The Response of Regular Re-entrant Supraventricular Tachycardia to Right Heart Stimulation

The study was designed to assess the effect of various forms of right atrial or ventricular stimulation on the termination of re-entrant "supraventricular" tachycardias. Standard electrophysiological techniques were used in 81 patients to study 86 stable tachycardias. All tachycardias were initiated by single or double atrial or ventricular premature stimuli or incremental atrial pacing. Eight groups of tachycardia circuit were defined in terms of the anterograde and retrograde pathways. Termination of each tachycardia was studied by atrial underdrive, ventricular underdrive, rapid atrial stimulation and single or double atrial and ventricular premature extrastimuli. Intranodal re-entrant tachycardias formed 33% of the total and WPW tachycardias as a whole formed 55% of the total number of arrhythmias. The remainder were comprised of atrial tachycardia (5%), tachycardias in association with a partial AV nodal bypass (3%) and pre-excited tachycardias (5%). A single atrial extrastimulus was most effective where the circuit involved the right atrium. Atrial underdrive was consistently less successful than a single atrial extrastimulus in all groups. Rapid atrial pacing was effective in all groups, but caused transient atrial flutter or fibrillation in a proportion of each group except one. Ventricular underdrive stimulation was most effective in those groups where the right ventricle was involved in the circuit, but tended to be less effective than programmed single or double ventricular extrastimuli. Pacemakers designed to deliver appropriately timed single or double extrastimuli may offer an important alternative to other pacing modalities.     

A Wide QRS Complex Tachycardia with Different Initiation Patterns: What is the Mechanism?

A 47-year-old man with palpitations underwent electrophysiologic testing (EPS). Burst atrial pacing while infusing isoproterenol induced non-reproducible wide QRS tachycardias with an unusual pattern of an H-A-V activation with the same tachycardia cycle length and two different initiation patterns. The tachycardia had the earliest atrial activation at the His bundle region. No dual atrioventricular (AV) nodal physiology was demonstrated by programmed atrial stimulation. Though a definite diagnosis of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia was not obtained, slow pathway ablation was performed in order to avoid inadvertent AV block as a complication. Thereafter, no tachycardias were induced by repeat burst atrial pacing.     

Recurrent Ventricular Tachycardia Responsive to Verapamil

We describe five young patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia in the absence of organic heart disease. In all patients tachycardia could be terminated or prevented with verapamil. Tachycardia in four patients was very similar, with a QRS pattern of right bundle branch block and left axis deviation. Electrophysiology studies in two patients showed that VT was inducible in one patient (rapid atrial or ventricular pacing, ventricular extrastimuli) but not in the other. The clinical and electrocardiographic similarities in these patients suggest that their ventricular tachycardias may share a common pathophysiology and may be dependent on slow channel activity.     

Coincident Idiopathic Left Ventricular Tachycardia and Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia: Control by Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of the Slow Atrioventricular Nodal Pathway

A healthy 37-year-old male presented with a history of frequent palpitations and sustained wide QRS complex tachycardia with a right bundle branch block and left axis morphology. Serial electrophysiological studies revealed two inducible tachycardias, which were shown to represent atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia and idiopathic left ventricular tachycardia. Transformation from one tachycardia to the other occurred spontaneously as well as following atrial or ventricular pacing. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of the slow atrioventricular nodal pathway resulted in cure of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia and the prevention of spontaneous recurrence of ventricular tachycardia, suggesting a role of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in triggering the clinical episodes of ventricular tachycardia. The patient has remained asymptomatic without antiarrhythmic therapy for 8 months.     

Use of Double Ventricular Extrastimulation to Determine the Preexcitation Index in Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

The ability of single paced ventricular beats during tachycardia to penetrate the tachycardia circuit and reset the subsequent atrial depolarization (atrial preexcitation), enabling calculation of the "preexcitation index," can be helpful in analyzing supraventricular tachycardias, However, the ventricular refractory period often prevents ventricular capture of beats with the necessary prematurity to demonstrate atrial preexcitation, particularly in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). We hypothesized that the use of double premature stimuli could overcome this limitation. In 25 consecutive patients with either AVNRT or atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT) we attempted to demonstrate atrial preexcitation with single and double ventricular extrastimuli. Whereas atrial preexcitation with a single extrastimulus could only be achieved in 3 of 11 patients with AVNRT, all but 1 patient demonstrated atrial preexcitation with the use of double ventricular extrastimuli. On the other hand, in all but 1 patient with AVRT, atrial preexcitation could be achieved with single and double extrastimuli. A formula was derived for obtaining a preexcitation index with double extrastimuli and shown to correspond closely with the preexcitation index obtained with a single extrastimulus in the 16 patients in whom atrial preexcitation could be achieved with single and double extrastimuli. Thus, this technique significantly enhances the ability to achieve atrial preexcitation and to calculate the preexcitation index in patients with AVNRT, and thus may be useful in deciphering tachycardia mechanism in some patients, as well as being a useful technique in studying the electrophysiological properties of the antegrade and retrograde limbs of AVNRT.     

Autodecremental Pacing—A Microprocessor Based Modality for the Termination of Paroxysmal Tachycardias

Autodecremental pacing—A microprocessor based modality for the termination of paroxysmal tachycardias. Five patients aged between 27 and 48 years were referred for investigation of recurrent paroxysmal tachycardias. EJectrophysiological studies revealed concealed ventriculoatrial accessory pathways in two patients, possible atrionodal pathways in two patients and dual intranodal pathways in one patient. During electrophysiologicol study, particular attention was paid to methods of terminating tachycardia by pacing techniques including single or double atrial and ventricular extrastimuli, atriaJ or ventricular underdrive, atriaJ overdrive pacing, and in two patients, rapid ventricular pacing. Autodecremental' atrial pacing was employed in all five patients and autodecremental ventricular pacing in two patients. This system is controlled by a microprocessor interfaced with a stimulator. When tachycardia of a cycle length less than 375 ms is sensed the system initiates pacing sequences. The initial stimulus is introduced at an interval less than the tachycardia cycle determined by a preset decremental value D. Each subsequent pacing interval is reduced by the value of D resulting in a gradual acceleration of pacing. The total duration of pacing is limited by the value of the pacing period (P). The final pacing rate is determined by P but cannot exceed 275 bpm (cycle length of 218 ms). Both P and D are operator programmable variables. Tachycardias of a cycle length less than 218 ms do not activate the pacemaker. The postpacing sensing deadtime of the system is set at 50 ms. In three patients, double atrial extrastimuli or atrial overdrive initiated atrial flutter or fibrillation. Autodecremental atrial pacing was successful in converting tachycardia to sinus rhythm in all five patients without initiation of other tachyarrhythmias. Autodecremental ventricular pacing was successful in one of the two patients in which it was used. This new modality of pacing has several theoretical advantages over conventional methods: the decremental mode may avoid stimulation in the vulnerable period and minimizes the rislt of initiating other tachyarrhythmias; gradual acceleration of pacing over a short period results in stimulation at different phases of the tachycardia cycle length; and the operator variables D and P provide a flexible system which may be adjusted to suit a particular patient and tachycardia. The development of a fully implantable programmable system is made attractive by the simplicity and adaptability of this technique.     

Electrophysiological Evaluation of Tachycardias Using Transesophageal Pacing and Recording

VOLKMANN, H., ET AL: Electrophysiological Evaluation of Tachycardias Using Transesophageal Pacing and Recording. Programmed electrical stimulation of the heart to initiate and terminate tachycardia has been useful in the evaluation of supraventricular and ventricular tachyarrhythmias. A wide use of these procedures, however, failed because of the expense of the invasive approach as well as the lack of physician experience in smaller hospitals. These disadvantages of the invasive proceeding can be abolished by transesophageal pacing. In our study, supraventricular tachycardias were initiated by programmed transesophageal atrial stimulation in 251 patients [AV node reentry in 75 patients, orthodromic AV reciprocating tachycardia using accessory pathway in 97 patients, antidromic AV reciprocating tachycardia in 11 patients, and atrial reentry in 39 patients). The stimulation protocol included one and two extrastimuli during sinus rhythm and after a pacing drive at different cycle lengths. The electrophysiological mechanism of tachycardias was determined by surface ECG, VA interval (esophageal lead), initiation mode at programmed transesophageal stimulation and by behavior of AV conduction and refractoriness. In 29 patients the mechanism of tachycardia was not clear. Invasive electraphysiological study was done in 219 of these 251 patients. In only nine patients, the supported mechanism of tachycardia was not confirmed by invasive investigation. In 11 patients, the etectrophysiological mechanism remained uncertain. In conclusion, the noninvasive transesophageal pacing is an appropriate method for evaluation of supraventricular tachycardia. It allows serial drug testing in a simple manner for finding an effective antiarrhythmic treatment.     

Differentiation of Sinus Tachycardia from Paroxysmal 1:1 Tachycardias Using Single Late Diastolic Atrial Extrastimuli

. Existing antitachycardia devices do not discriminate perfectly between sinus tachycardia and paroxysmal tachycardias with 1:1 atrioventricular relationship (paroxysmal 1:1 tachycardias). The present study tested the hypothesis that the nature of the ventricular response to atrial extrastimulation might distinguish between sinus tachycardia and selected paroxysmal 1:1 tachycardias. In 15 patients, atrial extrastimuli were delivered during sinus tachycardia and in 13 patients during various types of paroxysmal 1:1 tachycardia, and the timing of the next ventricular beat was measured. During sinus tachycardia, in 14 of 15 patients, atrial extrastimuli which were, in turn, early by 80 and 100 ms made the next ventricular beat premature by at least 30 and 50 ms, respectively. In all 13 patients, during paroxysmal 1:1 tachycardia, atrial extrastimuli that were early by 80 and 100 ms failed to make the next ventricular beat premature by more than 10 ms. Single atrial extrastimuli that were premature by less than or equal to 100 ms did not provoke faster tachycardias in any of the patients. In this study, a technique that used single late extrastimuli during tachycardia safely distinguished sinus tachycardia from paroxysmal tachycardias. This technique might be suitable for incorporation into an antitachycardia device. Further investigation of this technique is warranted in a larger number of patients with a wider variety of tachycardias.     

Radiofrequency ablation of a "concealed" Mahaim-type accessory pathway

We report a case of supraventricular tachycardia associated with left bundle branch block due to a slowly conducting right sided accessory pathway. Preexcitation of the ventricles could not be demonstrated during sinus rhythm or incremental atrial pacing but its presence was confirmed during antedromic tachycardia with critically timed atrial extrastimuli. The pathway was mapped during tachycardia and successfully ablated.     

Decremental ramp atrial extrastimuli pacing protocol for the induction of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia and other supraventricular tachycardias

AIM: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of decremental ramp atrial extrastimuli pacing protocol (PRTCL) for induction of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT), and other supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs), compared to standard (STD) methods. METHODS: The study cohort of 121 patients (age 57.51 +/- 14.02 years) who presented with documented SVTs and/or symptoms of palpitations and dizziness, and underwent invasive electrophysiological evaluation was divided into Group I (AVNRT, n = 42) and Group II (Control, n = 79). The PRTCL involved a train of six atrial extrastimuli, delivered in a decremental ramp fashion. The STD methods included continuous burst and rapid incremental pacing up to atrioventricular (AV) block cycle length, and single and occasionally double atrial extrastimuli. Prolongation in the Atrio-Hisian (Delta-AH) intervals achieved by both methods were compared, as were induction frequencies. RESULTS: In Group I, three categories of responses--(1) induction of AVNRT, (2) induction of echo beats only, and (3) none--were observed in 29 (69%), 11 (26%), and 2 (5%) patients with the PRTCL, when compared with 14 (33%), 16 (38%), and 12 (29%) patients with STD methods in the baseline state without the use of pharmacological agents. The Delta-AH intervals for each of these three categories were larger using PRTCL versus STD methods; 293.3 +/- 95.2 ms versus 192.9 +/- 61.4 ms (P < 0.005), 308.6 +/- 68.5 ms versus 189. 9 +/- 64.9 ms (P < 0.0005), and 203.0 +/- 86.3 ms versus 145.8 +/- 58.9 ms (P = NS), respectively. In Group II, in one patient with dual AV nodal physiology but no clinical tachycardia, the PRTCL induced nonsustained (12 beats) AVNRT. Additionally, in this group, both PRTCL and STD methods induced atrial tachycardia in two patients and orthodromic AV re-entrant tachycardia in one patient. CONCLUSION: Decremental ramp atrial extrastimuli pacing PRTCL demonstrates a superior response for induction of typical AVNRT as compared to STD techniques. Because of easy and reliable induction of AVNRT and echo beats by the PRTCL, we recommend it as a method to increase the likelihood of induction of AVNRT. For induction of other SVTs, the PRTCL and the STD methods are comparable.     

Relation between Spontaneous Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Vulnerability in Patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White Pattern

An intracavitary electrophysiological study was carried out on 103 patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW), 23 symptomatic patients had documented episodes of atrial fibrillation, 54 symptomatic patients had atrioventricular reentrant tachycardias, and 26 asymptomatic. Patients were examined for the relation between spontaneous atrial fibrillation and atrial vulnerability, defined as the possibility to induce sustained (greater than 1 minute) episodes of atrial fibrillation with a stimulation protocol excluding atrial bursts. Atrail fibrillation induction was attempted by single and double atrial extrastimuli during pacing at two different cycle lengths and incremental atrial pacing. Sustained atrail fibrillation was induced in 65% of the patients with spontaneous atrial fibrillation, and in 13% of the symptomatic patients with documented episodes of atrioventricular reentrant tachycardias and in 15% of the asymptomatic patients (P less than 0.0005). Atrial vulnerability was higher in patients with spontaneous atrial fibrillation than in patients without this arrhythmia. No significant difference was observed between symptomatic without atrial fibrillation and asymptomatic patients.     

Paroxysmal tachycardia in children and teenagers with normal sinus rhythm and without heart disease

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of esophageal programmed stimulation in children and teenagers with normal sinus rhythm ECG and normal noninvasive studies, having palpitations and syncope, and no documented tachycardias. Paroxysmal tachycardias are frequent in children and are often related to accessory connection. These tachycardias are sometimes difficult to prove. Transesophageal atrial pacing was performed at rest and during infusion of isoproterenol in 31 children or adolescents aged 9-19 years (16 +/- 3 years) with normal sinus rhythm ECG and suspected or documented episodes of paroxysmal tachycardia. Sustained tachycardia was induced in 27 patients, at rest in 13 patients, and after isoproterenol in 14 remaining patients. Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia was found as the main cause of paroxysmal tachycardia (22 cases). Six patients were followed by a vagal reaction and dizziness. These patients had spontaneous tachycardia with syncope. In three other patients, atrial fibrillation was also induced. Concealed accessory pathway reentrant tachycardia was identified in three patients. In two patients, a regular wide tachycardia with right bundle branch block morphology was induced; the diagnosis of verapamil-sensitive ventricular tachycardia was made in a second study by intracardiac study. In conclusion, atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia was found as the main cause of symptoms in children with normal sinus rhythm ECG. Syncope is frequently associated and provoked by a vagal reaction. This diagnosis could be underestimated in adolescents frequently considered as hysterical because noninvasive studies are negative.     

Atrial and His Bundle Stimulation with an Accessory Nodo-Ventricular Connection

A 39-year-old man with a history of frequent paroxysmal tachycardias for 27 years was referred for electrophysiology study. His resting electrocardiogram showed left bundle branch block, which persisted during paroxysmal tachycardia. Electrophysiology study demonstrated the presence of a right-sided accessory nodo-ventricular connection.¹ The case is of particular importance as it illustrates the diagnostic value of QRS normalization with left atrial pacing and the therapeutic use of rapid His bundle pacing to terminate the tachycardia.     

Adenosine-Sensitive Atrial Tachycardia

Limited data suggest that adenosine termination of atrial tachycardia is uncommon. To investigate further the effect of adenosine on atrial tachycardia, adenosine (6–12 mg) was administered during sustained atrial tachycardia in 17 patients. All patients underwent electrophysiological study to exclude other mechanisms of supraventricular tachycardia. Mean patient age was 51 ± 20 years (range 18–82 years). Seven patients had no structural heart disease. The mean atrial tachycardia cycle length was 390 ± 80 msecs (range 260–580). Sustained atrial tachycardia was induced with atrial extrastimuli in 8 patients, and was either incessant at baseline or developed spontaneously during isoproterenol infusion in 9 patients. Adenosine terminated atrial tachycardia in 3 patients (18%), transiently suppressed atrial tachycardia in 4 patients (23%), and produced AV block without affecting tachycardia cycle length in the remaining 10 patients. Adenosine sensitivity was observed in 3 of 8 patients with tachycardias initiated and terminated by atrial extrastimuli, and in 4 of 9 patients with spontaneous, but not inducible tachycardias including 3 of 4 patients with isoproterenol facilitated tachycardias. Of multiple clinical and electrophysiological variables examined as potential predictors of adenosine sensitivity, only isoproterenol facilitation of spontaneous or inducible sustained tachycardia predicted adenosine sensitivity (P = 0.02). These observations suggest that adenosine-sensitive atrial tachycardia may be more common than previously recognized. Adenosine sensitivity does not appear to be specific for tachycardia mechanism and cannot be predicted by response to pacing. Atrial tachycardias dependent on β-adrenergic stimulation are most likely to be terminated by adenosine.     

A Single Atrial Extrastimulus Can Distinguish Sinus Tachycardia from 1:1 Paroxysmal Tachycardia

We have developed a tachycardia detection scheme for use in an antitachycardia pacemaker in which the use of a properly timed atrial extrastimulus provides a means of discriminating sinus tachycardia from pace-terminable 1:1 tachycardias. An atrial extrastimulus is delivered in late diastole (80 ms premature), and the ventricular response is monitored. In sinus tachycardia, the ventricular response is expected to appear early as well, but in pace-terminable tachycardias, such as AV reentrant and ventricular with VA conduction, the ventricular rhythm will be unperturbed. Testing of the algorithm was performed in 34 patients. In 29 patients, atrial extrastimuli were delivered during sinus tachycardia, and in 22 patients during various types of 1:1 paroxysmal tachycardia. In one patient the procedure was completely automated, i.e., delivery of the atrial extrastimuli and diagnosis were microcomputer controlled. In 28/29 cases, the delivery of an atrial extrastimulus 80 to 120 ms early during sinus tachycardia elicited a ventricular response at least 28 ms early. In 22/22 patients with 1:1 paroxysmal tachycardia, atrial extrastimuli 80 to 120 ms early failed to produce a significant change in ventricular cycle length. This technique appears to be promising for prevention of inadvertent pacing of sinus tachycardia in an antitachycardia pacemaker.     

Electrophysiologic Demonstration of an Atriofascicular Accessory Pathway

Evidence of an atriofascicular accessory pathway has not been reported previously. In the patient presented in this case report, an electrophysiology study demonstrated a constant left bundle branch block QRS configuration despite varying degrees of ventricular preexcitation, in association with a constant artrioventricular interval during incremental atrial pacing and programmed atrial stimulation. The presence of an atrioventricular, nodoventricular, nodofascicular, and atrial-His accessory pathway was ruled out. The findings are best explained by the presence of an underlying left bundle branch block and an atriofascicular accessory pathway connecting the atrium and right bundle. The atriofascicular accessory pathway was a passive bystander during an atrial tachycardia and was not directly involved in the generation of the tachycardia. To our knowledge, this is the first report of an atriofascicular accessory pathway.     

An Unusual Mechanism of Initiation of Circus Movement Tachycardia in a Patient with Concealed Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome

Infranodal conduction delay is an uncommon mechanism of initiation of circus movement tachycardia in the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. A patient with a concealed left free wall atrioventricular accessory pathway who underwent electrophysiological study is presented. During alrial extrastimulus testing, a pattern ofalter-nating bundle branch block was observed and was most marked after the administration of intravenous procainamide. Conversion from right bundle branch block to left bundle branch block was reproducibly associated with the initiation of circus movement tachycardia utilizing the normal conducting system anfegradely and the accessory pathway retrogradely. Initiation of tachycardia was critically related to the increase in the HV interval associated with left bundle branch block. Of interest, conduction in the right bundle branch became progressively slower as the prematurity of the atrial extrastimulus increased, whereas conduction time through the left bundle branch remained fixed prior to block. Implications of these findings are discussed. To our knowledge, this is thefirst report of alternating bundle branch block during atrial extrastimulus testing as a mode of initiation of circus movement tachycardia in the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.     

Detection of Pathological Tachycardia by Analysis of Electrogram Morphology

Pacemaker recognition of pathological tachycardia relies on heart rate analysis. This can lead to misdiagnosis when sinus tachycardia exceeds the preset tachycardia response trigger rate. We have explored a method for automatic tachycardia diagnosis by analysis of bipolar endocardial electrogram morphology. Electrograms were recorded from 11 patients (pts) during sinus rhythm and during a total of 20 abnormal rhythms: retrograde atrial depolarization from ventricular pacing in six patients; atrioventricular reentry tachycardia in five patients with intermittent left bundle branch block in one of those; AV nodal reentry tachycardia in five patients and ventricular tachycardia in three patients. Posture and respiration were varied during all rhythms except ventricular tachycardia. The electrograms were then digitized and converted to a form in which the amplitudes were proportional to the rates of change of the original electrogram (equivalent to a first time derivative); the derived signal was then analyzed by a new gradient pattern detection (GPD) program. Analysis of the processed atrial signals by GPD resulted in automatic recognition of abnormal rhythms from sinus rhythm in all cases except for one patient's retrograde atrial depolarization. At the ventricular level, GPD successfully distinguished all abnormal rhythms from sinus rhythm including recognition of left bundle branch block and varying degrees of preexcitation. Respiratory and postural variation did not affect the recognition process. We conclude that electrogram GPD has successfully and automatically detected a variety of arrhythmias which can be treated by implantable pulse generators and may, therefore, be a useful adjunct to heart rate analysis in future generations of such antitachycardia pacemakers.     

Treatment of Ventricular and Supraventricular Tachyarrhythmias by Transcutaneous Cardiac Pacing

The efficacy of noninvasive transcutaneous cardiac pacing (TCP) in the treatment of tachyarrhythmic events was tested in 24 patient: 14 with ventricular tachycardia, seven with supraventricular tachycardia and three with atrial flutter. Six (42.9%) ventricular tachycardias were interrupted: in two of the ten patients on whom underdrive pacing was attempted and in all four cases in which overdrive stimulation was possible. Five of the six supraventricular tachycardias utilizing an atrioventricular bypass tract were interrupted, while the TCP was unsuccessful on the only patient with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. TCP failed to interrupt the arrhythmia in the three cases of atrial flutter. No clinically significant untoward effects (in particular tachycardia acceleration or ventricular fibrillation) were observed, except for a tolerable thumping sensation on the chest during pacing. In four patients, TCP effects on cardiac activation was evaluated by endocavitary recording: while the mean ventricular threshold was 70 mA, atrial capture was possible on only two patients at a current intensity of 140 and 150 mA. We consider our preliminary experience with TCP in the treatment of tachycardias encouraging. The technique was easily and rapidly usable and it was immediately successful in the majority of atrioventricular reentrant tachycardias and in a relevant percentage of ventricular tachycardias. In this latter setting TCP was mostly effective in the slower tachycardias where overdrive pacing was possible. A further experience with devices provided by higher pacing rates is warranted.     

Coexisting Idiopathic Left Ventricular Tachycardia and Atrioventricular Reentrant Tachycardia in a Patient with Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome

We report a patient with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome who presented with two distinct tachycardias that represented atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia utilizing left lateral accessory pathway (AP) and idiopathic left ventricular tachycardia (ILVT). Two tachycardias with a complete separate mechanism occurred spontaneously as well as following atrial or ventricular pacing. Successful ablation of the left AP and ILVT resulted in a cure of the double tachycardia.