Phase II study of cisplatin, gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the activity of the combination of cisplatin, gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) as therapy for metastatic or locally advanced inoperable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically proven advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma received first-line chemotherapy comprising cisplatin (20 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29 and 36), gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 29 and 36) and 5-FU (200 mg/m2 as continuous infusion on days 1-42) every 56 days. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients were studied. Eighty courses were administered (median two courses per patient). Among 32 patients evaluable for response, two patients had a complete response and four a partial response for an overall response rate of 19% (95% confidence interval 7% to 36%). Thirteen patients had stable disease (40%) and 13 progressed. Median progression-free survival was 4.7 months, median survival 9.0 months and 26% of patients achieved 1-year survival. Ten of 25 patients (40%) with pain at presentation had a sustained reduction of analgesic consumption. The principal grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anaemia and mucositis, occurring in 24%, 21%, 9% and 3% of patients. CONCLUSION: This schedule seems well tolerated and active in pancreatic cancer and worthwhile of further evaluation.     

Comparative Study of Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin and Gemcitabine Plus Fluorouracil in the Treatment of Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Objective To compare the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine plus cisplatin and gemcitabine plus fluorouracil in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. Methods Sixty patients with advanced pancreatic cancer were randomly divided into a GP group (gemcitabine + cisplatin, 30 cases) and a GF group (gemcitabine + fluorouracil, 30 cases). All patients were treated with gemcitabine at a dose of 1,000mg/m² (diluted in 100ml saline solution over 30 min) once a week for 3 consecutive weeks. The GP Group was followed by 40mg cisplatin via intravenous drip on days 15,16,17. Group GF was followed by 500mg/m²5-Fu (diluted in 5% glucose-saline (GS) 500ml, intravenously, over 6 hr) every day for five subsequent days. Results In the GP group, eight cases (32.0%) were PR and MR, the median survival time was 8.7 months, the Clinical Beneficial Rate (CBR) was 57.7%, and the CA19-9 decreased by over 50% in 13 cases (48.1%). In the GF group, 11 cases (45.8%) were PR and MR, the survival time was 10.1 months, the CBR was 82.1%, and CA19-9 decreased by over 50% in 15 cases(53.6%). There was a significant difference in the CBR between the two groups (P<0.05). The main toxicities in both groups were leucopenia and thrombocytopenia with no significant difference. Conclusions The treatment given to either the GP or GF group is a feasible and well-tolerated chemotherapy regimen for treating advanced pancreatic cancer with improved therapeutic efficacy and few side effects. The median survival period is long and the CBR is high, especially with the GF regimen.     

Phase II study of gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

The efficacy and safety of gemcitabine at a starting dose of 800 mg m2 administered once a week for 3 weeks with 1 week''s rest was investigated in chemonaive patients with advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Of 34 patients, 32 were evaluable for efficacy, 20 patients had metastatic stage IV disease, 25 had a performance status of 1 and 26 (76%) patients has significant pain on presentation. All responses were independently validated by an external oncology review board: two patients achieved a partial response that lasted 5.8 and 5.2 months (6.3%) and six patients were stable for at least 4 weeks. The median duration of survival for evaluable patients was 6.3 months (range 1.6-19.2 months). The tumour markers, CEA, CA 19-9 and CA 195 were serially measured in 16 patients. There was a good correlation with tumour response when all three markers were significantly decreased. In 4 of 16 patients, tumour marker levels decreased by > or = 60%, including the two responders, one patient who survived for 12 months and one patient who showed objective tumour shrinkage but was deemed ineligible for response evaluation because the disease was considered not to be bidimensionally measurable. Symptomatic benefits included improvement in performance status (17.2%), analgesic requirement (7.4%), pain score (28.6%) and nausea (27.3%). The mean number of cycles administered was 2.5 and the mean dosage received was 890 mg m2 per injection. Seventy-four per cent of dose administrations were given on schedule. Toxicity, particularly haematological toxicity, reported as the maximum WHO grade experienced by patients was mild. Infective episodes were rare and limited to WHO grade 2 (6.7%). Nausea and vomiting was generally modest (WHO grade 3, 26.7%). Other side-effects included mild transient flu-like symptoms (seven patients) and peripheral oedema (three patients), which was not associated with abnormal cardiac hepatic or renal function. Gemcitabine has modest activity in pancreatic cancer, a limited positive improvement on a range of patient benefit parameters and has a mild toxicity profile. For these reasons and because of its novel mode of action, gemcitabine warrants further investigation in combination studies in pancreatic cancer.     

A Phase II study of gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer

BACKGROUND: The authors performed a Phase II study of combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with inoperable biliary tract cancer to evaluate efficacy and toxicity of this combination. In addition, the correlation between the CA 19-9 response and clinical outcome was analyzed. METHODS: The eligibility criteria for this study were 1) histologically or cytologically confirmed inoperable biliary tract cancer in patients with metastatic or recurrent disease; 2) age between 18 and 70 years; 3) at least 1 measurable lesion according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria; 4) an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status < or = 2; 5) a life expectancy of at least 3 mos; and 6) adequate bone marrow, hepatic, and renal function. The patients received gemcitabine (1250 mg/m(2), Days 1 and 8) and cisplatin (60 mg/m(2), Day 1) every 3 weeks. Tumor response was assessed by RECIST criteria every 2 cycles of chemotherapy. Treatment was continued until progression of disease was documented. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were enrolled. The median age of these patients was 52 years (range, 37 to 69 yrs), and the median ECOG performance status was 1. No complete response was observed, and 10 of 29 patients had partial responses. The overall response rate was 34.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.9-54.3) for the intent-to-treat analysis. Stable disease was observed in 4 (13.8%) patients and progressive disease in 13 (44.8%) patients. The median follow-up time was 10.0 months (95% CI, 7.2-12.8). The median time to progression (TTP) was 3.0 months (95% CI, 2.12-3.88), and the median overall survival was 11 months (95% CI, 5.49-16.5). Although these results showed a better response rate (57.1 % vs. 27.3%) and survival (12 vs. 10 mos) in patients with a decline in CA 19-9 of at least 25%, these data were statistically not significant. In addition, there was a significant positive correlation between the increment in CA 19-9 values and tumor progression as determined with RECIST criteria (r = 0.96, P < 0.01). However, there was no definite correlation between the CA 19-9 response and the response according to RECIST criteria (P = 0.087). National Cancer Institute (NCI) common toxicity criteria (CTC) Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities included neutropenia in 4 (14%) patients and anemia in 1 (3%) patient. Two of 4 patients with Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia had febrile episodes (7%) and required hospital admissions. NCI-CTC Grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic toxicity included nausea in 1 (3%) patient. There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: The combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin in inoperable biliary tract cancer was tolerable for most patients and showed modest response rates. The role of CA 19-9 monitoring as a surrogate biomarker in patients with BTC treated with gemcitabine chemotherapy should be further investigated.     

Phase II study of cisplatin preceding gemcitabine in patients with advanced oesophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: For oesophageal cancer there is no effective standard therapy. We studied the feasibility and efficacy of the cisplatin-gemcitabine combination chemotherapy in patients with unresectable oesophageal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-six chemona?ve patients with unresectable or metastatic oesophageal adenocarcinoma (24) or squamous-cell-carcinoma (12) were treated with cisplatin (50 mg/m2, days 1 and 8), followed by gemcitabine (800 mg/m2, days 2, 9 and 16), every 28 days. Feasibility and efficacy were studied. RESULTS: Toxicity was substantial but manageable. A median number of four therapy cycles was given. The most frequent grade > or = 3 toxicities were leukopenia (75%) and neutropenia (83%). Three patients developed neutropenic fever. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 24 out of 36 patients (67%), but did not result in serious bleeding disorders. Myelotoxicity was cumulative and required omission of gemcitabine on day 16 in 63% of cycles. Anaemia required treatment with erythropoietin, red blood cells or both in 81% of patients. Non-haematological toxicity consisted mainly of grade 1/2 nausea/vomiting or fatigue. Fourteen out of 34 evaluable patients had a major objective response (41%; two complete and 12 partial responses). The median actuarial survival was 9.8 months. CONCLUSION: This cisplatin-gemcitabine regimen was feasible, with myelosupression being the main toxicity, and had significant activity in patients with advanced oesophageal cancer.     

Phase II study with gemcitabine, ifosfamide and cisplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

The aim of the present study was to determine the clinical activity and toxicity of a novel chemotherapy combination regimen of gemcitabine, ifosfamide and cisplatin (GIP), administered every 3 weeks, in patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). From October 1998 to July 1999, 18 previously untreated stages IIIb (4) and IV (14) patients were enrolled into the study. Gemcitabine and ifosfamide (with mesna as uroprotection) was administered on days 1 and 6, at a dose of 1000 and 1500 mg/m², respectively; and cisplatin was given on day 1 at a dose of 60 mg/m², every 3 weeks. All 18 patients were evaluable for response and toxicity profiles. One patient achieved a complete response, and 11 patients achieved a partial response, with an overall response rate of 66.7% (95% CI, 45–89%). The main toxicity was hematological, a NCI grade 3–4 neutropenia in 16 patients (88.9%) during the treatment course. Febrile neutropenia occurred in three patients (16.6%). Grade 3 anemia occurred in eight patients (44.4%) and grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 11 patients (61.1%). Non-hematological toxicity was mild and tolerable. No toxic death occurred. The median survival was 12.7 months and 1 year survival was 58.4%. The GIP combination chemotherapy produced a high response rate in advanced NSCLC; however, there was a relatively high percentage of hematological toxicity that still could be tolerated. A randomized trial comparing GIP to a two-drug combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin is planned.     

Phase II study of gemcitabine and cisplatin in locally advanced/metastatic oesophageal cancer

Palliative chemotherapy for inoperable/metastatic oesophageal cancer has limited activity. This study assesses the feasibility and activity of gemcitabine and cisplatin in this group of patients. In total, 42 patients with locally advanced/metastatic squamous or adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus were treated with gemcitabine 1250 mg m(-2) days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 75 mg m(-2) day 1 in a 21-day cycle. Interim safety analysis was carried out after the first 19 patients suggested significant toxicity. The dose of gemcitabine was subsequently reduced to 1000 mg m(-2). Patients were assessed for toxicity and response. The median number of treatment cycles per patient was 4 (range 1-6). Grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 37% of cycles; however, there was only one episode of neutropenic fever. Nonhaematological toxicities included fatigue, nausea and vomiting. Among 32 patients eligible for response, there were three complete responses and 16 partial responses (overall response rate of 45%); nine patients had stable disease. Median survival was 11 months. The response rate appears to be greatest in those with squamous carcinoma compared to adenocarcinoma (71 vs 33%, P=0.036). The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin in this schedule has manageable toxicity and significant activity in patients with locally advanced/metastatic oesophageal cancer and is worthy of further study.     

Phase II study of gemcitabine, UFT and leucovorin in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer

The combination of gemcitabine with protracted 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer has shown activity with tolerable toxicity. The administration of UFT may simulate the effects of a protracted infusion of 5-FU. Patients with previously untreated metastatic or unresectable measurable pancreatic adenocarcinoma received gemcitabine (800 mg/m2 i.v., administered as an 80-min infusion on days 1, 8 and 15), UFT (200 mg/m2/day, on days 1 to 21), and oral leucovorin (90 mg/day, on days 1 to 21). Thirty patients were enrolled in this study. Five patients had partial responses, with an overall response rate of 17% (5/30), using the intent-to-treat principle (95% confidence interval (CI), 3-30%). Nine out of 25 (36%) patients experienced clinical benefit responses (95% CI; 17-55%). The median time to progression was 3.0 months, and the median overall survival was 7.2 months. The principal adverse event was neutropenia. The combination of gemcitabine, UFT, plus oral leucovorin shows significant antitumor activity and a beneficial clinical effect with an acceptable level of toxicity.     

Phase II study of gemcitabine and cisplatin in the treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic carcinoma is considered among the most chemoresistant of human malignancies. The most commonly used cytotoxic single agents, 5-fluorouracil and 2'-deoxy-2',2'-difluorocytidine (gemcitabine), have objective response rates of less than 10% in large studies. Hypothesizing noncross resistance and a synergistic interaction between gemcitabine and cisplatin, early clinical studies have demonstrated significant activity with this combination in patients with several types of malignant disease. A Phase II study was undertaken to determine the efficacy of gemcitabine in combination with cisplatin in patients with locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic carcinoma based on these considerations. METHODS: The eligibility criteria included histologically confirmed, locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic exocrine carcinoma of the pancreas with no prior gemcitabine therapy; prior adjuvant therapy was allowed provided the last day of therapy was at least 6 months prior to starting treatment; clinically measurable or evaluable disease; a Southwest Oncology Group scale performance status of 0-2; a life expectancy of > 12 weeks; and adequate bone marrow, hepatic, and renal function. A total of 42 patients, 4 patients with locally advanced, unresectable disease and 38 patients with metastatic disease, were treated and received a total of 211 cycles of therapy between May 1997 to March 1999. The median age of patients was 61.5 years. The patients were treated in the outpatient setting with a combination of gemcitabine 1,000 mg/M(2) intravenously over 30 minutes administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each cycle and cisplatin 50 mg/M(2) intravenously administered after gemcitabine infusion on Days 1 and 15 with adequate prehydration accompanied by adequate urinary output. Cycles were repeated every 28 days. Response and toxicity were assessed according to World Health Organization and standard criteria. RESULTS: The complete and partial response rate among all 42 registered patients was 11 of 42 patients (26%; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.42). Stabilization of disease was seen in 15 patients (38%). Two additional patients with metastatic disease who achieved major responses to chemotherapy were rendered free of disease surgically, achieving a complete response status. The median overall survival was 7.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.3-9.1 months), with 64% of patients alive at 6 months and 19% of patients alive at 12 months. The median time to disease progression was 5.4 months (range, 0.9-20.8 months). Major toxicities were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, with one episode of neutropenic fever. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin appeared to have significantly greater activity than single-agent gemcitabine in this Phase II study, with tolerable toxicity. The antitumor activity of this combination needs to be confirmed in multi-institutional or comparative trials.     

Phase II trial of biweekly infusional fluorouracil, folinic acid, and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the toxicity and activity of infusional fluorouracil (FU), folinic acid (FA), and oxaliplatin, administered every 2 weeks in patients with metastatic gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-one previously untreated patients with measurable adenocarcinoma of the stomach were eligible for the study. Patients received FU 2.6 g/m(2) (24-hour continuous infusion), FA 500 mg/m(2) (2-hour intravenous infusion), and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) (2-hour intravenous infusion) every 2 weeks for 6 weeks. Treatment was continued until progression of disease was observed. RESULTS: All patients were assessable for toxicity and 37 of 41 patients were assessable for response. Patient characteristics were: sex (male, 28; female,13), median age 60 years (range, 20 to 77 years), and median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1. Response was evaluated every 6 weeks. Of 37 assessable patients, one complete and 15 partial remissions were observed (overall response rate, 43%). Stable disease was observed in 12 patients (32%) and progressive disease in nine patients (24%). The median overall survival was 9.6 months. WHO grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities included neutropenia in two patients (4.9%) and thrombocytopenia in one patient (2.4%). Other WHO grade 3 or 4 toxicities included diarrhea in three patients (7.3%) and vomiting in two patients (4.9%). There were no cases of grade 3 peripheral neuropathy and no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: Biweekly fluorouracil, folinic acid, and oxaliplatin is active and well-tolerated in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Response rates, time to progression, and overall survival were comparable to those achieved with other combination chemotherapy regimens, including FOLFOX6, with significantly less toxicity.     

Phase II trial of cisplatin and gemcitabine in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: This phase II study was performed to determine the efficacy and toxicity of cisplatin and gemcitabine in patients with advanced gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty chemo-na?ve patients with measurable locoregionally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer were included; the median patient age was 53 years (range 35-71). Cisplatin was administered at a dose of 50 mg/m2, given in 1 h intravenously (i.v.) on days 1 and 8, followed after 24 h by gemcitabine at a dose of 800 mg/m2 given in 30 min i.v. on days 2, 9 and 16, every 28 days. RESULTS: A median number of four therapy cycles were given (range 2-8). Myelosuppresion was the most important toxicity. Grade 3-4 thrombopenia was observed in 19 patients (48%) and grade 3-4 leukopenia was observed in 23 (58%). Myelotoxicity was cumulative and caused omission of gemcitabine on day 16 in 55% of cycles. Non-haematological toxicity consisted mainly of grade 1-2 nausea and vomiting. Objective responses were observed in 30% of patients including two complete remissions and 10 partial remissions. Median survival was 11 months (range 3-27+). CONCLUSIONS: This cisplatin-gemcitabine regimen had moderate efficacy in patients with advanced gastric cancer, with manageable toxicity. Further studies with this combination may be warranted.     

Phase II study of regimen of gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND: Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is the standard treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Many novel drugs, including gemcitabine, navelbine, paclitaxel and docetaxel have been used in combination with cisplatin. Of these drugs, gemcitabine is reported to have a high response rate and acceptable toxicity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin. METHODS: Thirty-two patients with NSCLC, who met the selection criteria from June 1998 to January 1999, were enrolled. All of them were confirmed by histology and were in an advanced stage, i.e. stage IIIB with pleural effusion or stage IV. Cisplatin at a dose of 80 mg/m2 was given monthly on day 15, in combination with gemcitabine at a dose of 1000 mg/m2 administered on days 1, 8 and 15 of the 28-day cycle. RESULTS: Of the 32 assessable patients, two showed complete remission and 11 achieved partial remission. The overall response was 40.6% (95% CI, 24.8-56.4%). The median time to disease progression was 7.2 months (95% CI, 4.87-9.53 months). The major hematological toxicity was neutropenia. Seven patients (22.9%) developed grade 3 and 4 neutropenia, but none developed febrile neutropenia. One patient (3.1%) had grade 3 thrombocytopenia. One patient (3.1%) developed grade 3 anemia. Nausea and vomiting were seen in 12 patients (37.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The regimen of combined gemcitabine with cisplatin is safe and effective. With this combination, a lower dose of cisplatin seems to have an efficacy similar to that in previous reports.     

A study of infusional cisplatin and infusional fluorouracil for locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a Mid-Atlantic Oncology Program study.

A combination of cisplatin administered as a 24-hour infusion and fluorouracil administered as a 5-day infusion was used to treat 97 patients with non-small-cell lung (NSCLC) cancer in a phase II trial. Thirty patients had stage IIIB disease; 67 patients, stage IV disease (new international classification). Patients with stage IIIB disease also received thoracic radiation after chemotherapy. The regimen was well tolerated, with 24% or less grade 3 or greater toxicities of all types. One toxic death was attributed to fluid overload. The response rate, partial and complete, was 43% (95% confidence interval, 27% to 63%), and median survival was 13.8 months for patients with stage IIIB disease. Response rates refer to the chemotherapy response. For patients with stage IV disease, the response rate was 34% (95% confidence interval, 24% to 47%), and median survival was 6.2 months. On this regimen, stable-disease patients with stage IV disease had survivals at least equal to responders.     

Phase II study of radiotherapy combined with gemcitabine for locally advanced pancreatic cancer

Gemcitabine has been reported to be a potent radiosensitiser in human pancreatic cell lines. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of radiotherapy combined with gemcitabine for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. In all, 42 patients with pancreatic cancer that was unresectable but confined to the pancreatic region were treated with external-beam radiation (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions over 5.5 weeks) and weekly gemcitabine (250 mg m(-2), 30-min infusion). Maintenance gemcitabine (1000 mg m(-2) weekly x 3 every 4 weeks) was initiated 1 month after the completion of the chemoradiotherapy and continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Of the 42 patients, 38 (90%) completed the scheduled course of chemoradiotherapy. The major toxicity was leucopenia and anorexia. There was one death attributed to duodenal bleeding and sepsis. The median survival time was 9.5 months and the 1-year survival rate was 28%. The median progression-free survival time was 4.4 months. In 35 patients with documented disease progression at the time of analysis, 34 (97%) showed distant metastasis as the cause of the initial disease progression. The chemoradiotherapy used in this study has a moderate activity against locally advanced pancreatic cancer and an acceptable toxicity profile. Future investigations for treatment with more systemic effects are warranted.     

国产吉西他滨联合5-氟尿嘧啶治疗晚期胰腺癌临床观察

目的:观察国产吉西他滨联合5-氟尿嘧啶治疗晚期胰腺癌临床疗效及不良反应.方法:19例晚期胰腺癌患者随机分为两组,观察组10例,给予GCF方案(吉西他滨联合5-氟尿嘧啶),21天为1周期;对照组9例,给予FAM方案(5-氟尿嘧啶联合阿霉素、丝裂霉素),21天为1周期,均至少化疗2周期.结果:19例患者均可评价疗效和不良反应.临床受益反应率明显优于对照组(50% vs 22%,P<0.05);观察组中位生存期和1年生存率也明显优于对照组(P<0.05);主要不良反应为白细胞下降、胃肠道反应,均较对照组轻,其它不良反应两组相似均可耐受.结论:吉西他滨联合5-氟尿嘧啶治疗晚期胰腺癌近期临床疗效较高,不良反应可以耐受.     

Phase II study of mitoxantrone, leucovorin, and infusional fluorouracil for treatment of metastatic breast cancer

A new combination of mitoxantrone, folinic acid (leucovorin), and infusional fluorouracil (5-FU) was administered to 57 previously treated patients with metastatic breast cancer to evaluate the response rate, response duration, and toxicity of this regimen. Fifty-three patients who received 313 courses of therapy were assessable for response and toxicity. Median age was 48 years (range, 33 to 80 years), and the patients had received an average of 1.5 chemotherapy regimens before this study. Of 53 assessable patients, 24 (45%, or 42% of all entered patients) experienced partial responses (PRs) with a median duration of 6 months (range, 2 to 13 months). Nine (69%) of 13 assessable patients without prior doxorubicin treatment responded, compared with 15 (38%) of 40 with prior doxorubicin (P less than .05). Toxicity was generally mild with dose reductions necessitated more often by mucositis and/or diarrhea than by myelosuppression. One patient with prior high-dose doxorubicin treatment developed congestive heart failure. The combination of mitoxantrone, leucovorin, and infusional 5-FU is an active and well-tolerated regimen for metastatic breast cancer and deserves further evaluation in patients without prior doxorubicin therapy.     

Activity of gemcitabine and continuous infusion fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Gemcitabine has been shown to improve survival and quality of life parameters compared to fluorouracil alone in advanced pancreatic cancer [J Clin Oncol 1997;15:2403-2413]. However, fluorouracil was given as a weekly bolus in that study and other administration schedules might be more effective. The objective of this trial was to determine the activity and toxicity of gemcitabine in combination with continuous infusion (CI) fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-na?ve patients with measurable advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were treated with gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) intravenously weekly x 3 followed by 1 week of rest every 4 weeks and 200 mg/m(2)/day CI fluorouracil until disease progression or limiting toxicity. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. Objective partial responses were documented in 5 patients (20%; 95% confidence interval 6.8-40.7%) and disease stabilization or minor responses in 13 patients (52%; 31.3-72.2%). Toxicity was mild with grade 2/3 leucopenia in 26%, stomatitis in 15%, nausea in 6%, diarrhea in 3%, and hand-foot syndrome in 2% of the treatment cycles. In 3 patients a catheter thrombus occurred and in 1 patient the treatment had to be stopped due to asthenia. The performance status improved in 39% of the patients and 65% benefitted in terms of a decrease in pain intensity or consumption of analgesics. CONCLUSION: This phase II trial confirms a significant antitumor activity and a beneficial clinical effect of gemcitabine plus CI fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic cancer. The combination is well tolerated and it will have to be shown whether oral fluoropyrimidines can increase the practicability of this treatment without impairing efficacy.     

Phase II study to evaluate combining gemcitabine with flutamide in advanced pancreatic cancer patients

A phase II study was undertaken to determine the safety of combining flutamide with gemcitabine, with response rate being the primary end point. Twenty-seven patients with histologically proven, previously untreated, unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma received gemcitabine, 1 g m(-2) intravenously on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28 day cycle, and flutamide 250 mg given orally three times daily. Treatment was halted if there was unacceptable toxicity, or evidence of disease progression. Toxicity was documented every cycle. Tumour assessment was undertaken after cycles 2 and 4, and thereafter at least every additional four cycles. One hundred and seventeen cycles of treatment were administered, median four cycles per patient (range 1-18). Gemcitabine combined with flutamide was well tolerated, with most toxicities being recorded as grade 1 or 2 and only nine treatment cycles associated with grade 3 toxicity. The most frequent toxicity was myelosuppression. One case of transient jaundice was recorded. The commonest symptomatic toxicity was nausea and vomiting. The response rate was 15% (four partial responses), median survival 6 months and 22% of patients were alive at 1 year. These results suggest antitumour activity of the combination therapy to be equivalent to single agent gemcitabine.     

Phase II study of combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Patients na?ve to chemotherapy who had histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were entered. Gemcitabine was given at a dose of 1000 mg/m2 over 30 min on days 1, 8 and 15, and cisplatin was given at a dose of 80 mg/m2 over 150 min on day 1, in 28-day cycles. RESULTS: A total of 38 patients were enrolled in this study between August 2001 and December 2003. There were no complete responses and 10 partial responses, resulting in an overall response rate of 26% (95% CI: 13.4-43.1%]. Twenty-one patients (55%) had stable disease, whereas 7 (18%) had progressive disease. The median time to progression was 4.2 months and the median overall survival was 7.5 months with a 1-year survival rate of 24%. Grade 3-4 toxicities included neutropenia in 26 patients (68%), thrombocytopenia in 19 (50%), anorexia in 15 (39%) and nausea in nine (24%). There was only one episode of neutropenic fever and there were no significant bleeding episodes or treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin administered by this schedule produced a good response rate associated with moderate but manageable toxicities in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.