腹腔镜手术治疗急性结石性胆囊炎效果观察

目的观察腹腔镜胆囊切术(LC)治疗急性结石性胆囊炎的效果。方法将100例急性结石性胆囊炎患者随机分成观察组和对照组2组,各50例。对照组采用传统开腹手术,观察组采用LC,比较2组患者的术中出血量、手术时间、住院时间、术后肛门排气时间、肠鸣恢复时间及并发症。结果观察组术中出血量、手术时间、住院时间、术后肛门排气时间及肠鸣恢复时间均低于对照组,2组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组并发症发生率例低于对照组,2组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 LC治疗急性结石性胆囊炎术中出血量少,并发症发生率低,术后恢复快,值得临床应用。     

腹腔镜切除胆囊手术治疗急性结石性胆囊炎的疗效观察

目的总结腹腔镜胆囊切除术(l C)治疗急性结石性胆囊炎的疗效,为临床应用提供依据。方法将80例急性结石性胆囊炎患者随机分为对照组和观察组,各40例。对照组行开腹胆囊切除手术,观察组行l C。比较两组手术效果术后并发症发生情况。结果观察组除1例因粘连严重而中转开腹外,余均顺利完成手术。手术时间、术中出血量,术后下床时间及术后并发生率均低于对照组,两组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 l C损伤小、痛苦少、恢复快、术后并发症少,效果肯定。但应严格掌握手术适应证。     

腹腔镜治疗急性结石性胆囊炎体会

<正> 我科1996年6月至1999年2月行腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)700例,其中采用腹腔镜多术式治疗急性结石性胆囊炎140例,取得较好疗效,现报告如下:     

腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性坏疽性结石性胆囊炎

目的探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性坏疽性结石性胆囊炎的手术适应证、手术技巧及并发症的防治。方法回顾分析2005年7月至2009年7月采取顺切、逆切或大部分切除等方法行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的500例急性坏疽性结石性胆囊炎患者的临床资料。结果合并胆囊胃瘘1例,同时行胃修补术;胆总管损伤4例,术中用5-0可吸收线行一期缝合,术后无胆漏、胆管狭窄发生。8例中转开腹。手术时间20～90min,平均35min;术中出血5～100ml,平均30ml。术中无肠管、血管损伤,术后无胆漏、出血发生,无其他严重并发症,全组无死亡病例。320例放置引流管,术后24～48h拔除。术后3～8d痊愈出院,平均住院时间5d。全组腹腔镜胆囊切除术成功率98.4%,中转开腹率1.6%。结论只要掌握恰当的适应证与手术时机,应用顺切、逆切或大部切除等方法,急性坏疽性结石性胆囊炎是可以安全成功施行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的。     

腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性结石性胆囊炎332例

目的总结腹腔镜胆囊切除术（LC）治疗急性结石性胆囊炎的经验。方法回顾性分析2009年6月至2011年6月332例急性结石性胆囊炎患者的临床资料,采用三孔法或四孔法行LC。结果 313例成功施行LC,平均住院4.9d。19例中转开腹。仅1例出现术后淋巴漏,留置腹腔引流,13d后拔除引流管后出院,住院17d。结论急性结石性胆囊炎如有手术指征,应尽早手术,LC可减少患者的住院时间,减少抗菌药物的应用。     

腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗老年急性结石性胆囊炎分析

目的 评价腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗老年急性结石性胆囊炎的可行性.方法 对56 例在2 天内急性发作老年急性结石性胆囊炎的患者进行LC 的病例资料进行分析.结果 56 例接受LC 的患者均恢复良好,痊愈出院,术后随访6 个月以上未发现不良反应.结论 患者在2 天之内急性发作的患者均可耐受LC.     

急性结石性胆囊炎腹腔镜胆囊切除术效果观察

目的比较腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)与开腹胆囊切除术治疗急性结石性胆囊炎的效果。方法选取2015-03—2017-03间潢川县人民医院收治的116例急性结石性胆囊炎患者。根据不同术式分为2组,各58例。对照组行开腹胆囊切除术,观察组行LC。比较2组疗效和超敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)的水平。结果观察组手术时间、术中出血量和术后肠胃功能恢复时间、住院时间及并发症发生率均优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。术前2组hs-CRP水平差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。术后2组均有程度不等的增高,但观察组升高幅度小于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论与开腹术式比较,LC治疗急性结石性胆囊炎,术中出血量少,术后恢复快,并发症发生率低,而且能减轻术后炎症因子对疗效的影响。     

腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性结石性胆囊炎的临床体会

目的分析腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性结石性胆囊炎的效果。方法对46急性结石性胆囊炎患者实施腹腔镜胆囊切除术,并对其临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果 44例顺利完成胆囊切除术,2例患者因胆囊三角区致密粘连解剖困难无法辨清"三管"关系而中转开腹。手术时间40.00~51.60 min,平均45.26 min。未发生切口感染、出血、胆管损伤等并发症及死亡病例。术后住院时间3~7 d,平均4.68 d,均痊愈出院。结论腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性结石性胆囊炎,创伤小、术后并发症少、恢复时间短。但应严格掌握手术适应证和把握好中转开腹的时机。     

慢性非结石性胆囊炎腹腔镜手术指征的探讨

对慢性非结石性胆囊炎的手术治疗，传统开腹胆囊切除手术（OC）由于受到手术创伤大、切口长、术后切口疼痛较重、恢复时间较长等因素的影响，多不易被患者所接受。因此，临床上对手术指征的掌握就相对比较严格，主要适用于慢性胆囊炎有急性发作史、长期间歇发作的消化道功能紊乱、胆囊炎合并胆囊息肉以及胆囊丧失功能等情况。然而，随着腹腔镜胆囊切除术（LC）技术的成熟和广泛应用，其所具有的创伤小、术后疼痛轻微、住院时间短、可早日恢复工作以及手术安全可靠的特点已经被广大临床医生和病员所接受。     

高龄老人急性结石性胆囊炎腹腔镜手术治疗经验

目的探讨高龄老人急性结石性胆囊炎(acute calculous cholecystitis,ACC)的手术指征、时机和技巧,以期提高其腹腔镜手术治疗效果。方法收集首都医科大学北京电力医院普外科2013年7月至2016年11月收治的43例高龄老人(≥80岁)ACC病人的临床资料,平均年龄为(83.5±2.7)岁,根据其是否具有手术指征,分为手术组和非手术组,对其并存病、实验室检查、手术时机(术前发病时间、体温、血白细胞计数及中性粒细胞比例、高敏C反应蛋白)、手术效果(手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院天数)、术后并发症和治疗效果进行分析。结果 43例高龄老人ACC病人手术组17例,其中腹腔镜胆囊切除术(laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC)13例(最大年龄88岁,成功率100%),开腹胆囊切除术(open cholecystectomy,OC)4例,非手术组26例。手术组较非手术组疗效显著提高(P=0.003),LC组治愈率(92.3%)显著高于OC组(75.0%)。手术时机对手术效果无显著影响(P0.05),但对术后并发症有一定影响。结论高龄老人ACC病人LC是安全可行的,关键是掌握手术指征和时机、熟练掌握腹腔镜手术技巧,同时加强围手术期治疗,以期进一步提高其治疗效果和安全性。     

急性结石性胆囊炎经腹腔镜胆囊切除术68例临床分析

目的探讨急性结石性胆囊炎行腹腔镜胆囊切除术(laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC)患者的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2007-12—2011-12通过LC治疗68例急性结石性胆囊炎患者的临床资料。结果 68例患者中,67例顺利完成LC,其中1例中转剖腹,术后病理证实为肝门部胆管癌,合并结石性、化脓性胆囊炎,2例患者发病72 h后出现胆汁渗漏,经治疗痊愈。2例术后第2天腹腔引流管引流出胆汁样液体,量为200～300 mL,经治疗2周后无液体引出拔出引流管,顺利出院。结论急性结石性胆囊炎明确诊断后,患者应尽早施行腹腔镜胆囊切除术,术中操作困难者应及时中转开腹。尽量减少或避免急性结石性胆囊炎LC手术并发症的发生,显著减轻患者痛苦。     

腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性结石性胆囊炎临床体会

目的：探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除术（laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC）治疗急性结石性胆囊炎的手术及操作要点。方法：回顾分析我院2000年3月-2009年8月行LC治疗的1260例急性胆囊炎并胆囊结石病例。结果：顺利完成LC1220例,中转开腹胆囊切除术40例,无术中大出血、肝外胆管损伤而中转开腹的病例。无术后胆汁漏、腹腔内出血等严重并发症发生。所有患者随访3月～1年,无胆管狭窄等相关并发症发生。结论：LC治疗急性胆囊炎安全可行,术者必须充分了解LC操作要点和熟练掌握操作技术。     

腹腔镜与开腹胆囊切除治疗急性结石性胆囊炎的临床分析

目的探讨腹腔镜与开腹胆囊切除治疗急性结石性胆囊炎的临床疗效及对机体炎症反应的影响。 方法回顾性分析2015年1月至2017年6月收治的117例急性结石性胆囊炎的临床资料,根据手术方式分为腹腔镜组(61例)和开腹组(56例),采用SPSS17.0软件对所有临床数据进行统计学分析,两组患者术前术后各项指标、疼痛视觉模拟评分(VSA)及炎症相关指标等计量资料以( ±s)表示,采用独立t检验;全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)发生率及并发症发生率等组间比较采用χ²检验,均以P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。 结果腹腔镜组患者手术时间、切口长度、术中出血量、肛门首次排气时间、VSA评分、下床活动时间、恢复饮食时间以及平均住院时间均明显优于开腹组(均P<0.05);两组患者术后并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。腹腔镜组患者术后1 d、3 d、5 d的血清中C－反应蛋白(CRP)、白介素－6(IL－6)水平和7 d内全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)发生率均明显低于开腹组(P<0.05)。 结论腹腔镜胆囊切除治疗急性结石性胆囊炎是安全可行的,具有手术时间短、术中出血少、术后恢复快及炎症反应轻的优势,值得在临床中进一步推广应用。     

腹腔镜治疗急性结石性胆囊炎50例的临床研究

目的研究探讨腹腔镜技术在急性结石性胆囊炎治疗中的安全可靠性。方法通过我科2013年1月至2016年1月收治的50例急性结石性胆囊炎患者的临床资料,回顾分析腹腔镜治疗急性结石性胆囊炎的疗效。其中对照组开腹胆囊切除术(OC)40例,试验组腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)50例。对比分析两组的手术时间、术后恢复及并发症情况。结果 LC组的切口愈合时间及手术时间均低于OC组(P0.05)。腹腔镜胆囊切除术除5例中转开腹,余术后无胆漏、胆道狭窄等严重并发症。结论在术者拥有熟练的腹腔镜操作技术的前提下,大多数急性结石性胆囊炎患者行LC是安全可行的。与开腹手术相比,有一定的优势。但仍存在一定的手术风险。     

急性胆囊炎腹腔镜胆囊切除术93例体会

目的总结腹腔镜下处理急性胆囊炎的临床经验。方法回顾性分析2003年5月-2005年5月93例急性胆囊炎行腹腔镜手术治疗的临床资料，其中15例术前确诊胆总管结石而先行内镜逆行胰胆管造影（endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography，ERCP）联合内镜括约肌切开（endoscopic sphincterotomy，EST）取石，6例疑似胆道结石者行术中胆道造影。均于48h内完成LC。结果91例（97．8％）手术成功，2例（2．2％）中转开腹。手术时间35—160min，平均65min。术后胆囊管残端漏3例（3．2％），胆道残余结石3例（3．2％），经开腹手术结合ERCP、EST、鼻胆管引流（endoscopic nasobiliary drainage，ENBD）治愈，全组无医源性损伤。结论选择性应用ERCP和EST，腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎是安全可行的，但中转开腹及并发症的发生率高。     

Predicting conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be safely performed in patients with acute cholecystitis. However, the rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy remains higher when compared with patients with chronic cholecystitis. Preoperative clinical or laboratory parameters that could predict the need for conversion may assist the surgeon in preoperative or intraoperative decision making. This could have cost-saving implications. METHODS: A retrospective review of 46 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis was performed. Records were assessed for preoperative clinical, laboratory and radiographic parameters on admission. Temperature and laboratory parameters were also recorded prior to surgery after an initial period of hospitalization that included intravenous antibiotics. The effect of admission and preoperative parameters as well as the trend in these parameters prior to surgery upon the rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy was assessed. RESULTS: Ten patients (22%) required conversion to open cholecystectomy. Conversion was required more often in males (43%) when compared with females (4%) (p=0.003). Conversion rate was 30% in patients with increased wall thickness by ultrasound compared with 12% for patients without wall thickening (p=ns). No admission or preoperative laboratory values predicted conversion. The trend in the patient's temperature (p=0.0003) and serum LDH value (p=0.043) predicted the need for conversion to open surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative prediction of the need for open cholecystectomy remains elusive. Male patients and patients with rising temperature and LDH levels while on intravenous antibiotics require conversion at increased frequency. However, the benefits of laparoscopic cholecystectomy warrant an attempt at laparoscopic removal in most patients with acute cholecystitis.     

腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性结石性胆囊炎的体会

目的总结急性结石性胆囊炎患者行腹腔镜胆囊切除术(1aparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC)的临床经验及适应证和手术技巧。方法回顾性分析2000-09～2009-09为132例急性结石性胆囊炎患者行LC的临床资料。结果120例成功完成LC,中转开腹12例。手术时间40～120min,平均60min。术后住院4～21d,平均7d。术后无严重并发症发生。结论只要把握手术时机、掌握好手术技巧、及时和必要的中转开腹,急性结石性胆囊炎患者行腹腔镜胆囊切除术是安全可行的。     

Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: A safe procedure

Acute cholecystitis is increasingly managed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Some reports have shown conversion and complication rates that are increased in comparison to elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This study reviews the combined experience of two hospitals where the intention was to perform early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. A total of 152 cases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (evidence of acute inflammation clinically and pathologically) were identified. Conversion to open cholecystectomy was required in 14 cases (9%) in the total series. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed within 2 days of admission in 76% (115 of 152) of patients. Conversion was significantly less likely in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy within 2 days of admission (4 of 115) compared to those undergoing surgery beyond 2 days (10 of 37; P <0.0001). Eleven patients (7%) had postoperative complications; however, there were no cases of injury to the biliary system and no perioperative deaths. This series shows that laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be performed safely in patients with acute cholecystitis and suggests that early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is preferable to delaying surgery. Although the conversion rate to open surgery is higher than for elective cholecystectomy, the majority of patients (91 %) still derive the well-recognized benefits of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is an acceptable approach to acute cholecystitis for the experienced laparoscopic surgeon.     

Delayed laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis with severe fibrotic adhesions

Background  Conversion rate to open surgery is higher for patients with acute cholecystitis than in those without acute cholecystitis. We attempted to develop a laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy to decrease this conversion rate. Methods  From 2000 to 2005, laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis was performed in 60 patients (22 women, 38 men). Patients were divided into two groups: group A (2000 to 2002, n = 22) and group B (2003 to 2005, n = 38). When significant difficulty was encountered dissecting the gallbladder from its bed, we incised the gallbladder wall leaving the posterior wall and cauterizing the remnant mucosa (subtotal cholecystectomy, SC-1). When dissection of the gall bladder neck and triangle of Calot was difficult, the neck of the gallbladder was sutured despite clipping (SC-2). Results  Mean duration from onset of symptoms to operation was 55.3 ± 52.0 days. SC-1 was performed in 8 patients in group A and 18 patients in group B. SC-2 was performed in three patients in Group B. Conversion rate was 18.1% (4/22) in group A and 0% (0/38) in group B, compared to 0.4% (1/221) for patients without acute cholecystitis. No complications were associated with ablated gallbladder mucosa. Conclusion  Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy offers safe and effective treatment for acute cholecystitis. The conversion rate in group B is decreased by avoiding hazardous dissection of the cystic duct.