Digital distal lower limb angiography: comparison of selective iliac injection with vasodilators and bolus chasing technique

From October 1992 to May 1993 we carried out a prospective study on 30 patients, mean age 70 years, suffering from lower limb ischaemia (mild, n = 12; moderate, n = 9; severe, n = 9). Four masked investigators compared the outcome of two techniques for the preoperative evaluation of distal vessels of the lower limbs. The reference technique was digital subtraction angiography (DSA) with selective iliac injection, fixed centring on one ankle, and use so vasodilators. The new method was DSA with the so-called bolus chasing technique: after an injection above the aortic bifurcation, an acquisition during a continuous longitudinal translation movement allows all the arteries of the lower limbs to be visualised down to the most distal point. Both techniques are well tolerated and we found no significant difference in the number of distal arteries seen with the two methods. To assess the permeability of the distal lower limb network, the bolus tracking technique is as informative as an iliac selective injection, without its constraints. Consequently, we will routinely use it as the technique of choice. Correspondence to: R. Duvauferrier     

Moya moya disease: use of digital subtraction angiography in its diagnosis

Fourteen patients suspected of having Moya Moya disease underwent intravenous digital subtraction angiography (DSA), and the findings from nine of these patients were reviewed and analyzed. Obstruction or stenosis of the supraclinoid portion of the internal carotid artery and the proximal portions of the anterior and middle cerebral arteries was observed in all cases. Arteriography, however, was better than intravenous DSA in demonstrating Moya Moya vessels, differentiating complete occlusion from severe stenosis, and demonstrating important transdural collaterals. The disadvantages of intravenous DSA included inferior spatial resolution, the need for large amounts of contrast media, and relatively high radiation doses. Since the summation of vessels cannot be avoided using DSA, arteriography is necessary for the precise evaluation of cerebral hemodynamics before bypass surgery. Intravenous DSA is a safe, reliable method for diagnosing Moya Moya disease and is suitable for the screening and follow-up examinations of patients with the disease.     

Intravenous digital subtraction angiography of arteriosclerotic vertebrobasilar disease

Intravenous digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was performed in 111 patients with vertebrobasilar ischemia. Ninety percent of the vertebral images were of diagnostic quality; 23% of the basilar images were good quality and 53% fair quality; and 58% of the posterior cerebral images were poor. Compared with selective film arteriography in 23 patients, DSA tended to underestimate the degree of atheromatous disease. Segments of the basilar artery were often poorly seen, which could result in false-negative errors. DSA can provide a general assessment of atheromatous disease of the brachiocephalic vessels, including the vertebral and carotid arteries, and in many cases can exclude occlusion or critical stenosis of the vertebrobasilar system. However, it does not adequately image the posterior cerebral or cerebellar artery.     

Clinical application of DSA and evaluation of its methods: analysis of 160 cases and review of literature

A total of 160 patients of two hospitals received 192 DSA examinations with different contrast administrations, and techniques of performing DSA were analyzed, compared, and evaluated with reference to the literature. It was concluded that (1) the peripheral injection of contrast material for IVDSA via cannula is simpler than that via a short catheter, but the incidences of contrast extravasation in both cases are higher than with central injection. (2) Both the lower part of the superior vena cava and the right atrial cavity are safe sites for central injection. With central injection for IVDSA, the arterial iodine concentration is approximately double that of peripheral injection, and consistent high quality examinations of the intracranial vessels may be obtained. However, neither peripheral nor central injections can visualize the small vessels clearly. (3) IVDSA may be substituted for conventional angiography only in examinations of the aorta and its main branches. (4) IADSA is becoming a superior angiographic technique and its clinical application is increasing. In addition, means of avoiding contrast extravasation during IVDSA and the main points of selecting the optimal technique for DSA are described in this paper.     

Intraarterial digital subtraction angiography in diagnostic arteriography

Intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was performed in 133 diagnostic arteriographic procedures during a 10-month period. The increased contrast resolution of DSA permitted the use of a dilute (15%) contrast material. A significant reduction in contrast material dose compared with conventional film-screen arteriography and intravenous DSA was thus achieved. This was especially advantageous in patients with diminished renal function. The dilute contrast material also resulted in less patient discomfort. Subtracted images were available immediately on cathode ray tube display, resulting in faster procedures, and a considerable saving in film cost compared with conventional arteriography. It is concluded that intraarterial DSA is a useful technique that may replace conventional film-screen arteriography in many applications.     

Application of blood-pool agents in visualization of peripheral vessels

Effective arterial imaging is essential in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in whom a revascularization procedure is planned. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) has traditionally been regarded as the gold standard for imaging in peripheral arterial disease, but this technique is subject to certain limitations, such as the risks of adverse reactions associated with arterial catheterization and iodinated contrast agents. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography is now recommended as an effective and useful imaging technique in peripheral arterial disease, since it offers high enhanced contrast between blood and stationary tissue and fast acquisition times. However, extracellular gadolinium contrast agents rapidly diffuse into the interstitial spaces, and thus are suitable only for first-pass imaging. This limitation can be overcome by the use of blood-pool (intravascular) contrast agents, such as gadofosveset trisodium (Vasovist, Bayer Schering Pharma AG, Berlin, Germany), which are retained within the blood vessels and hence facilitate both first-pass and steady-state imaging with high spatial resolution. Blood-pool agents, therefore, offer improved imaging, particularly of distal vessels, compared with extracellular contrast agents. Examples of first-pass and steady-state imaging with gadofosveset are presented.     

Demonstration of pedal arterial arcades in occlusive arteriosclerotic disease. Conventional and digital subtraction angiography compared

Conventional arteriography, intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA), and intravenous DSA were used in the evaluation of the patency of the pedal arterial arcades in 15 patients with advanced peripheral arteriosclerotic disease. Intraarterial DSA was found to be superior to conventional arteriography. In 12 of 15 patients, excellent or good results were achieved by intraarterial DSA compared with 5 or 15 patients examined by conventional arteriography. All intravenous DSA studies performed in 6 patients were classified as poor.     

Diabetes and peripheral arterial occlusive disease: prospective comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional digital subtraction angiography

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for identifying and evaluating arteries of the distal calf and foot in diabetic patients with severe arterial occlusive disease who will undergo distal bypass surgery. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twenty-four feet of 24 consecutive patients with diabetes and limb-threatening lower extremity ischemia were prospectively imaged using an ultrafast three-dimensional fast low-angle shot sequence on a 1.5-T MR scanner. All patients also underwent DSA of the diseased extremity within 5 days. Images were interpreted in a randomized manner by two observers in conference. Each lower extremity was divided into seven potential arterial segments. Image analysis included the detection of patent, stenosed, or occluded vessel segments. A vascular surgeon formulated treatment plans on the basis of findings from DSA and then formulated treatment plans on the basis of findings from both DSA and MR angiography. RESULTS: MR angiography was significantly better than DSA in revealing peripheral runoff vessels (p < 0.001). In nine (38%) of the 24 patients, MR angiography showed patent pedal vessels suitable for distal bypass grafting that were not revealed by DSA. Because of the results of MR angiography, treatment plans changed in seven of the nine patients in whom patent vessels were subsequently used as target vessels for distal pedal bypass grafts. CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography is superior to DSA in revealing patent vessel segments of the foot in diabetic patients with severe arterial occlusive disease. Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography should be part of the diagnostic algorithm for patients in whom pedal bypass grafting is a therapeutic option.     

Time-resolved three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the carotid artery]

Contrast-enhanced MR angiography (ceMRA) allows practical carotid arteriography without venous enhancement. However, it requires some intricate preparation such as a test bolus of the contrast agent or determination of the tracking volume even in the automatic triggering Smartprep system. The purpose of this study was to obtain carotid ceMRA without any preparation by means of a repeated multiple ultrashort three-dimensional MRA sequence (e3d56), i.e., time-resolved MRA (trMRA). Twenty-three patients underwent sagittal trMRA using a 1.0-Tesla superconducting unit. Multiple projection angiograms are acquired in three contiguous phases with a time resolution of 6 seconds per slab, including 10 partitions, after a bolus injection of 10 ml of Gd-DTPA followed by 20 ml of saline at 2 ml/sec. In all patients, the signal from the arteries could be separated from that of the veins in at least one phase. Carotid trMRA with 6-sec temporal resolution is a reliable technique for selective arteriography, avoiding the necessity of timing the contrast agent bolus.     

Aortic arch digital arteriography: an alternative technique to digital venous angiography and routine arteriography in the evaluation of cerebrovascular insufficiency

Digital arch arteriography is a technique in which the cervicocerebral vasculature is studied by injecting small amounts of contrast material (20 ml or less of diatrizoate meglumine 60%) into the aortic arch. It was used as the initial phase of arteriography in 100 patients with cerebrovascular disease. Five to ten series were obtained in various projections to evaluate the cerebrovascular system. Because suboptimal studies may be repeated, only 3% of carotid bifurcations were suboptimally visualized by digital arch arteriography as compared with 17% by film arch angiography. Intracranial vascular pathology was identified less reliably than with selective angiography. Digital arch arteriography yielded excellent studies in cases when digital venous angiography was suboptimal (20%). Digital arch arteriography may be preferable to digital venous angiography as a screening test in patients with significant cardiac or renal dysfunction because of the lower contrast load.     

Intravenous digital subtraction angiography by peripheral injection

We describe a technique for performing intravenous digital subtraction arteriography by peripheral injection and review our experience of 504 studies in 469 patients. The technique gave adequate opacification for anatomical definition of vessels in 93% of patients studied and was suitable for studies of the pulmonary arteries and left ventricle as well as the major systemic arteries. The chief causes of failure were impaired cardiac performance (2.4%) and poor patient cooperation (1.4%). Premature termination was caused by angina pectoris in 1.6% of our cases. These limitations apply also to central venous injection.     

Contrast-enhanced subtraction MR angiography in occlusive disease of the pelvic and lower limb arteries: results of a prospective intraindividual comparative study with digital subtraction angiography in 76 patients.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to evaluate the feasibility and clinical use of MR angiography (MRA) for examining the pelvic and lower limb arteries in patients with arterial occlusive disease. METHOD: Seventy-six patients with clinical signs of peripheral arterial occlusive disease were included in the study. MRA was performed using a fast contrast-enhanced high-resolution 3D technique that covered the area from the distal abdominal aorta to the distal lower limbs in two examination steps. RESULTS: In all patients, diagnostic images comparable with those of conventional intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) could be obtained. No false-negative findings were seen in the iliac, femoral, or popliteal arteries. Ten to 16% of the mild stenoses and 6-14% of the severe stenoses, mainly in the crural vessels, were overgraded compared with intraarterial DSA. Particularly in patients with proximal severe obstructions or occlusions, the crural segments could be depicted more clearly due to decreased arterial runoff in conventional angiography. CONCLUSION: The consistency of the excellent depiction of the vascular territories of the distal aorta and the pelvic and lower limb arteries in a standardized setting suggests great potential for the use of MRA in the primary diagnosis of peripheral arterial occlusive disease.     

Digital subtraction angiography of the extremities using table translation

Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) of the extremities has been performed with both intravenous and intraarterial injections of contrast material. Intravenous studies are usually site specific and are limited by contrast material load; a complete intraarterial study with multiple injections of contrast material may be time consuming. A feasibility study to evaluate a DSA technique that would allow table translation and imaging of two contiguous regions following a single injection of contrast material--bolus-chase DSA--was performed. Forty-five examinations were performed, 13 intravenously and 32 intraarterially. Twelve intravenous and 16 intraarterial DSA examinations were totally satisfactory. Inadequate studies were predominantly caused by slow arterial clearance of contrast material in the distal calf and by operator error. Compared with conventional DSA, anatomic studies of lower-extremity vessels could be obtained faster and with lower contrast material loads using bolus-chase DSA.     

Peripheral vascular disease: prospective study of intraarterial digital subtraction angiography using a 9-inch intensifier

A prospective randomized study was undertaken to evaluate the role of intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (IADSA) in the study of peripheral vascular disease. Patients underwent either conventional film-based angiography alone, digital subtraction angiography (DSA) alone, or a combined study. With a 9-inch image intensifier, DSA alone resulted in cost savings of film and contrast material but required a significantly longer examination period than the other groups and an increased iodine dose per examination. When the images were analyzed by a radiologist and a vascular surgeon, the DSA studies provided less detail in the aortoiliac region than the other techniques but had advantages in demonstrating the runoff vessels. IADSA examination should not replace conventional arteriography in patients with peripheral vascular disease but has a useful complementary role.     

Carbon dioxide contrast agent for CT arteriography: results in a porcine model

PURPOSE: To test the feasibility of carbon dioxide (CO(2))-enhanced computed tomographic (CT)-arteriography in an animal model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five domestic swine underwent digital subtraction angiography (DSA), conventional CT angiography with iodinated contrast material, and CO(2)-enhanced CT arteriography. For each CO(2)-enhanced DSA image series, 100 mL of pressurized CO(2) was injected at 1.3 bar. CT imaging was performed according to a standardized scan protocol (2 x 32 x 0.6 mm; 120 kV, 210 mAs(eff), 330 msec gantry rotation time). Iodinated contrast material was administered intravenously according to a biphasic injection protocol. For CO(2)-enhanced CT arteriography, CO(2) was administered intraarterially via a catheter placed in the juxtarenal aorta. An injection pressure of 0.65 bar (volume flow rate, 7.5 mL/sec) was applied. Images were assessed visually by two observers on a four-point grading scale. Absolute intraarterial attenuation values were measured. RESULTS: Image quality was rated to be the best for standard DSA. CO(2)-enhanced DSA was rated slightly superior to CO(2)-enhanced CT arteriography. No examination was considered to be nondiagnostic. The average multislice spiral CT (MSCT) scan duration was 7.9 sec +/- 0.6. The average amount of gas required for CO(2)-enhanced CT arteriography was 104 mL +/- 4, compared with 400 mL for CO(2)-enhanced DSA. Absolute attenuation values were significantly higher with CO(2)-enhanced CT arteriography (aorta, -928 HU +/- 39) than with standard CT angiography (490 HU +/- 40; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: CO(2)-enhanced CT arteriography is feasible. In a porcine model, this technique is capable of depicting the aortoperipheral vessels down to the lower limb. These results warrant further studies of the diagnostic value of CO(2)-enhanced MSCT arteriography for the detection of arterial pathologic processes.     

Work in progress. Intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography: evaluation in 150 patients

As part of an ongoing study comparing digital subtraction angiography (DSA) with conventional film-screen angiography, 150 patients were examined with arterial contrast material injections and digital filming techniques alone or combined with conventional angiography. Of 247 injections, the DSA study was good or excellent in 236, approaching the quality of conventional angiography for visualization of vessels greater than 1 mm in size. Advantages included improved vascular detail in selected areas such as the skull base, visualization of minimal contrast concentration in diseased vessels or postoperatively, and imaging of vessels distal to stenoses without the hazards of selective catheterization. DSA permitted rapid positioning under fluoroscopic control, instantaneous viewing of subtracted images, and reduced technologist time and film costs. Contrast material volume was reduced by 40 to 60%, allowing multiple studies in one sitting and study of patients with renal compromise.     

Indications for intravenous and intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in the diagnosis of cerebrovascular insufficiency. A new diagnostic concept including ultrasound

For screening of arteriosclerotic lesions of the carotid bifurcation duplex scanning (B-mode imaging plus doppler flow analysis) is the method of first choice, because it is really noninvasive and offers the same results as intravenous DSA (IV DSA). IV DSA should not be performed as a screening procedure unless ultrasound examinations are not available or are inadequate. Except for patients with isolated unilateral stenosis of the internal carotid artery near the bifurcation confirmed with both duplex scanning and IV DSA, arteriography is required for therapy planning. Aortic arch angiogram, selective extra- and intracranial carotid arteriography and--if necessary--vertebral and subclavian arteriography can be performed with intraarterial DSA (IA DSA). The application of DSA to catheter arteriography will help to reduce further the potential risk of adverse reactions related to high intravasal contrast doses specially in the cerebral circulation, but will not turn arteriography into a risk-free procedure. Postoperative examinations of the carotid bifurcation can be performed with ultrasound as well as with IV DSA. Extracranial bypasses are best demonstrated with IV DSA. Extraintracranial bypasses can be demonstrated only with IA DSA.     

MR angiography of the pedal arteries with gadobenate dimeglumine, a contrast agent with increased relaxivity, and comparison with selective intraarterial DSA

PURPOSE: To compare gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA)-enhanced MR angiography (i.e., contrast-enhanced MRA [CE-MRA]) of the pedal vasculature with selective digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 22 patients with PAOD were prospectively examined at 1.5T. For contrast enhancement, 0.1 mmol/kg body weight of Gd-BOPTA were applied. MRA consisted of dynamic imaging with acquisition of six consecutive data sets. Acquisition time for each data set was 24 seconds, voxel size was 1.0 x 1.0 x 1.3 mm(3). A total of 20 out of 22 patient underwent selective DSA, two patients fine-needle DSA. DSA and MRA were performed within seven days. Image analysis was independently done by two observers with assessment of overall image quality, motion artifacts, detection of patent vessel segments of the distal calf and pedal vessels, and the number of patent metatarsal arteries. After four weeks, a consensus reading of DSA images was done. A second consensus reading of CE-MRA was performed after a further six weeks. RESULTS: Consensus readings of MRA and DSA revealed higher image quality and fewer motion artifacts for MRA (P = 0.021 and P = 0.008, respectively, sign test); interobserver agreement was good (kappa = 0.78) for image quality, and moderate (kappa = 0.46) for motion artifacts. There were no differences between CE-MRA and DSA in detecting patent vessel segments with a high degree of agreement (kappa = 0.89), and interobserver agreement for MRA was substantial (kappa = 0.89). Significantly more vessels were assessed as partially occluded on DSA than on CE-MRA (P = 0.004). There was a good agreement between DSA and CE-MRA for assessment of relevant vessel stenosis (kappa = 0.61); interobserver agreement for MRA was good (kappa = 0.65). CE-MRA detected significantly more patent metatarsal arteries than did DSA (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Gd-BOPTA-enhanced MRA is comparable to DSA for assessment of the pedal vasculature, and is able to delineate significantly more patent vessels without segmental occlusions and more metatarsal arteries than selective DSA.     

Digital intraarterial subtraction technique of the extracerebral vascular system

We report the results from intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (IA DSA) of the extracerebral vessels with aortic arch injection of contrast medium via femoro-arterial puncture, instead of the more widely used intravenous digital subtraction angiography (IV DSA). Intraarterial DSA is performed using a lower contrast dose and rate, making this study less invasive and costly than the conventional arteriographic study of the aortic arch. Intraarterial DSA provides better resolution than IV DSA. The diagnostic accuracy is almost equivalent to conventional angiography and is largely superior to photographic subtraction angiography with intravenous injection of contrast media.     

The utility of digital subtraction arteriography in peripheral vascular disease

Digital subtraction angiography (DSA), whether used in conjunction with intravenous or intraarterial injection techniques, has an established role in evaluation of peripheral vascular disease. Use of DSA can reduce the time, cost, and patient discomfort of the standard arteriographic study. While it is limited by field size and patient cooperation in some instances, the utility of noninvasive imaging using intravenous DSA and the added anatomic detail of intraarterial DSA for roadmapping and delineation of small distal vessels provide the basis for future integration of standard arteriographic and DSA methods in assessment of peripheral vascular disease.