Persistence of posttraumatic stress in violently injured youth seen in the emergency department

OBJECTIVE: To determine if symptoms of posttraumatic stress, initially evaluated in the emergency department (ED) setting, persist over time. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Two urban, academic medical center EDs. PATIENTS: Sixty-nine injured patients, aged 12 to 24 years, were assessed for acute posttraumatic stress symptoms at the time of their enrollment in an ongoing ED-based study of intentional youth violence, and assessed for posttraumatic stress symptoms up to 5 months later. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Immediate Stress Reaction Checklist, administered during the ED visit, and the Symptom Checklist of the Child and Adolescent Trauma Survey, administered during routine telephone follow-up. RESULTS: Patients in the emergency department reported a range of acute stress symptoms on the Immediate Stress Reaction Checklist, with 25% reporting clinically significant distress. On follow-up assessment, 15% reported significant posttraumatic stress symptoms. The severity of acute stress symptoms was strongly associated with the severity of posttraumatic stress symptoms at follow-up (r = 0.55, P<.005). Age, sex, injury type, and time from injury to follow-up were not associated with the degree of acute stress or posttraumatic stress symptom severity at initial or follow-up assessment. CONCLUSION: This study provides preliminary evidence that acute stress symptoms, assessed in the ED in the immediate aftermath of a traumatic injury, are useful indicators of risk for later posttraumatic stress.     

Primary care and emergency department decision making.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of primary care status on decision making in the pediatric emergency department (ED). SETTING: Urban tertiary care children's hospital. DESIGN: Examining physicians prospectively completed questionnaires describing the presence of and their familiarity with patients' primary care providers (PCPs), as well as several relevant clinical factors. PATIENTS: We prospectively surveyed care for patients with triage temperature of 38.5 degrees C or higher or symptoms of gastroenteritis between August 1, 1999, and February 15, 2000. OUTCOME MEASURES: Intravenous fluid use, hospital admission status, rates of diagnostic testing and interventions, mean total costs, and length of ED stay. RESULTS: Among 1166 nonreferred patients, no PCP was identified for 164 patients and PCPs for 1002. The groups did not differ on ethnicity, mean age-adjusted vital signs, triage category, initial appearance, patient care setting (main ED or urgent care clinic), time of day, day of week, certainty of diagnosis, or perceived importance of follow-up. Mean unadjusted direct hospital costs for diagnostic testing were significantly higher for the group without PCPs, $23 vs $16. In regression models controlling for age, ethnicity, insurance status, patient care setting, ED attending physician, temperature, and initial appearance, the absence of a PCP was associated with an increased likelihood of diagnostic testing. Compared with a subset of the cohort with PCPs who were familiar to the treating physicians, the group without PCPs also had a significantly higher rate of intravenous fluid administration. CONCLUSION: In this patient population, ED physicians may vary their assessment and management decisions based on primary care status.     

The art of communication: strategies to improve efficiency, quality of care and patient safety in the emergency department

The practice of pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) has been supported by wonderful advancements in diagnostic testing, particularly in medical imaging. One of the most remarkable has been CT, which has arguably become our most valuable diagnostic tool in the emergency department (ED). PEM specialists have grown increasingly aware of quality and safety concerns in the care of children in emergency medical settings, spurred in part by a rapid growth in ED utilization and significant overcrowding. In the midst of this comes the revelation that one of our most valued diagnostic tools might place our youngest patients at a significant risk for the development of fatal cancer. This article reinforces the fundamental importance of communication and teamwork as a means to promote patient care quality and safety in the ED, and it offers partnership strategies for PEM and pediatric radiology specialists to consider as they address these important concerns.     

Developing the painless emergency department: A systematic approach to change

Pain has been thought to be an unfortunate but inevitable part of the disease process. The treatment of pain has often been considered secondary to the diagnosis and treatment of the disease process or injury responsible for the pain. This report presents a systematic approach to the elimination of pain in children presenting to the emergency department. Through a process of cultural change, education, protocol initiation, and technological advancement, the painless emergency department can become a reality.     

The activities of a pediatric emergency department. The emergency problems]

The authors reviewed records of admission at the Fist Ais-Emergency Service of "G. Gaslini" Children's Hospital, data referring both to in and outpatients. First of all we took into account epidemiological data analysing occurrence and types of diseases; at the same time a demographic study, which aimed to show a decrease in the child population in Genova, was performed. Secondly we compared these data with the real number of admitted patients: collected data showed that this service has been used excessively.     

A practical approach to warts in the emergency department

Although cutaneous warts are one of the most common skin conditions affecting children, their management can be challenging, especially in complex cases and even more so during a single emergency department encounter. Anogenital warts require particular attention because of their possible but nonspecific association with sexual abuse. This review will focus on cutaneous warts and anogenital warts, with a discussion of their recognition and treatment, especially in the emergency department. The medicolegal implications of anogenital warts in children are also reviewed.     

Patient- and family-centered care and the role of the emergency physician providing care to a child in the emergency department

Patient- and family-centered care is an approach to health care that recognizes the role of the family in providing medical care; encourages collaboration between the patient, family, and health care professionals; and honors individual and family strengths, cultures, traditions, and expertise. Although there are many opportunities for providing patient- and family-centered care in the emergency department, there are also challenges to doing so. The American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Emergency Physicians support promoting patient dignity, comfort, and autonomy; recognizing the patient and family as key decision-makers in the patient's medical care; recognizing the patient's experience and perspective in a culturally sensitive manner; acknowledging the interdependence of child and parent as well as the pediatric patient's evolving independence; encouraging family-member presence; providing information to the family during interventions; encouraging collaboration with other health care professionals; acknowledging the importance of the patient's medical home; and encouraging institutional policies for patient- and family-centered care.     

Dental concerns unrelated to trauma in the pediatric emergency department: barriers to care

OBJECTIVES: To describe patients with nontraumatic dental problems treated in our pediatric emergency department (PED) and to determine if barriers to access prompted seeking care in the PED rather than from a dentist or dental clinic. DESIGN: Questionnaire administered to a convenience sample of patients with nontraumatic dental complaints. SETTING: An urban PED. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Insurance status, primary medical and dental care, duration of symptoms, diagnosis, and reason for seeking care in the PED. RESULTS: Two hundred patients were enrolled. Median age was 17 years (range, 1-22 years). Forty-five percent were African American. Forty-nine percent had Medicaid. Fifty percent identified a regular dentist, whereas 71% had a primary care physician. Thirty-four percent of patients 4 years and older had not seen a dentist in more than a year. Children younger than 13 years were more likely than teenagers to identify a regular dentist (odds ratio [OR] = 2.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-6.1). Those with a regular medical provider were more likely to have a regular dentist (OR = 7.7; 95% CI, 3.4-18). The most common reasons for not going to a dentist were as follows: dentist closed, 34%; lack of dental insurance or money, 17%; and lack of a dentist, 16%. Patients with symptoms for more than 72 hours were more likely to cite lack of a dentist as their reason for coming to the PED (OR = 7.4; 95% CI, 1.9-33). CONCLUSIONS: Many pediatric patients do not have regular dental care, and this is associated with a lack of primary medical care. Access barriers to acute dental care include lack of insurance or funds, lack of a dentist, and limited hours of dental care sites. Improved insurance reimbursement, active enrollment of adolescents into preventive dental care, and expansion of provider hours may limit PED dental visits and improve the health of patients.     

Patient misidentification in a pediatric emergency department: patient safety and legal perspectives

Emergency departments across the nation are faced with ever-increasing high volumes, overcrowding, and patient acuity. Along with these growing trends, the Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations is instituting new patient safety initiatives to reduce patient medical errors in the hospital setting. The emergency department is one area under great scrutiny with patient identification as primary concern. This article discusses a case study involving patient misidentification in the pediatric emergency department and reviews the legal and safety programs implemented at a children's hospital to improve patient safety outcomes.     

A pediatric emergency department follow-up system: completing the cycle of care.

BACKGROUND: Prior to 1993, the follow-up program for our pediatric emergency department (ED) was the responsibility of the rotating senior pediatric resident. There were inherent problems with this system, as a consequence of inconsistent personnel. The residents' revolving schedules and the fact that they were accountable to other clinical areas decreased their availability for follow-up. Also, it was difficult for the clerical staff to identify the person responsible for answering parent calls. The medical director of the ED made the decision to turn the core responsibility for the follow-up program to the nurse practitioners in addition to their direct care provider role. The nurse practitioner group is a consistent member of the treatment team who has the critical thinking skills necessary to handle the majority of issues that require follow-up. The emergency attending physicians are available for consultation whenever questions arise. OBJECTIVE: Review of current follow-up program of a pediatric ED and its impact on patient care, patient/parent satisfaction, and communication with community providers and specialists. METHOD: A retrospective review of the evolution of the multi-faceted follow-up of patients from an urban pediatric ED. RESULTS: Antidotal evidence suggests that a comprehensive follow-up program increases patient satisfaction, improves communication between the ED, primary care providers, and specialists. It also decreases the workload of the attending emergency physicians, allowing them more time to focus on acute issues. In addition, the follow-up program for ED patients can decrease the medical /legal risks associated with reporting of delayed laboratory results. CONCLUSION: The next step in further reviewing this program is the development of a satisfaction questionnaire for patient/ families and community providers to quantify their level of satisfaction with the program. A retrospective chart review of the patients who received a follow-up phone call after discharge, and the return visit rate would be another avenue to pursue to validate our antidotal information.     

Family-centered bedside rounds: a new approach to patient care and teaching

The importance of patient-centered care and the role of families in decision-making are becoming more recognized. Starting with a single acute care unit, a multidisciplinary improvement team at Cincinnati Children's Hospital developed and implemented a new process that allows families to decide if they want to be part of attending-physician rounds. Family involvement seems to improve communication, shares decision-making, and offers new learning for residents and students. Despite initial concerns of staff members, family-centered rounds has been widely accepted and spread throughout the institution. Here we report our experiences as a potential model to improve family-centered care and teaching.