Hepatocellular carcinoma ≤ 4 cm treated with radiofrequency ablation with or without percutaneous ethanol injection

Background. To compare the survival of Chinese cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ≤ 4 cm who underwent radiofrequency ablation (RFA) alone or a combination of RFA with percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI).Material and methods. Retrospective analysis was performed for 681 cases with HCC ≤ 4 cm who were treated with RFA alone or RFA combined with PEI (RFA + PEI) between 2004 and 2011.Results. As a result, 180 patients in each group were selected after propensity score matching (PSM). Higher overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were achieved by RFA + PEI compared with RFA alone (P = 0.019 and 0.009, respectively). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year cumulative OS rates were 78.0, 44.4, and 30.1% for patients in RFA group and 88.2, 58.0, and 41.1% for patients in RFA + PEI group, respectively. Besides, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year cumulative RFS rates were 77.0, 43.8, and 29.2% in RFA group, and 87.9, 57.6, and 38.4% in RFA + PEI group, respectively. The local recurrence, complete ablation and five-year mortality showed no distinct differences between RFA and RFA + PEI groups in three subgroups classified with tumor size. Moreover, Cox regression multivariate analysis results showed that sex and treatment approach were significantly related to OS, whereas sex, status of HBsAg, local recurrence, and number of tumor nodule were related to RFS.Conclusion. Therefore, the combination of RFA and PEI yielded better OS and RFS rates than RFA alone for Chinese patients with HCC ≤ 4 cm.     

Radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta analysis

AIM:To evaluate survival and recurrence after radiofrequency ablation(RFA) for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) using a meta-analysis.METHODS:Literature on RFA vs surgical resection for the treatment of small HCC published between January 1990 and December 2008 was retrieved.A metaanalysis was conducted to estimate pooled survival and recurrence ratios.A fixed or random effect model was established to collect the data.RESULTS:The differences in overall survival at 1-year,3-years and at e...     

Intraoperative radiofrequency thermal ablation combined with portal vein infusion chemotherapy and transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable HCC

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We conducted a preliminary study to determine the feasibility of therapy consisting of intraoperative radiofrequency thermal ablation combined with portal vein infusion chemotherapy and transarterial chemoembolization (IRFAPA) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODOLOGY: Between September 2001 and June 2004, 34 patients with unresectable HCC were enrolled into a prospective study. 18 cases underwent IRFAPA (group I and 16 cases underwent percutaneous RF ablation (PRFA, group II). Patients' outcomes for IRFAPA and PRFA were recorded and compared. RESULTS: Patients undergoing IRFAPA or PRFA were similar in age, liver function, tumor size, serum AFP, distribution of tumor, mortality, complication and complete ablation rates. In five patients in group II seven new lesions were found during operation. The rate of distant intrahepatic recurrence between the two groups had differences (11.1% vs. 50.0%, P=0.023) although the cumulative recurrence-free survival between the two groups had no differences (P=0.7808). There was a significant difference in the overall survival (P=0.0407). The 1-year and 3-year cumulative overall survival rate was 87.5% and 73.3%, 52.2% and 20.4% in group I and group II, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: IRFAPA is an effective and safe procedure for unresectable HCC. IRFAPA is preferred to PRFA therapy if the patients' conditions can tolerate laparotomy.     

Comparison of prognosis by viral etiology in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation

Background. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been performed as a first line curative treatment modality for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) within the Milan criteria currently. However, prognosis of hepatitis B- and hepatitis C-related HCC after RFA remains debatable. This study aimed to assess the impact of viral etiology on the prognosis of HCC patients undergoing RFA.Material and methods. One hundred and ninety-two patients with positive serum HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) and negative serum antibody against HCV (anti-HCV) were enrolled as the B-HCC group and 165 patients with negative serum HBsAg and positive anti-HCV as the C-HCC group. Post-RFA prognoses were compared between the two groups using multivariate and propensity score matching analyses.Results. The B-HCC group had higher male-to-female ratio and better liver functional reserve than the C-HCC group. After a median follow-up of 23.0 ± 22.7 months, 55 patients died and 189 patients had tumor recurrence after RFA. The cumulative five-year survival rate was 75.9% and 69.5% in the B-HCC and C-HCC groups, respectively (p = 0.312), while the five-year recurrence-free survival rate was 19.0% and 26.6%, respectively (p = 0.490). After propensity-score matching, the B-HCC group still had comparable overall survival rate (p = 0.679) and recurrence-free survival rate (p = 0.689) to the C-HCC group. For 132 patients with Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer stage 0, the five-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival rates were also comparable between the two groups (p = 0.559 and p = 0.872, respectively).Conclusion. Viral etiology is not essential for determining outcome in HCC patients undergoing RFA.     

Impact of diabetes on recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after surgical treatment in patients with viral hepatitis

OBJECTIVES: Consensus has been reached that diabetes is a risk factor for development of HCC, but the impact on postoperative recurrence is still controversial. To clarify this point, we analyzed the relationship of postoperative recurrence rate of HCC and coexistence of diabetes in the patients with viral hepatitis. METHODS: A total of 90 patients who had undergone curative resection for HCC were analyzed. They were divided into two groups with and without diabetes, and the recurrence-free survival rates after surgical treatment and the factors contributing to recurrence were examined. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed the recurrence-free survival rates in the diabetic group were significantly lower than those in the nondiabetic group (P= 0.005) and overall survival rates in the diabetic group were significantly lower than those in the nondiabetic group (P= 0.005). These results were emphasized in the analysis of patients infected with hepatitis C virus. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed diabetes was a significant factor contributing to HCC recurrence after treatment. Furthermore, multivariate analysis in HCC patients with diabetes showed Child-Pugh classification B (P= 0.001) and insulin therapy (P= 0.049) were significant factors contributing to HCC recurrence after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study suggest that diabetes is a risk factor for the recurrence of HCV-related HCC and decreases the overall survival rates after surgical treatment. HCV-related HCC patients with diabetes should be closely followed for postoperative recurrence.     

Hepatocellular carcinoma in the elderly:Meta-analysis and systematic literature review

AIM: To conduct a meta-analysis to investigate theclinical outcomes of surgical resection and locoregional treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) in elderly patients defined as aged 70 years or more. METHODS: Literature documenting a comparison of clinical outcomes for elderly and non elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma was identified by searching Pub Med, Ovid, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases, for those from inception to March 2015 with no limits. Dichotomous outcomes and standard meta-analysis techniques were used. Heterogeneity was tested by the Cochrane Q statistic. Pooled estimates were measured using the fixed or random effect model.RESULTS: Twenty three studies were included with a total of 12482 patients. Of these patients, 6341 were treated with surgical resection, 3138 were treated with radiofrequency ablation(RFA), and 3003 were treated with transarterial chemoembolization(TACE). Of the patients who underwent surgical resection, the elderly had significantly more respiratory co-morbidities than the younger group, with both groups having a similar proportion of cardiovascular co-morbidities and diabetes. After 1 year, the elderly group had significantly increased survival rates after surgical resection compared to the younger group(OR = 0.762, 95%CI: 0.583-0.994, P = 0.045). However, the 3-year and 5-year survival outcomes with surgical resection between the two groups were similar(OR = 0.947, 95%CI: 0.777-1.154, P = 0.67 for the third year; and OR = 1.131, 95%CI: 0.895-1.430, P = 0.304 for the fifth year). Postoperative treatment complications were similar between the elderly and younger group. The elderly group and younger group had similar survival outcomes for the first and third year after RFA(OR = 1.5, 95%CI: 0.788-2.885, P = 0.217 and OR = 1.352, 95%CI: 0.940-1.944, P = 0.104). For the fifth year, the elderly group had significantly worse survival rates compared to the younger group after RFA(OR = 1.379, 95%CI: 1.079-1.763, P = 0.01). For patients who underwent TACE, the elderly group had significantlyincreased survival compared to the younger group for the first and third year(OR = 0.664, 95%CI: 0.548-0.805, P = 0.00 and OR = 0.795, 95%CI: 0.663-0.953, P = 0.013). At the fifth year, there were no significant differences in overall survival between the elderly group and younger group(OR = 1.256, 95%CI: 0.806-1.957, P = 0.313). CONCLUSION: The optimal management strategy for elderly patients with HCC is dependent on patient and tumor characteristics. Compared to patients less than 70, elderly patients have similar three year survival after resection and ablation and an improved three year survival after TACE. At five years, elderly patients had a lower survival after ablation but similar survival with resection and TACE as compared to younger patients. Heterogeneity of patient populations and selection bias can explain some of these findings. Overall, elderly patients have similar success, if not better, with these treatments and should be considered for all treatments after assessment of their clinical status and cancer burden.     

Clinical outcome of small hepatocellular carcinoma after different treatments:A meta-analysis

AIM:To compare clinical outcomes between surgical resection(RES)and nonsurgical-RES(nRES)ablation therapies for small hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).METHODS:MEDLINE,Embase and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for studies of RES and nRES treatments for small HCC between January 2003 and October 2013.The clinical outcome measures evaluated included overall survival rate,disease-free survival rate,adverse events,and local recurrence rate.Odds ratios(ORs)with 95%CIs were calculated using either the fixed effects model or random effects model.Theχ2 and I2 tests were calculated to assess the heterogeneity of the data.Funnel plots were used to assess the risk of publication bias.RESULTS:Our analysis included 12 studies that consisted of a total of 1952 patients(RES vs nRES),five studies that consisted of 701 patients[radiofrequency ablation(RFA)vs percutaneous ethanol injection(PEI)],and five additional studies[RFA vs RFA+transcatheter arterial chemoembolization(TACE)]that all addressed the treatment of small HCC.For cases of RES vs nRES,there was no significant difference in the 1-year(OR=0.99,95%CI:0.87-1.12,P=0.85)or 3-year(OR=0.97,95%CI:0.84-1.11,P=0.98)overall survival rate;however,there was a significant increase in the RES group in the 5-year overall survival rate(OR=0.81,95%CI:0.68-0.95,P=0.01).The 1-year(OR=0.94,95%CI:0.82-1.08,P=0.37)and 5-year(OR=0.99,95%CI:0.85-1.14,P=0.85)disease-free survival rates showed no significant differences between the two groups.The3-year disease-free survival rate(OR=0.81,95%CI:0.69-0.96;P=0.02)was higher in the RES group.For cases of RFA vs PEI,our data analysis indicated that RFA treatment was associated with significantly higher2-year(OR=0.76,95%CI:0.58-0.99,P=0.043)and3-year(OR=0.73,95%CI:0.54-0.98,P=0.039)overall survival rates;however,there were no significant differences in the 1-year(OR=0.92,95%CI:0.72-1.17,P=0.0502)overall survival rate or incidence of adverse events(OR=1.84,95%CI:0.76-4.45,P=0.173).For cases of RFA vs RFA+TACE,there were no significant differences in the 1-year(OR=1.17,95%CI:0.88-1.56,P=0.27)or 3-year(OR=1.25,95%CI:0.90-1.73,P=0.183)overall survival rate;however,the 5-year overall survival rate(OR=3.19,95%CI:1.51-6.74,P=0.002)in patients treated by RFA+TACE was higher than that treated by RFA alone.CONCLUSION:Surgical resection is superior to nonsurgical ablation for the treatment of small HCC.Among the studies analyzed,RFA is the most efficacious single nonsurgical ablation treatment.     

Radiofrequency ablation versus percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy for small hepatocellular carcinomas: a retrospective comparative study

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although local ablation procedures are useful in eradication treatment for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), there have only been a few clinical studies comparing the response to radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy (PMCT). We evaluated the clinical effect and safety of these two procedures for the treatment of small HCCs measuring 2cm or less in diameter. METHODOLOGY: Twenty-four patients with HCC who were treated by RFA and were compared with 39 patients with HCC who underwent PMCT. These procedures were repeated until complete tumor necrosis was achieved. The therapeutic and adverse effects were retrospectively compared between the two procedures. RESULTS: (1) There were significantly fewer treatment sessions (P < 0.001) in the RFA group than the PMCT group, and the necrotic area was significantly larger (P < 0.001) in the former group. (2) The local recurrence rate was significantly lower (P = 0.012) after RFA than after PMCT, even though the ectopic recurrence rate showed no significant difference. 3) The cumulative survival rate was significantly higher (P = 0.028) in the RFA group. (4) The incidence of pain and fever after treatment was significantly higher after PMCT than after RFA. Bile duct injury and pleural effusion were also more frequent in the PMCT group. CONCLUSIONS: RFA is more useful than PMCT in the treatment of small HCCs because it is minimally invasive and achieves a low local recurrence rate, high survival rate, and extensive necrosis after only a few treatment sessions.     

Evaluation of transcatheter arterial embolization prior to percutaneous tumor ablation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) may reduce the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence when performed before percutaneous tumor ablation (PTA), either percutaneous ethanol injection therapy (PEIT) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA). We conducted a randomized, controlled trial comparing the use of TAE combined with percutaneous ethanol injection therapy (TAE/PEIT) to the use of PEIT only to assess the effects on HCC recurrence and survival. We continued the study after the introduction of RFA and compared TAE combined with RFA (TAE/RFA) with RFA only. METHODS: Between March 1997 and April 2001, 42 HCC patients were enrolled who satisfied the following inclusion criteria: (1) uninodular HCC as determined by angiography under computed tomography, (2) arterial hypervascularity, and (3) no prior history of HCC treatment. Twenty-two patients were treated with TAE/PTA (PEIT, 12; RFA, 10) and 20 patients with PTA only (PEIT, 14; RFA, 6). RESULTS: There were four cases of local recurrence in the PTA-only group and none in the TAE/PTA group (P=0.043). The four patients with local recurrence were treated with PEIT. None of the patients treated with RFA showed local recurrence. The effect of TAE on overall recurrence was not significant (P=0.4179). In the multivariate analysis, prior TAE was not significant for survival (P=0.514). CONCLUSIONS: TAE has a limited use in suppressing local recurrence when performed before PEIT but not before RFA.     

Risk factors for the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with hepatitis C

AIM: To analyze the risk factors of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) treatment with HCV-associated hepatitis. METHODS: Twenty-six patients with HCV-associated HCC who were followed-up for more than 12 mo were selected for this study. Risk factors for distant intrahepatic recurrences of HCC were evaluated for patients in whom complete coagulation was achieved without recurrence in the same subsegment as the primary nodule.Twelve clinical and tumoral factors were examined: Age, gender, nodule diameter, number of primary HCC nodule, Child-Pugh classification, serum platelet, serum albumin, serum AST, post RFA AST, serum ALT, post RFA ALT, post RFA treatment. RESULTS: Distant recurrences of HCC in remnant liver after RFA were observed in 14 cases and in the number of primary HCC nodules (P = 0.047), and the serum platelets (P = 0.030), the clear difference came out by the recurrence group and the non-recurrence group. The cumulative recurrence rates after 1 and 2 years were 30.8% and 86.8%, respectively for primary multinodular HCC, and 15.4% and 29.5% respectively, for primary uninodular HCC. In addition the 1-year recurrence rates for patients with serum albumin more than 3.4 g/dL and less than 3.4 g/dL were 23.1% for both, but the 2-years recurrence rates were 89.0% and 23.1%, respectively. The number of primary HCC nodules (relative risk, 6.970; P = 0.016) were found to be a statistically significant predictor for poor distant intrahepatic recurrence by univariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Patients who have multiple HCC nodules, low serum platelets and low serum albumin accompanied by HCV infection, should be carefully followed because of the high incidence of new HCC lesions in the remnant liver, even if coagulation RFA is complete.     

规范性个体化射频消融术在原发性肝癌外科治疗中的作用

目的探讨规范性个体化的射频消融术在原发性肝癌外科治疗中的作用。方法对2004年6月至2012年6月间562例行射频消融术的原发性肝癌病例进行回顾性分析,并与同期行肝部分切除术的574例病例进行对照研究。观察术后恢复、手术并发症、术后肿瘤残余复发、术后总体生存率和术后无瘤生存率等。结果两组均无手术死亡病例,术后均恢复出院。术后平均住院日和平均住院费用射频消融组显著低于手术切除组(P0.001,P=0.041),术后射频消融组无严重并发症,肝功能损害主要为轻中度,损害程度显著低于手术切除组(P0.001)。术后1个月手术切除组无肿瘤残留,射频消融组23例共41个瘤灶发现肿瘤残留。两组术后1、3、5年总体生存率无差异,手术切除组术后1、3、5年无瘤生存率显著高于射频消融组(P=0.024)。结论射频消融能够完全毁损肿瘤实质,且术后恢复快,并发症少,治疗得当可达到与手术切除相近的治疗效果,但其术后无瘤生存率低于手术切除,因此规范性个体化的手术方案设计是提高射频消融治疗原发性肝癌近远期疗效的关键因素。     

Repeated radiofrequency ablation for management of patients with cirrhosis with small hepatocellular carcinomas: a long-term cohort study

In most patients with cirrhosis, successful percutaneous ablation or surgical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is followed by recurrence. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has proven effective for treating HCC nodules, but its repeatability in managing recurrences and the impact of this approach on survival has not been evaluated. To this end, we retrospectively analyzed a prospective series of 706 patients with cirrhosis (Child-Pugh class ≤ B7) who underwent RFA for 859 HCC ≤ 35 mm in diameter (1-2 per patient). The results of RFA were classified as complete responses (CRs) or treatment failures. CRs were obtained in 849 nodules (98.8%) and 696 patients (98.5%). During follow-up (median, 29 months), 465 (66.8%) of the 696 patients with CRs experienced a first recurrence at an incidence rate of 41 per 100 person-years (local recurrence 6.2; nonlocal 35). Cumulative incidences of first recurrence at 3 and 5 years were 70.8% and 81.7%, respectively. RFA was repeated in 323 (69.4%) of the 465 patients with first recurrence, restoring disease-free status in 318 (98.4%) cases. Subsequently, RFA was repeated in 147 (65.9%) of the 223 patients who developed a second recurrence after CR of the first, restoring disease-free status in 145 (98.6%) cases. Overall, there were 877 episodes of recurrence (1-8 per patient); 577 (65.8%) of these underwent RFA that achieved CRs in 557 (96.5%) cases. No procedure-related deaths occurred in 1,921 RFA sessions. Estimated 3- and 5-year overall and disease-free (after repeated RFAs) survival rates were 67.0% and 40.1% and 68.0 and 38.0%, respectively. CONCLUSION: RFA is safe and effective for managing HCC in patients with cirrhosis, and its high repeatability makes it particularly valuable for controlling intrahepatic recurrences.     

Single hepatocellular carcinoma ≤ 3 cm in left lateral segment: Liver resection or radiofrequency ablation?

AIM:To evaluate the long-term results of radiofrequency ablation(RFA)compared to left lateral sectionectomy(LLS)in patients with Child-Pugh class A disease for the treatment of single and small hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)in the left lateral segments.METHODS:We retrospectively reviewed the data of133 patients with single HCC(≤3 cm)in their left lateral segments who underwent curative LLS(n=66)or RFA(n=67)between 2006 and 2010.RESULTS:The median follow-up period was 33.5mo in the LLS group and 29 mo in the RFA group(P=0.060).Most patients had hepatitis B virus-related HCC.The hospital stay was longer in the LLS group than in the RFA group(8 d vs 2 d,P<0.001).The 1-,2-,and 3-year disease-free survival and overall survival rates were 80.0%,68.2%,and 60.0%,and 95.4%,92.3%,and 92.3%,respectively,for the LLS group;and 80.8%,59.9%,and 39.6%,and 98.2%,92.0%,and 74.4%,respectively,for the RFA group.The disease-free survival curve and overall survival curve were higher in the LLS group than in the RFA group(P=0.012 and P=0.013,respectively).Increased PIVKA-Ⅱlevels and small tumor size were associated with HCC recurrence in multivariate analysis.CONCLUSION:Liver resection is suitable for single HCC≤3 cm in the left lateral segments.     

Efficacy of combination therapy with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma

Abstract

Objectives: Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the standard therapy for patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to determine whether combination therapy with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and TACE was superior to TACE monotherapy for intermediate-stage HCC and identify cases in which this technique was the most effective.

Materials and methods: We selected patients with intermediate HCC who met the following eligibility criteria: (1) ≥ 20 years of age, (2) receiving initial therapy, (3) ≤7 tumors, and (4) maximum tumor diameter <5?cm. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) using potential confounding factors. We retrospectively compared the cumulative overall survival rate and recurrence-free survival rate between the TACE?+?RFA and TACE groups. Additionally, a sub-group analysis was performed for preoperative factors.

Results: Among the 103 patients, 92 were selected using PSM. The cumulative overall survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years for the TACE?+?RFA group were 97.4%, 70.4%, and 60.4%, respectively, which were significantly higher than those for the TACE group (92.7%, 55.7%, and 22.8%, respectively, p?=?.045). The recurrence-free survival rates at 0.5, 1, and 2 years for the TACE?+?RFA group were 80.0%, 58.6%, and 33.3%, respectively, which were significantly higher than those for the TACE group (34.5%, 8.8%, and 2.9%, respectively, p?p?=?.036).

Conclusions: The addition of RFA to TACE improved cumulative overall and recurrence-free survival in patients with intermediate-stage HCC, especially in patients with AFP <100.     

Clinical outcomes of radiofrequency ablation and surgical resection for small hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis

Background and Aim: To evaluate the evidence comparing radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and surgical resection (RES) on the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using meta‐analytical techniques. Methods: Literature search was undertaken until March 2011 to identify comparative studies evaluating survival rates, recurrence rates, and complications. Pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated with either the fixed or random effect model. Results: These studies included a total of 877 patients: 441 treated with RFA and 436 treated with RES. The overall survival was significantly higher in patients treated with RES than RFA at 1, 3 and 5 years (respectively: OR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.29–0.86; OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.28–0.94; OR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.45–0.84). In the RES group the 1, 3, and 5 years recurrence‐free survival rates were significantly higher than the RFA group (respectively: OR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.44–0.97; OR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.47–0.89; OR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.35–0.77). RFA had a higher rate of local recurrence (OR: 4.08, 95% CI: 2.03–8.20). For tumors ≤ 3 cm RES was better than RFA in the 3‐year overall survival rates (OR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.16–0.89). Conclusions: Surgical resection was superior to RFA in the treatment of HCC. However, the findings have to be carefully interpreted due to the lower level of evidence.     

When to Perform Surgical Resection or Radiofrequency Ablation for Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma?: A Nomogram-guided Treatment Strategy

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is indicated for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the comparative efficacy between RFA and surgical resection (SR) is inconclusive. We aim to develop a prognostic nomogram for predicting recurrence-free survival (RFS) after RFA. We also evaluate the possibility of using nomogram in improving treatment algorithm.We retrospectively enrolled 836 patients with Barcelona Clínic Liver Cancer very-early/early-stage HCC receiving SR or RFA. A visually-orientated nomogram was constructed with Cox proportional hazards model, and number and size of tumor, platelet count, albumin level, and model for end-stage liver disease score were included. The concordance index of the nomogram was 0.69.Radiofrequency ablation patients were stratified into low and high-risk groups by the median of nomogram scores. The RFS and overall survival (OS) of 2 risk groups were compared with SR patients with propensity score matching analysis. SR provided better RFS and OS compared with high-risk (nomogram score ≥9.8) RFA patients in the propensity model. The 5-year RFS rates were 36% versus 11%, whereas the 5-year OS rates were 74% versus 60% for SR and high-risk RFA groups, respectively (both P < 0.05). However, SR was associated with better RFS (5-year RFS rates 41% vs 29%), but similar OS (5-year OS rates 80% vs 81%), compared with low-risk (nomogram score <9.8) RFA patients in the propensity model (P < 0.05 and P > 0.05, respectively).In conclusion, this user-friendly nomogram offers individualized recurrence risk estimation and stratification for early HCC patients receiving curative RFA. The nomogram can be integrated into current treatment algorithm. SR should be considered the first-line treatment for high-risk patients to achieve better long-term survival.     

射频消融与无水酒精注射治疗术后复发肝细胞癌患者的疗效比较

目的对比肝细胞癌（HCC）术后复发肿瘤病灶经射频消融（RFA）与无水酒精（PEI）注射治疗的疗效,以期为临床治疗HCC肿瘤复发提供参考。方法回顾性分析2007年8月至2010年1月HCC术后单一病灶复发患者175例,分为PEI治疗101例与RFA治疗74例。所有病例治疗前后均行常规彩超和超声造影/增强CT检查,观察比较治疗次数、病灶完全灭活率及治疗并发症发生率,记录患者治疗后1、2、3年生存率。计量资料采用t检验,计数资料采用χ2检验。结果 HCC术后复发病灶,平均每例的PEI治疗次数多于RFA（P〈0.05）,PEI和RFA治疗并发症的发生率比较差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）;肿瘤直径〈2.0 cm的HCC术后复发病灶组中,PEI和RFA治疗病灶完全灭活率比较差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）,而2.0～5.0 cm HCC术后复发病灶组,PEI治疗病灶完全灭活率低于RFA,差异均有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。HCC术后复发病灶直径〈2.0 cm组中,PEI和RFA治疗术后1、2、3年生存率分别为89.1%和90.2%、69.1%和70.7%、49.1%和53.7%,两种治疗方式术后生存率比较差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）。而2.0～5.0cm组中,PEI和RFA治疗术后1、2、3年生存率分别为63.0%和84.8%、43.5%和66.7%、21.7%和45.5%,两种治疗方式术后生存率比较差异均有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论肿瘤直径小于2.0 cm HCC术后复发病灶的RFA和PEI局部消融治疗,患者术后的生存率无明显差异,而肿瘤直径2.0～5.0 cm时,RFA治疗后生存期优于PEI。     

Laparoscopic liver resection versus percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for small hepatocellular carcinoma

BackgroundLaparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) play central roles to treat early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, ≤3 cm, 1–3 nodules, and no macrovascular involvement), although data are lacking regarding whether LLR or RFA is preferable. This study aimed to compare outcomes of both treatments for small HCCs.MethodsTreatment outcomes of small HCCs were compared between all the minor LLRs performed between 2005 and 2016 and RFAs performed between 2011 and 2016 at Kyoto University.ResultsA total of 85 and 136 patients underwent LLR and RFA, respectively. Patients that underwent LLR had higher incidence of blood transfusions, complications, and longer hospital stay. Overall and disease-specific survival rates were similar between LLR and RFA; however, recurrence-free (49.2% vs. 22.1% at 3-year) and local recurrence-free survival rates (94.9% vs. 63.6% at 3-year) were higher after LLR. Multivariate analyses identified that multiple nodules and 65-year-old and above are predictors of disease-specific survival, and that RFA is a predictor of recurrence and local recurrence.ConclusionRFA is less invasive, although both LLR and RFA are safe and effective. LLR provides better local control with superior recurrence-free and local-recurrence free survival. These results help optimize treatment selection based on patient-specific factors.     

Antiviral therapy after non-surgical tumor ablation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma associated with hepatitis C virus

BACKGROUND: Antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has led to a reduction in the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The purpose of the present paper was to assess whether antiviral therapy might suppress tumor recurrence and influence overall survival in patients with HCV-related HCC who had complete ablation of nodules by non-surgical treatments. METHODS: Twenty patients with three or fewer nodules of HCV-related HCC who were treated with percutaneous tumor ablation and/or transcatheter arterial embolization received combined interferon (IFN; 3 or 5 million units of IFN alpha-2b thrice weekly) plus ribavirin (1000-1200 mg per day) therapy for 24-48 weeks after complete ablation of lesions. During the same period, an additional 40 age- and sex-matched control patients with similar characteristics of tumors (sizes, numbers and treatment modalities) and severity of liver disease were recruited from the HCC database. Both recurrence-free survival and actuarial survival were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 20 patients, 16 completed therapy and 10 showed a sustained response with normalization of alanine aminotransferase and negative HCV-RNA at 6 months after therapy completion. Due to severe side-effects experienced by Child B patients, who mostly discontinued antiviral therapy, clinical outcome was analyzed in the Child A treated (n = 16) and control (n = 33) patients. There was no significant difference in the incidence of local recurrence in sustained responders compared with non-responders or control patients (P = 0.174, 0.1284, respectively); but the second recurrence-free interval in the sustained responders was significantly longer than that of non-responders and the control group (P = 0.0141, 0.0243, respectively). Survival in sustained responders was better than in non-responders and control patients (P = 0.0691, 0.0554, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that successful antiviral therapy after non-surgical tumor ablation for HCV-related HCC may lower tumor recurrence rate and prolong survival.     

Comparison of therapeutic effects between radiofrequency ablation and percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy for small hepatocellular carcinomas

Background:  Although thermal ablation therapies have gained fairly wide acceptance as an effective treatment for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), there have been only a few clinical studies comparing the response to radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy (PMCT). We evaluated the therapeutic efficacy and safety of these two procedures for the treatment of small HCC measuring ≤ 2 cm in diameter.
Methods:  Thirty-four patients who had 37 nodules were treated by RFA and were compared with 49 patients (56 nodules) who underwent PMCT. Treatment was repeated until complete tumor necrosis was confirmed by contrast computed tomography (CT) scanning. The therapeutic efficacy and complications were retrospectively compared between the two procedures.
Results:  (i) There were significantly fewer treatment sessions ( P  < 0.001) in the RFA group than in the PMCT group, but the necrotic area was significantly larger ( P  < 0.001) in the former group. (ii) The local recurrence rate was significantly lower ( P  = 0.031) after RFA than after PMCT, although the ectopic recurrence rate showed no significant difference. (iii) The cumulative survival rate was significantly higher ( P  = 0.018) after RFA than after PMCT. (iv) The incidence of pain and fever after treatment was significantly higher in the PMCT group. Bile duct injury, pleural effusion, and ascites were also significantly more common in the PMCT group.
Conclusions:  RFA is more useful than PMCT for the treatment of small HCC because it is minimally invasive and achieves a low local recurrence rate, high survival rate, and extensive necrosis after only a few treatment sessions.