Powered Endoscopic Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy with Mucosal Flaps and Trimming of Anterior End of Middle Turbinate

Endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR), when compared to external techniques, has always had guarded acceptance primarily due to inconsistent success rates. The most common cause of surgical failure in endoscopic DCR is very high/very low mucosal incision, obstruction of neo-ostium by granulation tissue, infolding of flap or formation of synechiae between middle turbinate and the neo-ostium site post-operatively. Several techniques and modifications have been suggested by various authors over the years since the first introduction of endoscopic endonasal DCR. With the newer techniques and advancements, the success rates have become comparable or even higher than external DCR. The aim of our study was to determine the success of endoscopic endonasal DCR using the classical Wormald technique with a few modifications. A total of 37 cases of epiphora secondary to nasolacrimal duct obstruction were operated using endoscopic endonasal DCR technique. The surgical technique included classical Wormald principle of mucosal flap, removal of the overlying bone using Kerrisons punch & chisel-hammer followed by vertical incision on the sac. The medial wall of lacrimal sac was then trimmed using microdebrider, thus apposing it to the nasal mucosal flaps. The anterior end of middle turbinate was also trimmed prophylactically to prevent synechiae formation. The outcome and long term patency of the cases were evaluated. Of the 37 cases, 35 cases (94.6 %) had complete resolution of the epiphora at the end of 1 year follow up period. The two cases of failure were due to canaliculitis in one patient and extensive granulation around the neo-ostium in another. Thus the above method has very good success rate comparable to previous studies and very less chances of granulation tissue formation and blockage of neo-ostium by synechiae/flap infolding.     

Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy vs KTP 532 laser-assisted endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy

Objectives

Advances in endoscopy and lasers have improved surgical management of chronic nasolacrimal duct obstruction. This is a preliminary comparison between standard and laser assisted endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR).

Study Design

Combined retrospective and prospective study.

Setting

Tertiary referral hospital.

Patients and Methods

Thirty-eight cases of chronic nasolacrimal duct obstruction underwent endoscopic DCR (26 standard and 12, laser-assisted) and were assessed at 3 and at 6 months postoperatively by nasal endoscopy.

Results

Three months postoperatively (n=38), total relief of epiphora among the nonlaser group was 80.76 vs 75% in the laser group (P=0.982). At 6 months (n=19), the laser group had recorded 100% symptomatic relief compared to 85.71% in the nonlaser group (P=0.964). The laser group suffered fewer complications (33.33 vs 46.15% for nonlaser group).

Conclusion

Lasers show promise in long-term management of duct obstruction and are associated with fewer complications. A larger study is required before and generalization is made.     

Primary Endonasal DCR Without Stent: Our Experience and Case Series Analysis

Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy is widely accepted and effective treatment option for nasolacrimal duct obstruction. It can be done with or without the use of stents. This study was carried out to evaluate the results of endonasal DCR surgery and to access efficacy of this procedure without stenting. This is a prospective clinical study conducted in Departments of ENT and Ophthalmology, L.N. Medical College and J.K. Hospital, Bhopal from October 2008 to April 2012. A total of 90 patients with epiphora as evidenced by nasolacrimal duct blockage on syringing were included in the study. These patients underwent endoscopic DCR without stenting. The cases were followed up to 18 months postoperative. Surgical success was defined as anatomical patency and symptomatic relief at the end of the follow up period. Failure was defined as no symptomatic relief, and/or acute dacryocystitis, and/or non patent lacrimal drainage system. Surgical success was observed in 80 of 90 (88.89 %) patients. Incidence of complication was low as only 6 patients had minor complication of bleeding, synechie and granulation tissue formation. It was concluded that high success rates could be achieved in case of nasolacrimal duct obstruction by endoscopic DCR. Thus, we can minimize complications, discomfort, the cost of stenting and follow up visits after endonasal DCR surgery.     

Analysis of 104 Cases of Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy in a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Prospective Study

To evaluate the results of endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy performed in a tertiary care hospital. Prospective, nonrandomized, interventional clinical study. A prospective interventional study was performed on 104 patients presenting with epiphora between January 2006 and January 2010. All patients were operated by one surgeon. Out of 104 cases, 08 cases were of revision endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR). Bicanalicular silicon intubation was performed in all cases of revision endonasal DCR. Twelve patients had concomitant sinonasal disease for which septoplasty or FESS was done. The patency of nasolacrimal duct was assessed by doing syringing of lacrimal passage weekly for 1 month, monthly for 3 month, then at 6 month and 1 year. Out of 104 patients 10 patients lost follow up after surgery. Ninety four patients were followed for 1 year. On syringing, rhinostomy site was found patent in 80 patients (85.10 %), therefore they were fully satisfied. In 6 cases (6.38 %) minimal block was seen with clear fluid regurgitation, were to some extent symptomatically relieved and were found to be satisfied, whereas in 08 cases (8.51 %) syringing showed complete block. They required further management. Success rate of our study is comparable to other studies on endonasal DCR as well as external DCR, with advantages of less intra-operative bleeding, shorter operative time, better cosmesis, preservation of lacrimal pump mechanism. Other nasal pathology can be treated at the same time. Our results are clinically as well as statistically highly significant (P value < 0.0001).     

Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with conventional instruments: results and advantages over external dacryocystorhinostomy

Background

The aim of study is to evaluate the Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) with conventional instruments, its results and advantage over external dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR).

Methods

The study group comprised of 127 patients who underwent consecutive endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. The cases operated by one team were included in the study to make the uniform analysis and its result. There were 48 males and 79 female in this study and male female ratio was 1:1.6. The mean age of the patient was 37 years (range from 16 years to 58 years). There were wide variety of cases like epiphora, lacrimal sac abscess, lacrimal sac fistula, acute dacryocystitis and road vehicular accident. All the patients had undergone non-laser, non-powered conventional instruments surgery under local anesthesia. The lighted probe was not used in any case for sac identification. The free flow of saline through newly created stoma during sac syringing was considered as successful criteria. The stent was used in two cases of road vehicular accident and in remaining 125 cases no stent was used. There were 66 cases of epiphora, 30 cases of lacrimal sac abscess, 26 cases of acute dacryocystitis, 3 cases of lacrimal fistula and 2 case of road traffic accident with multiple fractures. The average follow up period was 17 months (maximum follow up 3 years and minimum 4 months.)

Results

The success rate was 96 %.

Conclusion

The endoscopic DCR with conventional instruments is safe with very high success rate without any complications. It can be done in acute cases and very much suited for lacrimal sac abscess and lacrimal sac fistula.     

Use of mitomycin C in endo-DCR

Objective: To evaluate the role of topical Mitomycin C in Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR), for the prevention of stomal stenosis.Patients: Thirty patients undergoing endoscopic DCR for chronic dacryocystitis were studied prospectively. The follow up period was 12 months.Technique: Patients were divided into two groups randomly. All of them underwent endoscopic DCR. One group was subjected to topical Mitomycin C application after surgery while the control group was not.Main outcome measures: Postoperative relief of epiphora and endoscopic documentation of the patency of the stoma were the main outcome measures.Results: 80% cases of the Mitomycin C group and 86.67% cases of the non Mitomycin C group had long-term successful results. This result is not statistically significant (p> 0.2).Conclusion: Intraoperative Mitomycin C application does not alter the long-term results in endoscopic DCR. A properly and adequately performed surgery is more vital for successful result.     

Endoscopic DCR: How To Improve The Results

Since Toti described the initial dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) operation in 1904 many technical modifications have evolved (Becker in Ophthalmic Surg 19:419–427, 1988). Overall, three groups of procedures are currently practised; external DCR, endoscopic DCR with contact laser, and surgical endoscopic DCR without laser (Woog et al. in Am J Ophthalmol 116:1–10, 1993; Jokinen and Karja in Arch Otolaryngol 100:41–44, 1974. Many factors influence the outcome of these different approaches. The purpose of this study was to improve the long term surgical outcome in endonasal DCR. A retrospective analysis of more than 1,500 patients, who underwent primary endoscopic DCR, was done and specific small modifications were identified and applied in the next 108 cases showing an improvement in the results.     

Canine fossa approaches in endoscopic sinus surgery - our experience

Objective

To define the role of canine fossa approach when standard endoscopic endonasal sinus surgery technique fails.

Study design

Retrospective review of all endoscopic sinus surgeries performed from 1992 to 2007.

Result

Out of 1612 endoscopic sinus surgeries for various indications, CFA was used in 80 patients (4.96%) and among this 15 had bilateral procedure.The various diseases which required CFA were allergic fungal sinusitis (AFS), Fungal ball, Chronic invasive aspergillosis,antro choanal polyp, inflammatory polyp, Mucocoele and Maxillary cyst,inverted papilloma and Juvenile Nasopharyngeal Angiofibroma (JNA). Eight patients had minor complications (cheek swelling-6, facial pain-2 ) which resolved in 5 days.

Conclusion

Canine fossa approach offers an ancillary approach to failed standard endoscopic endonasal technique thereby avoiding other more invasive procedures.     

Endoscopic endonasal medial maxillectomy: case series

Introduction

A medial maxillectomy (MM) consists of a complete resection of the medial wall of the maxillary sinus. Traditionally the surgery is performed via an open approach. With more familiarity and expertise in endoscopic sinus surgery the endonasal approach is feasible.

Objective

To expose the surgical technique and report the results of endonasal endoscopic MM in a series of 6 consecutive patients.

Materials and methods

Between August 2006 and October 2009, 6 patients were operated with this procedure. All were men. The mean age was 62-year-old (range: 43–83). In 5 cases, the surgery was performed for inverted papillomas confined to the maxillary sinus. In one case it was a primary surgery whereas it was a revision surgery for the others. The sixth patient was operated for a solitary extramedullary plasmocytoma inserted on the intersinonasal wall persistent after an external radiation therapy.

Results

All the patients are free of disease at the time of writing with a mean follow-up of 18,2 months (range: 9–38). This has been confirmed by a nasal endoscopy and CT scans. There were no major per or postoperative complications. Patients suffered from crusting for at least 6 months postoperatively necessitating daily nasal douches. One patient is still complaining of intermittent epiphora when he is exposed to wind.

Conclusion

Endoscopic MM can be successfully performed for the resection of expanding processes involving the maxillary sinus and/or the intersinonasal wall. Compared to open approaches, it seems to be as effective with less postoperative morbidity. An important technical point is to do the anterior osteotomy in front of the nasolacrimal duct in order to expose the prelacrimal recess that is typically an area for possible recurrence. Exact determination of the tumor attachment during the surgery is another key point for success.     

Double Posterior Based Flap Technique in Primary Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy With and Without Using Powered Instrument

To demonstrate the surgical technique and outcomes of double posterior based flap technique in primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) with and without use of powered instrument. 28 patients of nasolacrimal duct obstruction were included in the study from September 2012 to February 2015. All underwent endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with double posterior based nasal and lacrimal flap technique. In patients of group A (14 patients), bone removal was done with the help of Smith–Kerrison punch forceps and in patients of group B (14 patients), powered drill has been used for the same. Patients were visited the endoscopic clinic at 1, 3, 6 months and 1 year after the surgery for post operative evaluation. Of 28 patients, 26(92.85%) were found free of symptoms at the end of 1, 3 and at 6 months. One from each group had recurrence of symptoms. At the end of 12 months of 25 patients, 3(12%) patients were found to have recurrence of symptoms of which 1(8.33%) patients was from group A and 2(15.38%) were from group B and failures were because of granulation tissue and stomal stenosis. Patients assisted with powered drill had more postoperative complications compared to cold instrument. Double posterior based flap technique in primary endoscopic DCR without the assistance of powered drill could be an effective surgical option for the patients of chronic nasolacrimal duct obstruction enabling early epithelisation by preventing peristomal granulation tissue resulting in encouraging surgical outcome with least postoperative complication.     

Improving the Results of Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy with Mitomycin C Application: A Prospective Case–Control Study

Many surgical advancement paved to surgical success in endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Mitomycin C is a systemic chemotherapeutic agent derived from Streptomyces caespitosus that inhibits the synthesis of DNA, cellular RNA, and protein by inhibiting the synthesis of collagen by fibroblasts. The objective of the study was to evaluate the advantage of mitomycin C in primary endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy without stenting. Randomised case control design. Tertiary academic centre in central India. 112 patients who presented with epiphora and diagnosed as chronic dacryocystitis after syringing by ophthalmologist, were selected and randomised into two groups with or without mitomycin C intraoperative application. 112 eyes underwent endoscopic-dacryocystorhinostomy. Additional surgeries were done according to necessity. Mitomycin C was applied in concentration of 0.4 mg/dl for 5 min. Patients were followed up on OPD-basis at the end of 1st week, 1st month, 3rd month and over phone call at end of 1 year. Symptomatic improvement assessed by verbal enquiry and clinically by syringing by ophthalmologist. 8 patients underwent septal surgery in case group and 4 in control group along with 1 concha bullosa correction in the case group (p?<?0.05). Nil intraoperative complications (p?<?0.05) and nil postoperative complication noted (p?<?0.05). Functional and anatomical patency found to be 100% at the end of 1st week in both groups, 96.5% at 3rd month in case group and 96.4% and 92.9% at 1 month and 3 month respectively in control group. Nasal endoscopy of all surgical failures showed restenosis in both case group and control group except 1 patient with granulation in control group. Eventhough intraoperative mitomycin C application is effective in increasing the success rate of endonasal DCR surgery in standard nasolacrimal duct obstruction, and with no significant complications from its use, the study did not show added benefit in the primary endoscopic endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy without stenting.     

鼻内镜下手术治疗侵及眼眶的鼻腔鼻窦肿瘤

目的： 探讨鼻内镜下手术治疗侵及眼眶的鼻腔鼻窦肿瘤的安全性、临床效果和术式的选择。方法:回顾性分析15例在鼻内镜下行切除手术治疗的侵及眼眶的良性和早期恶性鼻腔鼻窦肿瘤患者的临床资料、手术方法、并发症及治疗预后。结果:全部病例中,11例单纯经鼻内镜下切除肿瘤,4例经鼻腔和鼻外切口双径路手术治疗,其中 1例侵袭性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者术后出现下睑外翻,经治疗后好转;1例鼻腔鼻窦骨瘤患者于鼻内镜下全切骨瘤,术后出现患侧内眦外移;4例良性骨源性病变患者行鼻内镜下病变部分切除术,其余病例均彻底切除肿瘤而无明显并发症,随访6~36月未见复发。结论:鼻内镜下手术治疗侵及眼眶的鼻腔鼻窦肿瘤有其独特的优势,在鼻内镜下单纯经鼻腔或内镜辅助经鼻腔和鼻外切口双径路手术治疗可以取得比较好的临床预后。     

Endonasal Microdebrider Assisted Excision of Congenital Intranasal Nasolacrimal Duct Cyst or Inferior Mucocoele

Objective

Congenital intranasal nasolacrimal duct (NLD) cyst is a rare clinical entity in the newborn whilst inferior mucocoeles are more common. We reviewed our case series of the management of patients presenting with congenital intranasal NLD cysts and inferior mucocoeles treated using powered instrumentation under endoscopic guidance.

Methods

A retrospective review identified three patients, between 2010 and 2013, who have had microdebrider assisted endoscopic marsupialisation of congenital intranasal NLD cysts under joint ENT and Ophthalmology care.

Results

Diagnosis was made based on intraoperative endoscopic nasal examination carried out during treatment of patients with epiphora. All patients were 2 years old or younger presented with persistent epiphora since birth with sticky eyes. All had normal development with no other past medical history of note. Two patients had unilateral and one patient had bilateral congenital intranasal NLD cysts/inferior mucocoels identified. These were treated by endoscopic incision of the cyst with drainage of pus and excision of excess mucosal tissue using a powered microdebrider to effect marsupialisation and prevent re healing of the floppy redundant flaps of the incised cyst. No silastic tubes were placed. All patients were discharged from clinic 3 months post surgery with complete resolution of symptoms and no complications.

Conclusions

Microdebrider assisted endoscopic marsupialisation is a safe and effective treatment for removal of excess tissue in the treatment for congenital intranasal NLD cyst/inferior mucocoele whilst also obviating the need for silastic intubation and a further general anaesthetic for stent removal.     

Blockage of the lacrimal drainage apparatus as a side effect of docetaxel therapy

BACKGROUND: The current study was conducted to report the severity and management of canalicular and nasolacrimal duct stenosis as a side effect of docetaxel therapy and to report the outcomes of surgical intervention for this condition. METHODS: The records of 148 patients with epiphora associated with docetaxel therapy who were evaluated at the Ophthalmology Service at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center were reviewed. The frequency of docetaxel administration, the dose intensity, the cumulative dose of docetaxel, and any concomitant chemotherapeutic agents were recorded. Each patient underwent an ophthalmologic examination and in-office probing and irrigation. The patients either were treated with topical steroids or offered a surgical procedure for canalicular stenosis- (silicone intubation, dacryocystorhinostomy [DCR] with the placement of silicone tubes, or DCR with the placement of Pyrex glass tubes), depending on the severity of the canalicular stenosis. RESULTS: Docetaxel was given weekly in 71 patients, every 2 weeks in 5 patients, and every 3 weeks in 72 patients. Thirty patients (59 eyes) who received weekly docetaxel underwent surgery to correct epiphora. Twenty-three patients (39 eyes) were treated with temporary silicone tube placement, 9 patients (13 eyes) were treated with DCR with temporary silicone tube placement, and 4 patients (7 eyes) were treated with DCR with permanent Pyrex glass tube placement. Twenty-nine of the 30 patients who underwent surgery reported improvement or total resolution of epiphora after the procedure. Ten additional patients (20 eyes) who received weekly docetaxel had complete closure of their canaliculi but elected not to undergo surgery. Of special note were two patients who received weekly docetaxel in the neoadjuvant setting and developed complete closure of the canaliculi. Of the patients who received docetaxel every 2 or 3 weeks, only 3 required a surgical intervention to correct epiphora; none required Pyrex glass tube placement. CONCLUSIONS: Canalicular and nasolacrimal duct obstruction is a common side effect of weekly docetaxel therapy and can occur even when this drug is used in the neoadjuvant setting. The results of the current study indicate that early temporary silicone intubation in symptomatic patients receiving weekly docetaxel can prevent further closure of the lacrimal drainage apparatus and obviate more involved surgical interventions and permanent Pyrex glass tube placement. Cancer 2003;98:504-7.     

Concept of foreign body-its past and present

Endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy [EDCR] is considered to be a superior alternative technique to the conventional external dacryocystorhinostomy [DCR], both in primary and secondary cases. It is of particular value in children and young adults as it avoids an external scar. Sixteen cases of chronic dacryo-cystitis were treated by the endoscopic technique, including 8 revision cases of failed external approach. In all cases except one, a patent nasolacrimal fistula was noted, with a success rate of 93.7%. The authors share their experience in EDCR and review the relevant literature.     

Endoscopic Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy: Best Surgical Management for DCR

EEDCR is a highly rewarding Endoscopic procedure for management of dacryocystitis when epiphora does not respond to medications or repeated syringing of nasolacrimal duct. It is a simple, less time consuming, safe but skilful, highly satisfying surgery both for the patients as well as the surgeons. There is very big advantage of EEDCR, it is close 100% successful procedure, even if there is recurrence of epiphora it is again correctable fully with no residual affects. EEDCR is far more superior to External DCR/Laser DCR and there are definite reasons for it. A total number of 578 cases have been operated by me from April 1, 2005 to March 31, 2011, only very few reoccurrences were there and they were corrected easily so much so that it can be said that it is a close 100% successful procedure and best surgical management of DACRYOCYSTITIS up to date. The successful outcome was defined as symptomatic relief from epiphora and dacryocystitis and a patent nasolacrimal duct upon syringing at the end of procedure and on follow up of patient.     

Canalicular stenosis secondary to weekly docetaxel: a potentially preventable side effect.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to describe canalicular stenosis as a mechanism for epiphora (excessive tearing) secondary to weekly docetaxel. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients with metastatic breast cancer who developed epiphora during weekly docetaxel therapy underwent an ophthalmologic examination, and probing and irrigation of the nasolacrimal ducts. The total duration of docetaxel therapy, the duration of treatment at the time of onset of epiphora, the number of infusions, the cumulative dose of docetaxel and the severity of canalicular stenosis were recorded. RESULTS: All 14 patients had anatomic narrowing of the canaliculi as the underlying mechanism for epiphora. Bicanalicular silicone intubation or dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) was recommended for all 14 patients. Eleven patients underwent surgery and experienced resolution of their symptoms. The three patients who declined surgery continue to have epiphora at the time of this report. CONCLUSIONS: Canalicular stenosis is an underlying mechanism for epiphora in patients receiving weekly docetaxel. Bicanalicular silicone intubation should be considered early in the course of weekly docetaxel therapy to prevent complete closure of the canaliculi. Once complete or near complete stenosis of the canaliculi occurs, DCR with a permanent pyrex glass tube placement may become necessary to overcome the blockage of tear outflow.     

Clinical Outcomes of Using a Conservative Approach of Late Esophageal Stent Placement in Palliation of Malignant Dysphagia

Background

Esophageal stents have been used as first-line treatment for palliation of malignant dysphagia, but this is associated with significant complications. The present study evaluated clinical outcomes and survival in patients with malignant dysphagia with esophageal stent placement who did not respond to prior chemoradiation or endoscopic modalities.

Patients and Methods

Patients with esophageal cancer, who had esophageal stents, were retrospectively reviewed from the electronic medical records. The patient demographics, type of stent placed, dysphagia scores, stent-related complications, and survival were recorded.

Results

Thirty-five patients with esophageal cancer received a total of 41 stents. There were 25 males and 10 females with mean age of 69.8 years. Twenty-two patients had esophageal adenocarcinoma, ten patients had squamous cell carcinoma, and three had poorly differentiated tumor. Esophageal malignancy was early stage (I, II) in 10 patients and advanced (III, IV) in 24 patients. Three patients had upper esophageal involvement, eight patients had mid-esophageal involvement; distal esophageal malignancy was present in 24 patients with 10 patients having gastroesophageal junction involvement. Six patients presented with tracheoesophageal fistula. Nine patients had prior esophagectomy. Thirty-three patients had chemoradiation, and 32 patients had other endoscopic therapies previously. Twelve of the 35 (33%) patients developed stent-related complications; nine patients had dysphagia due to various causes; one patient each developed aspiration, intractable hiccups, and intractable vomiting after stent placement, respectively. Nine patients underwent a repeat esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Development of stent-related complications was not significantly associated with poor survival.

Conclusions

The clinical outcomes for patients with esophageal stent placement for malignant dysphagia after chemoradiation and other endoscopic treatments is not worse than that reported in patients where esophageal stent placement was used as first-line treatment.     

Pediatric Endoscopic DCR: The Outcome in 50 Patients

Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction is a very common condition affecting 20 % of infants. Pediatric DCR is indicated when there is no response to previous therapy like probing, or is associated with recurrent dacryocystitis. This is a retrospective case series study of 50 pediatric patients who underwent endoscopic DCR in two centers, Jordan University Hospital/Jordan, and Mosul teaching and private hospitals/Iraq. The age ranged from 3 to 12 years with a mean of 6.2 years. The overall success rate of endoscopic DCR was 90 %, and failed cases were mainly due to presaccal obstruction. No major complications were reported, but minor complications occurred in about 60 % of cases. As a conclusion, endoscopic DCR is a safe and effective procedure in pediatric age group.     

CT scan evaluation of the anatomical variations of the ostiomeatal complex

Introduction

Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) has revolutionized the approach and treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis. Certain anatomical variations are thought to be predisposing factors for the development of sinus disease and it is necessary, for the surgeon to be aware of these variations, especially if the patient is a candidate for FESS.

Objective

The aim of the present study was to identify the various anatomical variations of the ostiomeatal complex in patients of chronic rhinosinusitis who underwent FESS.

Materials and methods

A total of 150 patients of chronic rhinosinusitis (medical treatment failures) who were subjected to FESS were CT scanned preoperatively to find any bony anatomic variation and the extent of mucosal disease.

Results

Concha bullosa was the commonest anatomic variation and was seen in 45 (30%) patients. The other anatomic variations noted included: paradoxical middle turbinate in 9.33% patients, uncinate process variations in 25% patients, agger nasi cells in 9.33%, Haller cells in 8.66% and posterior septal deviations in 25.33% patients. The mucosal disease was most commonly seen in anterior ethmoids (87.33% ), followed by maxillary sinus ostial area (70%), maxillary sinus disease (65.33%), posterior ethmoidal disease (38%), frontal sinus disease (15%) and sphenoid sinus mucosal disease (8.66%) patients.

Conclusion

A thorough preoperative CT evaluation of the patients undergoing FESS is necessary to detect various anatomical variations in the ostiomeatal complex.