High-Dose Chemotherapy with Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Elderly Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma: A Nationwide Retrospective Study

The number of elderly patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) continues to increase but the data regarding autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for elderly patients are limited. We analyzed 484 patients, ages 60 years or over, diagnosed with relapsed/refractory DLBCL who received ASCT from 1993 to 2010 in the Japan Society for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation database. Median age was 64 years (range, 60 to 78). To evaluate the impact of age at ASCT, patients were classified into 3 groups: those between the ages of 60 to 64, 65 to 69, and 70 years or over. Overall nonrelapse mortality (NRM) at day 100, 1 year, and 2 years was 4.1%, 5.9% and 7.7%, respectively. NRM did not significantly differ among age groups (P = .60). Two-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 48% and 58%, respectively. PFS and OS were significantly longer in patients 60 to 64 years old; however, the survival rate was acceptable even in those 70 or over, with a 2-year OS of 46%. ASCT is feasible in selected elderly patients and age alone should not be a contraindication for ASCT. Eligibility should be individualized and identification of a subset of elderly patients at high risk of treatment-related morbidity or mortality warrants investigation.     

Efficacy of High-Dose Therapy and Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Gray Zone Lymphoma: A US Multicenter Collaborative Study

High-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) has been anecdotally prescribed in gray zone lymphoma (GZL), showing encouraging efficacy. We conducted a multicenter retrospective study aimed at assessing outcomes after auto-HCT in 32 patients with GZL treated at 9 transplantation centers in the United States. The median age of patients at transplantation was 38 years (range, 18 to 70 years), and the majority were male (n?=?21; 66%). The median number of lines of therapy before transplantation was 2 (range, 1 to 4). BEAM was the most commonly prescribed regimen (n?=?23; 72%). The median duration of follow-up for surviving patients was 34 months (range, 1 to 106 months). Median overall survival (OS) was not reached. The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and OS for all patients were 69% and 78%, respectively. Three-year PFS and OS were 100% for patients who received only 1 line of therapy before auto-HCT versus 65% (PFS, P?=?.25) and 75% (OS, P?=?.39) for those receiving >1 line. The cumulative incidence of relapse/progression was 4% at 1 year post-transplantation and 31% at 3 years post-transplantation. The 3-year nonrelapse mortality was 0%. These findings suggest that HDT and auto-HCT is an effective treatment in patients with GZL. Our findings ideally require confirmation in a larger cohort of patients, preferably in the setting of large prospective multicenter randomized controlled trials. However, we acknowledge that such studies could be difficult to conduct in patients with GZL owing to the disease's rarity. Alternatively, a multicenter prospective study that includes tissue banking and a data registry is warranted to help better understand the biology and natural history of the disease.     

Autologous Transplantation in Follicular Lymphoma with Early Therapy Failure: A National LymphoCare Study and Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research Analysis

Patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) experiencing early therapy failure (ETF) within 2 years of frontline chemoimmunotherapy have poor overall survival (OS). We analyzed data from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) and the National LymphoCare Study (NLCS) to determine whether autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (autoHCT) can improve outcomes in this high-risk FL subgroup. ETF was defined as failure to achieve at least partial response after frontline chemoimmunotherapy or lymphoma progression within 2 years of frontline chemoimmunotherapy. We identified 2 groups: the non-autoHCT cohort (patients from the NLCS with ETF not undergoing autoHCT) and the autoHCT cohort (CIBMTR patients with ETF undergoing autoHCT). All patients received rituximab-based chemotherapy as frontline treatment; 174 non-autoHCT patients and 175 autoHCT patients were identified and analyzed. There was no difference in 5-year OS between the 2 groups (60% versus 67%, respectively; P?=?.16). A planned subgroup analysis showed that patients with ETF receiving autoHCT soon after treatment failure (≤1 year of ETF; n?=?123) had higher 5-year OS than those without autoHCT (73% versus 60%, P?=?.05). On multivariate analysis, early use of autoHCT was associated with significantly reduced mortality (hazard ratio, .63; 95% confidence interval, .42 to .94; P?=?.02). Patients with FL experiencing ETF after frontline chemoimmunotherapy lack optimal therapy. We demonstrate improved OS when receiving autoHCT within 1 year of treatment failure. Results from this unique collaboration between the NLCS and CIBMTR support consideration of early consolidation with autoHCT in select FL patients experiencing ETF.     

Upfront Consolidation Combining Yttrium-90 Ibritumomab Tiuxetan and High-Dose Therapy with Stem Cell Transplantation in Poor-Risk Patients with Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma

We evaluated the safety and efficacy of standard-dose yttrium-90 (Y⁹⁰) ibritumomab tiuxetan combined with high-dose BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan) after first-line induction treatment in young patients with poor prognoses diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00689169). Seventy-five high-risk (≥2 International Prognostic Index [IPI] factors) consecutive DLBCL patients (≤65 years old) in complete remission (CR) or partial remission (PR) after rituximab chemotherapy were treated with Y⁹⁰ ibritumomab tiuxetan and BEAM regimen followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). The median follow-up was 34 months. Of the 75 patients, 71 underwent ASCT and were eligible for analysis. Median time to reach a neutrophil count of >500/μL and platelet count of >20,000/μL was 11 days. Mucositis ≥3 (51%) occurred in most patients. Other adverse events were similar to those seen with BEAM alone. The overall response rate was 86%; 59 patients (83%) achieved a CR or unconfirmed CR. The 2-year event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival were 79%, 83%, and 91%, respectively. Disease status (CR/PR) and positron emission tomography (PET) findings before transplantation did not predict treatment failure. The IPI (2 versus >2) and maximum tumor diameter of ≥10 cm at diagnosis appeared to be prognosis factors for OS but not for EFS. Adding Y⁹⁰ ibritumomab tiuxetan to BEAM is safe and does not increase transplantation-related toxicity. First-line consolidation with Y⁹⁰ ibritumomab tiuxetan and high-dose chemotherapy induced high rates of EFS and OS in poor-prognosis patients with DLBCL, regardless of PET status after induction treatment and warrants a randomized study.     

Infused Autograft Lymphocyte to Monocyte Ratio and Survival in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma

Infused autograft absolute lymphocyte count is a prognostic factor for survival after autologous peripheral hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (APHSCT) for diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). CD14⁺ HLA-DR^low/neg immunosuppressive monocytes affect tumor growth by suppressing host antitumor immunity. Thus, we set out to investigate if the infused autograft lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (A-LMR), as a biomarker of host immunity (ie, lymphocytes) and immunosuppression (ie, monocytes), affects survival after APHSCT. From 1994 to 2012, 379 DLBCL patients who underwent APHSCT were studied. The 379 patients were randomly divided into a training set (n = 253) and a validation set (n = 126). Receiver operating characteristic and area under the curve identified an A-LMR ≥1 as the best cut-off value, which was validated by the k-fold cross-validation in the training set. Multivariate analysis showed A-LMR to be an independent prognostic factor for survival in the training set. Patients with an A-LMR ≥ 1.0 experienced superior overall survival (OS) compared with patients with an A-LMR <1.0 (median OS: 167.2 versus 17.6 months; 5-year OS: 73% [95% confidence interval (CI), 63% to 80%] versus 30% [95% CI, 2% to 38%], P < .0001, respectively) in the training set. In the validation set, an A-LMR ≥ 1 showed a median OS of 181.2 months versus 19.5 months for an A-LMR <1, and 5-year OS rates of 67% (95% CI, 52% to 79%) versus 35% (95% CI, 25% to 47%), P < .0001, respectively. The A-LMR provides a platform to engineer immunocompetent autograft to improve clinical outcomes in DLBCL patients undergoing APHSCT.     

Specific Features Identify Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma Benefitting from Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Outcomes with autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto HCT) for relapsed and/or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) are typically poor. We hypothesized that certain factors could predict which patients experience a favorable outcome with this approach. We thus developed a predictive score from a cohort of 67 such patients using 3 factors independently associated with progression-free survival (PFS): (1) simplified Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index score before auto HCT (hazard ratio [HR], 2.9; P = .002); (2) B symptoms at diagnosis (HR, 2.7; P = .005); and (3) remission quotient, calculated by dividing the time, in months, from diagnosis to auto HCT by the number of prior treatments (HR, 1.4; P = .02). The estimated 5-year PFS for favorable-risk patients (n = 23) and unfavorable-risk patients (n = 44) were 58% (95% confidence interval [CI], 34% to 75%) and 15% (95% CI, 6% to 28%), respectively. These factors also independently predicted overall survival. In summary, we have defined 3 simple factors that can identify patients with relapsed/refractory MCL who derive a durable benefit from salvage auto HCT.     

Phase I/II Study of Bortezomib-BEAM and Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Relapsed Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma,Transformed, or Mantle Cell Lymphoma

A phase I/II trial was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of adding bortezomib to standard BEAM (BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Eligible patients had relapsed/refractory indolent or transformed non-Hodgkin lymphoma or mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) that was relapsed/refractory or in first partial (PR) or complete remission (CR). Patients received bortezomib on days −11, −8, −5, and −2 before ASCT. Phase I had 4 dose cohorts (.8, 1, 1.3, and 1.5 mg/m²) and 3 patients were accrued to each. Any nonhematological ASCT-related toxicity >2 on the Bearman scale occurring between day −11 and engraftment defined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). After the MTD has been reached, another 20 patients were enrolled at this dose to determine a preliminary overall response rate (ORR). Patients who were in CR or PR at day +100 were considered responders. The study enrolled 42 patients through August 14, 2009. The median age was 58 (range, 34 to 73) years, with 33 males and 9 females. The most common diagnoses were MCL (23 patients) and follicular lymphoma (7 patients). The median number of prior therapies was 1 (range, 0 to 6). The median follow-up was 4.88 (range, 1.07 to 6.98) years. Thirteen patients were treated in phase I and 29 patients were treated in phase II. The MTD was initially determined to be 1.5 mg/m² but it was later decreased to 1 mg/m² because of excessive gastrointestinal toxicity and peripheral neuropathy. The ORR was 95% at 100 days and 87% at 1 year. For all 38 evaluable patients at 1 year, responses were CR 84%, PR 1%, and progressive disease 13%. Progression-free survival (PFS) was 83% (95% CI, 68% to 92%) at 1 year, and 32% (15% to 51%) at 5 years. Overall survival (OS) was 91% (95% CI, 79% to 96%) at 1 year and 67% (50% to 79%) at 5 years. The most common National Cancer Institute grade 3 toxicities were neutropenic fever (59%), anorexia (21%), peripheral neuropathy (19%), orthostatic hypotension/vasovagal syncope (16%), and 1 patient failed to engraft. Compared with 26 MCL in CR1 historic controls treated with BEAM and ASCT, PFS was 85% and 43% for the BEAM group versus 87% and 57% for those who received bortezomib in addition to standard BEAM (V-BEAM) at 1 and 5 years, respectively (log-rank P = .37). OS was 88% and 50% for the BEAM group versus 96% and 72% for V-BEAM at 1 and 5 years, respectively (log-rank P = .78). In conclusion, V-BEAM and ASCT is feasible. The toxicities were manageable and we did not observe any treatment-related mortalities; however, we did observe an excess of autonomic dysfunction and ileus, which is concerning for overlapping toxicity with BEAM conditioning. Determining relative efficacy of V-BEAM compared to BEAM would require a randomized trial.     

Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Plasmablastic Lymphoma: A Review

Plasmablastic lymphoma (PBL) is recognized by the World Health Organization as a very aggressive subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. It was initially described in the setting of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, but it has since been identified in immunocompetent patients, as well. PBL is characterized by CD20 negativity and is associated with Epstein-Barr virus infection. The outcome with available therapy is poor, with median survival of less than 1 year. Multiple adverse prognostic factors have been identified, including HIV-negativity, MYC gene rearrangement, high-risk international prognostic index, and not achieving complete remission after induction therapy. The role of intensification of induction chemotherapy is controversial. Novel agents have shown some activity in relapsed setting and may have a role in upfront line of treatment. The outcome for relapsed PBL is dismal. Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) appears to be feasible and may produce better results than chemotherapy, but definitive data are sparse. Chemosensitivity before transplantation might be required to benefit from such therapy. Some data suggest a better outcome of PBL if consolidation with AHCT is used in first-line setting, particularly for those with high-risk disease.     

Favorable Outcomes in Elderly Patients Undergoing High-Dose Therapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

High-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT-ASCT) can offer potential long-term remission or cure in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Limited experience is available on the safety and efficacy of HDT-ASCT in elderly patients. This is a single-center, retrospective study examining outcomes of HDT-ASCT for 202 NHL patients, ages 60 years and older, between January 2001 and December 2012. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed according to age at HDT-ASCT, hematopoietic cell transplantation comorbidity index (HCT-CI), NHL histology, and remission status at the time of HDT-ASCT. The median age was 65 years (range, 60 to 74) and the majority had either diffuse large B cell lymphoma (n = 73, 37%) or mantle cell lymphoma (n = 69, 34%). One hundred and fifteen patients (57%) had high HCT-CI scores at the time of HDT-ASCT. With a median follow-up of 3.6 years (range, 4 to 11.9 years) for survivors, PFS and OS at 3 years were 60% (95% confidence interval [CI], 53% to 68%) and 73% (95% CI, 67% to 80%), respectively. Transplantation-related mortality (TRM) was 4% both at 100 days and at 1 year after HDT-ASCT. Age and HCT-CI score were not associated with OS or PFS, and high HCT-CI did not correlate with TRM. Seven patients (4%) developed secondary myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukemia at a median of 35 months (range, 6 to 48) after HDT-ASCT. In this single-center cohort of elderly patients with NHL undergoing HDT-ASCT, this intervention was proven tolerable and effective, with results similar to those of historic controls in younger patients. Our data suggest that age alone should not preclude HDT-ASCT in elderly patients.     

Distinctive Infectious Complications in Patients with Central Nervous System Lymphoma Undergoing Thiotepa,Busulfan, and Cyclophosphamide-conditioned Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation

We investigated the incidence of viral, fungal, bacterial, and parasitic infections observed in 57 patients with central nervous system lymphoma after thiotepa, busulfan, and cyclophosphamide-conditioned autologous stem cell transplantation (TBC-ASCT) and 79 patients with systemic non-Hodgkin lymphoma after traditional carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan–conditioned ASCT (BEAM-ASCT). Twenty of 57 (35%) TBC-ASCT patients had detectable viremia with human herpesvirus 6, cytomegalovirus, adenovirus, or BK virus, versus 9 of 79 (11%) BEAM-ASCT patients. Eight TBC-ASCT patients had clinically relevant viral infections (4 human herpesvirus 6, 2 cytomegalovirus, 1 adenovirus, 2 BK virus), versus 0 in the BEAM-ASCT group. Four TBC-ASCT patients suffered infections from either a fungal or parasitic pathogen versus 1 BEAM-ASCT patient. TBC was associated with greater risk of viral reactivation compared with BEAM, independent of other factors (hazard ratio, 4.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.9 to 11.3; P?<?.001). Prolonged lymphopenia and steroid use in the peri- and post-ASCT period did not explain these observed differences. The pathogenesis of these unusual infections in TBC-ASCT patients remains incompletely understood, and may involve more potent immune suppression with TBC conditioning. Clinicians should be aware of these differences in infection risk in TBC-ASCT patients, which more closely parallel those seen in allogenic hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients. New prophylactic approaches to help minimize these infections should be considered in this population.     

培门冬酶联合CHOP治疗弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤的临床观察

目的探讨培门冬酶(pegasparaginase,PEG-Asp)联合CHOP方案治疗弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤的疗效及对免疫功能的影响。方法选取2014年6月至2017年12月我院住院治疗的120例晚期弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤患者,随机分为观察组及对照组,各60例,对照组给予CHOP方案化疗,观察组在对照组治疗的基础上加用培门冬酶,比较两组临床疗效、不良反应及免疫功能。结果观察组临床有效率(53/60,88.3%)高于对照组(41/60,68. 3%),差异具有统计学意义;两组治疗后CD3^+T、CD4^+T细胞百分比、CD4^+T/CD8^+T比值比较,差异均有统计学意义;两组的主要不良反应为骨髓抑制和胃肠道反应,不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义。结论培门冬酶辅助治疗弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤临床疗效显著,不增加化疗毒性,减轻化疗药物对免疫功能的抑制,值得临床进一步推广。     

Outcomes of Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma Transformed from Follicular Lymphoma

There are limited data on the outcomes of autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in diffuse large B cell lymphoma transformed from follicular lymphoma. We analyzed transplantation outcomes in 141 subjects with biopsy-proven diffuse large B-cell lymphoma transformed from follicular lymphoma reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research between 1990 and 2009. Two groups were identified: autologous HCT (auto-HCT; n = 108) and allogeneic HCT (allo-HCT; n = 33). Fewer auto-HCTs were done for transformed follicular lymphoma in 2003 to 2009, with a shift favoring allo-HCT. Auto-HCT was associated with a 1-year nonrelapse mortality (NRM) of 8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4% to 14%), 5-year progression-free survival of 35% (95% CI, 26% to 45%), and 5-year overall survival of 50% (95% CI, 40% to 59%). In contrast, allo-HCT was associated with a 1-year NRM of 41% (95% CI, 23% to 58%), 5-year progression-free survival of 18% (95% CI, 6% to 35%), and 5-year overall survival of 22% (95% CI, 8% to 41%). Auto-HCT for transformed follicular lymphoma achieves sustained remission in a high proportion of subjects. The high NRM of allo-HCT offset any benefit that might be associated with this transplantation modality.     

A Comprehensive Assessment of Toxicities in Patients with Central Nervous System Lymphoma Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Using Thiotepa,Busulfan, and Cyclophosphamide Conditioning

High-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) with thiotepa, busulfan, and cyclophosphamide (TBC) conditioning has emerged as an effective postinduction treatment strategy for patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) or secondary central nervous system lymphoma (SCNSL), but it is associated with considerable toxicity and transplantation-related mortality (TRM) in the modern era. Forty-three adult patients with chemosensitive PCNSL or SCNSL underwent TBC-conditioned ASCT between 2006 and 2015. Twenty-eight of these patients received pharmacokinetically (PK)-targeted busulfan dosing. The median number of clinically relevant individual grade?≥3 nonhematologic toxicities per patient was 5. We found no association between pretransplantation patient characteristics and the presence of more than 5 grade?≥3 nonhematologic toxicities. Patients with elevated first-dose busulfan area under the curve values did not experience more toxicity. Paradoxically, patients treated with more than 2 regimens before undergoing ASCT had lower first-dose busulfan AUC values. With a median follow-up among survivors of 20 months, 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from the time of ASCT were 83% and 87%, respectively. Although this study reaffirms the favorable PFS and OS associated with TBC-conditioned ASCT for PCNSL or SCNSL, this treatment strategy carries a large toxicity burden.     

血清C-反应蛋白对弥漫大B淋巴瘤患者预后评估及相关性分析

目的 探讨C-反应蛋白(CRP)的表达对于弥漫大B淋巴瘤(DLBCL)意义及其与预后之间的关系.方法 选取91例在我院住院治疗的DLBCL患者;同期选取健康体检者87例,采用酶联免疫法检测所有受试人群的CRP水平,比较不同分期、分型患者的CRP水平.结果 DLBCL患者的CRP表达水平为(24.03±6.92)mg/L,相比于健康人群的(6.59±2.87)mg/L明显提高,对照组与不同病理分期CRP水平比较,差异具有统计学差异(P<0.05),且随着临床分期增加而逐渐上升;高表达CRP患者化疗有效率为44.83%,低表达CRP组为77.27%,组间比较差异有统计学意义,χ2=31.728,P<0.05.其中对照组的血清CRP水平均低于GCB组和NGCB组,而GCB组低于NGCB组,组间比较差异具有统计学差异(P<0.05).结论 采取CRP检测可以有效反应不同类型、分期及疾病严重度DLBCL患者疾病状况的变化以及预后评估.     

Phase II Trial of High-Dose Gemcitabine/Busulfan/Melphalan with Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Primary Refractory or Poor-Risk Relapsed Hodgkin Lymphoma

We conducted a prospective phase 2 trial of gemcitabine, busulfan and melphalan (Gem/Bu/Mel) with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with primary refractory or poor-risk relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) (ie, extranodal relapse or within 1 year of frontline therapy). The trial was powered to detect an improvement in 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) from a historical 50% using a BEAM regimen (carmustine/etoposide/cytarabine/melphalan) to 65%. We compared the study population with all other concurrent patients who were eligible for the trial but instead received the BEAM regimen at our center. No patient received post-ASCT maintenance therapy. The Gem/Bu/Mel trial enrolled 80 patients with a median age of 31 years, 41% with primary refractory HL and 59% with relapsed HL (36% extranodal relapses), and 30% with positron emission tomography (PET)-positive lesions at ASCT. The concurrent BEAM (n?=?45) and Gem/Bu/Mel cohorts were well balanced except for higher rates of bulky relapse and PET-positive tumors in the Gem/Bu/Mel cohort. There were no transplantation-related deaths in either cohort. At a median follow-up of 34.5 months (range, 26 to 72 months), Gem/Bu/Mel was associated with better 2-year PFS (65% versus 51%; P?=?.008) and overall survival (89% versus 73%; P?=?.0003). In conclusion, our data show that Gem/Bu/Mel is safe, in this nonrandomized comparison yielding improved outcomes compared with a concurrently treated and prognostically matched cohort of patients with primary refractory or poor-risk relapsed HL receiving BEAM.     

Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients with Early Progression of Follicular Lymphoma: A Follow-Up Study of 2 Randomized Trials from the German Low Grade Lymphoma Study Group

Patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) and progression of disease (POD) within 24 months after frontline treatment (POD24) have poor overall survival (OS). The optimal salvage treatment for these patients is unknown. We assessed the role of high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in transplant-eligible patients. We analyzed 162 patients with advanced-stage FL who had received frontline treatment within the GLSG1996 or GLSG2000 trials. All patients had POD at age ≤ 65 years and had not received a prior transplant. Second-line treatment was not specified by study protocols. Survival was calculated from time of second-line treatment. Eighteen patients (11%) progressed (n?=?16) or died (n?=?2) during cytoreductive second-line treatment (considered “cytoreduction failure”); none received ASCT, and their median second-line OS was <1 year. A total of 113 patients had POD24 (70%), whereas 49 had POD after 24 months (30%). Sixty-three patients without cytoreduction failure received ASCT (39%), and 81 received no transplant (50%). In patients with POD24, a significant survival benefit was associated with ASCT with a 5-year second-line progression-free survival for ASCT versus no transplant of 51% versus 19% (hazard ratio, .38; 95% confidence interval, .24 to .62; P?<?.0001) and a 5-year second-line OS of 77% versus 59% (hazard ratio, .54, 95% confidence interval, .30 to .95; P?=?.031). Thus, ASCT is an effective treatment option for transplant-eligible patients with high-risk FL as identified by POD24 and should be evaluated in prospective clinical trials.     

The Impact of Advanced Patient Age on Mortality after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Retrospective Study by the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Lymphoma Working Party

More than 60% of patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) are age >60 years at presentation. The purpose of this study was to compare the potential risks and benefits of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) in elderly patients with NHL with younger patients in a large sample, also taking into account comorbidity information. All patients age ≥18 years who had undergone alloHCT from a matched sibling or unrelated donor for NHL between 2003 and 2013 and were registered with the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation were eligible for the study. The primary study endpoint was 1-year nonrelapse mortality (NRM). A total of 3919 patients were eligible and were categorized by age: young (Y), 18 to 50 y (n?=?1772); middle age (MA), 51 to 65 y (n?=?1967); or old (O), 66 to 77 y (n?=?180). Follicular lymphoma was present in 37% of the patients; diffuse large B cell lymphoma, in 30%; mantle cell lymphoma, in 21%, and peripheral T cell lymphoma, in 11%. At the time of alloHCT, 85% of the patients were chemosensitive and 15% were chemorefractory. With a median follow-up of 4.5 years in survivors, NRM at 1 year was 13% for the Y group. 20% for the MA group, and 33% for the O group (P <.001), whereas relapse incidence and overall survival (OS) at 3 years in the 3 groups were 30%, 31%, and 28% (P?=?.355) and 60%, 54%, and 38% (P <.001), respectively. Multivariable adjustment for confounders, including sex, NHL subset, time from diagnosis, chemosensitivity, donor, and conditioning, confirmed older age as a significant predictor for NRM and OS, but not for relapse risk. Although comorbidity was a significant predictor of NRM in a subset analysis restricted to the 979 patients with comorbidity information available, age retained its significant impact on NRM. In conclusion, our data show that alloHCT in patients age >65 y provides similar NHL control as seen in younger patients but is associated with a higher NRM that is not fully explained by comorbidity. Thus, although alloHCT is feasible and effective in very old patients, the increased NRM risk must be taken into account when assessing the indication for alloHCT for NHL in this age group.     

Total Body Irradiation Is Safe and Similarly Effective as Chemotherapy-Only Conditioning in Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) consolidation has become a standard approach for patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), yet there is little consensus on the role of total body irradiation (TBI) as part of high-dose transplantation conditioning. We analyzed 75 consecutive patients with MCL who underwent ASCT at our institution between 2001 and 2011 with either TBI-based (n?=?43) or carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan (BEAM; n?=?32) high-dose conditioning. Most patients (97%) had chemosensitive disease and underwent transplantation in first remission (89%). On univariate analysis, TBI conditioning was associated with a trend toward improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR], .53; 95% confidence interval [CI], .28-1.00; P?=?.052) and similar OS (HR, .59; 95% CI, .26-1.35; P?=?.21), with a median follow-up of 6.3 years in the TBI group and 6.6 years in the BEAM group. The 5-year PFS was 66% in the TBI group versus 52% in the BEAM group; OS was 82% versus 68%, respectively. However, on multivariate analysis, TBI-based conditioning was not significantly associated with PFS (HR, .57; 95% CI .24-1.34; P?=?.20), after controlling for age, disease status at ASCT, and receipt of post-transplantation rituximab maintenance. Likewise, early toxicity, nonrelapse mortality, and secondary malignancies were similar in the 2 groups. Our data suggest that both TBI and BEAM-based conditioning regimens remain viable conditioning options for patients with MCL undergoing ASCT.