Clinical implications of the transversus abdominis plane block in pediatric anesthesia

Optimal perioperative analgesia for infants and children after major abdominal surgery poses a challenge when central neuraxial techniques are contraindicated. As a regional anesthesia technique, the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block has been shown to reduce opioid consumption and improve pain scores compared to traditional perioperative pain strategies. Accordingly, TAP blocks may be considered as an alternative to central neuraxial analgesia to optimize perioperative pain control. Advancements in ultrasound technology have further improved the reliability and safety profile of this technique. Despite growing recognition of the diverse clinical scenarios where TAP blocks may be of benefit, its use among pediatric anesthesiologists remains limited. This article describes the history, anatomy, and a review of the current literature on TAP blocks with an emphasis on outcomes in pediatric patients.     

TAP block and blocks of the abdominal wall

Since the revolution of ultrasound in regional anesthesia, new techniques have arisen. The “transversus abdominis plane” block or TAP block is one of them. The benefits of a TAP block for postoperative analgesia have been shown mostly after laparotomy. Because this block seems to be technically easy, many anesthesiologists have quickly adopted it. However, the TAP block presents some technical specificities and knowledge of the anatomy is required. This article reviews the anatomy of the abdominal wall, the different blocks, the indications, the complications, and highlights the many unanswered questions left. This review proposes a new vision of the abdominal wall blocks based on a new understanding of the anatomy of the abdominal wall associated with an ultrasound technique.     

Children with spinal dysraphism: transversus abdominis plane (TAP) catheters to the rescue!

Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block catheters may offer an alternative to a central neuraxial blockade for patients undergoing major abdominal surgery (Paediatr Anaesth 19: 2009; 296). This case series consists of two children with spinal dysraphism in whom bilateral TAP block catheters were placed for postoperative pain relief. Administration of low dose, low concentration local anesthetic provided both children with excellent postoperative analgesia.     

Ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane block versus local wound infiltration in children undergoing appendectomy: A randomized controlled trial

BackgroundThe transversus abdominis plane block (TAP) has been described for pain management following abdominal surgery in adults, but there are only few reports on its use in pediatrics. The aim of this study was to evaluate the analgesic effect of ultrasound guided TAP block in patients scheduled for open appendectomy versus an active comparator (wound infiltration).MethodsForty-four children aged 4–16 years (ASA 1–2) were enrolled. Patients were randomized into two groups (22 in each). Patients in group (T) were assigned to receive ultrasound guided TAP block using 0.4 ml/kg of bupivacaine 0.25%, and those in group (L) were assigned to receive local infiltration by the surgeon. Maximum pain scores, the time to the first analgesic requirement and the number of analgesic requirements were recorded over 48 h.ResultsThe ultrasound guided TAP block increased the mean time to the first analgesic requirement (10.4 ± 1.5 h) in comparison with the local infiltration group (5.4 ± 1.5). The cumulative number of doses of analgesic was significantly lower in TAP group than in local infiltration group (3.7 ± 1.1 versus 5.3 ± 2.1) and the Pain Scale score was significantly lower in the TAP group over the study period. Besides, there were no complications attributable to the ultrasound guided TAP block.ConclusionUltrasound-guided TAP block with (0.4 ml/kg) 0.25% bupivacaine provides prolonged postoperative analgesia and reduced analgesic use without any clinical side-effects after appendectomy in children.     

Postoperative continuous transversus abdominis plane block vs continuous wound infusion of levobupivacaine in females undergoing open gynecologic procedures

IntroductionTransversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is used as a part of multimodal analgesia in decreasing pain of lower abdominal wall incision. Local anesthetic instillation of wounds through subcutaneous or subfascial catheters is used to treat postoperative pain in different types of surgery. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to study the opioid-sparing effect of these two techniques (if any) compared to placebo in women undergoing gynecologic procedures through transverse lower abdominal incisions.MethodsSeventy-eight ASA I–III patients planned to undergo gynecologic procedures through a transverse lower abdominal incision were randomly divided into three equal groups: Control (C) group (n = 26), Continuous Wound Infusion (CWI) group (n = 26), and continuous transversus abdominis plane block (TAP) group (n = 26). After standardized general anesthetic and before extubation, the patients were given the allocated treatment. A morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) was started postoperatively alongside with the local anesthetic (or placebo) infusion. Cumulative dose of morphine PCA in the first postoperative 48 h was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included visual analog pain score (VAS) at rest and on movement and complications of morphine PCA.ResultsThe cumulative dose of morphine PCA in the first postoperative 48 h was higher in control group than in groups CWI and TAP (P < 0.001). However, no significant difference was found between groups CWI and TAP. No significant differences were found among the three groups regarding VAS during rest but TAP group showed less pain scores than groups C and CWI on movement. The three groups were similar regarding morphine side effects.ConclusionContinuous bilateral TAP block and CWI can decrease PCA morphine consumption in the first postoperative 48 h when compared to placebo in women undergoing gynecologic surgery through transverse lower abdominal incision. Continuous TAB block might give better analgesia with movement than CWI.     

TAP block analgesia after iliac bone surgery

We report two cases of iliac bone surgery (repair of a symphysis disjunction and fixation of a fracture of the iliac ala) where TAP blocks were effective for postoperative analgesia. In the first case, we performed a bilateral block, and only a unilateral block in the second case. We discuss possible mechanisms to explain the efficacy of the TAP blocks in such surgeries. As for the femoral nerve block in major knee surgery, we think that blocking the parietal pain from skin and blocking parietal muscles contracture, can reduce postoperative pain in such surgeries.     

Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block: a useful adjunct in the management of postoperative respiratory failure

The ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a useful tool in controlling postoperative pain following abdominal surgery. The bilateral ultrasound-guided TAP blocks successfully managed the pain of a patient presenting with hypoxemia and respiratory failure in the Post-anesthesia Care Unit, following a laparotomy for small bowel obstruction during general anesthesia. The TAP block reduced systemic opioid requirements and opioid-induced sedation and respiratory depression, improved patient compliance with non-invasive positive pressure ventilation, and prevented the need for intubation and ventilation in the intensive care unit.     

Transversus abdominis plane blocks for rescue analgesia following Cesarean delivery: a case series

Purpose

The role of routine transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks at the time of surgery for Cesarean delivery analgesia is uncertain. Previous studies have shown no additional analgesic benefit in patients receiving intrathecal morphine. We present a series of three cases where TAP blocks were used for rescue analgesia in patients who had severe post-Cesarean delivery pain after a standard spinal anesthetic containing bupivacaine 12 mg, fentanyl 10 μg, and morphine 200 μg.

Clinical features

All three women experienced severe incisional pain in the postanesthetic care unit (PACU) after offset of spinal anesthesia. When the pain did not subside with intravenous opioids, the women were offered either additional intravenous opioids or a TAP block. They chose the latter. Bilateral TAP blocks were performed in a sterile posterior approach under ultrasound guidance with 0.375% ropivacaine 20 mL with epinephrine 1:400,000. All three patients experienced significant pain relief that lasted 10-19 hr and allowed for a timely discharge from the PACU.

Conclusion

These cases show that TAP blocks may play a valuable role as a rescue analgesic technique rather than as a routine preemptive block for all Cesarean delivery patients. Use of TAP blocks reduced the need for escalating intravenous opioid doses and potential maternal opioid-related side effects. Rescue TAP blocks should be considered after Cesarean delivery when intrathecal morphine does not provide adequate pain relief or for early breakthrough pain after offset of spinal anesthesia.     

Efficacy of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in pain management after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG): A double-blind randomized controlled trial

Background

The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to assess the effectiveness of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in post-operative pain management in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).

腹横肌平面阻滞和骶管阻滞用于患儿先天性巨结肠术后镇痛的比较

目的比较腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞和骶管阻滞对先天性巨结肠根治术患儿术后疼痛的影响。方法选择行先天性巨结肠根治术患儿60例,男52例,女8例,年龄1~3岁,ASAⅠ或Ⅱ级,随机分为腹横肌平面阻滞组(TAP组)和骶管阻滞组(CA组),每组30例。两组患儿均使用0.2%罗哌卡因1ml/kg进行TAP阻滞或骶管阻滞。记录术后6、12、18、24h的FLACC评分、每6小时内舒芬太尼的消耗量、拔除导尿管时间、第一次肛门排气时间以及术后24h内恶心呕吐的发生情况。结果术后6hCA组舒芬太尼消耗量明显少于TAP组,FLACC评分明显低于TAP组(P0.05);术后12、18、24h两组患儿舒芬太尼消耗量和FLACC评分差异无统计学意义。TAP组拔除导尿管时间和肛门排气时间明显短于CA组(P0.05)。两组患儿术后恶心呕吐发生率差异无统计学意义。结论 TAP阻滞和骶管阻滞均能为先天性巨结肠患儿提供良好的术后镇痛,骶管阻滞的早期镇痛效果优于TAP阻滞,而TAP阻滞对术后肠道功能恢复更有利。     

Ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane block in pediatric patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery

ObjectiveTo assess safety and effectiveness of ultrasound-guided TAP block in children undergoing laparoscopic surgery for undescended testis.Subjects and methodsThis randomized controlled trial involved 108 children, 3–7 years old, randomly allocated into one of two equal groups; TAP Group and Control Group. All children received general anesthesia using propofol 1.5–2.5 mg/kg, atracurium 0.5 mg/kg and fentanyl 2 μg/kg. TAP Group received 0.5 ml/kg of ropivacaine 0.375% bilaterally under ultrasound guidance and control group received regular analgesics. Quality of analgesia was assessed using Children’s Hospital Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS) and Objective behavioral pain score (OPS). The primary outcome measures were hemodynamic parameters and degree of pain. Secondary outcome measures were intraoperative fentanyl requirement, postoperative rescue analgesia (time and dose), complications, hospital stay and degree of satisfaction of patients and their parents.ResultsTAP block group had significantly lower intraoperative fentanyl dose (p < 0.001), significantly longer time to first postoperative request of analgesic (p < 0.001), lower analgesic dose during the first postoperative 24 h (p < 0.001) and lower pain scores along the whole 24 postoperative hours. Mean arterial pressure and heart rate were within the clinically accepted range in the two groups. Parents’ satisfaction was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in the TAP block group.ConclusionTAP block under ultrasound guidance was easy, safe, reliable and effective analgesic in children undergoing laparoscopic surgery for undescended testis.     

Efficacy of a TAP block versus an anterior QLB for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: A randomised controlled trial

Background

Both the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and the anterior quadratus lumborum block (QLB) have been shown effective in reducing postoperative pain after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Our hypothesis was that there is no difference in analgesic effect between the two blocks for this procedure.

Methods

In this prospective, double-blind, randomised controlled study, 60 adult patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair were equally randomly assigned to either a preoperative TAP block or an anterior QLB. The primary outcome was oral morphine equivalent (OME) consumption at 4 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were OME consumption at 24, 48 h and 7 days, pain scores at rest and when coughing, nausea, and level of sedation measured at 1, 2, 3, 24, and 48 h and 7 days postoperatively.

Results

Fifty-three patients completed the study. There was no significant difference in OME consumption at 4 h postoperatively, TAP group (10.3 ± 7.85 mg) (mean ± SD) versus the anterior QLB group (10.9 ± 10.85 mg) (p = .713). The pain scores were similar at rest and when coughing during the 7 day observation period, as were the level of sedation and incidence of nausea. There were no cases of serious side-effects or muscle weakness of the thigh on the same side as the block.

Conclusion

There is no difference in OME consumption, pain, nausea or sedation between the TAP and the anterior QLB. Thus, the choice between the two blocks in a clinical setting of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair should be based on other aspects, such as skills, practicalities, and potential risks.     

Feasibility of combined paravertebral block and subcostal transversus abdominis plane block in postoperative pain control after minimally invasive esophagectomy

ObjectivesSubcostal transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and paravertebral block (PVB) offer postoperative analgesia for laparoscopic and thoracoscopic surgery, respectively. We investigated the early postoperative analgesic effects of PVB in combination with subcostal TAP block in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer.MethodsSeventeen patients undergoing MIE without nerve block for postoperative analgesia and 16 patients undergoing MIE with PVB and subcostal TAP block for postoperative analgesia were enrolled for the study. The surgeon performed PVB with bupivacaine at T4, T6, and T8 levels under video-assisted thoracoscopy at the end of the thoracoscopic stage. The anesthesiologist responsible for the anesthesia performed ultrasound-guided bilateral subcostal TAP with bupivacaine at the end of the surgery. Postoperative morphine consumption, pain severity, vital capacity, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and complication rate were compared between groups.ResultsThe group receiving nerve blocks consumed less morphine on postoperative Day 0 (p = 0.016), experienced lower levels of pain at postoperative 0 hour (p = 0.005) and 2 hours (p = 0.049), and had a shorter ICU stay (p = 0.02). No between-group differences in postoperative vital capacity and respiratory complications were observed.ConclusionPVB in combination with subcostal TAP block could reduce morphine consumption and pain severity in the early postoperative period but did not offer other clinical benefits in MIE.     

A randomised controlled trial of the efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in laparoscopic colorectal surgery

Background

Optimal analgesia following laparoscopic colorectal resection is yet to be determined; however, recent studies have questioned the role of postoperative epidural anaesthesia, suggesting other analgesic modalities may be preferable. The aim of this randomised controlled trial was to assess the effect of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks on opioid requirements in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection.

Methods

After appropriate trial registration (www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT 00830089) and local medical ethics review board approval (REC 09/H0407/10), all adult patients who were to undergo laparoscopic colorectal surgery at a single centre were randomised into the intervention group receiving bilateral TAP blocks or the control group (no TAP block). The blocks were administered prior to surgery after the induction of a standardised anaesthetic by an anaesthetist otherwise uninvolved with the case. The patient, theatre anaesthetist, surgeon, and ward staff were blinded to treatment allocation. All patients received postoperative analgesia of paracetamol and morphine as a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Cumulative opioid consumption and pain scores were recorded at 2, 4, 6, and 24 h postoperatively and compared between the groups as were clinical outcomes and length of stay.

Results

The intervention (TAP block) group (n = 33) and the control group (n = 35) were comparable with respect to characteristics, specimen pathology, and type of procedure. The TAP block group’s median cumulative morphine usage (40 mg [IQR = 25–63]) was significantly less than that of the control group (60 mg [IQR = 39–81]). Pain scores and median length of stay (LOS) were similar between the two groups.

Conclusion

Preoperative TAP blocks in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection reduced opioid use in the first postoperative day in this study.     

Posteromedial quadratus lumborum block versus transversus abdominal plane block for postoperative analgesia following laparoscopic colorectal surgery: A randomized controlled trial

Study objectiveOur hypothesis was that a pre-operative posteromedial quadratus lumborum (QL) block would reduce postoperative morphine consumption and provide superior analgesia in the setting of multimodal analgesia compared with a lateral transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block for laparoscopic colorectal surgery.DesignA randomized controlled study.SettingA single tertiary hospital. March to August 2018.Patients80 ASA I–II colorectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection were enrolled. 77 patients (group QL 38, group TAP 39) were included in the analysis.InterventionPre-operatively, patients were randomized to receive either a QL or TAP block (0.375% ropivacaine 20 ml bilaterally for each group).MeasurementsThe primary outcome was cumulative morphine consumption 24 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain scores, clinical recovery, and side-effect profiles of the blocks.Main resultsFor the primary outcome measure, morphine consumption 24 h postoperatively was significantly lower in the QL group than in the TAP group (estimated median difference −8 mg, adjusted 95% confidential interval −12 to −6 mg, P < 0.001). The pain visual analogue scores at rest and during movement were found to be statistically significantly lower in the QL group than in the TAP group 8, 12, and 24 h postoperatively (P < 0.006). The QL group reported higher overall satisfaction scores regarding postoperative analgesia than the TAP group (P = 0.014). One patient in the QL group experienced moderate back pain close to the needle entry site postoperatively. There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative nausea and vomiting, bowel recovery or length of hospital stay between the groups.ConclusionsThe pre-operative bilateral, ultrasound-guided posteromedial QL block reduces morphine consumption and improves analgesia in the setting of multimodal analgesia compared with the lateral TAP block after laparoscopic colorectal surgery.     

Ultrasound control of local anaesthetic location after TAP block performed using landmark-based technique: a cohort study

Objective

TAP is a regional anaesthetic technique where local anaesthesic (LA) is injected between the internal oblique and the transversus abdominis muscles in order to block intercostal nerves. The technique originally described, is based on the identification of the lumbar triangle of Petit as the area where to insert the needle before the LA injection. We performed a study to determine, using ultrasonography, the actual location of the LA when TAP block was performed using landmark-based technique.

Study design

Prospective and observational study.

Methods

Fifty-two patients scheduled for ileostomy closure surgery under general anaesthesia received a TAP block (20 mL 0.75% ropivacaine) based on standard anatomical landmarks technique. Ultrasonography was used immediately after the block to determine the LA placement. Failed blocks were considered when the patient required intravenous morphine in the immediate postoperative period for pain localised at the operative site.

Results

LA solution was injected in the right place in 14 cases out of 52. Only one of these patient received morphine in the postoperative period. In the remaining 38 blocks, the LA was administered in adjacent anatomical structures and 25 failed. Two injections in the peritoneum were observed.

Conclusion

The localization of LA after the TAP block being performed by landmark-based techniques is highly variable. In the majority of patients, the LA was injected in adjacent anatomical structures with unpredictable block results. This may promote the use of ultrasound-guided technique to perform the TAP block.     

腹横肌平面阻滞在腹部手术术后镇痛中的应用

背景 腹横肌平面（transversus abdominis plane block,TAP）阻滞技术是一项近几十年发展起来的新型的局部神经阻滞技术,它可以减少术后镇痛阿片类药物的用量,继而减少其相关副作用,提高患者总的满意度. 目的 介绍TAP阻滞技术,探讨其在腹部手术术后镇痛中的应用. 内容 就TAP阻滞的解剖基础、操作方法、临床效果、并发症及尚待解决的问题等方面进行综述,为临床研究及应用提供参考. 趋向 TAP阻滞技术,被证实在很多手术的术后镇痛应用中是安全、有效的,有着广阔的应用前景.     

A meta-analysis on the clinical effectiveness of transversus abdominis plane block

Study Objective

To study the efficacy of the transversus abdominal plane (TAP) block.

Design

Meta-analysis.

Setting

District general hospital.

Patients

86 patients in the TAP block group and 88 in the non-TAP block group.

Measurements

Statistical analyses were performed using Microsoft Excel 2007 for Windows XP. Hedges g statistic was used for the calculation of standardized mean differences (SMD). Binary data (nausea) were summarized as risk ratios (RR).

Main Results

Patients with TAP block required less morphine after 24 hours than those who did not have the block (random effects model: SMD -4.81, 95% CI [-7.45, -2.17], z = -3.57, P < 0.001). There was less time to first request of morphine in the non-TAP block group (random effects model: SMD 4.80, 95% CI [2.16, 7.43], z = 3.57, P < 0.001). Patients in the TAP block group had less pain up to 24 hours postoperatively. No statistical differences were found with respect to nausea.

Conclusions

TAP block reduces the need for postoperative opioid use, it increases the time first request for further analgesia, it provides more effective pain relief, and it reduces opioid-associated side effects.     

Ultrasound-guided bilateral transversus abdominis plane blocks in conjunction with intrathecal morphine for postcesarean analgesia

Study ObjectiveTo determine whether transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks administered in conjunction with intrathecal morphine provided superior analgesia to intrathecal morphine alone.DesignRandomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.SettingOperating room of a university hospital.Patients51 women undergoing elective Cesarean delivery with a combined spinal-epidural technique that included intrathecal morphine.InterventionsSubjects were randomized to receive a bilateral TAP block with 0.5% ropivacaine or 0.9% saline. Postoperative analgesics were administered on request and selected based on pain severity.MeasurementsPatients were evaluated at 2, 24, and 48 hours after the TAP blocks were performed. Verbal rating scale (VRS) pain scores at rest, with movement, and for colicky pain were recorded, as was analgesic consumption. Patients rated the severity of opioid side effects and their satisfaction with the procedure and analgesia.Main Results51 subjects received TAP blocks with ropivacaine (n = 26) or saline (n = 25). At two hours, the ropivacaine group reported less pain at rest and with movement (0.5 and 1.9 vs 2.8 and 4.9 in the saline group [VRS scale 0 – 10]; P < 0.001) and had no requests for analgesics; there were several requests for analgesia in the saline group. At 24 hours, there was no difference in pain scores or analgesic consumption. At 48 hours, the ropivacaine group received more analgesics for moderate pain (P = 0.04) and the saline group received more analgesics for severe pain (P = 0.01).ConclusionsTransversus abdominis plane blocks in conjunction with intrathecal morphine provided superior early postcesarean analgesia to intrathecal morphine alone. By 24 hours there was no difference in pain scores or analgesic consumption.