Outcomes of Adults with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Relapsing after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

For patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), treatment options are limited, and the clinical course and prognostic factors affecting outcome have not been well characterized. We retrospectively analyzed outcomes of 123 adult patients with ALL who relapsed after a first HSCT performed at our center between 1993 and 2011. First-line salvage included second HSCT (n = 19), donor lymphocyte infusion with or without prior chemotherapy (n = 11), radiation therapy (n = 6), cytoreductive chemotherapy (n = 30), mild chemotherapy (n = 27), or palliative care (n = 23), with median postrelapse overall survival (OS) of 10 months, 6.5 months, 3 months, 4 months, 4 months, and 1 month, respectively. Despite a complete remission rate of 38% after first-line salvage in the treated patients, the OS rate remained limited with 1- and 2- year OS rates of 17% (95% confidence interval, 13 to 29) and 10% (95% confidence interval, 6 to 20), respectively. On univariate analysis, adverse factors for OS included active disease at the time of first HSCT and short time to progression from first HSCT (<6 months). There was no difference in the 6-month survival postrelapse in patients with isolated extramedullary relapse (44%) compared with combined extramedullary and bone marrow relapse (29%) or those with isolated bone marrow relapse (34%) (P = .8). Our data provide more insight into the disease behavior and treatment outcomes of ALL at relapse after HSCT against which future trials may be compared.     

ASBMT Statement on Routine Prophylaxis for Central Nervous System Recurrence of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Hematologic malignancies treated with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) have a variable incidence of post-transplantation central nervous system (CNS) relapse, with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) representing the most common disease histology. Although data supporting post-transplantation CNS prophylaxis for ALL in the pre-CNS penetrant systemic therapy era established this as standard practice, controversy exists regarding the role of post-transplantation CNS prophylaxis in the contemporary era. Here we review the most relevant (albeit exclusively retrospective) literature to date on the role of post-transplantation CNS prophylaxis in ALL. Given the paucity of data supporting the routine practice of post-transplantation CNS prophylaxis for ALL in the contemporary era, this position statement is anticipated to further stoke controversy and discussion within the transplantation community. Ultimately, only well-designed prospective clinical studies will elucidate the role of routine post-transplantation CNS prophylaxis.     

Outcome of Donor Lymphocyte Infusion after T Cell–depleted Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Acute Myelogenous Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Relapse occurs in 30%-50% of recipients of T cell–depleted (TCD) reduced-intensity conditioned (RIC) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Despite limited published supportive data, donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is used preemptively (pDLI) to improve donor chimerism and prevent relapse, and therapeutically (tDLI) after disease recurrence. We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of pDLI and tDLI in 113 patients after TCD (alemtuzumab, n = 99; antithymocyte globulin, n = 14) RIC HSCT for AML or MDS. Recipients of pDLI (n = 62) had an estimated 5-year overall survival (OS) of 80% and an event-free survival of 65%. More than one-half (52%; n = 32) of the patients received pDLI within 6 months post-HSCT; despite this, the 5-year incidence of graft-versus-host disease was only 31% (95% confidence interval [CI], 19%-43%). Recipients of tDLI (n = 51) had an estimated 5-year OS of 40% and a 5-year relapse/progression rate of 69% (95% CI, 54%-81%). Recipients of tDLI at >6 months post-HSCT had a significantly superior 5-year OS after tDLI compared with those treated earlier (P = .008). The cumulative incidence of graft-versus-host disease at 5 years after tDLI was 45% (95% CI, 23%-65%). We demonstrate that pDLI safely promotes durable remission after TCD RIC HSCT for AML or MDS, and that tDLI salvages patients after late relapse with greater efficacy.     

Mesenchymal Stem Cells versus Mesenchymal Stem Cells Combined with Cord Blood for Engraftment Failure after Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Pilot Prospective,Open-Label,Randomized Trial

Engraftment failure (EF) after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is a serious complication. We prospectively evaluated the effects and safeties of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) alone and MSCs combined with cord blood (CB) for EF. Twenty-two patients were randomized to receive MSCs (MSC group; n = 11) or MSCs plus CB (CB group; n = 11). Patients with no response (NR) to MSCs received the therapeutic schedule in the CB group, and those patients with partial response (PR) in the MSC group and patients without complete remission (CR) in the CB group received another cycle of MSC treatment. Patients who did not achieve CR after 2 cycles of treatments received other treatments, including allogeneic HSCT. After the first treatment cycle, response was seen in 7 of 11 patients in the MSC group and in 9 of 11 in the CB group (P = .635), with a significant difference in neutrophil reconstruction between the 2 groups (P = .030). After 2 treatment cycles, 16 patients achieved CR, 3 achieved PR, and 3 had NR. No patient experienced graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). With a median follow-up of 345 d (range, 129 to 784 d) post-transplantation, 18 patients remained alive and 4 had died (3 from primary disease relapse and 1 from cytomegalovirus pneumonia). The 2-year overall survival, disease-free survival, and cumulative incidence of tumor relapse post-transplantation were 75.2% ± 12.0%, 79.5% ± 9.4%, and 20.5% ± 9.4%, respectively. Our data indicate that the 2 strategies are effective for EF and do not result in GVHD or increase the risk of tumor relapse, but the MSC plus CB regimen has a superior effect on neutrophil reconstruction.     

Long-Term Outcomes of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Severe Treatment-Resistant Autoimmune Cytopenia in Children

We analyzed the long-term outcomes of pediatric patients registered in the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation database who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for severe treatment refractory autoimmune cytopenia. With a median follow-up of 100 months, event-free survival was 54% overall, with no significant difference between allogeneic HSCT (n = 15) and autologous HSCT (n = 7) recipients (58% versus 42%; P = .50). Despite a trend toward failure of response or relapse after autologous HSCT compared with allogeneic HSCT, the difference was not significant (43% versus 13%; P = .30). Treatment-related mortality was high in both HSCT groups (29% and 16%; P = .09). Based on the limited numbers of subjects in this retrospective analysis, both allogeneic and autologous HSCT may induce complete and persistent responses in approximately one-half of pediatric patients with severe refractory autoimmune cytopenia, although treatment-related toxicity is high.     

Central Nervous System Relapse of Leukemia after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Little information is available regarding central nervous system (CNS) relapse of adult leukemia after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Therefore, we reviewed the data of 1226 patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), and chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) who received first allogeneic HSCT between 1994 and 2004, using the database of the Kanto Study Group for Cell Therapy (KSGCT), and analyzed the incidence, risk factors, and outcome of patients with CNS relapse. Twenty-nine patients developed CNS relapse at a median of 296 (9-1677) days after HSCT with a cumulative incidence of 2.3%. Independent significant factors associated with CNS relapse included ALL as the underlying diagnosis (relative risk [RR] = 9.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.26-72.2, P = .029), nonremission at HSCT (RR = 2.30, 95% CI = 1.03-5.15, P = .042), the history of CNS invasion before HSCT (RR = 5.62, 95% CI = 2.62-12.0, P = 9.2 × 10⁻⁶), and the prophylactic intrathecal chemotherapy after HSCT (RR = 2.57, 95% CI = 1.21-5.46, P = .014). The 3-year overall survival (OS) after CNS relapse was 18%. In 7 of 29 patients with CNS relapse, leukemia was observed only in CNS. Three of 7 patients were alive without systemic relapse, resulting in 3-year survival after CNS relapse of 46%. Although the outcome of patients with CNS relapse was generally poor, long-term disease-free survival could be achieved in some patients.     

Superior Survival of Unmanipulated Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Compared with Chemotherapy Alone Used as Post-Remission Therapy in Adults with Standard-Risk Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in First Complete Remission

We wanted to compare the efficacy of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) with chemotherapy alone in adults with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in first complete remission (CR1). One hundred thirty-eight consecutive adult patients with standard-risk ALL in CR1 were retrospectively investigated. Of these patients, 59 received chemotherapy alone (group A) and 79 received unmanipulated haploidentical HSCT (group B). Cumulative incidence of relapse at 5 years in group A was significantly higher than that in group B (66.3% versus 29.9%, P < .0001). Overall and disease-free survival in group A were significantly inferior to group B (P < .0001). Moreover, multivariate analyses demonstrated that central nervous system leukemia (P = .002), T cell immunophenotype (P = .044), expression of E2A-PBX1 (P = .007), and positive minimal residual disease after the first cycle of consolidation (P = .004) were correlated with relapse. Patients with 1 of 4 risk factors were assigned to the high-risk group. Otherwise, patients without risk factors were assigned to the low-risk group. In the high-risk group, HSCT had lower relapse rates and superior DFS compared with chemotherapy (P < .05), but in the low-risk group, there were no differences between HSCT and chemotherapy (P > .05). This study is the first to demonstrate that compared with chemotherapy alone, haploidentical HSCT is a better postremission therapy in adults with standard-risk ALL in CR1. Moreover, based on the 4 risk factors, the establishment of risk stratification could identify the subgroup of patients with a higher risk of relapse in adults with standard-risk ALL in CR1. Furthermore, risk stratification–directed postremission therapies using haploidentical HSCT or chemotherapy alone not only reduce relapse rate but also avoid unnecessary treatment-related mortality and improve survival.     

Phase I Trial of Maintenance Sorafenib after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Fms-like Tyrosine Kinase 3 Internal Tandem Duplication Acute Myeloid Leukemia

The fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) mutation is associated with a high relapse rate for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) even after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Sorafenib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, which inhibits the FLT3 tyrosine kinase and has shown encouraging activity in FLT3-ITD AML. We conducted a phase I trial of maintenance sorafenib after HSCT in patients with FLT3-ITD AML (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01398501). Patients received a variety of conditioning regimens and graft sources. A dose escalation 3 + 3 cohort design was used to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), with an additional 10 patients treated at the MTD. Sorafenib was initiated between days 45 and 120 after HSCT and continued for 12 28-day cycles. Twenty-two patients were enrolled (status at HSCT: first complete remission [CR1], n = 16; second complete remission [CR2], n = 3; refractory, n = 3). The MTD was established at 400 mg twice daily with 1 dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) observed (pericardial effusion). Two patients died of transplantation-related causes, both unrelated to sorafenib. Two patients stopped sorafenib after relapse and 5 stopped because of attributable toxicities after the DLT period. Median follow-up for surviving patients is 16.7 months after HSCT (range, 8.1 to 35.0). There was 1 case of grade II acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after starting sorafenib and the 12-month cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was 38% (90% confidence interval [CI], 21% to 56%). For all patients, 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 85% (90% CI, 66% to 94%) and 1-year overall survival (OS) was 95% (90% CI, 79% to 99%) after HSCT. For patients in CR1/CR2 before HSCT (n = 19), 1-year PFS was 95% (90% CI, 76% to 99%) and 1-year OS was 100%, with only 1 patient who relapsed. Sorafenib is safe after HSCT for FLT3-ITD AML and merits further investigation for the prevention of relapse.     

Improved Survival with Ursodeoxycholic Acid Prophylaxis in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation: Long-Term Follow-Up of a Randomized Study

We report the long-term results of a prospective randomized study on the use of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) for prevention of hepatic complications after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Two hundred forty-two patients, 232 with malignant disease, were randomized to receive (n = 123) or not to receive (n = 119) UDCA from the beginning of the conditioning until 90 days post-transplantation. The results were reported after 1-year follow-up. UDCA administration reduced significantly the proportion of patients developing high serum bilirubin levels as well as the incidence of severe acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), liver GVHD, and intestinal GVHD. In the UDCA prophylaxis group, nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was lower and overall survival better than in the control group. After a 10-year follow-up, the difference in the survival and NRM in favor of the UDCA-treated group, seen at 1 year, was maintained (survival 48% versus 38%, P = .037; NRM 28% versus 41%, P = .01). A landmark analysis in patients surviving at 1 year post-transplantation showed no significant differences between the study groups in the long-term follow-up in chronic GVHD, relapse rate, NRM, disease-free survival, or overall survival. These long-term results continue to support the useful role of UDCA in the prevention of transplant-related complications in allogeneic transplantation.     

Extramedullary Relapse of Acute Leukemia after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Different Characteristics between Acute Myelogenous Leukemia and Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Extramedullary relapse (EMR) of acute leukemia (AL) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a contributor to post-transplantation mortality and remains poorly understood, especially the different characteristics of EMR in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and those with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). To investigate the incidence, risk factors, and clinical outcomes of EMR for AML and ALL, we performed a retrospective analysis of 362 patients with AL who underwent allo-HSCT at the First affiliated Hospital of Soochow University between January 2001 and March 2012. Compared with patients with AML, those with ALL had a higher incidence of EMR (12.9% versus 4.6%; P = .009). The most common site of EMR was the central nervous system, especially in the ALL group. Multivariate analyses identified the leading risk factors for EMR in the patients with AML as advanced disease status at HSCT, hyperleukocytosis at diagnosis, history of extramedullary leukemia before HSCT, and a total body irradiation–based conditioning regimen, and the top risk factors for EMR in the patients with ALL as hyperleukocytosis at diagnosis, adverse cytogenetics, and transfusion of peripheral blood stem cells. The prognosis for EMR of AL is poor, and treatment options are very limited; however, the estimated 3-year overall survival (OS) was significantly lower in patients with AML compared with those with ALL (0 versus 18.5%; P = .000). The characteristics of post–allo-HSCT EMR differed between the patients with AML and those with ALL, possibly suggesting different pathogenetic mechanisms for EMR of AML and EMR of ALL after allo-HSCT; further investigation is needed.     

Pilot Study of Prophylactic Ex Vivo Costimulated Donor Leukocyte Infusion After Reduced-Intensity Conditioned Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

Donor leukocyte infusion (DLI) can induce potent graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) activity in patients with relapsed hematologic malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Unfortunately, except in patients with chronic-phase chronic myelogenous leukemia, responses to DLI have been disappointing. GVL induction is likely to be most effective in the setting of minimal residual disease. Prevention of relapse through the provision of prophylactic DLI to high-risk patients may improve the outcome of allogeneic HSCT. We previously reported that ex vivo costimulated T cell infusion of activated DLI (aDLI) as treatment for relapse is safe and has potent GVL effects. We hypothesized that prophylactic aDLI can be given safely and prevent relapse in high-risk patients after allogeneic HSCT. Eighteen patients with acute myeolgenous leukemia (n = 14), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n = 3), or myelodysplastic syndrome (n = 1) underwent allogeneic HSCT after a reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen with alemtuzumab, fludarabine, and busulfan. Graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of tacrolimus and methotrexate with a planned early and rapid taper of tacrolimus. Patients without GVHD, off immune suppression, and in remission received aDLI at a dose of 1 × 10⁷ CD3⁺ cells/kg (aDLI 1) at day +120, followed by a second infusion of 1 × 10⁸ CD3 cells/kg (aDLI 2) at day +180. At a median follow-up of 58 months, 5 of the 18 patients (28%) were alive, and 4 patients were in remission. Eleven patients (65%) relapsed, at a median time of 191 days. Twelve of the 18 patients received at least one aDLI, and 6 of these 12 patients also received aDLI 2. Six patients did not receive any aDLI owing to early relapse (n = 2), protocol ineligibility (n = 1), or GVHD (n = 3). Only 2 of the 12 patients who received aDLI 1 developed GVHD. Two out of the 12 patients remain in remission at the time of this report. Disease recurrence was the cause of death in 10 of the 13 patients (77%) who died. Our data indicate that prophylactic ex vivo costimulated CD3/CD28 DLI is safe, feasible, and not associated with significant GVHD. Relapse remains the major cause of treatment failure after RIC HSCT even with rapid withdrawal of immune suppression and the use of prophylactic aDLI, and better strategies to prevent relapse are needed.     

Transplantation Conditioning Regimens and Outcomes after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Children and Adolescents with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Relapse is common after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Although 1200 cGy total body irradiation (TBI) and cyclophosphamide (Cy) is the standard conditioning regimen, attempts to reduce relapse have led to the addition of a second chemotherapeutic agent and/or higher dose of TBI. We examined HSCT outcomes in patients age <18 years with ALL, in second or subsequent remission or in relapse at transplantation. Most transplantations were performed with the patient in remission. Patients received grafts from an HLA-matched sibling or unrelated donor. Four treatment groups were created: (1) Cy + TBI ≤ 1200 cGy (n = 304), (2) Cy + etoposide + TBI ≤ 1200 cGy (n = 108), (3) Cy + TBI ≥ 1300 cGy (n = 327), and (4) Cy + etoposide + TBI ≥ 1300 cGy (n = 26). Neither TBI > 1200 cGy nor the addition of etoposide resulted in fewer relapses. The 5-year probability of relapse was 30% for group 1, 28% for group 2, 35% for group 3, and 31% for group 4. However, transplantation-related mortality was higher (35% versus 25%, P = .02) and overall survival lower (36% versus 48%, P = .03) in group 4 compared with group 3. Our findings indicate that compared with the standard regimen, neither TBI > 1200 cGy nor the addition of etoposide improves survival after HSCT for ALL.     

Extramedullary Relapse of Acute Myelogenous Leukemia after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Better Prognosis Than Systemic Relapse

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HSCT) is considered a curative treatment for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). Extramedullary relapse after HSCT for AML is a rare event and is less well defined than systemic, hematologic relapse. We retrospectively studied all patients with AML (n = 436) who underwent HSCT at the University of Minnesota between 1996 and 2008 who developed either a bone marrow (BM) or extramedullary (EM) relapse, and examined the incidence and risk factors for BM and EM relapse. Of 128 patients who relapsed post-HSCT, 25 had relapse in EM sites, either isolated (n = 13) or with concurrent BM relapse (n = 12). Relapse sites included bone (n = 1), central nervous system (n = 6), gastrointestinal (n = 4), lymphatic (n = 4), skin (n = 5), genitourinary (n = 1), pulmonary (n = 1), and soft tissue (n = 3). The time to relapse was longer in the EM sites (median, 328 days vs 168 days). Patients with EM relapse were more likely to have had preceding acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (77% vs 49%; P = .03) or chronic GVHD (46% vs 15%; P = .02) compared with those with BM relapse. The 6-month survival postrelapse was significantly better in patients with isolated EM relapse (69%) compared with those with combined EM and BM relapse (8%) or those with BM relapse alone (27%) (P < .01). Compared with local therapy alone, systemic therapy yielded better 6-month survival in patients with EM relapse. This study suggests differing pathogenesis of BM relapse versus EM relapse of AML after allogeneic HSCT. GVHD and its accompanying graft-versus-leukemia effect may better protect BM sites, but patients with EM relapse have better responses to combined therapy and improved survival compared with those with BM relapse.     

Factors Predictive of Relapse of Acute Leukemia in Children after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

The presence of minimal residual disease (MRD) before transplantation is the most important prognostic risk factor predictive of post-transplantation relapse in hematologic malignancies. However, MRD alone does not adequately predict relapse in all patients. To improve upon the ability to identify patients likely to relapse, we evaluated risk factors, in addition to MRD, that may be associated with development of post-transplantation relapse. In this single institution, retrospective cohort study of children with acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome who had undergone a first allogeneic transplantation and had pretransplantation MRD evaluation, 40 of 93 patients (43%) experienced relapse. Univariate analysis demonstrated that African American race, high initial white blood cell count, central nervous system (CNS) disease at diagnosis, short first complete remission, nonmyeloablative (NMA) conditioning, lack of remission, and MRD before transplantation were associated with worse relapse-free survival (RFS). In a Cox multivariable analysis, CNS disease (P = .009), lack of remission (P = .01), and NMA conditioning (P = .04) were independently associated with inferior RFS. Among those in a morphologic complete remission who underwent a myeloablative transplantation, having both CNS disease at diagnosis (specifically in acute lymphoblastic leukemia) and MRD positivity was an independent risk factor predictive of relapse, which has not been previously reported. Results from our study support the existence of risk factors complimentary to pretransplantation MRD. Validation in a larger independent homogenous cohort is needed to develop a prognostic tool for clinical use to predict post-transplantation relapse.     

Differences in Graft-versus-Host Disease Characteristics between Haploidentical Transplantation Using Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide and Matched Unrelated Donor Transplantation Using Calcineurin Inhibitors

We assessed differences in presentation and response to therapy in 394 consecutive patients who developed acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after receiving their first allogeneic transplantation (HSCT) from a 10/10 HLA allele-matched unrelated donor (MUD; n = 179) using calcineurin inhibitors or a T cell-replete haploidentical donor (haplo; n = 215) and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide at our center between 2005 and 2017. The median duration of follow-up for survivors was 52.5 months. The cumulative incidences for grade II-IV and grade III-IV acute GVHD at day 180 post HCT were similar, at 39% and 14%, respectively, for haplo-HSCT compared with 50% and 16% for MUD HSCT (P not significant). Haplo-HSCT recipients had a lower cumulative incidence of moderate to severe chronic GVHD, at 22% (severe, 19%), compared with 31% (severe, 29%) for MUD HSCT recipients (P = .026). The time to onset of moderate to severe chronic GVHD was faster for haplo-HSCT recipients (213 days versus 280 days; P = .011). Among patients with grade II-IV acute GVHD, there was no significant between-group difference in organ involvement, with skin the most affected (75% for haplo-HSCT versus 70% for MUD HSCT), followed by the gastrointestinal tract (71% versus 69%) and liver (14% versus 17% MUD). For chronic GVHD, haplo-HSCT recipients had less involvement of the eyes (46% versus 75% for MUD; P < .001) and of the joints/fascia (12% versus 36%; P = .001). Also for cGVHD patients, haplo-HSCT recipients and MUD HSCT recipients had similar all-cause mortality (22% versus 18%; P = .89), but the former were more likely to be off immunosuppression at 2 years post-HCT (63% versus 43%; P = .03) compared with MUD.     

Incidence and Outcome of Late Relapse after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Myelofibrosis

In this cross-sectional study, we retrospectively evaluated the files of 227 patients with myelofibrosis who underwent transplantation between 1994 and 2015 for relapse later than 5 years after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). A total of 94 patients who were alive and in remission at 5 years were identified with follow-up of at least 5 years (median, 9.15 years) after SCT. Thirteen patients (14%) experienced late molecular (n = 6) or hematologic (n = 7) relapse at a median of 7.1 years while 81 patients did not experience relapse. Relapse patients received either donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) (n = 7) and/or second transplantation (n = 4). Of those, 72.7% achieved again full donor cell chimerism and molecular remission, and after a median follow-up of 45 months, the 3-year overall survival rates for patients with or without relapse were 90.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 77% to 100%) and 98.8% (95% CI, 96% to 100%), respectively (P = .13). We conclude that late relapse occurs in about 14% of the patients and the majority can be successfully salvaged with DLI and/or second allograft. All patients with molecular relapse are alive and support the long-time molecular monitoring in myelofibrosis patients after allogeneic SCT.     

Impact of Pretransplantation Risk Factors on Post Transplantation Outcome of Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Remission after Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

The impact of risk-related parameters has not been defined in transplantation settings. We wondered whether the currently recognized predictors could be used to categorize acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who underwent transplantation during remission into risk groups. We analyzed the data of 255 consecutive patients (median age, 26) with AML in their first or second remission (CR1 or CR2) after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Three parameters were found to be predictive of outcome: response after induction therapy, white blood cell count at diagnosis, and cytogenetics. These three factors were combined to yield two risk groups. The 2-year cumulative incidences of relapse for patients at low and high risk were 8% and 36% (P = .001), respectively. The 3-year probabilities of leukemia-free survival for these two groups were 80% and 52% (P = .001), respectively. Multivariate analysis for relapse and for leukemia-free survival showed that not achieving CR after two courses of therapy was the strongest independent prognostic factor (P = .001 and P = .028, respectively). In addition, in a subgroup of patients with quantification of minimal residual disease at the time of HSCT, positive minimal residual disease at this time point was correlated with a poor outcome. Our results suggest that the pretransplantation risk factors influence posttransplantation outcomes of patients with AML in CR after haploidentical HSCT and might be applicable to assist with risk-directed posttransplantation therapy.     

Cytogenetics,Donor Type,and Use of Hypomethylating Agents in Myelodysplastic Syndrome with Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

We investigated the impact of patient and disease characteristics, including cytogenetics, previous therapy, and depth of response, on the outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). We analyzed 256 MDS patients who underwent transplantation from a matched related (n = 133) or matched unrelated (n = 123) donor after 2001. Of the 256, 78 (30.5%) did not receive cytoreductive therapy before HSCT; 40 (15.6%) received chemotherapy, 122 (47.7%) received hypomethylating agents (HMA), and 16 (6.2%) received both (chemo+HMA). Disease status at HSCT defined by International Working Criteria was complete remission in 46 (18%) patients. There were significant differences between therapy groups: there were more therapy-related MDS and higher use of matched related donor in the untreated group. The chemotherapy group had higher serum ferritin levels at HSCT. Patients were older and had more high-risk disease by revised International Prognostic Scoring in the HMA group. Despite those differences, transplantation outcomes were similar in patients who were untreated and who received cytoreductive therapy before HSCT. Three-year event-free survival (EFS) was 44.2%, 30.6%, 34.2%, and 32.8% for untreated, chemotherapy, HMA, and chemo+HMA groups, respectively (P = .50). Multivariate analyses revealed that older age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.3; P = .001); high-risk histologic subtypes, including refractory anemia with excess blasts (HR, 1.5; P = .05) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (HR, 2.1; P = .03), high-risk cytogenetics with monosomal karyotype (MK) (HR, 4.0; P < .0001) and high serum ferritin level at HSCT (HR, 1.8; P = .002) were poor prognostic factors for EFS. Bone marrow blast count 5% or higher at HSCT (HR, 1.6; P = .01) and MK (HR, 4.2; P < .0001) were the only prognostic factors for increased relapse incidence after HSCT. Patients with MK represented a poor prognostic group, with 3-year EFS of 11.4% and relapse incidence of 60.9%. In this analysis, various therapy approaches before HSCT did not lead to different transplantation outcomes. Cytogenetics defined by MK was able to identify a very poor prognostic groups that innovative transplantation approaches to improve outcomes are urgently needed.     

Augmenting Total Body Irradiation with a Cranial Boost before Stem Cell Transplantation Protects Against Post-Transplant Central Nervous System Relapse in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of a pretransplant cranial boost (CB) on post-transplant central nervous system (CNS) relapse and survival in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) using a total body irradiation (TBI)-containing preparation regimen. Two hundred thirteen ALL patients were treated consecutively at our institution with allogeneic HSCT. Conditioning included TBI (1320?cGy in 8 fractions given twice daily) and cyclophosphamide (120?mg/kg) with or without fludarabine (75?mg/m²). Patients were divided into 4 groups based on history of CNS disease and whether a CB was given. Of the 160 patients with no history of CNS disease, none received a CB (CNS?/CB?). Of the 53 patients with prior CNS disease, 41 had not received prior cranial irradiation. Thirty of these 41 received a CB of 900 to 1000?cGy in 5 daily fractions (CNS+/CB+), whereas the other 11 did not receive a CB because of physician preference (CNS+/CB?). The remaining 12 patients with prior CNS involvement had previously received cranial irradiation and thus were not candidates for a CB (CNS?+?PriorRT). Two-year CNS relapse risk, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Seven patients experienced post-transplant CNS relapse: 4 in the CNS?/CB? group, 2 in the CNS+/CB? group, and 1 in the CNS?+?PriorRT group. None of the 30 patients who received a CB relapsed in the CNS. Two-year CNS relapse risk was 0% in the CNS+/CB+ group compared with 21% (95% CI, 0% to 45%) in the CNS+/CB? group (P?=?.03). Two-year OS and DFS did not differ between the groups. In conclusion, among ALL patients with prior CNS leukemia, there was a trend toward a reduced risk of post-transplant CNS relapse in patients who received a CB. However, the addition of a CB did not appear to have an impact on OS or DFS.     

Postremission Consolidation by Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT) for Acute Myeloid Leukemia in First Complete Remission (CR) and Negative Implications for Subsequent Allogeneic HCT in Second CR: A Study by the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)

After autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in the first complete remission (CR1), patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) may relapse and undergo allogeneic HCT in the second complete remission (CR2). The aim of this study was to analyze the outcome of allogeneic HCT performed in CR2 comparing patients with prior consolidation by autologous HCT versus patients with chemotherapy consolidation. Included were 2619 adults with allogeneic HCT in CR2 from 2000 to 2017 with (n = 417) or without (n = 2202) prior autologous HCT. Patient groups were not entirely comparable; patients with prior autologous HCT were younger, had less often a favorable cytogenetic profile, had more commonly donors other than matched siblings, and more often received reduced-intensity conditioning. In multivariate analysis, nonrelapse mortality risks in patients with prior autologous HCT were 1.34 (1.07 to 1.67; P = .01) after adjustment for age, cytogenetic risk, transplant year, donor, conditioning intensity, sex matching, interval diagnosis-relapse, and relapse-allogeneic HCT as compared with chemotherapy consolidation. Similarly, risks of events in leukemia-free survival and graft-versus-host disease, relapse-free survival were higher with prior autologous HCT, 1.17 (1.01 to 1.35), P = .03 and 1.18 (1.03 to 1.35), P = .02, respectively. Risk of death was also higher, 1.13 (0.97 to 1.32), P = .1, but this was not significant. Postremission consolidation with autologous HCT for AML in CR1 increases toxicity of subsequent allogeneic HCT in CR2.