肾下型腹主动脉瘤的外科治疗

目的总结26例肾下型腹主动脉瘤的手术治疗经验。方法回顾性分析近5年多来手术治疗26例肾下型腹主动脉瘤的临床资料，全组26例，术前均经影像检查证实诊断。行择期手术21例，破裂型腹主动脉瘤急诊手术5例。26例均行腹主动脉瘤切除，人工血管重建术。结果围手术期死亡2例，均为急症手术患者，总病死率7．7％，急诊手术病死率40．0％。随访时间1-5年。术后1，3，5年生存率分别为96％，88％，75％。死亡原因均与腹主动脉瘤和手术无关。结论CTA检查是诊断腹主动脉瘤的可靠方法。手术治疗仍是治疗腹主动脉瘤的重要方法。瘤体直径不是决定手术的唯一指征。影响手术的危险因素主要是高龄、严重的心肺疾病和肾功能不全。     

Aneurysmal change at or above the proximal anastomosis after infrarenal aortic grafting.

We conducted a retrospective review of all patients undergoing repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm at or above the proximal anastomosis of a previous infrarenal aortic graft between 1986 and 1991. Infected grafts and patients with suprarenal aneurysms present at the time of the original graft were excluded. Twenty-one patients, 19 men and two women, were included. The original indication for surgery was aneurysm in 14 patients and occlusive disease in seven; the mean interval from initial surgery to presentation was 10 years (range, 3 to 23 years). Twelve lesions were anastomotic false aneurysms, and nine were true aneurysms beginning in the proximal juxta-anastomotic aorta. Fourteen patients had an asymptomatic abdominal mass. Seven patients had symptoms of acute expansion (three), rupture (three), or thrombosis (one). True aneurysm and symptomatic presentation were correlated with aneurysm as the original indication for surgery. Repair was accomplished by an interpositional graft in 13 and graft replacement in eight. Seven patients required suprarenal anastomosis or renal and visceral reconstruction. Five operative deaths (24%) occurred, including two of three patients with rupture (67%) and two of seven patients (28%) in the suprarenal group. The mortality rate for elective repair with an infrarenal anastomosis was 11%. Two additional late deaths occurred during the follow-up period.     

Juxta-anastomotic aneurysm in the residual infrarenal abdominal aorta.

A 72-year-old man, who had undergone an emergency operation with a tube graft for a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm 9 years previously presented with a recurrent true abdominal aortic aneurysm near the proximal anastomotic site. True aneurysmal formation in the juxta-anastomotic aorta proximal to the prosthetic graft as seen in this case is very rare. Since recurrent aortic aneurysms impose significant problems of diagnosis and management, procedures to prevent the recurrence of aneurysms are important in the initial operation.     

Simultaneous endovascular exclusion of thoracic aortic aneurysm with open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of aneurysms at multiple sites within the aorta is problematic. METHODS: Between March 2002 and June 2003 in the Department of General, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw six patients with coexisting abdominal and descending thoracic aortic aneurysms underwent simultaneous open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair and endoluminal thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) repair. The indication for a combined procedure was a diagnosed descending TAA and AAA with no significant risk factors for open aortic surgery or technical contraindications for endovascular treatment of TAA. RESULTS: One patient died in the peri-operative period while the other five patients all recovered well after surgery and were discharged with both aneurysms excluded. CONCLUSION: Endovascular treatment of TAA combined with a simultaneous open AAA repair is an efficient and relatively safe treatment modality in patients with TAA and AAA disqualified from endovascular repair. The fact that thoracotomy is not a necessity significantly lowers the complication rate in these patients.     

Extraperitoneal aortic bypass with exclusion of the intact infra-renal aortic aneurysm: the in-situ management of aortic aneurysms. A preliminary report

Transabdominal aortic aneurysmorraphy with graft replacement is the generally accepted and most widely applied surgical approach in the treatment of infra-renal abdominal aortic aneurysm with a mortality rate of 2-5%. The alternative, retroperitoneal exposure of the aorta, although utilized for the first reported repair of an AAA by Dubost and championed by Rob, Stipa and Shaw, Helsby and Moosa and more recently by Williams et al., offers superior exposure and decreased post-operative morbidity. Despite these advantages, it is not commonly used by most vascular surgeons for the surgical management of aortic aneurysms. We have treated 35 patients using an extended retroperitoneal approach in which the aneurysm was treated by division of the infra-renal aorta, an end-to-end proximal anastomosis with an aortic bypass, and over-sewing of the aneurysm. In this group of patients, we found less post-operative physiological disturbances and a reduced requirement for blood transfusion. These data suggest that this method of retroperitoneal exclusion and bypass is generally applicable and is of particular value in the obese and/or the higher risk, medically disadvantaged patient.     

Thoracovisceral segment aneurysm repair after previous infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery

OBJECTIVE: Repair of thoracovisceral aortic aneurysms (TVAA) after previous open repair of an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) poses significant challenges. We sought to better characterize such recurrent aneurysms and to evaluate their operative outcome. METHODS: We reviewed the records and radiographs of 49 patients who underwent repair of TVAAs between 1988 and 2002 after previous repair of an AAA. Visceral artery reconstructions were completed with combinations of beveled anastomoses, inclusion patches, and side arm grafts. In 14 patients visceral endarterectomy was required to treat associated occlusive disease. Sixteen patients had cerebrospinal fluid drainage, and 10 patients had distal perfusion during cross-clamping. RESULTS: Patient mean age was 72 years, and 80% were men. Fifty-one percent of patients had symptomatic disease, and average TVAA diameter was 6.2 cm. Mean time between AAA and TVAA repair was 77 months. Twenty-six percent of aneurysms were restricted to the lower visceral aortic segment, 35% extended to the diaphragm, another 35% extended to the distal or middle thoracic aorta, and 4% involved the entire remaining visceral and thoracic aorta. The 30-day operative mortality rate was 4.1% in patients with nonruptured aneurysms and 50% in patients with ruptured aneurysms, for an overall mortality rate of 8.2%. Fifteen patients (30.6%) had major morbidity, including paresis in two patients and dialysis-dependent renal failure in five patients. At late follow-up, three patients required further aortic operations to treat additional aneurysms, and four patients had fatal aortic ruptures. Two-year and 5-year cumulative survival rates were 61% (+/-7.5%) and 37% (+/-7.8%), respectively. At univariate analysis, operative blood loss was the sole significant predictor of major morbidity (P <.023), and rupture (P <.030, P <.0001) and aneurysm extent (P <.0007, P <.0001) correlated with both operative death and long-term survival. Only aneurysm extent (P <.010, relative risk 37.3) remained a significant predictor of long-term survival at multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Elective repair of TVAAs after previous AAA repair can be performed with an acceptable level of operative mortality, though with considerable operative morbidity. Limited long-term survival mandates careful patient selection, and the high mortality associated with ruptured TVAA underscores the need for post-AAA surveillance.     

Congenital abdominal aortic aneurysms in the young. Case report and review of the literature

Aneurysms of the aorta are rare in children and young adults. We report a case of a 19-year-old man with a saccular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). No associated disorders were discovered in this patient. The aneurysm was resected and a Dacron aortic graft was implanted. Nine years after operation the patient was in good health without evidence of other aneurysms. Thirty-two cases of probable congenital abdominal aortic aneurysms were collected from the literature. In 19 cases, the cause of aneurysm was not ascertained. We identified two groups of patients with probably congenital AAAs: type I congenital AAA, in which there is a generalized disorder of the arterial tissue and usually aneurysms are present in other areas and type II congenital AAA, in which there is a localized defect of the abdominal aorta, without aneurysms in other areas. We speculate that a congenital defect localized to the wall of the abdominal aorta was the cause of the aneurysm in this patient (type II congenital AAA).     

Computed tomography-detected abnormalities following conventional abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair

PURPOSE: To determine how time since the operation influences vascular abnormalities following conventional infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair.METHODS: In 47 patients computed tomography was performed 1 to 12 years following the aneurysm repair. Aortic diameters at different levels were measured and other abnormalities recorded.RESULTS: Significant correlation was found between time since operation and diameter of the suprarenal aorta (R=0.51, P<0.001) but not with aortic neck diameter (R=-0.10, P=0.48) or diameter of the prosthetic graft (R=0.07, P=0.66). However, measured diameters of graft and aortic neck showed a significant positive correlation (R=0.40, P=0.005).CONCLUSIONS: Dilatation of the suprarenal aorta has a different pattern from aortic neck dilatation. The latter showed correlation with the diameter of the prosthetic graft. This may be of interest for future design of endovascular stent-grafts.     

Extra-anatomic arterial reconstruction with ligation of common iliac arteries and embolization of the aneurysm for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms in high-risk patients

PURPOSE: The mortality of an unrepaired abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) generally exceeds the mortality associated with surgical repair. However, as our longevity increases, more frequently we see patients whose risk of surgical repair approximates the risk of rupture. We present an extra-anatomic bypass graft with complete aneurysm exclusion by iliac ligation and coil embolization of the aneurysm as an alternative for these high-risk patients. METHODS: An extra-anatomic bypass graft, followed by bilateral iliac artery ligation (retroperitoneal approach) and complete coil embolization of the AAA, was performed in eight patients (mean age, 77 years) found to be at prohibitive operative risk because of multiple comorbidities (American Society of Anesthesiologists class IV). Most patients (5 of 8) were symptomatic on presentation with a mean AAA diameter of 7 cm (range, 6.7-9.5 cm). We repair approximately 30 infrarenal aneurysms per year electively at our institution. RESULTS: All patients tolerated the surgical procedures. The average hospital stay was 8 days. All but two aneurysms demonstrated complete thrombosis by 48 hours. After 48 months there was no incidence of graft thrombosis, peripheral ischemia, visceral ischemia or thrombus infection. There was one perioperative death from aspiration pneumonia. Seventy-five percent (6 of 8) of patients have survived at least 1 year without surgical complications. No patient has had a ruptured aneurysm. CONCLUSION: Combining an extra-anatomic bypass graft and complete exclusion of the AAA by ligation of the common iliac arteries and a coil embolization is an effective, less invasive treatment option for patients with AAA and prohibitive operative risk. We emphasize the need for complete embolization documented by decreased aneurysm size.     

Simultaneous Operations for Combined Thoracic and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Purpose. To assess whether simultaneous operations are appropriate for combined thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms.Methods. Simultaneous operations were performed for combined thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms in nine patients. The thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) was repaired first, followed by repair of the abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Selective cerebral perfusion was used in eight patients, after the exception of one who underwent replacement of the ascending aorta under hypothermic circulatory arrest. The abdominal organs were perfused during distal anastomosis in surgery for Stanford type A aortic dissection or aortic arch aneurysm; via the femoral artery with an aortic balloon occlusion catheter in one patient, and via an occlusion catheter with a perfusion lumen in two patients.Results. All patients underwent planned simultaneous repair of the AAA. One of the patients who underwent simultaneous replacement of both the descending thoracic and abdominal aorta was left with paraplegia, and one patient died suddenly of massive hemoptysis and melena on the 29th postoperative day. Autopsy revealed that the bleeding had been caused by aorto-broncho-esophageal fistulae. The overall operative mortality was 11%.Conclusions. Simultaneous repair of combined TAA and AAA can be safely performed; however, the risk of paraplegia should be considered, especially with simultaneous repair of concomitant aneurysms of the descending thoracic and abdominal aorta.     

Endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this paper is to briefly review the historical aspects and outcome of endoluminal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair and summarise two studies presented at the 1997 and 1998 meetings of the Society for Vascular Surgery. PATIENTS: Between May 1992 and September 1998 the endoluminal method was used to repair arterial aneurysms in 304 patients at the Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, a tertiary referral teaching hospital. The study focuses on 243 patients with true AAA who underwent primary repair. There were 17 females and 226 males with a mean age of 72 years. Co-morbidities leading to rejection for conventional open repair were present in 83 patients. The criteria for inclusion included a segment of thrombus-free aorta between the lowermost renal artery and the commencement of the aneurysm of 1.5 cm or greater and iliac arteries that allowed access to the aorta from the groin. The technique involved the delivery of an endograft into the abdominal aorta by means of a sheath inserted through the femoral or iliac artery. Laparotomy associated with conventional open repair was avoided. Outcome measures included clinical examination and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) within 10 days, at 6, 12, 18 months after operation and then annually thereafter. RESULTS: Endografts were successfully deployed in 226 patients. In the remaining 17 patients endoluminal repair was converted to open repair. There were 8 deaths within 30 days of operation giving a perioperative mortality rate of 3.3%. The two studies presented to the Society for Vascular Surgery concern: (i) a concurrent comparison of the endoluminal versus open methods of treating AAA; and (ii) a comparison of adverse events following endoluminal repair of AAA during two consecutive periods of time.     

Simultaneous repair of arch and abdominal aortic aneurysms

Objective: Atherosclerotic aneurysms in the aortic arch are associated with abdominal aortic aneurysms in up to 37% of cases. We have developed a single-stage approach to the repair of both aneurysms using a temporary bypass. Subjects: Since November 1996, 5 patients underwent simultaneous repair of aneurysms in the aortic arch and in the infrarenal abdominal aorta, using a new temporary bypass graft technique. Entire arch replacement with simultaneous abdominal aortic aneurysmectomy was performed in one patient. The other 4 patients underwent distal hemiarch replacement distal from the orifice of the brachiocephalic artery with simultaneous repair of the abdominal aortic aneurysm. Method: For the entire arch replacement procedure, blood flow to all major branches of the aortic arch was established using a bifurcated graft. This graft anastomosed to the ascending aorta was used as the proximal inflow of the temporary bypass graft. For the hemiarch replacement procedure, the proximal inflow segment of the temporary bypass graft was anastomosed to the brachiocephalic artery. In both cases, the distal outflow segment of the temporary bypass graft was the graft used for repair of the abdominal aortic aneurysm. In order to prevent any clamp injury, Teflon felt was tightly wrapped around the aorta before the clamp was applied. Results: Evaluation of the hemodynamic parameters measured during cross-clamping of the aortic arch revealed stable distal perfusion to the visceral organs and no excessive increase in cardiac afterload. All patients had an uneventful postoperative course and were discharged within 1 month of surgery. Conclusion: Our temporary bypass method is recommended for simultaneous replacement of aneurysms in the aortic arch and the abdominal aorta.     

Aortic transection and diverting bypass as treatment of repetitive recurrent abdominal aortic false aneurysm rupture in a patient with Behcet's disease

Abdominal aortic false aneurysms in patients with Behcet's disease have been reported frequently and repaired successfully by various procedures; however, anastomotic false aneurysms have often been reported to occur after the operation. In this article, we report a case of four-time repetitive, recurrent suprarenal abdominal aortic false aneurysm ruptures that lasted for 7 years. The location of this aneurysm was not easy to repair not only by open surgical procedures but by endovascular stent because the aortic defect was too close to the visceral arterial branches. The last operation consisted of primary repair of aortic defect, transection of abdominal aorta at the level of supraceliac aorta with end closure, and a thoracic aorta to abdominal aorta bypass with Dacron graft. An 8-year follow-up revealed no more abdominal aortic aneurysm recurrence.     

Simultaneous repair of arch and abdominal aortic aneurysms. A simple new technique using a temporary bypass graft.

OBJECTIVE: Atherosclerotic aneurysms in the aortic arch are associated with abdominal aortic aneurysms in up to 37% of cases. We have developed a single-stage approach to the repair of both aneurysms using a temporary bypass. SUBJECTS: Since November 1996, 5 patients underwent simultaneous repair of aneurysms in the aortic arch and in the infrarenal abdominal aorta, using a new temporary bypass graft technique. Entire arch replacement with simultaneous abdominal aortic aneurysmectomy was performed in one patient. The other 4 patients underwent distal hemi-arch replacement distal from the orifice of the brachiocephalic artery with simultaneous repair of the abdominal aortic aneurysm. METHOD: For the entire arch replacement procedure, blood flow to all major branches of the aortic arch was established using a bifurcated graft. This graft anastomosed to the ascending aorta was used as the proximal inflow of the temporary bypass graft. For the hemi-arch replacement procedure, the proximal inflow segment of the temporary bypass graft was anastomosed to the brachiocephalic artery. In both cases, the distal outflow segment of the temporary bypass graft was the graft used for repair of the abdominal aortic aneurysm. In order to prevent any clamp injury, Teflon felt was tightly wrapped around the aorta before the clamp was applied. RESULTS: Evaluation of the hemodynamic parameters measured during cross-clamping of the aortic arch revealed stable distal perfusion to the visceral organs and no excessive increase in cardiac afterload. All patients had an uneventful postoperative course and were discharged within 1 month of surgery. CONCLUSION: Our temporary bypass method is recommended for simultaneous replacement of aneurysms in the aortic arch and the abdominal aorta.     

Endovascular stent grafts as a safe secondary option for para-anastomotic abdominal aortic aneurysm.

OBJECTIVE: To describe our experience of endovascular repair of para-anastomotic aortic aneurysm. METHODS AND RESULTS: From March 2001 to December 2004 we identified 6 patients with a para-anastomotic aortic aneurysms following previous open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. All patients were treated with endovascular surgery under epidural anaesthesia. There were no major complications, surgical conversions or deaths. Four patients received a bifurcated aortic stent-graft, and two an aorto-uniliac stent-graft followed by a femoro-femoral bypass. At follow-up (mean 26.1+/-10.2 months) there were no deaths, endoleaks or graft migrations observed. CONCLUSION: Endovascular surgery, avoiding general anesthesia and re-laparotomy, is the ideal technique for treatment of this complication resulting from failed primary conventional AAA repair.     

The hybrid total arch repair: brachiocephalic bypass and concomitant endovascular aortic arch stent graft placement

BACKGROUND: Repair of aortic arch aneurysm is technically demanding, requiring complex circulatory management. Very large atherosclerotic saccular aneurysms of the arch are grave markers of extensive arch and brachiocephalic atheromatous disease and represent high surgical risks for perioperative neurologic complications. Operative morbidity and mortality may be prohibitive with traditional surgical intervention. We described our experience with a hybrid procedure for total arch repair with a brachiocephalic bypass with a trifurcated graft followed by concomitant placement of a stent graft in the arch. METHODS: Since June 2005, we have performed the hybrid total arch repair in eight patients. A retrospective review was performed to evaluate the new technique. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 67 years with a mean aneurysm size of 8 cm (range, 4.4 to 10 cm). Significant comorbidities included carotid stenosis, chronic renal insufficiency, peripheral vascular disease, hypertension, and coronary artery disease. Two patients had previous Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repairs. Three patients had previous sternotomy for type A dissection, ascending aortic aneurysm repair, and coronary artery bypass grafting. Transesophageal echocardiogram demonstrated grade IV or V atheromatous disease in the arch and ascending aorta. Stent grafts were deployed antegrade directly into the ascending aorta in three patients and retrograde from the femoral artery in five patients. Technical success with complete aneurysmal exclusion was achieved in all patients (100%). At a mean follow-up period of 11.7 months, there was no incidence of endoleak. There was one death resulting from a perioperative myocardial infarction (first patient). Documented perioperative neurologic events (stroke) occurred in two patients, with both patients demonstrating no residual deficit at the time of discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Saccular arch aneurysms can be technically treated by total arch repair with brachiocephalic bypass and concomitant aortic arch stent graft placement. Hybrid arch repair provides an alternative to patients otherwise considered prohibitively high risk for traditional open arch repair.     

Elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: does the aneurysm diameter influence long-term survival?

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate whether initial abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) diameter influences long-term survival after elective repair. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of database. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between March 1995 and December 2006, a consecutive series of 895 patients underwent elective treatment of an AAA either by open surgical or endovascular repair. An AAA diameter of 5.5cm was chosen as threshold to distinguish between small and large aneurysms, according to the definition given by the UK small aneurysm trial. Patient characteristics and distribution of basic risk factors were assessed. Survival estimates (Kaplan-Meier) and Cox proportional hazards regression results are reported. RESULTS: Patients with small aneurysms were more likely to survive the first 6 years after AAA repair, even after adjustment for treatment modality and baseline risk factors. After adjustment for age and sex aneurysms with smaller diameter were related to a lower risk of death (p<0.0016). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with small aneurysms (< or =5.5cm) have an improved long-term survival than patients with larger aneurysms.     

外科手术在肾下腹主动脉瘤治疗中的地位(附187例手术经验)

目的：就肾下型腹主动脉瘤的治疗经验，讨论外科手术的实用性和前途。方法：回顾分析1992年1月至2004年2月择期行肾下型腹主动脉瘤切除术187例，将其结果与经腔内治疗者作比较。结果：围手术期死亡1例(0．54％)，死亡原因是术后6h出现频发室性早搏、室颤，诱发大面积心肌梗死。手术时间平均为3．8h；出血量平均470ml．输血量445ml。ICU内恢复时间为12～24h。围手术期并发症包括心力衰竭17例，呼吸衰竭8例，急性心肌梗死2例，急性脑梗死1例，急性肾功能衰竭3例，无术后严重出血或失血性休克发生，也无下肢动脉栓塞发生。术后1、3、5年生存率分别为97．0％、84．6％及78.3％，随访期间病人死亡者的原因与腹主动脉瘤和手术无关。经腔内治疗手术目前仍有较高的中、远期并发症。结论：瘤体直径不能作为手术适应证的唯一指标。术前同时应确切评价全身重要脏器功能。影响腹主动脉瘤手术的危险因素主要是高龄、严重心、肺疾患及肾功能不全等。迄今，经腹手术仍是治疗腹主动脉瘤的主要方法。     

Endovascular repair or surveillance of patients with small AAA.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcome of patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) treated in a prospective trial of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) to patients randomized to the surveillance arm of the UK Small Aneurysm Trial. METHOD: All patients with small AAA (< or = 5.5 cm diameter) treated with a stent graft (EVARsmall) in the multicenter AneuRx clinical trial from 1997 to 1999 were reviewed with follow up through 2003. A subgroup of patients (EVARmatch) who met the age (60-76 years) and aneurysm size (4.0-5.5 cm diameter) inclusion criteria of the UK Small Aneurysm Trial were compared to the published results of the surveillance patient cohort (UKsurveil) of the UK Small Aneurysm Trial (NEJM 346:1445, 2002). Endpoints of comparison were aneurysm rupture, fatal aneurysm rupture, operative mortality, aneurysm related death and overall mortality. The total patient years of follow-up for EVAR patients was 1369 years and for UK patients was 3048 years. Statistical comparisons of EVARmatch and UKsurveil patients were made for rates per 100 patient years of follow up (/100 years) to adjust for differences in follow-up time. RESULTS: The EVARsmall group of 478 patients comprised 40% of the total number of patients treated during the course of the AneuRx clinical trial. The EVARmatch group of 312 patients excluded 151 patients for age < 60 or > 76 years and 15 patients for AAA diameter < 4 cm. With the exception of age, there were no significant differences between EVARsmall and EVARmatch in pre-operative factors or post-operative outcomes. In comparison to the UKsurveil group of 527 patients, the EVARmatch group was slightly older (70 +/- 4 vs. 69 +/- 4 years, p = 0.009), had larger aneurysms (5.0 +/- 0.3 vs. 4.6 +/- 0.4 cm, p < 0.001), fewer women (7 vs. 18%, p < 0.001), and had a higher prevalence of diabetes and hypertension and a lower prevalence of smoking at baseline. Ruptures occurred in 1.6% of EVARmatch patients and 5.1% of UKsurveil patients; this difference was not significant when adjusted for the difference in length of follow up. Fatal aneurysm rupture rate, adjusted for follow up time, was four times higher in UKsurveil (0.8/100 patient years) than in EVARmatch (0.2/100 patient years, p < 0.001); this difference remained significant when adjusted for difference in gender mix. Elective operative mortality rate was significantly lower in EVARmatch (1.9%) than in UKsurveil (5.9%, p < 0.01). Aneurysm-related death rate was two times higher in UKsurveil (1.6/100 patient years) than in EVARmatch (0.8/100 patient years, p = 0.03). All-cause mortality rate was significantly higher in UKsurveil (8.3/100 patient years) than in EVARmatch (6.4/100 patient years, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: It appears that endovascular repair of small abdominal aortic aneurysms (4.0-5.5 cm) significantly reduces the risk of fatal aneurysm rupture and aneurysm-related death and improves overall patient survival compared to an ultrasound surveillance strategy with selective open surgical repair.     

Transluminally placed endovascular graft indications: thoracic aortic aneurysm and abdominal aortic aneurysm]

In 1991, Parodi et al described the first clinical use of a new technique for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair using transluminally placed endovascular grafts (TPEG). Subsequently, in 1994 Dake et al reported the use of this new technique for the treatment of patients with aneurysms of the descending thoracic aorta. Since then, TPEG for the treatment of aneurysms have been clinically investigated in a number of centers. Initially, TPEG appeared to be an attractive alternative to standard surgical open repair, since they are less invasive and thereby reduce the operative risk in high-risk patients. The effectiveness and safety of TPEG have been reported by many investigators, and indications for this technique are increasing. However, the placement of TPEG within the artery by insertion via a remote site and fixation by attachment systems, such as various types of expandable stents, is completely different from conventional graft replacement. The long-term durability of TPEG is not yet known, and therefore we must remain cautious in patient selection. The cause and morphology of each aortic aneurysm determine whether TPEG are indicated. At present, TPEG is used to treat patients with aneurysms below the distal arch, and infrarenal abdominal aorta. However, indications in patients with aortic dissections are not clearly defined, because though the procedure is technically feasible, the effectiveness is not yet known and further investigation is required.