腹腔镜辅助下小切口巨大腹壁疝修补术

目的 探讨腹腔镜辅助下小切口巨大腹壁疝修补术的经验和体会.方法 分析2009年1月至2009年9月收治的18例采用腹腔镜辅助下小切口修补巨大腹壁疝的患者资料,观察手术时间、隐匿疝、小切口长度、浆液肿、住院时间、慢性疼痛、复发等情况.结果 18例患者均顺利完成手术,手术时间(129 ±19)min,切口长度(5.6 ±1.0)cm,发现隐匿疝3例,术后发生浆液肿1例,术后住院时间(5.1±1.2)d,术后疼痛持续大于3个月的1例,无切口感染和肠道及腹腔脏器损伤,无手术死亡.全组患者随访时间(8.6±1.6)个月无复发.结论 腹腔镜辅助下小切口修补巨大腹壁疝是一种安全可靠的手术方法,有效减少了术后并发症的发生,达到了腹壁塑形的效果.     

腹腔镜辅助下小切口巨大腹壁疝修补术

Objective To sum up the experience of performing a laparoscope-assisted hemiorrhaphy for huge ventral hernia through small incision.Methods Clinical data were retrospectively analyzed for 18 cases of huge ventral hernia admitted from Jan 2009 to Sept 2009 undergoing laparoscope- assisted hernia mpair through small incision.Data renewed including the operational duration,missed hernia,length of the incision,serumal cyst,the length of hospital stay,chronic pain and the recidivation.Results Surgery was successful in all of the 18 cases,the operational time was(129±19) main,the length of the incision was(5.6±1.0) cm.Missed hemia were identified in 3 cases during the operation.One case:suffered from postoperative serumal cyst,the postoperative length of hospital stay was(5.1±1.2) days,postoperative incisional pain lasting for more than 3 months was identified in 1 case,there was no incisional infection and nor injury to intraabdominal organs,there was no operative mortahty,all the cases were followed-up for(8.6 ±1.6)months and there was no recidivation.Conclusions The laparoscope hemia repair with the subsidiary of micro-incision is effective and safe,and it reshapes the abdominal wall.     

腹腔镜下腹壁切口疝修补术

目的探讨腹腔镜下应用补片行腹壁切口疝修补术的方法、安全性及临床效果。方法2004年9月至2007年6月对56例切口疝（腹壁缺损长径7～19cm,宽径4～12cm）的患者行腹腔镜下应用补片行切口疝修补术。结果55例腹腔镜下行腹腔粘连松解和补片固定,顺利完成切口疝修补手术,1例因肠管与腹壁粘连紧密而中转开腹修补术。手术时间60～135min,平均92min。肠功能恢复早,术后排便、排气时间平均为31h,术后住院5～7d。术后并发症：术后疼痛达3个月以上者有9例,浆液肿8例。无手术死亡和肠瘘发生。随访16～28个月,平均19个月,未见切口疝复发。结论腹腔镜下行腹腔内粘连松解、采用缝合器和缝线贯穿腹壁固定补片来修补腹壁切口疝是一种安全、有效的微创方法,值得临床推广应用。     

腹腔镜下腹壁切口疝修补要点

腹壁切口疝是腹部外科手术后常见并发症,其发生率为2%～11%,且不能自愈,需手术治疗.单纯直接缝合修补的复发率可高达50%左右,巨大切口疝修补更是外科治疗的难点[1,2].     

小切口辅助腹腔镜巨大腹壁切口疝修补术的探讨

目的总结小切口辅助腹腔镜巨大切口疝修补术的经验。方法 2008年6月-2009年12月,采用小切口辅助腹腔镜修补巨大切口疝15例,疝环（12.3±3.4）cm,采用小切口切除疝囊并进行腹壁塑形。结果 15例均顺利完成手术,手术时间100-150 min,（123.3±15.9）min。小切口长度5-8 cm,（6.0±0.9）cm。术中发现隐匿疝6例,一并予以修补。浆液肿1例。术后住院时间4-8 d,（5.3±1.2）d。1例术后疼痛持续〉3个月,无切口感染和肠道及腹腔脏器损伤。全组随访12-30个月,（19.9±4.7）月,无复发。结论小切口辅助腹腔镜修补巨大切口疝是一种安全可靠的手术方法,术后并发症少,达到了腹壁塑形的效果。     

腹腔镜下腹壁巨大切口疝修补术的临床分析

目的 探讨腹腔镜下应用补片修补腹壁切口疝的手术方法及临床效果.方法 回顾性分析41例腹壁切口疝行腹腔镜下补片修补术患者的临床资料.结果 38例均顺利完成手术, 3例中转开腹.手术时间 78～186 min,平均 95 min.术后疼痛轻微,术后排便、排气时间 25～41 h,平均 32 h.术后第 2 d进食.术后住院 5～7 d,平均 6 d.41例随访 6～16个月,平均 9个月,未见疝复发.结论 腹腔镜下采用复合补片修补腹壁切口疝是一种安全、有效的方法,值得临床推广应用.     

腹腔镜下腹壁巨大切口疝修补术的临床应用

目的探讨腹腔镜下应用补片修补巨大腹壁切口疝的手术方法及临床效果。方法分析25例应用腹腔镜下补片修补腹壁巨大切口疝(腹壁缺损长径为12~25cm,宽9~18cm,缺损面积108~451cm2)患者的临床资料。结果21例(84.0%)顺利完成腹腔镜下腹壁切口疝修补术,4例(16.0%)因肠管与腹壁粘连紧密而中转开腹。手术时间78~186(平均95)min。术后住院5~8d,平均6.5d。术后疼痛达3个月以上8例(32.0%),经治疗后缓解;浆液肿9例(36%)。无切口感染和肠瘘发生;无手术死亡。全组患者随访6~25(平均11)个月,无切口疝复发。结论腹腔镜下修补腹壁巨大切口疝是一种安全、有效的方法,对腹腔粘连重分离困难者应及时中转开腹。     

老年腹壁切口疝的腹腔镜下修补术

目的 探讨腹腔镜下应用补片行老年腹壁切口疝修补术的方法、安全性及临床效果。方法 2004年11月至2006年6月对17例老年切口疝患者行腹腔镜下应用补片切口疝修补术。结果 16例腹腔镜下行腹腔粘连松解和补片固定,顺利完成切口疝修补手术,1例因肠管与腹壁粘连紧密而中转开腹修补术。手术时间65～132min,平均95min。术后恢复排便、排气时间平均为31h,术后住院5～7d。术后并发症：疼痛3个月以上者3例,浆液肿5例,穿刺口感染1例,均经保守治疗后好转,无手术死亡和肠瘘发生。随访7～26个月（平均13个月）,未见切口疝复发。结论 腹腔镜下行腹腔内粘连松解,采用缝合器和缝线贯穿腹壁固定补片修补老年腹壁切口疝安全、有效。     

腹腔镜腹壁切口疝修补术18例体会

目的探讨腹腔镜腹壁切口疝补片修补术的临床应用价值及安全性。方法回顾分析2007年9月至2009年3月18例大或巨大腹壁切口疝患者采用腹腔镜手术治疗的临床资料。结果18例手术均在腹腔镜下完成,其中1例术中因广泛致密黏连,做小切口直视下分离黏连回纳疝内容物后缝合切口腹腔镜下完成后续操作,手术时间45—90min,平均60min;术后4—48h患者下床活动,1—2天排气,术后疼痛轻,3—6天后大部分患者疼痛明显缓解,术后住院3～14天,平均5天,术后随访2～20个月,1例诉慢性疼痛,1例术后1个月出现补片感染,后经开腹取出补片膨体聚四氟乙烯面,随访5个月未见疝复发。结论腹腔镜治疗腹壁切口疝相对于开放修补方法具有微创、恢复快、并发症少等优点,是一种安全可靠的手术方法。     

单孔腹腔镜腹壁切口疝无张力修补术

目的 探讨应用单孔腹腔镜器械行腹壁切口疝无张力疝修补的可行性及治疗效果.方法 对1例二次腹部术后出现腹壁切口疝的女性病人,应用单孔腹腔镜器械行无张力疝修补.患者取仰卧位,全身麻醉,于左腋前线平脐平面建立长约2.5 cm横行切口,放置Tri-port,电刀分离粘连,将补片通过Tri-port放入腹腔,通过钩针及螺旋钉枪(Protack)将补片固定在腹壁上. 结果 手术时间90 min,术中出血量＜10ml,术后住院时间7d.术后1月复查切口愈合好,疝无复发. 结论 应用单孔腹腔镜器械行腹壁切口疝无张力疝修补安全可行,手术时间与传统腹腔镜时间无明显差别,但其更具微创美容效果.     

Laparoscopic preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair without peritoneal incision

Summary More than 500,000 hernia procedures are performed annually in the United States alone. The authors have devised a new technique for laparoscopic hernia repair. The peritoneum is not incised, as the space between the abdominal wall and the peritoneum is developed with CO₂ and blunt dissection. The trocars and laparoscope are placed within this preperitoneal space. Mesh is stapled to Cooper's ligament and the underside of the abdominal wall. From November 1990 to January 1992, 68 herniae have been repaired in 35 patients. The first 25 patients were kept overnight for observation and discharged the following day. Thirty-two patients (92%) were able to resume full physical activity within 1 week. Average follow-up was only 12 months, but there were no recurrent or retained herniae.     

Evaluation of new prosthetic meshes for ventral hernia repair

Background In hernia repair, particularly laparoscopic hernia repair, direct contact between mesh and abdominal organs cannot always be avoided. Several mesh materials and composite meshes have been developed to decrease subsequent adhesion formation. Recently, new meshes have been introduced. In an experimental rat study, their value was established and compared with that of meshes already available on the market. Methods In 200 rats, eight different meshes were placed intraperitoneally and in direct contact with abdominal viscera. The following meshes were tested: polypropylene (Prolene), e-PTFE (Dualmesh), polypropylene– polyglecaprone composite (Ultrapro), titanium–polypropylene composite (Timesh), polypropylene with carboxymethylcellulose–sodium hyaluronate coating (Sepramesh), polyester with collagen-polyethylene glycol–glycerol coating (Parietex Composite), polypropylene–polydioxanone composite with oxidized cellulose coating (Proceed), and bovine pericardium (Tutomesh). At 7 and then at 30 days postoperatively, adhesion formation, mesh incorporation, tensile strength, shrinkage, and infection were scored by two independent observers. Results Parietex Composite, Sepramesh, and Tutomesh resulted in decreased surface coverage with adhesions, whereas Prolene, Dualmesh, Ultrapro, Timesh, and Proceed resulted in increased adhesion coverage. Parietex Composite, Prolene, Ultrapro, and Sepramesh resulted in the most mesh incorporation. Dualmesh and Tutomesh resulted in significantly increased shrinkage. There were no differences in mesh infection. Parietex Composite and Dualmesh resulted in a moderate inflammatory reaction, as compared with the mild reaction the other meshes exhibited. Conclusion Parietex Composite and Sepramesh combine minimal adhesion formation with maximum mesh incorporation and tensile strength. The authors recommend the use of these meshes for hernia repair in which direct contact with the abdominal viscera cannot be avoided.     

腹腔镜下腹壁切口疝修补术20例

目的 探讨腹腔镜治疗腹壁切口疝的安全性及有效性.方法 回顾性分析2009年6月至2011年9月20例腹壁切口疝患者的资料.其中男14例,女6例,年龄26 ～ 76岁,平均57.3岁.距离上次手术时间间隔为4～26个月,平均7个月.腹正中切口13例,侧腹部切口7例.有2例为缝合修补术后复发病例.结果 所有患者均采用复合补片进行修补,腹壁缺损大小4cmx5cm～ 10cm×13 cm.手术时间40～ 170 min,平均100 min.术后所有患者切口Ⅰ期愈合,术后补片上方疝囊内积液5例,经局部穿刺抽吸并加压包扎后治愈.术后修补区域腹壁疼痛1例,给予口服美洛昔康片对症处理,于术后3个月内逐渐消失.术后住院时间4～13d,平均7d.18例患者获得随访,随访6～30个月,平均15个月,1例复发.结论 腹腔镜下复合补片修补腹壁切口疝具有损伤小、术后疼痛轻、并发症少、恢复快等优点,值得推广.     

比较腹腔镜腹腔内与开放腹膜前间隙补片置入术治疗腹壁切口疝的效果

目的比较腹腔镜腹腔内补片置入术(IPOM)与开放腹膜前间隙补片置入术(Sublay)治疗腹壁切口疝的效果。方法选取2016-01—2019-01间在郑州大学第一附属医院接受疝修补术治疗的76例腹壁切口疝患者,将36例行腹腔镜IPOM术的患者作为腔镜组。将40例行开放Sublay术的患者作为开放组。回顾性分析患者的临床资料。结果2组患者均成功完成手术。2组手术时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。腔镜组术中出血量、术后肠蠕动恢复时间及住院时间均少于开放组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。腔镜组术后近期疼痛发生率低于开放组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),其余并发症差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论腹腔镜IPOM术具有创伤小、恢复快、疼痛轻、出血少、并发症少等优点,具有更广阔的应用前景。     

下腹正中切口开放式腹膜前修补术治疗腹股沟复发疝的临床研究

目的 探讨下腹正中切口开放式腹膜前修补术治疗腹股沟复发疝的安全性及有效性.方法 回顾性分析200r7年1月至2010年1月腹股沟复发疝患者48例临床资料,其中行下腹正中切口开放式腹膜前修补术(实验组)28例,前入路修补术(对照组)20例.对阴囊血肿、缺血性睾丸炎、平均手术时间、术后疼痛、异物感、复发进行研究.结果 经统计学分析,二组在平均手术时间、术后复发率、阴囊血肿等方面差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),在缺血性睾丸炎、术后疼痛、异物感方面差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 开放式腹膜前修补术治疗腹股沟复发疝可明显减少各种并发症和术后不适的发生率,疗效肯定,值得临床推广应用.     

腹腔内放置复合补片原位修补巨大造口旁疝八例

目的总结应用复合补片腹腔内修补巨大造口旁疝的经验。方法回顾性分析复合补片经腹腔内修补巨大造口旁疝8例的临床资料,其中男性6例,女性2例,年龄46～63岁,平均54.7岁。患者均因直肠癌行Miles手术后发生造口旁疝,疝病史3～8年,其中复发性造口旁疝2例。疝环最大径11～15 cm,平均12.6 cm。根据疝环大小选择合适补片,补片边缘均超出疝环缘3 cm以上。在补片中心剪-3 cm直径的孔,并在孔的一侧剪开补片,将补片中心孔套入造口肠管,补片其他部分覆盖住腹壁缺损,补片聚四氟乙烯面朝向腹腔,聚丙烯面朝向腹壁。用2-0的Prolene线连续缝合补片被剪开的一侧裂口,并将补片中心孔的聚四氟乙烯材料缘与造口肠管用3-0的可吸收线间断缝合固定4～5针。然后用1-0的Prolene线经全腹壁穿刺缝合方式,将补片铺平并固定于腹壁,间隔距离5 mm。多余皮肤行适当整形。结果手术时间97～146min,平均109 min。伤口均一期愈合,1例发生浆液肿,2例发生术后近期修补区刺痛。随访3～27个月,平均20个月,无复发。结论复合补片经腹腔内修补巨大造口旁疝是一种安全有效的方法。     

A novel approach to extraction of incarcerated omentum and mesh insertion in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair

During laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR), it is not always possible to reduce incarcerated omentum through a tight defect and it may tear or require transection within the abdomen. This leaves an ischemic mass of tissue within the hernia sac which can cause pain, infection, or the appearance of hernia recurrence postoperatively. We describe a technique which allows extraction of any retained omentum within the hernia sac, mesh insertion, and laparoscopic completion of the procedure using only 5 mm trocars. After obtaining access to the abdomen with a 5 mm optical trocar in select patients, lysis of adhesions is performed as needed. When incarcerated omentum that cannot be safely reduced is discovered, it is transected at the level of the abdominal wall using electrocoagulation or ultrasonic dissection. At this point, we make a 2–3 cm skin incision overlying the retained omentum, open the hernia sac, and remove the amputated omentum. The rolled up piece of mesh utilized for the repair is then inserted through this opening. The hernia sac is closed with absorbable suture, allowing reinsufflation of the abdomen and completion of the laparoscopic repair. This method enables us to safely remove any retained omentum from the hernia sac and utilize the same incision for mesh insertion. We utilize only 5 mm trocars without the need for a larger port through which to place the mesh into the abdomen. This reduces the risk of postoperative trocar site hernias as the opening for mesh insertion is covered by the mesh after it is fixed in place. This technique may also decrease the need for conversion to open hernia repair by allowing an alternative approach to reduce incarcerated omentum.