Evaluation of a recruitment maneuver with positive inspiratory pressure and high PEEP in patients with severe ARDS

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effect of a recruitment maneuver (RM) with constant positive inspiratory pressure and high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on oxygenation and static compliance (Cs) in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS: Eight patients with ARDS ventilated with lung-protective strategy and an arterial partial pressure of oxygen to inspired oxygen fraction ratio (PaO2/FIO2) < or =100 mmHg regardless of PEEP were prospectively studied. The RM was performed in pressure-controlled ventilation at FIO2 of 1.0 until PaO2 reached 250 mmHg or a maximal plateau pressure/PEEP of 60/45 cmH2O was achieved. The RM was performed with stepwise increases of 5 cmH2O of PEEP every 2 min and thereafter with stepwise decreases of 2 cmH2O of PEEP every 2 min until a drop in PaO2 >10% below the recruitment PEEP level. Data was collected before (preRM), during and after 30 min (posRM). RESULTS: The PaO2/FIO2 increased from 83 +/- 22 mmHg preRM to 118 +/- 32 mmHg posRM (P = 0.001). The Cs increased from 28 +/- 10 ml cmH2O(-1) preRM to 35 +/- 12 ml cmH2O(-1) posRM (P = 0.025). The PEEP was 12 +/- 3 cmH2O preRM and was set at 15 +/- 4 cmH2O posRM (P = 0.025). The PEEP of recruitment was 36 +/- 9 cmH2O and the collapsing PEEP was 13 +/- 4 cmH2O. The PaO2 of recruitment was 225 +/- 105 mmHg, with five patients reaching a PaO2 > or = 250 mmHg. The FIO2 decreased from 0.76 +/- 0.16 preRM to 0.63 +/- 0.15 posRM (P = 0.001). No major complications were detected. CONCLUSION: Recruitment maneuver was safe and useful to improve oxygenation and Cs in patients with severe ARDS ventilated with lung-protective strategy.     

胸科手术中单肺通气期间不同通气方式的比较

目的 观察胸科手术病人麻醉中单肺通气（ＯＬＶ）期间不同通气方式的效果。方法 １０例择期胸科手术成年病人,ＡＳＡⅠ～Ⅱ级,在ＯＬＶ期间首先采用全潮气量（１０ｍｌ／ｋｇ）不加ＰＥＥＰ,随后采用半潮气量（５ｍｌ／ｋｇ）同时施加７ｃｍＨ２Ｏ ＰＥＥＰ两种通气方式,保持每分通气量不变。在开胸后ＯＬＶ前,ＯＬＶ时采用敏种通气方式后３０ｍｉｎ,以及恢复双肺通气（ＴＬＶ）后３０ｍｉｎ分别进行血气分析,同时监测气道     

The effect of positive end expiratory pressure on the respiratory profile during one-lung ventilation for thoracotomy

Summary In this randomised controlled trial we examined the effects of four different levels of positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP at 0, 5, 8 or 10 cmH(2)O), added to the dependent lung, on respiratory profile and oxygenation during one lung ventilation. Forty-six patients were recruited to receive one of the randomised PEEP levels during one lung ventilation. We did not find significant differences in lung compliance, intra-operative or postoperative oxygenation amongst the four different groups. However, the physiological deadspace to tidal volume ventilation ratio was significantly lower in the 8 cmH(2)O PEEP group compared with the other levels of PEEP (p < 0.0001). We concluded that the use of PEEP (< or =10 cmH(2)O) during one lung ventilation does not clinically improve lung compliance, intra-operative or postoperative oxygenation despite a statistically significant reduction in the physiological deadspace to tidal volume ratio.     

Effect of PEEP and inhaled nitric oxide on pulmonary gas exchange during gaseous and partial liquid ventilation with small volumes of perfluorocarbon

BACKGROUND: Partial liquid ventilation, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and inhaled nitric oxide (NO) can improve ventilation/perfusion mismatch in acute lung injury (ALI). The aim of the present study was to compare gas exchange and hemodynamics in experimental ALI during gaseous and partial liquid ventilation at two different levels of PEEP, with and without the inhalation of nitric oxide. METHODS: Seven pigs (24+/-2 kg BW) were surfactant-depleted by repeated lung lavage with saline. Gas exchange and hemodynamic parameters were assessed in all animals during gaseous and subsequent partial liquid ventilation at two levels of PEEP (5 and 15 cmH2O) and intermittent inhalation of 10 ppm NO. RESULTS: Arterial oxygenation increased significantly with a simultaneous decrease in cardiac output when PEEP 15 cmH2O was applied during gaseous and partial liquid ventilation. All other hemodynamic parameters revealed no relevant changes. Inhalation of NO and instillation of perfluorocarbon had no additive effects on pulmonary gas exchange when compared to PEEP 15 cmH2O alone. CONCLUSION: In experimental lung injury, improvements in gas exchange are most distinct during mechanical ventilation with PEEP 15 cmH2O without significantly impairing hemodynamics. Partial liquid ventilation and inhaled NO did not cause an additive increase of PaO2.     

Effect of respiratory care on pulmonary function in patients after cardiopulmonary bypass

BACKGROUND: Respiratory failure after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) remains one of the major complications after cardiac surgery. This study was designed to evaluate effects of respiratory care after CPB on pulmonary function. METHODS: Eighteen patients scheduled for cardiac surgery were investigated. Preoperative respiratory functions (%VC, FEV1.0%, V25/Ht, FRC-CC, deltaN2) were measured in all the patients. Both induction and maintenance of anesthesia were performed using propofol, midazolam, fentanyl, and vecuronium bromide. All the patients were ventilated using volume controlled ventilation by setting FIO2 at 0.5, the respiratory frequency at 15 x min(-1), the tidal volume at 6-10 ml x kg(-1) adjusted to maintain PaCO2 between 30 to 40 mmHg, and the peak airway pressures below 40 cmH2O, PEEP of 0 cmH2O. From 1 hour after the operation, the patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: group A, ventilated artificially with PEEP of 5 cmH2O and group B, ventilated with PEEP adjusted to the patient's lower inflection point (LIP) obtained by the pressure-volume curve. PaO2, Qs/Qt and FRC were measured after induction of anesthesia, just after surgery, 1 hour after surgery and 1 hour after artificial ventilation with PEEP. The values of the LIP were obtained from the P-V curves with the constant-flow methods before and after surgery. RESULTS: PaO2 and FRC decreased and Qs/Qt increased significantly after the surgery in all the patients. One hour after artificial ventilation with PEEP, PaO2 increased and Qs/Qt decreased significantly compared with the values after operation. However, there was no significant difference in the magnitude of these changes among the different groups. The changes in PaO2 and Qs/Qt were not correlated with the changes in FRC and preoperative respiratory functions. The LIP tended to increase after surgery in 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although pulmonary function deteriorated after CPB. PEEP could improve oxygenation in all the patients. There were no significant differences in the degree of these improvements between patients receiving PEEP of 5 cmH2O and patients with PEEP adjusted to their LIP. There was no significant relationship between preoperative pulmonary function and changes in oxygenation after CPB.     

Partial liquid ventilation in acute salt water-induced lung injury

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Salt-water aspiration results in pulmonary oedema and hypoxia. We tested the hypothesis that partial liquid ventilation has beneficial effects on gas exchange and rate of survival in acute and extended salt water-induced lung injury. METHODS: Anaesthetized, ventilated rats (tidal volume 6 mL kg(-1), PEEP 5 cmH2O) received a tracheal salt-water instillation (3%, 8 mL kg(-1) body weight) and were randomly assigned to three groups (n = 10 per group). While lungs of Group 1 were gas-ventilated, lungs of Group 2 received a single perfluorocarbon instillation (30 min after the injury, 5 mL kg(-1) perfluorocarbon) and lungs of Group 3 received an additional continuous perfluorocarbon application into the treachea (5 mL kg(-1) h(-1)) Arterial blood gases were measured with an intravascular blood gas sensor. RESULTS: Salt-water instillation resulted in a marked decrease in PaO2 values within 30 min (from 432 +/- 65 to 83 +/- 40 mmHg, FiO2 = 1.0, P < 0.01). Arterial oxygenation improved in all three groups irrespective of treatment. We observed no significant differences between groups in peak PaO2 and PaCO2 values. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that partial liquid ventilation has no additional beneficial effects on gas exchange after life-threatening salt water-induced lung injury when compared to conventional gas ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure.     

Effects of lung recruitment maneuver and positive end-expiratory pressure on lung volume,respiratory mechanics and alveolar gas mixing in patients ventilated after cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is needed to maintain the improved oxygenation and lung volume achieved after a lung recruitment maneuver in patients ventilated after cardiac surgery performed in the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). METHODS: A prospective, randomized, controlled study in a university hospital intensive care unit. Sixteen patients who had undergone cardiac surgery in CPB were studied during the recovery phase while still being mechanically ventilated with an inspired fraction of oxygen (FiO2) 1.0. Eight patients were randomized to lung recruitment (two 20-s inflations to 45 cmH2O), after which PEEP was set and kept for 2.5 h at 1 cmH2O above the pressure at the lower inflexion point (14+/-3 cmH2O, mean +/-SD) obtained from a static pressure-volume (PV) curve (PEEP group). The remaining eight patients were randomized to a recruitment maneuver only (ZEEP group). End-expiratory lung volume (EELV), series dead space, ventilation homogeneity, hemodynamics and PaO2 (oxygenation) were measured every 30 min during a 3-h period. PV curves were obtained at baseline, after 2.5 h, and in the PEEP group at 3 h. RESULTS: In the ZEEP group all measures were unchanged. In the PEEP group the EELV increased with 1220+/-254 ml (P<0.001) and PaO2 with 16+/-16 kPa (P<0.05) after lung recruitment. When PEEP was discontinued EELV decreased but PaO2 was maintained. The PV curve at 2.5 h coincided with the curve obtained at 3 h, and both curves were both steeper than and located above the baseline curve. CONCLUSIONS: Positive end-expiratory pressure is required after a lung recruitment maneuver in patients ventilated with high FiO2 after cardiac surgery to maintain lung volumes and the improved oxygenation.     

The effect of timing of application of positive end-expiratory pressure on oxygenation during one-lung ventilation

Many studies have confirmed that applying positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to the dependent lung during one-lung ventilation (OLV) improves oxygenation. Our purpose was to investigate the best time and level of PEEP application. Thirty patients undergoing thoracic surgery were randomised into three groups. After 20 minutes of two-lung ventilation (TLV) in the lateral position, all patients received OLV for one hour During OLV, 0, 5, 10 cmH2O PEEP were applied in order in group A, with each level sustained for 20 minutes. Group B had 5 cmH2O PEEP applied and maintained for one hour Patients in group C received PEEP with levels set in the opposite order to that of group A. The ventilation model was then converted to TLV. PaO2, PaCO2 and respiratory mechanical variables were compared at five different time points among groups, 20 minutes after TLV (T1), 20 (T2), 40 (T3) and 60 minutes (T4) after OLV and 20 minutes after conversion to TLV (T5). We found that PaO2 was lower in group A than the other two groups at T2 (P <0.05). PaO2 decreased significantly at T5 compared with T1 (P <0.05) in group A only. When PEEP was set to 10 cmH2O, the airway pressure increased significantly (P <0.05). These findings indicate that PEEP applied at the initial time of OLV improves oxygenation most beneficially. Five cmH2O PEEP may produce this beneficial effect without the increase in airway pressure associated with 10 cmH2O PEEP.     

Relation of the static compliance curve and positive end-expiratory pressure to oxygenation during one-lung ventilation.

BACKGROUND: Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is commonly applied to the ventilated lung to try to improve oxygenation during one-lung ventilation but is an unreliable therapy and occasionally causes arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO(2)) to decrease further. The current study examined whether the effects of PEEP on oxygenation depend on the static compliance curve of the lung to which it is applied. METHODS: Forty-two adults undergoing thoracic surgery were studied during stable, open-chest, one-lung ventilation. Arterial blood gases were measured during two-lung ventilation and one-lung ventilation before, during, and after the application of 5 cm H(2)O PEEP to the ventilated lung. The plateau end-expiratory pressure and static compliance curve of the ventilated lung were measured with and without applied PEEP, and the lower inflection point was determined from the compliance curve. RESULTS: Mean (+/- SD) PaO(2) values, with a fraction of inspired oxygen of 1.0, were not different during one-lung ventilation before (192 +/- 91 mmHg), during (190 +/- 90), or after ( 205 +/- 79) the addition of 5 cm H(2)O PEEP. The mean plateau end-expiratory pressure increased from 4.2 to 6.8 cm H(2)O with the application of 5 cm H(2)O PEEP and decreased to 4.5 cm H(2)O when 5 cm H(2)O PEEP was removed. Six patients showed a clinically useful (> 20%) increase in PaO(2) with 5 cm H(2)O PEEP, and nine patients had a greater than 20% decrease in PaO(2). The change in PaO(2) with the application of 5 cm H(2)O PEEP correlated in an inverse fashion with the change in the gradient between the end-expiratory pressure and the pressure at the lower inflection point (r = 0.76). The subgroup of patients with a PaO(2) during two-lung ventilation that was less than the mean (365 mmHg) and an end-expiratory pressure during one-lung ventilation without applied PEEP less than the mean were more likely to have an increase in PaO(2) when 5 cm H(2)O PEEP was applied. CONCLUSIONS: The effects of the application of external 5 cm H(2)O PEEP on oxygenation during one-lung ventilation correspond to individual changes in the relation between the plateau end-expiratory pressure and the inflection point of the static compliance curve. When the application of PEEP causes the end-expiratory pressure to increase from a low level toward the inflection point, oxygenation is likely to improve. Conversely, if the addition of PEEP causes an increased inflation of the ventilated lung that raises the equilibrium end-expiratory pressure beyond the inflection point, oxygenation is likely to deteriorate.     

利用动态肺顺应性设定呼气末正压在胸腔镜肺叶切除术中的运用

目的 探讨单肺通气利用动态肺顺应性设定呼气末正压通气(positive end-expiratory pressure,PEEP)的优势及可行性. 方法 选择预行右侧肺叶切除患者80例,完全随机分为A组和B组,每组40例:A组,单肺通气实施肺膨胀(sustained inflation,SI)复张后加用20 cmH2O(1 cmH2O=0.098 kPa)的PEEP并递减滴定,随后以得到最大肺顺应性的PEEP值通气,直到恢复双肺通气;B组,通气PEEP值固定为5 cmH2O,其他通气方法同A组.记录患者血气、呼吸等参数. 结果 两组设定的PEEP值[A组(9.2±1.2) cmH2O,B组5 cmH2O]差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);在单肺通气1 h(T3)、手术结束(T4)时,两组动脉血氧分压(partial pressure of oxygen,PaO2)比较,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);B组的PaO2在T3～T4逐步降低,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05),而A组则维持较好(P＞0.05);T3、T4时刻A组的动态肺顺应性[(30.8±5.9)、(30.7±6.4) ml/cmH2O]与B组[(26.6±5.5)、(26.4±5.2) ml/cmH2O]比较,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05). 结论 胸腔镜肺叶切除术中的单肺通气,利用动态肺顺应性设定的PEEP值通气能够得到更好的氧合及呼吸参数,并且维持较好.     

Ibuprofen prevents deterioration in static transpulmonary compliance and transalveolar protein flux in septic porcine acute lung injury

The effects of intravenous ibuprofen on measurements of pulmonary function and alveolar capillary membrane permeability to protein in sepsis-induced porcine acute lung injury (ALI) were studied. Young swine (15-25 kg) were anesthetized, cannulated, and ventilated (5 cm H2O PEEP, 0.5 FIO2, and 15 cc/kg tidal volume). Three groups were studied: septic animals (Ps, n = 10) received Pseudomonas aeruginosa for 1 hr IV, controls (C, n = 9) received 0.9% NaCl, and ibuprofen-treated septic animals (Ps + Ibu, n = 7) received ibuprofen 12.5 mg/kg at 0 and 120 min post Ps. Systemic (SAP) and pulmonary (PAP) arterial pressures, PaO2, cardiac index (CI), static lung compliance (CL), EVLW (thermal cardiogreen), and peripheral white blood cell counts (WBC) were measured. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed for protein and % neutrophil (%PMN) content. Results: Ps produced significant (p less than 0.05) decreases in CL, PaO2, SAP, CI, and peripheral WBC and increases in PAP, EVLW, BAL protein, and %PMN's vs. controls. Ibu prevented the early increase in PAP and attenuated the late increase in PAP and EVLW. Ibu also maintained PaO2, CL, BAL protein, and %PMN's in BAL at control levels, but exhibited no significant effect on peripheral leukopenia. These data strongly suggest that ibuprofen administered before and at 120 min after onset of Pseudomonas infusion improves lung compliance and affects neutrophil function sufficiently to significantly ameliorate many of the physiologic derangements in acute sepsis.     

Protective ventilation attenuates postoperative pulmonary dysfunction in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain if protective ventilation can attenuate the damaging postoperative pulmonary effects of cardiopulmonary bypass (increases in airway pressure, decreases in lung compliance, and increases in shunt). DESIGN: Prospective, randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Single university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-five patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft procedure and early extubation. INTERVENTIONS: Thirteen patients received conventional mechanical ventilation (CV; respiratory rate, 8 breaths/min; tidal volume, 12 mL/kg; fraction of inspired oxygen [FIO2], 1.0; positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP], +5), and 12 patients received protective mechanical ventilation (PV; respiratory rate, 16 breaths/min; tidal volume, 6 mL/kg; FIO2, 1.0; PEEP, +5). Perioperative anesthetic and surgical management were standardized. Various pulmonary parameters were determined twice perioperatively: 10 minutes after intubation and 60 minutes after arrival in the intensive care unit. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The mean postoperative increase in peak airway pressure in group CV was significantly larger than the mean postoperative increase in peak airway pressure in group PV (7.1 v 2.4 cm H2O; p < 0.001). Group CV experienced significant postoperative increases in plateau airway pressure (p = 0.007), but group PV did not (p = 0.644). The mean postoperative decrease in dynamic lung compliance in group CV was significantly larger than the mean postoperative decrease in dynamic lung compliance in group PV (14.9 v 5.5 mL/cm H2O; p = 0.002). Group CV experienced significant postoperative decreases in static lung compliance (p = 0.014), but group PV did not (p = 0.645). Group CV experienced significant postoperative increases in shunt (15.5% to 21.4%; p = 0.021), but group PV did not (18.4% to 21.2%; p = 0.265). CONCLUSIONS: Data indicate that protective ventilation decreases pulmonary damage caused by mechanical ventilation in normal and abnormal lungs. The results of this investigation indicate that protective ventilation may also help attenuate the postoperative pulmonary dysfunction (increases in airway pressure, decreases in lung compliance, and increases in shunt) commonly seen in patients after exposure to cardiopulmonary bypass.     

Positive pressure versus pressure support ventilation at different levels of PEEP using the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway

We compared positive pressure ventilation with pressure support ventilation at different levels of positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) using the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA). Forty-two anaesthetized adults (ASA 1-2, aged 19 to 63 years) underwent positive pressure ventilation and then pressure support ventilation each with PEEP set at 0, 5 and 10 cmH2O in random order. Pressure support ventilation was with the inspired tidal volume (VTInsp) set at 7 ml/kg and the respiratory rate adjusted to maintain the end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2) at 40 mmHg. Pressure support ventilation was with pressure support set at 5 cmH2O above PEEP and initiated when inspiration produced a 2 cmH2O reduction in airway pressure. Tidal volumes were similar during positive pressure and pressure support ventilation with PEEP, but were higher for the former without PEEP Respiratory rate and peak inspiratory flow rate were higher during pressure support than positive pressure ventilation (all P < 0.001). Peak airway pressure (Ppaw), mean airway pressure (Mpaw), peak expiratory flow rate, and expired airway resistance were lower during pressure support than positive pressure ventilation (all P < 0.001). With PEEP set at 10 cmH2O, ETCO2 was lower for pressure support than positive pressure ventilation. During positive pressure ventilation, there was an increase in Ppaw, Mpaw and dynamic compliance (Cdyn) with increasing levels of PEEP (all P < 0.01). During pressure support ventilation, there was an increase in inspired and expired tidal volume, Ppaw, peak inspiratory and expiratory flow rates and Cdyn, and a reduction in ETCO2, work of breathing, and expired airway resistance with increasing levels of PEEP (all P < 0.01). There were no differences in SpO2, non-invasive mean arterial pressure, heart rate or leak fraction. We conclude that pressure support ventilation provides equally effective gas exchange as positive pressure ventilation during PLMA anaesthesia with or without PEEP at the tested settings. During pressure support, PEEP increases ventilation and reduces work on breathing without increasing leak fraction.     

COPD患者肺叶切除术时低潮气量通气的效果

目的 评价慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者行肺叶切除术时低潮气量通气的效果.方法 择期行肺叶切除术的COPD患者28例,年龄65～84岁,ASA Ⅱ或Ⅲ级,随机分为常规潮气量组(TV组,n=14)和低潮气量组(LV组,n=14).均于气管插管后行机械通气,参数设置:TV组潮气量(VT)为10 ml/kg,呼气末正压(PEEP)为0;LV组Vr为5～6 ml/kg,PEEP为0～5 cm H2O.采用旁气流法监测气道峰压(Ppeak)、气道平台压(Pplat)、气道阻力(Raw)及动态肺顺应性(Cd).于平卧位双肺通气10 min(T1)、侧卧位单肺通气90 min(T2)、术毕平卧位双肺通气10 min(T3)及术后24 h(T4)时取桡动脉血样,行血气分析,计算氧合指数(OI)、肺泡.动脉血氧分压差[P(A-a)O2]及呼吸指数(RI);取颈内静脉血样,测定血清肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)及白细胞介素-6(IL-6)的浓度.结果 与T1时比较,2组T2-4时血清TNF-α及IL-6浓度升高(P<0.05);与TV组比较,LV组T2-4时血清TNF-α及IL-6浓度降低(P<0.05),T1-3时Ppeak及Raw降低,T2.3时Cd升高(P<0.05).T1-4时2组OI、RI及P(A-a)O2差异无统计学意义(P0.05).结论 低VT,通气可通过降低炎性反应,减轻COPD患者肺叶切除术时机械通气诱发的肺损伤.     

Positive end-expiratory pressure applied to the dependent lung during one-lung ventilation improves oxygenation and respiratory mechanics in patients with high FEV1

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to test the efficacy of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to the dependent lung during one-lung ventilation, taking into consideration underlying lung function in order to select responders to PEEP. METHODS: Forty-six patients undergoing open-chest thoracic surgical procedures were studied in an operating room of a university hospital. Patients were randomized to receive zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP) or 10 cmH2O of PEEP to the dependent lung during one-lung ventilation in lateral decubitus. The patients were stratified according to preoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) as an indicator of lung function (below or above 72%). Oxygenation was measured in the supine position, in the lateral decubitus with an open chest, and after 20 min of ZEEP or PEEP. The respiratory system pressure-volume curve of the dependent hemithorax was measured in supine and open-chest lateral decubitus positions with a super-syringe. RESULTS: Application of 10 cmH2O of PEEP resulted in a significant increase in PaO2 (P < 0.05). This did not occur in ZEEP group, considered as a time matched control. PEEP improved oxygenation only in patients with high FEV1 (from 11.6+/-4.8 to 15.3+/-7.1 kPa, P < 0.05). There was no significant change in the low FEV1 group. Dependent hemithorax compliance decreased in lateral decubitus, more in patients with high FEV1 (P < 0.05). PEEP improved compliance to a greater extent in patients with high FEV1 (from 33.6+/-3.6 to 48.4+/-3.9 mLcmH2O(-1), P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: During one-lung ventilation in lateral decubitus, PEEP applied to the dependent lung significantly improves oxygenation and respiratory mechanics in patients with rather normal lungs as assessed by high FEV1.     

Both lung recruitment maneuver and PEEP are needed to increase oxygenation and lung volume after cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND: Patients ventilated after cardiac surgery commonly have impaired oxygenation, mainly due to lung collapse. We have previously found that PaO2 and end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) were increased by a lung recruitment maneuver (LRM) followed by positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether only PEEP or only a LRM could give similar effects. METHODS: Thirty circulatory stable patients (aged 55-79 years) mechanically ventilated after cardiac surgery were randomized to receive LRM (four 10-s insufflations to an airway pressure of 45 cmH2O) and zero end-expiratory pressure (LRM-group), PEEP 12 cmH2O (PEEP-group) or LRM in combination with PEEP 12 cmH2O (LRM + PEEP-group). The set end-expiratory pressure was kept for 75 min. Before, during and after the intervention, EELV (SF6 washout technique) and blood gases were measured. RESULTS: Initial EELV and PaO2 were similar in all groups. In the LRM-group, PaO2 and EELV increased transiently (P < 0.0001), but returned at 5 min to the initial values. In the PEEP-group, PaO2 did not change but EELV increased to 155 +/- 27% of the initial value (P < 0.0001). In the LRM+PEEP-group, PaO2 and EELV increased to 212 +/- 66% and 178 +/- 31% of the initial values (P < 0.0001), respectively, and were maintained during PEEP application. CONCLUSION: In patients ventilated after cardiac surgery: (1) PEEP increased lung volume but not PaO2, (2) a lung recruitment maneuver without subsequent PEEP had no sustained effect, and (3) both a lung recruitment maneuver and PEEP were needed to increase and maintain the increased lung volume and PaO2.     

麻醉诱导期开始采用肺保护性通气策略对妇科腔镜手术患者氧合及预后的影响

目的探讨从麻醉诱导期开始采用肺保护性通气策略对妇科腔镜手术患者氧合及预后的影响。方法选择在本院接受妇科腹腔镜手术的患者60例,随机分为三组,每组20例。采用间歇正压通气(IPPV)模式,氧浓度为100%,氧气流量2 L/min,吸呼比为1∶2。A组:从诱导期(即自主呼吸消失后,予面罩机械通气5 min)开始全程通气模式:VT6 ml/kg,RR 16次/分,PEEP为5cm H2O,每30分钟给予一次手法肺复张(手控通气,气道压力维持40 cm H2O,持续30 s);B组:诱导期通气模式:VT10 ml/kg,RR 10次/分,插管后通气模式:VT6 ml/kg,RR 16次/分,PEEP 5cm H2O,每30分钟给予一次手法肺复张;C组:全程通气模式均为VT10 ml/kg,RR 10次/分。记录插管前(T0)、气腹后(T1)、手术开始30 min(T2)、60 min(T3)、放气腹(T4)时的气道峰压(Ppeak)、平均气道压(Pmean)、计算肺顺应性(CL),并在T0、T1、T3、清醒拔管后吸空气5 min(T5)时抽取动脉血进行血气分析,计算氧合指数(OI)及肺内分流率(Qs/Qt)。记录患者术后并发症发生情况与住院天数。结果与T0时比较,T1~T4时三组Ppeak和Pmean均明显升高,C组Ppeak明显高于A组和B组(P0.05),T2时C组Pmean明显高于A组和B组(P0.05);三组CL在气腹后明显降低(P0.05),T3和T4时C组明显低于A组和B组(P0.05);三组PETCO2在气腹后明显升高,T2~T4时C组明显低于A组与B组(P0.05),A组与B组差异无统计学意义;三组OI随着时间延长变化差异无统计学意义,拔管后三组均明显降低(P0.05);三组Qs/Qt随着手术进行呈上升趋势,与T0时比较,三组在T3时明显上升(P0.05),C组明显大于A组和B组(P0.05);T5时均明显下降(P0.05)。术后仅C组有1例发生肺部感染。结论与常规通气相比,对接受妇科腔镜手术患者采用保护性肺通气策略能够明显改善患者的肺顺应性和氧合功能,有利于肺保护。     

Comparison of conventional mandatory ventilation and high frequency oscillatory ventilation for treatment of acute lung injury induced by steam inhalation injury

This study compared pathophysical indexes, respiratory mechanics, circulatory parameters and lung injury scores of acute lung injury (ALI) induced by steam inhalation injury in a New Zealand rabbit model with different ventilatory strategies: a control group which consisted of lower tidal volume (VT 6 ml/kg) and high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) (9 cmH₂O); treatment group which was high frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV). Eighteen rabbits were anaesthetized, sedated, neuromuscular-blocked and ventilated with above two modes at our animal laboratory of burn center. After induction of acute lung injury by steam inhalation, animals were randomizedly assigned to receive either conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) or high frequency oscillatory ventilation and were grouped as CMV and HFOV group. As a result, HFOV attenuated the decrease in oxygenation and pulmonary compliance, alleviated lung tissue damage and inflammatory response. Therefore, HFOV may be a preferable option for treatment of acute lung injury induced by steam inhalation injury.     

The sigh in ARDS (acute respiratory distress syndrome)]

We studied 10 consecutive, sedated and paralyzed patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). The entire study lasted 4 hours, divided in 3 periods: 2 hours of recommended ventilation [lung protective strategy, LPS, i.e., ventilation with low tidal volume (< 8 mL/kg), limiting the plateau at 35 cm H2O, together with high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)], 1 hour of sigh (LPS with 3 consecutive sighs/min at 45 cm H2O plateau pressure), and 1 hour of LPS. Total minute ventilation, PEEP, FiO2 and mean airway pressure were kept constant. The introduction of sighs induced a consistent recruitment and PaO2 improvement, and a decrease in venous admixture and PaCO2. Interrupting sighs and resuming LPS led to a progressive derecruitment, and all the physiological variables returned to baseline. Derecruitment was higher in patients with higher PaCO2 and lower VA/Q ratio. We conclude that: 1) LPS alone does not provide full lung recruitment and best oxygenation in ARDS; 2) application of sigh may provide pressure enough to recruit and volume enough to prevent reabsorption atelectasis.