The impact of targeted shortened preclinical exercises on student perceptions and outcomes

The Harvard School of Dental Medicine (HSDM) introduced problem-based learning (PBL) into the dental curriculum in 1994 as a part of curriculum reform. During the reorganization, departments were consolidated, and courses were taught in an interdisciplinary fashion rather than in a discipline-based approach. The changes required a reduction in lecture and preclinical clock hours, which might have affected student performance and anxiety levels. The objectives of this study were to 1) compare the HSDM didactic and laboratory preclinical hours in Endodontics, Operative, and Prosthodontics before and after PBL implementation; 2) compare the HSDM didactic and laboratory preclinical hours in Endodontics, Operative, and Prosthodontics with other schools nationwide; 3) measure students' perceptions of their levels of stress and self-confidence at two time points during their preclinical and clinical years; 4) investigate the correlation between the number of preclinical hours and the students' stress level and self-confidence; and 5) evaluate the impact of shortened preclinical hours on the performance of HSDM students on the National Board Dental Examination Parts I and II. A survey regarding the students' level of stress, self-confidence, and preparation to treat patients during preclinical laboratory exercises was distributed to the HSDM classes of 2005 and 2006 (n=70). The HSDM preclinical curriculum hours were compared to national data as reported by the American Dental Association (ADA). Cross-tabulations were constructed, and the Fisher's exact test was conducted to examine the relationships between the variables. We found that HSDM preclinical hours in Endodontics, Operative, and Prosthodontics were significantly lower than at other schools. During the preclinical exercises, the Prosthodontics preclinical exercises were found to be the most stressful and provided the lowest self-confidence in treating patients as compared to the other preclinical subject areas. HSDM students' scores on the National Board Part I and II examinations continue to be among the highest in the nation and have not been affected by the change in curriculum. We conclude that the change in HSDM's curriculum that resulted in targeted, shorter preclinical exercises has not affected clinical and didactic outcomes, but may have affected the anxiety that students feel when entering the clinic.     

The Dental Student as Technician: An 18-Year Follow-Up of Preclinical Laboratory Programs

In 1977, a survey of American and Canadian dental schools was conducted by Weintraub to determine the delegation of laboratory procedures in preclinical and clinical complete and removable partial denture programs. This was performed in light of challenges raised to the value of requiring dental students, rather than laboratory technicians, to perform the various laboratory procedures involved in the fabrication of complete and removable partial dentures. Since 1977, the rate of edentulism has declined in the United States, and fewer edentulous patients have sought regular dental care. In addition, approximately 20% fewer curriculum hours have been spent in dental schools in removable prosthodontic instruction; a declining number of graduating dental students have felt comfortable with their level of knowledge of removable prosthodontics, especially complete dentures, and have performed fewer removable prosthodontic procedures in practice because of a perceived lack of treatment cost-effectiveness. The present study, an 18-year follow-up to the 1977 survey, was designed to determine if such trends toward a deemphasis on removable prosthodontic treatment have affected the mechanisms of instruction in and the extent to which dental schools instruct students about removable prosthodontics laboratory procedures. The 1995 survey was mailed to 53 American dental schools. Forty-six schools returned the completed survey, for a response rate of 87%. Results showed that the proportion of schools with removable prosthodontic preclinical programs, especially those in removable partial dentures, increased, as did the relative amount of material presented to students in these programs. This was accomplished primarily through the enhancement of laboratory technician support, both in-house and commercial, of student preclinical removable prosthodontic laboratory procedures. The conflict between these outcomes and the call by the dental community, as well as that of the 1995 Institute of Medicine Study, for a reduced emphasis on teaching students about the technical details involved in removable prosthesis fabrication is recognized and explored.     

Preclinical restorative training

In conjunction with its problem-based learning curriculum, Harvard School of Dental Medicine (HSDM) developed a shortened preclinical restorative training curriculum. This study compared our curriculum with those in other dental schools and examined student reaction to it. Twenty-nine U.S. dental schools responded to a survey regarding the length of their preclinical course in Operative Dentistry. Nationally, preclinical courses ranged from 179 hours to 280 hours (mean +/- SEM = 193 +/- 9 hours; n = 29). In marked contrast, the new seventy-five-hour preclinical curriculum at Harvard was the lowest of any school, and significantly lower than the U.S. average (p < 0.01). In Harvard's previous curriculum, students spent 232 curriculum hours. Reactions of Harvard students to this compact preclinical curriculum were surveyed using a three-topic, three-category survey instrument. Results indicated that, prior to beginning clinical patient care, approximately 80 percent of students felt that the course was too short and 20 percent just right. Conversely, and retrospectively, after completing their dental school training, only 35 percent felt it was too short, and 65 percent felt it was just right. Retrospectively, in terms of clinical preparedness, 55 percent felt adequately prepared and 35 percent felt well prepared to treat their patients. No significant change was noted between Part II National Board scores following the change to the reduced curricula time. The average National Board Part II scores prior to initiating the new curriculum was 86.3, and afterwards, it was 86.2. Further, for the North East Regional Board, HSDM students in the past four years demonstrated a 98 percent overall success rate with 100 percent primary pass in the operative dentistry part of the examination. These results suggest that an abbreviated preclinical training is not only possible, but may make time available for training opportunities in other areas, such as aesthetic dental procedures and new biomaterials.     

The Dental Student as Technician: An 18-Year Follow-Up of Clinical Laboratory Programs

In 1977, a survey of American and Canadian dental schools was conducted by Weintraub to determine the delegation of laboratory procedures in preclinical and clinical complete and removable partial denture programs. This was performed in light of challenges raised to the value of requiring dental students, rather than laboratory technicians, to perform the various laboratory procedures involved in the fabrication of complete and removable partial dentures. Since 1977, the rate of edentulism has declined in the United States, and fewer edentulous patients have sought regular dental care. In addition, approximately 20% fewer curriculum hours have been spent in dental schools in removable prosthodontic instruction; a declining number of graduating dental students have felt comfortable with their level of knowledge of removable prosthodontics, especially complete dentures, and have performed fewer removable prosthodontic procedures in practice because of a perceived lack of treatment cost-effectiveness. The present study, an 18-year follow-up to the 1977 survey, was designed to determine if such trends toward a deemphasis on removable prosthodontic treatment have affected the mechanisms of instruction in and the extent to which dental schools instruct students about removable-prosthodontics laboratory procedures. The 1995 survey was mailed to 53 American dental schools. Forty-six schools returned the completed survey, for a response rate of 87%. Results showed that the relative amount of material presented to students in clinical removable prosthodontics programs increased, primarily through the enhancement of laboratory technician support, both in-house and commercial, of student clinical removable prosthodontic laboratory procedures. The increase was greater than in preclinical removable prosthodontic programs, which were described in a companion article. The conflict between these outcomes and the call by the dental community, as well as that of the 1995 Institute of Medicine Study, for a reduced emphasis on teaching students about the technical details involved in removable prosthesis fabrication is recognized and explored.     

Evaluation of Dental Students as Instructors in Preclinical Prosthodontics and Occlusion Courses

PURPOSE: While facing a shortage of faculty members, dental schools need to be innovative in their educational methodologies. One approach to augment student learning would be to mentor dental students as participating faculty in current courses. A study was undertaken to evaluate dental students as instructors in preclinical prosthodontics and occlusion courses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In spring term 2003, three senior dental students (4DN) and four full-time faculty were assigned as faculty for each of two preclinical courses: fixed prosthodontics and complete denture prosthodontics. In the summer term 2003, two junior dental students (3DN) and five full-time faculty were assigned to teach in the occlusion preclinical course. Each course had previously been conducted with a total of seven full-time faculty. Three types of outcome assessment were accomplished: (1) evaluation by the 2DN students of full-time faculty and student instructors at the end of the course using a standardized university scale of 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent); (2) a survey of student instructors about their experience; and (3) a course debriefing with selected 2DN students. RESULTS: The overall mean instructor-quality score assigned to the student instructors, 4.5 (SD, 0.7), was slightly higher than that of faculty instructors, 4.2 (SD, 0.9). Student instructors were rated higher than or equal to full-time faculty based on the mean response scores for all ten evaluation questions. The greatest difference between faculty and student ratings was in the category of "respect and concern for the students" in all courses. In addition, information gathered from eight student instructors indicated that the experience was a very positive one overall with an increased interest in an academic career noted. Comments from the 2DN students in the debriefing sessions were positive about having student instructors. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that from the perspective of second year dental students, senior and junior dental students were accepted as preclinical instructors in prosthodontics and occlusion preclinical courses. Additionally, senior and junior students who participated in student teaching had a positive experience. The use of dental students as preclinical faculty in prosthodontics and occlusion appears to be a viable approach for mentoring students in careers in academics, providing student instructors with higher learning experiences, and supplementing the efforts of full-time faculty.     

Introducing dental students to clinical patient care: The complete denture prosthodontics transition clinic

Using complete denture treatment as an introduction to clinical patient care for dental students, the purposes of the Complete Denture Prosthodontics Transition Clinic at the University of Colorado School of Dentistry are to reduce the time lapse between the preclinical complete denture prosthodontics course and the first denture patient experience, and to encourage development of student self-confidence and skills. In the 2002 spring semester, faculty at the University of Colorado School of Dentistry initiated the Complete Denture Prosthodontics Transition Clinic for DS-II (second-year) dental students, as an introduction to clinical patient care. Each patient was assigned to a team of two dental students. Three Division of Prosthodontics faculty members staffed each clinic session, providing a student-to-faculty ratio of approximately 6.6:1 and a patient-to-faculty ratio of approximately 3.3:1. All DS-II students in the Class of 2004 delivered their first complete dentures no later than 8 months (average, 184 days) after the last day of the preclinical complete denture prosthodontics course. The time from the diagnostic appointment through the denture placement appointment averaged 39 days for patients treated in this program, compared with an average of 98 days or more for previous classes. The program was successful in achieving the goal of reducing the time lapse between the preclinical complete denture prosthodontics course and the first denture patient experience.     

Which factors influence students' selection of advanced graduate programs? One institution's experience

The reasons that students choose certain specialties may be integral to the quality of specialty programs and the future of those specialties. The Harvard School of Dental Medicine (HSDM) has a high percentage (87.6 percent) of students who enroll in postgraduate programs. The goals of this study were to establish a baseline of factors that affect postgraduate program selection at HSDM and to determine if there was a significant difference in factor selection by gender, relationship status, graduation year, or choice to specialize versus choice to pursue advanced training in general dentistry. As a pilot study, we asked HSDM graduates from the classes of 2005 to 2007 to rank the importance of forty-two factors in selecting a field of dentistry and a particular program or institution within a specialty. Overall, students felt that intellectual content, challenging diagnostic problems, and possessing a special skill or talent unique to a specialty were the most important factors in choosing a field of dentistry. Influence of family members in dentistry was ranked as least important. In choice of a certain program or institution within a given field, clinical training and philosophy of training were ranked most highly. Students felt that the opportunity to moonlight was least important. Significant differences (p<0.05) were found regarding gender, relationship status, and students who chose to specialize versus those pursuing advanced general dentistry training. No significant differences were found among the students in different graduating classes.     

Students'' evaluation of online course materials in Fixed Prosthodontics: a case study

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess a new online course format for dental students. Preclinical Fixed Prosthodontics I is a didactic and laboratory course given in the first year of the dental school curriculum. In the spring semester of 1999, the didactic portion of the course was offered in a web-based format as a supplement to the traditional lecture format. METHODS: The study population was 53 first year dental students at one school. The study design was a one group post test without a control group. The online questionnaire consisted of multiple choice questions, Leikert scale questions and open-ended questions. Data were collected using Filemaker Pro and analyzed using Epilnfo. RESULTS: Student response rate was 96% (52/53). All of the students responded that they felt comfortable with their computer skills in utilizing this course format. Most (96%) responded that the online materials were either very helpful or helpful to them. About half, (54%) recommended that the online format be continued as a supplement to traditional lectures, while 28% recommended replacing traditional lectures with the new format in order to provide more laboratory time in the course. The syllabus, lecture materials, bulletin board and handouts were found to be the most helpful online features. The least helpful features were the listserve, decision tree, and e-mail options. Most frequently mentioned strengths of the online material were listed as 1) the ability to view material at their own pace and at a time convenient to them, 2) quality photographs in lecture materials and 3) online quizzes. Weaknesses of the course were ranked by students as 1) problems with access to the materials and the intranet system, 2) taking quizzes online and 3) difficulty in printing the web-based lecture materials. CONCLUSIONS: The delivery of web-based material as a course supplement in Fixed Prosthodontics I was determined to be an overall success. Fine tuning of problems with access to the materials took place throughout the course. The student feedback will help direct future development of web-based course materials in the dental school curriculum.     

Patient-Centered Competency-Based Education in Fixed Prosthodontics

Revision of a traditional fixed prosthodontic curriculum was undertaken in response to observed private practice patterns, recent literature in fixed prosthodontics, and an increasingly crowded dental school curriculum. The revision was further motivated by the commitment of the faculty to become patient-centered in all components of instruction. The resultant preclinical and clinical curriculum emphasizes patient care activities and minimizes student-generated laboratory products. This program is characterized as patient-driven, competency-based, and criterion-referenced, and it places heavy reliance on validated pedagogical strategies, which include evaluation of self and peers. The curriculum requires the development of good communication skills with peers, faculty, and commercial laboratories and creates time for the student to develop critical patient care skills without requiring more curriculum time. The new fixed prosthodontic curriculum appears to be consistent with current private general practice, national licensing examinations, and the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine's report to dental education.     

Problem-based learning at the Harvard School of Dental Medicine: self-assessment of performance in postdoctoral training

Problem-based learning (PBL) was implemented into the dental curriculum at the Harvard School of Dental Medicine (HSDM) in 1994 with an expectation that this pedagogy would enhance students' critical thinking and communication skills as well as general professional competencies. Previous studies have described several aspects of the outcome of PBL curricula at the predoctoral level. However, there is no information available on the perceptions and performance of PBL graduates during their postdoctoral training in dentistry. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of PBL methodology on the performance of HSDM graduates during their postdoctoral training in comparison with their non-HSDM (traditional) co-residents. Surveys containing traditional knowledge-based criteria, preclinical and clinical criteria, and PBL criteria were sent to HSDM graduates from the classes of 2002 through 2004 who were in postgraduate training programs. The HSDM and traditional graduates were asked to evaluate and compare their performance in selected areas with those of their co-residents from either a PBL curriculum or a traditional curriculum. The directors of each program were also asked to assess HSDM graduates relative to other graduates in the program based on the same aspects. Overall, HSDM graduates rated themselves more highly than non-HSDM graduates on all competencies. No significant difference between HSDM and non-HSDM responses was found in general dental knowledge, specialty specific knowledge, preclinical skills, clinical skills, communication with staff, and patient education, whereas significant differences (p<0.05) were found for communication with patients, critical thinking, independent learning, performance in small group settings, self-assessment, and teamwork. The data obtained from the program directors revealed corresponding results. The HSDM graduates' capacity for independent learning was rated as "excellent" by 65.31 percent of the directors and 80.95 percent of the HSDM graduates themselves. These findings suggest that the performance of HSDM graduates during their postdoctoral training met expectations and were similar to non-HSDM graduates for traditional residency program competencies. However, the PBL training appears to provide HSDM graduates with enhanced abilities in independent learning, communication, and cooperation skills.     

A survey of deans: trends, challenges, and mentoring in prosthodontics. Part 2.

PURPOSE: This study consists of two parts. Part 1, a survey of program directors, was conducted to examine current trends in advanced education in prosthodontics in the United States. Part 2 reports on the findings of a survey distributed to the deans of US dental schools to evaluate their observations of trends in prosthodontic education. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A national, electronic survey of 55 dental school deans was distributed by e-mail to evaluate an interest in specialty training, an interest in specialization in prosthodontics, faculty shortages, programs to address faculty shortages, predoctoral curriculum in prosthodontics, opinions regarding dental specialties, and the administrative position of prosthodontics within the schools. RESULTS: Of the 55 deans, 44 deans responded, an 80% response rate. Only five deans reported a decrease in the number of students seeking specialty training after dental school. The remaining 39 deans reported a large increase, slight increase, or no change in those seeking specialty training. In 29.6% of the deans' responses, an increased interest in prosthodontics was reported, whereas 16 deans reported no change in the level of interest. One or more open faculty positions in prosthodontics existed at 29 dental schools, and 28 schools offered at least one incentive or a variety of incentives to recruit faculty. The respondents to the deans' survey revealed predoctoral student exposure to prosthodontists was high, and exposure to postgraduate prosthodontics students was low. A survey of internal school programs that might have an impact on an increased interest in prosthodontics revealed the presence of a predoctoral mentoring program for prosthodontics in 80% of the institutions. The clinical curriculum included treatment of a variety of cases, including complex cases as defined by a diagnostic classification system. The response to whether dental specialties should be combined or remain individual provided some interesting data. Only 40.9% of the deans responded that prosthodontics was a separate department. CONCLUSION: Dental school deans reported an increased interest in specialty training. Predoctoral student exposure to prosthodontics was high due to the nature of their clinical experience and due to the exposure to full-time prosthodontics faculty. Many dental schools have programs, such as mentoring and new technology, which might have an impact on predoctoral students' increased interest in prosthodontics.     

Removable prosthodontics: A survey of practices and attitudes among South Australian dentists

All dentists registered in South Australia were surveyed in July 1993 in relation to removable prosthodontics. The replies indicated that removable prosthodontics constituted a significant part of most dental practices. Most dentists felt that removable prosthodontics should be an essential part of the undergraduate curriculum. They felt that more expertise is now required to manage the treatment of the ageing population with either their first or replacement removable prostheses. The majority of dentists felt that their own undergraduate training had equipped them well to manage removable prosthodontic treatment for their patients; however, many helpful suggestions were made on areas that they thought required more emphasis.     

Do tutor expertise and experience influence student performance in a problem-based curriculum?

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between student performance and tutor expertise and experience in the Restorative Treatment course in a problem-based learning (PBL) dental curriculum. This retrospective study evaluated a cohort of 206 third-year dental students at Harvard School of Dental Medicine who were enrolled in the Restorative Treatment course between 2000 and 2005. Tutor expertise in prosthodontics and prior tutoring experience were measured against student performance in five areas: 1) tutorial session, 2) midterm examination, 3) final examination, 4) preclinical laboratory, and 5) overall cumulative course grade. Student performance in each of the five areas measured against combinations of tutor subject matter expertise and tutoring experience level showed no statistically significant difference between the groups in the overall course grade. However, student performance in the expert group showed a significant difference in the final examination compared to the nonexpert group (p<0.05). Also, students in the group consisting of expert tutors with no experience performed better on the final examination compared to those students who had expert tutors with experience (p<0.05). The results indicate that overall student performance in the problem-based Restorative Treatment course is not affected by tutor expertise or prior tutoring experience.     

Special care dentistry for people with intellectual disability in dental education: an Italian experience

Aim:  This study documented: (i) the curriculum in special care dentistry in the Italian dental schools, as perceived by Deans and by students, (ii) the rate of satisfaction of dental students with their curricular education in special care dentistry, (iii) the attitude of the dental students towards special care dentistry and towards the 'Special Smiles' programme.
Methods:  The quality and amount of didactic and clinical training delivered by each dental school for subjects with intellectual disability (ID), the interest of students towards this health field and the 'Special Smiles' programme were collected. Self-administered surveys were sent to the Dean and to all the final year students of all dental schools in 20 Italian Universities.
Results:  Only four Deans of the 20 dental schools answered the survey, stating to provide didactic and clinical education in special care dentistry. A 51% of student response rate was obtained. Dental students reported to spend about 4% of didactic and 5% of clinical training in the dental care for ID subjects. Most students (83%) rated the training they had received on the topic to be poor. Over 50% of students expressed interest in working in dental offices specifically dedicated to ID patients and 25% of students wished to become Special Smiles volunteers.
Conclusions:  Although the paucity of didactic and clinical training in dental care for ID patients, this survey demonstrated a high level of student's interest in learning more about treating these subjects. The current results could suggest to revise the curricular standards of dental schools, by promoting ID-oriented education programmes.     

Centric relation definitions taught in 7 dental schools: Results of faculty and student surveys

PURPOSE: The purpose of this investigation was to assess the level of consensus regarding the definition of centric relation and its clinical use in 7 US dental schools. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The preclinical and clinical faculty in the departments of prosthodontics, operative, and general dentistry (n = 137) at 7 dental schools and a convenience sample of fourth year students (n = 150) at the same schools were invited to complete 2-page surveys regarding the definitions and use of centric relation at their institutions. The faculty and student survey included 6 commonly used centric relation definitions from the 1994 Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms, and provided space for writing in definitions not listed on the form. The participants were asked to identify which definition was used at their school. RESULTS: Return rate was 85% for faculty and 75% for students. Both faculty and students identified a low level of consensus regarding the definition and clinical use of centric relation at their dental school. Numerous definitions are in use at each institution. Extramural practice participation and the number of years since dental school graduation were variables associated with the faculty's choice of definition. The faculty who did not participate in an extramural practice chose older definitions. Dental educators graduating before 1975 selected either the oldest or the most recent centric relation definition, whereas the more recent graduates frequently selected the newer definitions. There were no statistical differences between prosthodontic specialists and nonspecialists in choice of definitions. Three courses identified by the students as having the most influence on their understanding of centric relation were preclinical removable prosthodontics, preclinical occlusion, and clinical removable prosthodontics. CONCLUSION: The results of this survey suggest that the controversy will continue, because to date there is no consensus regarding the definition of centric relation within the 7 dental schools surveyed.     

A 10‐Year Survey of US Deans: Trends,Challenges, and Mentoring in Prosthodontics. Part 2

Purpose: Part 2 of this survey reports on the 2009 survey findings distributed to the deans of US dental schools. A national, electronic survey of 58 dental school deans was distributed by e‐mail to evaluate an interest in specialty training, an interest in specialty training in prosthodontics, faculty shortage issues, predoctoral curriculum in prosthodontics, ideology regarding dental specialties, and the administrative position of prosthodontics within the schools. Materials and Methods: The survey data were transferred to an online spreadsheet program for statistical analysis (Key Survey, Inc. http://www.keysurvey.com , Braintree, MA). The opinions of dental school deans were viewed as legitimate indicators of change within predoctoral and postdoctoral prosthodontic education. Statistical analysis was carried out using Statistica Version 9.1 (Statsoft, Tulsa, OK). Results: Of the 58 deans, 42 deans responded, for a 72.4% response rate. Twenty‐three deans reported an increase in the number of students seeking specialty training after dental school. Only three deans reported a decrease in those seeking specialty training. In the 2009 survey, 45% the deans responded that there was an increased interest in prosthodontics. One or more open faculty positions in prosthodontics existed at 24 (59%) of the dental schools, and 30 (71%) offered at least one incentive or a variety of incentives to recruit faculty. The 2009 respondents to the deans’ survey revealed predoctoral student exposure to prosthodontists was high, and exposure to advanced education in prosthodontics students was low. A survey of internal school programs that might have an impact on an increased interest in prosthodontics revealed the presence of a predoctoral mentoring program for prosthodontics in 36 (88%) of the institutions. The clinical curriculum included treatment of a variety of cases including complex cases as defined by a diagnostic classification system. The 2009 survey respondents reported an increase in the number of schools where prosthodontics is a separate entity or department. Conclusion: Deans reported an increased interest in prosthodontics in the 2009 survey. Open faculty positions in prosthodontics existed in the majority of dental schools, and most schools offered incentives to recruit faculty. The survey of deans found a very high level of exposure of dental students to full‐time prosthodontists and a very low exposure level to students enrolled in advanced education in prosthodontics. The establishment of mentoring programs in prosthodontics was reported by most deans, and the predoctoral curriculum included treating complex cases. Most deans stated that dual‐specialty training in prosthodontics and periodontics would be beneficial. The 2009 survey reported an increase in the number of departments of prosthodontics in US schools.     

Comparison of clinical productivity of senior dental students in a dental school teaching clinic versus community externship rotations

The aim of this study was to report on the clinical and monetary productivity of fourth-year dental students at community-based clinical sites and school-based clinics at the Harvard School of Dental Medicine (HSDM). This study included forty-seven students from the graduating classes of 2006, 2007, and 2008. These fourth-year students were required to spend twelve weeks at one of several participating community health centers throughout Massachusetts and New Hampshire. Students also treated their patient pool in the teaching practice at HSDM in the fourth year. The most common sixty American Dental Association procedure codes were compared, and variables were created by grouping them by specialty or type of service. HSDM dental students completed 8,365 procedures at an externship site during their community experience. An average of 178 procedures was completed per student, and mean revenue of $17,486 was produced. In comparison, the same students completed 3,640 procedures during an equal amount of time spent (normalized for this study) at the school teaching practice clinic, where each student completed an average of seventy-seven procedures and generated $16,802 in revenue. The results of this study show that fourth-year dental students at the community health centers, working under the supervision of adjunct faculty, completed more than double the number of procedures they did in the HSDM teaching practice clinic. However, the revenue generated was very similar at the two sites. In addition, the types of procedures performed by students at externship sites were simpler than the complex and specialized procedures performed at the HSDM clinic, which include fixed and removable prosthetics, periodontal surgery, and implantology.     

Predoctoral Fixed Prosthodontics Curriculum Survey

Purpose In 1996, a survey of American dental schools was conducted. The purpose of the survey was to determine the curricular structure, techniques taught, and materials used in predoctoral fixed prosthodontics courses. Materials and Methods The survey was mailed to the course directors of predoctoral fixed prosthodontic programs at 53 American dental schools. Of these, 42 schools returned the completed survey, resulting in a response rate of 79%. The mean, median, and the range of responses were computed where applicable. Results The results from this survey show that the mean student-to-faculty ratio in the preclinical course was 11:1, with a median of 10:1 and a range of 5:1 to 25:1. The mean number of laboratory clock hours was 164, with a median of 148 and a range of 81 to 288. The mean number of lecture hours reported was 42, with a median of 35 and a range of 20 to 80. Fifty-five percent of the schools used the Hanau semiadjustable articulator. The most commonly used provisional technique was the thermoplastic custom external surface form (44%). The finish line of choice for the full metal restoration was the chamfer placed circumferentially (74%). The finish line of choice for the porcelain-fused-to-metal restoration was the shoulder placed facially and the chamfer placed lingually (38%). Conclusions Predoctoral fixed prosthodontics education and technical experience varies from school to school, yet a large percentage of schools agree on certain topics.     

An evaluation of the preclinical prosthodontic training at the Faculty of Dentistry, University of Bergen, Norway

The curriculum of the dental faculty at the University of Bergen was revised and a new curriculum was implemented in 2000. The first candidates graduated in 2003. In the new curriculum the theoretical teaching consists of an extended integrated lecture series in prosthodontics and biomaterials. The revised laboratory course includes an increased number of tooth preparations performed on phantom heads solely. Newer types of preparations based on bonding technique, such as ceramic crowns, veneers and inlays, have also been introduced. As a consequence of the reduced time allocated to the course, the amount of dental technical work has been considerably reduced. Demonstrations of practical procedures are video‐based. Several theoretical and practical tests are carried out during the course. The purpose of this study was to assess the outcome of the alterations made, by comparing former students’ opinions on different aspects of the two curricula. A questionnaire was mailed to the students graduated in 2003 with the new curriculum and graduates in 1997 and 2000 with the ‘old’ curriculum. The results indicate that the alterations tended to improve the students’ evaluations of some aspects of the course. In addition, the new curriculum appeared to be more relevant for the succeeding work in the clinic.