Effects of foot orthoses and valgus bracing on the knee adduction moment and medial joint load during gait

BACKGROUND: Lateral shoe wedges and valgus knee braces are designed to decrease the force acting in the medial knee compartment by reducing the external adduction moment applied at the knee. The biomechanical changes introduced by these orthoses can be relatively small. Computer modeling and simulation offers an alternative approach for assessing the biomechanical performance of these devices. METHODS: A three-dimensional model of the lower-limb was used to calculate muscle, ligament, and joint loading at the knee during gait. A lateral shoe wedge was simulated by moving the center of pressure of the ground reaction force up to 5mm laterally. A valgus knee brace was simulated by applying abduction moments of up to 12 Nm at the knee. FINDINGS: Knee adduction moment and medial compartment load decreased linearly with lateral displacement of the center of pressure of the ground reaction force. A 1 mm displacement of the center of pressure decreased the peak knee adduction moment by 2%, while the peak medial compartment load was reduced by 1%. Knee adduction moment and medial compartment force also decreased linearly with valgus moments applied about the knee. A 1 Nm increase in brace moment decreased the peak knee adduction moment by 3%, while the peak medial compartment load was reduced by 1%. INTERPRETATION: Changes in knee joint loading due to lateral shoe wedges and valgus bracing are small and may be difficult to measure by conventional gait analysis methods. The relationships between lateral shift in the center of pressure of the ground force, valgus brace moment, knee adduction moment, and medial joint load can be quantified and explained using computer modeling and simulation. These relationships may serve as a useful guide for evaluating the biomechanical efficacy of a generic wedge insole or knee brace.     

Contribution of knee adduction moment impulse to pain and disability in Japanese women with medial knee osteoarthritis

Background

An increase in the knee adduction moment is one of the risk factors of medial knee osteoarthritis. This study examined the relationship between knee adduction moment and self-reported pain and disability. We also investigated the influence of pain on the relationships between knee adduction moment and gait performance and disability.

Methods

Thirty-eight Japanese women with medial knee osteoarthritis participated in this study (66.37 years (41–79 years)). Gait analysis involved the measurement of the external knee adduction moment impulse in the stance duration and during 3 subdivisions of stance. The total, pain and stiffness, and physical function Japanese Knee Osteoarthritis Measure scores were determined.

Findings

The pain and stiffness, physical function, and total scores were positively correlated with the knee adduction moment impulses in the stance duration, and initial and second double support interval, and single limb support interval. The knee adduction moment impulse during the stance duration was related to the pain and stiffness subscale and gait velocity. The pain and stiffness subscale was related to the physical function subscale.

Interpretation

Our results suggest that increasing in the knee adduction moment impulse, a proxy for loading on the medial compartment of the knee, is related to increased pain during weight-bearing activities such as walking, thereby restricting walking performance and causing disability by reducing gait velocity. Thus, the reduction in the knee adduction moment impulse during gait may result in pain relief and may serve as a conservative treatment option with disease-modifying potential.     

Knee joint kinematics, kinetics and muscle co-contraction in knee osteoarthritis patient gait

Background

Compared to matched controls, knee osteoarthritis patients walk with altered, kinematics, kinetics and muscle activity. Studies of osteoarthritis patient gait have focused on individual measures, and findings from these studies differ due to differences in patient levels of disability and age. Therefore, aims of this study were to examine kinematic, kinetic and muscle co-contraction gait variables within a single osteoarthritis patient group, and to determine if alterations in these variables are related to pain, symptom and function measures.

Methods

Thirty asymptomatic controls and 54 patients with radiographic evidence of knee osteoarthritis participated. Self-perceived measures of pain and symptoms, and gait (knee joint angles, moments and muscle co-contraction) were analysed and compared.

Findings

Osteoarthritis patients had greater self-perceived pain and symptoms on the questionnaires. Gait differences in the knee osteoarthritis patients were greater knee flexion at heel strike and during early stance along with reductions in the peak external knee extension moment in late stance. Co-contraction ratios highlighted greater lateral muscle activation in osteoarthritis patients, which were correlated with the magnitude of their adduction moments. Larger adduction moments were related to lower self-perceived pain and symptoms.

Interpretation

Osteoarthritis patients use predominantly lateral muscle activation during stance which may aid in stabilising the external knee adduction moment. Kinematic alterations in knee osteoarthritis patient gait occur without alterations in knee joint moments. Our results also suggest that adduction moments are lowered to reduce the patients’ pain and symptoms.     

Biomechanical comparison of frontal plane knee joint moment arms during normal and Tai Chi walking

[Purpose] Medial knee osteoarthritis, a degenerative joint disease, affects adults. The external knee adduction moment, a surrogate knee-loading measure, has clinical implications for knee osteoarthritis patients. Tai Chi is a promising intervention for pain alleviation in knee osteoarthritis; however, the characteristics of external knee adduction moment during Tai Chi have not been established. [Subjects and Methods] During normal and Tai Chi walking, a gait analysis was performed to compare the external knee adduction moment moment-arm characteristics and paired t-tests to compare moment-arm magnitudes. [Results] A significant difference was observed in the average lateral direction of moment-arm magnitude during Tai Chi walking (−0.0239 ± 0.011 m) compared to that during normal walking (−0.0057 ± 0.004 m). No significant difference was found between conditions in average medial direction of moment-arm magnitude (normal walking: 0.0143 ± 0.010 m; Tai Chi walking: 0.0098 ± 0.014 m). [Conclusion] Tai Chi walking produced a larger peak lateral moment-arm value than normal walking during the stance phase, whereas Tai Chi walking and normal walking peak medial moment-arm values were similar, suggesting that medial knee joint loading may be avoided during Tai Chi walking.Key words: Tai Chi gait, External knee adduction moment arm, Walking     

The effect of gait modification on the external knee adduction moment is reference frame dependent

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the extent to which reference frame convention affects the interpretation of how gait modification alters the external knee adduction moment. METHODS: Data were collected from a single male able-bodied subject performing three gait tasks: normal, toe out and medial thrust. The net external moment vector at the knee was expressed in five alternative reference frames: the femur anatomical frame, the proximal tibia anatomical frame, the distal tibia anatomical frame, the laboratory frame and a non-orthogonal knee joint coordinate system. For each reference frame, the knee adduction moment was taken as the component about the frame's anteroposterior axis. FINDINGS: Gait modification and selected reference frame both influenced the calculated knee adduction moment. Furthermore, these two effects were interactive, with the magnitude of the changes in the knee adduction moment produced by toe out and medial thrust gait being highly dependent on selected reference frame. INTERPRETATION: Choice of reference frame for calculating the external knee adduction moment is therefore an important consideration for studies investigating the relative effectiveness of interventions such as gait modification.     

Comparison of peak knee adduction moment and knee adduction moment impulse in distinguishing between severities of knee osteoarthritis

Background

The peak knee adduction moment is a valid proxy for medial knee joint loading. However as it only measures load at one instance of stance, knee adduction moment impulse, a measure that takes into account both the magnitude and duration of the stance phase, may provide more comprehensive information. This study directly compared the abilities of peak knee adduction moment and knee adduction moment impulse to distinguish between knee osteoarthritis severities.

Methods

169 participants with medial knee osteoarthritis completed radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index to assess pain and a three-dimensional gait analysis. Participants were classified using four dichotomous classifications: Kellgren–Lawrence grading, alignment, medial tibiofemoral bone marrow lesions, and pain.

Findings

When using Kellgren–Lawrence grade and alignment classifications, the area under the receiver operator curves were significantly greater for knee adduction moment impulse than for peak knee adduction moment. Based on analysis of covariance, knee adduction moment impulse was significantly different between Kellgren–Lawrence grade and alignment groups while peak knee adduction moment was not significantly different. Both peak knee adduction moment and knee adduction moment impulse distinguished between bone marrow lesion severities while neither measure was significantly different between pain severity groups.

Interpretations

Findings suggest knee adduction moment impulse is more sensitive at distinguishing between disease severities and may provide more comprehensive information on medial knee joint loading. Future studies investigating biomechanics of knee osteoarthritis should include knee adduction moment impulse in conjunction with peak knee adduction moment.     

Effect of foot rotation on knee kinetics and hamstring activation in older adults with and without signs of knee osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND: To determine the effects of changing the natural foot progression angle during gait (internal and external foot rotation) on the knee's adduction moment, lateral-medial shear force, and the ratio of medial-lateral hamstring muscle activation in those with signs of knee osteoarthritis and a matched healthy control group. METHODS: Twelve subjects with signs of knee osteoarthritis and 12 matched healthy control subjects were evaluated. A 3D gait analysis system calculated forces and moments at the knee while the subjects walked in three conditions: (1) normal foot position, (2) external foot rotation, (3) internal foot rotation. Medial and lateral hamstring EMG data was also collected simultaneously and used to calculate the medial-lateral hamstring activation ratio during the stance phase of the gait cycle. Repeated measures ANOVAs were used to compare foot rotation conditions within each group; while between group comparisons were performed in the normal rotation condition only using t-tests. FINDINGS: Those with knee osteoarthritis (OA) had an increased late stance knee adduction moment and a decreased medial-lateral hamstring activation ratio as compared to the healthy control group. Also, external foot rotation decreased the late stance knee adduction moment, lateral-medial shear force, and hamstring activation ratio. However, internal foot rotation did not increase these measures. INTERPRETATION: Changes in foot position during gait have the ability to alter both the external loading of the knee joint and hamstring muscle activation patterns during gait. This may have implication in helping to unload the knee's articular cartilage.     

Surgical correction of leg alignment in unilateral knee osteoarthrosis reduces the load on the hip and knee joint bilaterally

Seventeen patients with strictly unilateral medial knee osteoarthrosis that justified surgical treatment constituted the study group. No patient had any symptoms from the hip or ankle joints or from the other knee. Eight patients were operated with high tibial osteotomy and nine were operated with unicompartmental prosthetic replacement (Brigham model). The forces and the external moment about the hip, knee, and ankle joints of the involved and uninvolved leg were calculated before and 1 year after corrective surgery and compared to the external moment in 10 normal controls. Clinical examinations was performed and the hip-knee-ankle angle in the involved leg was determined from whole-leg weightbearing radiographs before and 1 year after surgery. The external moments about the hip, knee, and ankle joints and the knee moment arms at mid-stance in the frontal plane during gait were determined with a Kistler force plate and a videorecording system. All patients improved clinically after surgery. The mean hip-knee-ankle angle changed from 11 degrees of varus to 0 degrees. In the uninvolved leg the mid-stance adduction moments about the hip and knee joints were significantly increased compared to normal subjects in the control group before surgery, but reduced to a normal level 1 year after surgery. This reduction was mainly due to a significant reduction of the medially directed force. The moments about the ankle joints were not found to be changed by the knee deformity or by the corrective surgery. RELEVANCE: This study demonstrates that a varus malalignment in the osteoarthrotic knee is accompanied by increased load about the uninvolved hip and knee joint. One might expect a more rapid progression of degenerative changes in joint cartilage as a consequence of such increased load. The reduced load after surgical correction of leg alignment might be beneficial to patients with osteoarthrosis of their hip and knee joints.     

Potential interaction of experimental knee pain and laterally wedged insoles for knee off-loading during walking

Background

Laterally wedged insoles are one of the gait modifications potentially slowing down progression of medial knee osteoarthritis. Clinical studies have, however, found large individual differences in the biomechanical effect and an insufficient pain reduction. To clarify if and how pain mediates mechanical changes during gait the current study investigated how acute experimental knee pain changes the mechanical effect of laterally wedged insoles in healthy subjects during walking.

Methods

3D gait analysis was carried out for twelve healthy individuals. The study followed a cross-over design and data were collected with both a neutral and a 10-degree laterally wedged insole with experimental pain induced by hypertonic and isotonic saline injections into the infrapatellar fat pad. Peak knee adduction moment was the primary outcome. A repeated ANOVA (analysis of variance) was used to evaluate the relationship between the factors wedge, condition and test number.

Findings

Wedges significantly reduced peak knee adduction moment but experimental knee pain did only marginally affect its magnitude in either condition. While frontal plane mechanics were relatively unaffected by pain, the sagittal plane knee extension moment increased with laterally wedging (P = 0.008), whereas late knee flexion moment was reduced by experimental knee pain (P = 0.04).

Interpretation

The effect of laterally wedged insoles in attenuating knee adduction moment during walking is independent of experimental knee pain. The present study provides evidence that subjects with experimental knee pain reduce knee loading by reducing extension moment, whereas lateral wedges have the opposite effect and increase the extension moment.     

Effect of real-time biofeedback on peak knee adduction moment in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis: Is direct feedback effective?

BackgroundGait modifications can reduce the knee adduction moment, a representation of knee loading. Reduced loading may help to slow progression of medial knee osteoarthritis. We aimed to investigate the response of patients with medial knee osteoarthritis to direct feedback on the knee adduction moment as a method for modifying the gait pattern, before and after training with specific gait modifications.MethodsForty patients with medial knee osteoarthritis underwent 3D gait analysis on an instrumented-treadmill, while receiving real-time feedback on the peak knee adduction moment. Patients were trained with three different modifications; toe-in, wider steps and medial thrust gait. The response to real-time feedback on the knee adduction moment was measured before and after training. To evaluate the short term retention effect, we measured the changes without feedback. We also evaluated the effects on the knee flexion moment and at the hip and ankle joints.FindingsWith direct feedback on the knee adduction moment, patients were initially unable to reduce the knee adduction moment. After training with specific modifications, peak knee adduction moment was reduced by 14% in response to direct feedback. Without feedback a 9% reduction in peak knee adduction moment was maintained. Hip moments were not increased with modified gait, but small increases in ankle adduction moment and knee flexion moment were observed.InterpretationReal-time biofeedback directly on the knee adduction moment is a promising option for encouraging gait modifications to reduce knee loading, however only when combined with specific instructions on how to modify the gait.     

Individual selection of gait retraining strategies is essential to optimally reduce medial knee load during gait

Background

The progression of medial knee osteoarthritis seems closely related to a high external knee adduction moment, which could be reduced through gait retraining. We aimed to determine the retraining strategy that reduces this knee moment most effective during gait, and to determine if the same strategy is the most effective for everyone.

Methods

Thirty-seven healthy participants underwent 3D gait analysis. After normal walking was recorded, participants received verbal instructions on four gait strategies (Trunk Lean, Medial Thrust, Reduced Vertical Acceleration, Toe Out). Knee adduction moment and strategy-specific kinematics were calculated for all conditions.

Findings

The overall knee adduction moment peak was reduced by Medial Thrust (− 0.08 Nm/Bw·Ht) and Trunk Lean (− 0.07 Nm/Bw·Ht), while impulse was reduced by 0.03 Nms/Bw·Ht in both conditions. Toeing out reduced late stance peak and impulse significantly but overall peak was not affected. Reducing vertical acceleration at initial contact did not reduce the overall peak. Strategy-specific kinematics (trunk lean angle, knee adduction angle, first peak of the vertical ground reaction force, foot progression angle) showed that multiple parameters were affected by all conditions. Medial Thrust was the most effective strategy in 43% of the participants, while Trunk Lean reduced external knee adduction moment most in 49%. With similar kinematics, the reduction of the knee adduction moment peak and impulse was significantly different between these groups.

Interpretation

Although Trunk Lean and Medial Thrust reduced the external knee adduction moment overall, individual selection of gait retraining strategy seems vital to optimally reduce dynamic knee load during gait.     

膝骨关节炎生物力学参数的研究进展

膝骨关节炎是老年人常见的慢性退行性疾病,其发生与发展与生物力学因素密切相关。膝关节受力受到关节形态、下肢力线、肌肉的主动收缩、外部负荷、软组织牵拉等不同因素的影响。由于体内测量限制,基于运动分析技术的生物力学参数被广泛应用于临床研究。目前应用较多的生物力学参数包括膝关节内收力矩、膝关节内收冲量、膝关节屈曲力矩、内翻延伸等。充分研究膝骨关节炎发生发展过程中膝关节生物力学参数的变化,对疾病的病因探究、诊断、干预及治疗均有重要意义。     

Kniegelenkschmerzen bei Arthrosezeichen

Chronic pain in the knee joint is most commonly caused by osteoarthritis, especially in elderly patients but can be due to other causes, such as rheumatoid arthritis. The diagnostics include an exact patient medical history and a clinical examination, which often already provide clear indications of the cause of the knee pain. Subsequently, further diagnostics can then be considered, such as radiological procedures and laboratory diagnostics. The treatment is determined by the cause and the individual patient and aims to reduce pain and to preserve the mobility of the joint. Generally, therapy consists of pain management and physiotherapy as well as alternative therapeutic procedures, mostly in combination. Proximal tibial opening wedge osteotomy can be useful; however, partial or total knee arthroplasty should only be considered when conservative treatment options have been exhausted.     

Sex affects gait adaptations after exercise in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BackgroundOsteoarthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction has been linked with changes in gait. Individuals with reconstruction demonstrate gait changes after exercise, however there is no information on altered gait after exercise based on sex. The purpose of this study was to examine the association of sex on changes in running gait after exercise in individuals with reconstruction compared to healthy.MethodsForty females (22 reconstructed) and 22 men (11 reconstructed) ran before and after exercise. Triplanar lower extremity kinematics and kinetics were measured on the involved limb. Data were reduced to 0–100% of gait. Change scores were calculated for each 1% with 90% confidence intervals. Mean differences were calculated for all significant differences.FindingsAfter exercise, females with reconstruction increased knee valgus (1.81°), knee external rotation (2.02°), lateral trunk flexion (1.24°) and trunk rotation (2.15°) compared to healthy females. Females with reconstruction increased knee extension moment (0.07 Nm/kg), knee abduction moment (0.08 Nm/kg), hip extension moment (0.14 Nm/kg) and hip internal rotation moment (0.04 Nm/kg) compared to healthy females. After exercise, males with reconstruction decreased knee varus (−4.83°), hip adduction (−1.99°), and hip internal rotation (−4.44°), however increased lateral trunk flexion (1.94°) compared to healthy males. Males with reconstruction increased knee extension moment (0.07 Nm/kg), knee adduction moment (0.31 Nm/kg), knee internal rotation moment (0.13 Nm/kg), hip flexion moment (0.17 Nm/kg), and hip external rotation moment (0.05 Nm/kg) compared to healthy males.InterpretationMales with reconstruction increased hip loading while women with reconstruction increased trunk motion post-exercise. Sex should be considered when evaluating response to exercise after reconstruction.     

Predicting knee osteoarthritis risk in injured populations

BackgroundIndividuals who suffered a lower limb injury have an increased risk of developing knee osteoarthritis. Early diagnosis of osteoarthritis and the ability to track its progression is challenging. This study aimed to explore links between self-reported knee osteoarthritis outcome scores and biomechanical gait parameters, whether self-reported outcome scores could predict gait abnormalities characteristic of knee osteoarthritis in injured populations and, whether scores and biomechanical outcomes were related to osteoarthritis severity via Spearman's correlation coefficient.MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted with asymptomatic participants, participants with lower-limb injury and those with medial knee osteoarthritis. Spearman rank determined relationships between knee injury and outcome scores and hip and knee kinetic/kinematic gait parameters. K-Nearest Neighbour algorithm was used to determine which of the evaluated parameters created the strongest classifier model.FindingsDifferences in outcome scores were evident between groups, with knee quality of life correlated to first and second peak external knee adduction moment (0.47, 0.55). Combining hip and knee kinetics with quality of life outcome produced the strongest classifier (1.00) with the least prediction error (0.02), enabling classification of injured subjects gait as characteristic of either asymptomatic or knee osteoarthritis subjects. When correlating outcome scores and biomechanical outcomes with osteoarthritis severity only maximum external hip and knee abduction moment (0.62, 0.62) in addition to first peak hip adduction moment (0.47) displayed significant correlations.InterpretationThe use of predictive models could enable clinicians to identify individuals at risk of knee osteoarthritis and be a cost-effective method for osteoarthritis screening.     

Progressive resistance training and dynamic alignment in osteoarthritis: A single-blind randomised controlled trial

Background

We hypothesised that high intensity progressive resistance training would improve lower limb dynamic alignment and function (lower knee adduction moment, increased muscle strength, and fewer knee osteoarthritis symptoms).

Methods

Women (n = 54) with osteoarthritis in at least one knee were randomised into a 6-month resistance training or a sham-exercise program. The primary outcomes were dynamic shank and knee adduction angles and knee adduction moment of the most symptomatic knee measured with quantitative gait analysis. Secondary outcomes were muscle strength, gait speed, and osteoarthritis symptoms.

Findings

Dynamic alignment and knee adduction moment did not change over time or between groups. Muscle strength improved in both groups over time, but significantly more in the resistance training group (P = 0.002). By contrast, gait velocity and pain improved over time (P ≤ 0.009) in both groups. Improvements in shank adduction angle were related to improvements in self-reported disability (r = 0.381, P = 0.015), but not to changes in muscle strength, gait velocity, or pain (all P > 0.05).

Interpretations

Although muscle strength improved significantly more in the PRT group, the hypothesised reduction in knee adduction moment, shank and knee adduction angles were not evident after either exercise modality. However, improvements in disability and shank adduction angle were significantly directly related. Initial alignment should be used to stratify this population into separate groups when designing future trials and alternative modes of training investigated to potentially enhance beneficial alterations in knee alignment.     

Robust features of knee osteoarthritis in joint moments are independent of reference frame selection

Background

Changes in lower-limb joint moments are important outcome measures for treatment and prevention of knee osteoarthritis. However, it is known that both the magnitude and amplitude of joint moments are affected by the choice of anatomical reference frame. The purpose of this study was to identify features of joint moment waveforms that, regardless of the choice of reference frame, are different for subjects with knee osteoarthritis as compared to asymptomatic control subjects.

Methods

External joint moments during the stance phase of gait were calculated for 44 subjects with moderate knee osteoarthritis and 44 asymptomatic subjects. Moments were then expressed using four anatomical reference frames: Joint Coordinate System, Plane of Progression, Proximal, and Distal. Principal component analysis was used to extract features of the moment waveforms that differed between control and osteoarthritis groups across all reference frames.

Findings

Principal component analysis revealed that, regardless of the choice of reference frame, subjects with knee osteoarthritis exhibited significantly decreased overall hip adduction moment magnitudes, increased overall knee adduction moment magnitudes, decreased knee internal rotation moment amplitudes, and increased early-stance ankle adduction magnitudes.

Interpretation

The four robust features identified in this study are sensitive to the effect of knee osteoarthritis, but independent of changes in the anatomical reference frame. These features can be solely attributed to the pathogenesis of the disease, and not to the artifact of reference frame selection.     

ASB clinical biomechanics award winner 2006 prospective study of the biomechanical factors associated with iliotibial band syndrome

BACKGROUND: Iliotibial band syndrome is the leading cause of lateral knee pain in runners. Despite its high prevalence, little is known about the biomechanics that lead to this syndrome. The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare lower extremity kinematics and kinetics between a group of female runners who develop iliotibial band syndrome compared to healthy controls. It was hypothesized that runners who develop iliotibial band syndrome will exhibit greater peak hip adduction, knee internal rotation, rearfoot eversion and no difference in knee flexion at heel strike. Additionally, the iliotibial band syndrome group were expected to have greater hip abduction, knee external rotation, and rearfoot inversion moments. METHODS: A group of healthy female recreational runners underwent an instrumented gait analysis and were then followed for two years. Eighteen runners developed iliotibial band syndrome. Their initial running mechanics were compared to a group of age and mileage matched controls with no history of knee or hip pain. Comparisons of peak hip, knee, rearfoot angles and moments were made during the stance phase of running. Variables of interest were averaged over the five running trials, and then averaged across groups. FINDINGS: The iliotibial band syndrome group exhibited significantly greater hip adduction and knee internal rotation. However, rearfoot eversion and knee flexion were similar between groups. There were no differences in moments between groups. INTERPRETATION: The development of iliotibial band syndrome appears to be related to increased peak hip adduction and knee internal rotation. These combined motions may increase iliotibial band strain causing it to compress against the lateral femoral condyle. These data suggest that treatment interventions should focus on controlling these secondary plane movements through strengthening, stretching and neuromuscular re-education.     

Changes in gait characteristics of women with early and established medial knee osteoarthritis: Results from a 2-years longitudinal study

BackgroundDespite the large number of cross-sectional studies on gait in subjects with knee osteoarthritis, there are scarcely any longitudinal studies on gait changes in knee osteoarthritis.MethodsGait analysis was performed on 25 women with early and 18 with established medial knee osteoarthritis, as well as a group of 23 healthy controls. Subjects were asked to walk at their comfortable speed. Kinematic and kinetic data were measured at baseline and after 2 years follow-up.FindingsResults indicated that the early osteoarthritis group, similar to established osteoarthritis group, showed significantly higher maximum knee adduction angles compared to the controls during the early stance phase of gait. None of the kinematic or kinetic measures, changed over two years in the early osteoarthritis group. In the established osteoarthritis group, at the time of entry, an increased first and second peak knee adduction moment, as well as higher mid-stance knee adduction moment and knee adduction moment impulse, were present compared to the control and the early osteoarthritis groups. Mid-stance knee adduction moment and knee adduction moment impulse, further increased over two years only in the established osteoarthritis group. For all three groups, the peak knee flexion angle during the stance phase decreased significantly over time.InterpretationIncreased maximum knee adduction angle during stance phase was the only alteration in the gait pattern of subjects with early knee osteoarthritis compared to the controls. This suggests that, unlike in the later stages of the disease, gait is rather stable over two years in early osteoarthritis.     

Lower limb muscle strengthening does not change frontal plane moments in women with knee osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled trial

Background

Osteoarthritis is a common musculo-skeletal problem accompanied with muscle weakness. Muscle weakness may be readily improved by resistance training. Greater muscle strength has been associated with a lower knee joint loading rate.

Methods

We conducted a single-blind randomized controlled trial of 54 female patients with osteoarthritis in at least one knee, according to the American College of Rheumatology clinical criteria. Patients were randomized into a 6-month high intensity progressive resistance training or a sham-exercise program. The primary outcomes were first peak knee and hip adduction moment measured using three-dimensional gait analysis at self-selected habitual and maximal speeds. Secondary outcomes were sagittal plane knee and hip moments, peak muscle strength, gait speed, and self-reported knee osteoarthritis symptoms measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC).

Findings

Six months of high intensity resistance training did not change the first peak knee or hip adduction moment at either habitual or maximum walking speeds (P > 0.413) compared to the sham-exercise. However, the second peak hip adduction moment (P = 0.025) and WOMAC pain score (P < 0.001) were reduced significantly in both groups over time, but there was no group effect. The changes in the second peak hip adduction moment were inversely related to the changes in the WOMAC pain score (r = − 0.394, P = 0.009).

Interpretations

Muscle strength training in women with osteoarthritis, while effective for reducing osteoarthritis symptoms, appeared to operate through mechanisms other than improved knee or hip joint loading, as paradoxically, improved symptoms were related to decreases of hip adduction moment in late stance.