable to the prevention and treatment of memory and behavioral dysfunction in a variety of neuropsychiatric disease conditions.     

Protective effect of LY379268, a selective group II metabotropic glutamate receptor agonist, on dizocilpine-induced neuropathological changes in rat retrosplenial cortex

In the present study, we examined the effects of LY379268, the group II metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR) agonist, on the neuropathological changes in the rat retrosplenial cortex induced by noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist dizocilpine ((+)-MK-801). Administration of LY379268 (1, 3, 10 mg/kg, i.p.) reduced dizocilpine (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.)-induced neuropathological changes in the retrosplenial cortex, in a dose-dependent manner. Co-administration of LY379268 (10 mg/kg, i.p.) with group II mGluR antagonist LY341495 (5 mg/kg, i.p.) blocked the effects of LY379268. Furthermore, LY379268 (10 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly reduced the expression of heat shock protein HSP-70, a marker of reversible neuronal injury, in the rat retrosplenial cortex after administration of dizocilpine (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.). Moreover, pretreatment with LY379268 (10 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly suppressed the increase in extracellular acetylcholine (ACh) levels in the retrosplenial cortex induced by administration of dizocilpine (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.). These results suggest that LY379268 has a protective effect on the neurotoxicity in the rat retrosplenial cortex after administration of NMDA receptor antagonists such as dizocilpine.     

Subchronic phencyclidine administration alters central vasopressin receptor binding and social interaction in the rat

Arginine vasopressin (AVP) is a peptide involved in social behaviors in rodents. To investigate the mechanism underlying the deficits in social behavior induced by blockade of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, this study examined the effect of noncompetitive NMDA antagonists on AVP receptor binding and social interaction in the rat. Subchronic phencyclidine (PCP) administration (2 mg/kg/day, 14 days, i.p.) significantly reduced the density of V1a receptor binding sites, labeled by an [125I]-Linear AVP antagonist, in several brain regions. Subchronic treatment with PCP or MK-801 (0.13 mg/kg/day, 14 days, i.p.) impaired social interactions in rats, as has been previously reported. These results suggest that NMDA antagonists have modulatory effects on the central vasopressinergic system and social interaction.     

The effects of the 5-HT(6) receptor agonist EMD and the 5-HT(7) receptor agonist AS19 on memory formation

Growing evidence indicates that 5-hydrohytryptamine (5-HT) receptors mediate learning and memory. Particularly interesting are 5-HT(6) and 5-HT(7) receptors, which are localized in brain areas involved in memory formation. Interestingly, recently selective 5-HT(6) and 5-HT(7) receptor agonists and antagonists have become available. Previous evidence indicates that 5-HT(6) or 5-HT(7) receptors antagonists had no effects, improved memory formation and/or reversed amnesia. Herein, the effects of EMD (a 5-HT(6) receptor agonist) and AS19 (a 5-HT(7) receptor agonist) in the associative learning task of autoshaping were studied. Post-training systemic administration of EMD (1-10 mg/kg) or AS19 (1-10 mg/kg) were tested in short-term memory (STM) and long-term memory (LTM). Results showed that only EMD 5.0mg/kg impaired both STM and LTM. AS19 at 1-10 mg/kg significantly impaired STM but not LTM. In those groups used to test only LTM, EMD impaired it; while AS19 improved LTM. Moreover, in the interaction experiments, the STM EMD-impairment effect was partially reversed by the selective 5-HT(6) receptor antagonist SB-399885 (10 mg/kg). The STM AS19-impairment effect (5.0 mg/kg) was not altered by the selective 5-HT(1A) antagonist WAY 100635 (0.3 mg/kg) but reversed by the selective 5-HT(7) receptor antagonist SB-269970 (10.0 mg/kg). The AS19-SB-269970 combination impaired LTM. Taken together these data suggest that the stimulation of 5-HT(6) impaired both STM and LTM. 5-HT(7) receptors stimulation impaired STM but improved LTM. And these results are discussed in the context of their possible neural bases.