Long-term response with everolimus for metastatic renal cell carcinoma refractory to sunitinib

A 70-year-old man with metastatic renal cell carcinoma developed progressive liver metastases after 8 weeks of treatment with the multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) sunitinib. He then participated in the phase III placebo-controlled clinical trial of the oral mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor everolimus, initially randomized to placebo (but had disease progression after 3 months) and crossed over to everolimus at time of unblinding. The patient had stable disease after 8 weeks (two cycles) of everolimus that was maintained until 28 months of therapy, at which time the patient had achieved a partial response. This case illustrates the potential for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, a malignancy with historically poor prognosis, to derive long-term benefit from everolimus when used in a manner consistent with its approved indication (after TKI therapy with sunitinib or sorafenib).     

Treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Purpose  To review the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), including the use of new targeted therapies. Methods  A search of MEDLINE (1966 to August 2008) and American Society of Clinical Oncology Meeting abstracts (2005 to May 2008) was preformed using the search terms bevacizumab, everolimus, interferon-alfa (IFN-α), interleukin-2 (IL-2), sorafenib, sunitinib, temsirolimus, and RCC. Articles most pertinent to the treatment of metastatic RCC are reviewed. Results  The treatment of metastatic RCC has undergone a paradigm shift over the past 5 years from biologic response modifiers to new targeted therapies. Historically, response rates for the biological response modifiers, aldesleukin (IL-2), and IFN-α were approximately 15%. Recently, three targeted agents, sorafenib, sunitinib, and temsirolimus have been approved for the treatment of RCC. Additionally, bevacizumab has been investigated and shown to increase progression free survival in RCC. IL-2 remains the only agent to induce complete, durable remissions; however, many patients are not eligible for this therapy. Newer agents (sorafenib, sunitinib, and temsirolimus) have shown to be superior to IFN-α or placebo and bevacizumab combined with IFN-α has shown activity when compared to IFN-α alone. Unlike IL-2, the greatest benefit obtained with targeted therapies is in achieving stable disease (SD). Despite their benefit, targeted therapies have never been compared with each other in clinical trials and choosing the most appropriate agent remains challenging. To date, the optimal sequence or combination of treatments has not been defined; however, everolimus has recently demonstrated activity in patients progressing on targeted therapy. Conclusions  IL-2 remains the most active regimen in inducing complete responses; however, its use is accompanied by substantial morbidity and is limited to those with a good performance status. Targeted therapies are also efficacious in the treatment of RCC, with the major benefit being induction of SD. Future research will better define the sequencing of therapies, as well as, explore the activity of novel combination regimens.     

Sunitinib re-challenge in metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated sequentially with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and everolimus

Therapy of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) requires sequential use of several agents with different mechanisms and minimal cross-resistance between the different agents. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors prolong progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with mRCC. Re-challenge with TKIs provides clinical benefit after everolimus in patients with mRCC. We report the case of an mRCC patient with lung and bone metastases, treated sequentially with sunitinib, sorafenib and everolimus. The patient had an objective response in reducing bone metastases, but adaptative and concomitant progression in lung metastases during sunitinib re-challenge. Previously, these lung metastases had responded to sunitinib. This intriguing paradox suggests that not only was sunitinib able to target a specific metastatic site during the re-challenge, as seen by the reduction of bone metastases, but it also elicited a more invasive adaptation and progression of lung tumor cells.     

A Phase I,Open-Label Study of Trebananib Combined With Sorafenib or Sunitinib in Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

BackgroundTrebananib, an investigational peptibody, binds to angiopoietin 1 and 2, thereby blocking their interaction with Tie2.Patients and MethodsThis open-label phase I study examined trebananib 3 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg intravenous (I.V.) once weekly plus sorafenib 400 mg twice per day or sunitinib 50 mg once per day in advanced RCC. Primary end points were adverse event incidence and pharmacokinetics.ResultsThirty-seven patients were enrolled. During trebananib plus sorafenib administration (n = 17), the most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) included rash (n = 12; 71%), diarrhea (n = 12; 71%), hypertension (n = 11; 65%), and fatigue (n = 11; 65%); grade ≥ 3 TRAEs (n = 7; 41%); and 2 patients (12%) had peripheral edema. During trebananib plus sunitinib administration (n = 19), the most common TRAEs included diarrhea (n = 14; 74%), fatigue (n = 13; 68%), hypertension (n = 11; 58%), and decreased appetite (n = 11; 58%); grade ≥ 3 TRAEs (n = 13; 68%); and 8 (42%) patients had peripheral edema. Trebananib did not appear to alter the pharmacokinetics of sorafenib or sunitinib. No patient developed anti-trebananib antibodies. Objective response rates were 29% (trebananib plus sorafenib) and 53% (trebananib plus sunitinib).ConclusionThe toxicities of trebananib 3 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg I.V. plus sorafenib or sunitinib in RCC were similar to those of sorafenib or sunitinib monotherapy, with peripheral edema being likely specific to the combinations. Antitumor activity was observed.     

Everolimus (RAD001) in the Treatment of Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Review

Historically, there have been few treatment options for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) besides immunotherapy with interleukin‐2 and interferon (IFN)‐α. Targeted therapies have improved clinical outcomes over the past several years. These include the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors sunitinib and sorafenib, which inhibit angiogenic signaling in endothelial cells and vascular pericytes predominantly through VEGFR and platelet‐derived growth factor receptor β. Also included is the anti‐VEGF monoclonal antibody bevacizumab used in combination with IFN‐α. These agents mediate their antitumor effects by interfering with the VEGF signaling pathway, thereby inhibiting angiogenesis and causing tumor shrinkage. However, ultimately, most patients develop resistance and experience disease progression during VEGF/VEGFR‐targeted therapy, and until the recent approval of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor everolimus (RAD001), there were no agents available with proven activity in this setting. This review describes the clinical development of everolimus in advanced RCC and the rationale for the use of mTOR inhibitors after failure of VEGF/VEGFR inhibitors.     

Practical management of sunitinib toxicities in the treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are infrequent malignancies which manifest in both functional (hormone-secreting) and more commonly non-functional (non-secreting) forms. The oral multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor everolimus are approved as targeted therapies for patients with well-differentiated, non-resectable disease and evidence of disease progression. The recent approval of sunitinib for the management of advanced pNET is based on a continuous daily dosing (CDD) schedule that differs from the intermittent 4 weeks on/2 weeks off (4/2) schedule approved for sunitinib in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Therefore, although clinicians may be familiar with therapy management approaches for sunitinib in advanced RCC and GIST, there is less available experience for the management of patients with a CDD schedule. Here, we discuss the similarities and differences in the treatment of pNET with sunitinib compared with advanced RCC and GIST. In particular, we focus on the occurrence and management of sunitinib-related toxicity in patients with pNET by drawing on experience in these other malignancies. We aim to provide a relevant and useful guide for clinicians treating patients with pNET covering the management of events such as fatigue, mucositis, hand–foot syndrome, and hypertension.     

Sequential treatment with sorafenib and sunitinib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: clinical outcomes from a retrospective clinical study

Sorafenib and sunitinib are inhibitors of receptor protein tyrosine kinases (TKIs) and are approved for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Although the mTOR inhibitor everolimus is effective for the treatment of patients who have failed TKI therapy, it is important to consider all available treatment options before switching therapy mode of action. Herein, we report outcomes in patients with mRCC switched to sorafenib following disease progression on sunitinib treatment. The medical records of 35 patients treated between November 2006 and November 2009 at two large referral centers in Greece were retrospectively analyzed for time-to-progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and tolerability of sorafenib after sunitinib. Median TTP and OS on sorafenib were 4.9 and 11.5 months, respectively. Among 33 patients evaluable for tumor response, three had a partial response and 17 achieved disease stabilization (objective response rate 8.5%; total clinical benefit rate 57%). Sorafenib was well tolerated, with mostly grade 1/2 adverse events and no treatment-related deaths. Sorafenib was effective and well tolerated in this group of patients. The TTP with sorafenib following sunitinib was comparable to outcomes reported previously, providing further support that TKIs should be used in sequence before switching to an mTOR inhibitor.     

Temsirolimus in metastatic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma after interferon and sorafenib therapy

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC) is a common subtype of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), occurring in 6-11% of renal carcinoma patients. Limited clinical trial data have shown minimal activity with cytokines and chemotherapy, although small-molecule inhibitors of the vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor pathways such as sunitinib and sorafenib, which are associated with significant clinical activity in clear-cell RCC (ccRCC), have been associated with a 25% response rate in chRCC. The mammalian target of rapamycin kinase inhibitor temsirolimus demonstrates good clinical activity in ccRCC patients with poor prognosis, with further data suggesting it is an effective treatment for all RCC tumour histologies. This report describes the case of a patient with chRCC who experienced rapid improvement in his general condition and stable disease on treatment with temsirolimus, following disease progression on interferon alfa and sorafenib treatment. This case report suggests that temsirolimus is an effective and appropriate treatment for this RCC tumour subtype.     

Final results of the European Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Sorafenib (EU-ARCCS) expanded-access study: a large open-label study in diverse community settings

BackgroundThe European Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Sorafenib (EU-ARCCS) expanded-access study provided sorafenib to advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients in whom previous systemic therapy had failed. The study assessed the safety and use of sorafenib for the treatment of advanced RCC in a large community-based patient population across 11 countries in Europe.Patients and methodsEU-ARCCS was a single-arm, open-label trial of sorafenib in advanced RCC patients. End points included safety, time to progression, progression-free survival (PFS), and disease control rate (DCR). Subgroup analyses included age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, histology, prior therapy, and number and sites of metastases.ResultsAbout 1159 advanced RCC patients were enrolled. Most patients (94%) experienced drug-related adverse events (AEs) of any grade, with the most common grade ≥3 AEs including hand–foot skin reaction (13%), diarrhea (7%), fatigue (7%), hypertension (6%), and rash/desquamation (5%). The incidence of AEs in the subgroups was similar to that in the overall population. Median PFS was 6.6 months; DCR at ≥8 and ≥12 weeks was 85% and 78%, respectively.ConclusionsThe sorafenib safety profile in European community-based practice settings was similar to that reported in clinical trials. The heterogeneous advanced RCC patient population in EU-ARCCS permitted assessment of sorafenib in important subpopulations of advanced RCC patients.     

Patients with advanced and metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with targeted therapy in the Czech Republic: twenty cancer centres, six agents, one database

The incidence and mortality of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the Czech Republic are among the highest in the world. Several targeted agents have been recently approved for the treatment of advanced/metastatic RCC. Objective: Presentation of a national clinical database for monitoring and assessment of patients with advanced/metastatic RCC treated with targeted therapy. The RenIS (RENal Information System, http://renis.registry.cz) registry is a non-interventional post-registration database of epidemiological and clinical data of patients with RCC treated with targeted therapies in the Czech Republic. Twenty cancer centres eligible for targeted therapy administration participate in the project. As of November 2011, six agents were approved and reimbursed from public health insurance, including bevacizumab, everolimus, pazopanib, sorafenib, sunitinib, and temsirolimus. As of 10 October 2011, 1,541 patients with valid records were entered into the database. Comparison with population-based data from the Czech National Cancer Registry revealed that RCC patients treated with targeted therapy are significantly younger (median age at diagnosis 59 vs. 66?years). Most RenIS registry patients were treated with sorafenib and sunitinib, many patients sequentially with both agents. Over 10?% of patients were also treated with everolimus in the second or third line. Progression-free survival times achieved were comparable to phase III clinical trials. The RenIS registry has become an important tool and source of information for the management of cancer care and clinical practice, providing comprehensive data on monitoring and assessment of RCC targeted therapy on a national level.     

Targeted therapies used sequentially in metastatic renal cell cancer: overall results from a large experience

Targeted therapies have improved survival in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (RCC); however, expert opinion on the optimal therapeutic strategy is divided. This retrospective study evaluates different sequential schemes of targeted therapies in 310 patients with advanced/metastatic RCC who received different systemic agents - sorafenib, sunitinib, bevacizumab, everolimus, temsirolimus and axitinib - alone or in different sequences, until disease progression or intolerable toxicity (median follow-up: 37 months). The median overall survival (OS) was 22 months and the 5-year OS was 23.4%; differential therapeutic schemes were not associated with differences in OS. A worse performance status, no nephrectomy and a poor-risk classification according to the Motzer criteria was associated with a shorter OS. These findings support the use of targeted therapies in the treatment of RCC, even in a large unselected population from a single institution, and suggest that treatment should be tailored to meet individual circumstances and needs.     

Sorafenib and sunitinib for elderly patients with renal cell carcinoma

BackgroundSunitinib and sorafenib are small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors with known antitumor activity in advanced renal cell carcinoma.Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively assess the response and tolerance of elderly patients with renal cell carcinoma to these two agents. Data of patients aged ≥ 70 years receiving sorafenib or sunitinib at the Centre Léon Bérard were analyzed. Forty-eight patients received sorafenib or sunitinib as a first line treatment, 8 received sorafenib followed by sunitinib and 4 received the reverse sequence. Objective responses (ORs), stable disease (SD), toxicity, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were reported.ResultsSorafenib and sunitinib achieved similar OR + SD rates (79% vs. 71% respectively). Median PFS was 6 months in first-line sorafenib treated patients and 5 months in the sunitinib group. Median OS was 16 months in first-line sorafenib-treated patients and 15 months in the sunitinib group. In patients receiving sorafenib followed by sunitinib, median PFS was 11.5 months, and median OS was 13.1 months. With the reverse sequence, median PFS was 8.1 months and median OS was 15 months. Treatment modifications were more frequent in sunitinib-treated patients, in first or second line (75% vs. 50%). Limitations are the retrospective design of the study and the small number of patients.ConclusionFirst-line sunitinib and sorafenib seem equally efficient in elderly patients treated for advanced renal carcinomas, but sunitinib is less well tolerated. Sequential treatment with sorafenib followed by sunitinib seems to be better tolerated. These results should be confirmed in a larger prospective study.     

Second-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma after first-line targeted therapy

Cytokines were the only drugs proven to be effective for advanced renal cell carcinoma(RCC). Introducing the targeted drugs prolonged patients' survival. However, limited high-quality evidence is now available for second-line treatment. Everolimus is effective for patients who have experienced progression of disease after sunitinib and/or sorafenib. Further prospective study including the sequencing of targeted drugs is warranted to develop better treatment strategies.     

Updates on novel therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) poses one of the great therapeutic challenges in oncology. RCC is predominantly refractory to treatment with traditional cytotoxic chemotherapies, and until recently management options were limited to immunotherapy or palliative care. However, in the past few years we have experienced a sea change in the treatment of advanced RCC with the introduction of targeted therapies that derive their efficacy at least in part through alterations in tumor angiogenesis. The tyrosine kinase inhibitors sunitinib, pazopanib, and sorafenib, the monoclonal antibody bevacizumab (in combination with interferon-α), and the rapamycin analogs, temsirolimus and everolimus, are now approved agents in the United States for the treatment of metastatic RCC. Efforts to expand upon these successes include developing novel antiangiogenic agents, optimizing concomitant and sequential regimens, identifying predictors of response to specific treatments, and further dissecting the underlying molecular pathogenesis of RCC to reveal novel therapeutic targets.     

Combination Systemic Therapy for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

Outcomes for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have improved significantly in recent years with the development of novel noncytotoxic systemic therapies. The multitargeted kinase inhibitors sunitinib and sorafenib have been approved for the treatment of advanced RCC, and bevacizumab, a monoclonal anti–vascular endothelial growth factor antibody, has shown significant clinical activity, both as a single agent and in combination with interferon‐α. The mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors temsirolimus and everolimus have led to longer overall survival times in poor‐risk patients in the first‐line setting and longer progression‐free survival times in kinase inhibitor refractory patients in the second‐line setting, respectively. Despite these advances, almost all patients develop resistance to treatment and cure is rarely seen. There is therefore a need to overcome resistance, induce longer lasting remissions, and improve survival. A potential approach to this is to combine active agents, and the clinical data for combination therapy with novel targeted agents in advanced RCC are reviewed here.     

Effects of preset sequential administrations of sunitinib and everolimus on tumour differentiation in Caki-1 renal cell carcinoma

Background:

Sunitinib (VEGFR/PDGFR inhibitor) and everolimus (mTOR inhibitor) are both approved for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) as first-line and second-line therapy, respectively. In the clinics, sunitinib treatment is limited by the emergence of acquired resistance, leading to a switch to second-line treatment at progression, often based on everolimus. No data have been yet generated on programmed alternating sequential strategies combining alternative use of sunitinib and everolimus before progression. Such strategy is expected to delay the emergence of acquired resistance and improve tumour control. The aim of our study was to assess the changes in tumours induced by three different sequences administration of sunitinib and everolimus.

Methods:

In human Caki-1 RCC xenograft model, sunitinib was alternated with everolimus every week, every 2 weeks, or every 3 weeks. Effects on necrosis, hypoxia, angiogenesis, and EMT status were assessed by immunohisochemistry and immunofluorescence.

Results:

Sunitinib and everolimus programmed sequential regimens before progression yielded longer median time to tumour progression than sunitinib and everolimus monotherapies. In each group of treatment, tumour growth control was associated with inhibition of mTOR pathway and changes from a mesenchymal towards an epithelial phenotype, with a decrease in vimentin and an increase in E-cadherin expression. The sequential combinations of these two agents in a RCC mouse clinical trial induced antiangiogenic effects, leading to tumour necrosis.

Conclusions:

In summary, our study showed that alternate sequence of sunitinib and everolimus mitigated the development of mesenchymal phenotype compared with sunitinib as single agent.     

肾癌的靶向治疗

 目前转移性肾癌是最难治的恶性肿瘤之一。基于肾癌发生的分子机制的阐明，从而导致发展有希望治疗靶点的新药。在临床研究中，舒尼替尼和索拉芬尼是治疗晚期或转移性肾癌有明显的效果和可处理的毒性，它属于口服的多靶点酪氨酸激酶抑制剂，抑制血管内皮生长因子受体与血小板衍生的生长因子受体和C-KIT受体酪氨酸激酶。这两种药很快批准作为第二线药物治疗肾癌，并将用作第一线治疗。舒尼替尼或索拉芬尼作为单剂治疗与联合方案治疗肾癌值得进一步研究     

Management of adverse events associated with the use of everolimus in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma

Purpose

In April 2009, an expert group of 11 physicians and clinical nurses met to discuss the management of selected adverse events associated with the use of everolimus for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Everolimus is an orally administered inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin that recently received approval from the European Medicines Agency for the treatment of advanced RCC that has progressed on or after treatment with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted therapy, and from the United States Food and Drug Administration for treatment of advanced RCC after failure of sorafenib or sunitinib. Before the approval of everolimus, no standard therapy existed for the treatment of mRCC after failure of VEGF-targeted therapy. RECORD-1 (Renal Cell cancer treatment with Oral RAD001 given Daily) was the pivotal multicenter, phase III, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of everolimus that led to approval for patients with disease progression on or after treatment with VEGF-targeted agents. Safety data from RECORD-1 were reviewed by these clinicians, all of whom had experience using everolimus in patients with mRCC. Adverse events discussed were non-infectious pneumonitis, infections, stomatitis and metabolic abnormalities.

Results

The outcome of this discussion is summarised here. Guidance for management of these adverse events is provided. Both clinicians and patients should be aware of the potential side-effects of everolimus and understand that these side-effects are manageable with standard care to optimise patient benefit.     

Successful treatment of brain metastases from renal cell cancer using radiotherapy in combination with sorafenib

Sorafenib, an antiangiogenic drug, has been introduced for treatment of disseminated renal cell cancer (RCC), a tumor that is radioresistant. We report a case of 51-year-old patient with disseminated RCC who received 30 Gy per ten fractions of radiotherapy (RT) for a single brain metastasis. While the brain metastasis remained stable, the patient had to receive interferon-alpha and later sorafenib due to progression of his extra-cerebral metastases. During sorafenib therapy, complete remission of the cerebral lesion and excellent partial remission of the extra-cerebral metastases were observed. Meanwhile, the patient developed a second cerebral metastasis, which was irradiated only with 20 Gy per ten fractions during a short break in the sorafenib treatment. The follow-up computed tomographies revealed complete remission of the second metastasis and development of brain necrosis in a moderately irradiated area. The case of this patient being his own control demonstrates sorafenib-mediated potentiation of RT effects both in tumor and normal tissues.