Hemodynamic effect of Carvedilol vs. propranolol in cirrhotic patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Background. Carvedilol appears to be more effective than propranolol in the treatment of portal hypertension in cirrhotic patients.Aim. To compare the effects of carvedilol vs. propranolol on systemic and splanchnic haemodynamics and to evaluate the adverse events associated with these treatments.Material and methods. We performed a systematic review following the Cochrane and PRISMA recommendations. Randomised controlled trials comparing carvedilol versus propranolol, in the treatment of portal hypertension in cirrhotic patients with oesophageal varices, with or without bleeding history were included. The primary outcome measure was the haemodynamic response to treatment.Results. Four randomised trials and 153 patients were included; 79 patients received carvedilol (6.25-50 mg/d) and 74 patients received propranolol (10-320 mg/d). The hepatic vein pressure gradient (HVPG) decreased more with carvedilol than with propranolol (MD -2.21; 95% CI: −2.83 to −1.60, I² = 0%, P < 0.00001). Carvedilol was superior to propranolol for reducing HVPG by ≥ 20% from the baseline value or to ≤ 12 mmHg (OR: 2.93; 95% CI: 1.50 to 5.74, I² = 22%, P = 0.002). Overall adverse events did not differ between. In conclusion, there is limited evidence suggesting that carvedilol is more effective than propranolol for improving the haemodynamic response in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension. Long-term randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm this information.     

Acute and 7-day portal pressure response to carvedilol and propranolol in cirrhotics

BACKGROUND: Carvedilol, a non-selective beta- and alpha-1 blocking agent, has portal hypotensive action. This study evaluates the acute and 7-day response to carvedilol, and compares it to that of propranolol. METHODS: Thirty-six cirrhotics were randomized into two groups of 18 each, and treated with carvedilol or propranolol. Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) was measured before and 90 min after either 25 mg carvedilol or 80 mg propranolol was administered orally, and again 7 days after 12.5 mg carvedilol daily or 80 mg propranolol daily, respectively. 'Responders' were defined as those with HVPG reduction of > or = 20%. RESULTS: With carvedilol, 11/18(61.1%) and 11/17(64.7%) patients responded acutely and after 7 days, respectively, while 9/18(50%) and 10/16(62.5%) did so to propranolol. However, HVPG reduction (percent) by carvedilol was not superior to that by propranolol either acutely (27.67 +/- 31.49 compared to 22.98 +/- 27.40, P = 0.6) or after 7 days (28.2 +/- 29.05 compared to 23.25 +/- 20.15, P = 0.6). With carvedilol, the acute HVPG response (P < 0.001) and responder status (P = 0.018) were good predictors of the response after 7 days, but were weak predictors in the case of propranolol (0.1 > P > 0.05 and P = 0.059, respectively). On carvedilol, only one patient (with ascites) developed symptomatic systemic hypotension with oliguria. CONCLUSION: Carvedilol is a relatively safe, effective portal hypotensive agent, both acutely and over 7 days, but not superior to propranolol, at least in Indians. The acute hemodynamic response seems promising in predicting long-term response.     

Effects of carvedilol on oxidative stress and chronotropic response to exercise in patients with chronic heart failure

BACKGROUND: Our previous studies suggest that the increase in heart rate from rest to peak exercise is reduced in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and this is associated with increased oxidative stress, as determined by malondialdehyde (MDA) plasma levels. AIM: To investigate the effects of carvedilol on the heart rate response to exercise and oxidative stress in patients with CHF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty stable NYHA classes II-III CHF patients received carvedilol therapy for 6 months, at a mean maintenance dose of 25 mg (range 6.25-50 mg/day). After treatment, the patients showed a significant improvement in their functional NYHA class (p=0.013), increased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (24+/-1.4% to 31+/-2.3%, p=0.003) and 6-min walk distance (499+/-18 to 534+/-18 m, p=0.03), without changes in the peak VO2. At baseline, norepinephrine (NE) plasma levels increased with exercise (510+/-51 to 2513+/-230 pg/mL, p<0.001), and these levels were not affected by carvedilol. Chronotropic responsiveness index (increase in heart rate divided by the increase in NE from rest to peak exercise) was not changed by carvedilol (0.049+/-0.001 to 0.042+/-0.001, p=0.6). MDA levels of CHF patients decreased after treatment with carvedilol (2.4+/-0.2 to 1.1+/-0.2 microM, p<0.001), without changes in antioxidant enzyme activities. CONCLUSIONS: Carvedilol treatment in patients with CHF results in reduced oxidative stress without restoration of the chronotropic responsiveness index.     

Carvedilol reduces plasma 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine in mild to moderate hypertension: a pilot study

The purpose of this pilot study was to test whether carvedilol has a protective effect against oxidative deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) damage in human hypertension in vivo. Carvedilol's antioxidant effect has mostly focused on lipid or amino acid so far. However, there has been no data that carvedilol reduces DNA damage in human hypertension. Never-treated mild to moderate hypertension patients and age- and sex-matched control subjects volunteered for the study. The hypertension subjects were given 12.5 or 25 mg of carvedilol or hydrochlorothiazide orally for 2 months and controls were not given any. Fasting blood samples were collected before and after carvedilol. Plasma highly sensitive 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (hs8-OHdG) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) were checked with the samples. There were no statistical differences in clinical characteristics in 3 groups. The hs8-OHdG declined from 9.07+/-4.23 ng/mL to 5.74+/-3.89 ng/mL (P=0.002) after carvedilol. However, it did not show significant reduction after hydrochlorothiazide (9.01+/-3.89 versus 8.23+/-4.12 ng/mL; P=NS). In the control group, the hs8-OHdG concentration was 3.41+/-2.03 ng/mL and 3.01+/-2.65 ng/mL at baseline and 2 months later, respectively (P=NS). The baseline hs8-OHdG levels were higher in hypertension groups compared with control (P=0.000). The hsCRP had no significant difference before and after the tested drugs in 2 hypertension groups (group A: 0.21+/-0.51 versus 0.19+/-0.37 mg/dL; group B: 0.20+/-0.45 versus 0.18+/-0.42 mg/dL). In conclusion, DNA damage caused by reactive oxygen species occurs more in the hypertension patients than normals. Carvedilol significantly reduces DNA damage in the hypertension patients.     

Reduction of oxidative stress by carvedilol: role in maintenance of ischaemic myocardium viability

OBJECTIVES: To differentiate the impact of the beta-blocking and the anti-oxidant activity of carvedilol in maintaining myocardium viability. METHODS: Isolated rabbit hearts, subjected to aerobic perfusion, or low-flow ischaemia followed by reperfusion, were treated with two doses of carvedilol, one dose (2.0 microM) with marked negative inotropic effect due to beta-blockage and the other (0.1 microM) with no beta-blockage nor negative inotropism. Carvedilol was compared with two doses of propranolol, 1.0 - without - and 5.0 microM - with negative inotropic effect. Anti-oxidant activity was measured as the capacity to counteract the occurrence of oxidative stress and myocardium viability as recovery of left ventricular function on reperfusion, membrane damage and energetic status. RESULTS: Carvedilol counteracted the ischemia and reperfusion induced oxidative stress: myocardial content of reduced glutathione, protein and non-protein sulfhydryl groups after ischaemia and particularly after reperfusion, was higher in hearts treated with carvedilol, while the myocardial content of oxidised glutathione was significantly reduced (0.30+/-0.03 and 0.21+/-0.02 vs. 0.39+/-0.03 nmol/mg prot, both P<0.01, in 0.1 and 2.0 microM). At the same time, carvedilol improved myocardium viability independently from its beta-blocking effect. On the contrary, propranolol maintained viability only at the higher dose, although to a lesser extent than carvedilol. This suggests that the effects of propranolol are dependent on energy saving due to negative inotropism. The extra-protection observed with carvedilol at both doses is likely due to its anti-oxidant effect. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that the anti-oxidant activity of carvedilol is relevant for the maintenance of myocardium viability.     

Prevalence and predictors of dyslipidemia in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.

PURPOSE: Women with polycystic ovary syndrome are hyperandrogenemic and insulin resistant, which are associated with alterations in circulating lipid and lipoprotein levels. We sought to determine the prevalence of, and risk factors for, lipid abnormalities in these women. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Non-Hispanic white women with polycystic ovary syndrome (n = 195) and ethnically matched control women (n = 62) had fasting blood obtained for hormone and lipid levels. Subjects were categorized by body mass index (nonobese <27 kg/m(2), obese > or =27 kg/m(2)), and analyses were adjusted for age. RESULTS: Total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels increased significantly in obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome (n = 153) compared with obese control women (n = 35; mean difference in total cholesterol level = 29 mg/dL; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 14 to 45 mg/dL; P <0.001; mean difference in LDL-C level = 16 mg/dL; 95% CI: 4 to 30 mg/dL; P = 0.006). Similarly, total cholesterol and LDL-C levels increased significantly in nonobese women with polycystic ovary syndrome (n = 42) compared with nonobese control women (n = 27; mean difference in total cholesterol = 32 mg/dL; 95% CI: 13 to 52 mg/dL; P <0.001; mean difference in LDL-C level = 32 mg/dL; 95% CI: 15 to 52 mg/dL; P <0.001). In obese women, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglyceride levels increased significantly in women with polycystic ovary syndrome compared with control women (mean difference in HDL-C level = 6 mg/dL; 95% CI: 2 to 12 mg/dL; P = 0.002; mean difference in triglyceride level = 34 mg/dL; 95% CI: 1 to 77 mg/dL; P = 0.04). Differences in LDL-C and HDL-C levels, but not triglyceride levels, remained significant after adjusting for alcohol intake, smoking, and exercise. Although age, body mass index, and polycystic ovary syndrome status were significant predictors of lipid levels, these factors accounted for no more than 25% of the variance. CONCLUSIONS: In this large study of non-Hispanic white women, elevations in LDL-C levels were the predominant lipid abnormality in women with polycystic ovary syndrome, independent of obesity. The characteristic dyslipidemia of insulin resistance was absent. Indeed, obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome had relatively elevated HDL-C levels, which may confer some protection against cardiovascular disease.     

Randomized comparison of long-term carvedilol and propranolol administration in the treatment of portal hypertension in cirrhosis

Short-term carvedilol administration is more powerful than propranolol in decreasing hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) in cirrhotic patients, but induces arterial hypotension that may prevent its long-term use in portal hypertensive patients. This study compared the HVPG reduction and safety of long-term carvedilol and propranolol. Fifty-one cirrhotic patients were randomly assigned to receive carvedilol (n = 26) and propranolol (n = 25). Hemodynamic measurements and renal function were assessed at baseline and after 11.1 +/- 4.1 weeks. Carvedilol caused a greater decrease in HVPG than popranolol (-19 +/- 2% vs. -12 +/- 2%; P <.001). The proportion of patients achieving an HVPG reduction >/=20% or 相似文献   

Cardioprotective effects of carvedilol, a novel beta adrenoceptor antagonist with vasodilating properties, in anaesthetised minipigs: comparison with propranolol.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate in a minipig model of acute myocardial infarction the cardioprotection provided by the beta adrenoceptor blocking and vasodilating activities present in carvedilol; comparison was made to the pure beta adrenoceptor antagonist, propranolol. METHODS: Experiments were performed in 25 Yucatan minipigs (9-12 kg), randomly assigned to receive vehicle (n = 7), carvedilol 0.3 mg.kg-1 (n = 6), carvedilol 1 mg.kg-1 (n = 6), or propranolol 1 mg.kg-1 (n = 6). Myocardial infarction was produced by occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery for 45 min followed by 4 h of reperfusion. Vehicle, carvedilol (0.3 and 1 mg.kg-1) or propranolol (1 mg.kg-1) were given intravenously 15 min before the coronary artery occlusion. At the end of the reperfusion period, infarct size was determined using Evans blue dye and triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining. Infarct volumes were visualised using computer assisted three dimensional image analysis of the stained myocardial tissue sections. Myeloperoxidase activity was measured in tissue samples removed from normal, infarcted, and at risk areas. RESULTS: Carvedilol (1 mg.kg-1) reduced infarct size by over 90% without producing pronounced changes in systemic haemodynamic variables. The ability of carvedilol to reduce infarct size was clearly dose dependent. Thus infarct size, which represented 27.5(SEM 2.3)% of the area at risk in the vehicle treated group, was only 13.1(4.0)% (p < 0.05) and 2.4(1.5)% (p < 0.01) in pigs treated with carvedilol at 0.3 and 1 mg.kg-1, respectively. In animals treated with propranolol (1 mg.kg-1), infarct size represented 10.9(2.4)% of the area at risk (p < 0.05). The 60% and 91% reductions in infarct size produced by propranolol (1 mg.kg-1) and carvedilol (1 mg.kg-1), respectively, were clearly evident upon three dimensional image analysis. The reduction in infarct size was significantly greater for carvedilol (1 mg.kg-1) compared to propranolol (1 mg.kg-1) at equivalent beta adrenoceptor blocking doses. Pretreatment with propranolol did not reduce the increases in myeloperoxidase activity observed in the area at risk or in the infarcted area. In contrast, carvedilol produced a dose dependent reduction in myeloperoxidase activity in these areas. CONCLUSIONS: Carvedilol limits myocardial necrosis resulting from coronary artery occlusion and reperfusion in a more pronounced manner than the pure beta adrenoceptor antagonist, propranolol. The cardioprotective effect of carvedilol, which reduced infarct size by 91%, may result from the combined effects of beta adrenoceptor blockade and vasodilatation, and possibly also from inhibition of intracellular calcium overload in cardiac cells resulting from antagonism of myocardial alpha 1 adrenoceptors and/or calcium channel blockade. The cardioprotection provided by carvedilol may ultimately be of benefit in hypertensive patients who are at risk for acute myocardial infarction.     

Acute administration of carvedilol is more effective than propranolol plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate in the reduction of portal pressure in patients with viral cirrhosis

OBJECTIVE: Propranolol is known to decrease portal pressure in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension; however, a substantial number of patients do not respond to propranolol administration. The addition of isosorbide-5-mononitrate may enhance portal pressure reduction in patients receiving propranolol. Carvedilol is a nonselective beta-blocker with alpha(1)-adrenergic blocking activity. It has been shown to decrease portal pressure in cirrhotic patients. Additionally, carvedilol has a greater portal hypotensive effect than propranolol alone in patients with cirrhosis. The current study is aimed at comparing the acute hemodynamic effects of carvedilol with the effects of propranolol plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate in patients with viral cirrhosis. METHODS: Patients with viral cirrhosis were randomly assigned to receive an oral administration of carvedilol of 25 mg (n = 11) or an oral administration of propranolol 40 mg plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate 20 mg (n = 11). Hemodynamic values were measured at basal and 90 min after drugs administration. RESULTS: Both carvedilol and propranolol plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate significantly decreased cardiac index, heart rate, and HVPG. The magnitude of changes in HVPG observed between the basal and after drugs administration was greater in patients receiving carvedilol than in those receiving propranolol plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate (-18.6 +/- 3.6%vs-10.1 +/- 3.6%, p < 0.05). Hepatic blood flow increased following carvedilol administration but remained unchanged in patients receiving propranolol plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate. The magnitude of decrease in mean arterial pressure (MAP) did not differ between the two groups of patients. CONCLUSION: In our patients with viral cirrhosis, carvedilol is more effective than propranolol plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate in the reduction of HVPG. Carvedilol administration causes an increase in hepatic blood flow, but its systemic effects were similar to those of propranolol plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate.     

Effects of antirheumatic therapy on serum lipid levels in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective study

BACKGROUND: Patients with newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis have adverse serum lipid profiles. We sought to determine the effects of treating rheumatoid arthritis with antirheumatic drugs on these abnormal lipid levels. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We studied 42 patients with newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis who had not been treated with corticosteroids or disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. We measured serum lipid profiles at baseline and 1 year later, and determined whether there were differences in the changes in lipid levels between patients who met the American College of Rheumatology criteria for a 20% improvement in rheumatoid arthritis and those who did not. RESULTS: Of the 42 patients, 27 (64%) met the criteria for a 20% improvement in rheumatoid arthritis during the 12-month study. In these patients, mean high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels increased by 21% (P <0.001), apolipoprotein A-I levels increased by 23% (P <0.001), and the ratio of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol to HDL cholesterol level decreased by 13% (P = 0.10). There were significant between-group differences (responders-nonresponders) in the mean 12-month changes in HDL cholesterol levels (8.0 mg/dL; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3 to 13 mg/dL; P = 0.002), apolipoprotein A-I levels (21 mg/dL; 95% CI: 8 to 33 mg/dL; P = 0.003), and the LDL cholesterol to HDL cholesterol ratio (-0.6; 95% CI: -0.1 to -1.0; P = 0.03), but not in LDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein B-100, or lipoprotein(a) levels. CONCLUSION: Active rheumatoid arthritis is associated with an adverse lipid profile that improves substantially following effective treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. This improvement may reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease.     

Benidipine, a long-acting calcium channel blocker, inhibits oxidative stress in polymorphonuclear cells in patients with essential hypertension.

To study the relationship between blood pressure and oxidative stress in leukocytes, the effect of benidipine on these variables was compared with that of a placebo. Hypertensive patients were randomly assigned benidipine 4 mg (n=40) or placebo (n=40), and treated for 6 months. Oxidative stress in polymorphonuclear cells (PMNs) was measured by gated flow cytometry. There was a significant relationship between systolic or diastolic arterial pressure and reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation by PMNs in the benidipine group (r=0.61, p<0.01) and in the placebo group (r=0.58, p<0.01). After administration of 4 mg benidipine, ROS formation by PMNs fell by 32 arbitrary units (n=40, p<0.01). After administration of placebo, ROS formation by PMNs decreased by 0.6 arbitrary units (n=40, p=0.31) (p<0.01 for differing treatment effects). There was a significant relationship between the decrease in systolic arterial pressure and the decrease in ROS formation by PMNs in the benidipine group (r=0.52, p<0.01), but not in the placebo group (r=-0.08, p=0.61). There was also a significant relationship between the decrease in diastolic arterial pressure and decrease in ROS formation by PMNs in the benidipine group (r=0.65, p<0.01) but not in the placebo group (r=-0.09, p=0.59). In hypertensive patients, we observed a significant relationship between systolic or diastolic blood pressure and ROS formation by PMNs, and found that benidipine decreased oxidative stress in PMNs of hypertensive patients, at least in part by decreasing blood pressure.     

Haemodynamic effects of carvedilol, a new beta-adrenoceptor blocker and precapillary vasodilator in essential hypertension

Carvedilol (BM 14190) is a new antihypertensive compound which combines beta-adrenoceptor blocking and precapillary vasodilating properties but is devoid of intrinsic sympathomimetic activity. The acute and long-term effects on blood pressure and regional haemodynamics (forearm plethysmography) were studied with carvedilol 25 mg b.i.d. or 50 mg b.i.d. Comparisons were made with propranolol 80 mg b.i.d. in a randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial comprised of 30 patients with essential hypertension. After a four-week placebo period active therapy was given for four weeks. Carvedilol administered acutely reduced blood pressure at both doses, delta 13/6 mmHg (P less than 0.001/P less than 0.01) and 17/10 mmHg (P less than 0.001/P less than 0.01). Resistance in the forearm fell significantly with the higher dose. This was in contrast to propranolol which only reduced heart rate acutely, and as expected caused a rise in forearm resistance. After four weeks both compounds had reduced blood pressure significantly and to the same extent. Blood flow was still significantly reduced with propranolol in contrast to the findings with carvedilol. We conclude that carvedilol given orally has a useful antihypertensive effect both acutely and during prolonged treatment. It is well tolerated and its haemodynamic profile is attractive.     

Comparison of carvedilol and metoprolol on serum lipid concentration in diabetic hypertensive patients

Context: Vasoconstricting beta‐blocker use is associated with a reduction in HDL cholesterol, higher triglyceride, total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol levels, whereas carvedilol, a vasodilating beta‐blocker, has not been associated with these effects. Objective: To compare in a randomized, double‐blind study, the effects of the beta 1‐blocker metoprolol tartrate with the combined alpha 1, beta‐blocker carvedilol on serum lipid concentrations. Methods: A prospective randomized, double‐blind, parallel‐group trial compared the effects of carvedilol and metoprolol on total cholesterol, triglycerides, calculated LDL, HDL and non‐HDL cholesterol levels at baseline and after 5 months of therapy as a secondary objective in the Glycemic Effects in Diabetes Mellitus: Carvedilol‐Metoprolol Comparison in Hypertensive (GEMINI) study. In this study, 1235 participants with type 2 diabetes and hypertension who were receiving renin‐angiotensin system blockers were randomized either to carvedilol, receiving 6.25–25 mg twice daily, or to metoprolol tartrate, receiving 50–200 mg twice daily. If needed, hydrochlorothiazide and a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker were added to achieve blood pressure goals. Results: In the metoprolol tartrate group, triglycerides and non‐HDL cholesterol increased and both the LDL and the HDL cholesterol levels decreased. In the carvedilol group, total LDL and HDL cholesterol decreased, non‐HDL cholesterol was unchanged and triglycerides increased. Comparing the carvedilol and metoprolol tartrate groups, there was no statistically significant difference in LDL and HDL cholesterol levels, but there was a significantly greater decreases with carvedilol in total cholesterol [?2.9%, 95% confidence interval (CI) ?4.60 to ?1.15, p < 0.001], triglycerides (?9.8%, 95% CI ?13.7, ?5.75%, p < 0.001) and non‐HDL cholesterol (?4.03%, 95% CI ?6.3 to ?1.8, p < 0.0006). At the end of the study, significantly more participants in the metoprolol tartrate group had had initiation of statin therapy or the statin dose increased than those in the carvedilol group (11 vs. 32%, p = 0.04). Conclusions: In patients with type 2 diabetes currently receiving a renin‐angiotensin blocker, compared with metoprolol tartrate, the addition of carvedilol for blood pressure control resulted in a significant decrease in triglyceride, total cholesterol and non‐HDL cholesterol levels. The use of metoprolol resulted in a significantly greater rate of initiation of statin therapy or an increase in the dose of existing statin therapy when compared with carvedilol utilization.     

The acute hemodynamic effects of the new vasodilating beta blocker carvedilol in comparison with combined administration of nifedipine and propranolol in patients with coronary heart disease

The acute hemodynamic effects of carvedilol, a new vasodilating betablocker, were assessed in comparison to the response to nifedipine or a combination of nifedipine and propranolol in patients with coronary artery disease. Either 5 mg carvedilol, 2 mg nifedipine or 2 mg nifedipine + 5 mg propranolol (N + P) were administered intravenously in a not randomized study within 30 min to 10 patients for each drug. Carvedilol reduced (comparable to the effect of N + P) the left ventricular afterload with a decrease of AOPm of 12.6%, p less than 0.001 (N + P -11.8%, p less than 0.001) and systemic vascular resistance of 9.1%, p less than 0.02 (N + P -10.0%, p less than 0.01) and no change of cardiac index. Single treatment with nifedipine leads to a reflex increase of heart rate which could not be observed after carvedilol or N + P as a result of the betablocking properties of carvedilol and propranolol. Therefore, the rate-pressure-product at rest was unchanged after nifedipine but decreased significantly after carvedilol (-10.9%, p less than 0.01) and N + P (-12.4%, p less than 0.01). Negative inotropic effects were significantly lower after carvedilol, with a 6.3% (p less than 0.05) decrease of LV dP/dtmax, compared to N + P (-12.0%, p less than 0.01). Since preload, afterload, and heart rate changes were equal in both groups negative inotropic effects can be compared on the base of dP/dtmax changes. The acute hemodynamic effects (vasodilation without reflex tachycardia, negative inotropic effects) of the new vasodilating betablocker carvedilol are comparable to a combined treatment with nifedipine and propranolol in patients with coronary artery disease and well preserved left ventricular global function.     

Effect of Beta-blockade and ACE Inhibition on B-type Natriuretic Peptides in Stable Patients with Systolic Heart Failure

INTRODUCTION: The long-term effect of beta-blockade on the plasma levels of natriuretic peptides BNP and its N-terminal counterpart, NT-proBNP, as risk markers in heart failure (HF) is obscure. METHODS: Stable systolic HF patients from the CARMEN study were divided in groups matching their randomised treatment allocation: Carvedilol, enalapril or carvedilol+enalapril. Changes in BNP and NT-proBNP from baseline to 6 months maintenance visit were evaluated in each treatment arm. Furthermore, the prognostic value of BNP and NT-proBNP during monotherapy with carvedilol was assessed with univariate Cox proportional hazards models using a combined endpoint of all cause mortality and cardiovascular hospitalisation. RESULTS: NT-proBNP and BNP were significantly reduced after six months treatment with enalapril (NT-proBNP 1,303 to 857 pg/ml (P < 0.001), BNP 119 to 85 pg/ml (P < 0.001)) or carvedilol+enalapril (NT-proBNP 1,223 to 953 pg/ml (P = 0.003), BNP 117 to 93 pg/ml (P = 0.01)). In contrast, no change was observed in the carvedilol group (NT-proBNP 907 to 1,082 pg/ml (P = 0.06), BNP 114 to 130 pg/ml (P = 0.15). The prognostic value of NT-proBNP and BNP was maintained in the carvedilol group (NT-proBNP HR 1.018 95% CI (1.005-1.032), BNP 1.171 (1.088-1.260)). CONCLUSION: Treatment of HF patients with carvedilol alone does not reduce levels of natriuretic peptides, but treatment with enalapril does. Both BNP and NT-proBNP predict death and hospitalisation in HF patients treated with carvedilol for six months. The clinical implication of our results is that NT-proBNP and BNP can be used as risk markers of death and cardiovascular hospitalisations in systolic HF patients receiving carvedilol without ACE inhibition.     

Association of antioxidant enzyme gene polymorphisms and glutathione status with severe acute pancreatitis

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Genetic variations in antioxidant metabolism may explain varying biological responses to acute pancreatitis (AP). We studied the contribution of oxidative stress to the pathogenesis of severe pancreatitis by examining the prevalence of functional gene polymorphisms of antioxidant enzymes and evidence of heightened oxidative stress. METHODS: DNA from 320 patients with AP (90 severe) and 263 controls was genotyped for glutathione S-transferase (Mu-1 [M-1], theta-1 [T-1], and pi-1 [P-1: Ile-105Val]), manganese superoxide dismutase (Ala-9Val), and catalase (C-260T) polymorphisms. Erythrocyte reduced glutathione (GSH) concentration was determined 24 and 72 hours after the onset of pain in 46 patients (11 severe). Disease severity was assessed using Atlanta clinical criteria, Acute Physiology Scores (APS), and peak serum C-reactive protein levels. RESULTS: The functional GSTT-1*A genotype was more prevalent in severe (96%) compared with mild attacks of AP (78%; odds ratio [OR], 5.9; 95% confidence interval [CI ], 2-17; P < 0.0001) and controls (76%; OR, 6.6; 95% CI, 2.3-18.7; P < 0.0001). Compared with null genotype, GSTT-1*A was associated with higher peak C-reactive protein levels (184 vs. 94 g/dL; P = 0.0005) and APS (24 hours, P = 0.04; 48 hours, P = 0.015). Reduced glutathione (GSH) at 24 hours was lower in mild (median, 382 nmol/g) and severe attacks (median, 407 nmol/g) compared with controls (median, 3685 nmol/g; P < 0.001). Levels increased at 72 hours in mild (P = 0.012) but not severe attacks and inversely correlated with APS (r = -0.49; P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The functional GSTT-1*A genotype was associated with severe attacks of pancreatitis. Heightened oxidative stress characterized by glutathione depletion may be of importance in mediating the progression from mild to severe pancreatitis.     

Pioglitazone hydrochloride in combination with sulfonylurea therapy improves glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, placebo-controlled study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of pioglitazone in combination with a sulfonylurea in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This 16-week, double-blind study included patients on a stable regimen of a sulfonylurea for > or = 30 days and with a glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1C) level > or = 8.0%. Patients were randomly assigned to receive once daily pioglitazone 15 mg (n = 184), pioglitazone 30 mg (n = 189), or placebo plus sulfonylurea (n = 187). RESULTS: Patients receiving pioglitazone + sulfonylurea had significant (P < 0.05) decreases from baseline in HbA1C and fasting plasma glucose levels compared with patients treated with placebo + sulfonylurea. As compared with placebo, HbA1C decreased by 0.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.06% to 1.2%) with pioglitazone 15 mg and 1.3% (CI: 1% to 1.6%) with 30 mg pioglitazone; fasting plasma glucose levels decreased by 39 mg/dL (95% CI: 27 to 52 mg/dL) with pioglitazone 15 mg and by 58 mg/dL (95% CI: 46-70 mg/dL) with 30 mg pioglitazone. Both pioglitazone + sulfonylurea groups had significant (P < 0.05) mean percent decreases in triglyceride levels (17%, 95% CI: 6% to 27% for 15 mg; 26%, 95% CI: 16% to 36% for 30 mg) and increases in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (6%, 95% CI: 1% to 11% for 15 mg; 13%, CI: 8% to 18% for 30 mg) compared with placebo + sulfonylurea. There were small but statistically significant mean percent increases in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in all groups. Pioglitazone was well tolerated, and the rates of adverse events were similar in all groups. CONCLUSION: In patients with type 2 diabetes, pioglitazone plus sulfonylurea significantly improves HbA1C and fasting plasma glucose levels with beneficial effects on serum triglyceride and HDL-cholesterol levels.     

Carvedilol prevents doxorubicin-induced free radical release and apoptosis in cardiomyocytes in vitro

The clinical use of doxorubicin, a highly active anticancer drug, is limited by its severe cardiotoxic side effects. Increased oxidative stress and apoptosis have been implicated in the cardiotoxicity of doxorubicin. Carvedilol is an adrenergic blocking agent with potent anti-oxidant activity. In this study we investigated whether carvedilol has protective effects against doxorubicin-induced free radical production and apoptosis in cultured cardiac muscle cells, and we compared the effects of carvedilol to atenolol, a beta-blocker with no anti-oxidant activity. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation in cultured cardiac muscle cells (H9c2 cells) was evaluated by flow cytometry using dichlorofluorescein (DCF) and hydroethidine (HE). Apoptosis was assessed by measuring annexin V-FITC/propidium iodide double staining, DNA laddering, levels of expression of the pro-apoptotic protein Bax-alpha and the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2, and caspase-3 activity. Pre-treatment with carvedilol significantly attenuated the doxorubicin-induced increases in DCF (P < 0.001 compared to cells not pre-treated with carvedilol) and HE (P < 0.01) fluorescence. Doxorubicin increased the fraction of annexin V-FITC-positive fluorescent cells, while pre-treatment with carvedilol reduced the number of positive fluorescent cells (P < 0.01). Doxorubicin-induced DNA fragmentation to a clear ladder pattern, while carvedilol prevented DNA fragmentation. Doxorubicin-induced a fall in mRNA expression of the anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 and an increase in the expression of the pro-apoptotic Bax-alpha. Carvedilol pre-treatment blunted both the decrease of Bcl-2 (P < 0.01) and the increase of Bax-alpha mRNA expression (P < 0.01). Caspase-3 activity significantly increased after the addition of doxorubicin. Concurrently, carvedilol partially inhibited the doxorubicin-induced activation of caspase-3 (P < 0.01). Atenolol did not produce any effect in preventing doxorubicin-induced ROS generation and cardiac apoptosis. Our results suggest that carvedilol is potentially protective against doxorubicin cardiotoxicity by decreasing free radical release and apoptosis in cardiomyocytes.     

Lipoprotein (a) and coronary heart disease among women: beyond a cholesterol carrier?

AIMS: With its homology with plasminogen, lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] may be related to thrombosis and inflammation. We assessed the role of Lp(a) in coronary heart diseases (CHD) by a recently developed assay that is not affected by the plasminogen-like Kringle-type-2 repeats. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 32 826 women from the Nurses' Health Study, who provided blood at baseline, we documented 228 CHD events during 8 years of follow-up. Each case was compared with two matched controls. In a multivariable model adjusted for body mass index, family history, hypertension, diabetes, post-menopausal hormone use, physical activity, blood drawing characteristics, and alcohol intake, the odd ratio (OR) for Lp(a) levels > or =30 mg/dL was 1.9(95% CI: 1.3-3.0) when compared with those with Lp(a)<30 mg/dL. Women with high levels of both Lp(a) (> or =30 mg/dL) and fibrinogen (> or =400 mg/dL) had an OR of 3.2(95% CI: 1.6-6.5) for CHD, when compared with the combination of low levels (P interaction=0.05). Women with high levels of both Lp(a) and C-reactive protein (> or =3 mg/L) had an OR of 3.67(95% CI: 2.03-6.64) for CHD, when compared with the combination of low levels (P interaction=0.06). CONCLUSION: Lp(a) levels >30 mg/dL are associated with twice the risk of CHD events among women and may be related to thrombosis and inflammation.