Influence of statin treatment on platelet inhibition by clopidogrel – a randomized comparison of rosuvastatin,atorvastatin and simvastatin co‐treatment

Objectives. Possible interactions between clopidogrel and atorvastatin, simvastatin or rosuvastatin (a ‘non‐CYP3A4’ metabolized statin) were investigated in a randomized prospective study using sensitive and specific ex vivo platelet function tests. Methods. Patients with coronary artery disease participating in a double‐blind study comparing lipid‐lowering effects of atorvastatin (20–80 mg OD; n = 22) and rosuvastatin (10–40 mg OD; n = 24) were studied before and after 2 weeks treatment with clopidogrel 75 mg OD after completed statin dose titration. In addition, 23 patients were randomized to open‐label simvastatin 40 mg OD. Results. Clopidogrel inhibited 10 μmol L^?1 ADP‐induced platelet aggregation by 40 ± 27%, 57 ± 28% and 51 ± 29%, respectively, in patients on rosuvastatin, atorvastatin and simvastatin treatment. The other platelet tests yielded similar results. No dose‐dependent effects of rosuvastatin or atorvastatin co‐treatment on clopidogrel efficacy were observed. Conclusions. Treatment with CYP3A4 metabolized statins, atorvastatin or simvastatin, did not attenuate the platelet inhibitory effect of clopidogrel maintenance treatment compared with the non‐CYP3A4 metabolized, rosuvastatin.     

Effect of atorvastatin and pravastatin on platelet inhibition by aspirin and clopidogrel treatment in patients with coronary stent thrombosis

We sought to determine a potential interaction between statins and antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel. Previous laboratory studies have shown a possible drug-drug interaction of statins metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A4 and clopidogrel (prodrug metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A4), resulting in an impaired inhibitory effect of clopidogrel on platelet aggregation. However, conclusive prospective data assessing this potentially relevant interaction are lacking. In 73 patients, 23 with previous coronary stent thrombosis (ST) (ST group) and 50 without coronary ST (control group), platelet aggregation was measured 3 times in monthly intervals using light transmission aggregometry (adenosine diphosphate [ADP] and arachidonic acid induction). Measurements were carried out with aspirin monotherapy (100 mg/day), dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin plus clopidogrel (75 mg/day), and additional treatment of 20 mg/day of atorvastatin or 40 mg/day of pravastatin. ADP (5 and 20 micromol)-induced platelet aggregation was significantly decreased with clopidogrel (p <0.001) but remained stable under additional treatment with atorvastatin or pravastatin in the 2 groups. Patients with previous ST showed a higher ADP-induced aggregation level than control subjects. This difference was not influenced by clopidogrel or statin treatment. In conclusion, patients with previous ST show a higher aggregation level than control subjects independent of statin treatment. Atorvastatin and pravastatin do not interfere with the antiaggregatory effect of aspirin and clopidogrel. In conclusion, drug-drug interaction between dual antiplatelet therapy and atorvastatin or pravastatin seems not to be associated with ST.     

Lack of evidence of a clopidogrel-statin interaction in the CHARISMA trial.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential impact of clopidogrel and statin interaction in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial with long-term follow-up. BACKGROUND: There are conflicting data regarding whether statins predominantly metabolized by CYP3A4 reduce the metabolism of clopidogrel to its active metabolite and diminish its clinical efficacy. METHODS: The CHARISMA trial was a randomized trial comparing long-term 75 mg/day clopidogrel versus placebo in patients with cardiovascular disease or multiple risk factors on aspirin. The primary end point was a composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death at median follow-up of 28 months. We performed a secondary analysis evaluating the interaction of clopidogrel versus placebo with statin administration, categorizing baseline statin use to those predominantly CYP3A4 metabolized (atorvastatin, lovastatin, simvastatin; CYP3A4-MET) or others (pravastatin, fluvastatin; non-CYP3A4-MET). RESULTS: Of 15,603 patients enrolled, 10,078 received a statin at baseline (8,245 CYP3A4-MET, 1,748 non-CYP3A4-MET) and 5,496 did not. For the overall population, the primary end point was 6.8% with clopidogrel and 7.3% with placebo (hazard ratio [HR] 0.93; p = 0.22). This was similar among patients on CYP3A4-MET (5.9% clopidogrel, 6.6% placebo, HR 0.89; p = 0.18) or non-CYP3A4-MET statin (5.7% clopidogrel, 7.2% placebo, HR 0.78; p = 0.19). There was no interaction between statin types and randomized treatment (p = 0.69). Patients on atorvastatin (n = 4,127) (5.7% clopidogrel, 7.1% placebo, HR 0.80; p = 0.06) or pravastatin (n = 1,440) (5.1% clopidogrel, 7.0% placebo, HR 0.72; p = 0.13) had similar event rates. CONCLUSIONS: Despite theoretic concerns and ex vivo testing suggesting a potential negative interaction with concomitant clopidogrel and CYP3A4-MET statin administration, there was no evidence of an interaction clinically in a large placebo-controlled trial with long-term follow-up.     

瑞舒伐他汀和阿托伐他汀对氯吡格雷抗血小板活性的影响

目的观察瑞舒伐他汀和阿托伐他汀对氯吡格雷抗血小板活性的影响。方法选择60例冠心病患者接受阿司匹林100mg/d、氯吡格雷75 mg/d及低分子肝素5000 U/12 h治疗,5 d后随机分为阿托伐他汀20mg/d(阿托伐他汀组,30例)和瑞舒伐他汀10 mg/d(瑞舒伐他汀组,30例)。在服用氯吡格雷之前(基线值)、加用他汀类药物之前及服用他汀类药物3d后,用全血阻抗法分别测定不同浓度二磷酸腺苷(5、10、20μmol/L)诱导的血小板聚集率。结果与基线值比较,服用氯吡格雷5 d后和加服他汀类药物治疗3 d后,2组患者血小板聚集率明显降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);与治疗前比较,阿托伐他汀组患者血小板聚集率有所升高,而瑞舒伐他汀组患者血小板聚集率有所下降,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论经细胞色素3A4途径代谢的阿托伐他汀及不经细胞色素3A4代谢的瑞舒伐他汀,短期内对氯吡格雷抗血小板活性无影响。     

The concordance and correlation of measurements by multiple electrode and light transmittance aggregometries based on the pre-defined cutoffs of high and low on-treatment platelet reactivity

The consensus document suggested the definition of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) and future directions. Although multiple platelet function assays have developed based on different mechanisms, inter-assay concordance of HPR identification may be an important pressing need. This study was performed to correlate between the cutoffs of HPR suggested by multiple electrode (MEA) and light transmittance aggregometries (LTA). We enrolled 246 consecutive patients undergoing non-emergent percutaneous coronary intervention after dual antiplatelet therapy. On the basis of consensus document, the cutoffs of HPR to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) were defined as ADPtest ≥ 47?U, and 5 and 20 μM ADP-induced maximal platelet aggregation (MPA) ≥ 46% and 59%, respectively. In addition, the cutoff of low PR (LPR) for major bleeding was selected as ADPtest ≤ 19 U. ADPtest showed moderate correlations with ADP-based LTA data (0.663 ≤ r ≤ 0.710). In the receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis, ADPtest ≥ 47 U was corresponded to 5 and 20 μM ADP-induced MPAs ≥ 46.4% and ≥ 56.8%, respectively. Good agreements were observed between ADPtest ≥?47 U, and 5 μM ADP-induced MPA ≥ 46% (κ=0.537, 80.5% of concordance rate) and 20 μM ADP-induced MPA ≥ 59% (κ=0.564, 81.7% of concordance rate). In the ROC curve analysis for the cutoff of LPR (ADPtest ≤ 19 U), 5 and 20 μM ADP-induced MPAs ≤ 26.6% and ≤ 35.3%, respectively, were suggested as the hypothetical threshold for major bleeding. On the basis of consensus document, the cutoffs of MEA- and LTA-based HPR are well matched. However, the agreement of HPR between assays is moderate, which may implicate the limitation of risk stratification by platelet function testing.     

Multiple antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel are not modulated by statin type in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

We investigated whether statin type or dose influenced the inhibition of platelet function induced by clopidogrel in a prospective, open, parallel group study in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients were taking CYP3A4 metabolised atorvastatin (n = 20) or simvastatin (n = 21), non-CYP3A4 metabolised pravastatin (n = 11) or fluvastatin (n = 2), or no statin therapy (n = 5). ADP and TRAP-induced platelet aggregation were measured using optical aggregometry, whole-blood single-platelet counting, and the Ultegra and Plateletworks point-of-care systems. Platelet pro-coagulant activity (annexin V binding and microparticle formation), P-selectin expression and platelet-leukocyte conjugate formation were assessed by flow cytometry. Platelet responses were measured at baseline, 4 h post clopidogrel 300 mg, and after 10 and 28 days with clopidogrel 75 mg daily. Clopidogrel significantly inhibited both ADP and TRAP-induced platelet responses over time, with steady state inhibition achieved by day 10. This was demonstrated by all techniques used. There was no significant effect of statin type or dose on platelet responses by any method at any time-point. In conclusion, statins do not influence the inhibitory effects of clopidogrel on multiple platelet responses, including aggregation, P-selectin expression, platelet-leucocyte conjugate formation and pro-coagulant responses, in patients undergoing elective PCI.     

Effects of rosuvastatin on platelet inhibition by clopidogrel in cardiovascular patients

Statin interference has been suggested among the mechanisms of reduction of the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel. We thus sought to assess the influence of rosuvastatin on clopidogrel antiplatelet action in high-risk (HR) cardiovascular patients. To set the level of platelet inhibition by combined antithrombotic treatments we retrospectively studied two populations of HR patients, one under aspirin alone, the other under aspirin plus rosuvastatin, before and after addition of clopidogrel. The effects of rosuvastatin compared with atorvastatin were then prospectively investigated in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), under clopidogrel and aspirin treatment. Light transmission platelet aggregation (LTA) was studied in response to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) (5 μM) or arachidonic acid (0.5 mM). The inhibitory effect of clopidogrel in reducing ADP-induced LTA was similar in the two HR groups of patients. No difference in ADP-induced platelet aggregation was observed in the two PCI groups of patients with either atorvastatin or rosuvastatin. In conclusion, rosuvastatin does not interfere with the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel in patients with cardiovascular disease.     

The concordance and correlation of measurements by multiple electrode and light transmittance aggregometries based on the pre-defined cutoffs of high and low on-treatment platelet reactivity

The consensus document suggested the definition of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) and future directions. Although multiple platelet function assays have developed based on different mechanisms, inter-assay concordance of HPR identification may be an important pressing need. This study was performed to correlate between the cutoffs of HPR suggested by multiple electrode (MEA) and light transmittance aggregometries (LTA). We enrolled 246 consecutive patients undergoing non-emergent percutaneous coronary intervention after dual antiplatelet therapy. On the basis of consensus document, the cutoffs of HPR to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) were defined as ADPtest?≥?47?U, and 5 and 20?µM ADP-induced maximal platelet aggregation (MPA)?≥?46% and 59%, respectively. In addition, the cutoff of low PR (LPR) for major bleeding was selected as ADPtest?≤?19?U. ADPtest showed moderate correlations with ADP-based LTA data (0.663?≤?r?≤?0.710). In the receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis, ADPtest?≥?47?U was corresponded to 5 and 20?µM ADP-induced MPAs?≥?46.4% and ≥56.8%, respectively. Good agreements were observed between ADPtest?≥?47?U, and 5?µM ADP-induced MPA?≥?46% (κ?=?0.537, 80.5% of concordance rate) and 20?µM ADP-induced MPA?≥?59% (κ?=?0.564, 81.7% of concordance rate). In the ROC curve analysis for the cutoff of LPR (ADPtest?≤?19?U), 5 and 20?µM ADP-induced MPAs?≤?26.6% and ≤35.3%, respectively, were suggested as the hypothetical threshold for major bleeding. On the basis of consensus document, the cutoffs of MEA- and LTA-based HPR are well matched. However, the agreement of HPR between assays is moderate, which may implicate the limitation of risk stratification by platelet function testing.     

急性冠状动脉综合征冠状动脉支架术后应用他汀类药物对氯吡格雷抗血小板作用无影响

目的探讨急性冠状动脉综合征（ACS）患者行冠状动脉支架术后服用阿托伐他汀或普伐他汀对氯吡格雷抗血小板作用的影响。方法研究对象为150例2006年4至12月成功实施冠状动脉支架术的住院ACS患者,术后第1天起随机接受阿托伐他汀20mg／d（n=50）、普伐他汀20mg／d（／7,=50）或无他汀（n=50）治疗。围术期抗血小板治疗为阿司匹林300mg／d,当天氯吡格雷负荷量300mg,继以维持量75mg／d。观测各组患者术后第1天（基线值）及第3天的血小板膜糖蛋白P-选择素（CD62P）、血小板活化复合物（PAC-1）表达及20μmol／L二磷酸腺苷（ADP）诱导的血小板最大聚集率（MPAR）。结果三组患者临床及CD62P、PAC-1和MPAR的基线值差异均无统计学意义。各观测指标第二次测定值与基线值的差值显示,阿托伐他汀、普伐他汀和无他汀组的ACD62P[（4．69±16．78）％、（1．35±10．86）％和（2．97±10．21）％]、APAC-1[（12．78±22．07）％、（8．01±21．23）％和（10．65±21．39）％l及AMPAR[（5．44±18．68）％、（7．15±19．59）％和（3．76±23．42）％]差异均无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。急性心肌梗死患者亚组分析结果表明,ACD62P[（7．50±19．35）％、（3．24±11．18）％和（2．53±8．87）％]、APAC-1[（13．40±24．62）％、（11．28±19．90）％和（10．11±21．29）％]及AMPAR[（7．56±19．11）％、（7．87±23．60）％和（6．75±23．30）％]三组间差异亦均无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。结论接受冠状动脉支架术的ACS患者服用阿托伐他汀或普伐他汀后,短期内未发现对氯吡格雷的抗血小板作用产生显著影响。     

Genetic determinants of platelet response to clopidogrel

Antiplatelet agents are the mainstay treatment in the prevention and management of atherothrombotic complications. However, a substantial interpatient variability in response to clopidogrel has been reported. Furthermore, patients with coronary artery disease and lesser platelet inhibition in response to clopidogrel are at increased risk for cardiovascular events. Clopidogrel after absorption requires two-step oxidation by the hepatic cytochrome P450 to generate its active metabolite. Polymorphisms of genes encoding the cytochrome enzymes and P-glycoprotein involved in clopidogrel absorption are regarded as major determinants of the interindividual variability in the clopidogrel-induced platelet inhibition. In our review we discuss the prevalence and clinical significance of various alleles of the genes: CYP2C19 and ABCB1 in the setting of coronary artery disease. Allele CYP2C19*2 is associated with excess of ischaemic events including myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis. On the other hand, CYP2C19*17 allele poses a serious threat of bleeding. Data concerning the prognostic value of genetic variant 3435C→T of ABCB1 remain inconclusive.     

阿托伐他汀或瑞舒伐他汀与氯吡格雷合用在非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者支架置入术后的近期疗效比较

目的比较阿托伐他汀或瑞舒伐他汀与氯吡格雷合用在非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)支架置入术后患者的近期疗效。方法共154例NSTE-ACS的患者接受支架置入术后,随机分为服用阿托伐他汀组(74例)及服用瑞舒伐他汀组(80例),术前服用阿司匹林(100mg)5 d、氯吡格雷(75 mg)5 d以上或术前12 h以上顿服氯吡格雷300 mg及阿司匹林片300 mg,于术前服抗血小板药前、手术当天、术后3、7 d及术后1、6个月抽取静脉血测定二磷酸腺苷(ADP)(浓度为10μmol/L)诱导的血小板聚集功能,观察住院期间及6个月的主要不良心脏事件(MACE)。结果两组患者的临床基线资料及服药情况差异无统计学意义,服用氯吡格雷(75 mg)5 d或顿服300 mg能达到明显的血小板聚集率抑制作用,血小板聚集率在阿托伐他汀组由基线的(57.2±10.3)%降至手术当日的(32.5±11.2)%,而瑞舒伐他汀组分别为(59.1±9.8)%和(30.4±10.1)%(均为P<0.01),而且这种抑制作用稳定持续至6个月之后。6个月时两组间总的MACE发生率差异无统计学意义(13.0%比15.0%,P>0.05),两组心原性死亡、非致死性心肌梗死、靶血管重建术、支架内血栓形成及出血事件差异均无统计学意义(均为P>0.05)。结论接受冠脉支架置入术的NSTE-ACS患者,服用阿托伐他汀或瑞舒伐他汀后,短期内未发现对氯吡格雷抗血小板作用产生显著影响,且两组间的近期疗效相近。     

Effect of cytochrome p450 polymorphisms on platelet reactivity after treatment with clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome

Genetic polymorphisms of cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoforms may promote variability in platelet response to clopidogrel. This study was conducted to analyze, in 603 patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes, the effect of CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and CYP2C19 gene polymorphisms on clopidogrel response and post-treatment platelet reactivity assessed by adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet aggregation, vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation index, and ADP-induced P-selectin expression. The CYP2C19*2 polymorphism was significantly associated with ADP-induced platelet aggregation, vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation index, and ADP-induced P-selectin expression in recessive (p <0.01, p <0.007, and p <0.06, respectively) and codominant (p <0.08, p <0.0001, and p <0.009, respectively) models, but the CYP3A4*1B and CYP3A5*3 polymorphisms were not. The CYP2C19*2 allele carriers exhibited the highest platelet index levels in multivariate analysis (p = 0.03). After covariate adjustment, the CYP2C19*2 allele was more frequent in clopidogrel nonresponders, defined by persistent high post-treatment platelet reactivity (ADP-induced platelet aggregation >70%; p = 0.03). In conclusion, the present data suggest that the CYPC19*2 allele influences post-treatment platelet reactivity and clopidogrel response in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes.     

Effects of atorvastatin and rosuvastatin on thromboxane-dependent platelet activation and oxidative stress in hypercholesterolemia

ObjectivesWe examined the time-dependent effects of atorvastatin and rosuvastatin on in vivo oxidative stress and platelet activation, to assess whether these phenomena are related to any pleiotropic effect of any statin or to their LDL-lowering effect. We also asked whether the presence of specific allele frequencies in carriers of the 3′UTR/lectin-like oxidized LDL receptor-1 (LOX-1) polymorphism may influence the effect of either statin.MethodsWe included 60 hypercholesterolemic subjects, previously screened for LOX-1 3′UTR polymorphism, randomized, according to genetic profile (15 T and 15 C carriers for each arm), to atorvastatin 20 mg/day or rosuvastatin 10 mg/day.ResultsAfter 8 weeks, atorvastatin and rosuvastatin were associated with comparable, significant reductions in LDL cholesterol (40.8% and 43.6%, respectively), plasma hs-CRP (9.5% vs. 13.8%), urinary 11-dehydro-thromboxane (TX) B₂ (38.9% vs. 27.1%) and 8-iso-prostaglandin (PG) F_2α (39.4% vs. 19.4%). The impact of rosuvastatin or atorvastatin on CRP, 8-iso-PGF_2α, and 11-dehydro-TXB₂ did not differ according to the LOX-1 haplotype. On multiple regression analyses, only CRP and LDL were independent predictors of 11-dehydro-TXB₂, and only LDL was a significant predictor of 8-iso-PGF_2α.ConclusionsBoth atorvastatin and rosuvastatin cause comparable reductions of thromboxane-dependent platelet activation, lipid peroxidation and inflammation. The presence of 3′UTR/LOX-1 polymorphism does not affect the changes induced by either statin.     

The P2Y1 receptor, necessary but not sufficient to support full ADP-induced platelet aggregation, is not the target of the drug clopidogrel

Recently we showed that the P2Y₁ receptor coupled to calcium mobilization is necessary to initiate ADP-induced human platelet aggregation. Since the thienopyridine compound clopidogrel specifically inhibits ADP-induced platelet aggregation, it was of interest to determine whether the P2Y₁ receptor was the target of this drug. Therefore we studied the effects of clopidogrel and of the two specific P2Y₁ antagonists A2P5P and A3P5P on ADP-induced platelet events in rats. Although clopidogrel treatment (50 mg/kg) greatly reduced platelet aggregation in response to ADP as compared to untreated platelets, some residual aggregation was still detectable. In contrast, A2P5P and A3P5P totally abolished ADP-induced shape change and aggregation in platelets from both control and clopidogrel-treated rats. A2P5P and A3P5P (100 μM ) totally inhibited the [Ca²⁺]_i rise induced by ADP (0.1 μM ) in control and clopidogrel-treated platelets, whereas clopidogrel treatment had no effect. Conversely, the inhibition of adenylyl cyclase induced by ADP (5 μM ) was completely blocked by clopidogrel but not modified by A2P5P or A3P5P (100 μM ). A3P5P (1 m M ) reduced the number of [³³P]2MeSADP binding sites on control rat platelets from 907 ± 50 to 611 ± 25 per platelet. After clopidogrel treatment, binding of [³³P]2MeSADP decreased to 505 ± 68 sites per platelet and further decreased to 55 ± 12 sites in the presence of A3P5P (1 m M ). In summary, these results demonstrate that the platelet P2Y₁ receptor responsible for the initiation of aggregation in response to ADP is not the target of clopidogrel. Platelets may express another, as yet unidentified, P2Y receptor, specifically coupled to the inhibition of adenylyl cyclase and necessary to induce full platelet aggregation, which could be the target of this drug.     

他汀类药对氯吡格雷抗血小板作用的影响

目的 前瞻性评价普伐他汀、氟伐他汀、阿托伐他汀对氯吡格雷抗血小板作用的影响.方法 人选连续1015例急性冠状动脉综合征或稳定性心绞痛行冠状动脉造影和(或)支架术患者,分为普伐他汀组(228例)、氟伐他汀组(179例)、阿托伐他汀组(481例)和对照组(127例).比较各组术后支架内血栓发生率、不同浓度(2、5、10、20 μmol)二磷酸腺苷(ADP)诱导的1 min(ADP-1)、5 min(ADP-5)和最大血小板聚集力(ADP-M)及其影响因素.结果 4组患者基础临床情况(除年龄、高血压及冠状动脉造影复查率外)和冠状动脉病变和(或)支架术情况相似,术后支架内血栓发生率(普伐他汀组0.9%、氟伐他汀组1.1%、阿托伐他汀组1.0%、对照组0.8%,P>0.05)和ADP-1、ADP-5、ADP-M与对照组相比差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05).多因素回归分析显示,年龄(B=0.21,P=0.001)、氯吡格雷总量(B=7.30,P=0.002)及低分子肝素的使用(OR=6.71,P=0.01)是影响氯吡格雷抗血小板作用的独立决定因素.结论 普伐他汀、氟伐他汀和阿托伐他汀对氯吡格雷的抗血小板作用无明显影响,而年龄、氯吡格雷总量及低分子肝素使用是决定氯吡格雷抗血小板作用的独立因素.     

Effects of switching statins on lipid and apolipoprotein ratios in the MERCURY I study

BACKGROUND: Lipid ratios are clinically useful markers of coronary artery disease (CAD) risk. The effects of rosuvastatin, atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin on lipid ratios were investigated in the Measuring Effective Reductions in Cholesterol Using Rosuvastatin TherapY (MERCURY) I trial. METHODS: This trial was conducted in 3140 hypercholesterolemic patients with CAD, atherosclerosis, type 2 diabetes mellitus, or a 20% 10-year risk for CAD. Patients were randomized to rosuvastatin 10 mg, atorvastatin 10 or 20 mg, simvastatin 20 mg, or pravastatin 40 mg for 8 weeks; all patients except those receiving rosuvastatin 10 mg either were switched to rosuvastatin 10 or 20 mg or remained on initial treatment for 8 more weeks. RESULTS: At 8 weeks, reductions in total cholesterol (TC):high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol:HDL-C, non-HDL-C:HDL-C, and apolipoprotein (apo) B:apo A-I ratios with rosuvastatin 10 mg were significantly greater than those with atorvastatin 10 mg, atorvastatin 20 mg, simvastatin 20 mg, and pravastatin 40 mg (P<0.0001 for all). At week 16, switching to rosuvastatin 10 mg from atorvastatin 10 mg, simvastatin 20 mg, and pravastatin 40 mg and to rosuvastatin 20 mg from atorvastatin 20 mg produced significantly greater reductions in all lipid ratios (P< or =0.0001 for all). Switching to rosuvastatin 10 mg from atorvastatin 20 mg produced significantly greater reductions in TC:HDL-C (P<0.025) and apo B:apo A-I (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Rosuvastatin 10 mg reduces lipid ratios more than equivalent and higher doses of other statins; switching to equal or lower doses of rosuvastatin produces significantly improved reductions in lipid ratios.     

Intensified P2Y12 inhibition for high-on treatment platelet reactivity

High on treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) during treatment with clopidogrel has been consistently found to be strong risk factor for recurrent ischemic events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Insufficient P2Y12 receptor inhibition contributes to HPR measured by the VerifyNow (VN) assay. Prasugrel and ticagrelor are more potent P2Y12 inhibitors than clopidogrel and commonly substituted for clopidogrel when HPR is documented, however benefit of VN guided intensified antiplatelet therapy is uncertain. We identified patients who had undergone platelet reactivity testing after PCI with VN after pretreatment with clopidogrel (n?=?252) in a single center observational analysis. Patients who had HPR defined as PRU?>?208 were switched to alternate P2Y12 inhibitors. Primary clinical endpoint was 1-year post PCI combined cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), and stent thrombosis. One hundred and eight (43%) subjects had HPR and were switched to prasugrel (n?=?60) and ticagrelor (n?=?48). Risk of recurrent 1-year primary endpoint remained higher for HPR patients switched to either ticagrelor or prasugrel as compared to subjects who had low on treatment platelet reactivity (n?=?144) (LPR) on clopidogrel [Hazard Ratio: 3.5 (95% CI 1.1–11.1); p?=?0.036)]. Propensity score matched analysis demonstrated higher event rates in patients with HPR on alternate P2Y12 inhibitor as compared to patients with LPR (log-rank: p?=?0.044). The increased risk of recurrent events associated with HPR measured by VN is not completely attenuated by switching to more potent P2Y12 inhibitors. Non-P2Y12 mediated pathways likely contribute to increased incidence of thrombotic events after PCI in subjects with HPR.

     

Effects of switching statins on achievement of lipid goals: measuring effective reductions in cholesterol using rosuvastatin therapy (MERCURY I) study

Background

In a multinational trial (4522IL/0081), we assessed the effects of switching to low doses of rosuvastatin from commonly used doses of atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal achievement in high-risk patients.

Methods

Hypercholesterolemic patients (n = 3140) with coronary heart disease, atherosclerosis, or type 2 diabetes were randomized to open-label rosuvastatin 10 mg, atorvastatin 10 or 20 mg, simvastatin 20 mg, or pravastatin 40 mg for 8 weeks. Patients either remained on these treatments for another 8 weeks or switched treatments from atorvastatin 10 mg, simvastatin 20 mg, and pravastatin 40 mg to rosuvastatin 10 mg or from atorvastatin 20 mg to rosuvastatin 10 or 20 mg. The primary efficacy measure was the proportion of patients reaching the Joint European Societies' LDL-C goal (<116 mg/dL) at week 16. For measures of cholesterol goal achievement, treatment arms were compared using logistic-regression analysis.

Results

Significant improvement in LDL-C goal achievement was found for patients who switched to rosuvastatin 10 mg, compared with patients who remained on atorvastatin 10 mg (86% vs 80%, P < .05), simvastatin 20 mg (86% vs 72%, P < .0001), and pravastatin 40 mg (88% vs 66%, P < .0001), and between patients switched to rosuvastatin 20 mg and those who remained on atorvastatin 20 mg (90% vs 84%, P < .01). Similar results were found for achievement of the European combined LDL-C and total cholesterol goals and National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III LDL-C goals. All statins were well tolerated over 16 weeks.

Conclusions

We demonstrated that switching to a more efficacious statin is an effective strategy to improve lipid goal achievement in patients requiring lipid-lowering therapy.     

大鼠模型中糖尿病导致氯吡格雷治疗后血小板高反应性的机制研究

目的在大鼠模型中探讨糖尿病对氯吡格雷治疗后血小板高反应性(HTPR)的影响及其可能的影响机制。方法造模成功的雄性SD大鼠45只,随机分为空白组11只、氯吡格雷组11只、糖尿病组11只和糖尿病+氯吡格雷组(实验组)12只,普通饲料饲养8周,采用灌胃法给予氯吡格雷,糖尿病模型采用链脲佐菌素(STZ)一次性注射法建立。流式细胞术检测CD62P水平和细胞质内Ca2+水平,ELISA法检测同型半胱氨酸(Hcy)、高敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)、超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、丙二醛(MDA)、血栓素A2(TXA2)、前列环素(PGI2)及NO等水平,RT-PCR和Westernblot检测细胞色素450(CYP450)、蛋白激酶C(PKC)及P2Y12受体基因和蛋白表达。结果糖尿病组和实验组血糖、Hcy、MDA、TXA2、hs-CRP水平、P2Y12基因和蛋白及PKC蛋白表达显著高于空白组和氯吡格雷组(P<0.01);PGI2、SOD及NO、ADP诱导的血小板聚集抑制率(ADP-IR)、CYP450蛋白表达显著低于空白组和氯吡格雷组(P<0.01)。实验组ADP-IR显著低于糖尿病组[(45.64±13.31)%vs(80.14±4.30)%,P<0.01]。糖尿病组CD62P、细胞质内Ca2+水平明显高于其他组(P<0.01);且实验组明显高于空白组和氯吡格雷组(P<0.05,P<0.01);氯吡格雷组细胞质内Ca2+水平显著低于空白组(P<0.05)。各组PKC和CYP450基因表达比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。ADP-IR与SOD和TXA2水平呈负相关(P<0.05,P<0.01);CD62P水平与细胞质内Ca2+水平呈正相关(P<0.01)。ADP-IR与CD62P水平呈负相关(r=-0.3567,P=0.015)。结论糖尿病导致氯吡格雷HTPR的机制为血小板功能异常、血小板表面受体表达上调及氯吡格雷活化相关酶系表达减少。