Evaluation of patient doses in interventional radiology]

PURPOSE: To verify the suitability of indicative quantities to evaluate the risk related to patient exposure, in abdominal and vascular interventional radiology, by the study of correlations between dosimetric quantities and other indicators. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed in vivo measurements of entrance skin dose (ESD) and dose area product (DAP) during 48 procedures to evaluate the correlation among dosimetric quantities, and an estimation of spatial distribution of exposure and effective dose (E). To measure DAP we used a transmission ionization chamber and to evaluate ESD and its spatial distribution we used radiographic film packed in a single envelope and placed near the patient's skin. E was estimated by a calculation software using data from film digitalisation. RESULTS: From the data derived for measurements in 27 interventional procedures on 48 patients we obtained a DAP to E conversion factor of 0.15 mSv / Gy cm2, with an excellent correlation (r=.99). We also found a good correlation between DAP and exposure parameters such as fluoroscopy time and number of images. The greatest effective dose was evaluated for a multiple procedure in the hepatic region, with a DAP value of 425 Gy cm2. The greatest ESD was about 550 mGy. For groups of patients undergoing similar interventional procedures the correlation between ESD and DAP had conversion factors from 6 to 12 mGy Gy-1 cm-2. CONCLUSION: The evaluation of ESD and E by slow films represents a valid method for patient dosimetry in interventional radiology. The good correlation between DAP and fluoroscopy time and number of images confirm the suitability of these indicators as basic dosimetric information. All the ESD values found are lower than threshold doses for deterministic effects.     

Fluoroscopy: patient radiation exposure issues.

Fluoroscopic procedures (particularly prolonged interventional procedures) may involve high patient radiation doses. The radiation dose depends on the type of examination, the patient size, the equipment, the technique, and many other factors. The performance of the fluoroscopy system with respect to radiation dose is best characterized by the receptor entrance exposure and skin entrance exposure rates, which should be assessed at regular intervals. Management of patient exposure involves not only measurement of these rates but also clinical monitoring of patient doses. Direct monitoring of patient skin doses during procedures is highly desirable, but current methods still have serious limitations. Skin doses may be reduced by using intermittent exposures, grid removal, last image hold, dose spreading, beam filtration, pulsed fluoroscopy, and other dose reduction techniques. Proper training of fluoroscopic operators, understanding the factors that influence radiation dose, and use of various dose reduction techniques may allow effective management of patient dose.     

Evaluation and estimation of entrance skin dose in patients during diagnostic and interventional radiology procedures

A study was performed to evaluate the total entrance skin dose (ESD) of patients during diagnostic and interventional radiology procedures (IVR) and to estimate ESD with body mass index (BMI) and fluoroscopy time. The study included 26 cases of transcatheter arterial embolization therapy (TAE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and 19 cases of diagnostic digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for HCC. The ESD of patients was evaluated with a zinc-cadmium sensor linked to a digital counter (SDM: skin dose monitor). Exposure doses were measured with SDM attached to the front of the X-ray beam-limiting device like a dose area product monitor. ESD was calculated from the measured exposure dose. In 26 TAE for HCC, ESD was 1793.7+/-739.1 mGy, with the mean fluoroscopic time of 23.5 minutes and 4.4 DSA acquisitions. The fluoroscopic dose rate was 52.4+/-11.5 mGy/min. In 19 diagnostic DSA for HCC, ESD was 962.9+/-375.2 mGy, with the mean fluoroscopic time of 11.1 minutes and 4.0 DSA acquisitions. The fluoroscopic dose rate was 32.7+/-12.7 mGy/min. Although 33.2% of ESD was from fluoroscopy in diagnostic procedures, the figure was 68.8% in TAE procedures. It was demonstrated that the increase in ESD during IVR was caused by the rise of fluoroscopy dose rate caused by high-magnification fluoroscopy and the extension of fluoroscopy time. In order to reduce ESD, it is necessary to use a low fluoroscopy dose rate with low-rate pulse fluoroscopy, in addition to shortening fluoroscopy time. Fluoroscopy time was a poor predictor of risk because it did not correlate well with ESD during IVR (diagnostic procedures r(2)= 0.897, IVR r(2)= 0.594). However, ESD correlated well with the product of BMI and fluoroscopy time (diagnostic procedures r(2)= 0.910, IVR r(2)= 0.783). The linear relationship between ESD and the product of BMI and fluoroscopy time provides a simple monitoring mechanism of the ESD delivered to the patient during interventional radiology procedures. This linear relationship needs to be established for other types of interventional procedures.     

Benefits and safety of CT fluoroscopy in interventional radiologic procedures

PURPOSE: To determine the benefits and safety of computed tomographic (CT) fluoroscopy when compared with conventional CT for the guidance of interventional radiologic procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on 203 consecutive percutaneous interventional procedures performed with use of CT fluoroscopic guidance and 99 consecutive procedures with conventional CT guidance were obtained from a questionnaire completed by the radiologists and CT technologists who performed the procedures. The questionnaire specifically addressed radiation dose measurements to patients and personnel, total procedure time, total CT fluoroscopy time, mode of CT fluoroscopic guidance (continuous versus intermittent), success of procedure, major complications, type of procedure (biopsy, aspiration, or drainage), site of procedure, and level of operator experience. RESULTS: The median calculated patient absorbed dose per procedure and the median procedure time with CT fluoroscopy were 94% less and 32% less, respectively, than those measurements with conventional CT scanning (P <.05). An intermittent mode of image acquisition was used in 97% of the 203 cases. This resulted in personnel radiation dosimetric readings below measurable levels in all cases. CONCLUSION: As implemented at the authors' institution, use of CT fluoroscopy for the guidance of interventional radiologic procedures markedly decreased patient radiation dose and total procedure time compared with use of conventional CT guidance.     

Digital radiography of scoliosis with a scanning method: initial evaluation

PURPOSE: To evaluate the radiation dose, image quality, and Cobb angle measurements obtained with a digital scanning method of scoliosis radiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multiple images were reconstructed into one image at a workstation. A low-dose alternative was to use digital pulsed fluoroscopy. Dose measurements were performed with thermoluminescent dosimeters in an Alderson phantom. At the same time, kerma area-product values were recorded. A Monte Carlo dose calculation also was performed. Image quality was evaluated with a contrast-detail phantom and visual grading system. Angle measurements were evaluated with an angle phantom and measurements obtained on patient images. RESULTS: The effective radiation dose was 0.087 mSv for screen-film imaging, 0.16 mSv for digital exposure imaging, and 0.017 mSv for digital fluoroscopy; the corresponding kerma area-product values were 0.43, 0.87, and 0.097 Gy. cm(2), respectively. The image quality of the digital exposure and screen-film images was about equal at visual grading, whereas fluoroscopy had lower image quality. The angle phantom had lower angle values with digital fluoroscopy, although the difference in measured angles was less than 0.5 degrees. The patient images showed no difference in angles. CONCLUSION: The described digital scanning method has acceptable image quality and adequate accuracy in angle measurements. The radiation dose required for digital exposure imaging is higher than that required for screen-film imaging, but that required for digital fluoroscopy is much lower.     

Evaluation of patient entrance dose rate of interventional X-ray equipment

Because interventional radiology (IVR) procedures are being performed with increasing frequency, patient X-ray exposure dose for X-ray fluoroscopic and radiographic procedures should not be ignored. In order to avoid excessive X-ray exposure, exposure dose rate limits are specified in the Japanese Industrial Standards (JIS) and by civil law at 50 mGy/min for usual fluoroscopy and 125 mGy/min for high-dose fluoroscopy. In the present study, we examined the difference in patient incident dose rate before and after using an X-ray generator that satisfied the above requirements. For incident dose to the image intensifier (I.I.), we investigated the differences between continuous and pulsed fluoroscopy, the effects of additional filters (Ta: tantalum, Al: aluminum), and the form of the X-ray spectrum. For pulsed fluoroscopy using PMMA (polymethyl-methacrylate), the maximum patient incident dose rates of usual and high-dose fluoroscopy were 59 mGy/min and 151 mGy/min, respectively. With regard to I.I. incident dose, saturation was observed beginning at a PMMA of 20 cm, and the X-ray dose was insufficient. In terms of the difference in patient incident dose rate with Ta and Al filters, the dose rate with the Ta filter was approximately 50% lower than that with the Al filter except for the saturation area. Concerning the X-ray spectrum, it was considered that a Ta filter not only minimizes patient X-ray exposure (because Ta reduces soft X-rays more effectively than Al) but also minimizes scattered X-rays because it filters out hard X-rays, leading to improved image quality. However, the use of the filter is appropriate only when a sufficient I.I. incident dose can be ensured. Specifically, the use of the filter under saturation conditions can lead to deterioration in image quality. Therefore, IVR X-ray systems must be equipped with an appropriate filter for reducing X-ray exposure while maintaining a sufficient I.I. incident dose rate.     

Patient radiation doses and references levels in interventional radiology

PURPOSE: To set Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) in interventional radiology by means of dose area product (DAP) measurements and the grouping of homogeneous procedures, and to quantify the associated errors in the DRL estimates. To evaluate the Mean Effective Doses per single procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Interventional radiology procedures were divided into four main groups: neuroradiological, vascular, extravascular and paediatric. Neuroradiological and vascular procedures were further divided into diagnostic and interventional procedures. Starting from DAP and total fluoroscopy time measurements in 1,256 patients, the DRLs were determined for 17 procedures, together with an estimate of their uncertainty. The correlation between fluoroscopy time and DAP was assessed. Mean effective dose estimates were obtained from measured DAP values and from the analysis of the dosimetric data reported in the literature for similar procedures. RESULTS: The main features of DAP distributions are long high-dose tails, indicating asymmetric distributions, together with a large interquartile range. Rounded third-quartile values of DAP distributions showed a large range in the procedures taken into consideration. Values of 147, 198, 338 Gy cm(2)were obtained for supra-aortic angiography, cerebral angiography and embolization. Values of 86-101 and 459-438 Gy cm(2)were obtained for diagnostic and interventional vascular procedures on the lower limbs and on the abdomen, respectively. Values of 25-33 Gy cm(2)were obtained for retrograde cystourethrographies and ERCP, and values of 62-158 Gy cm(2)were obtained for nephrostomy and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography. The correlation between total fluoroscopy time and the DAP values was poor. Mean effective dose estimates showed lower values for extravascular procedures (4.8-28.2 mSv), intermediate values for neuroradiological procedures (12.6-32.9 mSv) and higher values for vascular procedures involving the abdomen (36.5-86.8 mSv). DISCUSSION: DAP values were generally higher in vascular than in extravascular procedures. In generally, interventional vascular procedures show higher DAP values than the corresponding diagnostic procedures, with the exception of the abdominal region where the values were similar. Extravascular procedures with percutaneous access show significantly higher DAP values than those with endoscopic access. Total fluoroscopy time is a poor predictor of patient doses in interventional radiology. CONCLUSIONS: The systematic recording of DAP values, together with adequate grouping of similar procedures makes it possible to establish stable DRLs on a local basis and to carry out dosimetric evaluations, although on a statistical rather than individual basis. Patient radiation doses during interventional radiological procedures may be high, particularly when the abdominal region is involved.     

Radiation dose and image quality in diagnostic radiology. Optimization of the dose-image quality relationship with clinical experience from scoliosis radiography,coronary intervention and a flat-panel digital detector

X-rays are known to cause malignancies, skin damage and other side effects and they are thus potentially dangerous. Therefore, it is essential and in fact mandatory to reduce the radiation dose in diagnostic radiology as far as possible. This is also known as the ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) principle. However, the dose is linked to image quality and the image quality may not be lowered so far that it jeopardizes the diagnostic outcome of a radiographic procedure. The process of reaching this balance between dose and image quality is called optimization. The aim of this thesis was to propose and evaluate methods for optimizing the radiation dose-image quality relationship in diagnostic radiography with a focus on clinical usefulness. The work was performed in three main parts. OPTIMIZATION OF SCOLIOSIS RADIOGRAPHY: In the first part, two recently developed methods for digital scoliosis radiography (digital exposure and pulse fluoroscopy) were evaluated and compared to the standard screen-film method. Radiation dose was measured as kerma area-product (KAP), entrance surface dose (ESD) and effective dose; image quality was assessed with a contrast-detail phantom and through visual grading analysis. Accuracy in angle measurements was also evaluated. The radiation dose for digital exposure was nearly twice as high as the screen-film method at a comparable image quality while the dose for pulsed fluoroscopy was very low but with a considerably lower image quality. The variability in angle measurements was sufficiently low for all methods. Then, the digital exposure protocol was optimized to a considerably lower dose with a slightly lower image quality compared to the baseline. FLAT-PANEL DETECTOR: In the second part, an amorphous-silicon direct digital flat-panel detector was evaluated using a contrast-detail phantom, measuring dose as entrance dose. The flat-panel detector yielded a superior image quality at a lower dose than both storage phosphor plates and screen-film. Equivalent image quality compared to storage phosphor plates was reached at about one-third of the dose. OPTIMIZATION OF PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION (PCI): In the third part, influence of various settings on radiation dose and image quality in coronary catheterisation and PCI was investigated. Based on these findings, the dose rate for fluoroscopy was reduced to one-third. The dose reduction was evaluated in a clinical series of 154 PCI procedures before and 138 after the optimization. Through this optimization, the total KAP was significantly reduced to two-thirds of the original value. IN SUMMARY: This thesis indicates the possibility of dose reduction in diagnostic radiology through optimization of the radiographic process.     

Multislice CT fluoroscopy: technical principles, clinical applications and dosimetry

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is describing fluoroscopic techniques with multislice CT during interventional procedures. We emphasize the technical principles of the multislice CT fluoroscopy and the relative advantages in clinical application, in comparison to single slice fluoroCT and conventional CT guided procedures. Other topics are dosimetry and patient's and operator's radioprotection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We describe our experience in 60 cases of interventional procedures performed with CT fluoroscopy array for the TOSHIBA AQUILION-MULTI TSX-101A scanner that allows a real-time 3 slices simultaneous representation of the target: middle target slice, superior and inferior slices. Thirty nine biopsies, 5 abscess drainage, 12 shoulder arthrocentesis previous to arthro-MR and 4 hepatic neoplasm ablations have been performed during the last 9 months. For each procedure questionnaires have been used to evaluate: target organs, scan parameters, fluoroscopy techniques (continuous or spot) and total time of fluoroCT. Basing on these data and on the measurements made on a body phantom we calculated patient's and operator's radiation dose rate. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The real-time simultaneous representation of the middle target slice and the adjacent superior and inferior slices has always allowed an immediate identification of the needle tip and direction. The use of a needle holder has been determined by the needle type, the fluoroscopy technique (continuous or spot), the type of interventional procedure and the target. In our experience freehand spot fluoroscopy approach was easier, faster and with less radiation dose rate. 24 seconds were the mean fluoroscopy time for all different CT fluoroscopy modalities and procedures. The mean absorbed equivalent dose rate to patient's skin was 5300 microSv/s while the dose to operator's body and hand was respectively 0.3 microSv/s and 30 microSv/s. CONCLUSIONS: Multislice CT fluoroscopy, specially if performed by spot technique, leads to an acceptable radiation dose rate to patient and operator, is user friendly and guides interventional procedures with rapidity.     

Removal of the Antiscatter Grid During Routine Biliary Interventional Procedures Performed in a Flat-Panel Interventional Suite: Preliminary Data on Image Quality and Patient Radiation Exposure

Purpose

To determine whether grid removal during routine biliary interventional procedures performed in a flat-panel interventional suite results in adequate image quality and a significant decrease of patient radiation exposure.

Materials and Methods

Routine biliary interventional procedures were defined as those in which absence of fine image detail during fluoroscopy carries no procedural impact, including substitution of internal–external biliary drains (n = 25) or bilioplasty of benign biliary anastomotic strictures (n = 5). All patients had undergone a previous procedure in which the grid was used. Constant object-to-detector and source-to-image distance were maintained in each patient during the grid/no-grid procedures. The same fluoroscopy protocol was used for all examinations. The dose area product (DAP [cGy.cm²]) and procedure fluoroscopy time (seconds) were recorded for each procedure. DAP was normalized per unit of fluoroscopy time (nDAP [cGy.cm²/s]).

Results

In all procedures, image quality was considered adequate by two different interventional radiologists, and all procedures were successfully completed without significant changes in fluoroscopy time between the two groups (p = 0.13). In every procedure without the grid, nDAP was inferior compared with nDAP in procedures performed using the grid. The mean decrease in dose was 39.2 ± 23.5 % (p = 0.000001).

Conclusion

Our preliminary data show that removal of the grid during routine biliary procedures is feasible and results in a significant decrease of patient radiation exposure. This seems of particular relevance because most of these patients require frequent reintervention. Larger studies with more procedures are warranted to confirm these data.     

心血管病介入操作时患者受照剂量研究

目的 对心血管介入手术中患者所受辐射剂量及与辐射剂量相关的指标进行采集和分析,为改善患者的辐射防护提供依据.方法 对在省属三级甲等医院进行的26例完整的心血管介入手术的患者进行临床数据采集,按手术类别分成冠状动脉血管造影术(CA)及行冠状动脉血管造影术(CA)后继续行经皮穿刺腔内冠状动脉成形术(PTCA)两组,采用TLD个人剂量计照射野矩阵测量法,检测患者荧光照射时间、入射皮肤剂量(ESD)、最高皮肤剂量(PSD)、剂量-面积乘积(DAP)等指标,用TLD测量在模拟心血管手术条件下体模器官剂量.结果 荧光透视时间为(17.7±15.6)min,范围为0.80～42.4 min;ESD范围为(159±138)mGy,4.40～459 mGy;PSD范围为(769±705)mGy,22.6～2.43×103mGy.CA+PTCA组的荧光照射时间、ESD、PSD均大于CA组,差异有统计学意义.最大皮肤受照剂量与透视时间有较好的相关性(r=0.84,P＜0.01).结论 心血管病放射性介入操作时,可通过透视时间来估算最大皮肤受照剂量.

Abstract：

Objective To collect and analyze the radiation dose to patients in cardiovascular interventional procedures and the radiation dose-related indicators,in order to provide a basis for improving radiation protection of patients.MethodsThe clinical data of 26 cases of complete cardiovascular interventional procedures was collected in the municipal Grade A Class Three hospitals,including coronary angiography (CA) and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA),and the patient-received radiation doses and other related factors was studied.TLD personal dosimeter radiation field matrix method was used to measure fluorescence time,the entrance skin dose (ESD),the peak skin dose (PSD),dosearea product (DAP) and other indicators.TLD was used to measure the organ dose of the phantom under the cardiovascular interventional procedure condition.ResultsThe fluoroscopy time was (17.7 ±15.6) min during the range of 0.80-42.4 min.The average entrance skin dose (ESD) was (159 ± 138)mGy during the range of 4.40-459 mGy.The peak skin dose (PSD) was (769 ± 705) mGy during the range of 22.6 - 2.43 × 103mGy.The fluorescence time,entrance skin dose (ESD) ,peak skin dose (PSD) of the group CA + PTCA are greater than the group CA and the difference has statistical significan.The peak skin dose and the fluoroscopy time have good linear correlation (r = 0.84,P ＜ 0.01 ).Conclusion The peak skin dose the patient received in cardiovascular interventional radiological operation can be estimated through the fluoroscopy time.     

Dynamic swallowing study and radiation dose to patients

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to define an optimal radiological procedure to evaluate the results of rehabilitation therapy for swallowing disorders and to calculate both the effective and organ dose to the patient to provide a measure of the radiation risk associated with the procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In order to define the optimal radiological procedure, kerma-area product (KAP) measurements and evaluations of image quality in fluoroscopy and fluorography mode were made using dedicated phantoms. Twenty-two patients were included in the study, and the values of KAP, screening time and average voltage selected were individually recorded. The recorded KAP values were used to estimate radiation risk with the use of dedicated calculation software. RESULTS: Median, first and third quartiles of the KAP distribution were, respectively, 2.1, 1.5 and 2.7 Gy cm2, with a corresponding effective dose of 0.35, 0.26 and 0.46 mSv. A good correlation between KAP and exposure time was also found (R2=0.85). Exposure of the thyroid, which is inside the radiation field, accounts for the greatest share to the effective dose, with a calculated median dose of 6 mGy. CONCLUSIONS: With the defined radiological procedure, the obtained KAP values are lower than recorded doses in interventional radiology, and the corresponding values of entrance skin dose are lower than the threshold dose for deterministic effects. Considering the effective dose at the median KAP value, the probability for stochastic effects is shown to be low, at approximately 1 in 39,000.     

PET/CT-guided Interventions: Personnel Radiation Dose

Purpose

To quantify radiation exposure to the primary operator and staff during PET/CT-guided interventional procedures.

Methods

In this prospective study, 12 patients underwent PET/CT-guided interventions over a 6 month period. Radiation exposure was measured for the primary operator, the radiology technologist, and the nurse anesthetist by means of optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters. Radiation exposure was correlated with the procedure time and the use of in-room image guidance (CT fluoroscopy or ultrasound).

Results

The median effective dose was 0.02 (range 0–0.13) mSv for the primary operator, 0.01 (range 0–0.05) mSv for the nurse anesthetist, and 0.02 (range 0–0.05) mSv for the radiology technologist. The median extremity dose equivalent for the operator was 0.05 (range 0–0.62) mSv. Radiation exposure correlated with procedure duration and with the use of in-room image guidance. The median operator effective dose for the procedure was 0.015 mSv when conventional biopsy mode CT was used, compared to 0.06 mSv for in-room image guidance, although this did not achieve statistical significance as a result of the small sample size (p = 0.06).

Conclusion

The operator dose from PET/CT-guided procedures is not significantly different than typical doses from fluoroscopically guided procedures. The major determinant of radiation exposure to the operator from PET/CT-guided interventional procedures is time spent in close proximity to the patient.     

Radiation exposure in stent-grafting of abdominal aortic aneurysms

In recent years, endovascular stent-grafting of abdominal aortic aneurysms has become more and more common. The radiation dose associated with these procedures is not well documented however. The aim of the present study was to estimate the radiation exposure and to simulate the effects of a switch from C-arm radiographic equipment to a dedicated angiographic suite. Dose-area product (DAP) was recorded for 24 aortic stent-grafting procedures. Based on these data, entrance surface dose (ESD) and effective dose were calculated. A simulation of doses at various settings was also performed using a humanoid Alderson phantom. The image quality was evaluated with a CDRAD contrast-detail phantom. The mean DAP was 72.3 Gy cm(2) at 28 min fluoroscopy time with a mean ESD of 0.39 Gy and a mean effective dose of 10.5 mSv. If the procedures had been performed in an angiographic suite, all dose values would be much higher with a mean ESD of 2.9 Gy with 16 patients exceeding 2 Gy, which is considered to be a threshold for possible skin injury. The image quality for fluoroscopy was superior for the C-arm whilst the angiographic unit gave better acquisition images. Using a C-arm unit resulted in doses similar to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). If the same patients had been treated using dedicated angiographic equipment, the risk of skin injury would be much higher. It is thus important to be aware of the dose output of the equipment that is used.     

Effect of the learning process on procedure times and radiation exposure for CT fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous biopsy procedures

PURPOSE: To assess if the learning process associated with computed tomography fluoroscopy (CTF) technology influences procedure and fluoroscopy times for percutaneous biopsy procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective analysis of the initial 250 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous biopsy with use of a CT scanner equipped with rapid image reconstruction and fluoroscopic capabilities in a 24-month period. All procedures were performed with both continuous and spot fluoroscopic technique, with typical radiation parameters of 50 mA, 120 kV, and a 10-mm-slice thickness. The procedures were all performed by a single experienced interventional radiologist to limit the variables of physician expertise, interventional materials used, and biopsy approach. The subject group was divided into five equal consecutive groups of 50 patients. In each subgroup, the authors recorded mean lesion size, success, and complication rates, as well as mean procedure and fluoroscopy times. RESULTS: The five subgroups were similar patient populations as documented by the absence of statistically significant differences when comparing mean lesion size, procedure success, and complication rates (P > .05; ANOVA test). A statistically significant decrease in mean fluoroscopy (groups 1-5: 50.26 vs 45.24 vs 33.86 vs 32.68 vs 25.8 sec/patient) and mean procedure times (groups 1-5: 30.08 vs 27.9 vs 26.34 vs 25.6 vs 21.6 min/patient) was recorded between the patient subgroups (P < .0001; ANOVA test). CONCLUSION: The learning process associated with CTF technology impacts procedure parameters by decreasing both mean procedure and fluoroscopy times, thereby increasing patient turnover and decreasing radiation exposure to the patient and the operator.     

Characteristic evaluation of a real-time silicon dosimeter and measurement of entrance surface dose at radiography

It is important to grasp how much radiation exposure has occurred through radiation diagnosis, in respect to patient explanations and radiation protection. In this examination, we used a patient skin dosimeter (PSD) that measures entrance surface dose (ESD) in real time using a fluoroscopy procedure. The PSD has the ability to display results beginning at 1 microGy. We focused our attention on the X-ray detectability of the PSD, and performed a representative evaluation with the X-ray equipment. We measured ESD under various radiographic parameters at our facility. Although the measurements were dependent on energy, we were able to measure ESD to within an accuracy of about a 5% error by putting a calibration value on energy. The PSD can measure ESD easily without requiring preparation. It is important to be aware of the exposure dose to the radiation staff, and the PSD is a very effective radiation dose-measuring tool when daily business is active.     

Effect of Real-Time Radiation Dose Feedback on Pediatric Interventional Radiology Staff Radiation Exposure

PurposeTo measure and compare individual staff radiation dose levels during interventional radiologic (IR) procedures with and without real-time feedback to evaluate whether it has any impact on staff radiation dose.Materials and MethodsA prospective trial was performed in which individuals filling five different staff roles wore radiation dosimeters during all IR procedures during two phases: a 12-week “closed” phase (measurements recorded but display was off, so no feedback was provided) and a 17-week “open” phase (display was on and provided real-time feedback). Radiation dose rates were recorded and compared by Mann–Whitney U test.ResultsThere was no significant difference in median procedure time, fluoroscopy time, or patient dose (dose–area product normalized to fluoroscopy time) between the two phases. Overall, the median staff dose was lower in the open phase (0.56 µSv/min of fluoroscopy time) than in the closed phase (3.01 µSv/min; P < .05). The IR attending physician dose decreased significantly for procedures for which the physicians were close to the patient, but not for ones for which they were far away.ConclusionsA radiation dose monitoring system that provides real-time feedback to the interventional staff can significantly reduce radiation exposure to the primary operator, most likely by increasing staff compliance with use of radiation protection equipment and dose reduction techniques.     

CT fluoroscopy shielding: decreases in scattered radiation for the patient and operator

PURPOSE: High-radiation exposure occurs during computed tomographic (CT) fluoroscopy. Patient and operator doses during thoracic and abdominal interventional procedures were studied in the present experiment, and a novel shielding device to reduce exposure to the patient and operator was evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: With a 16-slice CT scanner in CT fluoroscopy mode (120 kVp, 30 mA), surface dosimetry was performed on adult and pediatric phantoms. The shielding was composed of tungsten antimony in the form of a lightweight polymer sheet. Doses to the patient were measured with and without shielding for thoracic and abdominal procedures. Doses to the operator were recorded with and without phantom, gantry, and table shielding in place. Double-layer lead-free gloves were used by the operator during the procedures. RESULTS: Tungsten antimony shielding adjacent to the scan plane resulted in a maximum dose reduction of 92.3% to the patient. Maximum 85.6%, 93.3%, and 85.1% dose reductions were observed for the operator's torso, gonads, and hands, respectively. The use of double-layer lead-free gloves resulted in a maximum radiation dose reduction of 97%. CONCLUSIONS: Methods to reduce exposure during CT fluoroscopy are effective and should be searched for. Significant reduction in radiation doses to the patient and operator can be accomplished with tungsten antimony shielding.     

Influence of radiographic technique and equipment on absorbed ovarian dose associated with uterine artery embolization

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of pulsed fluoroscopy (PF), nonpulsed fluoroscopy (NPF), and various fluoroscopic techniques on the absorbed ovarian dose (AOD) associated with uterine artery embolization (UAE) of leiomyomata. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ovarian location was estimated from preprocedural pelvic magnetic resonance images of 23 patients previously treated by means of UAE. The AOD was measured with thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) placed into an anthropomorphic phantom at the determined ovarian location. The following measurements from PF and NPF were obtained: 21.89 minutes of nonmagnified posterior-anterior fluoroscopy, 10 minutes of nonmagnified oblique fluoroscopy, 10 minutes of posterior-anterior magnified fluoroscopy, 10 minutes of combined oblique magnified fluoroscopy, and 47 simulated angiographic exposures. Numbers for nonmagnified posterior-anterior fluoroscopy time and exposure numbers were chosen from the average values from previous UAE procedures. AOD from pulsed and nonpulsed nonmagnified posterior-anterior fluoroscopy was compared to measurements from oblique magnified, posterior-anterior magnified, and oblique fluoroscopy. RESULTS: AOD from NPF was, on average, 1.7 times higher than from PF. When compared with nonmagnified posterior-anterior fluoroscopy, the AOD from oblique magnified fluoroscopy was 1.9 times greater; the AOD from nonmagnified oblique fluoroscopy was 1.1 times greater. The AOD from oblique magnified fluoroscopy was 1.5 times higher on the side closer to the x-ray tube than on the contralateral side. AOD from serial angiographic exposures contributed only less than 7% to the total AOD for the average UAE procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The AOD associated with UAE can best be reduced by limiting fluoroscopy time and the use of oblique or magnified fluoroscopy. Contribution of angiographic exposures to AOD is much less significant.     

肝动脉化疗栓塞治疗肝癌患者的X射线辐射评价

目的　研究经肝动脉化疗栓塞 (THACE)治疗肝癌过程中 ,患者受到的X射线辐射 ,为THACE放射防护提供依据。方法　回顾性分析 82例HCC患者的辐射剂量资料 ,DSA机 (Angiostar Plus)配置穿透电离室型剂量监测系统 (DiamentorK1andDiamentorED) ,在线读取面积剂量乘积DAP(cGy cm2 )和入射表面剂量ESD(mGy) ,采用Monte Carlo转换因子估算有效剂量ED(mSv)。并分析近期 10例THACE患者 ,在提高基值管电压、减低透视脉冲频率和摄影帧数下对辐射剂量的影响。结果　 82例HCC患者透视时间 (35 3± 2 1 1)min ,摄影 (2 34± 10 8)帧 ,DAP为 (2 174 8± 12 4 2 4 )cGy cm2 ,ESD为 (96 4± 6 32 )mGy ,ED为 (34 8± 19 9)mSv。透视对总DAP的贡献 (2 4 0± 12 7) %小于摄影 (75 9± 12 7) % ,透视对ESD值的贡献 (4 9 8± 14 9) % ,与摄影相似 (5 1 6± 14 2 ) %。近期的 10例THACE患者的每分钟透视剂量、每帧摄影剂量及总剂量都比HCC患者明显降低。结论　在THACE过程中患者受到一次性较大剂量X射线照射。适度提高基值管电压、减低透视脉冲频率和缩减摄影帧数 ,可以有效降低患者的辐射剂量