Sentinel lymph node mapping and biopsy for ductal carcinoma in situ and other controversial indications

This review discusses the currently available literature regarding three controversial indications for sentinel node mapping for breast cancer patients. For women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), the use of sentinel lymph node mapping (SLNM) should be limited to women having a mastectomy. For patients with multifocal breast carcinoma, SLNM is accurate when a retroareolar injection technique is employed in the procedure. When treatment plans for node-negative patients call for neoadjuvant chemotherapy, accurate sentinel node mapping can be performed prior to the administration of chemotherapy. The resolution of these and other controversies should result in the expansion of the number of patients evaluated with SLNM in the future.     

Beneficio de la biopsia del ganglio linfático centinela en pacientes con carcinoma in situ de mama

Introduction

Patients with a diagnosis of breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) have a low risk of developing axillary metastases. The use of sentinel node biopsy in this group of patients is controversial. The objective of this study is to determine if the sentinel node biopsy benefits a subgroup of patients with DCIS.

Patients and method

Between April 2002 and December 2007, patients with a diagnosis of DCIS and who underwent a sentinel node biopsy were included in the study. In our centre the sentinel node biopsy was performed in patients with DCIS who required a mastectomy, high grade and >2 cm DCIS and palpable DCIS.

Results

Forty-seven patients were included in the study. In all cases the sentinel node was identified. Twenty-five (53.1%) patients underwent a mastectomy due to extensive DCIS; 14 of these (56%) with immediate reconstruction with implants. Twenty-five (53.1%) patients had high grade DCIS. In 7 (14.8%) patients the tumour was palpable. Fourteen patients (29.7%) were upgraded to invasive breast cancer in the definitive histology. In 2 (4.2%) patients who underwent a mastectomy a positive sentinel node was found.

Conclusions

Performing sentinel node biopsy in this group of DCIS patients has lead us to identify 4% of patients with positive sentinel nodes. Furthermore, 29.7% of the patients have avoided a second invasive diagnostic procedure for definitive histology. For these reasons we consider it appropiate to perform sentinel node biopsy in this subgroup of patients with DCIS of the breast.     

Sentinel node procedure is warranted in ductal carcinoma in situ with high risk of occult invasive carcinoma and microinvasive carcinoma treated by mastectomy

Abstract:  Axillary lymph node dissection in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast is not warranted because DCIS has no metastatic potential. However, the risk of microinvasive carcinoma (MIC) exists in large DCIS treated by mastectomy. The aim of this series is to evaluate the incidence of lymph node metastases in DCIS and DCIS-MIC. We analyzed retrospectively patients treated in six French cancer centers for pure DCIS or DCIS-MIC. Surgical procedures were lumpectomy or mastectomy associated with an axillary sentinel node (SN) procedure. We included 161 patients suffering from pure DCIS (116/161, 72%) or DCIS-MIC (45/161, 28%). Mean age was 56 years (32–78). We observed underestimation between core biopsy and histological result in 43/142 cases (30%). These data show an association between lesion size, solid subtype, high-grade DCIS, and underestimation. Forty-eight breast conservative procedures were performed and 113 mastectomies (70%). SN procedure was performed using blue dye, technetium, or both. In our series, we selected patients with a high risk of occult invasive carcinoma: high grade (55%), mean size (27 mm), and mastectomy (112). Six SN were found positive (3.7%). In the five patients treated with complete axillary dissection, the SN was the only positive node. SN in DCIS is an interesting procedure but not necessary for all patients. We need to focus on the subgroup with or a high risk of occult MIC: extensive calcifications or palpable mass, DCIS diagnosed by core biopsy and underestimation, multifocality, high grade, large tumor size, MIC, and mastectomy.     

Analysis of sentinel lymph node mapping with immediate pathologic review in patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy for breast carcinoma

Background Sentinel lymph node mapping (SLNM) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy are becoming established components of therapy for selected patients with breast carcinoma. However, neoadjuvant therapy has been considered a relative contraindication to SLNM. In an effort to learn whether patients who have received preoperative chemotherapy can undergo accurate SLNM, we evaluated our experience with this technique. Methods From January 1997 to June 2000, SLNM and axillary lymph node dissection were concurrently performed in 35 patients who received preoperative chemotherapy. Mapping was performed with^99mTc sulfur colloid only in one patient and Lymphazurin dye only in 15 patients, and the two methods were combined in the remainder. Results SLNM successfully identified a sentinel lymph node in 30 (86%) patients. Metastatic disease was identified in the sentinel lymph nodes of four patients during surgery. The intraoperative pathologic diagnosis proved to be correct in 19 (79%) of 24 patients. The final pathologic diagnosis of the sentinel lymph node reflected the status of the axillary contents in all patients in whom it was identified. Conclusions These results demonstrate that SLNM can be consistently performed in patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy for breast cancer, suggesting the utility of this technique in this patient populations. Presented at the 54th Annual Meeting of the Society of Surgical Oncology, Washington, DC, March 15–18, 2001.     

Sentinel Node Biopsy is Important in Mastectomy for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ

Background There is uncertainty about the utility of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and its potential to avoid axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in patients undergoing mastectomy for DCIS. Methods A review was conducted of 179 patients who underwent mastectomy with sentinel node biopsy for DCIS without invasion or microinvasion on premastectomy pathology review. Results The sentinel node identification rate was 98.9% (177/179). Twenty (11.3%) of 177 mastectomies for DCIS had a positive SNB: two micrometastasis (pN1mi) and 18 isolated tumor cells [pN0(i+)]. Unsuspected invasive cancer was found in 20 (11.2%) of 179 mastectomies, eight T1mic, five T1a, three T1b, and four T1c tumors. Sentinel nodes were identified in 19 of 20 patients with invasive cancer and four were positive: one pN1mi and three pN0(i+). Eighteen of 19 patients with unsuspected invasive cancer were able to avoid axillary dissection on the basis of SNB results. Of the 159 patients whose final pathology revealed DCIS without invasion, a sentinel node was identified in 158 (99.4%). The SNB was positive in 16 patients (10.1%): one pN1mi and 15 pN0(i+). Three patients underwent ALND on the basis of positive SNBs and in each the SNB was the only positive node. Conclusions 11% of patients undergoing mastectomy for DCIS were found to have invasive cancer on final pathology. The use of SNB during mastectomy for DCIS allowed nearly all such patients to avoid axillary dissection. These results support routine use of SNB during mastectomy for DCIS.     

Two-year follow-up of areola-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction

OBJECTIVE: Areola-sparing mastectomy (ASM) is defined as resecting the nipple and any existing surgical biopsy scar, removing all breast parenchyma, and leaving a natural envelope of skin (including the areola), which improves the aesthetic result of immediate reconstruction. We previously demonstrated a <1% incidence of malignant involvement of the areola in a retrospective mastectomy series. Subsequently, we performed ASM on selected patients undergoing mastectomy. We report here our results from an ongoing study of ASM at our institution. METHODS: During a 20-month period, 17 ASMs with immediate reconstruction were performed on 12 patients. Patients were followed-up prospectively by the surgical oncologist for complications and recurrence. RESULTS: ASM was performed for breast cancer prophylaxis (n = 10), ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (n = 4), and <2-cm peripheral infiltrating carcinoma (n = 3). The mean patient age was 47.7 years (range 37 to 61). Thirteen patients were reconstructed with tissue expanders and 4 with pedicle transverse rectus abdominus myocutaneous flaps. Ten patients underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy. None of the ten patients showed sentinel lymph node metastasis. Two patients with DCIS and microinvasion underwent subareolar touch-prep cytology, both of which were negative for malignancy. All mastectomy specimens had negative histologic margins. No patient received chemotherapy or radiation therapy. One postoperative consisted of a localized wound infection that resolved with oral antibiotics. At a median follow-up of 24 months (range 11 to 28), there were no instances of local or distant recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, we found that ASM with immediate reconstruction provides excellent aesthetic results with infrequent complications. Furthermore, in this small series we showed no recurrence at 2 years. We continue to offer ASM for selected patients including those desiring surgical breast cancer prophylaxis as well as those with DCIS or small peripheral infiltrating ductal carcinoma.     

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and biopsy of the sentinel lymph node

INTRODUCTION: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is the disease with increasing incidence. Nowadays, approximately 80% DCIS are diagnosed via mammography and represent more than 20% of all types of breast cancer. The acceptance of surgical procedures with this type of breast carcinoma is controversial as primary diagnosis of non-invasive carcinoma is often underestimated and in the end, histopathological examination reveals invasive carcinoma with biological potential to metastasize. In cases of "risk" patient groups with DCIS, several studies report lymph node metastases. The aim of the study has been to assess the incidence of sentinel lymph node metastatic involvement in high-risk patient group with DCIS and in ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion (DCISMI), to note the incidence of invasive carcinoma in definitive histopathology in patients with pre-operative diagnosis of DCIS and to analyze some predictors of invasivity. STUDY TYPE AND PATIENT GROUP: In retrospective analysis, we evaluated the setting of 119 patients who have been operated on at our Clinic from January, 1st 2008 until December, 31th 2010 for the diagnosis of DCIS. Prospectively, we have created the setting of 44 patients with high-risk DCIS with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) performed. METHODS AND RESULTS. Metastatic involvement of sentinel lymph node in high-risk DCIS has been found in 4 cases (9.0%)--in 1 patient (2.2%) with correct diagnosis of DCIS and in 3 patients (6.8%) with invasive carcinoma according to final histopathology. In the patient with DCIS, a micrometastasis of 0.4 mm was found in one sentinel lymph node. After complete axillary dissection, non-sentinel axillary lymph nodes metastatic involvement was not demonstrated (14/0). In 6 cases (5.0%), we identified DCISMI and did not find metastasis in sentinel lymph node. In the high-risk DCIS group, in 4 patients (9.0%) DCISMI and in 12 patients (27.2%) invasive carcinoma was found after definitive histopathologic examination. In this group, the overall ratio of invasive lesions was 36.2%. As for predictors of invasivity, high-grade carcinoma (OR 4.2; 95% CI 1,40-12,58) has more than 4-fold higher influence and lesion size     

Role of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Ductal Carcinoma-in-situ Treated by Mastectomy

Background Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a widely accepted alternative to axillary lymph node dissection in invasive breast cancer. Its role in ductal carcinoma-in-situ (DCIS) is unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine factors associated with the subsequent diagnosis of invasive disease and to determine the role of SLNB when performing a mastectomy for DCIS. Methods A retrospective study was conducted of all mastectomies performed on patients with a preoperative diagnosis of DCIS between 2000 and 2005 at a single tertiary-care institution. Results Ninety mastectomies for DCIS were included, 54 (60%) of which were performed with concurrent SLNB. Of 44 patients diagnosed preoperatively with DCIS by core biopsy only, 34 patients (63%) had a concurrent SLNB, while 10 patients (28%) were treated with mastectomy alone (P < .01). Overall, 30 patients (33%) had invasive disease, 22 of whom received concurrent SLNB. Seven SLNB patients (13%) had positive SLNs. On univariate analysis, multifocality (P = .03), multicentricity (P = .01), comedonecrosis (P = .01), and diagnosis by core biopsy (P < .001) were associated with invasive disease on pathology. On multivariate analysis, comedonecrosis (P = .04) and diagnosis by core biopsy (P < .01) were independent predictors for invasion. There was no statistically significant predictor for sentinel lymph node metastasis. Conclusions Approximately one-third of patients with DCIS treated with mastectomy at our institution later had invasive disease, and factors associated with invasion have been identified. On the basis of our results, routine SLNB is recommended in this patient population.     

Sentinel lymph node mapping following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of sentinel lymph node mapping in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast carcinoma prior to lumpectomy or mastectomy and sentinel lymph node mapping followed by complete axillary dissection. A retrospective analysis of 14 patients from February 1998 to July 2000 with stage I to stage IIIB breast cancer diagnosed by core biopsy underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide) prior to definitive surgery, including lumpectomy or mastectomy and sentinel lymph node mapping, followed by full axillary dissection. Thirteen of 14 patients had successful sentinel lymph node identification (93%), and all 14 underwent full axillary dissection. An average of 2.2 sentinel nodes and a median of 16 axillary lymph nodes (including sentinel nodes) were found per patient. Of the 13 patients in whom a sentinel lymph node was identified, 10 were positive for metastases (77%). Only 4 of the 10 had further axillary metastases (40%). Three patients had negative sentinel lymph nodes shown by hematoxylin and eosin and cytokeratin stainings and had no axillary metastases (0% false negative). The single patient in whom a sentinel lymph node could not be identified had stage IIIA disease with extensive lymphatic tumor emboli. Sentinel lymph node mapping is feasible in neoadjuvant chemotherapy breast cancer patients and can spare a significant number of patients the morbidity of full axillary dissection. Further study to evaluate sentinel lymph node mapping in this patient population is warranted.     

The current treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ

A consensus conference was held in April, 1999, to help sift through the maze of controversy surrounding the treatment of mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Members of the panel included approximately 30 DCIS experts, who addressed issues relating diagnosis, treatment, treatment of breast (and axilla), adjuvant theraphy, among others. The panel agreed that the goal of treatment for DCIS is breast conservation and attempted to divide the population of patients with DCIS into subsets who are appropriately treated by mastectomy, radiation theraphy, or by excision alone. Major criteria for breast conservation include small size of area of DCIS, clear surgical margins, and favorable biology. Neither axilliary dissection nor sentinel node biopsy is appropriate for DCIS treated by breast conservation. The role of tamoxifen is currently under study, and although approved by the FDA for "risk reduction," its use in patients with DCIS is uncertain.     

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy: Is It Indicated in Patients With High-Risk Ductal Carcinoma-In-Situ and Ductal Carcinoma-In-Situ With Microinvasion?

Background: Axillary lymph node status is the strongest prognostic indicator of survival for women with breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of sentinel node metastases in patients with high-risk ductal carcinoma-in-situ (DCIS) and DCIS with microinvasion (DCISM).Methods: From November 1997 to November 1999, all patients who underwent sentinel node biopsy for high-risk DCIS (n = 76) or DCISM (n = 31) were enrolled prospectively in our database. Patients with DCIS were considered high risk and were selected for sentinel lymph node biopsy if there was concern that an invasive component would be identified in the specimen obtained during the definitive surgery. Patients underwent intraoperative mapping that used both blue dye and radionuclide. Excised sentinel nodes were serially sectioned and were examined by hematoxylin and eosin and by immunohistochemistry.Results: Of 76 patients with high-risk DCIS, 9 (12%) had positive sentinel nodes; 7 of 9 patients were positive for micrometastases only. Of 31 patients with DCISM, 3 (10%) had positive sentinel nodes; 2 of 3 were positive for micrometastases only. Six of nine patients with DCIS and three of three with DCISM and positive sentinel nodes had completion axillary dissection; one patient with DCIS had an additional positive node detected by conventional histological analysis.Conclusions: This study documents a high incidence of lymph node micrometastases as detected by sentinel node biopsy in patients with high-risk DCIS and DCISM. Although the biological significance of breast cancer micrometastases remains unclear at this time, these findings suggest that sentinel node biopsy should be considered in patients with high-risk DCIS and DCISM.     

Interest of sentinel lymph node biopsy for the staging of ductal carcinoma in situ

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to define the interest of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for the staging of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and DCIS with micro-invasion (DCISM) in patients with breast carcinoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From June 1999 to December 2002 we listed, in a retrospective study, 52 patients treated surgically for a DCIS or a DCISM. All except one had an histology before surgery, and all had SLNB. Intraoperative imprint cytology of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) was performed then there were analysed by staining with hematoxylin-eosin. Patients with positive SLN underwent complete axillary dissection. RESULTS: It was removed an average of three SLNs by patient (extreme 1 to 6). Metastases in the SLN were detected in four (7,7%) of the 52 patients, including three cases had only micrometastases in the SLN. In the four patients treated with complete axillary dissection, the SLN were the only positives nodes. CONCLUSION: The SLNB for DCIS and DCISM increases the involvement rate of lymph node. Because of the widespread for early detection of breast cancer, it is noted a regular increase in the rate of DCIS. Even if the attitude to be had towards the lymph node metastases in these cases is not yet well defined, and so only 2% of the patients approximately die of this pathology, it is interesting because of increase in absolute value of mortality, to try to improve the prognosis criteria to modify the treatment of this pathology.     

乳腺导管内癌诊疗进展

近年来,随着乳腺癌钼靶筛查技术的应用和普及,乳腺导管内癌的检出率不断上升.熟悉乳腺导管内癌的临床表现、提高对乳腺导管内癌辅助检查结果的辨别能力,对诊断乳腺导管内癌至关重要.乳腺导管内癌的手术方式包括全乳腺切除、肿瘤局部广泛切除加放疗,以及单纯的肿瘤局部广泛切除;乳腺导管内癌常规不行腋窝淋巴结清扫已成为共识,前哨淋巴结活...     

�����ٴ�����ѧ�ᡶ�������ٰ�����ǰ���ܰͽ���ָ�ϡ����½�������

??Express and interpretation on American society of clinical oncology guideline update for Sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer WU Ke-jin.
Department of General Surgery, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, China
Abstract 2014 April, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) issued new clinical practice guideline on sentinel lymph node biopsy for patients with early-stage breast cancer in Journal of Clinical Oncology (JCO). This guideline update reflects some changes since the 2005 guideline. Based on randomized clinical trials (RCTs), there are three recommendations: (1) Women without sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases should not accept axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). (2) In most cases, Women with 1-2 metastatic SLNs going to undergo breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with whole-breast radiotherapy should not adopt ALND. (3) Women with SLN metastases planning to receive mastectomy should be provided ALND. Based on cohort studies and/or informal consensus, there are two prime recommendations. (1) Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) may be offered to those women with operable breast cancer and multicentric tumors, with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) planning to undergo mastectomy, who previously got breast and/or axillary surgery or who accepted preoperative/neoadjuvant systemic therapy. (2) SNB should not be offered to those women with large or locally advanced invasive breast cancer (tumor size T3/T4), inflammatory breast cancer, or DCIS will undergo BCS, or are pregnant.     

美国临床肿瘤学会《早期乳腺癌病人前哨淋巴结活检指南》更新介绍与解读

2014年4月,临床肿瘤学杂志（Journal of Clinical Oncology,JCO）上发表了美国临床肿瘤学会（American Society of Clinical Oncology,ASCO）关于早期乳腺癌病人应用前哨淋巴结活检（sentinel node biopsy,SNB）的若干新推荐。这是继2005年该学会首次推荐《早期乳腺癌病人前哨淋巴结活检指南》后的第一次更新。基于随机临床试验（RCT）证据,该项指南提出3条推荐：（1）无前哨淋巴结（sentinel lymph node,SLN）转移的女性病人不必接受腋窝淋巴结清扫术（axillary lymph node dissection, ALND）;（2）大多数伴有1~2个SLN转移,且计划接受保乳术及术后全乳放疗者无需行ALND;（3）有SLN转移并行全乳切除术者应接受ALND。基于队列研究和（或）非正式共识,更新两组推荐：（1）可手术的多中心肿瘤的乳腺癌病人、将行乳房切除术的导管原位癌（ductal carcinoma in situ,DCIS）病人、之前接受过乳腺和（或）腋窝手术的以及接受术前或新辅助系统治疗的病人,可以行SNB;（2）对瘤体较大或局部晚期浸润性乳腺癌（肿瘤大小T3/T4）、炎性乳腺癌、拟接受保乳治疗的DCIS以及孕期妇女,不适于行SNB。     

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Performed After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy is Accurate in Patients with Documented Node-Positive Breast Cancer at Presentation

Background The optimal strategy for incorporating lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy into the management of breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy remains controversial. Previous studies of sentinel node biopsy performed following neoadjuvant chemotherapy have largely reported on patients whose prechemotherapy, pathologic axillary nodal status was unknown. We report findings using a novel comprehensive approach to axillary management of node-positive-patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods We evaluated 54 consecutive breast cancer patients with biopsy-proven axillary nodal metastases at the time of diagnosis that underwent lymphatic mapping with nodal biopsy as well as concomitant axillary lymph node dissection after receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. All cases were treated at a single comprehensive cancer center between 2001 and 2005. Results The sentinel node identification rate after delivery of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 98%. Thirty-six patients (66%) had residual axillary metastases (including eight patients that had undergone resection of metastatic sentinel nodes at the time of diagnosis), and in 12 cases (31%) the residual metastatic disease was limited to the sentinel lymph node. The final, post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy sentinel node was falsely negative in three cases (8.6%). The negative final sentinel node accurately identified patients with no residual axillary disease in 17 cases (32%). Conclusions Sentinel lymph node biopsy performed after the delivery of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with documented nodal disease at presentation accurately identified cases that may have been downstaged to node-negative status and can spare this subset of patients (32%) from experiencing the morbidity of an axillary dissection.     

Importance of lymphatic mapping in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): why map DCIS?

The appropriateness of sentinel lymph node biopsy in the management of patients with biopsy diagnoses of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or DCIS with microinvasion (DCISM) has not been established. Three hundred forty-one patients presented with a biopsy diagnosis of DCIS or DCISM. Two hundred forty (70%) underwent sentinel node biopsy at their definitive procedure. All clinical and pathologic data were collected prospectively. Of 224 patients with a biopsy diagnosis of DCIS 23 (10%) were upstaged to infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) at their definitive therapy and of 16 patients with a biopsy diagnosis of DCISM seven (44%) were upstaged to IDC. Excisional biopsies were no more sensitive for detecting IDC than was core biopsy. Lymph node metastases were detected in 26 of 195 (13%) patients with a definitive diagnosis of DCIS, in three of 15 (20%) with a definitive diagnosis of DCISM, and in eight of 30 (27%) with a definitive diagnosis of IDC. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is a valuable tool in the treatment of patients with DCIS and DCISM and is particularly needed in those undergoing mastectomy. No "high-risk" group of patients can be identified for selective sentinel lymph node biopsy.     

Is Routine Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Indicated in Women Undergoing Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy? Magee-Womens Hospital Experience

INTRODUCTION: The routine use of sentinel node biopsy (SLNB) at the time of prophylactic mastectomy remains controversial. This retrospective study was undertaken to determine if SLNB is justified in patients undergoing CPM. METHODS: Between 1999 and 2004, 155 patients underwent contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) at the Magee-Womens Hospital of University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. Eighty patients (51.6%) had SLNB performed at the time of CPM. The therapeutic mastectomy and the CPM specimens were evaluated for histopathology. Goldflam's classification was used to determine the risk of malignancy in the CPM specimens. RESULTS: Pathology in the therapeutic mastectomy specimens included 105 (68%) invasive carcinomas and 50 (32%) in-situ carcinomas. Multicentricity and/or multifocality were reported in 49.7%, and 70% were estrogen receptor positive. Two invasive breast cancers and three cases of DCIS were diagnosed in 155 CPM specimens (n = 5, 3.2%). The median number of SLN identified was 2 (range 1-6) from the CPM axilla. Two patients had positive SLNB for metastatic carcinoma (n = 2/80, 2.5%) with no primary tumor identified in the prophylactic mastectomy specimen. In both patients the therapeutic mastectomy was for recurrent invasive carcinoma in patients with a prior history of axillary node dissection. Occult carcinoma was found in five prophylactic mastectomy specimens: two invasive and three DCIS. Only 1 out of the 75 patients not undergoing SLNB at the time of their initial surgery would have required axillary staging for a previously undiagnosed invasive cancer in the CPM specimen on final pathology. Of all 155 patients undergoing CPM, only 4 (2.5%) had identified final pathologic findings where axillary staging with SLNB was beneficial. There was no evidence of arm lymphedema in any patient who had undergone CPM and SLNB at a median follow-up of 24 months. CONCLUSION: Although SLNB is a minimally invasive method of axillary staging, this retrospective study does not support its routine use in patients undergoing CPM.     

Sentinel node biopsy in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: Never justified?

Sentinel lymph node biopsy for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast is not standard of care. However, nodal involvement for DCIS patients is reported. Aim of our study was to identify preoperative features predictive of nodal involvement in DCIS patients. We have retrospectively reviewed 175 patients with a preoperative diagnosis of DCIS following a vacuum‐assisted breast biopsy, and undergoing surgery with sentinel node biopsy. Variables distribution was compared between patients upstaged to invasive cancer at final pathology and patients with a confirmed DCIS, and between positive vs negative sentinel node patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for risk of a positive node. Lymph node biopsy was positive in 13 (7.4%) patients, with 8 (61.5%) macrometastases and 5 (38.5%) micrometastases. In these patients, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI‐RADS) index >4 (OR 4.69, 95% CI 1.282‐17.224, P = .02), lesion extension ≥20 mm (OR 4.25, 95% CI 1.255‐14.447, P = .02), multifocal disease (OR 4.12, 95% CI 0.987‐17.174, P = .05), comedo type (OR 3.54, 95% CI 1.044‐11.969, P = .04), and upstaging (OR 4.56, 95% CI 1.080‐19.249, P = .04) were all predictive of nodal involvement, although upstaging could not be predicted preoperatively. By multivariate analysis, the only independent factor predictive for positive sentinel node was multifocal disease (OR 5.14, 95% CI 1.015‐26.066, P < .05). A preoperative diagnosis of DCIS, also including advanced biopsy systems such as vacuum‐assisted breast biopsy, may be not always sufficient to exclude patients from sentinel node biopsy. DCIS patients with associated BI‐RADS >4, lesion extension ≥20 mm, comedo type, and above all multifocal disease should be considered for axillary evaluation.