Extramedullary Relapse of Acute Leukemia after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Different Characteristics between Acute Myelogenous Leukemia and Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Extramedullary relapse (EMR) of acute leukemia (AL) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a contributor to post-transplantation mortality and remains poorly understood, especially the different characteristics of EMR in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and those with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). To investigate the incidence, risk factors, and clinical outcomes of EMR for AML and ALL, we performed a retrospective analysis of 362 patients with AL who underwent allo-HSCT at the First affiliated Hospital of Soochow University between January 2001 and March 2012. Compared with patients with AML, those with ALL had a higher incidence of EMR (12.9% versus 4.6%; P = .009). The most common site of EMR was the central nervous system, especially in the ALL group. Multivariate analyses identified the leading risk factors for EMR in the patients with AML as advanced disease status at HSCT, hyperleukocytosis at diagnosis, history of extramedullary leukemia before HSCT, and a total body irradiation–based conditioning regimen, and the top risk factors for EMR in the patients with ALL as hyperleukocytosis at diagnosis, adverse cytogenetics, and transfusion of peripheral blood stem cells. The prognosis for EMR of AL is poor, and treatment options are very limited; however, the estimated 3-year overall survival (OS) was significantly lower in patients with AML compared with those with ALL (0 versus 18.5%; P = .000). The characteristics of post–allo-HSCT EMR differed between the patients with AML and those with ALL, possibly suggesting different pathogenetic mechanisms for EMR of AML and EMR of ALL after allo-HSCT; further investigation is needed.     

Extramedullary Relapse of Acute Myelogenous Leukemia after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

The clinical significance of extramedullary relapse (EMR) of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains poorly defined. Here we report the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent allo-HSCT for AML at our institution between 2000 and 2012. A total of 293 patients with AML who underwent allo-HSCT were included. The median duration of follow-up in survivors was 1840 days. Disease status at the time of allo-HSCT was complete remission in 192 patients and nonremission in 101 patients. A total of 110 patients experienced AML relapse after allo-HSCT, including 18 with EMR only, 83 with bone marrow relapse (BMR) only, and 9 with both EMR and BMR. The 5-year cumulative incidence of EMR after allo-HSCT was 9.5%, whereas that of BMR only was 28.9%. In multivariate analysis, peripheral blood stem cell transplantation was associated with an increased risk of EMR. The 2-year overall survival after post-transplantation relapse was 7.5% in patients with BMR only, 11.1% in those with both EMR and BMR, and 27.5% in those with EMR only (P < .05). Although the short-term survival was better in patients with EMR only, they rarely achieved long-term survival. Appropriate strategies for both post-transplantation EMR and BMR are needed.     

Incidence,Risk Factors,and Long-Term Outcomes of Sclerotic Graft-versus-Host Disease after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Sclerotic chronic graft-versus-host disease (sclGVHD) is associated with significant morbidity and a poor quality of life. We reviewed 502 patients diagnosed with chronic GVHD and analyzed the incidence and risk factors of sclGVHD and long-term outcomes and immunosuppressive therapy (IST) cessation in patients with sclGVHD. With a median onset at 18 months the cumulative incidence of sclGVHD was estimated at 22.6% at 5 years (95% confidence interval, 18.6% to 26.8%). Univariate and multivariate analysis identified 2 risk factors for sclGVHD: non-T cell depletion (hazard ratio [HR] 9.09, P < .001) and peripheral blood stem cell (HR 3.87, P < .001). Overall survival (OS) at 5 years was significantly better in the sclGVHD group (88.1%) compared with the non-sclGVHD group (62.7%; P < .001), as were nonrelapse mortality (7.3% versus 21.5% at 5 years) and relapse rates (9.1% versus 19.3% at 5 years). There was no difference in the rate of IST cessation at 5 years (44.8% versus 49.9%, P = .312), but there was a trend of longer IST duration in the sclGVHD group compared with the non-sclGVHD group (median 71.6 months versus 62.9 months). In conclusion, T cell depletion and graft source affect the risk of sclGVHD. SclGVHD did not adversely affect long-term outcomes or IST duration.     

Cord Haploidentical Non-In Vitro T Cell Depletion Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Reduces Relapse of Refractory Acute Leukemia

Whether a graft-versus-graft (GVG) response in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is associated with an enhanced graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect remains highly controversial. Furthermore, it is unknown if the GVG response overwhelms the impact of refractory acute leukemia. We aimed to compare the characteristics and therapeutic outcomes between patients undergoing a modified haploidentical cord blood (cord-haplo) HSCT protocol (n?=?97) and those undergoing haploidentical HSCT (n?=?42) for refractory acute leukemia. A reliable and stable predominant haploidentical donor chimerism was established. The 2-year relapse rate was more favorable in patients undergoing cord-haplo HSCT than in those undergoing haploidentical HSCT (25.9% versus 53.2%; P = .007), as was progression-free survival (PFS; 35.5% versus 17.9%; P = .049). Meanwhile, nonrelapse mortality at 2 years was not significantly different (38.0% versus 24.6%; P = .367). We also found that a higher number of mutual haploidentical donor-mismatched antigens, a concept similar to HLA mismatching, was associated with better disease control. Multivariate analysis identified cord-haplo HSCT as an independent significant predictor of reduced relapse (hazard ratio [HR], .44; P = .028) and improved PFS (HR, .58; P = .033), as was chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (relapse: HR, .42; P ?= .013; PFS: HR, .63: P = .052). However, the incidences of neutrophil and platelet engraftment, GVHD, and virus reactivation were comparable in the 2 groups. This study demonstrates that cord-haplo HSCT significantly enhances the GVL effect and improves PFS, providing a reliable and efficient therapeutic platform for patients with refractory acute leukemia.     

Comparison of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation versus Haploidentical Donor Stem Cell Transplantation for Favorable- and Intermediate-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients in First Complete Remission

Stem cell transplantation (SCT) is an attractive postremission treatment option for patients with intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and for some favorable-risk AML patients with additional nongenetic risk factors. Autologous SCT (auto-SCT) and haploidentical donor SCT (haplo-SCT) are the widely used alternatives in cases of a lack of a HLA-matched donor. However, limited data have been published on the direct comparison between these 2 transplant types. Based on the transplant database in our center, we conducted a retrospective study involving patients with favorable- and intermediate-risk AML in first complete remission (CR1), according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline. Patients with extramedullary disease or those achieving CR by more than 2 cycles were excluded. In total, 195 patients were included in the study, 88 of whom underwent auto-SCT and 107 haplo-SCT. In the entire cohort analyses the impact of high relapse incidence in the auto-SCT group was compensated by low nonrelapse mortality (NRM), which resulted in a comparable overall survival (OS) (79.0%?±?4.6% versus 80.1%?±?5.0%, P?=?.769) and relapse-free survival (RFS) (66.1%?±?5.2% versus 77.4%?±?4.8%, P?=?.079) compared with those observed in the haplo-SCT group. However, for patients with intermediate-risk AML, NRM was similar between the groups, and haplo-SCT exhibited superior survival. In case of post-SCT relapse, patients with intermediate-risk AML showed markedly inferior 3-year OS compared with that shown by patients with favorable-risk AML (23.3%?±?9.8% versus 60.8%?±?14.3%, P?=?.011). In the multivariate analyses, minimal residual disease (MRD) measured by flow cytometry and gene mutation status before transplantation were independent predictors for both OS and RFS. We concluded that both auto-SCT and haplo-SCT were acceptable options for postremission treatment of patients with favorable- and intermediate-risk AML. Haplo-SCT yielded a better outcome in patients with intermediate-risk AML, but the relapse after SCT still led to a poor outcome. Clearance of MRD before SCT could improve the prognosis after transplantation.     

Superior Survival of Unmanipulated Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Compared with Chemotherapy Alone Used as Post-Remission Therapy in Adults with Standard-Risk Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in First Complete Remission

We wanted to compare the efficacy of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) with chemotherapy alone in adults with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in first complete remission (CR1). One hundred thirty-eight consecutive adult patients with standard-risk ALL in CR1 were retrospectively investigated. Of these patients, 59 received chemotherapy alone (group A) and 79 received unmanipulated haploidentical HSCT (group B). Cumulative incidence of relapse at 5 years in group A was significantly higher than that in group B (66.3% versus 29.9%, P < .0001). Overall and disease-free survival in group A were significantly inferior to group B (P < .0001). Moreover, multivariate analyses demonstrated that central nervous system leukemia (P = .002), T cell immunophenotype (P = .044), expression of E2A-PBX1 (P = .007), and positive minimal residual disease after the first cycle of consolidation (P = .004) were correlated with relapse. Patients with 1 of 4 risk factors were assigned to the high-risk group. Otherwise, patients without risk factors were assigned to the low-risk group. In the high-risk group, HSCT had lower relapse rates and superior DFS compared with chemotherapy (P < .05), but in the low-risk group, there were no differences between HSCT and chemotherapy (P > .05). This study is the first to demonstrate that compared with chemotherapy alone, haploidentical HSCT is a better postremission therapy in adults with standard-risk ALL in CR1. Moreover, based on the 4 risk factors, the establishment of risk stratification could identify the subgroup of patients with a higher risk of relapse in adults with standard-risk ALL in CR1. Furthermore, risk stratification–directed postremission therapies using haploidentical HSCT or chemotherapy alone not only reduce relapse rate but also avoid unnecessary treatment-related mortality and improve survival.     

Central Nervous System Relapse in Adults with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Central nervous system (CNS) relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) confers a poor prognosis in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Preventing CNS relapse after HSCT remains a therapeutic challenge, and criteria for post-HSCT CNS prophylaxis have not been addressed. In a 3-center retrospective analysis, we reviewed the data for 457 adult patients with ALL who received a first allogeneic HSCT in first or second complete remission (CR). All patients received CNS prophylaxis as part of their upfront therapy for ALL, but post-transplantation CNS prophylaxis practice varied by institution and was administered to 48% of the patients. Eighteen patients (4%) developed CNS relapse after HSCT (isolated CNS relapse, n = 8; combined bone marrow and CNS relapse, n = 10). Patients with a previous history of CNS involvement with leukemia had a significantly higher rate for CNS relapse (P = .002), and pretransplantation CNS involvement was the only risk factor for post-transplantation CNS relapse found in this study. We failed to find a significant effect of post-transplantation CNS prophylaxis to prevent relapse after transplantation. Furthermore, no benefit for post-transplantation CNS prophylaxis could be detected when a subgroup analysis of patients with (P = .10) and without previous CNS involvement (P = .52) was performed. Finally, we could not find any significant effect for intensity of the transplantation conditioning regimen on CNS relapse after HSCT. In conclusion, CNS relapse is an uncommon event after HSCT for patients with ALL in CR1 or CR2, but with higher risk among patients with CNS involvement before transplantation. Furthermore, neither the use of post-HSCT CNS prophylaxis nor the intensity of the HSCT conditioning regimen made a significant difference in the rate of post-HSCT CNS relapse.     

Significance of Ethnicity in the Risk of Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease and Leukemia Relapse after Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

The significance of patient and donor ethnicity on risk of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and disease relapse after unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is not known. A total of 4335 patient–donor pairs from the International Histocompatibility Working Group in HCT met the following 3 criteria: (1) HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, and -DQB1 allele matched donor, (2) diagnosis of leukemia, and (3) non–T cell depleted GVHD prophylaxis. Posttransplantation risks of acute GVHD and leukemia relapse were defined in Asian/Pacific Islander, white, African American, Hispanic, and Native American patients that underwent transplantation from donors with the same self-described background. Asian patients had a significantly lower incidence of acute GVHD (Japanese patients: 40.0% grades II to IV and 15.3% grades III to IV; non-Japanese Asian patients: 42.1% grades II to IV and 15.7% grades III to IV) compared with white patients (56.5% grades II to IV and 22.6% grades III to IV) (P < .001). The hazard ratio of acute GVHD for white patients was significantly higher than for Japanese patients. Unexpectedly, the hazard ratio of leukemia relapse in white patients with early disease status was also significantly higher than that in Japanese patients. These results provide a platform for future investigation into the genetic factors for unrelated donor HCT and clinical implications of diverse ethnic background.     

Immune Reconstitution after Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) offers the benefits of rapid and nearly universal donor availability and has been accepted worldwide as an alternative treatment for patients with hematologic malignancies who do not have a completely HLA-matched sibling or who require urgent transplantation. Unfortunately, serious infections and leukemia relapse resulting from slow immune reconstitution remain the 2 most frequent causes of mortality in patients undergoing haploidentical HSCT, particularly in those receiving extensively T cell–depleted megadose CD34⁺ allografts. This review summarizes advances in immune recovery after haploidentical HSCT, focusing on the immune subsets likely to have the greatest impact on clinical outcomes. The progress made in accelerating immune reconstitution using different strategies after haploidentical HSCT is also discussed. It is our belief that a predictive immune subset–guided strategy to improve immune recovery might represent a future clinical direction.     

Kinetics and Risk Factors of Relapse after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Children with Leukemia: A Long-Term Follow-Up Single-Center Study

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is an established treatment for high-risk hematological malignancies in the pediatric population, but relapse remains the leading cause of death. We analyzed risk factors associated with relapse.Data from 353 allo-HSCTs from 1989 to 2015 in our center were studied retrospectively. We performed a multivariate analysis of pre- and postransplantation variables and developed a predictive risk score for relapse using the significant factors in this training cohort. The results were confirmed in a validation cohort of 90 allo-HSCTs done in our institution from 2016 to the present.A total of 104 patients relapsed after allo-HSCT, with a relapse cumulative incidence of 31 ± 2%. In multivariate analysis, only 2 variables influenced relapse: disease phase (advanced versus early, HR, 2.84; 95% CI, 1.76 to 4.57; P?=?.001) and presence of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (acute GVHD versus chronic GVHD [HR, 4.27; 95% CI, 1.99 to 9.15; P?=?.0001] and no GVHD versus chronic GVHD [HR, 6.86; 95% CI, 3.63 to 12.97] P?=?.0001]. Applying the personalized risk score (0 to 3), the relapse cumulative incidence was 70 ± 5% in patients with a score of 3 (without GVHD and in the advanced phase) compared with 6 ± 4% in patients with a score of 0 (with chronic GVHD and in an early phase). This score has been verified in the validation set. With a median follow-up of 54 months, the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival rate were 37 ± 3% and 45 ± 4%, respectively.The association of GVHD with the graft-versus-leukemia effect is clearly established in our study, and the form of GVHD associated with less relapse and the best DFS is the classical form of chronic GVHD according to the National Institutes of Health classification. The proposed relapse risk score was validated in an independent cohort and allows personalization of the prognosis.     

Unmanipulated Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Achieved Outcomes Comparable With Matched Unrelated Donor Transplantation in Young Acquired Severe Aplastic Anemia

Salvage haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) is considered in patients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) if a matched unrelated donor (MUD) is unavailable. However, studies on haplo- and MUD transplantation in SAA are lacking. The present study retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 89 young SAA patients who underwent unmanipulated alternative HSCT between September 2012 and September 2016 at our single center. Forty-one patients received haploidentical donors and forty-eight patients MUDs for HSCT. Most were heavily transfused and refractory to previous immunotherapy. The median durations for myeloid engraftment in the haplo- and MUD cohorts were 14 (range, 10 to 21) and 13 (range, 10 to 18) days, respectively. Compared with the MUD cohort, haplo-HSCT cohorts had an increased cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grades II to IV (43.9%?±?7.8% versus 12.5%?±?4.8%, P?=?.001) and grades III to IV (21.1%?±?6.7% versus 6.6%?±?3.7%, P?=?.045) and similar limited chronic GVHD (47.7%?±?8.5% versus 38.5%?±?7.3%, P?=?.129) and extensive chronic GVHD (12.1%?±?6.8% versus 9.1%?±?4.3%, P?=?.198). The median follow-up time of the surviving patients was 26 months (range, 6 to 45). No significant differences were observed between haplo-HSCT and MUD HSCT cohorts in 3-year overall survival (80.3%?±?5.1% versus 89.6%?±?7.0%, P?=?.210), disease-free survival (76.4%?±?5.1% versus 89.4%?±?7.7%, P?=?.127), and GVHD-free failure-free survival (79.0%?±?8.6% versus 71.6%?±?9.3%, P?=?.976). Thus, haplo-HSCT, as salvage therapy, achieved similar outcomes as MUD HSCT in young SAA patients, thereby rendering it as an effective and safe option for SAA.     

HLA-Matched Sibling versus Unrelated versus Haploidentical Related Donor Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients Aged Over 60 Years with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Single-Center Donor Comparison

Haploidentical related donor (HRD) allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) was developed as a valid option for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in the absence of a matched donor. However, many investigators are reluctant to consider the use of this alternative in elderly patients, anticipating high morbidity. Here, we report a single-center comparison of HRD versus matched sibling donor (MSD) and unrelated donor (UD) allo-HSCT for patients with AML aged ≥60 years. Ninety-four patients (MSD: n?=?31; UD: n?=?30; HRD: n?=?33) were analyzed. The median age was 65 (range, 60 to 73) years. We observed a higher cumulative incidence of grade 3 to 4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after UD allo-HSCT (MSD versus UD versus HRD: 3% versus 33% versus 6%, respectively; P?=?.006). Two-year cumulative incidence of moderate or severe chronic GVHD was 17%, 27%, and 16% in the MSD, UD, and HRD groups, respectively (P?=?.487). No difference was observed in the 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse or nonrelapse mortality (NRM) (relapse: MSD versus UD versus HRD: 32% versus 25% versus 25%, respectively; P?=?.411; NRM: MSD versus UD versus HRD: 19% versus 27% versus 24%, respectively; P?=?.709). At 2 years, progression-free survival, overall survival, and GVHD- and relapse-free survival were 48%, 50%, and 39%, respectively, in the MSD group; 48%, 51%, and 23%, respectively, in the UD group; and 50%, 52%, and 32%, respectively, in the HRD group, without statistically significant differences between the groups. We conclude that HRD allo-HSCT is highly feasible and no less efficient than MSD or UD allo-HSCT in patients with AML aged ≥60 years. Thus, the absence of a HLA-identical donor should not limit the consideration of allo-HSCT for the treatment of AML.     

Incidence and Risk Factors for Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Infection after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) recipients are at risk of many infections. Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are increasingly recognized as clinically significant pathogens in this population. We investigated the incidence and risk factors for NTM infection after allogeneic HCT. This retrospective cohort study included all patients with allogeneic HCT at our institution during 2001 to 2013. Patients who developed significant NTM infection (NTM disease) were identified. Multivariable modeling was used to identify risk factors for NTM disease, and a risk score model was constructed to identify high-risk patients. Of 1097 allogeneic HCT patients, 45 (4.1%) had NTM isolated and 30 (2.7%) had NTM disease (28 [93.3%] exclusively pulmonary, 2 [6.7%] pulmonary plus another site). Incidence of NTM infection by competing risk analysis was 2.8% at 5 years (95% CI, 1.9% to 4.0%). The median time to diagnosis was 343 days (range, 19 to 1967). In Fine-Gray proportional hazards modeling, only global severity of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) (HR,?1.99; 95% CI, 1.12 to 3.53; P?=?.019,) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia (HR,?5.77; 95% CI, 1.71 to 19.45; P?=?.004) were significantly associated with NTM disease. Using these variables a risk score was calculated: 1 point for CMV viremia or moderate cGVHD and 2 points for severe cGVHD. The score divided patients into low risk (0 to 1 points, n?=?820 [77.3%], 3-year NTM risk 1.2%), intermediate risk (2 points, n?=?161 [15.4%], 3-year NTM risk 7.1%), and high risk (3 points, n?=?56 [5.4%], 3-year NTM risk 14.3%). NTM disease after allogeneic HCT is common. Severe cGVHD and CMV viremia are associated with increased risk, permitting risk stratification.     

The Art of Transplantation: Conditioning Intensity for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

The search for the optimal conditioning regimen before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) has been ongoing for decades. In this issue, Solh et al present an original analysis evaluating the impact of conditioning intensity on different disease risk index (DRI) groups of patients with AML and MDS. An impressive difference was observed in outcomes between reduced-intensity conditioning and myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimens in the low/intermediate-risk disease groups, supporting the use of MAC in this population. Further prospective trials in this population are encouraged.     

Acute Kidney Injury in Pediatric Patients Receiving Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Incidence,Risk Factors,and Outcomes

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common adverse event after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). AKI is associated with early death or chronic kidney disease among transplant survivors. However, large-scale pediatric studies based on standardized criteria are lacking. We performed a retrospective analysis of 1057 pediatric patients who received allogeneic HCT to evaluate the incidence and risk factors of AKI according to AKI Network criteria within the first 100 days of HCT. We also determined the effect of AKI on patient survival. The 100-day cumulative incidences of all stages of AKI, stage 3 AKI, and AKI requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) were 68.2%?±?1.4%, 25.0%?±?1.3%, and 7.6%?±?.8%, respectively. Overall survival at 1 year was not different between patients without AKI and those with stage 1 or 2 AKI (66.1% versus 73.4% versus 63.9%, respectively) but was significantly different between patients without AKI and patients with stage 3 AKI with or without RRT requirement (66.1% versus 47.3% versus 7.5%, respectively; P?<?.001). Age, year of transplantation, donor type, sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), and acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were independent risk factors for stages 1 through 3 AKI. Age, donor, conditioning regimen, number of HCTs, SOS, and acute GVHD were independent risk factors for AKI requiring RRT. Our study revealed that AKI was a prevalent adverse event, and severe stage 3 AKI, which was associated with reduced survival, was common after pediatric allogeneic HCT. All patients receiving allogeneic HCT, especially those with multiple risk factors, require careful renal monitoring according to standardized criteria to minimize nephrotoxic insults.     

HLA Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplant with Pretransplant Immunosuppression for Patients with Sickle Cell Disease

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is curative in patients with severe sickle cell disease (SCD), but a significant number of patients lack an HLA-identical sibling or matched unrelated donor. Mismatched related (haploidentical) HCT with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY) allows expansion of the donor pool but is complicated by high rates of graft failure. In this report we describe a favorable haploidentical HCT approach in a limited cohort of SCD patients with significant comorbidities. To reduce the risk of graft failure we administered the conditioning regimen of rabbit antithymocyte globulin, busulfan, and fludarabine preceded with 2 courses of pretransplant immunosuppressive therapy (PTIS) with fludarabine and dexamethasone. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of PTCY on days +3 and +4 followed by tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil starting on day +5. Four patients (ages 13, 19, 19, and 23 years) received T cell–replete haploidentical stem cell infusion. All patients engrafted with 99.9% to 100% donor chimerism, and all patients continued with stable engraftment at the last follow-up (5 to 11 months post-transplant). Time to neutrophil engraftment was 14 to 26 days. Two patients had high levels of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies, which required the implementation of an antibody management protocol. This facilitated neutrophil engraftment on day +16 and day +26, respectively. One patient developed grade I acute GVHD, which resolved. Three patients developed mild, limited skin GVHD that responded to conventional immunosuppressive therapy. Human herpesvirus-6 viremia was detected in 3 patients but resolved without treatment. One patient developed asymptomatic cytomegalovirus viremia that responded appropriately to standard therapy with ganciclovir. The prompt, stable engraftment and low toxicity in the post-transplant period makes PTIS with haploidentical transplant a promising option for patients with SCD.     

High Incidence of Autoimmune Disease after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Chronic Granulomatous Disease

There is a lack of consensus regarding the role and method of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) on patients with chronic granulomatous disease (CGD). Long-term follow-up after HSCT in these patient population is essential to know its potential complications and decide who will benefit the most from HSCT. We report the outcome of HSCT and long-term follow-up in 24 patients with CGD, transplanted in our center from either related (n?=?6) or unrelated (n?=?18) donors, over a 12-year period (2003 to 2015), using high-dose alemtuzumab in the preparative regimen. We evaluated the incidence and timing of adverse events and potential risk factors. We described in detailed the novel finding of increased autoimmunity after HSCT in patients with CGD. At a median follow-up of 1460 days, 22 patients were full donor chimeras, and 2 patients had stable mixed chimerism. All assessable patients showed normalization of their neutrophil oxidative burst test. None of the patients developed grades II to IV acute graft-versus-host disease, and no patient had chronic graft-versus-host disease. Twelve of 24 patients developed 17 autoimmune diseases (ADs). Severe ADs (cytopenia and neuropathy) occurred exclusively in the unrelated donor setting and mainly in the first year after HSCT, whereas thyroid AD occurred in the related donor setting as well and more than 3 years after HSCT. Two patients died due to infectious complications after developing autoimmune cytopenias. One additional patient suffered severe brain injury. The remaining 21 patients have long-term Lansky scores?≥?80. The outcome of HSCT from unrelated donors is comparable with related donors but might carry an increased risk of developing severe AD. A lower dose of alemtuzumab may reduce this risk and should be tested in further studies.     

Biology-Driven Approaches to Prevent and Treat Relapse of Myeloid Neoplasia after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

The curative potential of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in the treatment of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) relies mainly on the graft-versus-leukemia effect. Relapse after allo-HCT occurs in a considerable proportion of patients and has a dismal prognosis, with still very limited curative potential. This review provides an overview of the established and evolving approaches to preventing or treating relapse of AML and MDS after allo-HCT, in the context of novel insight into the biology of relapse. Established prophylactic measures to prevent relapse include optimized conditioning and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, as well as donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) for high-risk patients; novel immunomodulatory interventions and maintenance approaches are still experimental. Improved diagnostics can detect persistent or recurring disease at a molecular level, enabling early preemptive interventions. Established options include hypomethylating agents and DLI. Standard treatments for hematologic relapse include chemotherapy, cessation of immunosuppressive treatment, and DLI. Experimental approaches include molecular targeted therapies, novel immunomodulatory treatments, and second allo-HCT. For all interventions, the potential risks, including occurrence of GVHD, must be weighed against the benefits individually in each patient. Concurrently, prevention and treatment of relapse after allo-HCT remain challenging and unmet medical needs.     

Peripheral Blood Hematopoietic Stem Cells for Transplantation of Hematological Diseases from Related,Haploidentical Donors after Reduced-Intensity Conditioning

In a multicenter collaboration, we carried out T cell–replete, peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantations from related, HLA-haploidentical donors with reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (Cy) as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in 55 patients with high-risk hematologic disorders. Patients received 2 doses of Cy 50 mg/kg i.v. on days 3 and 4 after infusion of PBSC (mean, 6.4 × 10⁶/kg CD34⁺ cells; mean, 2.0 × 10⁸/kg CD3⁺ cells). The median times to neutrophil (500/μL) and platelet (>20,000/μL) recovery were 17 and 21 days respectively. All but 2 of the patients achieved full engraftment. The 1-year cumulative incidences of grade II and grade III acute GVHD were 53% and 8%, respectively. There were no cases of grade IV GVHD. The 2-year cumulative incidence of chronic GHVD was 18%. With a median follow-up of 509 days, overall survival and event-free survival at 2 years were 48% and 51%, respectively. The 2-year cumulative incidences of nonrelapse mortality and relapse were 23% and 28%, respectively. Our results suggest that PBSC can be substituted safely and effectively for bone marrow as the graft source for haploidentical transplantation after RIC.