Different clinical courses and predictors of atrial fibrillation occurrence after transisthmic ablation in patients with preablation lone atrial flutter, coexistent atrial fibrillation, and drug induced atrial flutter

The aim of this prospective study was to compare the long-term follow-up after transisthmic ablation of patients with preablation lone atrial flutter, coexistent AF, and drug induced atrial flutter to determine if postablation AF followed a different clinical course and displayed different predictors in these groups. The study evaluated 357 patients who underwent transisthmic ablation for typical atrial flutter. These were divided into four groups according to their preablation history. Group A included patients with typical atrial flutter and without preablation AF (n=120, 33.6%). Group B included patients with preablation AF and spontaneous atrial flutter (n=132, 37.0%). Group C patients had preablation AF and atrial flutter induced by treatment with IC drugs (propafenone or flecainide) (n=63, 17.6%) Group D included patients with preablation AF and atrial flutter induced by treatment with amiodarone (n=42, 11.8%). During a mean follow-up of 15.2 double dagger 10.6 months (range 6-55 months) AF occurred more frequently in groups B (56.1%) and C (57.1%) patients than in groups A (20.8%, P <0.0001) and D (31.0%, P <0.0001) patients. The results of multivariate analysis revealed that different clinical and echocardiographical variables were correlated with postablation AF occurrence in the different groups. Patients with atrial flutter induced by amiodarone have a significantly lower risk of postablation AF than patients with spontaneous atrial flutter and AF, and those with atrial flutter induced by IC drugs. Different clinical and echocardiographical variables predict postablation AF occurrence in different subgroups of patients.     

Mechanism of spontaneous transition from typical atrial flutter to atrial fibrillation: role of ectopic atrial fibrillation foci

Paroxysmal AF has been known to be initiated by ectopic beats, especially in the pulmonary veins (PVs), and radiofrequency catheter ablation could cure it. We considered that the spontaneous transition from typical atrial flutter to AF also could be initiated by ectopic beats. Twenty patients (18 men, mean age 66 +/- 14 years) with episodes of spontaneous transition from typical atrial flutter to AF were included in this study. They underwent detailed mapping of both atria. All the patients had spontaneous AF initiated by ectopic beats, and all of them had typical atrial flutter and spontaneous transition from typical atrial flutter (12 patients with counterclockwise atrial flutter and 8 patients with clockwise atrial flutter) to AF. The transition was initiated by ectopic beats from the PVs (17 foci, 85%), crista terminalis (2 foci, 10%), and superior vena cava (1 focus, 5%). After successful ablation of AF foci, typical atrial flutter was induced again, but no spontaneous transition was found after at least 10 minutes of observation. We concluded that paroxysmal AF and spontaneous transition from typical atrial flutter to AF were initiated by ectopic beats, and successful catheter ablation of the ectopic foci can eliminate paroxysmal AF and spontaneous transition from typical atrial flutter to AF.     

Shift of Atrial Reentrant Tachycardia with Transient Entrainment to an Uncommon and a Common Type of Atrial Flutter

Atrial reentrant tachycardia (ART) which demonstrated transient entrainment shifted to an uncommon type of atrial flutter (AF) with premature atrial stimulation, and then returned to ART spontaneously, Subsequently, this ART shifted to a common type of AF by rapid atrial pacing, which was further transformed into an uncommon type of AF and finally terminated by rapid atrial pacing. The mechanism of AF in clinical cases is still controversial, but in this case, AF, both uncommon and common types, is considered due to macro-reentry within the atria. To explain (he shift of ART to AF and mutual transformation between common and uncommon type of AF, we made a schematic figure of reentry loop within (he atria of ART and AF.     

Electrophysiologic characteristics of atria in patients without heart disease

BACKGROUND: The significance of atrial fibrillation or tachycardia (AF) induction remains debatable. Some believe that the presence of heart disease (HD) increases the sensitivity and decreases the specificity of programmed atrial stimulation (PAS). There are few data in patients without HD. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the results of PAS in asymptomatic patients without HD and in those with documented spontaneous AF, but without HD, to know the diagnosis value of the technique. METHODS: A total of 4,900 PAS were consecutively performed. The control group (I, N=67) was defined by the absence of preexcitation syndrome, dizziness/syncope, hypertension, history of tachycardia, or other documented HD together with a normal 2D echocardiogram and 24-hour Holter monitoring. They were compared to a group (II) of 54 patients with documented paroxysmal AF and without HD. PAS used one and two extrastimuli, delivered during sinus rhythm and two drive rates (600, 400 ms). Atrial-effective refractory periods (ARP), their adaptation to cycle length, and conduction times were noted. AF induction was defined as the induction of AF lasting more than 1 minute. RESULTS: Group I patients (1.4% of 4,900) were younger than group II (51 +/- 17 vs 65 +/- 11 years, P < 0.001). A single extrastimulus never induced sustained AF in group I, but did so in 11 group II patients (20%); sustained AF was induced by two extrastimuli in 15 group I patients (22%) and in 31 group II patients (57%) (P < 0.001). There were no ARP and conduction time differences in group I patients with and without inducible AF, but there was a longer sinus cycle length in patients with inducible AF (977 +/- 164 vs 838 +/- 141 ms, P < 0.02). There were no electrophysiological differences in group II patients with and without inducible AF. No group I patient developed spontaneous AF (follow-up 4 +/- 2 years). The sensitivity of PAS with one extrastimulus was 20% and the specificity 100%; the sensitivity of PAS with two extrastimuli was 57% and the specificity 78%. CONCLUSION: Sustained AF was not induced by one extrastimulus in control patients without symptoms, nor heart disease, but sustained AF was induced by two extrastimuli in 22% of these patients. The induction of a sustained AF by two extrastimuli should be interpreted cautiously, particularly in patients with a relative sinus bradycardia. However, the sensitivity of PAS with one extrastimulus was very low and two extrastimuli were required in patients with spontaneous AF to induce the tachycardia. Other electrophysiological parameters were not useful to differentiate patients with and without inducible AF.     

Spontaneous Reinitiation of Atrial Fibrillation Following Transvenous Atrial Defibrillation

Spontaneous reinitiation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been systematically looked at in patients undergoing transvenous AF. This study involved 11 patients, the mean age 60 ± 8 years. 3 male and 8 female, in whom transvenous atrial defibrillation successfully converted AF to sinus rhythm. Eight patients had paroxysmal AF and three patients had chronic persistent AF for 4 weeks or more. Four patients were taking antiarrhythmic medications at the time of testing. Multipolar transvenous catheters were positioned inside the coronary sinus, right atrium, and the right ventricle. Atrial defibrillation testing was performed using the METRIX atrial defibrillation system in nine patients and the Ventritex HVSO2 in the remaining two patients. A total of 64 therapeutic shocks (range 3–11) were delivered in the 11 patients, and 31 of these successfully converted AF to sinus rhythm. In four patients spontaneous AF was reinitiated following 12 successful transvenous atrial defibrillation episodes. The mean time to reinitiation of AF following shock delivery and restoration of sinus rhythm was 8.26 ± 5.25 seconds, range 1.8–19.9 seconds. All 12 episodes of spontaneous AF were preceded by a spontaneous premature atrial complex. The coupling interval of the premature atrial complexes was 443 ± 43 ms, range 390–510 ms. None of the patients taking antiarrhythmic medications or those demonstrating no premature atrial complexes had spontaneous reinitiation of AF. In conclusion, spontaneous reinitiation of AF can occur in a significant proportion of patients with AE undergoing transvenous atrial defibrillation. This phenomenon is preceded by the occurrence of atrial premature complex. Findings of this study may have significant clinical implications.(PACE 1998; 21:1105–1110)     

Long-Term Results of Hybrid Therapy in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Who Develop Atrial Flutter During Flecainide Infusion

The flecainide infusion test has been proposed to screen candidates for hybrid pharmacological and ablation therapy. We report the long-term follow-up of 154 consecutive patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) who developed atrial flutter (AFL) during flecainide infusion (IC AFL), treated with inferior vena cava-tricuspid annulus isthmus catheter ablation and oral flecainide (hybrid therapy). Over a mean of 54.1 ± 13.1 months 82 patients (53%) remained free of AF and AFL. Flecainide was discontinued because of adverse effects in 6 patients (4%). A history of persistent AF, and the documentation of ≥1 spontaneous AFL episode before the flecainide test were independent predictors of successful hybrid therapy. In patients with paroxysmal AF without documented spontaneous AFL, the long-term efficacy of hybrid therapy was 38.5% (P = 0.03). The flecainide infusion test reliably detects candidates for hybrid therapy. The efficacy of this therapy is maintained over the long-term with a high patient compliance.     

Atrial Vulnerability and Electrophysiology Determined in Patients With and Without Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

For elucidation of atrial electrophysiology and vulnerability an electrophysiological study was performed in 45 patients with documented paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and a control group (n = 46). Atrial vulnerability was assessed by programmed atrial stimulation with up to two extrastimuli during sinus rhythm and paced cycle lengths of 600 msec, 430 msec and 330 msec. Sustained atrial fibrillation or flutter was induced in 37/45 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in contrast to 9/46 patients in the control group (P less than 0.001). Left atrial diameter (M-mode echocardiogram), P wave duration, sinus cycle length, sinus node recovery time, and the effective refractory period of the right atrium were not significantly different between the two study groups. Intraatrial conduction time from the high right atrium (HRA) to the basal right atrium (A) and the functional refractory period of the right atrium were significantly longer in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.     

Termination of Spontaneous Atrial Flutter by Transesophageal Pacing

Transesophageal atrial pacing using the constant-rate technique was performed in 26 patients presenting with spontaneous atrial flutter (atrial cycle length between 180 and 270 ms). All but one patient had been treated with one or more antiarrhythmic agents (digoxin, quinidine, procainamide, propranolol, verapamil, diltiazem, and propafenone) within the previous 12 hours. Transesophageal atrial pacing at cycle lengths between 80 and 180 ms was successful in terminating atrial flutter in 22 patients: immediate reversion to sinus rhythm in 16, following transient sinus pause in one, following a brief period of atrial fibrillation in three, and following longer periods of atrial fibrillation in another two. No post-conversion ventricular arrhythmia and no other complications were observed. All patients experienced only a mild burning discomfort during the procedure. It is concluded that atrial pacing via the esophagus is a safe and noninvasive technique of terminating spontaneous atrial flutter. The effectiveness of this technique is comparable to endocardial or epicardial atrial pacing.     

Electrical Atrial Remodeling Assessed by Monophasic Action Potential and Atrial Refractoriness in Patients with Structural Heart Disease

The present study was performed to assess the effect of induced atrial fibrillation (AF) on atrial monophasic action potentials (MAPs) and atrial refractory period (ERP) in patients with structural heart disease. An electrode MAP catheter was placed in the right atrium to continuously measure atrial potential duration (APD₉₀) in 13 patients (coronary artery disease, 10 patients; dilated cardiomyopathy, 2 patients; hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, 1 patient) without spontaneous AF episodes. AF was induced by rapid atrial stimulation (300–1500/min). If sinus rhythm returned within 10 minutes, AF was reinduced. The atrial ERP was measured during atrial pacing at a basic cycle length of 550 ms before AF induction and after its conversion. Results: The mean atrial ERP and the atrial APD₉₀ before AF was 242 ± 34 ms and 256 ± 23 ms, respectively. ERP and APD_go shortening was observed after 3 minutes of AF. After 11 ± 0.5 min (10 min 20 s-13 min 10 s) of AF, ERP and APD₉₀ reached their minimal values of 72%± 13% and 71%± 10% of baseline, respectively. ERP and APD₉₀ returned to their initial values within 10 minutes after conversion of AF. A tendency toward longer duration of consecutive AF episodes and facilitation of their induction was observed. Conclusion: The present study confirms that short episodes of AF modify the electrophysiological properties of the atria in humans. In patients with structural heart disease, induced atrial fibrillation shortens the atrial ERP as well as the atrial APD₉₀. The changes were reversible within 10 minutes after arrhythmia termination.     

Relation Between Cycle Length, Volume, and Pressure in Type I Atrial Flutter

Assuming that type I atrial flutter is a macroreentrant circuit, its cycle length should vary with the atrial dimensions. In order to test this hypothesis, flutter cycle length was measured while inducing atrial volume and pressure changes by postural and pharmacological means in seven patients undergoing a therapeutic programmed stimulation for type 1 atrial flutter conversion. Right atrial volume was estimated from B-mode echocardiography data. Basal values were compared with those obtained during inspiration, expiration, Valsalva maneuver, negative tilt (head down), and positive tilt (head up) with 0.8–1.6 mg p.o. nitroglycerin. The right atrial size increased slightly from 17.8 to 18.3 cm² (P = 0.04) during the pressure load induced by negative tilt (+ 3 mmHg), with a corresponding lengthening of the flutter cycle length from 228 to 233 msec (P = 0.02). Similarly, pressure unloading of -2 mmHg by positive tilting and nitrates was accompanied by a decrease in right atrial size to 16.6 cm² (P = 0.04), with a corresponding decrease in cycle length from 228 to 219 msec (P = 0.03). Respiratory maneuver yielded similar results with an inspiratory cycle lengthening, expiratory shortening, and further shortening during Valsalva maneuver. These experiments demonstrate a direct relation between cycle length and atrial volume in human type I atrial flutter. They underline the importance of the right heart preload and atrial size for the electrophysiological characteristics of type I atrial flutter. Beside its fundamental interest, this finding is important for the understanding of the mechanism of maintenance and therapeutic responses of this common arrhythmia.     

Atrial and Ventricular Vulnerability in a Patient with the Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome

An electrophysiologic study was carried out in a patient with the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome and a history of spontaneous atrial fibrillation but with no evidence of organic cardiac disease. A single induced premature ventricular depolarization resulted in ventricular tachycardia followed by ventricular fibrillation. Similarly, atrial pacing or premature atrial stimulation resulted in frequent episodes of atrial fibrillation or flutter, The atrial and ventricular effective refractory periods were 180 ms and < 160 ms, respectively, at a driven cycle length of 480 ms. Intravenous administration of procainamide resulted in lengthening of the refractory periods and failure to induce either atriaJ or ventricular arrhythmias with pacing. In most patients with enhanced atrioventricular nodal or accessory atrioventricular nodal bypass, the mechanism of ventricular tachycardia is related to an inordinately rapid ventricular response during supraventricular arrhythmias. In our patient, a unique mechanism was apparent: atrial and ventricular vulnerability to fibrillation was associated with extremely short myocardial effective refractory periods. The relationship of this finding to sudden cardiac death bears further study.     

Prospective evaluation of catheter ablation in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators and multiple inappropriate ICD therapies due to atrial fibrillation and type I atrial flutter

The high incidence of inappropriate therapies due to drug refractory supraventricular tachycardia remains a major unsolved problem of the ICD. Most of the inappropriate therapies for supraventricular tachycardia are caused by AF and type I atrial flutter with rapid ventricular response. The purpose of this prospective study was to determine the usefulness of AVN modulation or ablation for rapid AF and ablation of the tricuspid annulus-inferior vena cava (TA-IVC) isthmus for type I atrial flutter in ICD patients with frequent inappropriate ICD interventions. Eighteen consecutive patients were enrolled in this study. Twelve patients received a mean of 34 +/- 36 antitachycardia pacing (ATP) and 41 +/- 32 shock therapies for rapid AF during 49 +/- 39 months, and 6 patients a mean of 111 +/- 200 ATP and 11 +/- 8 shock therapies for type I atrial flutter during 52 +/- 37 months preceding ablation procedure. Modification of the AVN was successful in 10 (83%) of 12 AF patients, in 2 (17%) patients ablation of the AVN was performed. A complete TA-IVC isthmus block was achieved in 5 (83%) of 6 atrial flutter patients. Three (25%) AF patients had 11 +/- 24 recurrences of ATP and 0.4 +/- 1.1 shock therapies for rapid AF during 15 +/- 7 months. None of the atrial flutter patients had recurrences of inappropriate therapies for type I atrial flutter during 14 +/- 8 months, but two (33%) patients had inappropriate ICD therapies for type II atrial flutter or rapid AF. There was an overall mean incidence of 18 +/- 22 inappropriate ICD therapies per 6 months before and 4 +/- 9 per 6 months after the ablation procedure (P < 0.05). In conclusion, radiofrequency catheter modification or ablation of the AVN for rapid AF and ablation for atrial flutter type I are demonstrated to be highly effective in the majority of ICD patients with drug refractory multiple inappropriate ICD therapies.     

Atrial Lead Implantation During Atrial Flutter or Fibrillation?

In patients with sinoatrial disease, unexpected atrial flutter (Af) or fibrillation (AF) is a common problem during implantation of atrial-based pacing systems. As an alternative approach to blind atrial lead placement, lead positioning could be optimized by atrial electrogram mapping. It was the object of this study to evaluate if atrial lead implantation according to this approach and during ongoing arrhythmia is reasonable or if it should be postponed until restoration of sinus rhythm (SR). Twenty-nine consecutive patients (group I) with sick sinus syndrome received a dual-chamber pacemaker during an episode of Af (n = 11) or AF (n = 18). All but two atrial leads were of the screw-in type and had bipolar sensing. Atrial lead position was optimized by mapping the electrogram under fluoroscopy to find locations with high potential amplitudes. The patients were followed for 15.1 ± 9.8 months, and atrial sensing threshold (AST), atrial pulse width threshold (PWT) at 2.0 V, the pacing mode programmed, and the clinical outcome (OUT) were recorded. The control group consisted of 30 patients (group II) who equally had a history of AF or Af, but were in SR during implantation. The atrial peak-to-peak potential (APEAK) after final lead placement was lower for AF (median value 2.5 mV, lower-upper quartile: 1.7–3.1 mV) as compared to Af (3.8 mV, 2.7–4.9 mV, P < 0.05) and SR (4.1 mV, 3.3–6.2 mV, P < 0.001). There was a correlation (P < 0.01) between APEAK during Af/AF and the postoperative AST immediately after restoration of SR. No lead in any group had to be corrected due to improper sensing in the postoperative course. Median chronic AST was 2.8 mV (2.0–4.0 mV) in group I and 4.0 mV (2.8–4.0 mV) in group II. Median chronic PWT at 2.0 V was 0.15 ms (0.12–0.26 ms) in group I and 0.15 ms (0.09–0.20 ms) in group II. There was no significant difference in chronic AST and PWT between both groups. All but two patients in group I preserved SR as the basic rhythm. A stable SR was observed in 10 of 29 patients, intermittent Af/AF was documented in 17 of 29 patients, seven of whom were asymptomatic. There was no significant difference in OUT between group I and II. Hence, sinus rhythm is not a prerequisite of atrial lead implantation. Mapping the Af or AF waves appears to be useful to guide lead placement and to achieve sufficient sensing and pacing conditions after conversion to sinus rhythm.     

Combined Transesophageal Left Atrial Pacing and Antiarrhythmic Therapy in the Treatment of Atrial Flutter

In order to terminate atrial flutter (AF) overdrive transesophageal left atrial pacing (TELAP) was performed in 760 patients with paroxysmal AF. There were 315 women and 415 men (mean age 59 years). In 260 patients, TELAP was used in an outpatient setting. Approximately half of the patients (51 %) had coronary artery disease and/or arterial hypertension, and 23% of the patients had no structural heart disease. The duration of AF ranged between 1 hour and 1 month. TELAP was performed in 312 patients without any antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) administration (group I) and in 448 patients after administration of AAD (procainamide and/or amiodarone) in conventional doses (group II). TELAP resulted in immediate return of sinus rhythm in 85 patients (27%) of group I and in 222 patients (50%) of group II (P < 0.001). TELAP converted AF to atrial fibrillation (AFIB) in 185 of group I and in 214 (48%) of the group II patients (P < 0.01). In addition, within 1–2 days after TELAP AFIB converted to sinus rhythm spontaneously or after AAD in 87 patients of group I (28%) and in 84 (19%)of the group II patients (P < 0.01). In general, sinus rhythm was restored in 172 (55%) of the group I and in 306 (68%) of the group II patients (P < 0.005). AF was converted to AFIB in 98 (31 %) of the group I and in 130 (29%) of the patients in group II patients (NS). TELAP was ineffective in 42 (13.5%) of the group I and in 12 (3%) of the group II patients (P < 0.001). TELAP was an effective noninvasive method for the treatment of recent onset AF. Our experience showed that after TELAP, sinus rhythm was restored in most of the patients with paroxysmal AF within 1–2 days. In some patients TELAP converted AF to AFIB, making it easier to control the heart rate with AAD. Treatment with AAD before TELAP increased its effectiveness.     

Induced Concealed Dissimilar Atrial Rhythms

Electrophysiologic studies, including intra-atrial recordings and atrial stimulation, were performed in two patients with suspected sick sinus syndrome. Premature atrial stimuli induced atrial flutter in both patients. The arrhythmia was concealed, i.e., it was recordable only by intracavitary electrogram and invisible on surface electrocardiogram. In one case, simultaneous atrial fibrillation could be recorded in a segment of the right atrium. In this patient, the rhythm on the surface electrocardiogram changed during the study to "upper nodal" rhythm, though the atrial electrogram showed continuation of A waves at the same rate as before during sinus rhythm. It seems that atrial changes, which are frequently encountered in sick sinus syndrome, are a predisposing factor for spontaneous or inducible concealed atrial arrhythmias.     

Atrial Electrophysiological Features in Patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White and Atrial Fibrillation: Absence of Rate Adaptation of Intraatrial Conduction Time Parameters

Clinical electrophysiology has not yet clearly defined atrial features that can predict spontaneous occurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this work was to identify atrial electrophysiological features that can distinguish Wolff-Parkinson-White patients with spontaneous AF from those without this arrhythmia. Sixty-nine patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White were divided into three groups: group I (16 patients) with spontaneous AF; group II (35 patients) with reciprocating tachycardia but not AF; and group III (18 patients) asymptomatic without documented arrhythmias. Atrial effective refractory periods (ERPs) and intraatrial conduction times in response to premature extrastimuli were analyzed. The latter were evaluated as the A₁A₂ interval minus the correspondent S₁S₂ interval (A₁A₂-S₁S₂), S₂A₂ and the interval A₁A₂ following the shortest S₁S₂ producing atrial activation (FRP'). All the parameters have been evaluated in two atrial sites and at two atrial pacing cycle lengths (600 and 400 ms). For all the parameters, the difference (“gradient”) was calculated between the values of the same parameter measured at the atrial pacing cycle length of 600 ms and that found at the atrial pacing cycle length of 400 ms in the same recording site in each patient was calculated. Atrial FRP did not differ significantly in the three groups. Intraatrial conduction parameters, evaluated in the high right atrium (HRA), were longer when measured at an atrial pacing of 400 ms and showed a lack of rate adaptation in patients with spontaneous AF. In group I patients in particular, FRP’became longer with the increase of atrial rate, while in groups 2 and 3, it usually shortened. The mean gradient of HRA FRP’was -15.0 ± 19 ms in group I as compared to 5.7 ±13 ms in group II and 6.4± 13 ms in group III (P < 0.001); sensitivity. specificity, and negative predictive value of a negative gradient in the identification of patients with spontaneous AF, were, respectively, 83%, 75%, and 93%. Patients from groups 2 and 3 did not differ in any of the analyzed parameters. Patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White and spontaneous AF showed prolonged intraatrial conduction times and a different behavior in response to modification of heart rate. (PACE 1997;20[Pt. I]:1318-1327)     

Atrial Flutter Ablation using a Technique for Detection of Conduction Block within the Posterior Isthmus

Catheter ablation orientated on the induction of a functional intraatrial block within the posterior isthmus of the tricuspid annulus has been shown to effectively abolish atrial flutter. In order to improve and simplify the current technique, a strategy based on an electrode catheter for combined right atrial and coronary sinus mapping and stimulation was explored prospectively. Twenty-four consecutive patients referred for catheter ablation of recurrent type I atrial flutter were included. A steerable 7 Fr catheter (Medtronic/Cardiorhythm) composed of two segments with 20 electrodes was used for right atrial and coronary sinus activation mapping and stimulation. Multiple steering mechanisms allowing intubation and positioning of the distal part within the coronary sinus were incorporated into the device. Adequate positioning of the mapping catheter was achieved solely via a transfemoral approach in all patients after 7.7 +/- 4.6 minutes, providing stable electrogram recordings during the entire ablation procedure. Radiofrequency current ablation (16.3 +/- 9.6 pulses) caused a significant bidirectional increase of the mean intraatrial conduction times via the posterior isthmus irrespective to the stimulation interval. Significant changes of intraatrial conduction properties were induced during ablation in 22 of 24 patients (bidirectional block: n = 18, unidirectional block: n = 3, conduction delay: n = 1, unchanged conduction: n = 2). Following ablation atrial flutter was noninducible in all patients. Twenty-two of 24 patients (92%) remained free of atrial flutter episodes during a follow-up of 12.5 +/- 5.7 months. Two of six patients without a bidirectional conduction block had a recurrence of atrial flutter. Atrial flutter ablation guided by the induction of an intraatrial conduction block can be effectively performed with this novel strategy for combined mapping of the posterior tricuspid isthmus, including coronary sinus and right atrial free wall. This transfemoral approach has a high accuracy with respect to the detection of radiofrequency current-induced changes of intraatrial conduction patterns.     

Studies on the Prevalence of Complicated Atrial Arrhythmias, Flutter, and Fibrillation in Patients with Reciprocating Supraventricular Tachycardia Before and After Successful Catheter Ablation

Atrial flutter and AF are complications in approximately 30% of cases of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT)-indicated catheter ablation, and it is of interest to determine if therapeutic modification for PSVT would eliminate combined atrial tachyarrhythmia like atrial flutter and AF. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and the risk of atrial tachyarrhythmias after catheter ablation of PSVT. A total of 152 patients (age range 12-74, mean 41 +/- 17 years) with accessory pathway (n = 106) and/or dual atrioventricular nodal conduction (n = 46) were enrolled in a 2-year follow-up program after successful catheter ablation. Possible risks on clinical background (age, sex, PSVT duration, hemodynamic instability during attacks), premature atrial contraction (PACs) on Holter monitoring, echocardiographic left atrial size, and electrophysiological property (insertion site, conduction type, effective refractory period) were evaluated. Atrial flutter and AF were complications in 53 (35%) of the subjects, who were elderly and had a longer PSVT history with a larger left atrial dimension and frequent PACs; however, the electrophysiological properties were similar. After a 2-year follow-up period 36 (24%) of the patients still exhibited PAC runs, including 13 (9%) with atrial flutter and AF, each one of whom were complicated with nonlethal cerebral thromboembolism and congestive heart failure. Multiplelogistic-regression analysis revealed that advanced age (> or = 41 years, P = 0.0152) and frequent PACs (> or = 1% of total daily QRS counts, P = 0.0426) on Holter monitoring are the risk factors of PAC runs and/or atrial flutter and AF. In conclusion, successful ablation for PSVT is thought to be beneficial for preventing atrial flutter and AF. However, careful follow-up to monitor for the recurrence and atrial flutter and AF related complications, especially in patients of solitary atrial flutter and AF without reciprocating tachycardia and with frequent PAC.     

Reproducibility of response to programmed atrial stimulation

The induction of atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATAs) is used to guide the medical or ablative treatment of these tachycardias. To date no information is available regarding the reproducibility of programmed atrial stimulation (PAS) induced ATA. The purpose of the study was to look for the reproducibility of PAS. Two baseline electrophysiological tests were performed in the drug-free state and within 6 months to 3 years of one another (mean 18 months) in 62 patients. Twenty-six patients had spontaneous documented ATAs (group I); 36 patients did not have spontaneous ATAs (group II). PAS used one and two extrastimuli delivered during three cycle lengths (sinus rhythm, 600 ms, 400 ms). The results were as follows. In group I, sustained (> 1 minute) ATA was induced in 23 patients on the first PAS and remained inducible in 22 patients in the second study. In three patients with noninducible ATA, PAS remained negative in only one; the reproducibility of PAS was 88%. In 17 (47%) group II patients, a sustained ATA was induced in the first study, and the ATA remained inducible in 10 patients in the second study. Nineteen other patients did not have inducible ATA on the first study, but 10 of them had an inducible ATA on the second PAS; the reproducibility of PAS was 53%. In conclusion, long-term reproducibility of PAS induced ATA in patients with spontaneous and documented ATA was good. In patients without spontaneous ATA, the reproducibility of PAS induced ATA was low and the induction of ATA in these patients should be interpreted cautiously in light of this observed variability in induced atrial arrhythmias.     

Assessment of Intersignal Variability for Discrimination of Atrial Fibrillation from Atrial Flutter

The analysis of endocardial signals obtained from an electrode located in the right atrium enabled by new dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators may be helpful to provide additional therapies such as overdrive pacing or low energy atrial cardioversion for the treatment of concomitant atrial flutter (AFL) or atrial fibrillation (AF). Algorithms for discrimination of atrial tachyarrhythmias based on rate counting are of limited efficacy. The aim of this study was to assess the intersignal variability by using fast discrete wavelet transforms (FDWT) as a new method of discrimination of AF from AFL. Patients with spontaneous episodes of AF/AFL or patients who developed AF/AFL during an electrophysiological study were studied. The endocardial signals were recorded from the high right atrium using a transvenous 5 Fr bipolar electrode catheter (interelectrode spacing: 1 cm). The signals were digitized (2 kHz, 12-bit resolution) after amplification and filtering (40–500 Hz). Within data segments of 10-second duration, 25 consecutive signals were selected and normalized and FDWT was applied. Standard deviations of the wavelet coefficients (SD) from coarse scales (scale 4–8) were calculated. A total of 94 data segments (AF: 52, AFL: 42) from 28 patients were analyzed. SD at each considered scale was higher for AF than for AFL (P < 0.001). SD at scale 8 discriminated between AF from AFL with 100% sensitivity and specificity. We conclude that assessment of intersignal variability of bipolar endocardial recordings using FDWT is an effective method for the discrimination of AF from AFL. The implementation of this tool in a discrimination algorithm of an implantable device may help provide the appropriate differential therapy for atrial tachyarrhythmias.