Nerve transfer in brachial plexus traction injuries.

Brachial plexus palsy due to traction injury, especially spinal nerve-root avulsion, represents a severe handicap for the patient. Despite recent progress in diagnosis and microsurgical repair, the prognosis in such cases remains unfavorable. Nerve transfer is the only possibility for repair in cases of spinal nerve-root avulsion. This technique was analyzed in 37 patients with 64 reinnervation procedures of the musculocutaneous and/or axillary nerve using upper intercostal, spinal accessory, and regional nerves as donors. The most favorable results, with an 83.8% overall rate of useful functional recovery, were obtained in patients with upper brachial plexus palsy in which regional donor nerves, such as the medial pectoral, thoracodorsal, long thoracic, and subscapular nerves, had been used. The overall rates of recovery for the spinal accessory and upper intercostal nerves were 64.3% and 55.5%, respectively, which are significantly lower. The authors evaluate the results of nerve transfer and analyze different donor nerves as factors influencing the prognosis of surgical repair.     

Neurotization of elements of the brachial plexus.

Satisfactory therapy for an avulsion injury of the brachial plexus has yet to be described. Dorsal root entry zone lesions will usually mitigate the searing pain which is so disabling in some of these patients. Neurotization procedures are effective in restoring limited function to these patients. The most useful isolated movement of the upper extremity is elbow flexion, which is thus the primary target of neurotization procedures. Intercostal nerves and elements of the cervical plexus are the most commonly used donor nerves for neurotization procedures. From our experience and from a review of the literature, it appears that these procedures will be successful in approximately 50% of cases. It must be stressed that before performing a nerve transfer, the surgeon must be certain that the patient is not a candidate for a simple nerve graft.     

Nerve repairs for traumatic brachial plexus palsy with root avulsion

Thirty-six patients with traumatic brachial plexus lesions and root avulsions were treated surgically between 1972 and 1986 and were followed for more than 24 months (average, 42.6 months). Neurotization of the musculocutaneous nerve with intercostal nerves or the spinal accessory nerve resulted in satisfactory elbow flexion in 21 of the 33 cases (64%). Combined nerve repairs (i.e., intercostal and spinal accessory neurotization of the terminal branch of the brachial plexus in combination with nerve grafts from the upper spinal nerves of the brachial plexus) created a useful function in at least one functional level of the upper limb for 11 of the 15 cases so treated. Nerve repairs resulted in stability of the shoulder and elbow function controllable with a sensible hand for patients with root avulsion injury of the brachial plexus.     

Concepts of nerve regeneration and repair applied to brachial plexus reconstruction

Brachial plexus injury is a serious condition that usually affects young adults. Progress in brachial plexus repair is intimately related to peripheral nerve surgery, and depends on clinical and experimental studies. We review the rat brachial plexus as an experimental model, together with its behavioral evaluation. Techniques to repair nerves, such as neurolysis, nerve coaptation, nerve grafting, nerve transfer, fascicular transfer, direct muscle neurotization, and end-to-side neurorraphy, are discussed in light of the authors' experimental studies. Intradural repair of the brachial plexus by graft implants into the spinal cord and motor rootlet transfer offer new possibilities in brachial plexus reconstruction. The clinical experience of intradural repair is presented. Surgical planning in root rupture or avulsion is proposed. In total avulsion, the authors are in favor of the reconstruction of thoraco-brachial and abdomino-antebrachial grasping, and on the transfer of the brachialis muscle to the wrist extensors if it is reinnervated. Surgical treatment of painful conditions and new drugs are also discussed.     

Use of intercostal nerves for neurotization of the musculocutaneous nerve in infants with birth-related brachial plexus palsy

OBJECT: The use of intercostal nerves (ICNs) for the neurotization of the musculocutaneous nerve (MCN) in adult patients with traumatic brachial plexus palsy has been well described. However, its use for brachial plexus palsy in infants has rarely been reported. The authors surgically created 31 ICN-MCN communications for birth-related brachial plexus palsy and present the surgical results. METHODS: Thirty-one neurotizations of the MCN, performed using ICNs, were conducted in 30 patients with birth-related brachial plexus palsy. In most cases other procedures were combined to reconstruct all upper-extremity function. The mean patient age at surgery was 5.8 months and the mean follow-up period was 5.2 years. Intercostal nerves were transected 1 cm distal to the mammary line and their stumps were transferred to the axilla, where they were coapted directly to the MCN. Two ICNs were used in 26 cases and three ICNs in five cases. The power of the biceps muscle of the arm was rated Grade M4 in 26 (84%) of 31 patients. In the 12 patients who underwent surgery when they were younger than 5 months of age, all exhibited a grade of M4 (100%) in their biceps muscle power. These results are better than those previously reported in adults. CONCLUSIONS: Neurotization of the MCN by surgically connecting ICNs is a safe, reliable, and effective procedure for reconstruction of the brachial plexus in patients suffering from birth-related palsy.     

Use of intercostal nerves for different target neurotization in brachial plexus reconstruction

Intercostal nerve transfer is a valuable procedure in devastating plexopathies. Intercostal nerves are a very good choice for elbow flexion or extension and shoulder abduction when the intraplexus donor nerves are not available. The best results are obtained in obstetric brachial plexus palsy patients, when direct nerve transfer is performed within six months from the injury. Unlike the adult posttraumatic patients after median and ulnar nerve neurotization with intercostal nerves, almost all obstetric brachial plexus palsy patients achieve protective sensation in the hand and some of them achieve active wrist and finger flexion. Use in combination with proper muscles, intercostal nerve transfer can yield adequate power to the paretic upper limb. Reinnervation of native muscles (i.e., latissimus dorsi) should always be sought as they can successfully be transferred later on for further functional restoration.     

Neurotization via the spinal accessory nerve in complete paralysis due to multiple avulsion injuries of the brachial plexus

The authors report their experience with 21 cases of neurotization via the spinal accessory nerve for multiple nerve root avulsion injuries of the brachial plexus associated with total paralysis of the upper limb. They performed microneuroanastomoses with interposed cable nerve grafts between the spinal accessory nerve taken in the supraclavicular fossa and the musculocutaneous nerve at its entrance into the biceps muscle. Surgical indications depend on the accurate diagnosis of spinal nerve root avulsion, especially C5. The anatomicosurgical basis of this technique is as precise as are the indications. As many as two-thirds of the patients with a neurotized musculocutaneous nerve can be expected to achieve strength of at least Grade 3 on late muscle testing. Nevertheless, these results are always inferior to those obtainable when grafting is performed with carefully selected unavulsed C5 or C6 spinal nerve root fibers in the intervertebral foramina. Therefore, neurotization via donor nerves extrinsic to the plexus should only be considered as a second-choice intervention.     

Contralateral Spinal Accessory Nerve Transfer: A New Technique in Panavulsive Brachial Plexus Palsy

Brachial plexus avulsion results from excessive stretching and can occur secondary to motor vehicle accidents, mainly in motorcyclists. In a 28-year-old man with panavulsive brachial plexus palsy, we describe an alternative technique to repair brachial plexus avulsion and to stabilize and preserve shoulder function by transferring the contralateral spinal accessory nerve to the suprascapular nerve. We observed positive clinical and electromyographic results in sternocleidomastoid, trapezius, supraspinatus, infraspinatus, pectoralis, triceps, and biceps, with good outcome and prognosis for shoulder function at 12 months after surgery. This technique provides a unique opportunity for patients suffering from severe brachial plexus injuries and lacking enough donor nerves to obtain shoulder stability and mobility while avoiding bone fusion and preserving functionality of the contralateral shoulder with favorable postoperative outcomes.     

Coaptation of the anterior rami of C-3 and C-4 to the upper trunk of the brachial plexus for cervical nerve root avulsion

No surgical procedure has been available to repair cervical nerve root avulsion inside the spinal canal. Results with peripheral neurotization of denervated muscles have been discouraging. The authors have performed bridge-graft coaptation in three patients with C-5 and C-6 nerve root avulsion. The components of the coaptation included the anterior primary rami of C-3 and C-4 as the donor material, the entire upper trunk as the recipient, and the sural nerve graft as the bridge. This procedure resulted in restoration of motor function in the biceps and shoulder-girdle muscles and produced improved sensation. Stimulation of the C-3 and C-4 nerve roots elicited electrical responses in the biceps and deltoid muscles that indicated nerve growth through the graft and the brachial plexus into these muscles. This reconstructive procedure is effective and should stimulate development of new approaches to treatment of cervical nerve root avulsion and proximal brachial plexopathy.     

C3,4 transfer for neurotization of C5,6 nerve roots in brachial plexus injury in a rabbit model

To evaluate the root neurotization properties of extraplexal donor nerves, an avulsion injury model of brachial plexus was created and repaired by C 3,4 nerve-root transfers in the rabbit. Eighteen rabbits were divided into three groups. In Group 1 (n = 6), the right C 5,6 nerve roots were avulsed and bridged by a nerve graft taken from the femoral nerve, with C 3,4 as C 3 to C 5 and C 4 to C 6. In Group 2 (n = 6), the right C 5,6 nerve roots were cut and directly sutured end-to-end. Group 3 (n = 6) was a negative group, in which C 5,6 nerve roots were avulsed without repair. All three groups were positively controlled by the contralateral side. Postoperative behavior observation and anatomic, electrophysiologic studies were conducted 4 months later for comparison among groups. Axon existence was observed by acetylcholinesterase staining. Results showed that active motion was not found in all three groups by the end of the study. Extraplexal nerve transfer indeed was able to re-neurotize the avulsed nerve roots down to their target organ, but C 3,4 nerve transfer was weaker than direct end-to-end suture, in terms of neurotization ability. The authors conclude that "root or trunk repair" for avulsion injury of the brachial plexus is possible, provided that the donor nerve has enough fibers and the nerve regeneration ability is increased by modern moleculobiologic techniques.     

Restoration of Elbow Flexion by Transfer of the Phrenic Nerve to Musculocutaneous Nerve after Brachial Plexus Injuries

Traumatic brachial plexus injuries are a devastating injury that results in partial or total denervation of the muscles of the upper extremity. Treatment options that include neurolysis, nerve grafting, or neurotization (nerve transfer) has become an important procedure in the restoration of function in patients with irreparable preganglionic lesions. Restoration of elbow flexion is the primary goal in treating patients with severe brachial plexus injuries. Nerve transfers are used when spinal roots are avulsed, and proximal stumps are not available. In the present study, we analyze the results obtained in 20 patients treated with phrenic–musculocutaneous nerve transfer to restore elbow flexion after brachial plexus injuries. A consecutive series of 25 adult patients (21 men and 4 women) with a brachial plexus traction/crush lesion were treated with phrenic–musculocutaneous nerve transfer, but only 20 patients (18 men and 2 women) were followed and evaluated for at least 2 years postoperatively. All patients had been referred from other institutions. At the initial evaluation, eight patients received a diagnosis of C5-6 brachial plexus nerve injury, and in the other 12 patients, a complete brachial plexus injury was identified. Reconstruction was undertaken if no clinical or electrical evidence of biceps muscle function was seen by 3 months post injury. Functional elbow flexion was obtained in the majority of cases by phrenic–musculocutaneous nerve transfer (14/20, 70%). At the final follow-up evaluation, elbow flexion strength was a Medical Research Council Grade 5 in two patients, Grade 4 in four patients, Grade 3 in eight patients, and Grade 2 or less in six patients. Transfer involving the phrenic nerve to restore elbow flexion seems to be an appropriate approach for the treatment of brachial plexus root avulsion. Traumatic brachial plexus injury is a devastating injury that result in partial or total denervation of the muscles of the upper extremity. Treatment options include neurolysis, nerve grafting, or neurotization (nerve transfer). Neurotization is the transfer of a functional but less important nerve to a denervated more important nerve. It has become an important procedure in the restoration of function in patients with irreparable preganglionic lesions. Restoration of elbow flexion is the primary goal in treating patients with severe brachial plexus injuries. Nerve transfers are used when spinal roots are avulsed, and proximal stumps are not available. Newer extraplexal sources include the ipsilateral phrenic nerve as reported by Gu et al. (Chin Med J 103:267–270, 1990) and contralateral C7 as reported by Gu et al. (J Hand Surg [Br] 17(B):518–521, 1992) and Songcharoen et al. (J Hand Surg [Am] 26(A):1058–1064, 2001). These nerve transfers have been introduced to expand on the limited donors. The phrenic nerve and its anatomic position directly within the surgical field makes it a tempting source for nerve transfer. Although not always, in cases of complete brachial plexus avulsion, the phrenic nerve is functioning as a result of its C3 and C4 major contributions. In the present study, we analyze the results obtained in 20 patients treated with phrenic–musculocutaneous nerve transfer to restore elbow flexion after brachial plexus injuries.     

Contralateral C7 transfer in adult plexopathies

In the current study, a retrospective review of 56 patients with posttraumatic root avulsion brachial plexus injuries who underwent contralateral C7 transfer using the selective contralateral C7 technique is presented. The intraoperative findings of the involved brachial plexus, the surgical technique of preparation of the donor C7 nerve root, and the various neurotization procedures are reported. The surgical outcomes as well as the potential adverse effects of the procedure are analyzed. We conclude from this study that the selective contralateral C7 technique is a safe procedure that can be applied successfully for simultaneous reconstruction of several different contralateral muscle targets or for neurotization of cross chest nerve grafts for future free muscle transplantation.     

Neurophysiologic and clinical outcome following medial pectoral to long thoracic nerve transfer for scapular winging: a case report

The use of nerve transfers (neurotization) in the reconstruction of nerve palsy is not new, but its clinical efficacy is still largely based on reports of successful restoration of elbow flexion and shoulder abduction following brachial plexus avulsion. Although its potential application extends beyond the brachial plexus, little has been written about additional indications or associated postoperative outcomes. The case described in this report illustrates yet another indication for which neurotization may be a useful technique. Medial pectoral nerve transfer to the long thoracic nerve was performed via an 11-cm sural nerve graft to treat scapular winging 4 months following nerve injury caused during axillary node dissection. Neurophysiologic and clinical outcome 18 months postoperatively revealed successful reinnervation of the serratus anterior muscle, decreased scapular winging, and symptomatic improvement from the patient's perspective.     

Neurotization in brachial plexus injuries. Indication and results

In neurotization or nerve transfer, a healthy but less valuable nerve or its proximal stump is transferred in order to reinnervate a more important sensory or motor territory that has lost its innervation through irreparable damage to its nerve. In brachial plexus injuries, extraplexal nerves such as the spinal accessory nerve, rami of the cervical plexus, or intercostal nerves are transferred onto trunks, cords, or individual nerves or else segments of the brachial plexus that maintain continuity with the spinal cord may be coapted to trunks or cords the surgeon wishes to innervate. This method is particularly indicated in root avulsion injuries that occur frequently following traction trauma to the brachial plexus. The authors convey their experience with neurotization using the long thoracic nerve in seven cases, the accessory nerve in 30 cases, intercostal nerves in 66 cases, and various nerve transfers within the plexus in 31 cases. Results of other authors are also reported. With these methods, it is possible to obtain good elbow flexion in more than one-half of patients; however, only limited shoulder function and no useful finger function are obtained.     

Phrenic nerve neurotization of the musculocutaneous nerve with end-to-side neurorrhaphy: a short report in a rabbit model

This experimental study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of end-to-side coaptation between the musculocutaneous nerve and the phrenic nerve for brachial plexus injuries with nerve-root avulsions. In an experimental rabbit model, neurotization of the musculocutaneous nerve with the phrenic nerve was compared using end-to-end and end-to-side neurorrhaphy. Preliminary results from electrophysiologic and histologic examinations indicate that end-to-side neurotization of the musculocutaneous nerve with the phrenic nerve is an effective means for musculocutaneous nerve repair. The effectiveness of the phrenic nerve is attributed to its large number of motor axons.     

Double muscle transfer for upper extremity reconstruction following complete avulsion of the brachial plexus

Recent interest in reconstruction of the upper limb following brachial plexus injuries has focused on the restoration of prehension following complete avulsion of the brachial plexus. The authors use free muscle transfers for reconstruction of the upper limb to resolve the difficult problems in complete avulsion of the brachial plexus. This article describes the authors' updated technique--the double free muscle procedure. Reconstruction of prehension to achieve independent voluntary finger and elbow flexion and extension by the use of double free muscle and multiple nerve transfers following complete avulsion of the brachial plexus (nerve roots C5 to T1) is presented. The procedure involves transferring the first free muscle, neurotized by the spinal accessory nerve for elbow flexion and finger extension, a second free muscle transfer reinnervated by the fifth and sixth intercostal nerves for finger flexion, and neurotization of the triceps brachii via its motor nerve by the third and fourth intercostal motor nerves to extend and stabilize the elbow. Restoration of hand sensibility is obtained via the suturing of sensory rami from the intercostal nerves to the median nerve. Secondary reconstruction, including arthrodesis of the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb and glenohumeral joint, and tenolysis of the transferred muscle and distal tendons, improve the functional outcome. Based on the long-term result, selection of the patient, donor muscle, and donor motor nerve were indicated. Most patients were able to achieve prehensile functions such as holding a can and lifting a heavy box. This double free muscle transfer has provided prehension for patients with complete avulsion of the brachial plexus and has given them new hope to be able to use their otherwise useless limbs.     

在胸腔内窥镜镜视下切取膈神经的实验研究

目的研究在胸腔内窥镜镜视下切取尸体膈神经的行径,提供足够长度的膈神经作为动力神经。方法新鲜尸体１５具,１５侧作膈神经在胸腔内走行与毗邻关系的解剖研究;１５侧作实验用。胸腔镜从第５、６肋间锁骨中线外侧插入胸腔,于膈肌上２ｃｍ处切断膈神经后,从锁骨上臂丛切口内拉出膈神经。结果膈肌上２ｃｍ处可见膈神经４～５支分支,距膈肌２ｃｍ以上处切断膈神经,可顺利抽出长度为１９～２５ｃｍ的膈神经。在抽出过程中膈神经无１根断裂。结论该术式在尸体实践中操作安全,膈神经长度足以作为修复臂丛神经根性撕脱伤的动力神经。为临床应用提供了一个切取膈神经的新术式。     

同侧颈7神经根移位治疗臂丛上千根性撕脱伤的实验研究

目的 实验性比较同侧C7神经根全根移位与其他3种方法治疗臂丛上千根性撕脱伤的疗效.方法 120只SD大鼠建立上千根性撕脱伤模型后随机等分为4组,每组30只.(1)A组:同侧C7移位至上千+副神经至肩胛上神经;(2)B组:Oberlin手术(尺神经一束移位至肱二头肌支)+副神经至肩胛上神经+桡神经肱三头肌长头支至腋神经前支;(3)C组:膈神经移位至上千前股+副神经至肩胛上神经+颈丛运动支至上千后股;(4)D组:膈神经移位至上千前股+副神经至肩胛上神经,不作腋神经修复.术后3、6和12周每组取10只大鼠作Ochiai评分、Barth足错步试验、Terzis梳头试验及神经再生指标的榆测.结果 术后3周,A组3项行为学检测指标与3个对照组差异无统计学意义(P>0.017),腋神经电生理指标均显著优于3个对照组,其余各项腋神经及三角肌组织学指标均显著优于C组和D组,但与B组比较差异无统计学意义.A组除肌皮神经再生有髓神经纤维通过率显著优于C组外,其余肌皮神经及肱二头肌的电牛理与组织学检测指标与3个对照组比较差异无统计学意义.12周时,A组各项行为学观察、几乎全部腋神经和三角肌的电生理与组织学检测以及部分肌皮神经和肱二头肌的电生理与组织学检测指标均已显著优于3个对照组.结论 同侧C7神经根移位对治疗臂丛上千根性撕脱伤的实验性疗效显著.     

椎管内外神经根移位整体化治疗臂丛神经根性撕脱伤的实验研究

目的：研究臂丛神经根性撕脱伤后,椎管内、外神经根移位治疗臂丛神经根性撕脱伤的疗效。方法随机选取SD大鼠60只,随机分为实验组及对照组。实验组采用椎管内C5,C6神经根原位修复及健侧C7神经移位修复C8,T1神经根治疗臂丛根性撕脱伤;对照组为膈神经修复肌皮神经,副神经修复肩胛上神经,健侧C7移位修复C8,T1神经根治疗臂丛根性撕脱伤。术后6个月时取材,进行电生理检测,肌肉湿重的测量,肌肉纤维横截面积的检测,HE染色检测观察肌纤维数量,电镜观察神经纤维数量及神经直径。结果实验组神经损伤修复6个月时,其肌肉湿重、肌肉纤维横截面积、肌肉运动诱发电位恢复率、神经生长情况优于对照组。结论椎管内神经根原位修复及椎管外神经根移位整体化治疗臂丛神经根性撕脱伤,无论从肌肉湿重、还是肌肉纤维横截面积比率,或者肌肉运动诱发电位及再生神经生长情况等方面,都取得了良好的效果。     

Clinical analysis of 16 patients with brachial plexus injury

Brachial plexus injury is very rare in neurosurgical practice, so many neurosurgeons have never experienced this problem in Japan. This study describes a clinical analysis of 16 patients aged 5 to 62 years (mean 32.9 years) who presented at our institution with brachial plexus injuries. Nine patients presented with paralysis and seven with paresis. Head injury was the most common associated injury in eight of 16 patients. Six patients were managed conservatively. All patients with C8-T1 paresis spontaneously recovered to a useful level. Surgery was performed in 10 patients: six neurolysis, two neurotization, and three nerve grafting procedures. All six patients who underwent neurolysis of the brachial plexus attained useful recovery. Four of five patients achieved useful recovery after nerve repair. Nerve grafting achieved a better outcome than neurotization in this study. The difference of outcome was attributed to the graft length. The management of brachial plexus injury is a great challenge, but surgical outcome can be improved if the optimal repair procedure is selected for brachial plexus injury.